Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

KAN-LSTM-Transformer Neural Networks, MFV and Cosmological Parameters

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-07-10 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A hybrid neural network reconstructs the supernova distance ladder without a cosmological model and pins H0 near 69.6 km/s/Mpc.

desk verdict Competent hybrid-network extension of LADDER that delivers a usable μ(z) reconstruction and consistent H0 inside flat ΛCDM, but the superiority claim rests on non-significant MSE differences and unlinked stability. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.06959 v1 pith:U6WOII63 submitted 2026-07-08 astro-ph.CO

Jiang Zhang , Yan-dong Chen This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.CO
keywords cosmicdistanceladderTypeIasupernovaeKolmogorov-ArnoldnetworksLSTMTransformerHubbleconstantMostFrequentValueflatΛCDM
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that a hybrid network called KLT-Net, which stacks Kolmogorov–Arnold layers, LSTM memory cells and a Transformer encoder, can reconstruct the distance modulus of Type Ia supernovae directly from the Pantheon catalogue without assuming any cosmological model. Once that reconstruction is in hand, the authors combine it with a Most-Frequent-Value estimate of the absolute magnitude and standard Bayesian fitting inside flat ΛCDM to obtain a tightly constrained Hubble constant. They claim the hybrid architecture is the most accurate and the most stable of the machine-learning and classical regression models they tested, and that the three independent statistical routes (χ², MCMC and Hessian) all agree. A sympathetic reader cares because a stable, model-independent distance ladder is a practical tool for the next generation of large supernova surveys and for any later exploration of dark-energy or modified-gravity models.

What carries the argument

KLT-Net: a three-stage hybrid that first lets LSTM capture local redshift-sequence correlations (including covariance), then lets KAN layers replace linear weights by learnable splines for compact non-linear feature transformation, and finally lets a Transformer self-attention block extract global evolutionary patterns across the full redshift range.

What would settle it

Retrain the identical architecture and the LADDER baseline on the same Pantheon+ sample with a larger set of random seeds; if the resulting posterior distributions for H0 and Ωm differ by more than the quoted 1σ uncertainties, or if a paired test now finds a significant MSE gap, the claim that KLT-Net is the uniquely preferred reconstructor collapses.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

KLT-Net produces the lowest mean-squared error (0.015727) and the lowest cross-seed coefficient of variation among all architectures examined, and the resulting non-parametric distance modulus, together with an MFV absolute magnitude of –19.377, yields H0 = 69.576^{+0.483}_{-0.482} km s^{-1} Mpc^{-1} and Ωm0 = 0.301^{+0.039}_{-0.036} inside flat ΛCDM, with χ², MCMC and Hessian analyses mutually consistent.

Load-bearing premise

That the hybrid network’s superior training stability across random seeds is enough reason to prefer it for cosmological inference even though formal statistical tests find no significant accuracy difference versus simpler alternatives.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A model-independent μ(z) ladder can be fed into any subsequent dark-energy or modified-gravity analysis without re-fitting the supernova photometry.
  • The same KLT architecture can be retrained on forthcoming LSST or Euclid supernova catalogues to test high-redshift extrapolation.
  • MFV plus bootstrap supplies a robust absolute-magnitude prior that can be reused in any other ladder-based H0 determination.
  • Hessian-matrix validation becomes a quick consistency check for any Bayesian cosmological pipeline that uses neural-network predictions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the reconstruction itself never assumes flat ΛCDM, the same μ(z) could later be used to test whether a late-time transition in absolute magnitude is required, an idea the paper only mentions in the introduction.
  • The stability argument may matter more for next-generation surveys that will have far denser high-redshift sampling, where small training fluctuations could otherwise bias dark-energy equation-of-state constraints.
  • If the Transformer’s global attention is the main source of stability, simpler attention-augmented LSTM models might achieve the same cosmological performance with fewer parameters.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes KLT-Net, a hybrid of Kolmogorov-Arnold networks, LSTM and Transformer layers, as a data-driven non-parametric reconstructor of the distance modulus μ(z) from Pantheon SN Ia apparent magnitudes (including covariance). After comparing against classical regressors (DTR, RF, SVM, KNN, MLP) and performing multi-seed ablations against LADDER and partial hybrids, the authors select KLT-Net on the basis of lowest MSE (0.015727) and lowest cross-seed coefficient of variation. Absolute magnitude MB is estimated via the Most Frequent Value (MFV) procedure applied to a literature compilation; the reconstructed μ(z) is then inserted into a flat-ΛCDM likelihood whose parameters H0 and Ωm0 are constrained by χ² minimization, emcee MCMC and Hessian-matrix error propagation, yielding mutually consistent values H0 ≈ 69.58 km s⁻¹ Mpc⁻¹ and Ωm0 ≈ 0.30.

Significance. If the hybrid architecture demonstrably improves the reliability of the reconstructed distance ladder for downstream cosmological inference, the work supplies a practical, covariance-aware alternative to Gaussian processes and pure LSTM (LADDER). Strengths that should be credited include the systematic ten-seed ablation study with both parametric and non-parametric significance tests, the explicit cross-validation of three independent inference engines (χ², MCMC, Hessian), and the transparent application of MFV plus bootstrap to the absolute-magnitude prior. These elements make the pipeline more reproducible than many black-box ML cosmology papers. The scientific advance remains incremental relative to Shah et al. (2024) and does not resolve the Hubble tension, but a well-validated hybrid reconstructor would still be a useful community tool for future large SN samples.

major comments (2)
  1. §3 (Ablation Study), Tables 2–3: every pairwise MSE comparison of KLT versus LADDER, LT, KT and KL returns p > 0.05 by both paired t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The accuracy advantage is therefore not statistically established. The manuscript elevates residual training stability (lowest CV = 3.45 %) as sufficient justification for feeding only the KLT reconstruction into the §4 cosmological pipeline. Without reporting the identical MFV-MB + flat-ΛCDM analysis driven by the LADDER (or ablated) reconstructions, it remains unproven that the lower CV tightens or de-biases the headline posteriors H0 = 69.576^{+0.483}_{-0.482}, Ωm0 = 0.301^{+0.039}_{-0.036}. This comparison is load-bearing for the claim that KLT-Net is the preferred architecture for cosmological parameter estimation.
  2. §4.2 and Eqs. (28)–(29): the likelihood is written as a simple diagonal χ² on μSN(zi) − μth(zi). The text repeatedly asserts that “full covariance information” of Pantheon+ is incorporated, yet the published Csys matrix never appears in the likelihood or in the network loss. Clarification is required whether the network was trained with a multivariate Gaussian loss that includes Csys, and whether the same matrix is used (or marginalized) when the reconstructed μ(z) is passed to the cosmological sampler. If the covariance is ignored at either stage, the reported 1σ uncertainties on H0 and Ωm0 are under-estimated.
minor comments (4)
  1. Figure 1 caption and §2.2.4: the conceptual diagram is described but the precise layer dimensions, spline order, number of Transformer heads and training hyper-parameters are never tabulated; a short architecture table would aid reproducibility.
  2. §4.1: the literature sample of MB values used for the MFV calculation is not listed; a supplementary table of the adopted references and their quoted MB would allow independent verification of the MFV and bootstrap intervals.
  3. Throughout: several typographical inconsistencies appear (e.g., “ΛCDM” vs “Λ CDM”, “Pantheon” vs “Pantheon+”, missing spaces before units). A careful copy-edit pass is needed.
  4. Eq. (2) and surrounding text: the conversion from m(z) to μ(z) assumes a constant MB; the later discussion of possible redshift evolution of MB is not propagated into the reconstruction uncertainty.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No load-bearing circularity: KLT-Net reconstruction of μ(z) is data-driven and model-independent; subsequent flat-ΛCDM inference of H0/Ωm and MFV MB are ordinary sequential steps, not reductions by construction.

  1. self citation load bearing [§4.1 (MFV for MB) and references [77,80,81,83]]
    "Using these previous results and the bootstrap method, the holistic estimate of MB for all data is -19.3772 and the dihesion ε=0.0291. ... Similar outcomes were observed in the literature cited, as noted by Mukherjee et al. [7]. This implies that error distributions are not Gaussian, thereby bolstering the credibility and rationality of the MFV estimate."

    The MFV procedure itself is Steiner’s (external); the authors cite their own prior applications of MFV to other astrophysical quantities. This is ordinary self-citation of method reuse, not a load-bearing uniqueness theorem that forces the present MB or H0 values. It does not make the cosmological-parameter result circular.

full rationale

The derivation chain is: (i) train KLT-Net (and ablations) on Pantheon apparent magnitudes + covariance to reconstruct μ(z) non-parametrically (lowest MSE 0.015727, lowest CV 3.45 % across seeds); (ii) obtain MB via MFV + bootstrap on a literature compilation; (iii) feed the reconstructed μ(z) into χ²/MCMC/Hessian under the flat-ΛCDM likelihood to obtain H0 ≈ 69.58 and Ωm0 ≈ 0.30. Step (i) does not embed ΛCDM or H0 (explicitly stated in §5); the network is validated against external baselines (LADDER, DTR, RF, etc.) and ablations with paired tests (Table 3, all p > 0.05). Step (ii) applies Steiner’s MFV (with self-citations only for prior applications of the same estimator, not for a uniqueness theorem that forces the result). Step (iii) is standard parametric inference after a non-parametric reconstruction; the paper itself flags the residual model dependence and does not claim a first-principles or model-free derivation of H0. No equation reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted input by construction, no self-citation supplies a load-bearing uniqueness claim, and no ansatz is smuggled. The preference for KLT on stability alone (despite non-significant MSE differences) is a methodological weakness, not circularity. Score 1 only for the minor, non-load-bearing self-citations of the authors’ earlier MFV applications.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central numerical claims rest on (i) the hybrid network’s ability to learn μ(z) from Pantheon under MSE, (ii) the MFV summary of heterogeneous literature M_B, and (iii) the flat-ΛCDM likelihood that converts μ(z) into H0 and Ωm. Free parameters include the fitted cosmological pair and the MFV M_B; axioms include FLRW geometry, Gaussian SN errors, and the Kolmogorov–Arnold representation used to motivate KAN layers. KLT-Net itself is the sole invented architectural entity.

free parameters (4)
  • H0 (flat ΛCDM) = 69.576^{+0.483}_{-0.482} km s⁻¹ Mpc⁻¹
    Fitted by χ² / MCMC / Hessian to the KLT-Net μ(z) curve; reported central value 69.576 km s⁻¹ Mpc⁻¹.
  • Ωm0 (flat ΛCDM) = 0.301^{+0.039}_{-0.036}
    Jointly fitted with H0 under the same likelihood; reported 0.301^{+0.039}_{-0.036}.
  • MB (MFV of literature) = -19.3772 (ε=0.0291; 68% CI [-19.389, -19.352])
    Most Frequent Value computed from published absolute-magnitude estimates; used as fixed calibration when converting m(z) to μ(z).
  • KLT-Net training hyperparameters
    Layer widths, spline order, learning rate, number of heads, dropout, etc., are chosen by the authors and control the reconstructed μ(z); exact values are not tabulated.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Spatially flat FLRW luminosity-distance integral (Eq. 1) relates H(z) to DL(z).
    Invoked throughout §2.1 and §4 to convert reconstructed μ into cosmological parameters.
  • domain assumption Flat ΛCDM expansion history H(z)=H0√[Ωm0(1+z)³+(1-Ωm0)] (Eq. 22).
    Assumed for all final H0/Ωm inference in §4.2; paper acknowledges this re-introduces model dependence.
  • domain assumption Gaussian likelihood for distance-modulus residuals (Eqs. 28–29).
    Standard SN Ia assumption used for χ², MCMC and Hessian.
  • standard math Kolmogorov–Arnold representation theorem justifies replacing MLP weights by univariate splines.
    Cited via Liu et al. to motivate the KAN module (§2.2.1).
  • ad hoc to paper Literature M_B estimates form a sample whose central tendency is best captured by MFV rather than mean/median.
    Justified by non-Gaussian residuals in Fig. 9; underpins the absolute-magnitude calibration.
invented entities (1)
  • KLT-Net (KAN-LSTM-Transformer hybrid)
    purpose: Non-parametric, covariance-aware reconstruction of μ(z) claimed to improve stability over pure LSTM (LADDER).
    Architectural invention of the paper; no independent external validation beyond the authors’ own ablations.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of KAN-LSTM-Transformer Neural Networks, MFV and Cosmological Parameters." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/U6WOII63

@misc{pith2026260706959,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: KAN-LSTM-Transformer Neural Networks, MFV and Cosmological Parameters},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/U6WOII63}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.06959}
}
abstract

Reconstructing the cosmic distance ladder directly from observations is a crucial issue in cosmology. In this paper, we present a novel method for modeling the cosmic distance ladder and estimating cosmological parameters through the use of Kolmogorov-Arnold networks (KAN), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and Transformer networks (collectively referred to as KLT-Net), based on the apparent magnitude data from the Pantheon SN Ia compilation. As a data-driven, non-parametric method for reconstructing the distance modulus $\mu(z)$, KLT-Net is shown to be highly effective in capturing the intricate, nonlinear measurement distributions. After validating against various statistical and machine learning models, we have identified it as the most effective choice among the considered alternatives and ablation experiments. Subsequently, the statistical inference of $H_0$ and $\Omega_{\rm m}$ adopts the flat $\Lambda$CDM framework. Moreover, we introduce the Most Frequent Value (MFV) approach to evaluate the absolute magnitude, $M_B$, from existing literature data. In addition, we employ the Hessian matrix to validate the Bayesian method, demonstrating that the Hubble constant can be precisely constrained from the KLT-Net predictions within the flat $\Lambda$CDM framework. The integration of KLT-Net, the MFV approach, and Bayesian statistics establishes a robust framework for inferring cosmological parameters. This methodology facilitates future cosmological research, particularly in the analysis of complex datasets and the exploration of high-dimensional parameter spaces.

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Profile-Likelihood and Baseline-Sensitivity Diagnostics for Digitized Radiation-Sensor Decay Datasets

    physics.data-an 2026-07 accept novelty 4.0 of 10

    A digitized 198Au decay curve reproduces the published half-life under a no-offset fit, but uniform baseline offsets of ±0.05 cps shift the fitted half-life by up to 0.054 d.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

107 extracted references · 107 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Cosmology with the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope: an Overview

    Zhan, H., Tyson, J.A.: Cosmology with the Large Synoptic Sur- vey Telescope: an overview. Reports on Progress in Physics81(6), 066901 (2018) https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.06948 [astro-ph.CO]. https: //doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/aab1bd

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aab1bd 2018

  2. [2]

    Role of Future SNIa Data from Rubin LSST in Reinvestigating Cosmological Models

    Shah, R., Mitra, A., Mukherjee, P., Pal, B., Pal, S.: Role of future SNIa data from Rubin LSST in reinvestigating cosmological models. MNRAS530(3), 2627–2636 (2024) https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.08786 [astro-ph.CO]. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae1016

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1016 2024

  3. [3]

    PRD111(4), 043503 (2025) https://arxiv.org/abs/2406

    Kumar, D., Mitra, A., Adil, S.A., Sen, A.A.: Exploring alternative cos- mologies with the LSST: Simulated forecasts and current observational constraints. PRD111(4), 043503 (2025) https://arxiv.org/abs/2406. 06757 [astro-ph.CO]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.111.043503

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.043503 2025

  4. [4]

    Reconstructing the Hubble parameter with future Gravitational Wave missions using Machine Learning

    Mukherjee, P., Shah, R., Bhaumik, A., Pal, S.: Reconstructing the Hub- ble Parameter with Future Gravitational-wave Missions Using Machine Learning. ApJ960(1), 61 (2024) https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.05169 [astro-ph.CO]. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad055f

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad055f 2024

  5. [6]

    A&A663, 112 (2022) https://arxiv.org/abs/2203

    Moya, A., L´ opez-Sastre, R.J.: Stellar mass and radius estimation using artificial intelligence. A&A663, 112 (2022) https://arxiv.org/abs/2203. 06027 [astro-ph.SR]. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202142930

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142930 2022

  6. [7]

    Mukherjee, P., Dialektopoulos, K.F., Said, J.L., Mifsud, J.: A possible late-time transition of M B inferred via neural networks. J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2024(9), 060 (2024) https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.10502 [astro-ph.CO]. https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2024/09/060

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/09/060 2024

  7. [8]

    Neural network reconstruction of scalar-tensor cosmology

    Dialektopoulos, K.F., Mukherjee, P., Said, J.L., Mifsud, J.: Neural net- work reconstruction of scalar-tensor cosmology. Physics of the Dark Universe43, 101383 (2024) https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.15500 [gr-qc]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2023.101383

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.1016/j.dark.2023.101383 2024

  8. [9]

    Fortunato, J.A.S., Bacon, D.J., Hip´ olito-Ricaldi, W.S., Wands, D.: Springer Nature 2021 LATEX template Article Title31 Fast Radio Bursts and Artificial Neural Networks: a cosmological- model-independent estimation of the Hubble constant. J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2025(1), 018 (2025) https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.03532 [astro-ph.CO]. https://doi.org/10.1...

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/01/018 2021

Show all 107 references
  1. [10]

    Di Valentino, E., Levi Said, J., Riess, A., Pollo, A., Poulin, V., G´ omez- Valent, A., Weltman, A., Palmese, A., Huang, C.D., van de Bruck, C., Shekhar Saraf, C., Kuo, C.-Y., Uhlemann, C., Grand´ on, D., Paz, D., Eckert, D., Teixeira, E.M., Saridakis, E.N., Colg´ ain, E. ´O.,...

    2021 doi arXiv

  2. [11]

    ApJ977(1), 120 (2024) https://arxiv.org/abs/2408

    Riess, A.G., Scolnic, D., Anand, G.S., Breuval, L., Casertano, S., Macri, L.M., Li, S., Yuan, W., Huang, C.D., Jha, S., Murakami, Y.S., Beaton, R., Brout, D., Wu, T., Addison, G.E., Bennett, C., Anderson, R.I., Fil- ippenko, A.V., Carr, A.: JWST Validates HST Distance Measurem...

    2024 doi

  3. [12]

    ApJL962(1), 17 (2024) https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.04773 [astro-ph.CO]

    Riess, A.G., Anand, G.S., Yuan, W., Casertano, S., Dolphin, A., Macri, L.M., Breuval, L., Scolnic, D., Perrin, M., Anderson, R.I.: JWST Obser- vations Reject Unrecognized Crowding of Cepheid Photometry as an Explanation for the Hubble Tension at 8σConfidence. ApJL962(1), 17 (2...

    2024 doi arXiv

  4. [13]

    ApJ961(2), 166 (2024) https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.10859 [astro-ph.SR]

    Madore, B.F., Freedman, W.L.: Systematics in the Cepheid and TRGB Distance Scales: Metallicity Sensitivity of the Wesenheit Leavitt Law. ApJ961(2), 166 (2024) https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.10859 [astro-ph.SR]. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acfaea

    2024 doi arXiv

  5. [14]

    ApJ891(1), 57 (2020) https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.01550 [astro-ph.GA]

    Freedman, W.L., Madore, B.F., Hoyt, T., Jang, I.S., Beaton, R., Lee, M.G., Monson, A., Neeley, J., Rich, J.: Calibration of the Tip of the Red Giant Branch. ApJ891(1), 57 (2020) https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.01550 [astro-ph.GA]. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab7339

    2020 doi arXiv

  6. [15]

    Freedman, W.L., Madore, B.F.: Progress in direct measurements of the Hubble constant. J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2023(11), 050 (2023) https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.05618 [astro-ph.CO]. https://doi. org/10.1088/1475-7516/2023/11/050

    2023 doi arXiv

  7. [16]

    MNRAS495(3), 2630–2644 (2020) https://arxiv.org/abs/1910

    Camarena, D., Marra, V.: A new method to build the (inverse) distance ladder. MNRAS495(3), 2630–2644 (2020) https://arxiv.org/abs/1910. 14125 [astro-ph.CO]. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa770

    2020 doi

  8. [17]

    European Physical Journal C84(8), 873 (2024)

    Gong, X., Liu, T., Wang, J.: Inverse distance ladder method for determining ¡inline-formula id=“IEq1”¿¡mml:math¿¡mml:msub¿¡mml:mi¿H¡/mml:mi¿¡mml:mn¿0¡/mml:mn¿¡/mml:msub¿¡/mml:math¿¡/inline- formula¿ from angular diameter distances of time-delay lenses and supernova observation...

    2024 doi

  9. [18]

    Adame, A.G., Aguilar, J., Ahlen, S., Alam, S., Alexander, D.M., Alvarez, M., Alves, O., Anand, A., Andrade, U., Armengaud, E., Avila, S., Aviles, Springer Nature 2021 LATEX template Article Title33 A., Awan, H., Bahr-Kalus, B., Bailey, S., Baltay, C., Bault, A., Behera, J., Be...

    2021 doi arXiv

  10. [19]

    ApJ659(1), 98–121 (2007) https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0611572 [astro-ph]

    Riess, A.G., Strolger, L.-G., Casertano, S., Ferguson, H.C., Mobasher, B., Gold, B., Challis, P.J., Filippenko, A.V., Jha, S., Li, W., Tonry, J., Foley, R., Kirshner, R.P., Dickinson, M., MacDonald, E., Eisenstein, D., Livio, M., Younger, J., Xu, C., Dahl´ en, T., Stern, D.: N...

    2021 doi arXiv

  11. [20]

    ApJ 859(2), 101 (2018) https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.00845 [astro-ph.CO]

    Scolnic, D.M., Jones, D.O., Rest, A., Pan, Y.C., Chornock, R., Foley, R.J., Huber, M.E., Kessler, R., Narayan, G., Riess, A.G., Rodney, S., Berger, E., Brout, D.J., Challis, P.J., Drout, M., Finkbeiner, D., Lun- nan, R., Kirshner, R.P., Sanders, N.E., Schlafly, E., Smartt, S.,...

    2018 doi arXiv

  12. [21]

    ApJS268(1), 7 (2023) https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.11102 [astro-ph.CO]

    Wang, G.-J., Cheng, C., Ma, Y.-Z., Xia, J.-Q., Abebe, A., Beesham, A.: CoLFI: Cosmological Likelihood-free Inference with Neural Density Estimators. ApJS268(1), 7 (2023) https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.11102 [astro-ph.CO]. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/ace113

    2023 doi arXiv

  13. [22]

    Reports on Progress in Physics86(7), 076901 (2023) https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.15794 [astro-ph.IM]

    Moriwaki, K., Nishimichi, T., Yoshida, N.: Machine learning for obser- vational cosmology. Reports on Progress in Physics86(7), 076901 (2023) https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.15794 [astro-ph.IM]. https://doi.org/ 10.1088/1361-6633/acd2ea

    2023 doi arXiv

  14. [23]

    arXiv e-prints, 2404–19756 (2024) https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.19756 [cs.LG]

    Liu, Z., Wang, Y., Vaidya, S., Ruehle, F., Halverson, J., Soljaˇ ci´ c, M., Hou, T.Y., Tegmark, M.: KAN: Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks. arXiv e-prints, 2404–19756 (2024) https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.19756 [cs.LG]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2404.19756

    2024 doi arXiv

  15. [24]

    arXiv e-prints, 1706–03762 (2017) https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762 [cs.CL]

    Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A.N., Kaiser, L., Polosukhin, I.: Attention Is All You Need. arXiv e-prints, 1706–03762 (2017) https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762 [cs.CL]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1706.03762

    2017 doi arXiv

  16. [25]

    Zhong, F., Luo, R., Napolitano, N.R., Tortora, C., Li, R., Zhu, X., Busillo, V., Koopmans, L.V.E., Longo, G.: Galaxy–Galaxy Strong Lensing with U-Net (GGSL-UNet). I. Extracting Two-dimensional Information from Multiband Images in Ground and Space Observa- tions. ApJS277(1), 12...

    2025 doi arXiv

  17. [26]

    ApJ980(1), 66 (2025) https://arxiv.org/abs/2407

    R´ o˙ za´ nski, T., Ting, Y.-S., Jab lo´ nska, M.: TransformerPayne: Enhancing Spectral Emulation Accuracy and Data Efficiency by Capturing Long- range Correlations. ApJ980(1), 66 (2025) https://arxiv.org/abs/2407. Springer Nature 2021 LATEX template Article Title35 05751 [ast...

    2025 doi

  18. [27]

    arXiv e-prints, 2504–00392 (2025) https://arxiv.org/abs/2504

    Cui, J., Biesiada, M., Liu, A., Wen, C., Liu, T., Wang, J.: Advancing Cos- mological Parameter Estimation and Hubble Parameter Reconstruction with Long Short-Term Memory and Efficient-Kolmogorov-Arnold Net- works. arXiv e-prints, 2504–00392 (2025) https://arxiv.org/abs/2504. 0...

    2025 doi arXiv

  19. [28]

    ApJ938(2), 113 (2022) https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.03863 [astro-ph.CO]

    Scolnic, D., Brout, D., Carr, A., Riess, A.G., Davis, T.M., Dwomoh, A., Jones, D.O., Ali, N., Charvu, P., Chen, R., Peterson, E.R., Popovic, B., Rose, B.M., Wood, C.M., Brown, P.J., Chambers, K., Coulter, D.A., Dettman, K.G., Dimitriadis, G., Filippenko, A.V., Foley, R.J., Jha...

    2022 doi arXiv

  20. [29]

    https://doi.org/ 10.1016/C2017-0-01943-2

    Dodelson, S., Schmidt, F.: Modern Cosmology, (2020). https://doi.org/ 10.1016/C2017-0-01943-2

    2020 doi

  21. [30]

    MNRAS504(4), 5164–5171 (2021) https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.08641 [astro-ph.CO]

    Camarena, D., Marra, V.: On the use of the local prior on the absolute magnitude of Type Ia supernovae in cosmological inference. MNRAS504(4), 5164–5171 (2021) https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.08641 [astro-ph.CO]. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab1200

    2021 doi arXiv

  22. [31]

    arXiv e-prints, 2408–10205 (2024) https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.10205 [cs.LG]

    Liu, Z., Ma, P., Wang, Y., Matusik, W., Tegmark, M.: KAN 2.0: Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks Meet Science. arXiv e-prints, 2408–10205 (2024) https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.10205 [cs.LG]. https://doi.org/10. 48550/arXiv.2408.10205

    2024 arXiv

  23. [32]

    arXiv e-prints, 2406– 13155 (2024) https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.13155 [cs.CV]

    Dylan Bodner, A., Santiago Tepsich, A., Natan Spolski, J., Pourteau, S.: Convolutional Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks. arXiv e-prints, 2406– 13155 (2024) https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.13155 [cs.CV]. https://doi.org/ 10.48550/arXiv.2406.13155

    2024 doi arXiv

  24. [33]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.00019 (2015)

    Lipton, Z.C., Berkowitz, J., Elkan, C.: A critical review of recurrent neural networks for sequence learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.00019 (2015)

    2015 arXiv

  25. [34]

    Machine learning for Brain disorders, 117–138 (2023)

    Das, S., Tariq, A., Santos, T., Kantareddy, S.S., Banerjee, I.: Recurrent neural networks (rnns): architectures, training tricks, and introduction to influential research. Machine learning for Brain disorders, 117–138 (2023)

    2023

  26. [35]

    Artificial Intelligence Review53(8), 5929–5955 Springer Nature 2021 LATEX template 36Article Title (2020)

    Van Houdt, G., Mosquera, C., N´ apoles, G.: A review on the long short- term memory model. Artificial Intelligence Review53(8), 5929–5955 Springer Nature 2021 LATEX template 36Article Title (2020)

    2021

  27. [36]

    Information15(9), 517 (2024)

    Mienye, I.D., Swart, T.G., Obaido, G.: Recurrent neural networks: A comprehensive review of architectures, variants, and applications. Information15(9), 517 (2024)

    2024

  28. [37]

    Neural com- putation9(8), 1735–1780 (1997)

    Hochreiter, S., Schmidhuber, J.: Long short-term memory. Neural com- putation9(8), 1735–1780 (1997)

    1997

  29. [38]

    Neural computation31(7), 1235– 1270 (2019)

    Yu, Y., Si, X., Hu, C., Zhang, J.: A review of recurrent neural networks: Lstm cells and network architectures. Neural computation31(7), 1235– 1270 (2019)

    2019

  30. [39]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.17473 (2023)

    Shiri, F.M., Perumal, T., Mustapha, N., Mohamed, R.: A comprehensive overview and comparative analysis on deep learning models: Cnn, rnn, lstm, gru. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.17473 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  31. [40]

    Neural computation12(10), 2451–2471 (2000)

    Gers, F.A., Schmidhuber, J., Cummins, F.: Learning to forget: Continual prediction with lstm. Neural computation12(10), 2451–2471 (2000)

    2000

  32. [41]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1308.0850 (2013)

    Graves, A.: Generating sequences with recurrent neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1308.0850 (2013)

    2013 arXiv

  33. [42]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.04451 (2020)

    Kitaev, N., Kaiser, L., Levskaya, A.: Reformer: The efficient transformer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.04451 (2020)

    2001 arXiv

  34. [43]

    Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., Toutanova, K.: Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In: Pro- ceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technolo-...

    2019

  35. [44]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.07289 (2015)

    Clevert, D.-A., Unterthiner, T., Hochreiter, S.: Fast and accurate deep network learning by exponential linear units (elus). arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.07289 (2015)

    2015 arXiv

  36. [45]

    Springer, ??? (1999)

    Vapnik, V.: The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Springer, ??? (1999)

    1999

  37. [46]

    Springer, ??? (2009)

    Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., Friedman, J.H., Friedman, J.H.: The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction. Springer, ??? (2009)

    2009

  38. [47]

    ApJ665, 1489–1506 (2007) https://arxiv.org/abs/ 0705.2774

    Kelly, B.C.: Some Aspects of Measurement Error in Linear Regression of Astronomical Data. ApJ665, 1489–1506 (2007) https://arxiv.org/abs/ 0705.2774. https://doi.org/10.1086/519947

    2007 doi arXiv

  39. [48]

    Springer Nature 2021 LATEX template Article Title37 Cambridge University Press, ??? (2012)

    Feigelson, E.D., Babu, G.J.: Modern Statistical Methods for Astronomy. Springer Nature 2021 LATEX template Article Title37 Cambridge University Press, ??? (2012)

    2021

  40. [49]

    Chapman and Hall/CRC, ??? (1984)

    Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Olshen, R.A., Stone, C.J.: Classification and Regression Trees. Chapman and Hall/CRC, ??? (1984)

    1984

  41. [50]

    Wiley interdisciplinary reviews: data mining and knowledge discovery1(1), 14–23 (2011)

    Loh, W.-Y.: Classification and regression trees. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews: data mining and knowledge discovery1(1), 14–23 (2011)

    2011

  42. [51]

    Interna- tional Statistical Review82(3), 329–348 (2014)

    Loh, W.-Y.: Fifty years of classification and regression trees. Interna- tional Statistical Review82(3), 329–348 (2014)

    2014

  43. [52]

    Machine learning45, 5–32 (2001)

    Breiman, L.: Random forests. Machine learning45, 5–32 (2001)

    2001

  44. [53]

    Springer, ??? (2020)

    Genuer, R., Poggi, J.-M., Genuer, R., Poggi, J.-M.: Random Forests. Springer, ??? (2020)

    2020

  45. [54]

    PhD thesis, Universite de Liege (Belgium) (2014)

    Louppe, G.: Understanding random forests: From theory to practice. PhD thesis, Universite de Liege (Belgium) (2014)

    2014

  46. [55]

    Machine learning20, 273–297 (1995)

    Cortes, C., Vapnik, V.: Support-vector networks. Machine learning20, 273–297 (1995)

    1995

  47. [56]

    Noble, W.S.: What is a support vector machine? Nature biotechnology 24(12), 1565–1567 (2006)

    2006

  48. [57]

    Advances in neural information processing systems9(1996)

    Drucker, H., Burges, C.J., Kaufman, L., Smola, A., Vapnik, V.: Support vector regression machines. Advances in neural information processing systems9(1996)

    1996

  49. [58]

    Statistics and computing14, 199–222 (2004)

    Smola, A.J., Sch¨ olkopf, B.: A tutorial on support vector regression. Statistics and computing14, 199–222 (2004)

    2004

  50. [59]

    Analyst135(2), 230–267 (2010)

    Brereton, R.G., Lloyd, G.R.: Support vector machines for classification and regression. Analyst135(2), 230–267 (2010)

    2010

  51. [60]

    Efficient learning machines: Theories, concepts, and applications for engineers and system designers, 67–80 (2015)

    Awad, M., Khanna, R., Awad, M., Khanna, R.: Support vector regres- sion. Efficient learning machines: Theories, concepts, and applications for engineers and system designers, 67–80 (2015)

    2015

  52. [61]

    Guo, G., Wang, H., Bell, D., Bi, Y., Greer, K.: Knn model-based approach in classification. In: On The Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2003: CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE: OTM Confederated Inter- national Conferences, CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE 2003, Catania, Sicily, Italy, Novembe...

    2003

  53. [62]

    In: The Top Ten Algorithms in Data Mining, pp

    Steinbach, M., Tan, P.-N.: knn: k-nearest neighbors. In: The Top Ten Algorithms in Data Mining, pp. 165–176. Chapman and Hall/CRC, ??? (2009) Springer Nature 2021 LATEX template 38Article Title

    2009

  54. [63]

    Neurocomputing251, 26–34 (2017)

    Song, Y., Liang, J., Lu, J., Zhao, X.: An efficient instance selection algo- rithm for k nearest neighbor regression. Neurocomputing251, 26–34 (2017)

    2017

  55. [64]

    Acta numerica8, 143–195 (1999)

    Pinkus, A.: Approximation theory of the mlp model in neural networks. Acta numerica8, 143–195 (1999)

    1999

  56. [65]

    In: Geomatic Approaches for Modeling Land Change Scenarios, pp

    Taud, H., Mas, J.-F.: Multilayer perceptron (mlp). In: Geomatic Approaches for Modeling Land Change Scenarios, pp. 451–455. Springer, ??? (2017)

    2017

  57. [66]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.16674 (2024)

    Yu, R., Yu, W., Wang, X.: Kan or mlp: A fairer comparison. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.16674 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  58. [67]

    Jour- nal of Hydrology649, 132430 (2025)

    Ren, D., Hu, Q., Zhang, T.: EKLT: Kolmogorov-Arnold attention-driven LSTM with Transformer model for river water level prediction. Jour- nal of Hydrology649, 132430 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol. 2024.132430

    2025 doi

  59. [68]

    ApJL934(1), 7 (2022) https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.04510 [astro-ph.CO]

    Riess, A.G., Yuan, W., Macri, L.M., Scolnic, D., Brout, D., Caser- tano, S., Jones, D.O., Murakami, Y., Anand, G.S., Breuval, L., Brink, T.G., Filippenko, A.V., Hoffmann, S., Jha, S.W., D’arcy Kenworthy, W., Mackenty, J., Stahl, B.E., Zheng, W.: A Comprehensive Measure- ment o...

    2022 doi arXiv

  60. [69]

    Planck Collaboration, Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Ballardini, M., Banday, A.J., Barreiro, R.B., Bar- tolo, N., Basak, S., Battye, R., Benabed, K., Bernard, J.-P., Bersanelli, M., Bielewicz, P., Bock, J.J., Bond, J.R., Borrill, J., Bouchet...

    2021 doi arXiv

  61. [70]

    Nature Reviews Physics2(1), 10–12 (2020) https://arxiv.org/abs/2001

    Riess, A.G.: The expansion of the Universe is faster than expected. Nature Reviews Physics2(1), 10–12 (2020) https://arxiv.org/abs/2001. 03624 [astro-ph.CO]. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-019-0137-0

    2020 doi

  62. [71]

    Liddle, A.R.: An Introduction to Modern Cosmology, Third Edition, (2015)

    2015

  63. [72]

    PRD107(6), 063523 (2023) https://arxiv

    Chantada, A.T., Landau, S.J., Protopapas, P., Sc´ occola, C.G., Gar- raffo, C.: Cosmology-informed neural networks to solve the background dynamics of the Universe. PRD107(6), 063523 (2023) https://arxiv. org/abs/2205.02945 [astro-ph.CO]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD. 107.063523

    2023 doi arXiv

  64. [73]

    Steiner, F.: Most frequent value procedures. Geophys. Trans.34(2-3), 139–260 (1988)

    1988

  65. [74]

    (ed.): Optimum Methods in Statistics

    Steiner, F. (ed.): Optimum Methods in Statistics. Akademia Kiado, Budapest, Hungary, ??? (1997)

    1997

  66. [75]

    Acta Geod Geophys.49, 95–104 (2014)

    Szegedi, H., Dobroka, M.: On the use of steiner weights in inversion- based fourier transformation: robustification of a previously published algorithm. Acta Geod Geophys.49, 95–104 (2014)

    2014

  67. [76]

    Szab´ o, N.P., Balogh, G.P., Stickel, J.: Most frequent value-based factor analysis of direct-push logging data. Geophys. Prospect.66(3), 530–548 Springer Nature 2021 LATEX template 40Article Title (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.12573

    2021 doi

  68. [77]

    European Phys- ical Journal C82(12), 1106 (2022) https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.05890 [physics.data-an]

    Zhang, J., Zhang, S., Zhang, Z.-R., Zhang, P., Li, W.-B., Hong, Y.: MFV approach to robust estimate of neutron lifetime. European Phys- ical Journal C82(12), 1106 (2022) https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.05890 [physics.data-an]. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-11071-9

    2022 doi arXiv

  69. [78]

    European Physical Journal C83(10), 930 (2023) https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.06867 [physics.geo-ph]

    Golovko, V.V.: Application of the most frequent value method for 3 9Ar half-life determination. European Physical Journal C83(10), 930 (2023) https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.06867 [physics.geo-ph]. https://doi.org/10. 1140/epjc/s10052-023-12113-6

    2023 arXiv

  70. [79]

    arXiv e-prints, 2410–19988 (2024) https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.19988 [physics.data-an]

    Golovko, V.V.: Estimation of Ru-97 Half-Life Using the Most Fre- quent Value Method and Bootstrapping Techniques. arXiv e-prints, 2410–19988 (2024) https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.19988 [physics.data-an]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.19988

    2024 doi

  71. [80]

    MNRAS468, 5014–5019 (2017)

    Zhang, J.: Most frequent value statistics and distribution of 7Li abun- dance observations. MNRAS468, 5014–5019 (2017). https://doi.org/10. 1093/mnras/stx627

    2017

  72. [81]

    PASP130(990), 084502 (2018)

    Zhang, J.: Most Frequent Value Statistics and the Hubble Constant. PASP130(990), 084502 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1538-3873/ aac767

    2018 doi

  73. [82]

    Sensors23(21), 8856 (2023)

    Golovko, V.V., Kamaev, O., Sun, J.: Unveiling Insights: Harnessing the Power of the Most-Frequent-Value Method for Sensor Data Analysis. Sensors23(21), 8856 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/s23218856

    2023 doi

  74. [83]

    MNRAS (2024)

    Zhang, J., Li, L., Su, H., Chen, Y., Shi, W.: Most frequent value analysis of distance measurements to M87. MNRAS (2024). https://doi.org/10. 1093/mnras/stae1958

    2024

  75. [84]

    Chinese Physics Letters29(1), 019701 (2012)

    Zhang, J., Wang, B., Zhang, B., Han, Z.-W.: Reanalysis of the Iso- topic Mixture of Neutron-Capture Elements in the Metal-Poor Star HD 175305. Chinese Physics Letters29(1), 019701 (2012). https://doi.org/ 10.1088/0256-307X/29/1/019701

    2012 doi

  76. [85]

    Chapman and Hall, ??? (1994)

    Efron, B., Tibshirani, R.: An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman and Hall, ??? (1994)

    1994

  77. [86]

    Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (1997)

    Davison, A.C., Hinkley, D.V.: Bootstrap Methods and Their Application. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (1997)

    1997

  78. [87]

    MNRAS504(3), 3938– 3946 (2021) https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.06066 [astro-ph.CO]

    Mukherjee, P., Mukherjee, A.: Assessment of the cosmic distance duality relation using Gaussian process. MNRAS504(3), 3938– 3946 (2021) https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.06066 [astro-ph.CO]. https:// Springer Nature 2021 LATEX template Article Title41 doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab1054

    2021 doi

  79. [88]

    European Physical Journal C81(1), 36 (2021) https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.10124 [astro-ph.CO]

    Mukherjee, P., Banerjee, N.: Non-parametric reconstruction of the cosmological jerk parameter. European Physical Journal C81(1), 36 (2021) https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.10124 [astro-ph.CO]. https://doi. org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-08830-5

    2021 doi arXiv

  80. [89]

    International Journal of Modern Physics D32(11), 2350079 (2023) https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.14639 [astro-ph.CO]

    Dinda, B.R.: Minimal model-dependent constraints on cosmological nuisance parameters and cosmic curvature from combinations of cos- mological data. International Journal of Modern Physics D32(11), 2350079 (2023) https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.14639 [astro-ph.CO]. https: //doi.org/...

    2023 doi arXiv

  81. [90]

    A model-independent study

    Favale, A., G´ omez-Valent, A., Migliaccio, M.: Cosmic chronome- ters to calibrate the ladders and measure the curvature of the Universe. A model-independent study. MNRAS523(3), 3406–3422 (2023) https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.09591 [astro-ph.CO]. https://doi. org/10.1093/mnras/stad1621

    2023 doi arXiv

  82. [91]

    Banerjee, N., Mukherjee, P., Pav´ on, D.: Checking the second law at cosmic scales. J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2023(11), 092 (2023) https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.12298 [astro-ph.CO]. https://doi. org/10.1088/1475-7516/2023/11/092

    2023 doi

  83. [92]

    arXiv e-prints, 2307–09501 (2023) https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.09501 [astro-ph.CO]

    Moresco, M.: Addressing the Hubble tension with cosmic chronometers. arXiv e-prints, 2307–09501 (2023) https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.09501 [astro-ph.CO]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.09501

    2023 doi arXiv

  84. [93]

    PRD105(4), 043528 (2022) https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.15450 [astro-ph.CO]

    G´ omez-Valent, A.: Measuring the sound horizon and absolute mag- nitude of SNIa by maximizing the consistency between low-redshift data sets. PRD105(4), 043528 (2022) https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.15450 [astro-ph.CO]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.043528

    2022 doi arXiv

  85. [94]

    ApJS246(1), 13 (2020) https://arxiv

    Wang, G.-J., Ma, X.-J., Li, S.-Y., Xia, J.-Q.: Reconstructing Functions and Estimating Parameters with Artificial Neural Networks: A Test with a Hubble Parameter and SNe Ia. ApJS246(1), 13 (2020) https://arxiv. org/abs/1910.03636 [astro-ph.CO]. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-436...

    2020 doi arXiv

  86. [95]

    Euro- pean Physical Journal C84(9), 987 (2024)

    Zammit, S., Suda, D., Sammut, F., Said, J.L.: Estimation of the Hubble constant using Gaussian process regression and viable alternatives. Euro- pean Physical Journal C84(9), 987 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1140/ epjc/s10052-024-13339-8

    2024

  87. [96]

    arXiv e-prints, 0306138 (2003) https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0306138 [physics.data-an] Springer Nature 2021 LATEX template 42Article Title

    Barlow, R.: Asymmetric Systematic Errors. arXiv e-prints, 0306138 (2003) https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0306138 [physics.data-an] Springer Nature 2021 LATEX template 42Article Title

    2003 arXiv

  88. [97]

    Chinese Physics C41(3), 030001 (2017)

    Audi, G., Kondev, F.G., Wang, M., Huang, W.J., Naimi, S.: The NUBASE2016 evaluation of nuclear properties. Chinese Physics C41(3), 030001 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/41/3/030001

    2017 doi

  89. [98]

    Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 125(925), 306–312 (2013)

    Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D.W., Lang, D., Goodman, J.: emcee: The mcmc hammer. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 125(925), 306–312 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1086/670067

    2013 doi

  90. [99]

    Bishop, C.M., Nasrabadi, N.M.: Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning vol. 4. Springer, ??? (2006)

    2006

  91. [100]

    Springer, ??? (2023)

    Bishop, C.M., Bishop, H.: Deep Learning: Foundations and Concepts. Springer, ??? (2023)

    2023

  92. [101]

    Cambridge university press, ??? (2007)

    Press, W.H.: Numerical Recipes 3rd Edition: The Art of Scientific Computing. Cambridge university press, ??? (2007)

    2007

  93. [102]

    In: Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp

    Zhang, H., Li, J., Liang, S., Wang, P., Palpanas, T., Wang, C., Wang, W., Zhou, H., Song, J., Lu, W.: Towards a generic framework for mechanism- guided deep learning for manufacturing applications. In: Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Da...

    2023

  94. [103]

    arXiv e-prints, 2603–27929 (2026) https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27929 [stat.ML]

    Zeraatkar, E., Podorozhny, R., Teˇ si´ c, J.: Physics-Guided Transformer (PGT): Physics-Aware Attention Mechanism for PINNs. arXiv e-prints, 2603–27929 (2026) https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27929 [stat.ML]. https:// doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.27929

    2026 doi

  95. [104]

    Journal of Atmo- spheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics282, 106801 (2026)

    Du, M., Qian, J., Chen, D., Liu, Z., Gao, C., Lou, Y.: Integrating mechanism diagnosis and physics-guided machine learning for wind field simulation and speed correction in complex terrain. Journal of Atmo- spheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics282, 106801 (2026). https://doi. ...

    2026 doi

  96. [105]

    Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics)131(3), 2025–034487 (2026)

    Li, W., Meng, X., Chen, G., Li, J., Zhao, D., Li, L., Zhang, K.: A Geospatially and Physically Guided Method for Correcting Multi-Source Ionospheric Occultation Data Quality. Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics)131(3), 2025–034487 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1029/ 20...

    2025

  97. [106]

    Earth and Space Science13(1), 2025– 004461 (2026)

    Liu, Z., Tan, Y., Zhou, S., Li, Y., Zhang, J., Yang, Y., Shi, Z., Zhou, X.: Physics-Guided CNN-LSTM Model With Multi-Head Attention for Aerosol Optical Depth Prediction. Earth and Space Science13(1), 2025– 004461 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1029/2025EA004461

    2025 doi

  98. [107]

    ApJ959(2), 99 (2023) https://arxiv.org/abs/2303

    Tenachi, W., Ibata, R., Diakogiannis, F.I.: Deep Symbolic Regression for Physics Guided by Units Constraints: Toward the Automated Discovery Springer Nature 2021 LATEX template Article Title43 of Physical Laws. ApJ959(2), 99 (2023) https://arxiv.org/abs/2303. 03192 [astro-ph.I...

    2021 doi

  99. [108]

    arXiv e-prints, 2606–19427 (2026) https: //arxiv.org/abs/2606.19427 [astro-ph.CO]

    Bom, C.R., Fraga, B.M., Sabogal, M.A., Bernui, A., Darc, P., Schwarz, G.: Physics-guided discovery of dynamical dark-energy equations of state through iterative AI reasoning. arXiv e-prints, 2606–19427 (2026) https: //arxiv.org/abs/2606.19427 [astro-ph.CO]. https://doi.org/10....

    2026 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed July 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.