Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 31 references

Holomorphic immersions of bi-disks into $9$ dimensional real hypersurfaces with Levi signature $(2, 2)$

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Two equations obstruct holomorphic bi-disks in (2,2)-CR hypersurfaces

desk verdict Main torsion obstruction theorem is plausible and new, but the paper's advertised example is invalid—for their hypersurface T1 actually vanishes, so the non-immersion claim collapses. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.08305 v2 pith:TYMIGXD6 submitted 2019-08-22 math.DG math.CV

Wei Guo Foo (AMSS) , Joel Merker (LM-Orsay) This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.DGmath.CV MSC 32V0532V2032V35
keywords holomorphicimmersionsbi-disksCRmanifoldsLevisignature(22)CartanequivalencemethodexteriordifferentialsystemsisotropicplanesunitarygroupU(2)
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper seeks a necessary condition for a holomorphic bi-disk $\mathbb{D}^2$ to sit inside a real-analytic real hypersurface $M^9\subset\mathbb{C}^5$ whose Levi form has signature $(2,2)$ at every point. It establishes that if such an immersion exists and passes through the origin, then after lifting the image to the product space $M^9\times U(2)$ the lifted image must lie in the zero set of two complex-valued torsion functions $T_1$ and $T_2$. Because each complex equation is two real equations, the existence of a bi-disk is an overdetermined problem, and generically the two functions block it. The paper demonstrates the obstruction concretely on the hypersurface $u=|z_1|^2+|z_2|^2-|z_3|^2-|z_4|^2+|z_1|^2(z_1+\bar z_1)$, where $T_1$ does not vanish near the origin, so no holomorphic bi-disk passes through that point. A careful reader should care because this turns a transcendental existence question in CR geometry into a finite algebraic computation depending only on the defining function.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is a Pfaffian system on $M^9\times U(2)$ built from an adapted coframe $\{\alpha_0,\alpha_1,\alpha_2,\alpha_3,\alpha_4\}$ that diagonalizes the Levi form as $d\theta\equiv \sqrt{-1}(\alpha_1\wedge\bar\alpha_1+\alpha_2\wedge\bar\alpha_2-\alpha_3\wedge\bar\alpha_3-\alpha_4\wedge\bar\alpha_4)\mod\theta$. Sommer's theorem identifies every totally isotropic complex 2-plane, i.e. a two-dimensional complex tangent plane on which the Levi form vanishes, with a unique matrix $\left(\begin{smallmatrix}P&Q\\R&S\end{smallmatrix}\right)\in U(2)$; this provides the lift and guarantees the positive $2\times2$ block is invertible. The adapted 1-forms $\omega_3=\alpha_3-P\alpha_1-Q\alpha_2$ and $\omega_4=\alpha_4-R\alpha_1-S\alpha_2$ vanish on the pushed-forward tangent bundle of the bi-disk. Exterior differentiation, absorption of torsion, Cartan's lemma, and the skew-hermitian identity $(U^*dU)^*=-U^*dU$ for the Maurer-Cartan form force the two compatibility equations $T_1=T_2=0$; under those equations the resulting skew-hermitian matrix $\tau$ of 1-forms pulls back to zero and satisfies the structure equation $d\tau\equiv d\Sigma+\Sigma\wedge\Sigma\mod I+\langle\tau\rangle$, so the process continues by the standard structure equations of real hypersurfaces.

What would settle it

For any explicit real-analytic hypersurface $M^{9}$ with Levi signature (2,2), choose an adapted coframe and compute the torsion functions T1 and T2; if either is nonzero at the origin, the theorem forbids a holomorphic bi-disk through the origin, and the example gives T1=-2/(1+2z1+2\bar z1)\neq0 there. The theorem would be falsified by finding a smooth φ:$D^{2}$→$M^{9}$ with φ(0)=0, φ*ω0=φ*ω3=φ*ω4=0 and φ*(α1∧\barα1∧α2∧\barα2)≠0 whose lift has T1 or T2 nonzero; the paper's calculation says this cannot happen because skew-hermiticity forces the compatibility equations. A finite symbolic computation of T1 and T2 on families of defining functions would settle which nearby hypersurfaces admit bi-disks and would test the obstruction's sharpness.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 3.20. Let $M^9\subset\mathbb{C}^5$ be real-analytic, pass through the origin, and have Levi form of signature $(2,2)$ at each point. If $\varphi:\mathbb{D}^2\to M^9$ is a holomorphic immersion with $\varphi(0)=0$, then its uniquely determined lift $\tilde\varphi:\mathbb{D}^2\to M^9\times U(2)$ has image inside the simultaneous zero set of $T_1:=\bar B+E-\bar F$ and $T_2:=\bar D+J-\bar H$, where $B,D,E,F,H,J$ are torsion coefficients appearing in the exterior derivatives of the adapted coframe. Hence if either function is not identically zero on $M^9\times U(2)$, no such bi-disk exists. For the explicit hypersurface $u=|z_1|^2+|z_2|^2-|z_3|^2-|z_4|^2+|z_1|^2(z_1+\bar z_1)$, the first obstruction equals $-2/(1+2z_1+2\bar z_1)$, which is nonzero near the origin, so this hypersurface contains no holomorphic bi-disk through the origin. Thus the paper's main discovery is a computable pair of complex obstructions, equivalently four real obstructions, to the existence of holomorphic bi-disks in Levi-indefinite CR manifolds of signature $(2,2)$.

Load-bearing premise

The argument rests on Sommer's theorem (stated as Theorem 2.5, with proof attributed to the unpublished manuscript [21]) that every totally isotropic complex 2-plane for the Levi form of signature (2,2) is represented by a unique U(2) matrix and that its positive 2x2 block is invertible; if that parameterization broke down, the lift to $M^{9}$×U(2) would not exist and the entire torsion computation would collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any holomorphic bi-disk in a $(2,2)$-signature real-analytic hypersurface must satisfy four real equations on the lifted space $M^9\times U(2)$, so existence is generically overdetermined.
  • If $T_1$ or $T_2$ is nonzero at some point of $M^9\times U(2)$, no holomorphic immersion of $\mathbb{D}^2$ through that point exists.
  • The explicit hypersurface $u=|z_1|^2+|z_2|^2-|z_3|^2-|z_4|^2+|z_1|^2(z_1+\bar z_1)$ has $T_1=-2/(1+2z_1+2\bar z_1)\neq0$ near the origin, exhibiting a concrete instance where the obstruction is effective.
  • When $T_1=T_2\equiv0$, the paper's prolongation provides the skew-hermitian 1-form matrix $\tau$ and the structure equation $d\tau\equiv d\Sigma+\Sigma\wedge\Sigma\mod I+\langle\tau\rangle$, so the Cartan process can be continued and eventually expressed through the S-tensor of the classical structure equations.
  • The same computation gives a direct algorithm: starting from any defining function of $M^9$, compute an adapted coframe and the torsion coefficients, then check whether $T_1$ and $T_2$ vanish identically.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial extension: for signature $(p,p)$ hypersurfaces in $\mathbb{C}^{2p+1}$ the same argument should replace $U(2)$ by $U(p)$ and should yield a skew-hermitian matrix of obstructions; the two functions proved here are the $p=2$ instance of that pattern.
  • Editorial extension: a testable project is to symbolically compute $T_1$ and $T_2$ for families of small perturbations of the flat model $u=|z_1|^2+|z_2|^2-|z_3|^2-|z_4|^2$; the loci where they vanish should describe the hypersurfaces that admit bi-disks, in analogy with rigidity results for Levi-indefinite models.
  • Editorial extension: although the paper computes the obstructions in a chosen adapted coframe, the theorem's conclusion that they must vanish on any holomorphic bi-disk implies $T_1$ and $T_2$ transform equivariantly under coframe changes; identifying their invariant geometric meaning would likely connect them to curvature or torsion invariants of the CR structure.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper applies Cartan's equivalence method / exterior differential systems to the question of whether a 9-dimensional real-analytic CR hypersurface M^9 ⊂ C^5 with Levi signature (2,2) contains a holomorphically immersed bi-disk through a given point. The main theoretical result, Theorem 3.20, states that for any such immersion the unique lift to M^9 × U(2) must lie in the zero set of two complex-valued functions T1 = \bar B + E - \bar F and T2 = \bar D + J - \bar H, where A,...,J are torsion coefficients arising from the exterior derivatives dα1, dα2. The paper then claims, in Section 6, that the explicit hypersurface u = |z1|^2 + |z2|^2 - |z3|^2 - |z4|^2 + |z1|^2(z1 + \bar z1) has T1 = -2/(1+2z1+2\bar z1), which is nonzero, and therefore contains no holomorphic bi-disk through the origin. The abstract and introduction advertise this as the main application of the necessary-condition theorem.

Significance. If Theorem 3.20 is correct, it provides a new necessary condition for the existence of holomorphic bi-disks in CR hypersurfaces of signature (2,2), and the two complex obstructions are a natural analog of Bryant's Lorentzian disk obstruction. The derivation in Section 3 is detailed and the skew-Hermitian absorption algebra appears internally consistent, which is a genuine strength. However, the advertised example in Section 6 is invalid: a direct exterior derivative computation shows that for the given hypersurface the torsion coefficient E vanishes, and hence T1 = T2 = 0. The paper therefore does not establish any concrete non-existence result, and the central application claimed in the abstract is unsupported. The manuscript also defers a key calculation in Section 5 to a self-reference [11] and relies for the lift on Sommer's theorem as proved in an unpublished manuscript [21]; these gaps further reduce the completeness of the paper. No machine-checked proofs or reproducible code accompany the manuscript.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 6.3, displayed formula for dα1] The coefficient of α1∧α2 in the printed formula for dα1 is incorrect. Directly, α1 = P dz1 + Q dz2, so dα1 = dP∧dz1 + dQ∧dz2. Substituting dz1 = (1/P)α1 - (Q/(PR))α2 and dz2 = (1/R)α2 gives the (2,0) coefficient as -Q/(PR)A1(P) - (1/P)A2(P) + (1/R)A1(Q), not (1/R)A1(P) - Q/(PR)A1(R) - (1/P)A2(P). For the example in Section 6, Q=0, R=1, and P is independent of z2, so this correct coefficient is 0. Hence E = 0, and since B = F = 0 as well, T1 = \bar B + E - \bar F = 0; similarly T2 = 0. The claimed nonzero value -2/(1+2z1+2\bar z1) is spurious, and the hypersurface u = |z1|^2+|z2|^2-|z3|^2-|z4|^2+|z1|^2(z1+\bar z1) does not obstruct holomorphic bi-disks according to the paper's own theorem.
  2. [Section 6.4, numerical value of \bar B + E - \bar F] Even if one uses the paper's printed (incorrect) formulas in Section 6.4, the numerical evaluation is inconsistent with those formulae. With Q=0, R=1, and A2(P)=0, the displayed expression \bar B + E - \bar F = -1/R A1(P) + Q/(PR) A1(R) + 2/P A2(P) reduces to -A1(P) = -1/(1+2z1+2\bar z1), not -2/(1+2z1+2\bar z1). The factor-of-two discrepancy is a separate internal inconsistency in the example computation.
  3. [Section 5, equations (5.4)-(5.6)] The passage from the displayed formulas for d\check M_{ij} to the coefficients D_{ij}, E_{ij}, F_{ij}, G_{ij} in the expression for dτ is deferred to reference [11], which is the same arXiv submission (arXiv:1908.08305). This self-reference makes the Chern-Moser formulation in Section 5 and the claimed structural equation dτ ≡ dΣ + Σ∧Σ in Theorem 4.9 unverifiable from the manuscript itself. Since this is part of the paper's advertised equivalence-method program, the omission is load-bearing.
  4. [Theorem 2.5] The lift into M^9 × U(2) and all subsequent torsion derivations depend on Sommer's theorem, which the paper states as Theorem 2.5 but credits as proved in Merker's unpublished manuscript [21]. No proof or published reference is provided in the present paper. If the theorem were unavailable, the uniqueness of the lift and the invertibility of the 2×2 positive block would fail, collapsing the derivation. The manuscript should either include a proof or cite a publicly available source for this statement.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 6, defining equation] The displayed hypersurface equation in the introduction to Section 6 contains a duplicated term: 'u = |z1|^2 + |z2|^2 - |z2|^2 - |z3|^2 + G' should presumably read 'u = |z1|^2 + |z2|^2 - |z3|^2 - |z4|^2 + G'.
  2. [Section 3.1.2, equation before display (3.17)] In the line after equation (3.16), the first 2-form is written as 'd\tilde\omega_3 = \tilde M_{31} ∧ α1 + \tilde M_{31} ∧ α2'; the second occurrence of \tilde M_{31} should be \tilde M_{32}.
  3. [Section 6.4, notation] The notation in Section 6.4 uses θ both for the contact form and for a matrix entry in the U(2) matrix, which is confusing; the matrix entry should be renamed (for example, τ or σ).
  4. [Section 4, ideal in equation (4.7)] The displayed differential ideal in equation (4.7) lists 'ω 3, ω 4' without bars in the second group; these should presumably be \bar\omega_3 and \bar\omega_4 to match the conjugate generators of the ideal.
  5. [Section 6.1, Levi form notation] Equation (6.1) writes the Levi form as dα0 = α1∧\barα1 + α2∧\barα2 - α3∧\barα3 - α4∧\barα4, omitting the factor √-1 that appears in the earlier structural equations; this is likely an omitted constant but should be made consistent.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the derivation of T1 and T2 is self-contained, and the self-references are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's derivation of the two complex torsion obstructions T1 = \bar B + E - \bar F and T2 = \bar D + J - \bar H is self-contained: it starts from the Pfaffian system (3.1), differentiates d\omega_3 and d\omega_4 modulo the ideal I, absorbs torsion into the Maurer-Cartan matrix U* dU, and then uses only the skew-hermitian property of U* dU together with Cartan's lemma to force the compatibility conditions (3.19). No parameter is fitted to a subset of data, and no target quantity is inserted as an assumption. The only self-references are Theorem 2.5's proof deferred to Merker's unpublished manuscript [21] and the pointer in Section 5 to [11] for omitted Chern-Moser terms; neither carries the argument. Sommer's theorem is attributed to the published reference [29] and is a parameter-free linear-algebra fact about isotropic planes for the form (++--), independent of the bi-disk existence claim, so under the review rules it does not raise the circularity score. The separate objection that the Section 6 computation of d\alpha_1 may be algebraically wrong is a correctness issue, not a circularity: an erroneous evaluation of E would affect the example's conclusion without making the derivation equivalent to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no empirical free parameters; the variables hat kappa and hat sigma in Section 4 are Cartan prolongation unknowns, not fitted values. The axioms are standard CR and Cartan background plus the real-analytic signature-(2,2) hypothesis. A minor self-citation appears because Sommer's theorem is cited through Merker's unpublished manuscript [21].

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Real analytic CR hypersurface M^9 in C^5 with Levi non-degenerate form of signature (2,2) admits a local adapted coframe diagonalizing dtheta with signs (++--).
    Used throughout Sections 2-6; this is standard linear algebra for real-analytic Levi non-degenerate hypersurfaces.
  • standard math Sommer's theorem (Theorem 2.5): every totally isotropic complex p-plane is parameterized uniquely by a matrix in U(n_-,n_+), and the leading p by p block is invertible.
    Load-bearing for the unique lift into M^9 x U(2); cited to Sommer [29] and to Merker's manuscript [21], with no proof included in the paper.
  • standard math Cartan's lemma: if phi^*tilde M31 wedge delta plus phi^*tilde M32 wedge epsilon = 0 with delta and epsilon independent, then the pulled-back 1-forms are linear combinations of delta and epsilon with symmetric coefficients.
    Used in Section 3.1.3 to reduce the vanishing 2-forms to coefficient equations.
  • domain assumption Chern-Moser structure equations (1.6) and the S-tensor expansion apply to the non-positive-definite signature (2,2) case.
    Used in Section 5 to express dtau in terms of S-invariants; assumes the Chern-Moser normalization extends to this signature.
  • domain assumption The example hypersurface's Levi matrix has a positive definite 2 by 2 minor near the origin, so the signature is (2,2) in a neighborhood of the origin.
    Used in Section 6 to ensure the example satisfies the theorem's local hypotheses.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Holomorphic immersions of bi-disks into $9$ dimensional real hypersurfaces with Levi signature $(2, 2)$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TYMIGXD6

@misc{pith2026190808305,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Holomorphic immersions of bi-disks into $9$ dimensional real hypersurfaces with Levi signature $(2, 2)$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TYMIGXD6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.08305}
}
abstract

Inspired by an article of R. Bryant on holomorphic immersions of unit disks into Lorentzian CR manifolds, we discuss the application of Cartan's method to the question of the existence of bi-disk $\mathbb{D}^{2}$ in a smooth $9$-dimensional real analytic real hypersurface $M^{9}\subset\mathbb{C}^{5}$ with Levi signature $(2,2)$ passing through a fixed point. The result is that the lift to $M^{9}\times U(2)$ of the image of the bi-disk in $M^{9}$ must lie in the zero set of two complex-valued functions in $M^{9}\times U(2)$. We then provide an example where one of the functions does not identically vanish, thus obstructing holomorphic immersions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

  1. [11]

    Holomorphic immersions of bi-disks into $9$ dimensional real hypersurfaces with Levi signature $(2, 2)$

    FOO, W .G., MERKER , J.: Holomorphic Immersions of bi-disks into 9 dimensional real hypersurfaces with Levi signature (2, 2). arXiv: 1908.08305

    work page Pith review arXiv 1908

  2. [21]

    MERKER , J.: Holomorphic Curves in Lorentzian CR Manifolds: Effective aspects, written manuscript

    work page

  3. [1]

    BELOSHAPKA , V .K., E ZHOV , V ., S CHMALZ , G.: Canonical Cartan connection and holomorphic invariants on Engel CR manifolds . Russ. J. Math. Phys. 14(2), 121–133 (2007)

    work page 2007

  4. [2]

    BLUMAN , G.W .; K UMEI , S.: Symmetries and differential equations , Springer-V erlag, Berlin, 1989, xiv+412 pp

    work page 1989

  5. [3]

    L.; C HERN , S

    BRYANT, R. L.; C HERN , S. S.; G ARDNER , R. B.; G OLDSCHMIDT , H. L.; G RIFFITHS , P . A.: Exterior differential systems. Mathematical Sciences Research Institute Publications, 1 8. Springer-V erlag, New Y ork, 1991. viii+475 pp. ISBN: 0-387-97411-3

    work page 1991

  6. [4]

    BRYANT, Robert L.: Holomorphic curves in Lorentzian CR-manifolds . Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 272 (1982), no. 1, 203–221

    work page 1982

  7. [5]

    CARTAN, É.: Sur la géométrie pseudo-conforme des hypersurfaces de l’es pace de deux variables com- plexes, I. Ann. Math. Pura Appl. 11, 17–90 (1932)

    work page 1932

  8. [6]

    CARTAN, É.: Sur la géométrie pseudo-conforme des hypersurfaces de l’es pace de deux variables com- plexes, II. Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa 1, 333–354 (1932)

    work page 1932

Show all 31 references
  1. [7]

    AMS/IP Studies in Advanced Mathematics , 19

    CHEN , So-Chin; S HAW, Mei-Chi: Partial differential equations in several complex variables. AMS/IP Studies in Advanced Mathematics , 19. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI; Inter national Press, Boston, MA, 2001. xii+380 pp. ISBN: 0-8218-1062-6

    2001

  2. [8]

    S.; M OSER , J

    CHERN , S. S.; M OSER , J. K.: Real hypersurfaces in complex manifolds . Acta Math. 133 (1974), 219–271

    1974

  3. [9]

    EZHOV , V .; ISAEV , A.V .; SCHMALZ ,G.: Invariants of elliptic and hyperbolic CR-structures of cod i- mension 2. Int. J. Math. 10(1), 1–52 (1999)

    1999

  4. [10]

    EZHOV , V ., MCLAUGHLIN , B., S CHMALZ , G.: From Cartan to T anaka: getting real in the complex world. Not. Am. Math. Soc. 58(1), 20–27 (2011)

    2011

  5. [12]

    Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, 32

    JACOBOWITZ , Howard: An introduction to CR structures. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, 32. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1990. x+23 7 pp. ISBN: 0-8218-1533-4

    1990

  6. [13]

    ISAEV , A., Z AITSEV , D.: Reduction of five-dimensional uniformly Levi degenerate CR structures to absolute parallelisms. J. Geom. Anal. 23(3), 1571–1605 (2013)

    2013

  7. [14]

    Cartan for beginners.: Differential geometry via mov- ing frames and exterior differential systems

    IVEY , Thomas A.; L ANDSBERG , Joseph M. Cartan for beginners.: Differential geometry via mov- ing frames and exterior differential systems . Second edition [of MR2003610]. Graduate Studies in Mathematics, 175. American Mathematical Society, Provide nce, RI, 2016. xviii + 453 ...

    2016

  8. [15]

    MEDORI , C.; S PIRO , A.: The equivalence problem for five-dimensional Levi degenera te CR manifolds. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 20, 5602–5647 (2014). 28

    2014

  9. [16]

    Mathematical Sciences, 154 (2008), no

    MERKER , J.: Lie symmetries and CR geometry, J. Mathematical Sciences, 154 (2008), no. 6, 817–922

    2008

  10. [17]

    arXiv:1311.7522

    MERKER , J.: Equivalences of 5-dimensional CRmanifolds,III: Six model s and (very) elementary nor- malizations. arXiv:1311.7522

    arXiv

  11. [18]

    arXiv:1312.1084

    MERKER , J.: Equivalences of 5-dimensional CR manifolds, IV: Six ambigu ity matrix groups (Initial G-structures). arXiv:1312.1084

    arXiv

  12. [19]

    arXiv:1312.5688

    MERKER , J.: Equivalences of 5-dimensional CR-manifolds V: Six initial frames and coframes; Explic- itness obstacles. arXiv:1312.5688

    arXiv

  13. [20]

    (Editor); L IE, S

    MERKER , J. (Editor); L IE, S. (Author): Theory of Transformation Groups I. General Properties of Continuous Transformation Groups. A Contemporary Approac h and Translation , Springer-V erlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2015, xv+643 pp

    2015

  14. [22]

    Explicit Absolute Parallelism for 2-Nondegenerate Real Hy persurfaces M 5 ⊂ C3 of Constant Levi Rank 1

    MERKER , J.; P OCCHIOLA S. Explicit Absolute Parallelism for 2-Nondegenerate Real Hy persurfaces M 5 ⊂ C3 of Constant Levi Rank 1 . The Journal of Geometric Analysis (Feb 2018), pp 1-42

    2018

  15. [23]

    Izvestiya Math

    MERKER , J.; S ABZEVARI , M.: The Cartan equivalence problem for Levi-non-degenerate re al hyper- surfaces M 3 ⊂ C2. Izvestiya Math. 78, 1158–1194 (2014)

    2014

  16. [24]

    MERKER , J.; S ABZEVARI , M.: Cartan equivalences for 5-dimensional CR-manifolds in C4. J. Geom. Anal. 26 (2016), no. 4, 3194–3251

    2016

  17. [25]

    Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1995, xvi+525 pp

    OLVER, P .J.:Equivalence, Invariance and Symmetries. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1995, xvi+525 pp

    1995

  18. [26]

    arXiv:1405.1341

    POCCHIOLA , S.: Canonical Cartan connection for 4-dimensional CR-manifol ds belonging to general class II. arXiv:1405.1341

    arXiv

  19. [27]

    arXiv:1405.1342

    POCCHIOLA , S.: Canonical Cartan connection for 5-dimensional CR-manifol ds belonging to general class III2. arXiv:1405.1342

    arXiv

  20. [28]

    SCHMALZ , G.; S PIRO , A.: Explicit construction of a Chern-Moser connection for CR ma nifolds of codimension two. Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. 4 185(3), 337–379 (2006)

    2006

  21. [29]

    SOMMER , F.: Komplexe-analytische Blätterung reeller Hyperflächen im Cn, Math. Ann. 137 (1959), S392-411

    1959

  22. [30]

    Part II: Several Complex V ariables.Translations of Mathematical Monographs, Amer

    SHABAT , B.V .:Introduction to Complex Analysis. Part II: Several Complex V ariables.Translations of Mathematical Monographs, Amer. Math. Soc., vol. 110, 1992, x+371 pp

    1992

  23. [31]

    TANAKA , N.: On the pseudo-conformal geometry of hypersurfaces of the space of n complex variables. J. Math. Soc. Jpn. 14, 397–429 (1962). WEI GUO FOO . H UA LOO -K ENG CENTER FOR MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES , A CADEMY OF MATHEMATICS AND SYSTEMS SCIENCE , C HINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCE...

    1962

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.