REVIEW 2 cited by
Asymptotic results under multiway clustering
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
If multiway cluster-robust standard errors are used routinely in applied economics, surprisingly few theoretical results justify this practice. This paper aims to fill this gap. We first prove, under nearly the same conditions as with i.i.d. data, the weak convergence of empirical processes under multiway clustering. This result implies central limit theorems for sample averages but is also key for showing the asymptotic normality of nonlinear estimators such as GMM estimators. We then establish consistency of various asymptotic variance estimators, including that of Cameron et al. (2011) but also a new estimator that is positive by construction. Next, we show the general consistency, for linear and nonlinear estimators, of the pigeonhole bootstrap, a resampling scheme adapted to multiway clustering. Monte Carlo simulations suggest that inference based on our two preferred methods may be accurate even with very few clusters, and significantly improve upon inference based on Cameron et al. (2011).
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Clustering with Potential Multidimensionality: Inference and Practice
In finite population M-estimation, cluster-robust standard errors are justified by cluster sampling or cluster assignment, and a covariate-adjusted variance estimator can be valid and less conservative than existing t...
-
On the use of cross-fitting in causal machine learning with correlated units
Standard cross-fitting that ignores correlations between units eliminates bias in causal ML estimators and yields comparable or better bias and precision than correlation-aware variants in simulations.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.