Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Co-Tuning of Cloud Infrastructure and Distributed Data Processing Platforms

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.00269 v2 pith:TONNF7SQ submitted 2023-09-01 cs.DC

classification cs.DC
keywords clouddataplatformsprocessingconfigurationdistributedapproachco-tuning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Distributed Data Processing Platforms (e.g., Hadoop, Spark, and Flink) are widely used to store and process data in a cloud environment. These platforms distribute the storage and processing of data among the computing nodes of a cloud. The efficient use of these platforms requires users to (i) configure the cloud i.e., determine the number and type of computing nodes, and (ii) tune the configuration parameters (e.g., data replication factor) of the platform. However, both these tasks require in-depth knowledge of the cloud infrastructure and distributed data processing platforms. Therefore, in this paper, we first study the relationship between the configuration of the cloud and the configuration of distributed data processing platforms to determine how cloud configuration impacts platform configuration. After understanding the impacts, we propose a co-tuning approach for recommending optimal co-configuration of cloud and distributed data processing platforms. The proposed approach utilizes machine learning and optimization techniques to maximize the performance of the distributed data processing system deployed on the cloud. We evaluated our approach for Hadoop, Spark, and Flink in a cluster deployed on the OpenStack cloud. We used three benchmarking workloads (WordCount, Sort, and K-means) in our evaluation. Our results reveal that, in comparison to default settings, our co-tuning approach reduces execution time by 17.5% and $ cost by 14.9% solely via configuration tuning.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Balancing Fixed Number of Nodes Among Multiple Fixed Clusters

    cs.DC 2025-06 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    The paper describes a threshold-based node rebalancing architecture for container clusters that reuses a fixed pool of nodes and cancels moves that would violate utilization limits.

Pith tools