Comment on "Individual external dose monitoring of all citizens of Date City by passive dosimeter 5 to 51 months after the Fukushima NPP accident (series): II"

Jun Makino; Kyo Kageura; Masaki Oshikawa; Shin-ichi Kurokawa; Yoh Tanimoto; Yutaka Hamaoka

REVIEW

Comment on "Individual external dose monitoring of all citizens of Date City by passive dosimeter 5 to 51 months after the Fukushima NPP accident (series): II"

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1812.11453 v2 pith:TP5E6KKM submitted 2018-12-30 physics.med-ph

Shin-ichi Kurokawa , Yoh Tanimoto , Yutaka Hamaoka , Kyo Kageura , Jun Makino , Masaki Oshikawa This is my paper

classification physics.med-ph

keywords editorletterbeenacceptedaddedacceptaccidentadditional

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

0 comments

read the original abstract

This Letter to the Editor points out several inconsistencies found in the paper written by Makoto Miyazaki and Ryugo Hayano published as J. Radiol. Prot. 37(2017) 623-634. This Letter to the Editor had been in the stage of "is ready to accept" from November 17, 2018 to March 23, 2020 when it has been accepted for publication. Onto this Letter to the Editor, an additional Letter to the Editor on the same paper has been added. The added Letter to the Editor has been provisionally accepted on April 7, 2020.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools