Integrity report for APM: Evaluating Style Personalization in LLMs with Arbitrary Preference Mappings

A machine-verified record of the checks Pith has run against this paper: detector runs, findings, signed bundle events, and canonical identifiers.

arXiv:2605.21063 · pith:2026:TNWWX7VIJXZXLWDQVYUET2ROAC

0Critical

0Advisory

6Detectors run

2026-06-03Last checked

Paper page arXiv integrity.json bundle.json

Detector runs

doi_title_agreement completed v1.0.0 · findings 0 · 2026-06-03 16:05:44.255066+00:00

doi_compliance completed v1.0.0 · findings 0 · 2026-05-28 12:16:12.936809+00:00

ai_meta_artifact completed v1.0.0 · findings 0 · 2026-05-28 04:37:51.927058+00:00

claim_evidence completed v1.0.0 · findings 0 · 2026-05-26 11:04:07.554703+00:00

citation_quote_validity completed v0.1.0 · findings 0 · 2026-05-21 11:50:09.994396+00:00

cited_work_retraction completed v1.0.0 · findings 0 · 2026-05-21 08:22:36.609996+00:00

Findings

No public integrity findings for this paper.

Signed record

The machine-readable record for this paper lives at /pith/TNWWX7VIJXZXLWDQVYUET2ROAC/integrity.json. Pith Number bundles also include signed pith.integrity.v1 events where a Pith Number exists.