Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 37 references

An indefinite Coulomb interaction from the Steklov spectrum of perforated manifolds

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Perforating a closed manifold with many small, mass-balanced holes makes its Steklov spectrum converge to the weighted Laplace–Beltrami spectrum at an optimal rate, with a next-order correction governed by an indefinite Coulomb-type interac

desk verdict Genuine new expansion for Steklov spectra on perforated manifolds; the upper bounds are sharp in scale, but the 'optimal' claim lacks a lower-bound proof. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.25211 v1 pith:TQ6NHNKK submitted 2026-07-28 math.AP math.DGmath.SP

Zhonggan Huang , Raghavendra Venkatraman This is my paper
classification math.APmath.DGmath.SP MSC 35P1558J5035B2735C2035J08
keywords StekloveigenvaluesLaplace-BeltramiperforatedmanifoldsquantitativehomogenizationCoulomb-typeinteractionenergyreducedGreenfunctionoptimalconvergenceratesmassbalancecondition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes sharp quantitative convergence of Steklov spectra to weighted Laplace–Beltrami spectra when a closed manifold is perforated by many tiny geodesic balls. The holes are sized so that each hole's boundary area equals the weighted volume of its surrounding Voronoi cell, making each hole neutral and suppressing monopole effects. Under this balance, eigenvalues differ by at most ω_d(ε)=ε^{d/(d−1)} (with a log factor in dimension 2), eigenfunctions by √ω_d, and a second-order expansion shows the leading correction is an indefinite Coulomb-type energy of the discrepancy between bulk and surface measures, mediated by the reduced Green function of Δ+λβ. The result turns a spectral-geometric homogenization statement into an interaction-energy statement, linking it to systems of point charges.

What carries the argument

The key object is a global cell function Φ^ε satisfying ΔΦ^ε = β away from the hole boundaries and a jump of normal derivative equal to 1 across ∂Ω^ε. This function quantifies the signed discrepancy measure μ^ε = βdV − dA and converts the eigenvalue difference σ^ε−λ into two controlled terms via integration by parts. Together with the reduced Green function G_λ — the kernel of the inverse of Δ+λβ on the orthogonal complement of the λ-eigenspace, with Coulomb-type singularity near the diagonal — it turns the spectral correction into a double-integral interaction energy. The per-cell neutrality condition μ^ε(V_p)=0 for every Voronoi cell suppresses monopole contributions and is what makes the

What would settle it

On a flat 2-torus with a maximally ε-separated set of mass-balanced holes, compute the first nonzero Steklov eigenvalue and compare σ^ε−λ with the Coulomb integral λ²∬ G_λ U U dμ^ε dμ^ε; if the difference does not track that integral at order ε²|log ε|, or if changing the hole configuration changes the sign of the leading correction in a way the indefinite kernel cannot reproduce, the expansion is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that, for a simple weighted Laplace–Beltrami eigenvalue λ with eigenfunction U, the corresponding Steklov eigenvalue σ^ε on the critically perforated manifold admits an expansion whose leading term, of order ω_d(ε), is governed by the indefinite Coulomb-type energy λ² ∬_{M×M} G_λ(x,y) U(x)U(y) dμ^ε(x)dμ^ε(y), where dμ^ε = βdV − dA on the hole boundaries and G_λ is the reduced Green function of Δ+λβ. A companion bound shows |σ^ε−λ| ≤ C ω_d(ε), with eigenfunctions converging at rate √ω_d in H¹, uniformly across eigenvalue clusters. In dimensions two and three, two correction scales are identified explicitly. The perforated manifold behaves, to leading order, like a system

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the per-cell neutrality condition (1.1)/(2.8): each hole's surface area must exactly equal the weighted volume of its Voronoi cell, so that μ^ε(V_p)=0; if this mass balance fails, a monopole contribution enters at a larger scale and both the convergence rate and the form of the leading correction change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Steklov eigenvalues on mass-balanced perforated manifolds converge to weighted Laplace–Beltrami eigenvalues at the optimal rate ω_d(ε), and harmonically extended eigenfunctions converge at rate √ω_d in H¹.
  • The next-order correction is an indefinite Coulomb-type interaction energy, so the perforated manifold is, to leading order, a discrete system of neutral charges coupled to a background charge through the reduced Green function.
  • In dimensions two and three, two distinct correction scales appear, allowing finer predictions than the qualitative convergence results that preceded this work.
  • The expansion is carried out for simple eigenvalues and adapted to spectral clusters with multiplicity, giving a uniform statement across degenerate eigenvalues.
  • The result bridges spectral geometry of perforated manifolds and the variational theory of Coulomb-type interaction energies, opening the door to quantitative variational analysis of shape-optimization limits.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the per-cell neutrality condition were only approximately satisfied, a monopole term would enter at a larger scale, so the sharp rate ω_d(ε) is itself a signature of exact mass balance rather than a generic homogenization phenomenon.
  • Because the Coulomb-type interaction is indefinite, any variational limit built from these energies will not be coercive; quantitative Gamma-convergence would require a signed or conditional formulation.
  • The global cell-function technique should adapt to the Euclidean 'dynamical eigenvalue' setting mentioned in the paper, yielding a companion next-order expansion there.
  • A numerical experiment with prescribed hole configurations on a flat torus could test the predicted dependence of the eigenvalue shift on the reduced Green function and on the signed measure μ^ε, including the sign changes of the leading correction.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies Steklov eigenvalues of a closed manifold perforated by many small geodesic balls, with each hole radius chosen so that its boundary area exactly balances the weighted volume of the corresponding Voronoi cell. The main results are (i) an upper bound of order ω_d(ε) for the difference between the k-th Steklov eigenvalue and the k-th weighted Laplace–Beltrami eigenvalue, together with an H^1 convergence rate of order √ω_d(ε) for harmonically extended eigenfunctions (Theorem 1.2), and (ii) a second-order expansion of the eigenvalue gap whose leading term is an indefinite Coulomb-type energy of the discrepancy measure μ^ε = β dV − dA|∂Ω^ε, mediated by the reduced Green function of Δ+λβ (Theorem 1.3). The proof introduces a global cell function Φ^ε, obtains sharp norm estimates for it (Theorem 3.1), and uses a corrector equation with a Green-function representation in Section 5.

Significance. If the results are correct, the second-order expansion is an original and valuable quantitative link between spectral homogenization on manifolds and Coulomb-gas/interaction-energy theory. The proof is largely self-contained, the estimates are explicit, and the derivation is parameter-free: the hole radii are determined by the mass-balance equation (2.8) and no eigenvalue data are fitted. The introduction of a global cell function, rather than per-cell functions, is a conceptually useful tool. However, the advertised optimality of the convergence rate is not actually proved, and the central theorem is unreadable as printed because of severe textual corruption.

major comments (2)
  1. [§1.1, Theorem 1.2; §3.4, Prop. 3.9] The manuscript repeatedly calls the bound (1.8) ‘optimal’ and the abstract/title advertise ‘optimal convergence rates’, but no matching lower bound for |σ^ε−λ| is proved. The only explicit sharpness statement, Proposition 3.9, concerns the L∞ norm of the auxiliary cell function Φ^ε, not the eigenvalue gap. Theorem 1.3 gives an expansion, but the leading Coulomb-type term is indefinite and depends on the configuration and on U; it may vanish for symmetric configurations or for eigenfunctions with zeros at the hole centers, and the remaining volume term (for d≥3) could in principle cancel it. Since no argument shows that the leading term is bounded below by c ω_d(ε), the claim ‘optimal’ is an overstatement. The authors should either prove a lower bound under a precise nondegeneracy hypothesis or rephrase the claim as a sharp upper bound.
  2. [§1.1, Theorem 1.3, Eqs. (1.12)–(1.14)] The displayed formulas of Theorem 1.3 are heavily corrupted by long strings of non-mathematical symbols (e.g. ‘⌟⟨⟨⟪rl⟫l⟩⟩⟪⌟⟪⟨⟨⟪rl⟫mo⟨...’). As printed, these are not well-formed assertions, making it impossible to verify the exact coefficients, the scales at which each term appears, and the claimed error orders. Since this theorem is the central quantitative result, the manuscript is not in publishable form. The authors must replace the corrupted displays with clean, parseable formulas and re-check the ordering of retained terms versus the error O(ω_d(ε)^{3/2}) in dimensions d≥4.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§1.1, after Theorem 1.2] The phrase ‘The rate ω_d(ε) is optimal’ is not supported by the preceding statements; see major comment.
  2. [§3.4, Proposition 3.9] The proof refers to Figure 1, which is not included in the provided text; the figure is important for the construction of the perturbed point set and should be supplied.
  3. [Header/running title] The author name appears as ‘Ragha Vendra Venkatraman’ in the running header; this should be corrected.
  4. [Various] There are numerous stray symbol sequences and OCR-like artifacts throughout the text (not only in Theorem 1.3), e.g. in Section 5 and the appendix. A full proofread of the LaTeX source is needed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the Steklov expansion is computed from exact identities and the spectral Green function, with no fitted parameter or self-citation chain carrying the argument.

full rationale

The claimed derivation is not circular. The starting point is the qualitative convergence theorem imported from the external works [21,23], not from the present authors' own prior results. The hole radii are defined by the mass-balance equation (2.8), H^{d-1}(∂B_{r_{ε,p}}(p)) = ∫_{V_p} β dV, which makes each hole neutral; this is a structural assumption, not a fit to any target eigenvalue. The eigenvalue expansion in Theorem 1.3 is obtained by substituting the corrector ansatz U^ε ≈ U + Z^ε into the exact integration-by-parts identity (1.15)/(4.2)-(4.3), with Z^ε defined as the solution of the corrector equation (5.4)/(1.19). Corollary 5.7 then rewrites the term ∫ Z^ε U dμ^ε using the standard spectral Green function G_λ from (1.11)/(5.34); this is an exact representation of the inverse of Δ+λβ on the orthogonal complement of U, not an assumed form of the answer. Thus the Coulomb-type interaction energy is derived, not imposed. No constant is fitted to any eigenvalue or eigenfunction data, and the claimed prediction is not statistically forced. The only self-citations in the paper, [2] and [36], appear in the literature review as contextual references and play no load-bearing role in the proof. Separately, the word "optimal" in Theorem 1.2 is not supported by a lower bound on |σ^ε−λ| in units of ω_d(ε); Proposition 3.9 establishes sharpness only for the auxiliary cell function Φ^ε, not for the eigenvalue gap. That is a completeness or correctness concern, not a circularity step, and it does not raise the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 2 invented entities

No fitted free parameters appear: the radii are determined by the mass-balance equation (2.8) and all constants are explicit controls in terms of M,g,d,S,λ. The derivation uses standard spectral/elliptic tools plus the geometric construction of perforations. The only new objects are proof devices (Φ_ε, Z_ε), not empirically motivated entities.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Standard spectral theory of Steklov and weighted Laplace–Beltrami operators on compact Riemannian manifolds, including Weyl asymptotics and Green function estimates for (M,g).
    Invoked throughout, especially Section 2.2 and Appendix A for the spectral resolution of G_λ and elliptic regularity.
  • domain assumption For small ε, Voronoi cells V_p are geodesically convex with C^{-1}ε^d ≤ |V_p| ≤ C ε^d and B_{ε/4}(p) ⊂ V_p ⊂ B_ε(p).
    Stated in Section 2.1 items (5)-(6) following [23]; used for Poincaré inequalities on cells and in the L∞ bound for the cell function.
  • domain assumption For each p, the radius r_{ε,p} exists uniquely as the solution of A(∂B_r(p)) = ∫_{V_p} β dV, with C^{-1}ε^{d/(d−1)} ≤ r ≤ C ε^{d/(d−1)}.
    This mass-balance construction (1.1)/(2.8) defines the perforated domain and is the mechanism suppressing monopoles.
  • domain assumption Theorem 1.3 is stated for a simple eigenvalue λ; the multiplicity-m case is delegated to Lemma 5.1 in Section 5.
    Simplicity keeps the Green function normalization and the expansion notation clean; the paper claims the general case follows by the same argument.
  • standard math The reduced Green function G_λ exists as a symmetric distribution with smooth kernel off the diagonal and near-diagonal singularity |log d_g| (d=2) or d_g^{2−d} (d≥3).
    Constructed in Appendix A via the spectral series ∑_{j≠k} u_j(x)u_j(y)/(λ−λ_j) and elliptic regularity; needed for the Coulomb-energy representation.
invented entities (2)
  • Global cell function Φ_ε
    purpose: Solves ΔΦ=β in M∖∂Ω with normal-derivative jump 1 on ∂Ω; encodes the discrepancy measure μ^ε and yields the optimal bound on the eigenvalue term J1.
    New auxiliary object introduced in (1.18)/(3.1); its sharpness is analyzed internally (Theorem 3.1, Proposition 3.9) but it has no external falsifiable handle.
  • Corrector Z_ε
    purpose: Solution of (Δ+λβ)Z_ε = λU dμ^ε − δ_ε βU dV orthogonal to the eigenspace; extracts the next-order eigenvalue correction.
    Standard corrector in the asymptotic expansion (1.19)/(5.4); its role is proven internally, not empirically verified.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of An indefinite Coulomb interaction from the Steklov spectrum of perforated manifolds." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TQ6NHNKK

@misc{pith2026260725211,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: An indefinite Coulomb interaction from the Steklov spectrum of perforated manifolds},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TQ6NHNKK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.25211}
}
read the original abstract

We establish optimal convergence rates for Steklov eigenvalues and harmonically extended eigenfunctions toward their weighted Laplace--Beltrami counterparts on a closed manifold perforated by many small geodesic balls. The holes have radii that scale critically with respect to their spacing in the sense that the boundary area of each hole balances with the weighted volume of its Voronoi cell. We then derive a higher-order expansion of the Steklov eigenvalues; in dimensions two and three, we identify two correction scales. The expansion is governed by an indefinite Coulomb-type energy of the discrepancy between the boundary and bulk measures, mediated by the reduced Green function of the limiting operator. The proof relies on sharp estimates for certain auxiliary functions that we introduce in order to quantify the discrepancy measure between the surface measure on the holes and their background density. Our paper serves to bridge an emerging literature in spectral geometry with one on systems of points interacting via Coulomb-type energies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.25211 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Left: A picture of points 1 6 Z 2 ∩(−1/2, 1/2) 2 (the black ones) and its scaling (the red ones) at the origin with factor 1 − ηε = 0.95. Note that there are 6 ∗ 6 = 36 points, with the black ones being maximally 1 6 -separated and the red ones being maximally 0.95 6 - separated. The origin (0, 0) is colored by green and the point (−0.5,−0.5) is colored blue. Right: the square (−1/2, 1/2) 2 is separated into the Vor… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 4 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    1, 27–68

    Grégoire Allaire, Eric Bonnetier, Gilles Francfort, and François Jouve,Shape optimization by the homogenization method, Numerische Mathematik76(1997), no. 1, 27–68

    1997

  2. [2]

    Scott Armstrong and Raghavendra Venkatraman,Optimal convergence rates for the spectrum of the graph laplacian on poisson point clouds, Foundations of Computational Mathematics (2025), 1–26

    2025

  3. [3]

    Monge-Ampère Equations(M

    Thierry Aubin,Nonlinear Analysis on Manifolds. Monge-Ampère Equations(M. Artin, S. S. Chern, J. L. Doob, A. Grothendieck, E. Heinz, F. Hirzebruch, L. Hörmander, S. Mac Lane, W. Magnus, C. C. Moore, J. K. Moser, M. Nagata, W.Schmidt,D.S.Scott,J.Tits,B.L.VanDerWaerden,M.Berger,B.Eckmann,andS.R.S.Varadhan,eds.),Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, ...

    1982

  4. [4]

    ,Some Nonlinear Problems in Riemannian Geometry, Springer Monographs in Mathematics, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1998

    1998

  5. [5]

    Laurent Bétermin and Etienne Sandier,Renormalized energy and asymptotic expansion of optimal logarithmic energy on the sphere, arXiv preprint arXiv:1404.4485 (2014)

    arXiv 2014

  6. [6]

    6, 4122–4164

    DenisI.Borisov,Operator estimates for non-periodically perforated domains with Dirichlet and nonlinear Robin conditions: strange term, Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences47(2024), no. 6, 4122–4164

    2024

  7. [7]

    M. Carme Calderer, Antonio DeSimone, Dmitry Golovaty, and Alexander Panchenko,An effective model for nematic liquid crystal composites with ferromagnetic inclusions, SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics74(2014), no. 2, 237–262

    2014

  8. [8]

    arXiv:2511.20071

    Giacomo Canevari, Kirill Cherednichenko, and Arghir Zarnescu,A not-so-strange term coming from somewhere, 2025. arXiv:2511.20071

    arXiv 2025

Show all 37 references
  1. [9]

    2, 309–342

    Giacomo Canevari and Arghir Zarnescu,Design of effective bulk potentials for nematic liquid crystals via colloidal ho- mogenisation, Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences30(2020), no. 2, 309–342

    2020

  2. [10]

    Google-Books-ID: 0v1VfTWuKGgC

    Isaac Chavel,Eigenvalues in Riemannian Geometry, Academic Press, 1984 (en). Google-Books-ID: 0v1VfTWuKGgC

    1984

  3. [11]

    3–4, 163–184

    Kirill Cherednichenko, Patrick Dondl, and Frank Rösler,Norm-resolvent convergence in perforated domains, Asymptotic Analysis110(2018), no. 3–4, 163–184

    2018

  4. [12]

    ii, Communications in Mathematical Physics406 (2025), no

    Kirill Cherednichenko, Alexander V Kiselev, Igor Velčić, and Josip Žubrinić,Effective behaviour of critical-contrast pdes: micro-resonances, frequency conversion, and time dispersive properties. ii, Communications in Mathematical Physics406 (2025), no. 4, 72

    2025

  5. [13]

    Nazarov, and Andrey L

    Valeria Chiadò Piat, Sergey S. Nazarov, and Andrey L. Piatnitski,Steklov problems in perforated domains with a coefficient of indefinite sign, Networks and Heterogeneous Media7(2012), no. 1, 151–178

    2012

  6. [14]

    arXiv:2509.18630

    Adrian Chun-Pong Chu and Daniel Stern,Minimal surface doublings and electrostatics for Schrödinger operators, 2025. arXiv:2509.18630

    2025

  7. [15]

    Un terme étrange venu d’ailleurs,

    Doina Cioranescu and François Murat,A strange term coming from nowhere, Topics in the mathematical modelling of composite materials, 1997, pp. 45–93. Translation of “Un terme étrange venu d’ailleurs,” Collège de France Seminar (1982)

    1997

  8. [16]

    1, 1–161

    Bruno Colbois, Alexandre Girouard, Carolyn Gordon, and David Sher,Some recent developments on the Steklov eigenvalue problem, Revista Matemática Complutense37(2024), no. 1, 1–161

    2024

  9. [17]

    5, 4011–4030

    Ailana Fraser and Richard Schoen,The first Steklov eigenvalue, conformal geometry, and minimal surfaces, Advances in Mathematics226(2011), no. 5, 4011–4030

    2011

  10. [18]

    3, 823–890

    ,Sharp eigenvalue bounds and minimal surfaces in the ball, Inventiones mathematicae203(2016), no. 3, 823–890

    2016

  11. [19]

    2, 245–268

    Nicola Garofalo and Fang-Hua Lin,Monotonicity properties of variational integrals, A p weights and unique continuation, Indiana University Mathematics Journal35(1986), no. 2, 245–268

    1986

  12. [20]

    Trudinger,Elliptic Partial Differential Equations of Second Order, 2nd ed., Classics in Mathe- matics, Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 2001

    David Gilbarg and Neil S. Trudinger,Elliptic Partial Differential Equations of Second Order, 2nd ed., Classics in Mathe- matics, Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 2001

    2001

  13. [21]

    2, 981–1023 (en)

    Alexandre Girouard, Antoine Henrot, and Jean Lagacé,From Steklov to Neumann via homogenisation, Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis239(February 2021), no. 2, 981–1023 (en). 42 ZHONGGAN HUANG AND RAGHA VENDRA VENKATRAMAN

    2021

  14. [22]

    3, 513–561 (en)

    Alexandre Girouard, Mikhail Karpukhin, and Jean Lagacé,Continuity of eigenvalues and shape optimisation for Laplace and Steklov problems, Geometric and Functional Analysis31(June 2021), no. 3, 513–561 (en)

    2021

  15. [23]

    3, 1011–1056 (en)

    Alexandre Girouard and Jean Lagacé,Large Steklov eigenvalues via homogenisation on manifolds, Inventiones mathemat- icae226(December 2021), no. 3, 1011–1056 (en)

    2021

  16. [24]

    2, 321–359

    Alexandre Girouard and Iosif Polterovich,Spectral geometry of the Steklov problem, Journal of Spectral Theory7(2017), no. 2, 321–359

    2017

  17. [25]

    Mathieu Lewin,Coulomb and riesz gases: The known and the unknown, Journal of Mathematical Physics63(2022), no. 6

    2022

  18. [26]

    Peter Li,Geometric Analysis, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012

    2012

  19. [27]

    11, 364 (en)

    Chia-Chun Lo,Homogenisation for the Robin Eigenvalue Problem on Manifolds and Flexibility of Optimal Schrödinger Potentials, The Journal of Geometric Analysis35(September 2025), no. 11, 364 (en)

    2025

  20. [28]

    Marchenko and Evgueni Ya

    Vladimir A. Marchenko and Evgueni Ya. Khruslov,Homogenization of partial differential equations, Progress in Mathe- matical Physics, vol. 46, Birkhäuser, Boston, 2006

    2006

  21. [29]

    Charles W Misner, Kip S Thorne, and John Archibald Wheeler,Gravitation, W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, 1973

    1973

  22. [30]

    G. C. Papanicolaou and S. R. S. Varadhan,Diffusion in regions with many small holes, Collected papers. volume ii: Pde, sde, diffusions, random media. edited by rajendra bhatia, abhay bhatt and k. r. parthasarathy, 2012, pp. 477–493 (English)

    2012

  23. [31]

    X. Pennec,Hessian of the Riemannian Squared Distance,https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ Hessian-of-the-Riemannian-Squared-Distance-Pennec/0eed5a28d23c3b10f351eb2b20f59db9bfc85cda(2017)

    2017

  24. [32]

    Jeffrey Rauch and Michael Taylor,Potential and scattering theory on wildly perturbed domains, Journal of Functional Analysis18(1975), 27–59

    1975

  25. [33]

    3, 635–743

    Etienne Sandier and Sylvia Serfaty,From the ginzburg-landau model to vortex lattice problems, Communications in Math- ematical Physics313(2012), no. 3, 635–743

    2012

  26. [34]

    Sylvia Serfaty,Systems of points with coulomb interactions, European Mathematical Society Magazine110(2018), 16–21

    2018

  27. [35]

    ,Lectures on coulomb and riesz gases, arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.21194 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Nicolás García Trillos, Chenghui Li, and Raghavendra Venkatraman,Minimax rates for the estimation of eigenpairs of weighted laplace-beltrami operators on manifolds, arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.00171 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Muthusamy Vanninathan,Homogenization of eigenvalue problems in perforated domains, Proceedings of the indian acad- emy of sciences-mathematical sciences, 1981, pp. 239–271. Email address:zhonggan@math.utah.edu Email address:raghav@math.utah.edu

    1981

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.