Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Multi-FR: A Multi-objective Optimization Framework for Multi-stakeholder Fairness-aware Recommendation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2105.02951 v3 pith:TKTAY2LE submitted 2021-05-06 cs.IR

classification cs.IR
keywords fairnessrecommendationconsumersframeworkmulti-frstakeholdersaccuracyconstraints
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Nowadays, most online services are hosted on multi-stakeholder marketplaces, where consumers and producers may have different objectives. Conventional recommendation systems, however, mainly focus on maximizing consumers' satisfaction by recommending the most relevant items to each individual. This may result in unfair exposure of items, thus jeopardizing producer benefits. Additionally, they do not care whether consumers from diverse demographic groups are equally satisfied. To address these limitations, we propose a multi-objective optimization framework for fairness-aware recommendation, Multi-FR, that adaptively balances accuracy and fairness for various stakeholders with Pareto optimality guarantee. We first propose four fairness constraints on consumers and producers. In order to train the whole framework in an end-to-end way, we utilize the smooth rank and stochastic ranking policy to make these fairness criteria differentiable and friendly to back-propagation. Then, we adopt the multiple gradient descent algorithm to generate a Pareto set of solutions, from which the most appropriate one is selected by the Least Misery Strategy. The experimental results demonstrate that Multi-FR largely improves recommendation fairness on multiple stakeholders over the state-of-the-art approaches while maintaining almost the same recommendation accuracy. The training efficiency study confirms our model's ability to simultaneously optimize different fairness constraints for many stakeholders efficiently.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Uncertainty as Remedy: Mitigating Satisfaction Label Bias in Short Video Multi-Objective Ensemble Ranking

    cs.IR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    UAME models each predicted satisfaction score as a Gaussian with learned variance, then uses that variance to up-weight conflicting item pairs in a probabilistic pairwise ranking loss, improving multi-objective short-...

Pith tools