Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 60 references

Optimal Weak-Type Estimates and Their Applications of Lifted Rough Maximal Operators

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-10 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Lifted rough maximal operators have optimal weak-type bounds precisely when the height exponent avoids a critical range, and the bounds answer a 1996 question on Poisson integrals.

desk verdict Solid, self-contained resolution of the Sjögren–Soria question via a new lifted rough maximal operator; the range of γ is sharp and the proofs are fully written out. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.08277 v1 pith:TKM4WC2J submitted 2026-07-09 math.CA math.APmath.FA

Dachun Yang , Wen Yuan , Yirui Zhao This is my paper
classification math.CAmath.APmath.FA MSC 42B2542B2042B30
keywords liftedroughmaximaloperatorsweak-typeestimatesgeneralizedPoissonintegralsmethodofrotationsHardyspacestruncatedsingularL(logL)kernels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper introduces a family of lifted rough maximal operators that live in the upper half-space and act at a controlled height scale. It proves that these operators satisfy a sharp weak-type estimate with respect to a weighted measure on the half-space if and only if the weight exponent lies outside a short exceptional interval. For p greater than 1 the exceptional set is just the origin; for the endpoint p equals 1 the Orlicz condition on the angular kernel is needed and the exceptional set grows to a closed interval of length n. The estimates recover classical strong bounds when the lift is removed, yet they are fine enough to control generalized Poisson integrals without any logarithmic integrability on the radial profile, settling an open question of Sjögren and Soria. The same machinery shows that the lifted version of the rotation-method maximal operator is weak type (1,1) even though its unlifted counterpart is not, and yields a new characterization of the Hardy space H^1 by truncated rough singular integrals.

What carries the argument

A dyadic decomposition of nonnegative L^1 functions into “bad cubes” (maximal or minimal according to the sign of the height exponent) together with a height decomposition of the rough kernel; the resulting level-set estimates for the discretized dyadic functionals are controlled by a sparse-type covering argument that replaces the isotropic geometric covering used for the unrough case.

What would settle it

Construct a single nonnegative function in L^1 whose angular kernel is merely integrable (not L(log L)) and check whether the weak-type integral for the lifted operator remains finite for some height exponent inside (-n,0); divergence would falsify the necessity of the Orlicz condition.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For a nontrivial integrable angular kernel, the family of lifted rough maximal operators satisfies the weak-type bound (1.3) for every L^p function (p>1) if and only if the height exponent is nonzero; under the stronger L(log L) condition the endpoint bound (1.4) holds if and only if the exponent lies in (-∞,-n)∪(0,∞). The constants are independent of both the function and the scale parameter.

Load-bearing premise

The endpoint theory for p=1 requires the angular kernel to lie in the Orlicz space L(log L); without that extra integrability the key level-set estimate fails.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper introduces the family of lifted rough maximal operators M_ heta^ heta in the upper half-space and proves optimal weak-type estimates for them. For p ∈ (1, ∞) and Ω ∈ L^{1}(S^{n-1}) nontrivial, the estimate (1.3) holds for all f ∈ L^p if and only if γ eq 0. For the endpoint p = 1 and Ω ∈ L(log L), the estimate (1.4) holds if and only if γ ∈ (-∞, -n) ∪ (0, ∞). The proofs rely on dyadic decompositions into (D, f)-bad cubes (Lemmas 2.1–2.2), a height decomposition of Ω, and a key level-set estimate for the resulting dyadic functionals (Lemma 2.3). Necessity is established by explicit counter-examples (Theorem 2.6) that use lower bounds on kernel averages (Lemmas 2.7–2.9). Applications include weak-type bounds for generalized Poisson integrals without logarithmic assumptions on the radial profile (Theorem 3.1, answering Sjögren–Soria), weak-type (1,1) bounds for the lifted rotation operator M*_Ω (Theorem 3.4), and a Cotlar-type inequality that yields a weak-type characterization of truncated rough singular integrals and a new H^{1} characterization (Theorem 3.8, Corollary 3.9).

Significance. The work extends the isotropic lifting theory of Dai–Li–Yang–Yuan–Zhao to rough kernels and obtains the sharp range of the weight parameter γ. The answer to the Sjögren–Soria question (no logarithmic integrability needed for α < 0) is a concrete advance, and the observation that the lifted rotation operator is weak-type (1,1) while the unlifted one is not is striking. The new H^{1} characterization via truncated rough singular integrals under an L(log L)-Dini condition is a natural and useful addition to the real-variable theory of Hardy spaces. The arguments are self-contained analytic proofs that rest only on classical facts (Calderón–Zygmund rotation, Seeger’s weak-type bound, Aoki–Rolewicz) and on the authors’ earlier isotropic paper; there are no free parameters or circular steps.

minor comments (5)
  1. In the abstract and Theorem 1.1 the family is indexed by heta ∈ (0, ∞), while the body works with heta ∈ (0,1) and reduces to M^Ω via the change of variables t o heta t. A one-sentence clarification that the two formulations are equivalent would avoid a momentary mismatch for the reader.
  2. Lemma 2.3(i) states that the implicit constant depends only on n, yet the subsequent applications (e.g., Theorem 2.5) also track dependence on γ. It would be cleaner to record the γ-dependence explicitly in the statement of the lemma.
  3. In the proof of Theorem 3.1 the entropy sum is bounded by a convergent series involving (k+1)2^{-kγ} x_k; a brief remark that the same argument works for any γ > 0 (not merely γ ∈ (0,1)) would make the range transparent.
  4. Several places use the abbreviation “L” for L(log L)(S^{n-1}) after page 25; introducing the abbreviation once in a displayed line would improve readability.
  5. Typographical: “Su fficiency” and “di fferent” appear with a space before the ligature throughout; these are harmless but easily cleaned.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the optimal weak-type estimates for lifted rough maximal operators are proved by self-contained dyadic decompositions and classical bounds, with only a non-load-bearing self-citation to the isotropic precursor.

  1. self citation load bearing [Introduction, Remark 1.2 and comparison with (1.2)]
    "Theorem 1.1 when Ω ≡ 1 coincides with (1.2). To the best of our knowledge, Theorem 1.1 in other cases are new. … As in the proof of (1.2), the most involved part of the proof of Theorem 1.1 is the one of (1.4) for p=1 and γ∈(-∞,-n)∪(0,∞). However, the ideas behind the proof of (1.4) are essentially different from the ones of (1.2)."

    The paper cites its own isotropic precursor [22] for the special case Ω≡1 and for motivational comparison. The citation is not load-bearing: the rough-kernel argument (bad-cube decompositions + height decomposition of Ω) is written out in full and does not rely on any uniqueness or covering lemma from [22]. The self-citation is therefore minor and does not force the main result.

full rationale

The central claim (Theorem 1.1) is established by an independent analytic argument. Sufficiency for p>1 reduces to the classical strong-(p,p) bound of M_Ω (Theorem A, Calderón–Zygmund) plus a change of variables (display (2.26)). The endpoint p=1 uses a new dyadic decomposition into (D,f)-bad cubes (Lemmas 2.1–2.2) together with a height decomposition of Ω that yields the level-set control of Lemma 2.3; the only place L(log L) appears is the classical Orlicz integrability already required for the unlifted operator. Necessity is obtained by explicit counter-examples (Theorem 2.6) that rely on lower bounds for kernel averages (Lemmas 2.7–2.9). Applications (generalized Poisson integrals, lifted M*Ω, H^{1} characterization) follow from the same estimates plus standard tools (Stein–N. Weiss adding-up lemma, Aoki–Rolewicz, Seeger’s weak-type bound). The sole self-citation is to the authors’ earlier isotropic lifting paper [22], used only for comparison and for the isotropic special case of (1.2); it is not invoked as a uniqueness theorem or as a load-bearing premise for the rough-kernel estimates. No fitted parameters, self-definitional loops, or renaming of known results appear. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external classical benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The paper works entirely within classical real-variable harmonic analysis. The only non-standard inputs are the L(log L) integrability of the kernel (a domain assumption inherited from Christ–Rubio de Francia) and the L(log L)-Dini condition used for the singular-integral applications. No free parameters are fitted; the operators and the measure d u_γ are defined explicitly.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Ω ∈ L(log L)(S^{n-1}) is required for the weak-type (1,1) theory of both the classical and the lifted rough maximal operators.
    Invoked from the classical result of Christ–Rubio de Francia (Theorem A) and used throughout §2.2–2.3 and §3.
  • standard math The rough singular integral T_Ω is weak-type (1,1) when Ω ∈ L(log L) (Seeger).
    Cited as [47] and used in the Cotlar inequality of Proposition 3.7 and the H^{1} characterization.
  • standard math Aoki–Rolewicz theorem supplies a quasi-triangle inequality for the weak L^{1} quasi-norm.
    Used in the proofs of Theorems 3.4 and 3.8 to sum the series of lifted operators.
invented entities (2)
  • lifted rough maximal operator M_ heta^Ω independent evidence
    purpose: Provides a multi-scale, height-restricted version of the classical rough maximal function whose weak-type behavior can be controlled optimally.
    Defined in the introduction and studied throughout; independent evidence is the classical isotropic case of Dai et al. and the applications derived from it.
  • lifted rotation operator M*_Ω independent evidence
    purpose: Shows that lifting restores weak-type (1,1) even though the unlifted operator fails it.
    Defined by (3.8); its weak-type bound is Theorem 3.4.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Optimal Weak-Type Estimates and Their Applications of Lifted Rough Maximal Operators." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TKM4WC2J

@misc{pith2026260708277,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Optimal Weak-Type Estimates and Their Applications of Lifted Rough Maximal Operators},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TKM4WC2J}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.08277}
}
abstract

Let $n\in\mathbb N\cap[2,\infty)$ and $\Omega\in L^1(\mathbb S^{n-1})$ with $\Omega\not\equiv 0$. In this article, we introduce a new family of lifted rough maximal operators $\{\mathcal{M}_\theta^\Omega\}_{\theta\in(0,\infty)}$ in the upper-half plane and establish their optimal weak-type estimates. Specifically, we prove that, for any $p \in (1, \infty)$, the estimate, with the positive equivalence constants independent of $f$, \[ \sup_{\theta,\lambda\in(0,\infty)}\lambda^p \underset{{\mathcal M}^\Omega_\theta(f)(x,t) > \lambda t^\frac{\gamma}{p}} {\int_{\mathbb R^n}\int_0^\infty} t^{\gamma-1}\,dt\,dx \sim \|f\|_{L^p(\mathbb{R}^n)}^p \] holds for all $f\in L^p(\mathbb R^n)$ if and only if $\gamma\in\mathbb R\setminus\{0\}$. For the endpoint case $p=1$ and $\Omega \in L(\log L)(\mathbb{S}^{n-1})$, we prove that the above estimate holds if and only if $\gamma \in (-\infty, -n) \cup (0, \infty)$. As applications, we obtain weak-type estimates for generalized Poisson integrals without any logarithmic integrability assumptions, which gives an affirmative answer to the question posed by Sj\"ogren and Soria in page 228 of [Israel J. Math. 95 (1996)]. Moreover, although the operator $M^\ast_\Omega$, arising from the method of rotation of Calder\'on and Zygmund, is not of weak type $(1,1)$, we find that its lifted variant is weak type $(1,1)$. In addition, we establish a new characterization of Hardy spaces in terms of truncated rough singular integrals.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Bhojak and P

    A. Bhojak and P . Mohanty, Weak type bounds for rough maximal singular integrals near L1, J. Funct. Anal. 284 (2023), Paper No. 109881, 27 pp

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    An alternate approach to bilinear rough singular integrals

    A. Bhojak and S. Shrivastava, An alternate approach to bilinear rough singular integrals, arXiv:2508.19181

    work page Pith review arXiv

  3. [3]

    Bhojak and S

    A. Bhojak and S. Shrivastava, Endpoint variation and jump inequalities for rough singular integrals, arXiv:2602.21888

    work page arXiv

  4. [4]

    Brezis, A

    H. Brezis, A. Seeger, J. V an Schaftingen and P .-L. Y ung, Families of functionals representing Sobolev norms, Anal. PDE 17 (2024), 943–979

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Brezis, J

    H. Brezis, J. V an Schaftingen and P .-L. Y ung, A surprising formula for Sobolev norms, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118 (2021), Paper No. e2025254118, 6 pp

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    T. A. Bui, Weighted Hardy spaces associated to discrete Laplacians on graphs and applica- tions, Potential Anal. 41 (2014), 817–848

    work page 2014

  7. [7]

    T. A. Bui, Hardy spaces, Campanato spaces and higher order Riesz transforms associated with Bessel operators, J. Fourier Anal. Appl. 32 (2026), Paper No. 39, 48 pp

    work page 2026

  8. [8]

    T. A. Bui, J. M. Conde-Alonso, X. T. Duong and M. Hormozi, A note on weighted bounds for singular operators with nonsmooth kernels, Studia Math. 236 (2017), 245–269

    work page 2017

Show all 60 references
  1. [9]

    T. A. Bui and X. T. Duong, Sharp weighted norm inequalities for singular integrals with non-smooth kernels, Math. Z. 295 (2020), 1733–1750

    2020

  2. [10]

    A. P . Calderón and A. Zygmund, On singular integrals, Amer. J. Math. 78 (1956), 289–309

    1956

  3. [11]

    M. J. Carro, From restricted weak type to strong type estimates, J. London Math. Soc. (2) 70 (2004), 750–762

    2004

  4. [12]

    Chanillo, D

    S. Chanillo, D. K. Watson and R. L. Wheeden, Some integral and maximal operators related to starlike sets, Studia Math. 107 (1993), 223–255

    1993

  5. [13]

    Y . Chen, Y . Ding, G. Hong and H. Liu, V ariational inequalities for the commutators of rough operators with BMO functions, Sci. China Math. 64 (2021), 2437–2460

    2021

  6. [14]

    Y . Chen, Y . Ding, G. Hong and H. Liu, Weighted jump and variational inequalities for rough operators, J. Funct. Anal. 274 (2018), 2446–2475

    2018

  7. [15]

    Y . Chen, G. Hong and J. Li, Quantitative weighted bounds for the q-variation of singular integrals with rough kernels, J. Fourier Anal. Appl. 29 (2023), Paper No. 31, 50 pp

    2023

  8. [16]

    Christ, Weak type (1, 1) bounds for rough operators, Ann

    M. Christ, Weak type (1, 1) bounds for rough operators, Ann. of Math. (2) 128 (1988), 19–42

    1988

  9. [17]

    Christ and J

    M. Christ and J. L. Rubio de Francia, Weak type (1 , 1) bounds for rough operators. II, Invent. Math. 93 (1988), 225–237

    1988

  10. [18]

    R. R. Coifman, A real variable characterization of H p, Studia Math. 51 (1974), 269–274

    1974

  11. [19]

    R. R. Coifman, P .-L. Lions, Y . Meyer and S. Semmes, Compacité par compensation et es- paces de Hardy, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math. 309 (1989), 945–949

    1989

  12. [20]

    R. R. Coifman, P .-L. Lions, Y . Meyer and S. Semmes, Compensated compactness and Hardy spaces, J. Math. Pures Appl. (9) 72 (1993), 247–286

    1993

  13. [21]

    Cruz-Uribe and L.-A

    D. Cruz-Uribe and L.-A. D. Wang, V ariable Hardy spaces, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 63 (2014), 447–493

    2014

  14. [22]

    F. Dai, Y . Li, D. Y ang, W. Y uan and Y . Zhao, Sharp weak-type estimate for local lifted Hardy– Littlewood maximal operators with applications to generators of linear operator families and Hardy(–Sobolev) spaces, Adv. Math. 490 (2026), Paper No. 110822, 55 pp

    2026

  15. [23]

    F. Dai, X. Lin, D. Y ang, W. Y uan and Y . Zhang, Poincaré inequality meets Brezis–V an Schaftingen–Y ung formula on metric measure spaces, J. Funct. Anal. 283 (2022), Paper No. 109645, 52 pp

    2022

  16. [24]

    Ding and X

    Y . Ding and X. Lai, Weak type (1, 1) behavior for the maximal operator with L1-Dini kernel, Potential Anal. 47 (2017), 169–187

    2017

  17. [25]

    Ding and X

    Y . Ding and X. Lai, L1-Dini conditions and limiting behavior of weak type estimates for singular integrals, Rev. Mat. Iberoam. 33 (2017), 1267–1284. 32 Dachun Yang, Wen Yuan, and Yirui Zhao

    2017

  18. [26]

    Domínguez and M

    O. Domínguez and M. Milman, New Brezis–V an Schaftingen–Y ung–Sobolev type inequal- ities connected with maximal inequalities and one parameter families of operators, Adv. Math. 411 (2022), Paper No. 108774, 76 pp

    2022

  19. [27]

    L. C. Evans and S. Müller, Hardy spaces and the two-dimensional Euler equations with nonnegative vorticity, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 7 (1994), 199–219

    1994

  20. [28]

    Fefferman and E

    C. Fefferman and E. M. Stein, H p spaces of several variables, Acta Math. 129 (1972), 137– 193

    1972

  21. [29]

    R. A. Fe fferman, A theory of entropy in Fourier analysis, Adv. Math. 30 (1978), 171–201

    1978

  22. [30]

    Ho, Atomic decomposition of Hardy spaces and characterization of BMO via Banach function spaces, Anal

    K.-P . Ho, Atomic decomposition of Hardy spaces and characterization of BMO via Banach function spaces, Anal. Math. 38 (2012), 173–185

    2012

  23. [31]

    Ho, Atomic decomposition of Hardy–Morrey spaces with variable exponents, Ann

    K.-P . Ho, Atomic decomposition of Hardy–Morrey spaces with variable exponents, Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Math. 40 (2015), 31–62

    2015

  24. [32]

    Ho and Y

    K.-P . Ho and Y . Sawano, New characterization of Morrey–Herz spaces and Morrey–Herz– Hardy spaces with applications to various linear operators, Acta Math. Sin. (Engl. Ser.) 41 (2025), 327–354

    2025

  25. [33]

    G. Hu, X. Lai, X. Tao and Q. Xue, An endpoint estimate for the maximal Calderón commu- tator with rough kernel, Math. Ann. 392 (2025), 2469–2502

    2025

  26. [34]

    S. M. Hudson, A covering lemma for maximal operators with unbounded kernels, Michigan Math. J. 34 (1987), 147–151

    1987

  27. [35]

    Izuki, T

    M. Izuki, T. Nogayama, T. Noi and Y . Sawano, Weighted local Hardy spaces with variable exponents, Math. Nachr. 296 (2023), 5710–5785

    2023

  28. [36]

    L. D. Ky, New Hardy spaces of Musielak–Orlicz type and boundedness of sublinear opera- tors, Integral Equations Operator Theory 78 (2014), 115–150

    2014

  29. [37]

    Lai, Noncommutative maximal operators with rough kernels, Anal

    X. Lai, Noncommutative maximal operators with rough kernels, Anal. PDE 17 (2024), 1439– 1471

    2024

  30. [38]

    Lai, Weak (1 , 1) estimate for maximal truncated rough singular integral operator, arXiv:2508.17737

    X. Lai, Weak (1 , 1) estimate for maximal truncated rough singular integral operator, arXiv:2508.17737

  31. [39]

    Lu, Four Lectures on Real H p Spaces, World Scientific Publishing Co., Inc., River Edge, NJ, 1995

    S.-Z. Lu, Four Lectures on Real H p Spaces, World Scientific Publishing Co., Inc., River Edge, NJ, 1995

    1995

  32. [40]

    Menárguez and F

    T. Menárguez and F. Soria, Estimates for generalized Poisson integrals in a half space, in: Harmonic Analysis and Operator Theory (Caracas, 1994), pp. 387–392, Contemp. Math. 189, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1995

    1994

  33. [41]

    Müller, Hardy space methods for nonlinear partial di fferential equations, Tatra Mt

    S. Müller, Hardy space methods for nonlinear partial di fferential equations, Tatra Mt. Math. Publ. 4 (1994), 159–168

    1994

  34. [42]

    Nakai and Y

    E. Nakai and Y . Sawano, Hardy spaces with variable exponents and generalized Campanato spaces, J. Funct. Anal. 262 (2012), 3665–3748

    2012

  35. [43]

    Nakai and Y

    E. Nakai and Y . Sawano, Orlicz–Hardy spaces and their duals, Sci. China Math. 57 (2014), 903–962

    2014

  36. [44]

    M. Qin, H. Wu, Q. Xue, Q. Y ang and Q. Zhang, The limiting weak type behaviors for rough operators with L log L(Sn1) kernels, and characterizations, Calc. V ar. Partial Di fferential Equations 65 (2026), Paper No. 147, 49 pp

    2026

  37. [45]

    Sawano, Theory of Besov Spaces, Dev

    Y . Sawano, Theory of Besov Spaces, Dev. Math. 56, Springer, Singapore, 2018

    2018

  38. [46]

    A. R. Schep, Minkowski’s integral inequality for function norms, in: Operator Theory in Function Spaces and Banach Lattices, pp. 299–308, Oper. Theory Adv. Appl. 75, Birkhäuser, Basel, 1995

    1995

  39. [47]

    Seeger, Singular integral operators with rough convolution kernels, J

    A. Seeger, Singular integral operators with rough convolution kernels, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 9 (1996), 95–105

    1996

  40. [48]

    Seeger and T

    A. Seeger and T. Tao, Sharp Lorentz space estimates for rough operators, Math. Ann. 320 (2001), 381–415. Lifted Rough Maximal Operators 33

    2001

  41. [49]

    Sjögren, Characterizations of Poisson integrals on symmetric spaces, Math

    P . Sjögren, Characterizations of Poisson integrals on symmetric spaces, Math. Scand. 49 (1981), 229–249

    1981

  42. [50]

    Sjögren, Generalized Poisson integrals in a half-space and weak L1, J

    P . Sjögren, Generalized Poisson integrals in a half-space and weak L1, J. London Math. Soc. (2) 27 (1983), 85–96

    1983

  43. [51]

    Sjögren and F

    P . Sjögren and F. Soria, Weak type (1 , 1) estimates for some integral operators related to rough maximal functions, Israel J. Math. 95 (1996), 211–229

    1996

  44. [52]

    Sjögren and F

    P . Sjögren and F. Soria, Rough maximal functions and rough singular integral operators applied to integrable radial functions, Rev. Mat. Iberoamericana 13 (1997), 1–18

    1997

  45. [53]

    Soria, Characterizations of classes of functions generated by blocks and associated Hardy spaces, Indiana Univ

    F. Soria, Characterizations of classes of functions generated by blocks and associated Hardy spaces, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 34 (1985), 463–492

    1985

  46. [54]

    E. M. Stein, The analogues of Fatou’s theorem and estimates for maximal functions, in: Geometry of Homogeneous Bounded Domains (C.I.M.E., 3 Ciclo, Urbino, 1967), pp. 291– 307, Centro Internazionale Matematico Estivo (C.I.M.E.), Ed. Cremonese, Rome, 1968

    1967

  47. [55]

    E. M. Stein, Singular Integrals and Differentiability Properties of Functions, Princeton Math- ematical Series 30, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1970

    1970

  48. [56]

    E. M. Stein, Harmonic Analysis: Real-V ariable Methods, Orthogonality, and Oscillatory In- tegrals, Princeton Mathematical Series 43, Monographs in Harmonic Analysis III, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1993

    1993

  49. [57]

    E. M. Stein and G. Weiss, On the theory of harmonic functions of several variables, I: the theory of H p spaces, Acta Math. 103 (1960), 25–62

    1960

  50. [58]

    E. M. Stein and N. J. Weiss, On the convergence of Poisson integrals, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 140 (1969), 35–54

    1969

  51. [59]

    Uchiyama, A constructive proof of the Fefferman-Stein decomposition of BMO(Rn), Acta Math

    A. Uchiyama, A constructive proof of the Fefferman-Stein decomposition of BMO(Rn), Acta Math. 148 (1982), 215–241

    1982

  52. [60]

    Y ang, Y

    D. Y ang, Y . Liang and L. Ky, Real-V ariable Theory of Musielak–Orlicz Hardy Spaces, Lec- ture Notes in Mathematics 2182, Springer, Cham, 2017. Dachun Y ang (Corresponding author), Wen Y uan and Yirui Zhao Laboratory of Mathematics and Complex Systems (Ministry of Education o...

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed July 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.