Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 35 references

Plasma lens for the focusing of positron bunches

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A plasma lens operating in the linear wakefield regime can focus positron bunches and shrink their radius by a factor of 2.6.

desk verdict Plausible numerical idea for a positron plasma lens, but the missing simulation details make the headline 2.6x focusing figure unverifiable as presented. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.03225 v1 pith:TUVFQLMU submitted 2025-09-03 physics.plasm-ph physics.acc-ph

D. S. Bondar , C. A. Lindstr{o}m , V. I. Maslov , I. N. Onishchenko This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.plasm-phphysics.acc-ph PACS 29.17.+w41.75.Lx
keywords plasmalenspositronbunchfocusingwakefieldlinearregimeprecursorenergyspreadreductiontrainparticle-in-cellsimulation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to show that a plasma lens driven by a precursor positron bunch can focus a trailing positron bunch in the linear wakefield regime. The recipe is to place the bunch in the phase where its head is decelerated and its tail is accelerated; the simulations then show high-quality transverse focusing, with the bunch radius reduced by a factor of 2.6. The same configuration is claimed to focus a sequence of positron bunches with identical, uniform focusing force. This matters because positrons are much harder to focus in plasma than electrons, so a linear-regime lens that preserves beam quality would remove a known bottleneck for plasma-based positron accelerators.

What carries the argument

The mechanism is the phase of the plasma wakefield set by a precursor bunch: the trailing positron bunch is placed where the longitudinal electric field decelerates its head, accelerates its tail, and is near zero in the middle, which counteracts the correlated energy spread. Transverse focusing is provided by the azimuthal magnetic field and the radial Lorentz force of the wake, which stay approximately linear with radius over most of the bunch in the linear regime. The simulation tracks the average bunch radius and the charge-weighted average longitudinal field to demonstrate the focusing and infer the energy-spread compensation.

What would settle it

Track the energy histogram of the second positron bunch in the same 2d3v simulation and compare the RMS energy spread at $t=0$ and $t=18\,\omega_{pe}^{-1}$; if the spread does not decrease while the head-tail field pattern is present, the energy-spread claim is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is that a positron bunch following a precursor in a linear wakefield experiences a near-uniform transverse focusing force while sitting in a longitudinal field whose head decelerates and tail accelerates. For both a purely Gaussian bunch and an elongated flat-top bunch with Gaussian edges, the numerical simulations show the bunch radius decreases by a factor of 2.6. The charge-weighted average longitudinal field over the bunch is close to zero, so the head-tail field pattern does not add net acceleration and is expected to counteract energy spread. The paper further claims that a train of positron bunches spaced half a plasma wavelength after the precursor all see the same focusing force, so uniform focusing extends from a single bunch to a sequence.

Load-bearing premise

The paper assumes that putting the head of the bunch in a decelerating field and the tail in an accelerating field reduces the energy spread, but it never tracks the actual energy distribution to verify this.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single positron bunch following a precursor can be focused by a factor of 2.6 in the linear wakefield regime, with a uniform central plateau of small radius.
  • Two different initial bunch shapes—purely Gaussian and flat-top with Gaussian edges—are focused in the same way, so the scheme does not depend on a finely tuned profile.
  • A sequence of bunches spaced half a plasma wavelength apart after the precursor should each experience the same uniform focusing force, giving focused positron bunch trains.
  • Because the head and tail sit in decelerating and accelerating fields respectively, the lens can in principle reduce energy spread while focusing, helping preserve beam quality.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The energy-spread result is inferred from the charge-weighted average longitudinal field rather than from the actual energy distribution; rerunning the simulation with energy histograms at $t=0$ and $t=18\,\omega_{pe}^{-1}$ would confirm or refute it.
  • The long flat-top bunch requires a 'pulse focusing' mode because the focusing force becomes non-uniform with time; a natural extension is to modulate the plasma density or inter-bunch spacing to hold the force uniform over a long train.
  • Because the scheme works in the linear regime, it could be combined with hollow-electron-beam drivers to give a single plasma stage that both accelerates and focuses a positron train, though the paper does not test that combination.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a plasma-lens scheme, operating in the linear wakefield regime, for transverse focusing of positron bunches. A positron bunch-precursor excites a wakefield, and a trailing positron bunch is placed half a plasma wavelength behind so that its head is decelerated and its tail accelerated while the bunch experiences a focusing force. Two bunch profiles are studied with a claimed 2D3V cylindrically symmetric magnetohydrodynamic simulation: a short Gaussian bunch and a longer flat-top bunch with Gaussian edges. The authors report a factor-2.6 reduction of the bunch radius for the short bunch, a uniform 'plateau' of the radius over about 70% of the bunch, qualitatively similar behavior for the long bunch at early times, and identical uniform focusing for a sequence of bunches after a precursor. They further claim that the longitudinal field profile (negative at the head, positive at the tail) should reduce the energy spread. The paper presents no direct energy-spread diagnostic, no numerical method description, and no convergence study.

Significance. If the claimed effect is real, the scheme would be a useful addition to the relatively small toolbox for positron focusing in plasma wakefield accelerators, especially the idea of using a precursor to create a uniform focusing region for a train of positron bunches. The physical mechanism invoked, linear wakefield focusing of positrons, is plausible and consistent with earlier work on linear-regime wakefields. However, the manuscript's current value is limited by the absence of any numerical-method details, convergence checks, or direct validation of the energy-spread claim. The central quantitative result (the factor-2.6 compression) is therefore not independently checkable from the text as it stands. I credit the authors for choosing a clear and physically motivated parameter layout, but the paper currently reads as a short simulation report rather than a complete, reproducible study.

major comments (3)
  1. [Statement of the Problem] The simulation is not reproducible from the information given. The manuscript specifies only a '2d3v system with cylindrical symmetry', a 'magnetohydrodynamic plasma model', the window sizes (xi_max=33 c/omega_pe, r_max=5 c/omega_pe), and the normalization. It does not state the grid resolution, time step, macroparticle count, field solver, interpolation scheme, boundary conditions, or how the beam macroparticles are coupled to the MHD fluid, nor is any convergence or error analysis presented anywhere. This is load-bearing because the headline result, a final bunch radius of 0.05 c/omega_pe, is five times smaller than the initial radius and is close to a plausible radial grid scale; without a resolution study, the reported uniform 'plateau' and the factor-2.6 compression cannot be separated from numerical pinching or an inadequately resolved axis treatment.
  2. [Results of Simulation, Fig. 3 and Conclusions] The claim that the average longitudinal field profile 'will obviously contribute to the reduction of the energy spread' is not supported by the presented data. The quantity <Ez>(xi) is a cross-section average at a single time; it does not directly quantify the evolution of the bunch's energy spread. The actual energy spread change depends on the initial energy distribution, the correlation between particle energy and phase within the bunch, the bunch self-fields, and phase mixing, none of which are shown. To support this claim, the authors should either add a direct diagnostic of the energy-spread evolution (for example, the standard deviation of particle gamma as a function of time or xi) or soften the claim to a qualitative statement about the wakefield phase.
  3. [Fig. 4 caption and Conclusions] There is an internal quantitative inconsistency in the central focusing result. The caption of Fig. 4 reports rb/ra=0.48 for the second short bunch, which corresponds to a radius reduction by a factor of about 2.1, while the Conclusion states a reduction by a factor of 2.6. The initial radius is given as 0.1 c/omega_pe and the plateau radius as 0.05 c/omega_pe, which would be a factor of 2.0. The authors should clarify which definition is used for the initial radius and correct the inconsistent factor.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Statement of the Problem] The text gives lambda_pe = 2 pi c / omega_pe = 10.56 cm; with c/omega_pe = 16.82 micrometers this should be about 105.7 micrometers (or 0.0106 cm), not 10.56 cm.
  2. [Abstract] There is a typo in the abstract: 'a purely G aussian bunch' should read 'a purely Gaussian bunch'.
  3. [Results of Simulation] The quantity labeled Ez2 in Figs. 2, 5, and 7 is described only as the 'off-axis longitudinal electric field', but the off-axis radius at which it is evaluated is not specified; this should be stated for the plots to be interpretable.
  4. [Results of Simulation, Fig. 8] The claim that the focused bunch retains a 'semi-Gaussian' distribution is based on visual inspection of a few slices; a quantitative goodness-of-fit measure or a statement of the slice-to-slice variation would make this assertion more robust.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the paper's claims rest on self-contained numerical simulations; parameter choices are scenario design, not fitted inputs, and self-citations are contextual.

full rationale

The paper does not present an analytic derivation whose output is equivalent to its input. The central claim—that placing a positron bunch after a precursor in a particular wakefield phase yields transverse focusing—is supported by the simulation results shown in Figs. 2–8. The choice of bunch length equal to the plasma wavelength and bunch spacing of half a wavelength is explicitly described as the configuration under study ("the length of the precursor bunch and the second bunch is equal to the length of the plasma wave... and the distance between precursor and second bunch is λpe/2"), but this is standard simulation design, not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The focusing result, including the reported factor-of-2.6 radius reduction, is read off the simulated bunch radius evolution; it is not obtained by fitting a model to that same radius. The energy-spread-reduction statement ("This will obviously contribute to the reduction of the energy spread") is an unsupported qualitative inference from the averaged longitudinal field, and the manuscript does not track the actual energy spread; however, this is a correctness or reproducibility concern, not circularity, because no equation defines the energy spread in terms of the claim. Self-citations (e.g., refs. 2, 16, 22) appear only as background or prior context and are not load-bearing; no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from those works to force the conclusions. The simulation's lack of numerical details (resolution, time step, convergence) is a serious reproducibility issue, but it does not constitute circular reasoning. Accordingly, no circular step can be quoted and exhibited, and the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles, forces, or entities. The central claim rests on standard plasma wakefield physics, but with several domain assumptions about linearity, MHD validity, and negligible self-fields that are not verified. The simulation parameters are freely chosen to realize the desired phase relationship.

free parameters (5)
  • bunch length (short Gaussian) = lambda_pe = 2*pi*c/omega_pe
    Chosen to equal the plasma wavelength to create a resonant wakefield; central to the focusing phase.
  • distance between precursor and witness bunch = lambda_pe / 2
    Chosen to place the witness bunch in the desired focusing and energy-compensating phase.
  • bunch radius = 0.1 c/omega_pe
    Small radius chosen to sample the linear region of the wakefield; affects the focusing quality.
  • bunch current ratio = I_b1 = 5.1 A (precursor), I_b2 = 2 * I_b1
    Precursor current set to half the witness current to control wakefield amplitude; chosen by hand.
  • initial gamma factor = gamma = 5
    Relativistic factor chosen for the simulation; not justified in the paper but influences wakefield dynamics.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The plasma wakefield operates in the linear regime, providing linear transverse focusing forces.
    The paper assumes this throughout, but does not verify the linearity condition from the simulated fields. It is standard for low-charge bunches but could break if the witness bunch loads the wake.
  • domain assumption The magnetohydrodynamic plasma model with mobile ions and cold plasma (T_i=0) accurately represents the plasma response.
    Stated in the problem setup without validation against a fully kinetic model. MHD may miss kinetic effects like wave breaking or particle trapping that could affect focusing.
  • domain assumption The witness positron bunch's self-fields do not significantly perturb the wakefield created by the precursor.
    Implicit in the analysis; not stated or checked. Beam loading can alter the wakefield and the energy balance, potentially invalidating the energy spread claim.
  • ad hoc to paper The average longitudinal electric field <Ez> over the bunch cross section is sufficient to infer energy spread evolution.
    The paper uses <Ez> qualitatively to argue head deceleration and tail acceleration, but does not simulate or present the actual energy spread distribution, so this inference is an unsupported step.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Plasma lens for the focusing of positron bunches." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TUVFQLMU

@misc{pith2026250903225,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Plasma lens for the focusing of positron bunches},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TUVFQLMU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.03225}
}
read the original abstract

The development of effective focusing schemes for positron bunches in plasma accelerators remains a significant challenge, as nonlinear regimes fail to create stable focusing channels for positrons. This work presents a method for focusing and improving the quality of positron bunches using a plasma lens operating in the linear regime. Through numerical simulations, we investigate two distinct focused positron bunch profiles: a purely Gaussian bunch and an elongated, flat-top bunch with Gaussian rising and falling edges. For both configurations, the results demonstrate the capability to achieve high-quality transverse focusing. Furthermore, beyond focusing, the proposed system enables potential possibility to reduce energy spread of positron bunches of the sequence after precursor.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.03225 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. shows the case of the greatest achieved focusing of the bunch after precursor when lowest bunch radius in center is achieved (second bunch, movement from left to right). First consider the case (a) of Short Gaussian positron bunch case. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Azimuthal component Bf of the magnetic field depending on the longitudinal coordinate of the system. The magnetic field is formed by the bunch current and indicates its position. (a) Short Gaussian (cosine) bunch, (b) Long bunch with homogeneous center and Gaussian head and tail. Two main cases were considered ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. , 6 show the simulation results for case 2) of a long second positron bunch after bunch-precursor. The head and tail of the bunch have Gaussian charge distributions with length λpe/2. The central part has a homogeneous charge (current) distribution. The length of the homogeneous central part is λpe ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_5.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Longitudinal component of the electric field on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Radial component of the Lorentz force Fr (blue) acting on bunch particles, azimuthal component of the magnetic field Bf (orange), average bunch radius <rb> (green), off-axis longitudinal electric field Ez2 (black). ξ=z-ct. Sequence of short positron bunches after first…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (a) shows a focused second bunch after a precursor ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_8.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    GeV electron beams from a laser -wakefield accelerator

    W. P. Leemans, B. Nagler, A. J. Gonsalves, C. Toth, K. Nakamura, C. G. R. Geddes, E. Esarey. “GeV electron beams from a laser -wakefield accelerator” // Nat. Phys., 2006, v. 2, No. 10, pp. 696–699. doi: 10.1038/nphys418

    doi:10.1038/nphys418 2006

  2. [2]

    Investigation of Plasma Lenses in NSC KIPT

    I. N. Onishchenko et al. “Investigation of Plasma Lenses in NSC KIPT” // Problems of Atomic Science and Technology, 2012, No. 6(82), pp. 129–133

    work page 2012

  3. [3]

    Energy-Spread Preservation and High Efficiency in a Plasma-Wakefield Accelerator

    C. A. Lindstrøm, J. M. Garland, S. Schröder et al. “Energy-Spread Preservation and High Efficiency in a Plasma-Wakefield Accelerator” // Phys. Rev. Lett., 2021, Vol. 126, No. 1, p. 014801. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.014801

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.014801 2021

  4. [4]

    Simulation of the Identical Plateaus Formation on Plasma Wakefield for Long Driver-Bunch and Witness -Bunches

    D. O. Shendryk, R. T. Ovsiannikov, V. I. Maslov, J. Osterhoff, M. Thevenet. “Simulation of the Identical Plateaus Formation on Plasma Wakefield for Long Driver-Bunch and Witness -Bunches” // Problems of Atomic Science and Technology, 2023, No. 6(148), pp. 65–68. doi: 10.46813/2023-148-065

    work page doi:10.46813/2023-148-065 2023

  5. [5]

    Schemes of Electron Beam Loading in Blowout Regime in Plasma Wakefield Accelerators

    D. O. Shendryk, R. T. Ovsiannikov, V. I. Maslov et al. “Schemes of Electron Beam Loading in Blowout Regime in Plasma Wakefield Accelerators” // Proceedings of the 6th European Advanced Accelerator Concepts Workshop, Isola d’Elba, Italy, 2023, p. 35

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    Identical Decelerating Wakefields for Driver -Bunches and Identical Accelerating Wakefields for Witness - Bunches for Their Periodic Sequence

    I. V. Demydenko, V. I. Maslov. “Identical Decelerating Wakefields for Driver -Bunches and Identical Accelerating Wakefields for Witness - Bunches for Their Periodic Sequence” // Problems of Atomic Science and Technology, 2023, No. 3(145), pp. 108–111. doi: 10.46813/2023-145-108

    work page doi:10.46813/2023-145-108 2023

  7. [7]

    A Method for Maintaining the Acceleration Rate and Increasing the Energy of Self -Injected Bunch Due to the Use of Inhomogeneous Plasma

    D. S. Bondar, V. I. Maslov, I. N. Onishchenko. “A Method for Maintaining the Acceleration Rate and Increasing the Energy of Self -Injected Bunch Due to the Use of Inhomogeneous Plasma” // Problems of Atomic Science and Technology, 2023, No. 4(146), pp. 67–70. doi: 10.46813/2023-146-067

    doi:10.46813/2023-146-067 2023

  8. [8]

    Investigation of the Way of Phase Synchronization of a Self-Injected Bunch and an Accelerating Wakefield in Solid -State Plasma

    V. I. Maslov, D. S. Bondar, I. N. Onishchenko. “Investigation of the Way of Phase Synchronization of a Self-Injected Bunch and an Accelerating Wakefield in Solid -State Plasma” // Photonics, 2022, Vol. 9, p

    work page 2022

Show all 35 references
  1. [9]

    Investigation of the Way of Phase Synchronization of a Self-Injected Bunch and an Accelerating Wakefield in Solid -State Plasma

    V. I. Maslov, D. S. Bondar, I. N. Onishchenko. “Investigation of the Way of Phase Synchronization of a Self-Injected Bunch and an Accelerating Wakefield in Solid -State Plasma” // T. Tajima, P. Chen (Eds.), Progress in Laser Accelerator and Future Prospects , 2023, pp. 141–147

    2023

  2. [10]

    Plateau Formation on Accelerating Wakefield for Electron -Witness-Bunch and on Decelerating Wakefield for Driver -Bunches in a Plasma

    V. I. Maslov, R. T. Ovsiannikov, D. S. Bondar, I. P. Levchuk, I. N. Onishchenko. “Plateau Formation on Accelerating Wakefield for Electron -Witness-Bunch and on Decelerating Wakefield for Driver -Bunches in a Plasma” // Problems of Atomic Science and Technology, 2021, No. 6(13...

    2021 doi

  3. [11]

    Positron transport and acceleration in beam -driven plasma wakefield accelerators using plasma columns

    S. Diederichs, T. J. Mehrling, C. Benedetti, C. B. Schroeder, A. Knetsch, E. Esarey, J. Osterhoff. “Positron transport and acceleration in beam -driven plasma wakefield accelerators using plasma columns” // Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams, 2019, v. 22, No. 8, p p. 081301. doi: 10.1103...

    2019 doi

  4. [12]

    Research progress on advanced positron acceleration

    M. Si, Y. Huang. “Research progress on advanced positron acceleration” // Eur. Phys. J. A, 2024, v. 60, No. 210. doi: 10.1140/epja/s10050-024-01433-0

    2024 doi

  5. [13]

    Positron Acceleration by Plasma Wakefields Driven by a Hollow Electron Beam

    N. Jain, T. M. Antonsen, J. P. Palastro. “Positron Acceleration by Plasma Wakefields Driven by a Hollow Electron Beam” // Phys. Rev. Lett., 2015, v. 115, No. 19, pp. 195001. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.195001

    2015 doi

  6. [14]

    Laser -driven high- quality positron sources as possible injectors for plasma-based accelerators

    A. Alejo, R. Walczak, G. Sarri. “Laser -driven high- quality positron sources as possible injectors for plasma-based accelerators” // Sci. Rep., 2019, v. 9, No. 5279, doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41650-y

    2019 doi

  7. [15]

    Observation of Plasma Focusing of a 28.5 GeV Positron Beam

    J. S. T. Ng et al. “Observation of Plasma Focusing of a 28.5 GeV Positron Beam” // Phys. Rev. Lett., 2001, v. 87, No. 24, pp. 244801, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.244801

    2001 doi

  8. [16]

    Plasma lens for electron and positron beams

    D. S. Bondar, V. I. Maslov, I. N. Onishchenko, R. T. Ovsiannikov. “Plasma lens for electron and positron beams” // Problems of Atomic Science and Technology, 2021, No. 4(134), pp. 70–73, doi: 10.46813/2021-134-070

    2021 doi

  9. [17]

    Focusing by wakefield and plasma focusing of relativistic electrons in dependence on parameters of experiments

    I. P. Levchuk, V. I. Maslov, I. N. Onishchenko. “Focusing by wakefield and plasma focusing of relativistic electrons in dependence on parameters of experiments” // Problems of Atomic Science and Technology, 2016, No. 103(3), pp. 62–65

    2016

  10. [18]

    Focusing of relativistic electron bunches by nonresonant wakefield excited in plasma

    V. I. Maslov, I. P. Levchuk, I. N. Onishchenko. “Focusing of relativistic electron bunches by nonresonant wakefield excited in plasma ” // Problems of Atomic Science and Technology, 2015, No. 98(4), pp. 120–123

    2015

  11. [19]

    Plasma wakefield excitation providing homogeneous focusing of electron bunches

    V. I. Maslov, I. N. Onishchenko, I. P. Yarovaya. “Plasma wakefield excitation providing homogeneous focusing of electron bunches ” // Problems of Atomic Science and Technology, 2013, No. 1, pp. 134–136

    2013

  12. [20]

    Homogeneous focusing field for short relativistic electron bunches in plasma

    V. I. Maslov, I. P. Levchuk, D. S. Bondar, I. N. Onishchenko. “ Homogeneous focusing field for short relativistic electron bunches in plasma ” // Problems of Atomic Science and Technology, 2020, No. 127(3), pp. 68–72

    2020

  13. [21]

    Passive plasma lens, reducing energy spread of Gaussian -kind bunches

    I. V. Demydenko, V. I. Maslov. “Passive plasma lens, reducing energy spread of Gaussian -kind bunches ” // Problems of Atomic Science and Technology, 2024, No. 3, pp. 67–72. doi: 10.46813/2024-151-067

    2024 doi

  14. [22]

    Simulation of plasma wakefield focusing and self - focusing of a short sequence of electron bunches depending on the bunch length, shape and distance between bunches

    D. S. Bondar, V. I. Maslov, I. N. Onishchenko. “Simulation of plasma wakefield focusing and self - focusing of a short sequence of electron bunches depending on the bunch length, shape and distance between bunches” // Problems of Atomic Science and Technology, 2022, No. 6, pp....

    2022 doi

  15. [23]

    Self- focusing and wakefield-focusing of relativistic electron bunches in plasma

    I. P. Levchuk, V. I. Maslov, I. N. Onishchenko. “Self- focusing and wakefield-focusing of relativistic electron bunches in plasma ” // IPAC 2016 Proc. of 7th Int. Particle Accelerator Conf., 2016, pp. 2602–2604

    2016

  16. [24]

    Homogeneous focusing of train of short relativistic electron bunches by plasma wakefield

    I. P. Levchuk, V. I. Maslov, I. N. Onishchenko. “Homogeneous focusing of train of short relativistic electron bunches by plasma wakefield ” // IPAC 2016 Proc. of 7th Int. Particle Accelerator Conf., 2016, pp. 2599–2601

    2016

  17. [25]

    Plasma focusing for high -energy beams

    P. Chen, J. J. Su, T. Katsouleas, S. Wilks, J. M. Dawson. “Plasma focusing for high -energy beams” // IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci., 1987, v. 15, No. 2, pp. 218 – 225, doi: 10.1109/TPS.1987.4316688

    1987

  18. [26]

    Acceleration and focusing of positron bunch in a dielectric wakefield accelerator with plasma in transport channel

    P. I. Markov, R. R. Kniaziev, G. V. Sotnikov. “Acceleration and focusing of positron bunch in a dielectric wakefield accelerator with plasma in transport channel” // J. Instrum., 2022, v. 17, No. 11, pp. P11013, doi: 10.1088/1748-0221/17/11/P11013

    2022 doi

  19. [27]

    Focusing of positron bunch when moving in electron bunch wakefield in the dielectric waveguide filled with plasma

    G. V. Sotnikov, R. R. Knyazev, P. I. Markov, I. N. Onishchenko. “Focusing of positron bunch when moving in electron bunch wakefield in the dielectric waveguide filled with plasma” // Problems of Atomic Science and Technology, 2021, No. 4(134), pp. 49–54, doi: 10.46813/2021-134-049

    2021 doi

  20. [28]

    Designing a plasma lens as a matching device for the ILC positron source

    M. Formela, N. Hamann, K. Flöttmann, G. Moortgat- Pick, S. Riemann. “Designing a plasma lens as a matching device for the ILC positron source” // Proc. Int. Workshop on Future Linear Colliders (LCWS2021), 15–18 March 2021, C21-03-15.1 doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2105.14008

    2021 doi arXiv

  21. [29]

    Plasma lens backgrounds at a future linear collider

    A. W. Weidemann, P. Chen, C. -K. Ng. “Plasma lens backgrounds at a future linear collider” // Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 2003, v. 18, No. 16, pp. 2857–2869, doi: 10.1142/S0217751X03016331

    2003 doi

  22. [30]

    Investigation of plasma stability of the prototype plasma lens for positron matching

    N. Hamann, H. Jones, G. Loisch, M. Formela, K. Ludwig, J. Osterhoff, G. Moortgat-Pick. “Investigation of plasma stability of the prototype plasma lens for positron matching” // EPJ Web Conf., 2024, v. 315, No. 02003, pp. 1–6, doi: 10.1051/epjconf/202431502003

    2024

  23. [31]

    Compact and tunable active - plasma lens system for witness extraction and driver removal

    A. Del Dotto et al. “Compact and tunable active - plasma lens system for witness extraction and driver removal” // J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 2020, v. 1596, No. 012050, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1596/1/012050

    2020 doi

  24. [32]

    Nonlinear laser driven donut wakefields for positron and electron acceleration

    J. Vieira, J. T. Mendonça. “Nonlinear laser driven donut wakefields for positron and electron acceleration” // Phys. Rev. Lett., 2014, v. 112, No. 21, pp. 215001, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.215001

    2014 doi

  25. [33]

    Halo formation and emittance growth of positron beams in plasmas

    P. Muggli et al. “Halo formation and emittance growth of positron beams in plasmas” // Phys. Rev. Lett., 2008, v. 101, No. 5, pp. 055001, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.055001

    2008 doi

  26. [34]

    Plasma lenses

    J. J. Su, T. Katsouleas, J. M. Dawson. “Plasma lenses” // Proc. IEEE Particle Accelerator Conf., 1989, Chicago, IL, USA, v. 2, pp. 894–896, doi: 10.1109/PAC.1989.73293 ПЛАЗМОВА ЛІНЗА ДЛЯ ФОКУСУВАННЯ ПОЗИТРОННИХ ЗГУСТКІВ Д. С. Бондар, К. А. Ліндстрем, В. І. Маслов, І. М. Оніщен...

    1989

  27. [174]

    doi: 10.3390/photonics9030174

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.