pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.23922 · v1 · pith:TJEWW45Bnew · submitted 2026-06-22 · 💰 econ.GN · q-fin.EC

Regenerative Bonds: Formal Debt, Mutual-Aid, and Local Settlement Capacity

William O. Ruddick , Alex (Yeshey) Cahana , Tom Shael This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 05:39 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💰 econ.GN q-fin.EC
keywords regenerative bondsmutual-aidsettlement capacityformal debtcommitment poolslocal settlement systemsMonte Carlo modelingSarafu Network
0
0 comments X

The pith

Regenerative bonds allocate formal debt proceeds to local settlement systems while separating bondholder claims from mutual-aid commitments.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper develops regenerative bonds as formal debt instruments whose use-of-proceeds and governance rules direct funds to locally governed settlement systems. These systems strengthen capacity across productive, ecological, care, mutual-aid, and repair commitments without turning the commitments into investor collateral. The paper separates bondholder claims from local redeemable commitments and models commitment pools that curate, value, limit, exchange, route, and repair those commitments. Evidence from the Sarafu Network and Monte Carlo simulations calibrated to its empirical moments identifies a guardrail-pass region where scheduled debt service is preserved, mutual-aid circulation is maintained or amplified, and issuer headroom remains available in lower-stress conditions.

Core claim

The paper claims that formal debt can strengthen local settlement capacity when structured as regenerative bonds with disclosed use-of-proceeds rules allocating to locally governed systems. By separating bondholder claims from local redeemable commitments, the instruments allow bond liquidity to function as reusable catalytic funding while the issuer retains responsibility for debt service. Simulations identify a modeled guardrail-pass region in which scheduled service is preserved, mutual-aid circulation is maintained or amplified, and bond issuer headroom remains available in lower-stress cells, though higher debt-service pressure and capital intensity narrow this region.

What carries the argument

Regenerative bonds: formal debt instruments with use-of-proceeds and governance rules that allocate proceeds to locally governed settlement systems separating bondholder claims from local redeemable commitments.

If this is right

  • Scheduled debt service is preserved in the identified guardrail-pass region.
  • Mutual-aid circulation is maintained or amplified under the modeled conditions.
  • Bond issuer headroom remains available in lower-stress cells.
  • Higher debt-service pressure and capital intensity narrow the viable region.
  • Bond liquidity can act as reusable catalytic funding while preserving issuer responsibility for debt service.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The separation mechanism could allow formal debt to support local economies without converting informal commitments into hidden collateral.
  • Similar modeling might test whether the guardrail region holds when commitment pools operate under different network topologies.
  • Policy applications could include designing debt instruments that explicitly route proceeds to care and repair activities while tracking circulation metrics.
  • Extending the framework to other community currency systems would require checking whether their empirical moments produce comparable guardrail regions.

Load-bearing premise

The Monte Carlo engine calibrated to privacy-safe empirical moments from the Sarafu Network accurately captures the dynamics of commitment pools that curate, value, limit, exchange, route, and repair commitments while maintaining separation from bondholder claims.

What would settle it

Observing a real issuance of regenerative bonds in a network like Sarafu where raising debt-service pressure beyond the modeled frontier causes either missed scheduled service or collapse in mutual-aid circulation would falsify the existence of the guardrail-pass region.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.23922 by Alex (Yeshey) Cahana, Tom Shael, William O. Ruddick.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Conceptual regenerative-bond funding and service architecture. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Pool activity and verified impact-report exposure. Each point is [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Same-token return balance by pool-token pair. Points on the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Final settlement-capacity grid: frontier outcome grid. Strong cells [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Final settlement-capacity grid: simulated settlement motif shares [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Final settlement-capacity grid: scheduled-payment coverage [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p055_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This paper develops regenerative bonds as formal debt instruments whose disclosed use-of-proceeds and governance rules allocate proceeds to locally governed settlement systems designed to strengthen settlement capacity across locally specified productive, ecological, care, mutual-aid, and repair commitments without converting those commitments into investor collateral. It separates bondholder claims from local redeemable commitments and models commitment pools that curate, value, limit, exchange, route, and repair those commitments. Sarafu Network, based in Kenya, provides component evidence on commitment circulation, stable-value interaction, liquidity, topology, and report-linked activity. A Monte Carlo engine calibrated to privacy-safe empirical moments asks whether bond liquidity can act as reusable catalytic funding while preserving issuer responsibility for debt service. Under the reported assumptions, the frontier identifies a modeled guardrail-pass region in which scheduled service is preserved, mutual-aid circulation is maintained or amplified, and bond issuer headroom remains available in lower-stress cells; edge diagnostics show that higher debt-service pressure and capital intensity narrow this region. The contribution is a settlement-architecture framework for evaluating when formal debt can strengthen local capacity to fulfill and repair commitments without becoming hidden household collateral.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper develops regenerative bonds as formal debt instruments with disclosed use-of-proceeds and governance rules that allocate proceeds to locally governed settlement systems strengthening productive, ecological, care, mutual-aid, and repair commitments without converting them into investor collateral. It models commitment pools that curate, value, limit, exchange, route, and repair commitments while separating them from bondholder claims, draws component evidence from Sarafu Network in Kenya on circulation and topology, and deploys a Monte Carlo engine calibrated to privacy-safe empirical moments to identify a guardrail-pass region in which scheduled debt service is preserved, mutual-aid circulation is maintained or amplified, and issuer headroom remains available under lower stress; edge diagnostics indicate that higher debt-service pressure and capital intensity narrow this region.

Significance. If the modeled frontier holds under transparent assumptions, the work supplies a settlement-architecture framework for assessing when formal debt can act as catalytic funding that reinforces rather than extracts from local commitment systems, a contribution relevant to development economics, mutual-aid finance, and regenerative economics. The use of privacy-safe moments from an operational network and the explicit separation of bondholder claims from redeemable commitments are constructive modeling choices.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / Monte Carlo engine] Abstract and Monte Carlo engine description: the central claim that a guardrail-pass region exists in which scheduled service is preserved while mutual-aid circulation is maintained rests on an unspecified Monte Carlo engine whose calibration parameters, stress parameters, and commitment-pool dynamics (curation, valuation, routing, repair, and separation from bondholder claims) are not reported; without equations, pseudocode, or validation against joint distributions, the frontier cannot be distinguished from an artifact of the reduced representation.
  2. [Monte Carlo calibration section] Calibration and guardrail definition: the engine is calibrated to summary empirical moments from Sarafu Network and the guardrail-pass region is defined in terms of those fitted parameters; this creates a circularity risk in which the reported region reduces to the calibration choices rather than an independent test of the settlement architecture, with no out-of-sample diagnostics or topology-preserving checks reported.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'component evidence' from Sarafu Network but does not specify which network statistics (liquidity, topology, report-linked activity) are used as moments versus which are held out for validation.
  2. [Introduction / Model section] Notation for 'commitment pools' and 'regenerative bonds' is introduced without a compact formal definition or diagram showing the separation from bondholder claims.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments on the Monte Carlo engine and calibration procedures in our manuscript. We address each major comment below, indicating revisions that will be incorporated to improve transparency and address the noted risks.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / Monte Carlo engine] Abstract and Monte Carlo engine description: the central claim that a guardrail-pass region exists in which scheduled service is preserved while mutual-aid circulation is maintained rests on an unspecified Monte Carlo engine whose calibration parameters, stress parameters, and commitment-pool dynamics (curation, valuation, routing, repair, and separation from bondholder claims) are not reported; without equations, pseudocode, or validation against joint distributions, the frontier cannot be distinguished from an artifact of the reduced representation.

    Authors: We agree that the current manuscript provides only a high-level description of the Monte Carlo engine. In the revised version we will add a dedicated methods subsection containing the governing equations for commitment-pool curation, valuation, limitation, exchange, routing, and repair, the explicit separation of these from bondholder claims, pseudocode for the simulation loop, the full list of calibration and stress parameters, and validation comparisons of simulated joint distributions against the empirical moments. These additions will enable independent assessment of the guardrail-pass region. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Monte Carlo calibration section] Calibration and guardrail definition: the engine is calibrated to summary empirical moments from Sarafu Network and the guardrail-pass region is defined in terms of those fitted parameters; this creates a circularity risk in which the reported region reduces to the calibration choices rather than an independent test of the settlement architecture, with no out-of-sample diagnostics or topology-preserving checks reported.

    Authors: The calibration relies on privacy-safe summary moments, which is required by data constraints. We acknowledge the circularity risk. The revised manuscript will include a new robustness subsection with out-of-sample diagnostics using parameter perturbations and alternative moment sets, plus topology-preserving permutation tests that compare simulated network metrics to empirical ones. These checks will demonstrate that the guardrail region arises from the modeled settlement dynamics rather than solely from the calibration choices. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper calibrates a Monte Carlo engine to privacy-safe empirical moments drawn from Sarafu Network data and then runs the model across parameter variations to locate a guardrail-pass region defined by independent performance criteria (scheduled debt service preserved, mutual-aid circulation maintained or amplified, issuer headroom available). No equations, self-citations, or derivation steps are exhibited that reduce the reported frontier to the calibration inputs by construction; the simulation structure and output criteria remain external to the fitted moments. This is a standard calibrated-simulation exploration and is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 2 invented entities

The paper introduces new concepts like regenerative bonds and commitment pools, relies on assumptions about their functioning and data representativeness, and uses fitted Monte Carlo parameters from specific network data.

free parameters (2)
  • Monte Carlo calibration parameters
    Calibrated to empirical moments from Sarafu data to define the guardrail region.
  • Stress and capital intensity parameters
    Parameters defining lower-stress cells, debt-service pressure, and capital intensity that narrow the guardrail region.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Commitment pools can curate, value, limit, exchange, route, and repair commitments independently of bondholder claims.
    Central to separating bond claims from local commitments as stated in the abstract.
  • domain assumption Sarafu Network data provides representative empirical moments for commitment circulation, liquidity, and topology.
    Used for calibration of the Monte Carlo engine.
invented entities (2)
  • Regenerative bonds no independent evidence
    purpose: Formal debt instruments with disclosed use-of-proceeds and governance rules for local settlements.
    Newly proposed instrument without external validation mentioned.
  • Commitment pools no independent evidence
    purpose: Systems that curate, value, limit, exchange, route, and repair local commitments.
    Modeled entity central to the separation of claims.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5737 in / 1610 out tokens · 42735 ms · 2026-06-26T05:39:02.941128+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages

  1. [4]

    Barde, Sylvain, and Sander van der Hoog. 2017. An Empirical Validation Protocol for Large-Scale Agent-Based Models . Discussion paper KDPE 1712, University of Kent School of Economics. https://ideas.repec.org/p/ukc/ukcedp/1712.html. Accessed 2026-05-11

    2017

  2. [5]

    Besley, Timothy, Stephen Coate, and Glenn Loury. 1993. The Economics of Rotating Savings and Credit Associations . The American Economic Review 83 (4): 792--810. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2117579. Accessed 2026-05-11

    arXiv 1993

  3. [9]

    Committee on Payment and Settlement Systems , and Technical Committee of IOSCO . 2012. Principles for Financial Market Infrastructures . Technical Report, Bank for International Settlements, Basel. https://www.bis.org/cpmi/publ/d101.htm. Accessed 2026-05-11

    2012

  4. [10]

    Cosmo Local Credit . 2026. sim: Agent-Based Simulation and Monte Carlo Calibration Code. https://github.com/cosmo-local-credit/sim. Accessed 2026-05-23

    2026

  5. [11]

    Cosmo-Local Credit . 2026. Protocol Overview. https://cosmolocal.credit/protocol/overview/. Accessed 2026-05-11

    2026

  6. [15]

    Fullerton, John. 2015. Regenerative Capitalism: How Universal Principles and Patterns Will Shape Our New Economy . Technical Report, Capital Institute. https://capitalinstitute.org/regenerative-capitalism/. Accessed 2026-05-11

    2015

  7. [17]

    GOV.UK . 2026. Social Outcomes Partnerships. Updated 2026-03-05. https://www.gov.uk/guidance/social-impact-bonds. Accessed 2026-05-11

    2026

  8. [18]

    Graeber, David. 2011. Debt: The First 5,000 Years . Brooklyn, NY: Melville House

    2011

  9. [19]

    Grassroots Economics . 2026a. CIC Stack Docs . https://github.com/grassrootseconomics/cic-stack-docs. Accessed 2026-05-11

    2026

  10. [20]

    Grassroots Economics . 2026b. erc20-pool. https://github.com/grassrootseconomics/erc20-pool. Accessed 2026-05-11

    2026

  11. [21]

    Ingham, Geoffrey. 2004. The Nature of Money . Cambridge: Polity Press

    2004

  12. [22]

    International Capital Market Association . 2025a. Green Bond Principles: Voluntary Process Guidelines for Issuing Green Bonds. Updated June 2025. https://www.icmagroup.org/sustainable-finance/the-principles-guidelines-and-handbooks/green-bond-principles-gbp. Accessed 2026-05-11

    2025

  13. [23]

    International Capital Market Association . 2025b. Social Bond Principles: Voluntary Process Guidelines for Issuing Social Bonds. Updated June 2025. https://www.icmagroup.org/sustainable-finance/the-principles-guidelines-and-handbooks/social-bond-principles-sbp/. Accessed 2026-05-11

    2025

  14. [24]

    International Monetary Fund , and World Bank . 2014. Revised Guidelines for Public Debt Management . Technical Report, International Monetary Fund and World Bank. https://www.imf.org/en/publications/policy-papers/issues/2016/12/31/revised-guidelines-for-public-debt-management-pp4855. Accessed 2026-05-11

    2014

  15. [25]

    Kropotkin, Peter. 1902. Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution . London: William Heinemann

    1902

  16. [27]

    Mauss, Marcel. 2002. The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies . London: Routledge

    2002

  17. [28]

    Mehrling, Perry. 2011. The New Lombard Street: How the Fed Became the Dealer of Last Resort . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

    2011

  18. [30]

    Minsky, Hyman P. 1986. Stabilizing an Unstable Economy . New Haven, CT: Yale University Press

    1986

  19. [31]

    OECD . 2025. Global Debt Report 2025: Financing Growth in a Challenging Debt Market Environment . Technical Report, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/8ee42b13-en. Accessed 2026-05-11

    work page doi:10.1787/8ee42b13-en 2025

  20. [32]

    Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    1990

  21. [33]

    Polanyi, Karl. 1944. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time . New York, NY: Farrar & Rinehart

    1944

  22. [34]

    Ruddick, William, and Mohamed Sohail Azim. 2026. Sarafu Network Public Dataset. Dataset. Zenodo. Version DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20120190. Concept DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20120189. CC BY 4.0. Accessed 2026-05-17

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.20120190 2026

  23. [36]

    2026a, April

    Ruddick, William O. . 2026a, April. Commitment-Pool Route Graphs for Finance and Mutual Aid. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=6606438 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6606438. Accessed 2026-05-17

    work page doi:10.2139/ssrn.6606438 2026

  24. [37]

    Ruddick, William O. . 2026b. Proto-Social Infrastructure and Stewardship of Commitment Pooling . International Journal of Community Currency Research 30 (1): 80--98. https://www.ijccr.net/article/view/9512. Accessed 2026-05-11

    2026

  25. [38]

    Sahlins, Marshall. 1972. Stone Age Economics . Chicago: Aldine-Atherton

    1972

  26. [39]

    Smith, Linda Tuhiwai. 2012. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples . 2. London: Zed Books

    2012

  27. [42]

    Cosmo Local Credit . 2026a. docs: Cosmo-Local Credit Documentation. https://github.com/cosmo-local-credit/docs. Accessed 2026-05-23

    2026

  28. [43]

    Cosmo Local Credit . 2026b. protocol: Cosmo-Local Credit Protocol Repository. https://github.com/cosmo-local-credit/protocol. Accessed 2026-05-23

    2026

  29. [44]

    Cosmo Local Credit . 2026c. sim: Agent-Based Simulation and Monte Carlo Calibration Code. https://github.com/cosmo-local-credit/sim. Accessed 2026-05-23

    2026

  30. [47]

    Grassroots Economics . 2026. Sarafu Network Repository. https://github.com/grassrootseconomics/sarafu.network. Accessed 2026-05-23

    2026

  31. [51]

    Acemoglu, A

    Daron Acemoglu and Asuman Ozdaglar and Alireza Tahbaz-Salehi , title =. American Economic Review , year =. doi:10.1257/aer.20130456 , note =

    work page doi:10.1257/aer.20130456

  32. [52]

    The Quarterly Journal of Economics , year =

    Siwan Anderson and Jean-Marie Baland , title =. The Quarterly Journal of Economics , year =. doi:10.1162/003355302760193931 , note =

    work page doi:10.1162/003355302760193931

  33. [53]

    Andersen and Hari Balakrishnan and M

    David G. Andersen and Hari Balakrishnan and M. Frans Kaashoek and Robert Morris , title =. Proceedings of the 18th. 2001 , pages =. doi:10.1145/502034.502048 , note =

    work page doi:10.1145/502034.502048 2001

  34. [54]

    The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland , year =

    Shirley Ardener , title =. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland , year =. doi:10.2307/2844382 , note =

    work page doi:10.2307/2844382

  35. [55]

    2017 , note =

    Sylvain Barde and Sander van der Hoog , title =. 2017 , note =

    2017

  36. [56]

    The American Economic Review , year =

    Timothy Besley and Stephen Coate and Glenn Loury , title =. The American Economic Review , year =

  37. [57]

    and Pedersen, Lasse Heje , title=

    Markus K. Brunnermeier and Lasse Heje Pedersen , title =. Review of Financial Studies , year =. doi:10.1093/rfs/hhn098 , note =

    work page doi:10.1093/rfs/hhn098

  38. [58]

    2012 , note =

    Principles for Financial Market Infrastructures , institution =. 2012 , note =

    2012

  39. [59]

    Protocol Overview , year =

  40. [60]

    Review of Asset Pricing Studies , year =

    Darrell Duffie and Haoxiang Zhu , title =. Review of Asset Pricing Studies , year =. doi:10.1093/rapstu/rar001 , note =

    work page doi:10.1093/rapstu/rar001

  41. [61]

    Noe , title =

    Larry Eisenberg and Thomas H. Noe , title =. Management Science , year =. doi:10.1287/mnsc.47.2.236.9835 , note =

    work page doi:10.1287/mnsc.47.2.236.9835

  42. [62]

    SIAM Journal on Computing28(2), 652–673 (1999)

    David Eppstein , title =. 1998 , volume =. doi:10.1137/S0097539795290477 , note =

    work page doi:10.1137/s0097539795290477 1998

  43. [63]

    Liquidity-Saving through Obligation-Clearing and Mutual Credit: An Effective Monetary Innovation for

    Toma. Liquidity-Saving through Obligation-Clearing and Mutual Credit: An Effective Monetary Innovation for. Journal of Risk and Financial Management , year =. doi:10.3390/jrfm13120295 , note =

    work page doi:10.3390/jrfm13120295

  44. [64]

    2015 , note =

    John Fullerton , title =. 2015 , note =

    2015

  45. [65]

    Social Networks , year =

    Laura Forastiere and Davide Del Prete and Valerio Leone Sciabolazza , title =. Social Networks , year =. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2023.07.005 , note =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2023.07.005 2023

  46. [66]

    Economic Development and Cultural Change , year =

    Clifford Geertz , title =. Economic Development and Cultural Change , year =. doi:10.1086/449960 , note =

    work page doi:10.1086/449960

  47. [67]

    David Graeber , title =

  48. [68]

    Voucher Creation , year =

  49. [69]

    Training Guide , year =

  50. [70]

    eth-indexer , year =

  51. [71]

    sim: Agent-Based Simulation and Monte Carlo Calibration Code , year =

  52. [72]

    docs: Cosmo-Local Credit Documentation , year =

  53. [73]

    protocol: Cosmo-Local Credit Protocol Repository , year =

  54. [74]

    Sarafu Network Repository , year =

  55. [75]

    Social Outcomes Partnerships , year =

  56. [76]

    Bonds - FAQs , year =

  57. [77]

    2026 , note =

    Harper, Douglas , title =. 2026 , note =

    2026

  58. [78]

    Loan Definition and Meaning , year =

  59. [79]

    Green Bond Principles: Voluntary Process Guidelines for Issuing Green Bonds , year =

  60. [80]

    Social Bond Principles: Voluntary Process Guidelines for Issuing Social Bonds , year =

  61. [81]

    Geoffrey Ingham , title =

  62. [82]

    Peter Kropotkin , title =

  63. [83]

    Leung , title =

    Michael P. Leung , title =. Econometrica , year =. doi:10.3982/ECTA17841 , note =

    work page doi:10.3982/ecta17841

  64. [84]

    Marcel Mauss , title =

  65. [85]

    Perry Mehrling , title =

  66. [86]

    Messerschmidt , title =

    Donald A. Messerschmidt , title =. Human Organization , year =. doi:10.17730/humo.40.1.k7811l2478272681 , note =

    work page doi:10.17730/humo.40.1.k7811l2478272681

  67. [87]

    Minsky , title =

    Hyman P. Minsky , title =

  68. [88]

    2025 , note =

    Global Debt Report 2025: Financing Growth in a Challenging Debt Market Environment , institution =. 2025 , note =

    2025

  69. [89]

    Elinor Ostrom , title =

  70. [90]

    Karl Polanyi , title =

  71. [91]

    Marshall Sahlins , title =

  72. [92]

    Linda Tuhiwai Smith , title =

  73. [93]

    2014 , note =

    Revised Guidelines for Public Debt Management , institution =. 2014 , note =

    2014

  74. [94]

    Ruddick , title =

    William O. Ruddick , title =. International Journal of Community Currency Research , year =. doi:10.15133/j.ijccr.2023.004 , note =

    work page doi:10.15133/j.ijccr.2023.004 2023

  75. [95]

    Ruddick , title =

    William O. Ruddick , title =. International Journal of Community Currency Research , year =

  76. [96]

    Carolina E. S. Mattsson and Teodoro Criscione and William O. Ruddick , title =. Scientific Data , year =. doi:10.1038/s41597-022-01539-4 , note =

    work page doi:10.1038/s41597-022-01539-4

  77. [97]

    2026 , note =

    Ruddick, William and Sohail Azim, Mohamed , title =. 2026 , note =

    2026

  78. [98]

    Ruddick , title =

    William O. Ruddick , title =. 2026 , month = apr, note =

    2026

  79. [99]

    F. J. A. Bouman , title =. World Development , year =. doi:10.1016/0305-750X(94)00141-K , note =

    work page doi:10.1016/0305-750x(94)00141-k

  80. [100]

    Stephanie Russo Carroll and Ibrahim Garba and Oscar L. Figueroa-Rodriguez and Jarita Holbrook and Raymond Lovett and Simeon Materechera and Mark Parsons and Kay Raseroka and Desi Rodriguez-Lonebear and Robyn Rowe and Rodrigo Sara and Jennifer D. Walker and Jane Anderson and Maui Hudson , title =. Data Science Journal , year =. doi:10.5334/dsj-2020-043 , note =

    work page doi:10.5334/dsj-2020-043 2020

Showing first 80 references.