Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 37 references

Advanced Printed Sensors for Environmental Applications: A Path Towards Sustainable Monitoring Solutions

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This review argues that printed sensors, made by depositing functional inks on flexible substrates, are a cost-effective and sustainable alternative to silicon-based sensors for environmental monitoring, with high sensitivity and accuracy…

desk verdict A well-structured but derivative review that overclaims printed sensor performance; the abstract contradicts its own limitations section. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.02067 v1 pith:U6EMLHDN submitted 2025-07-02 cs.AR

Nikolaos Papanikolaou , Doha Touhafi , Jurgen Vandendriessche , Danial Karimi , Sohail Fatimi , Gianluca Cornetta , Abdellah Touhafi This is my paper
classification cs.AR
keywords printedsensorsenvironmentalmonitoringflexibleelectronicssustainabletechnologysensorfabricationinkjetprintingscreenIoTintegration
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper is a review that advances a single thesis: printed sensors are ready to become the workhorse of environmental monitoring because they are cheap to manufacture, flexible in form, and printable at scale. The authors argue that these sensors already demonstrate high sensitivity and accuracy in detecting pollutants, temperature, humidity, and soil and water conditions, while their production uses less energy and generates less waste than conventional silicon fabrication. If the thesis holds, printed sensors open the door to dense, real-time monitoring networks in places where traditional sensors are too costly or impractical. The review's evidence, however, is assembled from existing publications and vendor sources rather than from new measurements.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the printing-based fabrication process itself: functional inks are deposited onto flexible substrates (PET, polyimide, paper) by inkjet, screen, 3D, flexographic, or gravure printing, each with its own trade-off between resolution, speed, and cost. This mechanism is what supposedly delivers low cost, scalability, flexibility, and low-waste production, and it is also the source of the technology's current weaknesses—ink formulation, resolution limits, material stability, and lack of standardization.

What would settle it

A controlled comparison that measures the manufacturing cost per unit and energy consumption per unit for a printed sensor and an equivalent silicon sensor, together with side-by-side sensitivity and drift tests under identical conditions, would settle whether the cost and performance claims are true.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that the convergence of printable materials (polymers, metals, ceramics, nanomaterials) and printing techniques (inkjet, screen, 3D, flexographic, gravure) has moved printed sensors to the point where they can challenge silicon on cost, versatility, and sustainability while matching it on sensitivity and accuracy for environmental applications. The authors treat this as an established trajectory, not a prediction: they assert printed sensors are 'considerably cheaper' to manufacture, more energy-efficient to produce, and capable of rapid prototyping and mass production, making them a 'transformative' route to sustainable monitoring.

Load-bearing premise

The review's core selling points—that printed sensors are considerably cheaper, more energy-efficient to make, and as accurate as silicon sensors—rest on qualitative statements in the cited sources rather than on measured data in this paper, so if any of those sources are inaccurate, the main argument collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Dense, low-cost sensor networks for air quality, water quality, and soil monitoring could become practical in urban and remote settings.
  • Real-time environmental data would flow into IoT platforms, enabling earlier warnings for pollution events and natural disasters.
  • Agricultural management could shift toward precision irrigation and fertilizer use based on printed soil sensors.
  • Production of monitoring hardware could become more sustainable, with less waste and lower energy use than silicon fabrication.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The review's cost and energy claims are asserted rather than demonstrated; a life-cycle comparison against silicon sensors would be needed to know whether the sustainability advantage survives real-world use and disposal.
  • The claimed 'high sensitivity and accuracy' is not backed by head-to-head benchmark data in this paper; standardized test protocols would convert this from a promise into a verifiable property.
  • Because many cited sources are vendor or promotional pages, the strength of the case currently rests on the reliability of those sources; a systematic literature search would test whether the claims are representative.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a review-style paper that surveys printed sensor technologies for environmental monitoring. It covers materials (polymers, metals, ceramics, nanomaterials), fabrication methods (inkjet, screen, 3D, flexographic, gravure printing), applications (air and water quality, soil, temperature/humidity, disaster warning), a comparison with silicon-based sensors, and a section on challenges and limitations. The paper's central claim, stated in the abstract and repeated in Section IV, is that printed sensors are a transformative, cost-effective, and sustainable alternative to silicon sensors that 'demonstrate high sensitivity and accuracy' and offer cheaper, more energy-efficient production.

Significance. If the central claims were substantiated, the paper could serve as a useful orientation review for researchers and practitioners considering printed sensors for environmental monitoring. The topic is timely and relevant, and the paper collects a broad set of application areas and references. However, the manuscript does not provide any measured performance data, comparative cost figures, or lifecycle analyses, and it relies heavily on vendor and promotional sources. The abstract's strong positive claims are also in direct tension with the paper's own Section V, which concedes that current printed sensors may not meet stringent accuracy standards and face significant reliability and durability problems. As written, the paper functions more as a promotional overview than a critical, evidence-based review, and its key selling points remain assertions rather than established findings.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Section V] The abstract states that printed sensors 'demonstrate high sensitivity and accuracy in detecting pollutants, temperature variations, humidity levels, and other critical parameters,' and Section IV repeats that they offer reliable, cost-effective, and scalable advantages. However, Section V explicitly concedes that 'in applications that require high accuracy, such as medical applications or precise environmental monitoring, the current generation of printed sensors may not meet the stringent standards required' and that reliability and durability remain significant challenges. This internal contradiction leaves the paper's central claim unsupported. The authors must either provide evidence that current printed sensors meet the accuracy and reliability standards claimed in the abstract, or substantially temper the abstract and Section IV to align with the limitations acknowledged in Section V.
  2. [Section IV] The claim that printed sensors are 'considerably cheaper' to manufacture and that their production is 'more energy efficient' than silicon-based sensors is made without any quantitative comparison. No cost per sensor, energy per device, yield, or lifecycle data are provided. The citations supporting these claims ([19], [26], [27], [28], [31]) are vendor blogs, trade magazine articles, and promotional pages rather than peer-reviewed lifecycle assessments or comparative studies. The authors should either supply measured data from controlled comparisons or explicitly present these as potential advantages that require validation, not as established facts.
  3. [Section III] Section III states that printed sensors 'contribute significantly to disaster warning systems' and can detect early signs of earthquakes and tsunamis, enabling timely evacuations. No field study or deployment evidence is cited for this specific application. The supporting references are [7], a general review of 3D-printed sensors, and [25], an IoT early-warning review that does not focus on printed sensors. This appears to be a speculative extrapolation rather than a demonstrated application. The authors should remove this claim or support it with specific studies showing printed sensors used in seismic or tsunami detection.
  4. [General (all sections)] The paper is presented as a review but does not describe any systematic review methodology, such as search strategy, inclusion/exclusion criteria, or quality appraisal of sources. The reference list includes a substantial number of non-archival, promotional web sources (for example, [19], [26], [27], [28], [31], [36]) alongside peer-reviewed literature, without distinguishing the evidentiary weight of these sources. For a review article, this makes it impossible for the reader to separate established scientific findings from vendor marketing claims. The authors should either add a methodology section with a clear source-selection process, or explicitly reposition the paper as a perspectives/narrative review and qualify claims accordingly.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section IV] The sentence 'Printed sensor have a more energy efficient production process which also improves their environmental impact' contains a grammatical error; it should read 'Printed sensors have a more energy-efficient production process.'
  2. [Section II] The caption 'Fig. 2. Printed Sensors Technologies.' is grammatically awkward; consider 'Printing technologies for printed sensors.'
  3. [References] Reference formatting is inconsistent: some entries include odd page numbers or fragments (e.g., [6], [13], [14]), and several web references lack proper access dates or have malformed URLs. The reference list should be cleaned up to match the journal's style.
  4. [Section III, Fig. 7] Figure 7, captioned 'Sensors in disaster warning systems,' appears to be taken from an IoT review [25] that may not specifically depict printed sensors. Please clarify whether the figure illustrates printed sensors or generic sensor systems, and ensure the caption and the text accurately represent what the figure shows.
  5. [Section VI] The conclusion states that printed sensors 'can deliver real-time, accurate data crucial for effective environmental monitoring,' which repeats the strong claim from the abstract without acknowledging the qualifications in Section V. The conclusion should be made consistent with the limitations discussed earlier in the paper.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: this is a narrative review with no derivation, fitting, or self-cited load-bearing result, so the high-accuracy and low-cost claims are unsupported assertions rather than circular ones.

full rationale

The paper is a review article that surveys printed sensor technologies, applications, comparisons, and challenges. It contains no equations, no fitted parameters, no predictive model, and no derivation chain in which an output is constructed from an input. The central claims—such as printed sensors being 'cost-effective', 'energy efficient', and demonstrating 'high sensitivity and accuracy'—are asserted qualitatively and attributed to external references, but none of these assertions is derived from, or definitionally equivalent to, another claim in the paper. There is also no load-bearing self-citation: the authors' own prior work is not invoked to justify any technical premise, and the cited sources are external reviews, vendor articles, and institutional pages. Section V explicitly contradicts the abstract's optimistic claims by stating that 'the current generation of printed sensors may not meet the stringent standards required' for high-accuracy applications. This internal tension is a soundness and evidence-quality concern, not a circularity concern. Therefore, the appropriate circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper makes no mathematical derivation and fits no parameters, and it introduces no new theoretical entities. Its only 'axioms' are broad domain claims about sensor performance, which are unsupported assertions rather than formal assumptions. Therefore all three ledgers are empty.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Advanced Printed Sensors for Environmental Applications: A Path Towards Sustainable Monitoring Solutions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/U6EMLHDN

@misc{pith2026250702067,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Advanced Printed Sensors for Environmental Applications: A Path Towards Sustainable Monitoring Solutions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/U6EMLHDN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.02067}
}
read the original abstract

Printed sensors represent a transformative advancement in sensor technology, utilizing innovative printing techniques to create flexible, cost-effective, and highly customizable sensing devices. Their versatility allows integration into numerous applications across diverse fields such as monitoring a wide range of environmental factors e.g. air and water quality, soil conditions, and atmospheric changes among others. These sensors demonstrate high sensitivity and accuracy in detecting pollutants, temperature variations, humidity levels, and other critical parameters essential for environmental assessment and protection.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.02067 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Evolution of sensor array timeline (1962-present)[6]. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Printed Sensors in Soil Applications [23]. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Printed Humidity Sensor [24]. Beyond these applications, printed sensors contribute signif￾icantly to disaster warning systems, as depicted in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_6.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Printed sensor in agriculture applications [22]. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Sensors in disaster warning systems [25]. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_7.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Printed Sensors in environmental application [36]. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_9.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages

  1. [19]

    Environmental monitoring: printing sensors and dis- plays

    Printing Tips. “Environmental monitoring: printing sensors and dis- plays.” Available from: https://printingtips.ca/environmental-monitoring- printing-sensors-and-displays/. [Accessed 18 October 2024]

    work page 2024

  2. [26]

    Flexing innovation with printed sensors: modern electronics

    Electronics For You, “Flexing innovation with printed sensors: modern electronics.” Available from: https://www.electronicsforu.com/tech -zone/flexing-innovation-with-printed-sensors-modern-electronics. [Accessed 18 October 2024]

    work page 2024

  3. [27]

    Benefits and uses of flexible printed sensors

    Tapecon, “Benefits and uses of flexible printed sensors.” Available from: https://www.tapecon.com/blog/benefits-and-uses-of-flexible-printed-s ensors. [Accessed 18 October 2024]

    work page 2024

  4. [28]

    Advantages and disadvantages of flexible printed sensors

    RF Wireless World, “Advantages and disadvantages of flexible printed sensors.” Available from: https://www.rfwireless-world.com/Termino logy/Advantages-and-Disadvantages-of-flexible-printed-sensors.html. [Accessed 18 October 2024]

    work page 2024

  5. [31]

    The role of printed sensors in environmental monitoring

    AZoSensors, “The role of printed sensors in environmental monitoring.” Available from: https://www.azosensors.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=30

    work page

  6. [7]

    Current Progress in 3D-Printed Sensors: Design, Application, and Future Challenges

    Yaakoubi I, Mejri A, Elfil H, Mars A. Current Progress in 3D-Printed Sensors: Design, Application, and Future Challenges. 1st ed. Cham: Springer; 2024, pp. 1-32. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-16338-8 65-1

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-031-16338-8 2024

  7. [25]

    Ad- vances in Internet of Things Solutions for Early Warning Systems: A Review

    Esposito M, Palma L, Belli A, Sabbatini L, Pierleoni P. Recent “Ad- vances in Internet of Things Solutions for Early Warning Systems: A Review.” 1st ed. Ancona, Italy: Universit `a Politecnica delle Marche; 2022, pp. 1-30. doi:10.3390/s22062124

    work page doi:10.3390/s22062124 2022

  8. [36]

    Flexible Printed Electronics and Their Applications in Food Quality Monitoring and Intelligent Food Packaging: Recent Advances

    Sharmila R, Patankar NS, Prabakaran M, Akana CMVS, Shukla AK, Raja T. “Flexible Printed Electronics and Their Applications in Food Quality Monitoring and Intelligent Food Packaging: Recent Advances.” 1st ed. Coimbatore, India: Karpagam Academy of Higher Education; 2023, pp. 30-50. doi:10.3390/app11083532

    work page doi:10.3390/app11083532 2023

Show all 37 references
  1. [1]

    Innovative Technologies For Wa- ter Conservation And Management

    Guest Column, “Innovative Technologies For Wa- ter Conservation And Management”, Available from: https://www.wateronline.com/doc/innovative-technologies-for-water- conservation-and-management-0001 [Accessed 17 September 2024]

    2024

  2. [2]

    How digital technology and innovation can help protect the planet

    United Nations Environment Programme. How digital technology and innovation can help protect the planet. Available from: https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/story/how-digital-technology- and-innovation-can-help-protect-planet. [Accessed 18 October 2024]

    2024

  3. [3]

    8 ways sensor technology has addressed environmental problems

    Environmental Defense Fund. “8 ways sensor technology has addressed environmental problems.” Available from: https://www.edf.org/8-ways- sensor-technology-addressed-environmental-problems. [Accessed 18 October 2024]

    2024

  4. [4]

    Printed Flexible Sensors: Fabri- cation, Characterization and Implementation

    Nag A, Mukhopadhyay SC, Kosel J., “Printed Flexible Sensors: Fabri- cation, Characterization and Implementation.” 1st ed. Cham: Springer; 2019, pp. 1-198. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-13765-61

    2019 doi

  5. [5]

    Single-Crystal Silicon: Growth and Properties

    Shimura F. Single-Crystal Silicon: Growth and Properties. 1st ed. New York: Springer; 1989, pp. 1-268 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-48933-9 13

    1989 doi

  6. [6]

    Chemiresistive Sensor Arrays for Gas/V olatile Organic Compounds Monitoring: A Review

    Rath RJ, Farajikhah S, Oveissi F, Dehghani F, Naficy S. “Chemiresistive Sensor Arrays for Gas/V olatile Organic Compounds Monitoring: A Review.” 1st ed. Sydney, Australia: The University of Sydney; 2022, pp. 830-850. doi:10.1002/adem.202200830

    2022 doi

  7. [8]

    Recent Advances in 3D Printed Sensors: Materials, Design, and Manufacturing

    Jiang Y , Islam MN, Dong P, He R, Huang X, Cao P-F, Advincula RC, Dahotre N, Wu HF, Choi W. “Recent Advances in 3D Printed Sensors: Materials, Design, and Manufacturing.” 1st ed. Denton, TX: University of North Texas; 2022, pp. 1-32. doi:10.2172/1909124

    2022 doi

  8. [9]

    How sensor technology is helping to tackle environmental challenges

    AZoSensors, “How sensor technology is helping to tackle environmental challenges.” Available from: https://www.azosensors.com/article.aspx? ArticleID=3037. [Accessed 18 October 2024]

    2024

  9. [10]

    Additive Manu- facturing of Sensors: A Comprehensive Review

    Hossain MJ, Tavousi Tabatabaei B, Kiki M, Choi JW. “Additive Manu- facturing of Sensors: A Comprehensive Review.” 1st ed. Cham: Springer; 2024, pp. 1-45. DOI: 10.1007/s40684-024-00629-5

    2024 doi

  10. [11]

    3D Printed Integrated Sensors: From Fabrica- tion to Applications

    Hassan MS, Zaman S, Dantzler JZR, Leyva DH, Mahmud MS, Ramirez JM, Gomez SG, Lin Y . “3D Printed Integrated Sensors: From Fabrica- tion to Applications.” 1st ed. Basel: MDPI; 2023, pp. 1-3148. DOI: 10.3390/nano13243148

    2023 doi

  11. [12]

    Printable Smart Materials and Devices: Strategies and Applications

    Su M, Song Y . “Printable Smart Materials and Devices: Strategies and Applications.” 1st ed. Beijing, China: Chinese Academy of Sciences; 2021, pp. 5144-5164. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00303

    2021 doi

  12. [13]

    Advances in Printing and Electronics: From Engagement to Commitment

    Martins P, Pereira N, Lima AC, Garcia A, Mendes-Filipe C, Policia R, Correia V , Lanceros-Mendez S. “Advances in Printing and Electronics: From Engagement to Commitment.” 1st ed. Braga, Portugal: Universi- dade do Minho; 2023, pp. 2213744-2213744. doi: 10.1002/adfm.20221 3744

    2023 doi

  13. [14]

    Flexible and Printable Sensors

    Bessonov AA, Kirikova MN. “Flexible and Printable Sensors.” 1st ed. Moscow, Russia: Nokia Labs Skolkovo; 2015, pp. 165-180. doi: 10.113 4/S1995078015020044

    2015

  14. [15]

    Fabrication of Screen-Printed Elec- trodes: Opportunities and Challenges

    Suresh RR, Lakshmanakumar M, Jayalatha JBB, Rajan KS, Sethuraman S, Krishnan UM, Rayappan JBB. “Fabrication of Screen-Printed Elec- trodes: Opportunities and Challenges.” 1st ed. Cham: Springer; 2021, pp. 8951-9006. DOI: 10.1007/s10853-020-05499-1

    2021 doi

  15. [16]

    Recent Progress in Man- ufacturing Techniques of Printed and Flexible Sensors: A Review

    Maddipatla D, Narakathu BB, Atashbar M. “Recent Progress in Man- ufacturing Techniques of Printed and Flexible Sensors: A Review.” 1st ed. Basel: MDPI; 2020, pp. 1-199. DOI: 10.3390/bios10120199

    2020 doi

  16. [17]

    Review on Humidity, Temperature and Strain Printed Sensors—Current Trends and Future Perspectives

    Barmpakos D, Kaltsas G. A “Review on Humidity, Temperature and Strain Printed Sensors—Current Trends and Future Perspectives.” 1st ed. Athens, Greece: University of West Attica; 2021, pp. 739-760. doi:10.3390/s21030739

    2021 doi

  17. [18]

    Printable Electrochemical Biosensors: A Focus on Screen-Printed Electrodes and Their Applica- tion

    Yamanaka K, Vestergaard MC, Tamiya E. “Printable Electrochemical Biosensors: A Focus on Screen-Printed Electrodes and Their Applica- tion.” 1st ed. Osaka, Japan: Osaka University; 2016, pp. 1761-1780. doi:10.3390/s16101761

    2016 doi

  18. [20]

    Review of Chemical Engineering: V olume 38, Issue 1

    De Gruyter “Review of Chemical Engineering: V olume 38, Issue 1.” Available from: https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/rev ce-2022-0002/html. [Accessed 18 October 2024]

    2022 doi

  19. [21]

    Electrochemical and Optical Sensors for Real-Time Detection of Nitrate in Water

    Lal K, Jaywant SA, Arif KM. “Electrochemical and Optical Sensors for Real-Time Detection of Nitrate in Water.” 1st ed. Auckland, New Zealand: Massey University; 2023, pp. 7099-7100. doi: 10.3390/s23167 099

    2023 doi

  20. [22]

    A Strategy for the Acquisition and Analysis of Image-Based Phenome in Rice during the Whole Growth Period

    Tang, Z., Chen, Z., Gao, Y ., Xue, R., Geng, Z., Bu, Q., Wang, Y ., Chen, X., Jiang, Y ., Chen, F., et al., “A Strategy for the Acquisition and Analysis of Image-Based Phenome in Rice during the Whole Growth Period.” Plant Phenomics, 2023. Available from: https://spj.science.o...

    2023 doi

  21. [23]

    Printed sensors in soil could help farmers improve crop yields and save money

    University of Wisconsin-Madison “Printed sensors in soil could help farmers improve crop yields and save money” Available from: https: //news.wisc.edu/printed-sensors-in-soil-could-help-farmers-improve-c rop-yields-and-save-money/. [Accessed 18 October 2024]

    2024

  22. [24]

    Product updates: sustainable ink technology for printing flex- ible sensors

    Saralon, “Product updates: sustainable ink technology for printing flex- ible sensors.” Available from: https://www.saralon.com/en/blog/produc t-updates-sustainable-ink-technology-for-printing-flexible-sensors/. [Accessed 18 October 2024]

    2024

  23. [29]

    Aerosol-Jet Printed Sensors for Environmental, Safety, and Health Monitoring: A Review

    Fisher CT, Skolrood LN, Li K, Joshi PC, Aytug T. “Aerosol-Jet Printed Sensors for Environmental, Safety, and Health Monitoring: A Review.” 1st ed. Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory; 2023, pp. 2300030-2300030. doi:10.1002/admt.202300030

    2023 doi

  24. [30]

    Printable and Flexible Integrated Sensing Systems for Wireless Healthcare

    Zhou K, Ding R, Ma X, Lin Y . “Printable and Flexible Integrated Sensing Systems for Wireless Healthcare.” 1st ed. Shenzhen, China: Southern University of Science and Technology; 2024, pp. 7264-7286. doi:10.1039/D3NR06099C

    2024 doi

  25. [32]

    [Accessed 18 October 2024]

    2024

  26. [33]

    Embedded Sensors with 3D Printing Technology: Review

    Bas J, Dutta T, Llamas Garro I, Vel ´azquez-Gonz´alez JS, Dubey R, Mishra SK. “Embedded Sensors with 3D Printing Technology: Review.” 1st ed. Castelldefels, Spain: Center Technologic de Telecomunicacions de Catalunya; 2024, pp. 1955-1978. doi:10.3390/s24061955

    2024 doi

  27. [34]

    Prac- tical Evaluation of Printed Strain Sensors Based on Long-Term Static Strain Measurements

    Zymelka D, Togashi K, Takeshita T, Yamashita T, Kobayashi T. “Prac- tical Evaluation of Printed Strain Sensors Based on Long-Term Static Strain Measurements.” 1st ed. Tsukuba, Japan: National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology; 2021, pp. 4812-4830. doi:10....

    2021 doi

  28. [35]

    Printability of the Screen-Printed Strain Sensor with Carbon Black/Silver Paste for Sensitive Wearable Electronics

    Qi X, Ha H, Hwang B, Lim S. “Printability of the Screen-Printed Strain Sensor with Carbon Black/Silver Paste for Sensitive Wearable Electronics.” 1st ed. Jeonju, Korea: Jeonbuk National University; 2020, pp. 6983-7001. doi:10.3390/app10196983

    2020 doi

  29. [37]

    Printed sensors for environmental monitor- ing in apple orchards

    Laimburg Research Centre, “Printed sensors for environmental monitor- ing in apple orchards.” Available from: https://lido.laimburg.it/en/printe d-sensors-for-environmental-monitoring-in-apple-orchards/. [Accessed 23 October 2024]

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.