Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

CrowdGenUI: Aligning LLM-Based UI Generation with Crowdsourced User Preferences

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.03477 v2 pith:U6GPLRI4 submitted 2024-11-05 cs.HC

classification cs.HC
keywords usergenerationpreferencesframeworkllm-basedllmscrowdgenuicrowdsourced
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable potential across various design domains, including user interface (UI) generation. However, current LLMs for UI generation tend to offer generic solutions that lack a nuanced understanding of task context and user preferences. We present CrowdGenUI, a framework that enhances LLM-based UI generation with crowdsourced user preferences. This framework addresses the limitations by guiding LLM reasoning with real user preferences, enabling the generation of UI widgets that reflect user needs and task-specific requirements. We evaluate our framework in the image editing domain by collecting a library of 720 user preferences from 50 participants, covering preferences such as predictability, efficiency, and explorability of various UI widgets. A user study (N=78) demonstrates that UIs generated with our preference-guided framework can better match user intentions compared to those generated by LLMs alone, highlighting the effectiveness of our proposed framework. We further discuss the study findings and present insights for future research on LLM-based user-centered UI generation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Non-programmers Assessing AI-Generated Code: A Case Study of Business Users Analyzing Data

    cs.HC 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Non-programmer business users often fail to spot critical mistakes in AI-generated data analyses, even when explicitly warned and incentivized.

  2. Designing Scaffolded Interfaces for Enhanced Learning and Performance in Professional Software

    cs.HC 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ScaffoldUI's task-aware Blender panels reduced beginners' perceived workload and improved self-reported task performance and learning in a 40-person user study.

Pith tools