Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 7 minor 31 references

Polync varieties and multiparameter Kulikov models

T0 review · 4 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper proves that d-semistable, K-trivial 'polync' varieties—singular spaces locally modelled on products of normal-crossing singularities—have unobstructed log smooth deformations, giving multiparameter semistable smoothings with smoot

desk verdict Genuinely new framework for multiparameter degenerations with strong examples, but the smoothing theorem inherits risk from a sketched log-structure construction and two deferred results; worth a serious referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2601.21871 v2 pith:TVBIAA7X submitted 2026-01-29 math.AG math.SG

Philip Engel This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AGmath.SG MSC 14D1514D0614J2814J32
keywords polyncvarietiesd-semistabilitylogsmoothdeformationsKulikovmodelsK3surfaceslogarithmicBogomolov–Tian–Todorovtheoremmonodromyconesemistablemorphism
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes a multiparameter generalization of the classical smoothability theorem for degenerations of Calabi–Yau varieties. It introduces 'polync varieties'—singularities that are locally products of normal-crossing singularities—and defines d-semistability for them via a color-coding of the dual polysimplicial complex. The central theorem states that any proper, d-semistable, colorable polync variety with trivial dualizing sheaf and algebraic components has unobstructed log smooth deformations, yielding a smoothing over a polydisk whose total space is smooth: a multiparameter Kulikov model. This matters because such smooth total spaces let one specialize algebraic cycle classes transversely to the central fiber, a tool recently used to attack questions about algebraic cycles and rationality. The paper also works out combinatorial period maps and monodromy cones for polysnc K3 surfaces, and gives explicit examples including a four-parameter model based on the rhombicuboctahedron and a ten-parameter degeneration of elliptic K3 surfaces.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing construction is the S-coloring of the dual polysimplicial complex of a polync variety: each simplex factor of each stratum gets a color, and stratum inclusions must be compatible. Colors index both the base parameters of the smoothing and the summands of the sheaf Ext^1(Ω^1, O), which turns out to be a direct sum of line bundles L_s supported on the color-s singular locus. d-semistability means each L_s is trivial; Proposition 2.2 converts this into a log structure of semistable type by gluing local transition systems. The logarithmic Bogomolov–Tian–Todorov theorem—applied to this log smooth, saturated, log Calabi–Yau object over the logarithmic point with monoid N^S—then de

What would settle it

Run the omitted converse of Proposition 2.2 on a concrete S-colored polync variety, e.g. the rhombicuboctahedral polysnc K3 surface of Example 4.2: if its local transition systems cannot be chosen so that the product of units equals one on every double overlap, then no log structure of semistable type exists even though the L_s are trivial—disproving Proposition 2.2 and removing the input to the logarithmic Bogomolov–Tian–Todorov theorem that Theorem 2.5 requires.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that d-semistability—the vanishing, for each color, of an obstruction line bundle on the color's singular locus—is exactly the condition that a polync variety carries a 'log structure of semistable type.' Once that log structure is in hand, the logarithmic Bogomolov–Tian–Todorov theorem applies, because the log structure is log smooth and saturated and the dualizing sheaf is trivial. The conclusion is that log smooth deformations are unobstructed, and the universal formal deformation can be realized by an analytic semistable morphism from a smooth space to a polydisk of dimension equal to the number of colors plus the number of locally trivial parameters. The same machinery

Load-bearing premise

The theorem stands on the equivalence in Proposition 2.2 between d-semistability and the existence of a log structure of semistable type; the reverse direction is omitted in the paper, and if it is false for some S-colored polync variety, the logarithmic Bogomolov–Tian–Todorov theorem can no longer be applied and the smoothability claim is unsupported.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The universal log smooth deformation of a d-semistable K-trivial polync variety is a Kulikov model over a polydisk, with smooth total space; any transverse S-dimensional slice is again a Kulikov model.
  • If the central fiber is projective with an ample line bundle, the deformation algebraizes to a projective semistable smoothing over a power series ring.
  • For polysnc Type III K3 surfaces, d-semistability is equivalent to a purely combinatorial period condition φ(ξ_G)=1 for every slab G, and the naive dimension of the d-semistable locally trivial deformation space is 20−|S|.
  • The monodromy cone is generated by vectors λ_s whose self and mutual intersections count triangles and squares of each color; for the paper's examples the Gram matrix is nondegenerate, giving a 10-dimensional nilpotent orbit recovering a known lattice-polarized K3 moduli space.
  • Polysnc surface Kulikov models subdivide into 1-parameter Kulikov models by crepant resolutions, preserving the dual complex's homeomorphism type.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the number of base parameters equals the number of colors, an S-coloring is not just bookkeeping: it is a combinatorial choice of how many smoothing directions are 'active', so one could design degenerations with prescribed monodromy cones by coloring dual complexes appropriately.
  • The same log-BTT route should extend to d-semistable polync degenerations of higher-dimensional Calabi-Yau and to abelian varieties via the Mumford construction, giving multiparameter Kulikov models beyond surfaces.
  • The period-map criterion for polysnc K3 surfaces suggests a direct combinatorial algorithm to decide smoothability of a given triangle-square decomposition of S^2, which could be automated and used to search for new explicit multiparameter degenerations.
  • If the omitted reverse direction of Proposition 2.2 fails in some multi-color case, one would still have the forward direction: log structures give d-semistability, so the smoothability theorem would apply anyway to the (possibly smaller) class of log-smoothable varieties.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper introduces polync varieties (étale/analytic products of normal-crossing singularities) with an S-coloring of their dual polysimplicial complex, and defines d-semistability for such varieties. The central theorem (Theorem 2.5) asserts that a proper, d-semistable, S-colored, polync variety with trivial dualizing sheaf has unobstructed log smooth deformations over the log point 0_S, yielding formal and analytic semistable smoothings over a multiparameter base, as a generalization of Friedman's and Kawamata–Namikawa's smoothing theorems. The proof is via the logarithmic Bogomolov–Tian–Todorov theorem, using a log structure of semistable type supplied by Proposition 2.2. Sections 3–4 specialize to K-trivial surfaces: dual complexes, numerical d-semistability, period maps, parameter counts, monodromy cones, and explicit multiparameter Kulikov models, including a rhombicuboctahedron example and degenerations of elliptic K3 surfaces.

Significance. If the main smoothing theorem and the supporting log-structure dictionary are fully established, this would be a substantial extension of classical 1-parameter smoothing theory to higher-dimensional bases, with potential applications to moduli and degeneration theory. The surface-theoretic framework (slabs, monodromy cones, conservation of charge) is attractive and the examples are informative. However, the current manuscript leaves several load-bearing statements unproved or explicitly deferred—most notably the forward direction of Proposition 2.2, the log smoothness/saturation claim in Proposition 2.3, Proposition 3.10, and Proposition 3.15(5)—so the significance is conditional on these gaps being filled.

major comments (4)
  1. [§2, Proposition 2.2] The forward direction (d-semistability ⇒ existence of a log structure of semistable type) is the input to the log BTT theorem and therefore to Theorem 2.5. The proof is only a sketch: the simultaneous modification of transition systems on overlaps of mixed-color strata, so that the product-of-units condition ∏_j u^{(j),λμ}_s = 1 holds globally for every color s, is asserted without detailed verification. The statement that the log structures of different colors 'do not interact at all' needs justification on overlaps where multiple colors appear, and the cocycle condition on triple overlaps is not proved for the multi-color case. A complete proof, or a precise reduction to [23] with all multi-color modifications spelled out, is required before Theorem 2.5 can be regarded as fully established.
  2. [§2, Proposition 2.3] It is claimed that the log structure of semistable type provided by Proposition 2.2 is log smooth and saturated, with proof reduced to [25, Thm. 3.5] and the definition of saturated morphisms. This is a critical step because the log BTT theorem of [15] requires a saturated log smooth morphism over the log point. The hypotheses of [25, Thm. 3.5] are not verified explicitly; in particular, it is not immediate that the local charts on a polync variety with mixed colors define a saturated log structure. Please expand the proof so the reader can see precisely how the cited theorem applies.
  3. [§3, Proposition 3.10 and Corollary 3.12] Proposition 3.10 characterizes d-semistability of polysnc Type III K3 surfaces in terms of the period φ_{X0} vanishing on slab classes. The proof is omitted ('similar to the snc case'), yet the proposition is used in Corollary 3.12 to assert the existence of a d-semistable locally trivial deformation, which in turn justifies why the examples in Section 4 are smoothable. Since this is a central step in the surface theory, the authors should provide a proof or a precise reference that covers the polync setting.
  4. [§3, Proposition 3.15(5) and Example 4.2] Part (5) of Proposition 3.15 is explicitly deferred to future work, but Example 4.2 uses it to assert that the universal d-semistable deformation of the rhombicuboctahedron surface is X → Δ^4 × Δ^16, with Δ^16 the locally trivial d-semistable deformations. The dimension count in Proposition 3.14 is also 'naive' and is explicitly conditional on the surjectivity statement that (5) supplies. As written, the dimension claims in Example 4.2 are therefore unsupported. The authors should either prove (5), weaken the example to a conditional statement, or find an independent argument for the dimension.
minor comments (7)
  1. [§1, Definition 1.6] The definition of 'polysimplicial complex' uses 'polyhedral complex' in the same sentence; consistent terminology would help.
  2. [§1, Proposition 1.16] The notation T^0 for the tangent space of Spec C[[u_s]] is unconventional; consider using Der(C[[u_s]], C) or the usual tangent space.
  3. [§3, Exercise 3.5] Exercise 3.5 is stated as an exercise but is used later (e.g., in Corollary 3.12). It should be labeled as a lemma or its proof sketched.
  4. [§3, Proposition 3.13] The definition of Q(V,D) = χ_top(V\D) is clear, but the term 'charge' is not standard; a brief comment on its origin would help.
  5. [§4, Example 4.2] The claim that over V(u_red) the fiber is an snc Type III K3 surface 'in the same locally trivial deformation class as the octahedral surface' would benefit from a brief justification or a reference to the relevant figure.
  6. [General] The paper uses 'polysnc' and 'polync' interchangeably in places; standardize the terminology after first definition.
  7. [§3, Proposition 3.3] The sentence 'The argument of Proposition 3.3 is quite general' is a comment on the proof and would read better in the proof itself.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Theorem 2.5 follows from external log-BTT input; the paper's omissions are proof gaps, not circular reductions.

full rationale

The central claim, Theorem 2.5, is a direct application of the external logarithmic Bogomolov-Tian-Todorov theorem [15] (Felten-Petracci, building on [9,14]) to a log structure of semistable type. The hypotheses (proper, d-semistable, S-colored, trivial dualizing sheaf, algebraic components) are inputs, not outputs; d-semistability is not fitted to or derived from the smoothing conclusion. Proposition 2.2 supplies the required log structure: the forward direction is explicitly adapted from Kato [23] ('The same proof as [23] applies nearly verbatim'), and Proposition 2.3 cites Kato [25] for log smoothness and saturation. These are external sources, not self-citations. The paper's own prior work appears mainly in Section 4 and in period-map constructions (e.g., [4,5,6,10,11,12]); none of these is load-bearing for Theorem 2.5, and Proposition 3.13 gives a first proof of conservation of charge independent of the self-cited [11] route. The explicit omissions are correctness risks, not circularity: Proposition 2.2 explicitly omits the reverse direction; Proposition 3.10 says 'Proof. Omitted'; Proposition 3.15(5) says 'We leave (5) to be proven in other work.' If the forward direction of Proposition 2.2 or Proposition 3.15(5) fails, the smoothing theorem or the example dimension counts would not follow, but that is an incompleteness concern, not a reduction of the conclusion to the hypothesis by construction. No circular step can be exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The framework rests on the recent log BTT theorem as a black box; the paper's new contribution is the definitions, the reduction to log structures, and the examples. No numerical parameters are fitted to data. The main unproven or omitted steps are Prop 2.2 (reverse direction), Prop 3.10, and Prop 3.15(5).

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Logarithmic Bogomolov-Tian-Todorov theorem [15, Thm. 1.1]
    The central unobstructedness result is applied as a black box; the paper does not prove it.
  • standard math Kato's criterion for log smooth and saturated morphisms [25, Thm. 3.5]
    Used in Proposition 2.3 to show the log structure of semistable type is log smooth and saturated.
  • standard math Kato's log smooth deformation theory [23]
    Proposition 2.2 is adapted 'nearly verbatim' from [23], including the omitted reverse direction.
  • standard math Formal-to-analytic smoothing [31, Thm. B.1]
    Used to pass from the formal universal deformation to an analytic smoothing over a polydisk.
  • standard math Classification of 1-parameter Kulikov models [27, 30, 19]
    Proposition 3.3 reduces the polync surface classification to these known results after crepant resolution.
  • domain assumption Integral-affine and tropical correspondence for log CY pairs [21, 10, 4]
    Example 4.3 reads log CY pairs and charges from an integral-affine structure on S^2, citing [4].
invented entities (2)
  • Polync variety (generalized semi-stable variety) independent evidence
    purpose: Object of study; extends normal-crossing singularities to products of nc singularities to support multiparameter degenerations.
    Concrete local equations (1) and explicit examples in Section 4 instantiate the definition; existence is checkable by gluing.
  • S-coloring / d-semistability structure independent evidence
    purpose: Decomposes Ext^1 into line bundles L_s and defines the deformation-theoretic condition that makes the log BTT theorem applicable.
    The coloring is explicitly realized in the rhombicuboctahedron and elliptic K3 examples, and the period-map obstruction φ(ξ_G)=1 in Prop 3.10 is checkable once proven.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Polync varieties and multiparameter Kulikov models." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TVBIAA7X

@misc{pith2026260121871,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Polync varieties and multiparameter Kulikov models},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TVBIAA7X}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2601.21871}
}
read the original abstract

We study "polync varieties", whose singularities are locally products of normal crossing (nc) singularities. We introduce the notion of d-semistability of such varieties, and generalize work of Friedman and Kawamata-Namikawa to address the smoothability of d-semistable, K-trivial, polync varieties. These results are applications of recent breakthroughs on the logarithmic Bogomolov-Tian-Todorov theorem, due to Chan-Leung-Ma and Felten-Filip-Ruddat. We generalize the combinatorial description of Kulikov models for K3 surfaces to the setting of a multiparameter base and describe some interesting examples.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.21871 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Two 2-dimensional polysimplices and one 3-dimensional polysimplex [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Left: Colorable polysimplicial complex of dimension 2, colored by the set S = {blue, green, red}. Right: 2-dimensional polysimplicial complex that admits no coloring; the chain of 2-simplices forces the two 1-simplex factors of the square to be colored by the same element of S. Example 1.4. Any simplex is a polysimplex with only one factor. A cube in any dimension is a polysimplex, being a product of intervals, i.e.… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Some snc surfaces built from platonic solids surface X0 = S i Vi defined as follows: Let (V k , Dk ) be a log CY surface pair for which Dk is a cycle of 2 ≤ k ≤ 6 curves of self-intersection −1 (the analogue for k = 1 is actually a pair (V 1 , D1 ) where D1 is an irreducible nodal anticanonical divisor of self intersection +1). Then X0 is defined by gluing copies of (V k , Dk ) exactly so that Γ(X0) = Γ. For example… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Rhombicuboctahedron, colored by four colors [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Polysnc Type III K3 surface with dual complex the rhombicuboctahedron We now compute the monodromy cone, generated by λred, λyellow λgreen, λblue as defined in Proposition 3.15. We have the following values: n△, red = 8, n△, yellow = n△, green = n△, blue = 0, n□, red, …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Dual complex of a polysnc Type III K3 surface, colored by 10 colors. Color index: (1) dark blue, (2) light blue, (3) green, (4) light green, (5) yellow, (6) light orange, (7) orange, (8) orange-red, (9) pink-red, (10) dark red. example, (V1, D1) ≃ (V20, D20) are both t…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 4 linked inside Pith

  1. [23]

    Log smooth deformation theory.arXiv: alg-geom/9406004, 1994

    Fumiharu Kato. Log smooth deformation theory.arXiv: alg-geom/9406004, 1994

    arXiv 1994

  2. [15]

    The logarithmic Bogomolov-Tian-Todorov theorem.Bull

    Simon Felten and Andrea Petracci. The logarithmic Bogomolov-Tian-Todorov theorem.Bull. Lond. Math. Soc., 54(3):1051–1066, 2022

    2022

  3. [1]

    Logarithmic geometry and moduli

    DanAbramovich, QileChen, DannyGillam, YuhaoHuang, MartinOlsson, MatthewSatriano, andShenghao Sun. Logarithmic geometry and moduli. InHandbook of Moduli: Volume I, volume 24 ofAdvanced Lectures in Mathematics (ALM), pages 1–61. International Press, Somerville, MA, 2013

    2013

  4. [2]

    Weak semistable reduction in characteristic 0.Inventiones Mathematicae, 139:241–273, 02 2000

    Dan Abramovich and Kalle Karu. Weak semistable reduction in characteristic 0.Inventiones Mathematicae, 139:241–273, 02 2000

    2000

  5. [3]

    Adiprasito, G

    K. Adiprasito, G. Liu, and M. Temkin. Semistable reduction in characteristic 0.Séminaire Lotharingien de Combinatoire, 82B:Art. 25, 10, 2020

    2020

  6. [4]

    Compactifications of moduli of elliptic K3 surfaces: stable pair and toroidal.Geom

    Valery Alexeev, Adrian Brunyate, and Philip Engel. Compactifications of moduli of elliptic K3 surfaces: stable pair and toroidal.Geom. Topol., 26(8):3525–3588, 2022

    2022

  7. [5]

    Compactifications of moduli spaces of K3 surfaces with a nonsymplectic involution.arXiv:2208.10383, 2022

    Valery Alexeev and Philip Engel. Compactifications of moduli spaces of K3 surfaces with a nonsymplectic involution.arXiv:2208.10383, 2022

    arXiv 2022

  8. [6]

    Compact moduli of K3 surfaces.Ann

    Valery Alexeev and Philip Engel. Compact moduli of K3 surfaces.Ann. of Math. (2), 198(2):727–789, 2023

    2023

Show all 31 references
  1. [7]

    Zack Garza, and Luca Schaffler

    Valery Alexeev, Philip Engel, D. Zack Garza, and Luca Schaffler. Compact moduli of Enriques surfaces of degree 2.Nagoya Mathematical Journal, 259:581–624, 2025

    2025

  2. [8]

    Stable pair compactification of moduli of K3 surfaces of degree 2.J

    Valery Alexeev, Philip Engel, and Alan Thompson. Stable pair compactification of moduli of K3 surfaces of degree 2.J. Reine Angew. Math., 799:1–56, 2023

    2023

  3. [9]

    Geometry of the Maurer-Cartan equation near degenerate Calabi-Yau varieties.J

    Kwokwai Chan, Naichung Conan Leung, and Ziming Nikolas Ma. Geometry of the Maurer-Cartan equation near degenerate Calabi-Yau varieties.J. Differential Geom., 125(1):1–84, 2023

    2023

  4. [10]

    Looijenga’s conjecture via integral-affine geometry.J

    Philip Engel. Looijenga’s conjecture via integral-affine geometry.J. Differential Geom., 109(3):467–495, 2018

    2018

  5. [11]

    Combinatorics and Hodge theory of degen- erations of abelian varieties: A survey of the Mumford construction, 2025.https://philip-engel.github

    Philip Engel, Olivier de Gaay Fortman, and Stefan Schreieder. Combinatorics and Hodge theory of degen- erations of abelian varieties: A survey of the Mumford construction, 2025.https://philip-engel.github. io/SurveyMumford.pdf

    2025

  6. [12]

    Matroids and the integral Hodge conjecture for abelian varieties, 2025.https://philip-engel.github.io/IHCforAV.pdf

    Philip Engel, Olivier de Gaay Fortman, and Stefan Schreieder. Matroids and the integral Hodge conjecture for abelian varieties, 2025.https://philip-engel.github.io/IHCforAV.pdf

    2025

  7. [13]

    Springer, Cham, 2025

    Simon Felten.Global logarithmic deformation theory, volume 2373 ofLecture Notes in Mathematics. Springer, Cham, 2025

    2025

  8. [14]

    Smoothing toroidal crossing spaces.Forum Math

    Simon Felten, Matej Filip, and Helge Ruddat. Smoothing toroidal crossing spaces.Forum Math. Pi, 9:e7, 36, 2021. 22 ENGEL

    2021

  9. [16]

    Global smoothings of varieties with normal crossings.Ann

    Robert Friedman. Global smoothings of varieties with normal crossings.Ann. of Math. (2), 118(1):75–114, 1983

    1983

  10. [17]

    On the geometry of anticanonical pairs.arXiv:1502.02560, 2015

    Robert Friedman. On the geometry of anticanonical pairs.arXiv:1502.02560, 2015

    2015 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Smoothing cusp singularities of small length.Math

    Robert Friedman and Rick Miranda. Smoothing cusp singularities of small length.Math. Ann., 263(2):185– 212, 1983

    1983

  12. [19]

    Morrison

    Robert Friedman and David R. Morrison. The birational geometry of degenerations: an overview. InThe birational geometry of degenerations (Cambridge, Mass., 1981), volume 29 ofProgr. Math., pages 1–32. Birkhäuser, Boston, MA, 1983

    1981

  13. [20]

    TypeIIIdegenerations ofK3surfaces.Invent

    Robert Friedman and Francesco Scattone. TypeIIIdegenerations ofK3surfaces.Invent. Math., 83(1):1–39, 1986

    1986

  14. [21]

    Mirror symmetry for log Calabi-Yau surfaces I.Publ

    Mark Gross, Paul Hacking, and Sean Keel. Mirror symmetry for log Calabi-Yau surfaces I.Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci., 122:65–168, 2015

    2015

  15. [22]

    Moduli of surfaces with an anti-canonical cycle.Compos

    Mark Gross, Paul Hacking, and Sean Keel. Moduli of surfaces with an anti-canonical cycle.Compos. Math., 151(2):265–291, 2015

    2015

  16. [24]

    Log smooth deformation theory.Tohoku Math

    Fumiharu Kato. Log smooth deformation theory.Tohoku Math. J. (2), 48(3):317–354, 1996

    1996

  17. [25]

    Logarithmic structures of Fontaine-Illusie

    Kazuya Kato. Logarithmic structures of Fontaine-Illusie. II—Logarithmic flat topology.Tokyo J. Math., 44(1):125–155, 2021

    2021

  18. [26]

    Logarithmic deformations of normal crossing varieties and smoothing of degenerate Calabi-Yau varieties.Invent

    Yujiro Kawamata and Yoshinori Namikawa. Logarithmic deformations of normal crossing varieties and smoothing of degenerate Calabi-Yau varieties.Invent. Math., 118(3):395–409, 1994

    1994

  19. [27]

    Viktor S. Kulikov. Degenerations ofK3surfaces and Enriques surfaces.Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat., 41(5):1008–1042, 1199, 1977

    1977

  20. [28]

    Triangulations of the sphere and degenerations of K3 surfaces.arXiv:0809.0937, 2008

    Radu Laza. Triangulations of the sphere and degenerations of K3 surfaces.arXiv:0809.0937, 2008

    2008 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Log structures on generalized semi-stable varieties.Acta Math

    Ting Li. Log structures on generalized semi-stable varieties.Acta Math. Sin. (Engl. Ser.), 23(7):1217–1232, 2007

    2007

  22. [30]

    Degeneration of surfaces with trivial canonical bundle.Ann

    Ulf Persson and Henry Pinkham. Degeneration of surfaces with trivial canonical bundle.Ann. of Math. (2), 113(1):45–66, 1981

    1981

  23. [31]

    Period integrals from wall structures via tropical cycles, canonical coor- dinates in mirror symmetry and analyticity of toric degenerations.Publ

    Helge Ruddat and Bernd Siebert. Period integrals from wall structures via tropical cycles, canonical coor- dinates in mirror symmetry and analyticity of toric degenerations.Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci., 132:1–82, 2020. Department of Mathematics, Statistics, and Compute...

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.