pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.12457 · v2 · pith:TYNDEKKDnew · submitted 2026-06-07 · ⚛️ physics.gen-ph

Quantum Entanglement Beyond Kinematics: A Dynamical Hypothesis in (3,2)-Dimensional Spacetime

Marco Pettini This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 05:34 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.gen-ph
keywords quantum entanglementextra temporal dimensionbulk fieldnull geodesicsBell pairsdynamical collapsewarped geometry
0
0 comments X

The pith

A massless bulk field in an extra temporal dimension mediates quantum entanglement correlations via null geodesics while forbidding controllable superluminal signals.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper derives a (3,2)-dimensional spacetime geometry from five-dimensional vacuum Einstein equations under Z2 symmetry and proposes that entanglement arises dynamically when a massless bulk field, sourced on the brane, travels through the extra time coordinate. Equal-time correlations at large brane separations follow from the E=0 family of null geodesics without allowing controllable faster-than-light signaling. The same field replaces the hidden vector in an extended Bohm-Bub collapse model, yielding deterministic evolution at fixed microstate and Born-rule statistics after ensemble averaging. Extending the setup to two independent Bell pairs produces a cross-pair correlation whose strength scales with the square of the intra-pair to inter-pair separation ratio.

Core claim

Within the warped-product metric fixed uniquely by the five-dimensional vacuum Einstein equations with Z2 symmetry, a massless bulk field X_a(x,t,τ) sourced by preparation and measurement events on the brane propagates causally through the extra-time dimension; equal-time correlations at arbitrarily large brane separation arise via the E=0 null geodesic family without admitting controllable superluminal signaling, the propagation time and crossed ratios emerge from the null geodesic kinematics, and the Bohm-Bub framework extended by the brane-projected bulk field gives deterministic collapse at fixed contextual microstate λ with Born statistics from an equivariant ensemble; when applied to t

What carries the argument

The massless bulk field X_a(x,t,τ) sourced on the brane and propagating through the extra temporal dimension, whose E=0 null geodesics generate the observed correlations.

If this is right

  • The time of propagation and the crossed ratios of earlier work follow directly from the null geodesic kinematics rather than being postulated.
  • Collapse remains deterministic at each fixed contextual microstate λ while Born statistics emerge from averaging over an equivariant ensemble.
  • The bulk field sourced by one Bell pair reaches the detectors of a second independent pair and induces a measurable cross-pair correlation.
  • The cross-pair correlation strength scales exactly as the square of the intra-pair to inter-pair separation ratio.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Confirmation of the predicted scaling would supply a direct experimental distinction between this dynamical account and standard quantum mechanics.
  • The framework supplies a concrete dynamical mechanism that could be examined for consistency with other no-signaling constraints in relativistic settings.
  • The same bulk-field mediation could be tested in higher-order entanglement configurations beyond two pairs.

Load-bearing premise

The extra temporal dimension together with the warped-product metric supplies the physical mediator for entanglement correlations.

What would settle it

Detection or absence of a cross-pair correlation between two independent Bell pairs whose magnitude scales with the square of the ratio of intra-pair separation to inter-pair separation, measurable with existing photonic Bell-test apparatus.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.12457 by Marco Pettini.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic arrangement (adapted from Ref. [1]) for a strong cross-pair test. Two nominally independent Bell ex￾periments are operated simultaneously. The spatial arrange￾ment is chosen so that the distance between Alice and Eve is much shorter than the distances Alice–Bob and Eve–Tom. Standard shielding and timing controls are required to sup￾press conventional cross-talk and pairing artifacts. A CHSH￾type … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Quantum entanglement produces nonlocal correlations for which no local dynamical account is known. In Ref.[1] we proposed that these correlations are mediated through an extra temporal dimension and introduced a $(3,2)$-dimensional spacetime framework on a phenomenological basis; the present paper derives that framework from the bulk geometry. A single extra spatial dimension admits no effective superluminal shortcut on the brane, this rules it out as a candidate mediator and motivates the extra-time setting. Within the warped-product metric ansatz the five-dimensional vacuum Einstein equations fix the warp factor uniquely, leaving no freedom in the geometry once $\mathbb{Z}_2$ symmetry is imposed. A massless bulk field $\mathscr{X}_a(\mathbf{x},t,\tau)$, sourced on the brane by the preparation event and by the measurement interactions, propagates causally through the extra-time dimension; equal-time correlations at arbitrarily large brane separation arise via the $E=0$ null geodesic family, without admitting controllable superluminal signaling. The propagation time and crossed ratios of Ref.~\cite{PRR}, previously postulated, emerge here from the null geodesic kinematics. The Bohm--Bub collapse framework is extended to a bipartite entangled system by replacing the abstract hidden vector with the brane-projected bulk field $\mathscr{X}_a$. At fixed contextual microstate $\lambda$ collapse is deterministic; Born statistics follow upon averaging over an equivariant ensemble. When the framework is extended to two independent Bell pairs, the bulk field sourced by one pair reaches the detectors of the other and induces a cross-pair correlation scaling as the square of the intra-pair to inter-pair separation ratio, a concrete falsifiable prediction with no counterpart in standard quantum mechanics, accessible with existing photonic Bell-test technology.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper derives a (3,2)-dimensional warped-product geometry from the five-dimensional vacuum Einstein equations under Z2 symmetry. It introduces a massless bulk field sourced on the brane that propagates causally through the extra temporal dimension via E=0 null geodesics to mediate equal-time entanglement correlations at arbitrary brane separations without controllable superluminal signaling. The work extends the Bohm-Bub collapse framework by replacing the hidden vector with the brane-projected bulk field, yielding deterministic collapse at fixed contextual microstate λ and Born statistics upon ensemble averaging. It predicts a cross-pair correlation for two independent Bell pairs that scales as the square of the intra-pair to inter-pair separation ratio, presented as a falsifiable test using existing photonic Bell-test technology. Previously postulated quantities such as propagation time and crossed ratios are claimed to emerge from the null geodesic kinematics.

Significance. If the derivation of the unique warp factor and the explicit scaling prediction are rigorously supported, the manuscript supplies a dynamical mechanism for entanglement correlations together with a concrete, parameter-free falsifiable output that has no counterpart in standard quantum mechanics. The provision of an explicit testable prediction is a strength.

major comments (3)
  1. [Einstein equations / metric derivation] The abstract and the section deriving the metric from the 5D vacuum Einstein equations claim that Z2 symmetry fixes the warp factor uniquely with no remaining freedom. The explicit solution of the Einstein equations (including the form of the warp factor and verification that no auxiliary assumptions enter) must be shown to confirm this uniqueness claim, as it is load-bearing for the subsequent geodesic analysis.
  2. [Bulk field and null geodesics] In the section on bulk field propagation, the assertion that the E=0 null geodesic family produces equal-time brane correlations at arbitrary separation while forbidding controllable superluminal signaling requires an explicit calculation of the field propagation and the induced correlation function to demonstrate that the result follows directly from the metric without additional inputs.
  3. [Two-pair extension and correlation prediction] The extension to two independent Bell pairs and the claimed cross-pair correlation scaling as the square of the intra- to inter-pair separation ratio is a central falsifiable prediction. The explicit computation showing how the bulk field sourced by one pair reaches the detectors of the other and produces precisely this quadratic scaling must be provided, including the relevant separation variables and any averaging over the ensemble.
minor comments (2)
  1. The notation for the bulk field \mathscr{X}_a(x,t,τ) and its brane projection should be introduced with a clear definition and index conventions at the first appearance.
  2. References to the author's prior work (Ref.[1]) and to Ref. PRR should explicitly distinguish which quantities were postulated there versus derived here, to clarify the logical flow.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and for recognizing the potential significance of a dynamical mechanism with a concrete falsifiable prediction. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to supply the requested explicit derivations and calculations.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Einstein equations / metric derivation] The abstract and the section deriving the metric from the 5D vacuum Einstein equations claim that Z2 symmetry fixes the warp factor uniquely with no remaining freedom. The explicit solution of the Einstein equations (including the form of the warp factor and verification that no auxiliary assumptions enter) must be shown to confirm this uniqueness claim, as it is load-bearing for the subsequent geodesic analysis.

    Authors: We agree that the uniqueness claim requires an explicit, step-by-step solution. The manuscript states that the five-dimensional vacuum Einstein equations under the warped-product ansatz and Z2 symmetry fix the warp factor with no remaining freedom, but we will expand the relevant section to display the full derivation, the resulting warp-factor form, and verification that no auxiliary assumptions are introduced. This will be added in the revised version. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Bulk field and null geodesics] In the section on bulk field propagation, the assertion that the E=0 null geodesic family produces equal-time brane correlations at arbitrary separation while forbidding controllable superluminal signaling requires an explicit calculation of the field propagation and the induced correlation function to demonstrate that the result follows directly from the metric without additional inputs.

    Authors: The equal-time correlations at arbitrary brane separation are obtained from the E=0 null geodesic family of the derived metric. To make this fully explicit, we will add the detailed calculation of the massless bulk field propagation along these geodesics and the induced brane correlation function, confirming that the result follows directly from the metric geometry without further inputs and that controllable superluminal signaling remains forbidden. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Two-pair extension and correlation prediction] The extension to two independent Bell pairs and the claimed cross-pair correlation scaling as the square of the intra- to inter-pair separation ratio is a central falsifiable prediction. The explicit computation showing how the bulk field sourced by one pair reaches the detectors of the other and produces precisely this quadratic scaling must be provided, including the relevant separation variables and any averaging over the ensemble.

    Authors: The cross-pair correlation is induced when the bulk field sourced by one Bell pair propagates through the extra-time dimension to the detectors of the second pair. We will include the explicit computation in the revised manuscript, specifying the intra-pair and inter-pair separation variables, demonstrating the quadratic scaling, and showing the ensemble averaging that produces the reported correlation while preserving the deterministic collapse at fixed contextual microstate λ. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation self-contained from Einstein equations; no circularity

full rationale

The paper adopts a warped-product metric ansatz with Z2 symmetry, derives the warp factor uniquely from the 5D vacuum Einstein equations, extracts the E=0 null geodesic family for causal bulk propagation of the massless field, extends the Bohm-Bub framework using the brane-projected field, and obtains a new cross-pair correlation scaling as a concrete prediction. The self-citation to Ref.[1] is only for the initial phenomenological motivation of extra time (which is independently motivated here by ruling out extra space); the propagation times and ratios are shown to emerge from the new geometry rather than being presupposed. No step reduces by construction to fitted inputs, self-citations, or prior ansatzes; the chain is independent and supplies an externally falsifiable output.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on the 5D Einstein equations and Z2 symmetry to determine the geometry, with the extra time dimension and bulk field introduced as the mechanism for entanglement without additional free parameters in the geometry.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Five-dimensional vacuum Einstein equations
    Used to fix the warp factor uniquely under the warped-product metric ansatz and Z2 symmetry.
  • domain assumption Z2 symmetry imposed on the geometry
    Imposed to leave no freedom in the geometry.
invented entities (2)
  • Extra temporal dimension no independent evidence
    purpose: To mediate nonlocal entanglement correlations via causal propagation in the bulk
    Introduced as the mediator after ruling out extra spatial dimension; no independent evidence provided beyond the framework itself.
  • Massless bulk field X_a(x,t,tau) no independent evidence
    purpose: To source and propagate the entanglement correlations from preparation and measurement events
    Postulated to extend the Bohm-Bub framework; sourced on the brane but no external falsifiable handle given.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5849 in / 1799 out tokens · 37597 ms · 2026-06-29T05:34:11.376621+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    self” terms arise fromY(AB) (resp.Y (ET)) projected at the Alice–Bob (resp. Eve–Tom) stations, and the “cross

    Loophole controls and distance-dependence test Of course, to perform a loophole-free test of this kind the polariser settings at each of the four stations must be changed randomly while the photons are in flight be- tween the sources and the polarisers, so that no setting is correlated with the source emission or with the ori- entations at the other stati...

    2014

  2. [2]

    Pettini,Quantum Entanglement without nonlocal cau- sation in (3,2)-dimensional spacetime, Phys

    M. Pettini,Quantum Entanglement without nonlocal cau- sation in (3,2)-dimensional spacetime, Phys. Rev. Re- search7, 013261 (2025)

    2025

  3. [3]

    Aspect,Proposed experiment to test the separable hidden-variables theories, Phys

    A. Aspect,Proposed experiment to test the separable hidden-variables theories, Phys. Lett.A54, 117 (1975); A. Aspect,Proposed experiment to test the nonseparabil- ity of quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev.D14, 1944 (1976)

    1975

  4. [4]

    Aspect, P

    A. Aspect, P. Grangier, and G. Roger,Experimental re- alization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm Gedankenex- periment - A new violation of Bell inequalities, Phys. Rev. Lett.49, 91 (1982)

    1982

  5. [5]

    Aspect, J

    A. Aspect, J. Dalibard, and G. Roger,Experimental test of Bell’s inequalities using time-varying analyzers, Phys. Rev. Lett.49, 1804 (1982)

    1982

  6. [6]

    Weihs, T

    G. Weihs, T. Jennewein, C. Simon, H. Weinfurter, and A. Zeilinger,Violation of Bell’s Inequality under Strict Einstein Locality Conditions, Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 5039 (1998)

    1998

  7. [7]

    Tittel, J

    W. Tittel, J. Brendel, H. Zbinden, and N. Gisin,Vio- lation of Bell Inequalities by Photons More Than 10 km Apart, Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 3563 (1998)

    1998

  8. [8]

    Ursin, et al.,Entanglement-based quantum communi- cation over 144 km, Nature Phys.3, 481 (2007)

    R. Ursin, et al.,Entanglement-based quantum communi- cation over 144 km, Nature Phys.3, 481 (2007)

    2007

  9. [9]

    Hensen et al.,Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres, Nature 526, 682 (2015)

    B. Hensen et al.,Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres, Nature 526, 682 (2015)

    2015

  10. [10]

    The full quotation of Newton’s sentence can be found in the second paper of Ref.[10]

  11. [11]

    P. H. Eberhard,A realistic model for Quantum Theory with a locality property, in W. Shommers (Ed.),Quantum Theory and Pictures of Reality, (Springer, Berlin, 1989); P. H. Eberhard,Restoring Locality with Faster-Than- Light Velocities, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Report LBL-34575 (1993), available athttp://www.osti.gov/ bridge/purl.cover.jsp?purl=/1019180...

    1989

  12. [12]

    Scarani, W.Tittel, H

    V. Scarani, W.Tittel, H. Zbinden, N. Gisin,The speed of quantum information and the preferred frame: analysis of experimental data, Phys. Lett.A276, 1 (2000)

    2000

  13. [13]

    Salart, A

    D. Salart, A. Baas, C. Branciard, N. Gisin, and H. Zbinden,Testing the speed of ‘spooky action at a dis- tance’, Nature454, 861 (2008)

    2008

  14. [14]

    Lett.A375, 379 (2011)

    B.Cocciaro, S.Faetti, andL.Fronzoni,A lower bound for the velocity of quantum communications in the preferred frame, Phys. Lett.A375, 379 (2011)

    2011

  15. [15]

    spooky action at a distance

    L. Santamaria Amato, et al.,Testing the speed of “spooky action at a distance” in a tabletop experiment, Sci. Rep. 13, 8201 (2023)

    2023

  16. [16]

    D.Bohm, andB.J.Hiley,TheUndividedUniverse, Chap- ter 12, (Routledge, London, 1993)

    1993

  17. [17]

    Bancal, S

    J-D. Bancal, S. Pironio, A. Acin, Y-C. Liang, V. Scarani, and N. Gisin,Quantum non-locality based on finite-speed causal influences leads to superluminal signalling, Nature Physics8, 867 (2012)

    2012

  18. [18]

    Casetti, C

    L. Casetti, C. Clementi and M. Pettini,Riemannian the- ory of Hamiltonian chaos and Lyapunov exponents, Phys. Rev. E54, 5969 (1996)

    1996

  19. [19]

    Franzosi, and M

    R. Franzosi, and M. Pettini,Theorem on the origin of Phase Transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 060601 (2004)

    2004

  20. [20]

    Pettini,Geometry and Topology in Hamiltonian Dy- namics and Statistical Mechanics, (Springer, New York 2007)

    M. Pettini,Geometry and Topology in Hamiltonian Dy- namics and Statistical Mechanics, (Springer, New York 2007)

    2007

  21. [21]

    D.J. Bohm, J. Bub,A Proposed Solution of the Mea- surement Problem in Quantum Mechanics by a Hidden Variable Theory, Rev. Mod. Phys.38, 453 (1966)

    1966

  22. [22]

    Quantum Grav.14, L69 (1997)

    M.Tegmark,On the dimensionality of spacetime, Class. Quantum Grav.14, L69 (1997)

    1997

  23. [23]

    Bars,Survey of Two-Time Physics, Class

    I. Bars,Survey of Two-Time Physics, Class. Quantum Grav.18, 3113 (2001)

    2001

  24. [24]

    Craig and S

    W. Craig and S. Weinstein,On determinism and well- posedness in multiple time dimensions, Proc. Roy. Soc. A465, 3023 (2009)

    2009

  25. [25]

    Multiple Time Dimensions

    S. Weinstein,Multiple time dimensions, arXiv:0812.3869v1 [physics.gen-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  26. [26]

    C. Bär, N. Ginoux, and F. Pfäffle,Wave Equations on Lorentzian Manifolds and Quantization, ESI Lectures in Mathematics and Physics, (EMS Publishing House, 35 2007)

    2007

  27. [27]

    Rubakov and M.E

    V.A. Rubakov and M.E. Shaposhnikov,Do we live inside a domain wall?, Phys. Lett.B125, 136 (1983)

    1983

  28. [28]

    Visser,An Exotic Class of Kaluza-Klein Models, Phys

    M. Visser,An Exotic Class of Kaluza-Klein Models, Phys. Lett.B159, 22 (1985)

    1985

  29. [29]

    T. G. Rizzo,Pedagogical Introduction to Extra Di- mensions, SLAC Summer Institute, SLAC-PUB-10753 (2004); arXiv:hep-ph/0409309v2

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  30. [30]

    Genovese,Can quantum non-locality be connected to extra-dimensions?, Int

    M. Genovese,Can quantum non-locality be connected to extra-dimensions?, Int. J. of Quantum Information, 2340003 (2023)

    2023

  31. [31]

    D. C. Brody and E.-M. Graefe,Six-dimensional space- time from quaternionic quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. D84, 125016 (2011)

    2011

  32. [32]

    Furquan, T

    M. Furquan, T. P. Singh, and P. S. Wesley,Time-like ex- tra dimensions: quantum nonlocality, spin, and Tsirelson bound, Universe11, 137 (2025)

    2025

  33. [33]

    Randall and R

    L. Randall and R. Sundrum,Large Mass Hierarchy from a Small Extra Dimension, Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 3370 (1999)

    1999

  34. [34]

    Randall and R

    L. Randall and R. Sundrum,An Alternative to Compact- ification, Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 4690 (1999)

    1999

  35. [35]

    do Carmo,Rieman- nian Geometry, (Birkhäuser, Boston, 1992)

    Hereafter for all the basic concepts and definitions of Rie- mannian Geometry refer to : M.P. do Carmo,Rieman- nian Geometry, (Birkhäuser, Boston, 1992)

    1992

  36. [36]

    Israel,Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in gen- eral relativity, Nuovo Cimento B44, 2 (1966); erratum 48463 (1967)

    W. Israel,Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in gen- eral relativity, Nuovo Cimento B44, 2 (1966); erratum 48463 (1967)

    1966

  37. [37]

    Courant, D

    R. Courant, D. Hilbert,Methods of Mathematical Physics, Volume 1, (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1989)

    1989

  38. [38]

    M. Reed, B. Simon,Methods of Modern Mathemat- ical Physics, Vol. I: Functional Analysis, (Academic Press, New York, 1972);Methods of Modern Mathemat- ical Physics, Vol. II: Fourier Analysis, Self-Adjointness, (Academic Press, New York, 1975)

    1972

  39. [39]

    Jackson,Classical Electrodynamics, (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1998), Chapt

    J.D. Jackson,Classical Electrodynamics, (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1998), Chapt. 6

    1998

  40. [40]

    Garriga and T

    J. Garriga and T. Tanaka,Gravity in the Randall– Sundrum brane world, Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 2778 (2000)

    2000

  41. [41]

    [38] Chapt

    See Ref. [38] Chapt. 12

  42. [42]

    Dereziński and and C

    J. Dereziński and and C. Gaß,Propagators in Curved Spacetimes from Operator Theory, Annales Henri Poincaré (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00023- 025-01647-y

    work page doi:10.1007/s00023- 2025

  43. [43]

    SeeEq.C8in: M.Fukuma, S.Sugishita, andY.Sakatani, Propagators in de Sitter space, Phys. Rev. D88, 024041 (2013)

    2013

  44. [44]

    Abramowitz and I

    M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun,Handbook of Mathe- matical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathe- matical Tables, (Dover Publications, New York, 1972)

    1972

  45. [45]

    M. E. Taylor,Partial Differential Equations I: Qualita- tive Studies of Linear Equations(Springer, New York, 1996), Chapt. 6, Eqs. (6.5) – (6.7)

    1996

  46. [46]

    Toscano, R.O

    F. Toscano, R.O. Vallejos, and D. Wisniacki,Semiclas- sical description of wave packet revival, Phys. Rev. E80, 046218 (2009)

    2009

  47. [47]

    M. C. Gutzwiller,Chaos in Classical and Quantum Me- chanics, (Springer, New York, 1990), Chap. 12

    1990

  48. [48]

    Tutsch,Mathematics of the Measurement Problem in Quantum Mechanics, J

    J.H. Tutsch,Mathematics of the Measurement Problem in Quantum Mechanics, J. Math. Phys.12, 1711 (1971)

    1971

  49. [49]

    Bassi, K

    A. Bassi, K. Lochan, S. Satin, T. P. Singh, and H. Ul- bricht,Models of wave-function collapse, underlying the- ories, and experimental tests, Rev. Mod. Phys.85, 471 (2013)

    2013

  50. [50]

    Genovese,Research on hidden variable theories: A review of recent progresses, Phys

    M. Genovese,Research on hidden variable theories: A review of recent progresses, Phys. Rep.413, 319 (2005)

    2005

  51. [51]

    D. C. Brody and L. P. Hughston,Lévy models for col- lapse of the wave function, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.56, 125303 (2023)

    2023

  52. [52]

    M. A. Nielsen,Quantum information theory, PhD Dissertation, The University of New Mexico (1998); arXiv:quant-ph/0011036

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  53. [53]

    Kochen and E.P

    S. Kochen and E.P. Specker,The problem of hidden vari- ables in quantum mechanics, J. of Mathematics and Me- chanics17, 59 (1967)

    1967

  54. [54]

    Valentini,Signal-locality, uncertainty, and the sub- quantumH-theorem, Phys

    A. Valentini,Signal-locality, uncertainty, and the sub- quantumH-theorem, Phys. Lett. A156, 5 (1991)

    1991

  55. [55]

    A.Valentini, andH.Westman,Dynamical origin of quan- tum probabilities, Proc. R. Soc. A461, 253 (2005)

    2005

  56. [56]

    J. S. Bell,On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox, Physics1, 195 (1964)

    1964

  57. [57]

    J. F. Clauser, M. A. Horne, A. Shimony, and R. A. Holt, Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theo- ries, Phys. Rev. Lett.23, 880 (1969)

    1969

  58. [58]

    B. S. Tsirelson,Quantum generalizations of Bell’s in- equality, Lett. Math. Phys.4, 93 (1980)

    1980

  59. [59]

    S. L. Adler,Lower and upper bounds on CSL parameters from latent image formation and IGM heating, J. Phys. A40, 2935 (2007)

    2007

  60. [60]

    D. Dürr, S. Goldstein, and N. Zanghì,Quantum equi- librium and the origin of absolute uncertainty, J. Stat. Phys.67, 843 (1992)

    1992

  61. [61]

    R. M. Wald,General Relativity, (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1984)

    1984

  62. [62]

    Barrabès and W

    C. Barrabès and W. Israel,Thin shells in general relativ- ity and cosmology: The lightlike limit, Phys. Rev. D43, 1129 (1991)

    1991

  63. [63]

    Shiromizu, K.-i

    T. Shiromizu, K.-i. Maeda, and M. Sasaki,The Einstein equations on the 3-brane world, Phys. Rev. D62, 024012 (2000)

    2000

  64. [64]

    Relativ.13, 5 (2010)

    R.MaartensandK.Koyama,Brane-world gravity, Living Rev. Relativ.13, 5 (2010)

    2010

  65. [65]

    Yu. V. Shtanov and V. Sahni,Bouncing brane worlds, Phys. Lett. B557, 1 (2003)

    2003

  66. [66]

    Risken,The Fokker–Planck Equation: Methods of So- lution and Applications, (Springer, Berlin, 1989)

    H. Risken,The Fokker–Planck Equation: Methods of So- lution and Applications, (Springer, Berlin, 1989)

    1989