Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 minor 1 cited by

Almost abelian complex nilmanifolds

T0 review · 0 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A complex structure on a nilpotent almost abelian real Lie algebra, when it exists, is unique up to isomorphism, and the explicit normal form this gives determines the cohomology and deformation theory of the associated complex…

desk verdict A strong, well-executed paper proving uniqueness of complex structures on nilpotent almost abelian Lie algebras; the main caveat is its reliance on an overlapping external classification that is not reproved. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.03306 v1 pith:TR3XWJHT submitted 2025-02-05 math.DG math.AG

Adrián Andrada , Romina M. Arroyo , María L. Barberis , Sönke Rollenske , Konstantin Wehler This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.DGmath.AG MSC 32Q5722E2517B3032G05
keywords almostabelianLiealgebracomplexnilmanifolduniquenessofstructureDolbeaultcohomologyFrölicherspectralsequencedeformationsstructuresJordannormalformtorusbundleseries
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves that a complex structure on a nilpotent almost abelian real Lie algebra—one containing an abelian ideal of codimension one—is unique up to isomorphism whenever it exists, and that the unique structure is given by an explicit normal form built from the Jordan normal form of the adjoint action. Because the normal form is explicit, the associated compact quotients, the almost abelian complex nilmanifolds, become fully accessible: they are iterated principal holomorphic torus bundles, their Dolbeault cohomology is computed by left-invariant forms, and their Frölicher spectral sequence degenerates at the first page. The same control extends to families: every small deformation is unobstructed, and every deformation in the large is again a complex nilmanifold. This gives a class of complex nilmanifolds with unbounded nilpotency index whose cohomology and deformations are completely determined by the underlying Lie algebra.

What carries the argument

The machinery is a normal form for $(\mathfrak{g}, J)$. The classification theorem [ABD+24] encodes the Jordan partition of the nilpotent adjoint matrix $A$ in a partition $n = \sum_i q_i i$ with a distinguished index $j$, the size of the overlapping block; the possible Jordan partitions of $A$ are listed in (3.4). With this data, $A$ is the matrix (3.8), consisting of two identical Jordan blocks from the partition of the subspace plus an off-diagonal vector, and $J_0$ is the standard block matrix (3.9). A stable principal torus bundle series—a rational, $J$-invariant filtration whose successive quotients lie in the centre—then supplies the iterated holomorphic torus bundle structure, and the Hochschild–Serre spectral sequence together with $\mathfrak{sl}_2(\mathbb{C})$-representation counts supplies the cohomological formulas.

What would settle it

Enumerate nilpotent almost abelian Lie algebras of dimension 8, corresponding to partitions of 7, and check integrability of a declared almost complex structure: finding a complex structure whose adjoint Jordan partition is not of the form (3.4), or finding a single Lie algebra carrying two non-isomorphic complex structures, would refute the classification and the uniqueness theorem built on it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is Proposition 3.10: for a nilpotent almost abelian Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g}$ of dimension $2n+2$ with integrable complex structure $J$, there is a basis $e_0,\dots,e_{2n+1}$ in which the codimension-one abelian ideal is $\langle e_1,\dots,e_{2n+1}\rangle$, $\operatorname{ad}(e_0)$ restricts to the fixed Jordan block matrix $A$ of (3.8), and $J$ is represented by the fixed block matrix $J_0$ of (3.9). The size $j$ of the overlapping block in the classification of [ABD+24] determines the matrix, so any two complex structures on the same Lie algebra are conjugate by a Lie algebra automorphism. From this normal form the authors derive Theorem 1.1: a stable torus bundle series, left-invariant computation of Dolbeault cohomology, and $E_1$-degeneration of the Frölicher spectral sequence. They then derive Theorem 1.2: the Kuranishi space of deformations is smooth and universal, and every deformation in the large is a complex nilmanifold.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the external classification of which nilpotent almost abelian Lie algebras admit complex structures is complete and correct; the paper builds its normal form on that classification and does not reprove it.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every almost abelian complex nilmanifold is an iterated principal holomorphic torus bundle; the bundle structure is stable under all integrable complex structures and all rational structures, hence independent of the lattice.
  • Dolbeault cohomology is computed by left-invariant forms, $H^{p,q}_{\bar\partial}(X) \cong H^q(\mathfrak{g}^{0,1}, \Lambda^p \mathfrak{g}^{*1,0})$, and the Frölicher spectral sequence degenerates at $E_1$, so Betti numbers are sums of Hodge numbers.
  • All Betti and Hodge numbers can be obtained by an explicit algorithm: decompose the relevant representations of the one-dimensional complex Lie algebra into $\mathfrak{sl}_2(\mathbb{C})$-irreducible summands and apply the formulas of Proposition 4.11.
  • Small deformations are unobstructed with a smooth universal Kuranishi family, and every fibre is again a complex nilmanifold; the same holds for deformations in the large over a connected base.
  • The complex structure is always nilpotent and, unless the Lie algebra is $\mathfrak{h}_3 \oplus \mathbb{R}^{2n-1}$, never abelian; the class therefore gives examples of arbitrarily large nilpotency index with full cohomological control.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The uniqueness result implies that the space of left-invariant complex structures on a fixed almost abelian nilmanifold is either empty or a single point up to isomorphism; continuous families of complex structures must therefore come from varying the Lie algebra or from non-left-invariant structures, a distinction the paper does not address.
  • The explicit $\mathfrak{sl}_2(\mathbb{C})$-counting algorithm for Hodge and Betti numbers is likely reusable for other cohomology theories, such as Bott–Chern or Aeppli cohomology, where $E_1$-degeneration alone does not determine the groups; testing left-invariance there is a natural next step.
  • Because the torus bundle series is stable, the same fibration structure could be used to study Hermitian metric functionals on all almost abelian complex nilmanifolds; the paper only notes that SKT metrics force the Lie algebra to be $\mathfrak{h}_3 \oplus$ abelian in the nilpotent case.
  • The large-deformation statement is proved via a good fibre class argument; whether it extends from nilmanifolds to the larger class of almost abelian solvmanifolds is not addressed and would be a separate question.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proves that a complex structure on a nilpotent almost abelian real Lie algebra, when it exists, is unique up to Lie algebra isomorphism, and it uses this uniqueness to obtain strong geometric and cohomological consequences for the corresponding complex nilmanifolds. Working from the existence classification quoted as Theorem 3.2 from [ABD+24], the authors construct an explicit normal form (g_A, J_0) for any such complex structure (Proposition 3.10). From this normal form they prove Theorem 1.1: every almost abelian complex nilmanifold has a stable principal torus bundle series, its Dolbeault cohomology is computed by left-invariant forms, and its Frölicher spectral sequence degenerates at E1. They also prove Theorem 1.2: small deformations are again complex nilmanifolds, deformations are unobstructed, the Kuranishi family is universal, and every deformation in the large is again a complex nilmanifold. The tools are Jordan normal form, sl2-representation theory, Clebsch-Gordan rules, Hochschild-Serre spectral sequences, and standard results on nilmanifold deformations. Explicit formulas for Betti and Hodge numbers in terms of counts of Jordan blocks are derived and illustrated in several examples.

Significance. If the external classification [ABD+24] is correct, this is a significant and novel contribution: it appears to be the first class of complex nilmanifolds with unbounded nilpotency index for which the Dolbeault cohomology and the deformation theory are fully controlled. The paper is careful in its use of standard tools, gives an explicit normal form that is used for all later computations, and provides a concrete algebraic recipe for computing Hodge and Betti numbers. The main weakness is an epistemic one: Proposition 3.10 and all subsequent statements depend crucially on Theorem 3.2, quoted from a preprint by a partially overlapping set of authors, which is not reproved here. This is a normal citation dependence rather than an internal inconsistency, but it should be stated explicitly so that readers are aware that the main results are conditional on the correctness of that classification.

minor comments (6)
  1. [§3.B, Proposition 3.10] The sentence comparing the Jordan partitions of A, B and B' and concluding 'B = B′ up to reordering of the Jordan blocks except the first one' is too terse for a step on which the uniqueness claim rests; the conclusion follows from the parity structure of (3.4), but the authors should spell out that the map (q,j) ↦ m is injective, for example by noting that for j > 1 the largest part size with odd multiplicity is j, while for j = 1 all multiplicities except that of size 1 are even.
  2. [§4.C, Example 4.13] The displayed Hodge numbers h^{2,0}(X) = \binom{n+1}{2} and h^{0,2}(X) = \binom{n}{2} + 1 appear to be typographical errors: they should be δ(V^2 W_{n+1}) = \lfloor (n+1)/2 \rfloor and δ(V^2 W_n) + 1 = \lfloor n/2 \rfloor + 1, respectively, in order to be consistent with the Betti number computation b_2(X) = 2n + 2 and with the formula in Proposition 4.11.
  3. [§4.B, proof of Theorem 1.2] In the proof of Theorem 1.2, the expression b_1(X) = 2δ(b^*_{1,0}) + 1 introduces the undefined symbol b^*_{1,0}; this should read δ(g^*_{1,0}), since δ(a^*) = 2δ(g^*_{1,0}) in the ε = 1 case by Lemma 4.8.
  4. [§3.B, Corollary 3.12] In the ε = 1 case of Corollary 3.12, the formula 'd(e_2 + ie_{2+n}) = 1/(2i) α ∧ α' must be a typo, since α ∧ α = 0; the intended expression is α ∧ \bar{α}.
  5. [§3.A and Remark 3.5] The introduction states that for a nilpotent almost abelian Lie algebra of dimension 2n + 2 the step of nilpotency is at most n; this follows from the structure of the Jordan partition (3.4) but the argument is not given in the introduction, so the authors should either add a reference or move the justification forward.
  6. [§3.B, Theorem 3.2] Since all main results depend on the classification quoted as Theorem 3.2 from [ABD+24], and that classification is not proved in this paper, the authors should add an explicit sentence in Section 3.B acknowledging this dependence and pointing to the precise statement in [ABD+24].

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the uniqueness theorem is proved by an explicit basis construction, and the reliance on [ABD+24] is an external classification dependency rather than an input–output identification.

full rationale

The derivation is not circular. Proposition 3.10 proves uniqueness by taking an arbitrary integrable complex structure J on a nilpotent almost abelian Lie algebra and constructing, from the J-invariant decomposition b = a ∩ Ja and the Jordan decomposition of φ|b, a real basis in which φ and J are exactly the explicit matrices A and J0. The conclusion that a complex structure, if it exists, is unique up to isomorphism is the output of this construction, not an input or a fitted parameter. The only external input is Theorem 3.2, the classification from [ABD+24], which supplies the Jordan partition pattern (3.4) and the index j; this is a theorem with stated assumptions, independent of the target uniqueness claim, and it is cited transparently rather than smuggled in as an ansatz. Although [ABD+24] shares two authors with the present paper and is a preprint, that is a dependency or correctness risk, not a circular reduction: no equation, basis choice, or structural ansatz in this paper is defined in terms of the result it is used to prove. The cohomological and deformation consequences likewise follow from the normal form via standard external theorems (Console–Fino, Nomizu, Rollenske, Wavrik) and standard spectral-sequence arguments, with no prediction reducing by construction to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's results are deductive; there are no fitted parameters, no empirical inputs, and no new postulated entities. The load-bearing inputs are external theorems, primarily the existence classification [ABD+24], the integrability lemma [LRV15], the cohomology theorems [CF01, RTW20], and the deformation criteria [Rol09a, Rol09b, ACRT18]. These are cited but not reproved.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Existence classification: a nilpotent almost abelian Lie algebra g = g_A of dimension 2n+2 admits a complex structure iff its Jordan partition is of the form (3.4) (Theorem 3.2, quoted from [ABD+24]).
    The present paper uses this classification to fix the partition data and the overlapping block index j; it is not reproved here.
  • domain assumption Integrability implies that phi = ad_{e0}|a preserves b = a ∩ Ja and that phi|b commutes with J|b (cited from [LRV15, Section 6]).
    This lemma is used in the proof of Proposition 3.10 to construct the normal form; if it were false, the uniqueness proof would break.
  • domain assumption Console-Fino theorem and the main theorem of [RTW20]: for these nilmanifolds, Dolbeault cohomology is computed by left-invariant forms.
    This is the main input for Theorem 1.1(ii). The paper cites [CF01, Section 5] and the alternative nilpotent-complex-structure theorem [RTW20].
  • domain assumption Deformation theorems: small deformations of nilmanifolds with nilpotent complex structure are nilmanifolds [Rol09b, Theorem 2.6]; unobstructedness follows from [ACRT18, Theorem 3.3] for compact complex manifolds with trivial canonical bundle and E1-degeneration; large deformations are governed by…
    These external results supply the deformation statements in Theorem 1.2. The paper verifies their hypotheses but does not reprove the theorems.
  • standard math Standard Lie theory: Malcev's theorem on lattices, Nomizu's theorem, Hochschild-Serre spectral sequence, Clebsch-Gordan rules for sl2 representations, and Wavrik's universality criterion.
    Invoked throughout Sections 2 and 4 as background tools; these are textbook-level facts.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Almost abelian complex nilmanifolds." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TR3XWJHT

@misc{pith2026250203306,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Almost abelian complex nilmanifolds},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TR3XWJHT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.03306}
}
read the original abstract

We show that a complex structure on a nilpotent almost abelian real Lie algebra is unique if it exists. As a consequence, we get full control over the cohomology and deformations of almost abelian complex nilmanifolds.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Almost abelian pseudo-K\"ahler Lie algebras

    math.DG 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Every almost abelian pseudo-Kähler Lie algebra is classified into seven families in all dimensions, and nilpotent almost abelian Lie algebras with a complex structure automatically admit pseudo-Kähler metrics.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Hypercomplex almost abelian solvmanifolds

    Adri\' a n Andrada and Mar\' a Laura Barberis. Hypercomplex almost abelian solvmanifolds. J. Geom. Anal. , 33(7):Paper No. 213, 31, 2023

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    Applications of the quaternionic J ordan form to hypercomplex geometry

    Adri\' a n Andrada and Mar\' a Laura Barberis. Applications of the quaternionic J ordan form to hypercomplex geometry. J. Algebra , 664(part B):73--122, 2025

    work page 2025

  3. [3]

    Classification of almost abelian Lie groups admitting left-invariant complex or symplectic structures

    Romina M. Arroyo, María L. Barberis, Verónica S. Diaz, Yamile Godoy, and Isabel Hernández. Classification of nilpotent almost abelian lie groups admitting left-invariant complex or symplectic structures, https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.06819, 2024

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  4. [4]

    -complex symplectic and C alabi- Y au manifolds: A lbanese map, deformations and period maps

    Ben Anthes, Andrea Cattaneo, S\"onke Rollenske, and Adriano Tomassini. -complex symplectic and C alabi- Y au manifolds: A lbanese map, deformations and period maps. Ann. Global Anal. Geom. , 54(3):377--398, 2018

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Arroyo and Ramiro A

    Romina M. Arroyo and Ramiro A. Lafuente. The long-time behavior of the homogeneous pluriclosed flow. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. , 119(3):266--289, 2019

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    Some formulas in invariant theory

    Gert Almkvist. Some formulas in invariant theory. J. Algebra , 77(2):338--359, 1982

    work page 1982

  7. [7]

    Arroyo and Marina Nicolini

    Romina M. Arroyo and Marina Nicolini. SKT structures on nilmanifolds. Math. Z. , 302(2):1307--1320, 2022

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Harmonic almost complex structures on almost abelian lie groups and solvmanifolds

    Adrián Andrada and Alejandro Tolcachier. Harmonic almost complex structures on almost abelian lie groups and solvmanifolds. Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. , 203:1037--1060, 2024

    work page 2024

Show all 38 references
  1. [9]

    Canonical bundles of complex nilmanifolds, with applications to hypercomplex geometry

    María Laura Barberis, Isabel Dotti, and Misha Verbitsky. Canonical bundles of complex nilmanifolds, with applications to hypercomplex geometry. Math. Res. Lett. , 16:331--347, 2009

    2009

  2. [10]

    Locally conformal SKT almost abelian L ie algebras

    Louis-Brahim Beaufort and Anna Fino. Locally conformal SKT almost abelian L ie algebras. Linear Algebra Appl. , 684:1--22, 2024

    2024

  3. [11]

    Complex symplectic L ie algebras with large A belian subalgebras

    Giovanni Bazzoni, Marco Freibert, Adela Latorre, and Nicoletta Tardini. Complex symplectic L ie algebras with large A belian subalgebras. Linear Algebra Appl. , 677:254--305, 2023

    2023

  4. [12]

    Dolbeault cohomology of compact nilmanifolds

    Sergio Console and Anna Fino. Dolbeault cohomology of compact nilmanifolds. Transform. Groups , 6(2):111--124, 2001

    2001

  5. [13]

    Console, A

    S. Console, A. Fino, and Yat Sun Poon. Stability of abelian complex structures. Internat. J. Math. , 17(4):401--416, 2006

    2006

  6. [14]

    Corwin and Frederick P

    Lawrence J. Corwin and Frederick P. Greenleaf. Representations of nilpotent L ie groups and their applications. P art I , volume 18 of Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990. Basic theory and examples

    1990

  7. [15]

    Invariant complex structures on 6-nilmanifolds: classification, F r \"o licher spectral sequence and special hermitian metrics

    Manuel Ceballos, Antonio Otal, Luis Ugarte, and Raquel Villacampa. Invariant complex structures on 6-nilmanifolds: classification, F r \"o licher spectral sequence and special hermitian metrics. J. Geom. Anal. , 26:252--286, 2016

    2016

  8. [16]

    Gray, Luis Ugarte, and Luis Rego

    Marisa Fernández, A. Gray, Luis Ugarte, and Luis Rego. Nilpotent complex structures. Revista de la Real Academia de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales. Serie A: Matemáticas (RACSAM) , 95(1):45--56, 01 2001

    2001

  9. [17]

    Representation theory , volume 129 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics

    William Fulton and Joe Harris. Representation theory , volume 129 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics . Springer-Verlag, New York, 1991. A first course, Readings in Mathematics

    1991

  10. [18]

    Generalized K \" a hler almost abelian L ie groups

    Anna Fino and Fabio Paradiso. Generalized K \" a hler almost abelian L ie groups. Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. (4) , 200(4):1781--1812, 2021

    2021

  11. [19]

    Cocalibrated structures on lie algebras with a codimension one abelian ideal

    Marco Freibert. Cocalibrated structures on lie algebras with a codimension one abelian ideal. Ann. Glob. Anal. Geom. , 42:537--563, 2012

    2012

  12. [20]

    Dolbeault cohomology of complex nilmanifolds foliated in toroidal groups

    Anna Fino, S\"onke Rollenske, and Jean Ruppenthal. Dolbeault cohomology of complex nilmanifolds foliated in toroidal groups. Q. J. Math. , 70(4):1265--1279, 2019

    2019

  13. [21]

    Discrete cocompact subgroups of the generic filiform nilpotent lie groups

    Hatem Hamrouni. Discrete cocompact subgroups of the generic filiform nilpotent lie groups. J. Lie Theory , 18(28):1--16, 2008

    2008

  14. [22]

    Minimal models of nilmanifolds

    Keizo Hasegawa. Minimal models of nilmanifolds. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society , 106(1):65--71, 1989

    1989

  15. [23]

    Humphreys

    James E. Humphreys. Introduction to L ie algebras and representation theory , volume 9 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics . Springer-Verlag, New York-Berlin, 1978. Second printing, revised

    1978

  16. [24]

    Anthony W. Knapp. Lie groups beyond an introduction , volume 140 of Progress in Mathematics . Birkh\"auser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, second edition, 2002

    2002

  17. [25]

    On the C hern- R icci flow and its solitons for L ie groups

    Jorge Lauret and Edwin Rodríguez-Valencia. On the C hern- R icci flow and its solitons for L ie groups. Math. Nachr. , 288(13):1512--1526, 2015

    2015

  18. [26]

    On the symplectic curvature flow for locally homogeneous manifolds

    Jorge Lauret and Cynthia Will. On the symplectic curvature flow for locally homogeneous manifolds. J. Symplectic Geom. , 15(1):1--49, 2017

    2017

  19. [27]

    A. I. Malcev. On a class of homogeneous spaces. Amer. Math. Soc. Translation , 1951(39):33, 1951

    1951

  20. [28]

    Andr\' e s J. Moreno. Harmonic G_2 -structures on almost A belian L ie groups. Differential Geom. Appl. , 91:Paper No. 102060, 18, 2023

    2023

  21. [29]

    On the cohomology of compact homogeneous spaces of nilpotent L ie groups

    Katsumi Nomizu. On the cohomology of compact homogeneous spaces of nilpotent L ie groups. Ann. of Math. (2) , 59:531--538, 1954

    1954

  22. [30]

    Geometry of nilmanifolds with left-invariant complex structure and deformations in the large

    S\"onke Rollenske. Geometry of nilmanifolds with left-invariant complex structure and deformations in the large. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) , 99(2):425--460, 2009

    2009

  23. [31]

    Lie-algebra D olbeault-cohomology and small deformations of nilmanifolds

    S\"onke Rollenske. Lie-algebra D olbeault-cohomology and small deformations of nilmanifolds. J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) , 79(2):346--362, 2009

    2009

  24. [32]

    Dolbeault cohomology of nilmanifolds with left-invariant complex structure

    S\"onke Rollenske. Dolbeault cohomology of nilmanifolds with left-invariant complex structure. In Complex and differential geometry , volume 8 of Springer Proc. Math. , pages 369--392. Springer, Heidelberg, 2011

    2011

  25. [33]

    Vertical-horizontal decomposition of L aplacians and cohomologies of manifolds with trivial tangent bundles

    S\"onke Rollenske, Adriano Tomassini, and Xu Wang. Vertical-horizontal decomposition of L aplacians and cohomologies of manifolds with trivial tangent bundles. Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. (4) , 199(3):833--862, 2020

    2020

  26. [34]

    On compact complex parallelisable solvmanifolds

    Yusuke Sakane. On compact complex parallelisable solvmanifolds. Osaka Math. J. , 13(1):187--212, 1976

    1976

  27. [35]

    S. M. Salamon. Complex structures on nilpotent L ie algebras. J. Pure Appl. Algebra , 157(2-3):311--333, 2001

    2001

  28. [36]

    Obstructions to the existence of a space of moduli

    John J Wavrik. Obstructions to the existence of a space of moduli. Global analysis (Papers in honor of K. Kodaira) , pages 403--414, 1969

    1969

  29. [37]

    Charles A. Weibel. An introduction to homological algebra , volume 38 of Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994

    1994

  30. [38]

    M. L. Barberis, I. Dotti, M. Verbitsky, Canonical bundles of complex nilmanifolds, with applications to hypercomplex geometry, Math. Res. Lett. 16 (2009), 331--347. @article BDV, author = María Laura Barberis and Isabel Dotti and Misha Verbitsky , year = 2009 , pages = 331--34...

    2009

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.