New structurally unstable families of planar vector fields

Nataliya Goncharuk; Nikita Solodovnikov; Yury G. Kudryashov

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 28 references

New structurally unstable families of planar vector fields

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Ears and glasses vector fields are structurally unstable under weak equivalence, with a ratio of saddle characteristic numbers as the invariant.

desk verdict New non-polycycle examples with a real numerical invariant and a clean proof architecture; the main risk is the imported sparkling-connection estimate, which a referee should verify. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.02693 v1 pith:TQZHD5M2 submitted 2019-08-07 math.DS

Nataliya Goncharuk , Yury G. Kudryashov , Nikita Solodovnikov This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.DS MSC 37C1537C2937G15

keywords structuralinstabilityweaktopologicalequivalenceSep-tracingnumericalinvariantssaddleloopbifurcationseparatrixgraphsearsandglassesplanarvectorfields

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves that generic three-parameter unfoldings of vector fields on the two-sphere that pass through one of two degenerate configurations—the separatrix graphs called “ears” and “glasses”—are structurally unstable even under the very flexible notion of weak topological equivalence with Sep-tracing. The obstruction is a numerical invariant: for a degenerate field the ratio $\varphi(v)=-\ln\rho(v)/\ln\lambda(v)$, where $\lambda$ and $\rho$ are the characteristic numbers of its two saddles, must be preserved by any such equivalence. Because $\varphi$ takes every positive value and has nonzero derivative on the codimension-three manifold $M=E\sqcup G$, the equivalence classes form a continuum and no transverse three-parameter unfolding can be stable. This adds two new configurations to the known phenomenon of locally generic structurally unstable three-parameter families, previously seen only for the “tears of the heart” polycycle.

What carries the argument

The engine is the asymptotic law for sparkling separatrix connections: when a saddle loop is broken with splitting parameter $\varepsilon>0$, the winding separatrix forms a connection with the stable separatrix after $n$ turns exactly for parameters satisfying $\ln(-\ln\varepsilon_n(\beta))=n\ln\lambda(0,\beta)+O(1)$, with the error uniform in the transverse parameter $\beta$. This turns the discrete winding count into the logarithmic coordinate $\ln(-\ln\varepsilon)/\ln\lambda$, and a homeomorphism of parameter spaces preserves the ordered sequence of these connections, forcing the difference of these coordinates for two equivalent families to stay bounded. The second estimate, $\ln\delta=\lambda(\alpha)\rho(\alpha)\ln\varepsilon+O(1)$ on the synchronizing subfamily, is where the product $\lambda\rho$ enters and fixes the exact form of the invariant as $-\ln\rho/\ln\lambda$.

What would settle it

Compute the splitting parameters $\varepsilon$ and $\delta$ along the synchronizing subfamily of an explicit ears or glasses unfolding and compare $\ln\delta$ with $\lambda(\alpha)\rho(\alpha)\ln\varepsilon$: a deviation larger than $O(1)$ as $\varepsilon,\delta\to0$ would break Eq. (10) and with it the invariant. The direct decisive test would be to exhibit two unfoldings that are weakly topologically equivalent with Sep-tracing but whose central fields have different values of $-\ln\rho/\ln\lambda$; the theorem asserts such a pair cannot exist.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 4: on the union $M=E\sqcup G$ of vector fields with “ears” or “glasses” separatrix graphs, the function $\varphi(v)=-\ln\rho(v)/\ln\lambda(v)$ is a robustly invariant function for weak topological equivalence with Sep-tracing. The manifold has codimension three and is topologically distinguished, so every transverse three-parameter unfolding of such a field is structurally unstable, and the last two conclusions of the theorem—$\varphi(M)=\mathbb{R}_+$ and $d\varphi\neq0$—show the invariant is genuinely non-degenerate. The proof compares two equivalent unfoldings, applies the growth law for sparkling separatrix connections to each of the two broken loops to obtain logarithmic splitting asymptotics, and then restricts to a synchronizing subfamily in which the two splitting parameters are linked by a correspondence map; the limit of the ratio of log-log splitting parameters gives $\lambda\rho$, which forces $\varphi(v_0)=\tilde\varphi(\tilde v_0)$.

Load-bearing premise

The proof rests on the imported growth law $\ln(-\ln\varepsilon_n(\beta))=n\ln\lambda(0,\beta)+O(1)$ for sparkling separatrix connections, with the $O(1)$ term uniform in the parameters; if that estimate, or the analogous synchronizing estimate $\ln\delta=\lambda\rho\ln\varepsilon+O(1)$, fails, the forced equality of the invariants no longer follows.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Every transverse three-parameter unfolding of an ears or glasses vector field is structurally unstable with respect to weak topological equivalence with Sep-tracing.
The function $\varphi(v)=-\ln\rho(v)/\ln\lambda(v)$ becomes a numerical invariant on an open set of non-local three-parameter families, so the instability reaches beyond germs at the degenerate field.
Since $\varphi$ takes all positive values and $d\varphi\neq0$, the classification of these unfoldings has a continuum of distinct classes.
The ears and glasses configurations join the “tears of the heart” polycycle as known codimension-three degeneracies whose generic unfoldings escape structural stability under this equivalence.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same two-loop-plus-bridge architecture could plausibly be stacked: each additional loop that feeds a bridge would force another ratio of log-characteristic numbers, so configurations of this shape may give families with many independent invariants at finite codimension.
The invariance argument never invokes Hölder regularity of the parameter homeomorphism, unlike the classical saddle-loop modulus; this suggests ears and glasses are unstable under a strictly weaker equivalence than the saddle-loop example, a consequence the authors do not draw explicitly.
The two asymptotic estimates (3) and (10) could be checked numerically on a concrete unfolding; since they are imported rather than proved here, a direct measurement of their $O(1)$ terms would test the mechanism without waiting for a full proof.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Punchline: the central claim is a new result, not a repackaging. Ears and glasses are the first non-polycycle separatrix graphs shown to have generically structurally unstable 3-parameter unfoldings, with -lnρ/lnλ as a numerical invariant. The synchronizing-subfamily trick is a new device, and Theorem 3 is a useful packaging of the sparkling-connection estimate from tears of the heart.

What it does well: the logic from Theorem 3 to the equality φ(v0)=φ̃(ṽ0) is transparent. Equations (7) and (8) come from applying the packaged theorem to the two loops, their ratio is the ratio of φ's, and Lemma 1 forces the synchronizing ratios to 1. I could follow this part line by line. The paper is also honest about what it imports: it explicitly says Theorem 3 reinterprets [16].

Soft spots: the main one is real. The engine is (3), imported verbatim from [16, Lemma 4] and [18, Lemma 6], with overlapping authorship and no statement of hypotheses or proof of the uniform O(1) in β. The limit formulas and the synchronizing argument all reduce to that uniformity. This does not make the paper unserious, but it means the new invariant inherits its validity from an external lemma. A referee should check that lemma or ask for a sketch in the paper. Secondary: M being embedded codim-3 and topologically distinguished is asserted in one or two sentences. The codim-3 part is standard; the topological distinction is plausible given the structurally stable complement, but since it underpins Theorem 2, it deserves a paragraph. The ears case of Lemma 1 is compressed relative to glasses; the missing step is routine but should be written out.

The stress-test note overstates the dependence on the exact product λρ in (10): the synchronizing lemma only needs a power-law with logarithmically bounded exponent. So that particular worry is not the load-bearing one; the load-bearing is (3).

Who this is for: specialists in planar global bifurcation theory. Someone outside that area will likely not need it. It deserves a serious referee: the claim is important within the subfield, the proof architecture is checkable, and the gaps are fillable. I'd send it out.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies global bifurcations in generic 3-parameter families of vector fields on the two-sphere. It introduces two new classes of degenerate vector fields, called 'ears' and 'glasses', and proves (Theorems 1 and 4) that the function φ(v) = -ln ρ(v)/ln λ(v) is a robust invariant for transverse 3-parameter unfoldings with respect to weak topological equivalence with Sep-tracing. Consequently, all such unfoldings are structurally unstable, and an open set of non-local 3-parameter families carries a numerical invariant (Theorem 2). The proof reduces the invariance to asymptotic comparisons of separatrix splitting parameters around the 'ears' and 'glasses' graphs, using the theory of 'sparkling separatrix connections' imported from prior work.

Significance. If correct, the paper provides two new examples of locally generic structurally unstable 3-parameter families, complementing the 'tears of the heart' example and simplifying the construction because the separatrix graph is not a polycycle. The invariant is explicitly computable and the overall reduction from a dynamical equivalence to an algebraic identity is transparent. The paper also contains a clean reusable statement (Theorem 3) for the saddle-loop bifurcation. However, the central quantitative estimate (3) is not proved in the manuscript and is only cited, with no explicit statement of hypotheses or uniformity, and the proof of the synchronizing lemma is compressed. These points need to be addressed.

major comments (2)

[Sec. 3.2, Eq. (3)] The paper's central asymptotic estimate ln(-ln ε_n(β)) = n ln λ(0,β) + O(1) is imported from [16, Lemma 4] and [18, Lemma 6] as a black box. The text asserts that the O(1) term is uniformly bounded in a neighborhood {0<ε<C, ‖β‖<C}, but no proof is given and the hypotheses of the cited lemmas are not stated. This uniformity is essential because it is used in the limit formulas (7)-(8) and in the synchronizing argument of Sec. 4.3; if the O(1) constant grew as β→0, those limits would fail. The authors should either prove (3) with the required uniformity or state and prove a precise lemma, giving a full reference to the exact statement in [16] or [18] and explaining how the uniformity follows.
[Sec. 4.3, Lemma 1] The proof that the synchronizing subfamily E satisfies ln(-ln ε)/ln(-ln δ) → 1 is too compressed. The derivation of Eq. (10), ln δ = λ(α)ρ(α) ln ε + O(1), relies on an assertion about correspondence maps of a chain of saddles that is not proved in detail; the text says 'for a chain of maps one should multiply the exponents' and cites references that do not clearly cover the composition of a loop and a bridge map. In the 'ears' case the argument is reduced to two displayed equalities followed by 'Similarly'. Since Lemma 1 is the step that forces φ(v0) = φ̃(ṽ0), a fuller proof is needed.

minor comments (5)

[Sec. 1, p.2] The word 'arbitraﬁly' is a typo for 'arbitrarily' in the description of metrically generic 3-parameter families.
[Sec. 4.3, proof of Lemma 1] The citation 'see e.g. [16, Lemma 5, 10, Lemma 1]' appears to be miscopied, since reference [10] concerns the Krylov–Bogolyubov procedure and does not contain a saddle correspondence map. Please correct the citation or explain which lemma supplies the saddle map estimate.
[Sec. 4.1.2] The claim that M is an embedded Banach submanifold of codimension 3 is justified in one sentence by taking ψ = (ε,σ,δ). The full rank of this map is not demonstrated; please add a brief argument showing that the three splitting parameters are independent.
[Sec. 4.3, after Eq. (10)] The step 'Taking logarithms of both sides, we get (9)' is not immediate. Since (10) is an asymptotic relation for the logarithms themselves, please add one line showing that ln(-ln δ) = ln(-ln ε) + ln(λρ) + o(1), which gives the desired ratio.
[Sec. 2.2.1, Definition 5] The definition of 'topologically distinguished' could be phrased more clearly: it should state explicitly that there exists a neighbourhood U of M such that no vector field in U\M is orbitally topologically equivalent to a vector field in M.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the invariant proof is a genuine derivation from an independent published estimate, not a restatement of its inputs.

full rationale

The paper's invariant phi(v) = -ln rho(v)/ln lambda(v) is defined on the ears/glasses manifolds and proven invariant via the asymptotic relations (7), (8), and the synchronizing lemma (9)-(10). The central quantitative engine, Eq. (3), is imported from [16, Lemma 4] and [18, Lemma 6], prior published results by overlapping authors; the paper states 'The following theorem reinterprets results of [16]' and 'Due to [16, Lemma 4]'. This is a load-bearing self-citation, but it is not circular: [16] is an independently published, peer-reviewed proof (Inventiones 213:461-506) whose target portrait ('tears of the heart') differs from the ears/glasses configurations, and the estimate concerns the same local 'sparkling separatrix connection' mechanism rather than the target invariant. The cited estimate is not derived from the present paper's definition of phi, nor is any parameter fitted to force phi's invariance. Eq. (10) is a standard saddle correspondence estimate, and the synchronizing subfamily argument does not presuppose the equality it proves. The robustness and topological-distinguishedness parts are argued from structural stability and the Sep-tracing property, not from the conclusion. Accordingly no step reduces by construction to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper is a pure-mathematics proof with no free parameters fitted to data and no newly postulated entities; λ and ρ are intrinsic characteristic numbers of the saddles, not hand-chosen constants (φ = -ln ρ / ln λ is a function on M, not a fit). The central claim rests on two classes of quantitative inputs from prior work: the correspondence-map asymptotics of hyperbolic saddles (standard in the field, cited to [16, Lemma 5] and [10, Lemma 1]) and the sparkling-connection growth law (3), which is cited from the authors' own papers [16, 18]. The structural assumptions (λ > 1, ρ < 1, winding separatrices interior to the loops) are explicit hypotheses of Definition 7, not hidden axioms. The manifold/submersion and topological-distinguishedness statements are asserted in Sec. 4.1.2 and are the softest inputs. No new entities (fields, conserved quantities, dimensions) are introduced: 'ears' and 'glasses' are names for configurations of standard dynamical objects.

assumptions (4)

standard math Correspondence maps of a hyperbolic saddle with characteristic number μ are asymptotically x ↦ C x^μ, and exponents multiply along a chain of maps ([16, Lemma 5], [10, Lemma 1]).
Used in Lemma 1 to obtain ln δ = λ(α)ρ(α) ln ε + O(1) (Eq. 10) for the synchronizing subfamily, which fixes the product λρ inside the invariant φ.
domain assumption Sparkling separatrix connection asymptotic: the curves ε = ε_n(β) satisfy ln(-ln ε_n(β)) = n ln λ(0,β) + O(1), uniformly in β ([16, Lemma 4], [18, Lemma 6]).
The quantitative core of Theorem 3 (Eq. 3) and of the growth-rate limits (7)-(8); cited from the authors' own prior papers and not re-derived here.
domain assumption M = E ⊔ G is an embedded codimension-3 Banach submanifold of Vect with defining submersion ψ = (ε, σ, δ), the three separatrix splitting parameters; and M is topologically distinguished in a neighborhood.
Asserted in Sec. 4.1.2 with a one-sentence justification ('It is easy to see...' and 'The last two requirements of Definition 7 guarantee...'). Load-bearing for the transfer to non-local families (Theorem 2).
standard math Classical structural stability of generic planar vector fields (Andronov-Pontryagin, Peixoto) and Sotomayor's quasi-generic classification.
Background framing: defines which fields are generic and which degeneracies define the codimension-1 boundary on which the constructions sit.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of New structurally unstable families of planar vector fields." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TQZHD5M2

@misc{pith2026190802693,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: New structurally unstable families of planar vector fields},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TQZHD5M2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.02693}
}

abstract

We study global bifurcations in generic 3-parameter families of vector fields on $S^2$. In the recent article [arXiv:1506.06797], Ilyashenko, Kudryashov, and Schurov show that 3-parameter unfoldings of vector fields with the polycycle "tears of the heart" are structurally unstable. We consider 3-parameter unfoldings of vector fields with separatrix graphs "ears" and "glasses", and prove that these families are structurally unstable as well. We also study in more details the classical bifurcation of a saddle loop, and use it as a building block in our main example.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.02693 by the authors.

**Figure 4.** Vector fields vα, α ∈ E, for “glasses” and “ears” Dividing (7) by (8), we obtain ln(− ln ˜ε) ln(− ln ˜δ) ÷ ln(− ln ε) ln(− ln δ) → ln ρ(0)−1 ln λ(0) ÷ ln ˜ρ(0)−1 ln λ˜(0) = ϕL,R(v0) ϕL, ˜ R˜(˜v0) as ε → 0+, δ → 0+, σ → 0, η → 0, (˜ε, σ, ˜ ˜δ, η˜) = h(ε, σ, δ, η). In order to complete the proof of Theorem 5 it suffices to find a synchronizing subfamily E ⊂ { α ∈ (R k , 0) | ε > 0, δ > 0 } such that lim α→0 α∈E ln(− l… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

28 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages

[16]

Global bifurcations in the two-sphere: a new perspective

Yu. S. Ilyashenko, Yu. G. Kudryashov, and I. Schurov. “Global bifurcations in the two-sphere: a new perspective”. In: Inventiones mathematicae 213.2 (Aug. 2018), pp. 461–506. issn: 0020-9910. doi: 10.1007/s00222-018-0793-1 . arXiv: 1506:06797. url: http://rdcu.be/IqCp

work page doi:10.1007/s00222-018-0793-1 2018
[18]

Bifurcations of the polycycle "tears of the heart": multiple numerical invariants

Yu. G. Kudryashov and N. Goncharuk. Bifurcations of the polycycle “tears of the heart”. multiple numerical invariants . to appear in Moscow Math. J. arXiv: 1808.07459 [math.DS]

work page Pith review arXiv
[1]

A. A. Andronov, E. A. Leontovich, I. I. Gordon, and A. G. Ma˘ ıer. Qualitative theory of second-order dynamic systems . New York-Toronto, Ont. and Jerusalem- London: Halsted Press [A division of John Wiley & Sons] and Israel Program for Scientiﬁc Translations, 1973. xxiii+524. Trans. of Kachestvennaya teoriya di- namicheskih sistem vtorogo poryadka . Russ...

work page 1973
[2]

A. A. Andronov, E. A. Leontovich, I. I. Gordon, and A. G. Ma˘ ıer. Theory of bifurcations of dynamic systems on a plane . Russian. New York-Toronto, Ont. and Jerusalem-London: Halsted Press [A division of John Wiley & Sons] and Israel Program for Scientiﬁc Translations, 1973. xiv+482. Trans. of Teoriya bifurkaciy dinamicheskih sistem na ploskosti . Russia...

work page 1973
[3]

Syst` emes grossiers

A. Andronov and L. Pontrjagin. “Syst` emes grossiers”. In:Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR 14 (1937), pp. 247–251

work page 1937
[4]

V. I. Arnold, V. S. Afrajmovich, Yu. S. Ilyashenko, and L. P. Shilnikov. Dy- namical Systems V. Bifurcation Theory and Catastrophe Theory . Ed. by A. V. I. Vol. 5. Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences. Berlin: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 1994, pp. IX, 274. doi: 10.1007/978- 3- 642- 57884- 7. url: http: //www.springer.com/gp/book/9783540181736

arXiv 1994
[5]

Dynamical Systems with Stable Structures

H. F. DeBaggis. “Dynamical Systems with Stable Structures”. In: Contributions to the Theory of Nonlinear Oscillations . Ed. by S. Lefschetz. Vol. II. Annals of Mathematics Studies 29. Princeton University Press, 1952, pp. 37–60. url: http: //www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1bgz9z7.6

work page 1952
[6]

Bifurcations of the ‘heart’ polycycle in generic 2-parameter fam- ilies

A. V. Dukov. “Bifurcations of the ‘heart’ polycycle in generic 2-parameter fam- ilies”. Trans. by I. Marshall. In: Transactions of the Moscow Mathematical So- ciety (2018), pp. 209–229. doi: 10 . 1090 / mosc / 284. Trans. of “Bifurkacii poli- cikla ‘serdce’ v tipichnyh dvuparametricheskih semeistvah”. In:Trudy Moskovskogo Matematicheskogo Obshchestva 79.2...

work page 2018

Show all 28 references

[7]

Functional invariants in generic semilocal families of vector ﬁelds on two-dimensional sphere

A. V. Dukov. “Functional invariants in generic semilocal families of vector ﬁelds on two-dimensional sphere”. In preparation
[8]

Numerical invariants in generic semilocal families of vector ﬁelds on two-dimensional sphere

A. V. Dukov and Yu. S. Ilyashenko. “Numerical invariants in generic semilocal families of vector ﬁelds on two-dimensional sphere”. In preparation
[9]

On the saddle loop bifurcation

F. Dumortier and R. Roussarie. “On the saddle loop bifurcation”. In: Bifurcations of Planar Vector Fields (Luminy, France, Sept. 18–22, 1989). Ed. by J.-P. Fran¸ coise and R. Roussarie. Vol. 1455. Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 1990, pp. 44–73. isb...

1989 doi
[10]

Convergence of the Krylov–Bogolyubov Procedure in Bowan’s Example

T. I. Golenishcheva–Kutuzova and V. A. Kleptsyn. “Convergence of the Krylov–Bogolyubov Procedure in Bowan’s Example”. In: Math. Notes 82.5 (2007), pp. 608–618. doi: 10.1134/S0001434607110041

2007 doi
[11]

N. B. Goncharuk and Yu. S. Ilyashenko. Large bifurcation supports . Apr. 2018. arXiv: 1804.04596. 16 New structurally unstable families References

2018 arXiv
[12]

Equivalence relations in bifurcations of planar vector ﬁelds

N. Goncharuk and Yu. S. Ilyashenko. “Equivalence relations in bifurcations of planar vector ﬁelds”. In preparation
[13]

Goncharuk, Yu

N. Goncharuk, Yu. S. Ilyashenko, and N. Solodovnikov. Global bifurcations in generic one-parameter families with a parabolic cycle on S2. To appear in Moscow Math. Jorunal. arXiv: 1707.09779 [math.DS]

arXiv
[14]

Bifurcations of planar vector ﬁelds: new examples of families with functional invariants

N. Goncharuk and Yu. G. Kudryashov. “Bifurcations of planar vector ﬁelds: new examples of families with functional invariants”. In preparation
[15]

Towards the General Theory of Global Planar Bifurcations

Yu. S. Ilyashenko. “Towards the General Theory of Global Planar Bifurcations”. In: Mathematical Sciences with Multidisciplinary Applications. In Honor of Pro- fessor Christiane Rousseau. And In Recognition of the Mathematics for Planet Earth Initiative . Ed. by B. Toni. Vol. 1...

2016 doi
[17]

Global Bifurcations in Generic One- Parameter Families with a Separatrix Loop on S2

Yu. S. Ilyashenko and N. Solodovnikov. “Global Bifurcations in Generic One- Parameter Families with a Separatrix Loop on S2”. In: Moscow Mathematical Journal 18.1 (January-March 2018), pp. 93–115. issn: 1609-4514. url: http : //www.mathjournals.org/mmj/2018-018-001/2018-018-00...

2018
[19]

Kuznetsov

Yu. Kuznetsov. Elements of Applied Bifurcation Theory. 3rd ed. Vol. 112. Applied Mathematical Sciences. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2004. XXII, 632. isbn: 978-1- 4757-3978-7. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-3978-7

2004 doi
[20]

Families of vector ﬁelds with ﬁnite modulus of stability

I. P. Malta and J. Palis. “Families of vector ﬁelds with ﬁnite modulus of stability”. In: Dynamical Systems and Turbulence. Proceedings of the Symposium (University of Warwick, 1979–1980). Ed. by D. Rand and L.-S. Young. Vol. 898. Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Berlin, Heidelbe...

1979 doi
[21]

On Structural Stability

M. M. Peixoto. “On Structural Stability”. In: Annals of Mathematics . Second Series 69.1 (Jan. 1959), pp. 199–222. doi: 10.2307/1970100. url: http://www. jstor.org/stable/1970100

1959
[23]

Structural stability on two-dimensional manifolds. A further re- mark

M. M. Peixoto. “Structural stability on two-dimensional manifolds. A further re- mark”. In: Topology 2.1 (Jan. 1, 1963), pp. 179–180. issn: 0040-9383. doi: 10 . 1016/0040-9383(63)90032-6. url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/0040938363900326 (visited on 06/20/2017)

1963
[24]

Non-local two-parametric bifurcations of planar vector ﬁelds

V. Sh. Roitenberg. “Non-local two-parametric bifurcations of planar vector ﬁelds”. PhD thesis. Yaroslavl State Technical University, 2000

2000
[25]

On bifurcation of vector ﬁelds with a separatrix winding onto a polycycle formed by separatrices of two saddles of diﬀerent types

V. Sh. Roitenberg. “On bifurcation of vector ﬁelds with a separatrix winding onto a polycycle formed by separatrices of two saddles of diﬀerent types”. In: Almanac of contemporary science and education 7 (2012), pp. 116–121. issn: 1993-5552

2012
[26]

Weak and continuous equivalences for families on line diﬀeomor- phisms

R. Roussarie. “Weak and continuous equivalences for families on line diﬀeomor- phisms”. English. In: Dynamical systems and bifurcation theory, Proc. Meet. (Rio de Janeiro/Braz. 1985). Pitman Res. Notes Math. Ser. 160. 1987, pp. 377–385

1985
[27]

On bifurcation of separatrix contours with two saddles

M. V. Shashkov. “On bifurcation of separatrix contours with two saddles”. In: International journal of Bifurcation and Chaos 2.4 (1992), pp. 911–915. doi: 10. 1142 / S0218127492000525. url: https : / / www . worldscientific . com / toc / ijbc/02/04

1992
[28]

Generic one-parameter families of vector ﬁelds on two-dimensional manifolds

J. Sotomayor. “Generic one-parameter families of vector ﬁelds on two-dimensional manifolds”. In: Publications Math´ ematiques de l’Institut des Hautes´Etudes Scien- tiﬁques 43.1 (1974), pp. 5–46.issn: 0073-8301, 1618-1913. doi: 10.1007/BF02684365

1974 doi
[29]

Global Bifurcations in Generic One-parameter Families on S2

V. Starichkova. “Global Bifurcations in Generic One-parameter Families on S2”. In: Regular and Chaotic Dynamics 23.6 (2018), pp. 767–784. issn: 1560-3547. doi: 10.1134/S1560354718060102. 18

2018 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [16]

Global bifurcations in the two-sphere: a new perspective

Yu. S. Ilyashenko, Yu. G. Kudryashov, and I. Schurov. “Global bifurcations in the two-sphere: a new perspective”. In: Inventiones mathematicae 213.2 (Aug. 2018), pp. 461–506. issn: 0020-9910. doi: 10.1007/s00222-018-0793-1 . arXiv: 1506:06797. url: http://rdcu.be/IqCp

work page doi:10.1007/s00222-018-0793-1 2018

[2] [18]

Bifurcations of the polycycle "tears of the heart": multiple numerical invariants

Yu. G. Kudryashov and N. Goncharuk. Bifurcations of the polycycle “tears of the heart”. multiple numerical invariants . to appear in Moscow Math. J. arXiv: 1808.07459 [math.DS]

work page Pith review arXiv

[3] [1]

A. A. Andronov, E. A. Leontovich, I. I. Gordon, and A. G. Ma˘ ıer. Qualitative theory of second-order dynamic systems . New York-Toronto, Ont. and Jerusalem- London: Halsted Press [A division of John Wiley & Sons] and Israel Program for Scientiﬁc Translations, 1973. xxiii+524. Trans. of Kachestvennaya teoriya di- namicheskih sistem vtorogo poryadka . Russ...

work page 1973

[4] [2]

A. A. Andronov, E. A. Leontovich, I. I. Gordon, and A. G. Ma˘ ıer. Theory of bifurcations of dynamic systems on a plane . Russian. New York-Toronto, Ont. and Jerusalem-London: Halsted Press [A division of John Wiley & Sons] and Israel Program for Scientiﬁc Translations, 1973. xiv+482. Trans. of Teoriya bifurkaciy dinamicheskih sistem na ploskosti . Russia...

work page 1973

[5] [3]

Syst` emes grossiers

A. Andronov and L. Pontrjagin. “Syst` emes grossiers”. In:Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR 14 (1937), pp. 247–251

work page 1937

[6] [4]

V. I. Arnold, V. S. Afrajmovich, Yu. S. Ilyashenko, and L. P. Shilnikov. Dy- namical Systems V. Bifurcation Theory and Catastrophe Theory . Ed. by A. V. I. Vol. 5. Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences. Berlin: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 1994, pp. IX, 274. doi: 10.1007/978- 3- 642- 57884- 7. url: http: //www.springer.com/gp/book/9783540181736

arXiv 1994

[7] [5]

Dynamical Systems with Stable Structures

H. F. DeBaggis. “Dynamical Systems with Stable Structures”. In: Contributions to the Theory of Nonlinear Oscillations . Ed. by S. Lefschetz. Vol. II. Annals of Mathematics Studies 29. Princeton University Press, 1952, pp. 37–60. url: http: //www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1bgz9z7.6

work page 1952

[8] [6]

Bifurcations of the ‘heart’ polycycle in generic 2-parameter fam- ilies

A. V. Dukov. “Bifurcations of the ‘heart’ polycycle in generic 2-parameter fam- ilies”. Trans. by I. Marshall. In: Transactions of the Moscow Mathematical So- ciety (2018), pp. 209–229. doi: 10 . 1090 / mosc / 284. Trans. of “Bifurkacii poli- cikla ‘serdce’ v tipichnyh dvuparametricheskih semeistvah”. In:Trudy Moskovskogo Matematicheskogo Obshchestva 79.2...

work page 2018