Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 6 minor 53 references

Maximal rigidity of random measure and uniqueness pairs: stealthy processes, quasicrystals and periodicity

T0 review · 5 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Quasicrystal-type random measures are maximally rigid: any cone with non-empty interior determines the whole process, and a natural finite-range field is rigid inside radius 2/pi but free outside radius 2.

desk verdict Worth sending to a serious referee: the framework and the quasicrystal/periodicity results are genuinely new, but the stealthy-cone proof has a distribution-theoretic gap and the claimed phase transition is not actually sharp. read the letter →

arxiv 2512.10686 v2 pith:TNYMAOYK submitted 2025-12-11 math.PR

Raphaël Lachièze-Rey (MATHNET , MAP5 - UMR 8145) This is my paper
classification math.PR MSC 60G1060G5560G6042B1030D15
keywords maximalrigidityperfectinterpolationrandommeasuresspectralmeasurestealthyprocessesquasicrystalsperiodicityuniquenesspairs
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper generalizes the classical Kolmogorov-Wiener prediction theorem, where a stationary time series is fully determined by its past when its spectrum has a gap, to higher-dimensional random measures and fields. Its central claim is that the right organizing concept is the 'uniqueness pair' of harmonic analysis: the paper proves a characterization (Theorem 1) reducing linear maximal rigidity to a spectral support condition. From this it derives maximal rigidity on cones for stealthy processes (spectral gap) and, more strikingly, for quasicrystals (purely atomic spectrum), where any cone with non-empty interior determines the entire configuration. It also shows that discrete integer-valued fields with simply connected spectrum are necessarily periodic, and identifies a finite-range Gaussian field that is perfectly interpolable inside a small ball but shows no rigidity outside a larger ball, a genuine phase transition. If the paper is right, partial observations on arbitrarily small cones or on the exterior of a small ball can completely determine a wide class of stationary random structures.

What carries the argument

The core device is the spectral measure S attached to a weakly stationary random measure, coupled with the 'uniqueness pair' concept: two sets, one in space and one in Fourier space, that cannot simultaneously support a nonzero function and its Fourier transform. Theorem 1 reduces linear maximal rigidity to the statement that every nonzero L2(S) perturbation phi*S has Fourier spectrum intersecting the observation set; all later results are uniqueness-pair applications. The phase-transition argument additionally uses Jensen's identity to bound the density of zeros of an entire function of exponential type, applied to the Bessel-function spectral density of the triangle-covariance field.

What would settle it

For the triangle-covariance field, compute the L2 projection error of X(0) onto the closed span of X(x) with |x| > rho for rho = 0.5 (below 2/pi). The paper predicts error zero; a strictly positive error would disprove the rigidity half of Theorem 8. Equivalently, constructing a non-zero tempered distribution with spectrum supported in B(0,2) and Fourier transform vanishing on the union of spheres of radii k pi/2 would falsify the underlying uniqueness pair.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For a weakly stationary random measure, the paper establishes that perfect interpolation from a set A is equivalent to: every nonzero square-integrable perturbation of the spectral measure has Fourier spectrum intersecting A; when the spectral measure vanishes on the complement of A in frequency space, this forces the perturbation to vanish. Applied to stealthy measures (spectral gap), this yields maximal rigidity on every closed strictly convex cone. Applied to purely atomic spectra, it yields perfect interpolation from any cone with non-empty interior, meaning a quasicrystal is entirely determined by an arbitrarily small cone. Applied to discrete integer-valued fields, simple connectedness

Load-bearing premise

The argument needs the spectral-gap information to survive convolution with a smoothing kernel: if smoothing blurs the gap or fails to produce a genuine function, the cone-rigidity conclusion for stealthy processes is unsupported.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If atomic spectrum implies that any cone with non-empty interior determines the whole process, then quasicrystal configurations have trivial tail sigma-algebras: no extra information remains at infinity beyond the configuration itself.
  • Stealthy processes are recoverable from any strictly convex cone, extending the previously known bounded-set rigidity; reconstruction is a Hilbert-space projection and only needs the covariance structure.
  • Discrete integer-valued stationary fields with simply connected spectrum are almost surely periodic, and under ergodicity the period is deterministic and the spectrum is finite.
  • The triangle-covariance field is a finite-range, non-hyperuniform, continuous Gaussian field that nonetheless allows perfect prediction of points inside a small ball from outside points, with coefficients computable by Fourier analysis.
  • Theorem 1 gives a general recipe: any new uniqueness pair in harmonic analysis immediately yields new maximal-rigidity examples for random measures whose spectral measure vanishes appropriately.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same uniqueness-pair machinery could probe the conjectural existence of disordered stealthy point processes: if a stationary disordered model existed, Theorem 4 would force it to be determined by any strictly convex cone, a testable signature in simulations.
  • The phase transition likely has a sharp critical radius somewhere in [2/pi, 2]; locating it may amount to determining the optimal zero-density constant for entire functions vanishing on the zeros of the Bessel function.
  • Theorem 7 suggests a broader dichotomy for discrete-valued fields: either the spectrum is thin in a complex-analytic sense (simply connected or polynomially convex support) and the field is periodic, or the support contains enough topology to allow aperiodic behavior.
  • For signal processing, the triangle-covariance rigidity implies a concrete finite-range sensing scheme: readings taken outside a small ball can reconstruct the field inside it, with explicit coefficients from the spectral density.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper develops a general framework, based on uniqueness pairs and the spectral measure of a weakly stationary random measure, for linear maximal rigidity (perfect interpolation). Theorem 1 characterizes LMR on a set A by the absence of non-zero φ∈L²(S) whose Fourier spectrum is disjoint from A. The main applications are: (i) stealthy random measures, i.e. those with a spectral gap, are LMR on strictly convex cones (Theorem 4); (ii) random measures with purely atomic spectrum are perfectly interpolable from any cone with non-empty interior (Theorem 6); (iii) strongly stationary integer-valued fields on Z^d with simply connected spectrum are a.s. periodic (Theorem 7); (iv) a Gaussian-type field with covariance Δ=1_{B(0,1)}*1_{B(0,1)} is LMR on B(0,ρ) for ρ<2/π and has no LMR on B(0,ρ) for ρ>2 (Theorem 8). The paper also contains tensorization results, weak-stealthiness variants, a non-simply-connected counterexample, and a reconstruction discussion.

Significance. The results, if correctly proved, are significant. They give multidimensional and continuous extensions of Kolmogorov-Wiener prediction theory, connect rigidity to uniqueness pairs, unify and strengthen earlier results on stealthy processes and quasicrystals, and exhibit a surprising rigidity phase transition for a finite-range covariance. The spectral criterion in Theorem 1 is clean and should be useful. A particular strength is the self-contained proof of Lemma 2 for atomic measures on T^d, which is elegant. The paper is also well situated in the literature and discusses open questions. However, several load-bearing technical steps are currently incomplete or insufficiently justified, so the paper cannot be accepted in its present form.

major comments (5)
  1. [§2.2, proof of Theorem 4] The distributional extension of Shapiro's theorem is not justified. After defining ψ=Ψ∗κ, the proof asserts that Shapiro's theorem (Theorem 5) applies. But Theorem 5 requires ψ to be a tempered function with ∫_{B^c}|ψ(t)|e^{δ|t|}dt<∞ for a minor cone B. No such exponential decay is proved; ψ is only a convolution of a tempered measure with a Schwartz kernel, which gives smoothness and at most polynomial growth. The fact that Fψ=\hatκ FΨ is supported by B gives a spectral gap, not the required decay of ψ. Moreover, the final step 'ψ≡0 for all such κ implies FΨ=0' is not automatic, since one only obtains \hatκ FΨ=0 for κ supported in a small ball. Please either prove a valid distributional version of Shapiro's theorem, supply the missing decay estimate, or restrict Theorem 4 to cases where φS has a density.
  2. [§3.4, proof of Proposition 6] The proof partitions the set Ω of configurations determined by finite blocks into finite translation-equivalence classes Ω_j and uses the equal probabilities P(X=ω)=P(X=ω′) to conclude that each Ω_j has a period. The finiteness of Ω_j is asserted without proof. For arbitrary deterministic extension maps ψ_{n0}, a configuration determined from a finite cube can have an infinite orbit under translations. The argument needs the maps φ_n to be translation-equivariant and consistent, or a separate proof that each such orbit is finite. Without this, the conclusion that X is a.s. periodic does not follow from the displayed Borel–Cantelli bound.
  3. [§4.1, proof of Theorem 8] The key isotropization step relies on [LR24, Lemma 7], which is not stated or proved in the paper. This lemma is essential: it converts an arbitrary non-zero entire function in L²(s^{-1}) of exponential type <2/π into an isotropic one with the same vanishing properties, allowing the use of the one-dimensional Jensen lemma. Please state the lemma and either prove it or provide a precise, accessible reference. In addition, the theorem proves rigidity for ρ<2/π, while the abstract claims ρ≤2/π; the endpoint is not established and may require a separate argument.
  4. [§2.3, Theorem 6 and its proof] The theorem states that a random measure with purely atomic spectrum is perfectly interpolable from 'any cone with non-empty interior', and the proof reduces to the positive orthant by an invertible linear map L with R_+^d⊂L(B). This reduction is valid for convex cones with non-empty interior, but not for arbitrary homogeneous sets that are not convex. The term 'cone' should be defined precisely in the statement; if the result is intended for all cones, the linear-reduction step must be justified.
  5. [§4.1, non-rigidity part of Theorem 8] The covariance calculation shows that X(f) is decorrelated from X(h) when f is supported in B(0,ε) and h in B(0,2+ε)^c; this proves absence of LMR on small balls. It implies no LMR on B(0,ρ) for ρ>2 by choosing ε<ρ−2, but it does not prove the theorem's stated conclusion 'not f-rigid for f with supp(f)=B(0,ρ)'. For a function with full support B(0,ρ), an approximating function supported outside B(0,ρ) can have support arbitrarily close to the ball, so the decorrelation argument does not apply. Please either prove the stronger f-rigidity claim or rephrase the statement.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract and §4.1] The abstract contains 'ρ ___ 2π' and '0<ρ⩽2π'; these should read 'ρ<2/π'. The endpoint ρ=2/π is not proved.
  2. [Theorem 3 and §2.1] Theorem 3 is stated only for a spectral density s. In later applications measures with atoms are allowed; the statement should explicitly refer to the continuous component, as Theorem 2 does.
  3. [§3.4, proof of Lemma 3] There are typos: 'Byenaimé-Tchebyshev' should be 'Bienaymé–Chebyshev', and 'Schwartz’Paley-Wiener' needs a comma.
  4. [§2.3.1] Typo: 'whch' should be 'which'.
  5. [References] The entry [Sto63] appears corrupted: 'Invariants and fundamental functions sigurdur helgason' is not a correct title. Please fix the bibliographic data.
  6. [Introduction and §2.3] The phrase 'concave cones' is confusing. The proof of Theorem 6 works for convex cones with non-empty interior; please align the terminology between the introduction and the theorem statement.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the rigidity theorems are derived from explicit spectral hypotheses via external harmonic-analysis and complex-analysis theorems, not from fitted inputs or definitionally loaded equivalences.

full rationale

Theorem 1 is an exact Hilbert-space characterization: LMR on A iff no nonzero φ ∈ L2(S) has F(φS) supported in A. The paper then applies external theorems to rule out such φ. Theorem 4 invokes Shapiro's theorem (external, 1973) and attempts a distributional extension; whether that extension is fully justified is a proof-rigor question, not a circularity. Theorem 6 uses atomicity and a direct polynomial-approximation lemma (Lemma 2) which is proved in the text. Theorem 7 rests on Stolzenberg's polynomial-convexity theorem and the Oka–Weil theorem. Theorem 8 uses Jensen's identity and Schwartz–Paley–Wiener; the only in-house citation is [LR24, Lemma 7] for an isotropic approximation step, whose hypotheses do not assert the target rigidity conclusion and which functions as an auxiliary technical tool. There are no fitted parameters renamed as predictions, and no theorem is defined in terms of its own conclusion. The self-citations to [LR24]/[LR25] are background/technical and do not carry the central derivations. Score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new entities or fitted constants are introduced. The paper relies on standard spectral theory, uncertainty principles, and complex analysis, but the load-bearing external theorems (Shapiro, Stolzenberg-Oka-Weil) are cited without full proof, and the exact phase transition claim is not fully closed.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Weak stationarity of the random measure with a spectral measure S satisfying the temperedness condition (3)/(5).
    The entire theory is built on weakly stationary random measures; this is the stated framework of the paper (Section 1.1), not an ad hoc assumption.
  • standard math Shapiro's uncertainty theorem for functions with a spectral gap (Theorem 5, quoted from [Sha73]).
    Invoked in Theorem 4 to extend rigidity to cones; the paper attempts to extend it to tempered distributions via convolution.
  • standard math Stolzenberg's theorem that simply connected sets are polynomially convex, and the Oka-Weil theorem.
    Invoked in Section 3.1 for Theorem 7; the author acknowledges that M. Sodin provided this connection, and the paper does not prove it.
  • standard math Jensen's identity and the density-of-zeros bound for entire functions of exponential type (Lemma 4).
    Core tool for Theorem 8, stated as a standard consequence of [Koo88].
  • ad hoc to paper The exact threshold 2/pi in Theorem 8 is asserted with a gap: the derivation shows rigidity for rho < 2/pi and non-rigidity for rho > 2, but not the sharp 'iff' for rho in [2/pi, 2].
    The 'phase transition' is stated as if sharp, but the assumptions used in the proof only establish the strict inequalities; the claimed threshold is not fully closed by the arguments given.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Maximal rigidity of random measure and uniqueness pairs: stealthy processes, quasicrystals and periodicity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TNYMAOYK

@misc{pith2026251210686,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Maximal rigidity of random measure and uniqueness pairs: stealthy processes, quasicrystals and periodicity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TNYMAOYK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2512.10686}
}
abstract

This article investigates the phenomenon of maximal rigidity in spatial processes, where perfect interpolation of the process is possible from partial information, specifically, from its restriction to a strict subdomain, often resulting in a trivial tail $\sigma$algebra. A classical example known since the 1930's is that a time series is fully determined by its values on the negative integers if its spectrum has a gap, or at least a sufficiently deep zero. We extend such results to higher dimensions and continuous settings by establishing a connection with the concept of uniqueness pairs, rooted in the uncertainty principle of harmonic analysis. We present several other manifestations of this principle, unify and strengthen seemingly unrelated results across different models: quasicrystals and stealthy processes are shown to be maximally rigid on cones, and discrete integer-valued processes are necessarily periodic when they have a simply connected spectrum. Finally, we identify a surprising class of continuous fields with seemingly standard behavior, such as linear variance and finite dependency range, that undergo a phase transition: they are perfectly interpolable on B(0, $\rho$) for $\rho$ ___ 2 $\pi$ but exhibit no rigidity for $\rho$ > 2.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.10686 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A non simply connnected spectrum yielding rigidity from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Adhikari, S

    K. Adhikari, S. Ghosh, and J. Lebowitz. Fluctuation and entropy in spectrally constrained random fields. Comm. Math. Phys. , 386:749--780, 2021

    2021

  2. [2]

    R. J. Adler and J. E. Taylor. R andom F ields and G eometry . Springer, 2007

    2007

  3. [3]

    Benedicks

    M. Benedicks. On fourier transforms of functions supported on sets of finite lebesgue measure. J. Math. Anal. Appl. , 106(1):180--183, 1985

    1985

  4. [4]

    Berg and G

    C. Berg and G. Frost. P otential T heory on L ocally C ompact A belian G roups . Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. Springer-Verlag, 1975

    1975

  5. [5]

    Baake and U

    M. Baake and U. Grimm. A periodic order, vol. 1, E ncyclopedia of M athematics and its A pplications , volume 149. Cambridge University Press, 2013

    2013

  6. [6]

    Bj\"orklund and T

    M. Bj\"orklund and T. Hartnick. H yperuniformity and non-hyperuniformity of quasicrystals. Math. Ann. , 389:365 -- 426, 2024

    2024

  7. [7]

    Borichev, A

    A. Borichev, A. Nishry, and M. Sodin. E ntire functions of exponential type represented by pseudo-random and random T aylor series. J. d'Analyse Math. , 133:361--396, 2017

    2017

  8. [8]

    Borichev, M

    A. Borichev, M. Sodin, and B. Weiss. 50 Years with Hardy Spaces , chapter Spectra of Stationary Processes on Z. Birkh \"a user, Cham, 2018

    2018

Show all 53 references
  1. [9]

    de Goes, K

    F. de Goes, K. Breeden, V. Ostromoukhov, and M. Desbrun. Blue noise through optimal transport. ACM Trans. Graph. , 31(6), 2012

    2012

  2. [10]

    J. L. Doob. S tochastic P rocesses . Wiley, 1953

    1953

  3. [11]

    D. J. Daley and D. Vere-Jones. A n I ntroduction to the T heory of P oint P rocesses, V olume I: Elementary Theory and Methods . Springer, Probability and its applications, 1988

    1988

  4. [12]

    Ghosh and J

    S. Ghosh and J. Lebowitz. N umber rigidity in superhomogeneous random point fields. J. Stat. Phys. , 166(3-4), 2017

    2017

  5. [13]

    Ghosh and J

    S. Ghosh and J. L. Lebowitz. Generalized stealthy hyperuniform processes: Maximal rigidity and the bounded holes conjecture. Comm. Math. Phys. , 363:97--110, 2018

    2018

  6. [14]

    Ghosh and Y

    S. Ghosh and Y. Peres. R igidity and tolerance in point processes: G aussian zeros and ginibre eigenvalues. Duke Math. J. , 166(10):1789--1858, 2017

    2017

  7. [15]

    Havin and B

    V. Havin and B. J\"oricke. Uncertainty principles and harmonic analysis . Springer, 1994

    1994

  8. [16]

    Helson and D

    H. Helson and D. Lowdenslager. Prediction theory and fourier series in several variables. Acta Math. , 99:165--202, 1958

    1958

  9. [17]

    P. Jamming. Nazarov's uncertainty principle in higher dimension. J. Approx. Th. , 149(1):30--41, 2007

    2007

  10. [18]

    M. A. Klatt, J. Lovric, D. Chen, S. Kapfer, F. Schaller, P. Schonoffer, B. Gardiner, A. Smith, G. Schroder-Turk, and S. Torquato. U niversal hidden order in amorphous cellular geometries. Nature communications , 10(811), 2019

    2019

  11. [19]

    Kulikov, F

    A. Kulikov, F. Nazarov, and M. Sodin. Fourier uniqueness and non-uniqueness pairs. J. Math. Phys. Anal. Geo. , 21(1), 2025

    2025

  12. [20]

    a ren zuf \

    A. N. Kolmogorov. Interpolation und extrapolation von station \"a ren zuf \"a lligen folgen. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Sero Mat. , 5:3--14, 1941

    1941

  13. [21]

    P. Koosis. The logarithmic integral . Cambridge University Press, 1988

    1988

  14. [22]

    M. G. Krein. On a certain extrapolation problem of A . N . K olmogorov (in russian). Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR , 46(8), 1945

    1945

  15. [23]

    Kurasov and P

    P. Kurasov and P. Sarnak. Stable polynomials and crystaline measure. J. Math. Phys. , 61(083501), 2020

    2020

  16. [24]

    Lagarias

    J. Lagarias. Directions in mathematical quasicrystals , chapter Mathematical quasicrystals and the problem of diffraction. AMS, Providence, RI, 2000, 2000

    2000

  17. [25]

    Lelong and L

    P. Lelong and L. Gruman. Entire Functions of Several Complex Variables . Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1986

    1986

  18. [26]

    Lev and A

    N. Lev and A. Olevskii. Fourier quasicrystals and discreteness of the diffraction spectrum. Adv. in Math. , 315:1--26, 2017

    2017

  19. [27]

    Lachi\` e ze-Rey

    R. Lachi\` e ze-Rey. R igidity of random stationary measures and applications to point processes. https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.18519, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Lachi\` e ze-Rey

    R. Lachi\` e ze-Rey. Hyperuniformity of random measures, transport and rigidity. preprint Hal, https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.18392, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  21. [29]

    A. L. Mackay. De nive quinquangula. Krystallografiya , 26(910-919), 1981

    1981

  22. [30]

    Y. Meyer. Algebraic Numbers and Harmonic Analysis . North Holland, Amsterdam, 1972

    1972

  23. [31]

    Y. Meyer. Q uasicrystals, diophantine approximation and algebraic numbers. B eyond quasicrystals. (Les Houches, 1994), 3--16, Springer, Berlin, 1995, 1995

    1994

  24. [32]

    Mityagin

    B. Mityagin. The zero set of a real analytic function. https://arxiv.org/abs/1512.07276, 2015

    2015 arXiv

  25. [33]

    P. K. Morse, J. Kim, P. J. Steinhardt, and S. Torquato. G enerating large disordered stealthy hyperuniform systems with ultrahigh accuracy to determine their physical properties. Phys. Rev. Res. , 5(3):33190, 2023

    2023

  26. [34]

    M \'e rigot, F

    Q. M \'e rigot, F. Santambrogio, and C. Sarrazin. Non-asymptotic convergence bounds for wasserstein approximation using point clouds. Adv. NeurIPS , 34, 2021

    2021

  27. [35]

    E. G. Oguz, J. E. Socolar, P. J. Steinhardt, and S. Torquato. H yperuniformity and anti-hyperuniformity in onedimensional substitution tilings. Acta Crystallographica Section A: Foundations and Advances , 75(1):3--13, 2019

    2019

  28. [36]

    R. Penrose. The role of aesthetics in pure and applied mathematical research. Bull. Inst. Math. Appl. , 10:266--271, 1974

    1974

  29. [37]

    Pilleboue, G

    A. Pilleboue, G. Singh, D. Coeurjolly, M. Kazhdan, and V. Ostromoukhov. Variance analysis for monte carlo integration. ACM Trans. Graph. , 34(4), 2015

    2015

  30. [38]

    W. Rudin. Real and Complex Analysis . McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1987

    1987

  31. [39]

    W. Rudin. Functional Analysis . McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1991

    1991

  32. [40]

    Radchenko and M

    D. Radchenko and M. Viazovska. Fourier interpolation on the real line. Pub. Math. IHES , 129:51--81, 2019

    2019

  33. [41]

    Shechtman, I

    D. Shechtman, I. Blech, D. Gratias, and J.W. Cahn. Metallic phase with long-range orientational order and no translational symmetry. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 53:1951--1953, 1984

    1951

  34. [42]

    A. Shih, M. Casiulis, and S. Martiniani. Fast generation of spectrally shaped disorder. Phys. Rev. E , 110(034122), 2024

    2024

  35. [43]

    H. S. Shapiro. F unctions with a spectral gap. Bull. AMS , 79(2):355--360, 1973

    1973

  36. [44]

    Stolzenberg

    G. Stolzenberg. Invariants and fundamental functions sigurdur helgason. Acta. Math. , 109:259--289, 1963

    1963

  37. [45]

    Szeg \"o

    G. Szeg \"o . B eitrage zur T heorie der T oeplitzschen F ormen. Math. Z. , 6:167--202, 1921

    1921

  38. [46]

    Torquato

    S. Torquato. D isordered hyperuniform heterogeneous materials. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter , 28(414012), 2016

    2016

  39. [47]

    Torquato

    S. Torquato. H yperuniform S tates of M atter. Physics Reports , 745:1--95, 2018

    2018

  40. [48]

    Torquato, G

    S. Torquato, G. Zhang, and F. H. Stillinger. E nsemble theory for stealthy hyperuniform disordered ground states. Phys. Rev. X , 5(021020):1--23, 2015

    2015

  41. [49]

    Verblunsky

    S. Verblunsky. On positive harmonic functions (second paper). Proc. London Math. Soc. , 40:290--320, 1936

    1936

  42. [50]

    N. Wiener. E xtrapolation, interpolation, and smoothing of stationary time series. W ith engineering applications. Cambridge, New York (1949 republication), 1942

    1949

  43. [51]

    DM Yan, JW. Guo, B. Wang, XP Zhang, and P. Wonka. A S urvey of B lue- N oise S ampling and I ts A pplications. J. Comput. Sci. Technol. , 30:439--452, 2015

    2015

  44. [52]

    Zhang, F

    G. Zhang, F. Stillinger, and S. Torquato. G round states of stealthy hyperuniform potentials: I . E ntropically favored configurations. Phys. Rev. E , 92 - 022119(1-14), 2015

    2015

  45. [53]

    Zhang, F

    G. Zhang, F. H. Stillinger, and S. Torquato. C an exotic disordered ''stealthy'' particle configurations tolerate arbitrarily large holes? Soft matter , 36(https://doi.org/10.1039/C7SM01028A), 2017

    2017 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.