Can crystal symmetry reshape ENZ photonics?: Opinion

Mario G. Silveirinha

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 34 references

Can crystal symmetry reshape ENZ photonics?: Opinion

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Crystal symmetry, via the Berry curvature dipole, can supply the χ(2)-type nonlinearity that ENZ photonics has lacked.

desk verdict A candid opinion piece that usefully reframes Berry-dipole effects as a symmetry-controlled chi(2) axis for ENZ photonics; the numbers anchor the proposal but do not validate the mechanism at ENZ wavelengths. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.03985 v1 pith:UCSZFOVR submitted 2026-08-04 physics.optics

Mario G. Silveirinha This is my paper · ORCID

classification physics.optics PACS 42.65.-k42.65.Ky78.20.Ci

keywords epsilon-near-zeroBerrycurvaturedipoleWeylsemimetalsnonlinearHalleffectsecond-harmonicgenerationelectro-opticchiralgaintime-varyingphotonics

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This opinion paper asks whether crystal symmetry, rather than just carrier density and loss, can shape the response of epsilon-near-zero (ENZ) photonic materials. It argues that low-symmetry conductors with a nonzero Berry curvature dipole carry an extra velocity contribution that ordinary Drude metals lack, and that this contribution acts like a χ(2)-type nonlinearity. Because the effect is set by symmetry and an applied bias, it could bring electro-optic modulation, nonreciprocity, and polarization-dependent gain to ENZ platforms. A quantitative estimate for TaAs gives an effective χ(2) of about 3000 pm/V at 800 nm, comparable to the experimentally measured giant second-harmonic response, and the paper suggests the response grows at longer wavelengths. The concrete payoff would be ENZ devices modulated at the optical-cycle level rather than at the envelope level.

What carries the argument

The Berry curvature dipole is the central object: a tensor D characterizing how the Berry curvature is distributed near the Fermi surface of a non-centrosymmetric conductor. It enters the current equation as an anomalous velocity term proportional to D · (p × E), making the current nonlinear even at the single-particle level. This term is the engine of the paper's argument: from it, Eq. (2) yields a bias-driven electro-optic conductivity, and Eq. (3) yields an effective second-order coefficient χ_BD^(2) ~ eD/[ω(ω + iΓ)]/ε0 that is fixed by crystal symmetry, grows at low frequencies, and can be large enough to rival conventional nonlinear crystals.

What would settle it

Measure the effective second-order coefficient of a low-symmetry conductor (for example, TaAs) in a slab tuned to its ENZ wavelength, with and without a dc bias, and compare with Eq. (3); if the bias-induced electro-optic coefficient is orders of magnitude below the predicted scaling, or no polarization-dependent gain or nonreciprocal rotation appears under a bias current, the central claim would be refuted for that material.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the Berry curvature dipole—the dipolar moment of Berry curvature near the Fermi surface—can supply a second-order nonlinear and electro-optic response in low-symmetry conductors, and that this response is strong enough to matter for ENZ photonics. In the paper's phenomenological model, the free-carrier current acquires an anomalous-velocity term proportional to the Berry-dipole tensor and to the product of carrier momentum and electric field. From that term, a dc bias generates a tensorial permittivity change, while an optical pump generates field-level mixing. The paper's quantitative anchor is Eq. (3): using a first-principles Berry-dipole value D ≈ 0.39 for TaAs

Load-bearing premise

The argument stands on the premise that the Berry-dipole term in the current model is the dominant optical nonlinearity and that some real material combines a large Berry dipole with a usable epsilon-near-zero frequency and acceptable loss.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

ENZ platforms based on Berry-dipole conductors would gain a χ(2)-type modulation channel that follows the optical field itself, enabling modulation on the optical-cycle timescale instead of the envelope timescale.
A static bias converts the Berry-dipole nonlinearity into a nonreciprocal electro-optic response, giving polarization-selective gain and loss without magnetic order.
Chiral gain appears: depending on crystal point group and wave handedness, one circular polarization can be amplified while the other is attenuated, with surface plasmon gain locked to propagation direction.
Even modest Berry-dipole values yield effective χ(2) coefficients comparable to GaAs at 800 nm, and values far larger near electronic resonances and at longer wavelengths.
If the response is confirmed, it offers a route to time-varying photonics—parametric amplification, photonic time crystals, and spacetime crystals—driven by the material's own nonlinearity.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Because Eq. (3) grows at longer wavelengths, the most revealing test would be at the predicted ENZ crossing of a material such as TaAs (roughly 15–30 μm), where the effective χ(2) should be much larger than at 800 nm, although Drude loss will also rise and needs to be included in the comparison.
The Berry-dipole nonlinearity is tied to field-driven anomalous velocity, so it may avoid the slow hot-carrier and thermal pathways that limit conducting-oxide ENZ modulators, making it a candidate for very high speed all-optical switching.
If chiral gain is observed in a planar plasmonic waveguide, the gain channel would be set by crystal orientation and bias direction, suggesting a route to active nonreciprocal or topological components without external magnets.
A mid-infrared pump-probe experiment on tellurium or a Weyl semimetal could reveal the predicted optical-cycle-level mixing as a distinct signature separating Berry-dipole χ(2) from intensity-driven χ(3) processes.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

This is a perspective, not a new result, and it mostly knows that. What it does well is reframe the Berry-dipole nonlinearity as a symmetry-controlled chi(2) response that could complement the usual chi(3) ENZ platform, and it makes a genuinely useful distinction: chi(2) modulation can follow the optical carrier rather than the envelope. The writing is honest about the main open problem—whether any low-symmetry conductor combines a useful ENZ frequency, acceptable loss, and a strong Berry-dipole response—and it points to independent experimental work on TaAs and tellurium. For someone entering this area, the paper is a clear map of the relevant effects and literature.

The soft spots are real but proportionate for an opinion piece. Equation (3), the quantitative anchor, is taken from the author's earlier model without re-derivation here, and the model is phenomenological. The 800 nm TaAs comparison is the most fragile step: the paper itself concedes that TaAs is far from its ENZ crossing at that wavelength, so the close match with the measured chi(2) does not establish that the Berry-dipole current is the mechanism, nor does it predict the response near the ENZ point. The stress-test note is right about that, though not fatal, because the paper uses the number as an illustration of scale rather than as empirical proof. Still, the reader should not come away thinking the Berry-dipole model has been validated at optical frequencies.

Central argument holds up as a speculative proposal. It is clearly labeled as an opinion, the limitations are stated rather than buried, and the author does not oversell the material availability. The main weakness is that the estimate depends on parameters and spectral assumptions that are not fully pinned down, so the flagship 3000 pm/V figure carries more weight than it should.

Who is this for? People working on ENZ nonlinearities or time-varying photonics who want a quick, honest introduction to what Berry-dipole materials might offer. It deserves a serious referee, not a desk reject—an opinion paper can be worth engaging with when it frames an untested but plausible direction this cleanly. In review, the main push should be to mark the 800 nm comparison as illustrative, not validating, and to ask for the parameter dependences behind Eq. (3).

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The opinion paper proposes that low-symmetry conductors with a Berry curvature dipole, described phenomenologically by Eq. (2), can support χ(2)-type nonlinear currents, electro-optic permittivity modulation, and chiral gain, offering a new symmetry-controlled axis for ENZ and time-varying photonics. The quantitative anchor is Eq. (3), yielding χ_BD^(2) ~ 3000 pm/V at 800 nm for TaAs, close to measured second-harmonic coefficient (Ref. 16). The paper also argues that a χ(2) response follows the optical field, enabling cycle-level modulation, unlike effective χ(3) envelope modulation.

Significance. If the Berry-dipole electrodynamics carries over to optical and ENZ frequencies, this would expand ENZ materials beyond centrosymmetric conducting oxides and tie quantum geometry to photonic device functionality, including nonreciprocal and chiral-gain responses without magnetic order, and ultrafast temporal modulation. The paper is honest about the open material question and explicitly states that only experiments can determine the viability. Its chief value is as a research roadmap; the proof-of-principle estimate, however, is not yet a validated prediction.

major comments (3)

[§2, Eq. (3) and TaAs comparison] Eq. (3) is the paper's only quantitative anchor, but it is not derived here and it is applied in a spectral region where the underlying mechanism is not dominant. Ref. [21] places TaAs's ENZ crossing at 15–30 μm; at λ=800 nm the response is interband-dominated, not the free-carrier anomalous-velocity current of Eq. (2). Matching Ref. [16] therefore does not validate the Berry-dipole mechanism. The sentence 'The relevant question...' in §4 is an appropriate caveat, but the estimate still functions as the central supportive evidence. Please re-derive Eq. (3) from Eq. (2) with explicit carrier density, effective mass, tensor D, and the parameter η, and either apply it at wavelengths where the Drude/Berry-dipole current is dominant or downgrade the claim to an order-of-magnitude conjecture with the ENZ-regime uncertainties stated.
[§2, Eq. (2) model validity] The phenomenological current in Eq. (2) is taken from Refs. [13–15] and assumes that the Berry-curvature-dipole contribution can be written as (η/2) D·E × p with a Drude momentum relaxation. This is plausible for low-frequency transport but not self-evident at optical frequencies, where interband transitions and resonance-enhanced nonlinearities (as in Ref. [17]) contribute. The paper should state the frequency/wavelength range of validity of Eq. (2), and give a first-principles or experimental test (e.g., spectral shape of χ^(2) or doping dependence) that would distinguish the Berry-dipole term from ordinary interband χ^(2). Without this, the claim that the effect can be large at ENZ wavelengths remains unsupported.
[§4, ENZ material combination] The central proposed application requires one material that simultaneously has a large D, an accessible ENZ wavelength, and acceptable loss. The paper acknowledges this in §4 but does not identify a candidate or estimate whether the Drude parameters at the ENZ crossing are compatible with the weak-loss limit used in Fig. 1. Eq. (3) is plotted in the ω >> Γ limit; at ENZ wavelengths Γ/ω can be order one for semimetals. Please provide a loss-bounded estimate or identify a specific material (e.g., TaAs at 15–30 μm, or a doped candidate) where Γ/ω << 1 and D is known.

minor comments (3)

[§2, Eq. (2)] The notation is unclear: η, the contraction of the third-rank tensor D with E and p, and the relation between the dimensionless D in Eq. (2) and the tensor element used in Eq. (3) are not defined. Please define all symbols and units explicitly.
[Fig. 1] The figure caption states the blue dot is the experimental result of Ref. [16] at 800 nm, but the curve is Eq. (3) in the weak-loss Drude limit. Since the experiment is in the interband regime, the comparison should be clearly labeled as illustrative only, not as a validation of Eq. (3).
[§3, lines about nonreciprocity] The statement that a bias-driven dc current 'breaks time-reversal symmetry' is imprecise: the equilibrium band structure is time-reversal symmetric, and it is the non-equilibrium current that leads to an effective nonreciprocal linear response. Consider rephrasing to avoid confusion with intrinsic time-reversal breaking.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity; self-citations are present but not load-bearing. The TaAs comparison is an acknowledged consistency check against independent data, not a prediction forced by the model.

full rationale

The paper is an opinion piece that explicitly builds on a 'minimal phenomenological model' (Eq. 2, from Ref. [15]) and derives the order-of-magnitude coefficient Eq. (3) from it. Eq. (3) is not a fit: the Berry-dipole value D=0.39 for TaAs is taken from independent first-principles work (Ref. [19]), and the comparison χ_BD^(2)~3000 pm/V at 800 nm is checked against the independent experimental nonlinearity of Ref. [16]. The paper even states that this experiment was not at the ENZ point and that the ENZ plasma crossing is at 15–30 μm (Ref. [21]), so the match is presented as a scale estimate, not as a prediction derived from the model's inputs. The electro-optic/chiral-gain discussion cites the author's own prior works (Refs. [13,14,22,24,25]), but it is also supported by the independent Te current-induced optical activity experiment (Ref. [11]), the independent chiral-gain calculation for tellurium (Ref. [23]), and independent electro-optic/gain theories (Refs. [26–29]). No uniqueness theorem is imported, no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, and no known result is merely renamed. The paper's own limitation statements ('Only experiments can determine how far this idea can be taken'; 'The relevant question is whether...') make clear that the ENZ viability is an open hypothesis, not a consequence forced by prior self-citation. Any weakness in Eq. (3)'s extrapolation to optical frequencies is a correctness/evidence risk, not a circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper contributes a scaling estimate and a perspective; the central claim rests on the Berry-dipole model from prior work (including the author's own) and on the unverified existence of a suitable material. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)

Berry dipole tensor element D = 0.01-9.88 (representative values from Refs [19,20])
The estimated chi_BD^(2) scales linearly with D; the paper takes D from first-principles calculations rather than fitting it, but the central estimate depends directly on its value.
scattering rate Gamma = not specified; weak-loss limit assumed
Eq. (3) uses the Drude dynamics factor 1/(omega(omega+i Gamma)); in the weak-loss limit Gamma << omega, the estimate is independent of Gamma, but for real materials loss is a key uncertainty.

assumptions (3)

domain assumption Drude model describes free-carrier response in conductors.
Used in Eq. (1) and behind the ENZ response; standard in the field.
domain assumption The Berry curvature dipole produces an anomalous velocity contribution of the form v_an ~ (D·E) x p, leading to Eq. (2).
This is the central physical mechanism, taken from quantum geometry and Refs. [9,13-15]; the paper does not re-derive it.
domain assumption A low-symmetry conductor exists with both a large Berry dipole and an ENZ response at a useful wavelength with acceptable loss.
Explicitly stated as open: 'The relevant question is whether low-symmetry conductors can combine a useful ENZ frequency, acceptable dissipation, and a strong chi(2)-type response.'

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Can crystal symmetry reshape ENZ photonics?: Opinion." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UCSZFOVR

@misc{pith2026260803985,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Can crystal symmetry reshape ENZ photonics?: Opinion},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UCSZFOVR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.03985}
}

read the original abstract

Over the last decade, epsilon-near-zero (ENZ) photonics has been driven by the search for lower losses and stronger nonlinear responses. Here, I ask a different question: can crystal symmetry also be used to shape the ENZ response? I focus on low-symmetry conductors, where the geometry of the electronic states can produce electric currents that are not present in ordinary Drude materials. These currents may enable polarization-dependent gain, nonreciprocal effects, and ultrafast nonlinearities controlled by symmetry and an external bias. I suggest that such materials may be useful for active and time-varying nanophotonics.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

[21]

Optoelectronic res ponse of the type-I Weyl semimetals TaAs and NbAs from first principles

C. A. C. Garcia, J. Coulter, and P. Narang, “Optoelectronic res ponse of the type-I Weyl semimetals TaAs and NbAs from first principles”, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 013073 (2020)

work page 2020
[16]

Giant anisotropic nonlinear optical response in tra nsition-metal monopnictide Weyl semimetals

L. Wu, S. Patankar, T. Morimoto, N. L. Nair, E. Thewalt, A. Lit tle, J. G. Analytis, J. E. Moore, and J. Orenstein, “Giant anisotropic nonlinear optical response in tra nsition-metal monopnictide Weyl semimetals”, Nat. Phys. 13, 350 (2017)

work page 2017
[17]

Res onance-enhanced optical nonlinearity in the Weyl semimetal TaAs

S. Patankar, L. Wu, B. Lu, M. Rai, J. D. Tran, T. Morimoto, D. Parker, A. G. Grushin, N. L. Nair, J. G. Analytis, J. E. Moore, J. Orenstein, and D. H. Torchinsky, “Res onance-enhanced optical nonlinearity in the Weyl semimetal TaAs”, Phys. Rev. B 98, 165113 (2018)

work page 2018
[1]

Tunneling of electromagnetic en ergy through sub-wavelength channels and bends using near-zero-epsilon materials

M. Silveirinha and N. Engheta, “Tunneling of electromagnetic en ergy through sub-wavelength channels and bends using near-zero-epsilon materials”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 157403 (2006)

work page 2006
[2]

Near-zero refractive index photonics

I. Liberal and N. Engheta, “Near-zero refractive index photonics”, Nat. Photon. 11, 149–158 (2017)

work page 2017
[3]

Nonline ar optical effects in epsilon-near-zero media

O. Reshef, I. De Leon, M. Z. Alam, and R. W. Boyd, “Nonline ar optical effects in epsilon-near-zero media”, Nat. Rev. Mat. 4, 535–551 (2019)

work page 2019
[4]

N ear-zero-index materials for photonics

N. Kinsey, C. DeVault, A. Boltasseva, and V. M. Shalaev, “N ear-zero-index materials for photonics”, Nat. Rev. Mat. 4, 742–760 (2019)

work page 2019
[5]

Transparent conducting oxides: From all- dielectric plasmonics to a new paradigm in integrated photonics

W. Jaffray, S. Saha, V. M. Shalaev, A. Boltasseva, and M. F errera, “Transparent conducting oxides: From all- dielectric plasmonics to a new paradigm in integrated photonics”, Adv. Opt. Photonics 14, 148 (2022)

work page 2022

Show all 34 references

[6]

Double-slit time diffraction at optical frequencies

R. Tirole, S. Vezzoli, E. Galiffi, I. Robertson, D. Maurice , B. Tilmann, S. A. Maier, J. B. Pendry, and R. Sapienza, “Double-slit time diffraction at optical frequencies”, Nat. Phys. 19, 999 (2023)

2023
[7]

Time-refraction optics with single c ycle modulation

E. Lustig, O. Segal, S. Saha, E. Bordo, S. N. Chowdhury, Y. Sha rabi, A. Fleischer, A. Boltasseva, O. Cohen, V. M. Shalaev, and M. Segev, “Time-refraction optics with single c ycle modulation”, Nanophotonics 12, 2221 (2023)

2023
[8]

All-optical polarization control in time-varying l ow-index films via plasma symmetry breaking

W. Jaffray, S. Stengel, A. Boltasseva, V. M. Shalaev, M. A. Vin centi, D. de Ceglia, M. Scalora, C. Rizza, and M. Ferrera, “All-optical polarization control in time-varying l ow-index films via plasma symmetry breaking”, Nat. Photon. (2026), doi: 10.1038/s41566-026-01886-3

2026 doi
[9]

Quantum nonlinear Hall effect induced b y Berry curvature dipole in time-reversal invariant materials

I. Sodemann and L. Fu, “Quantum nonlinear Hall effect induced b y Berry curvature dipole in time-reversal invariant materials”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 216806 (2015)

2015
[10]

Berry-phase effects on elect ronic properties

D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, “Berry-phase effects on elect ronic properties”, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1959– 2007 (2010)

1959
[11]

Optical activity in tellurium induced by a current

E. L. Vorob’ev, E. L. Ivchenko, G. E. Pikus, I. I. Farbshtein, V. A. Shalygin, and A. V. Shturbin, “Optical activity in tellurium induced by a current”, JETP Lett. 29, 441 (1979)

1979
[12]

Gyrotropic effects in trigonal tellurium studied from first principles

S. S. Tsirkin, P. A. Puente, and I. Souza, “Gyrotropic effects in trigonal tellurium studied from first principles”, Phys. Rev. B 97, 035158 (2018)

2018
[13]

Engineering transistor-like optical gain in two-dimensional materials with Berry curvature dipoles

T. G. Rappoport, T. A. Morgado, S. Lannebère, and M. G. Silveir inha, “Engineering transistor-like optical gain in two-dimensional materials with Berry curvature dipoles”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 076901 (2023)

2023
[14]

Non-Hermitian Linear Electrooptic Effect in 3D materials

T. A. Morgado, T. G. Rappoport, S. S. Tsirkin, S. Lannebère, I. Souza, and M. G. Silveirinha, “Non-Hermitian Linear Electrooptic Effect in 3D materials”, Phys. Rev. B 109, 245126 (2024)

2024
[15]

Non-Hermitian Linear Electro-Optic Effect Through Interactions of Free and Bound Charges

S. Lannebère, N. Engheta, and M. G. Silveirinha, “Non-Hermitian Linear Electro-Optic Effect Through Interactions of Free and Bound Charges”, Phys. Rev. B, 113, 045158, (2026)

2026
[18]

Berry curvature dipole induced giant mid-infrared second-har monic generation in 2D Weyl semiconductor

Q. Fu, et al , “Berry curvature dipole induced giant mid-infrared second-har monic generation in 2D Weyl semiconductor”, Adv. Mater. 35, 2306330 (2023)

2023
[19]

Berry curvature dipole in Weyl semim etal materials: An ab initio study

Y. Zhang, Y. Sun, B. Yan, “Berry curvature dipole in Weyl semim etal materials: An ab initio study”, Phys. Rev. B 97, 041101(R) (2018)

2018
[20]

Strongly enhanced Berry dipole at topological phase transitions in BiTeI

J. I. Facio, D. Efremov, K. Koepernik, J.-S. You, I. Sodemann, and J. van den Brink, “Strongly enhanced Berry dipole at topological phase transitions in BiTeI”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 246403 (2018)

2018
[22]

Symmetry Analysis of the Non-Hermitian Electro-Optic Effect in Crystals

S. Lannebère, T. G. Rappoport, T. A. Morgado, I. Souza, and M. G. Silveirinha, “Symmetry Analysis of the Non-Hermitian Electro-Optic Effect in Crystals”, Phys. Rev. B, ( 2 0 2 6 ) ( i n p r e s s , a v a i l a b l e a t arXiv:2502.03399)

arXiv
[23]

Berry c urvature dipole induced chiral terahertz gain and lasing threshold in bulk tellurium,

M. Eslami, A. Hakimi, L. A. Jauregui, and F. Capolino, “Berry c urvature dipole induced chiral terahertz gain and lasing threshold in bulk tellurium,” Phys. Rev. B 113, 195202 (2026)

2026
[24]

Gain-momentum locking in a chiral-gain medium

J. C. Serra, N. Engheta, and M. G. Silveirinha, “Gain-momentum locking in a chiral-gain medium”, Phys. Rev. Appl. (2026) (in press, available at arXiv:2410.08962)

2026
[25]

Topological Chiral-Gain in a Berry Dipole Material

F. R. Prudêncio, M. G. Silveirinha, “Topological Chiral-Gain in a Berry Dipole Material”, Nanophotonics, 14 3991, (2025) (doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2024-0681)

2025 doi
[26]

Linear mag netoelectric electro-optical effect

D. J. P. de Sousa, C. O. Ascencio, and T. Low, “Linear mag netoelectric electro-optical effect”, Phys. Rev. B 110, 115421 (2024)

2024
[27]

Optical Gain Through Metallic Electro-Optical Effects

N. Roldan-Levchenko, D. J. P. de Sousa, C. O. Ascencio, J. D. S. Forte, L. Martin-Moreno, and T. Low, “Optical Gain Through Metallic Electro-Optical Effects”, arXiv:2510.25659 (2025)

2025
[28]

Berry-dipole photovoltaic demon and the thermodynamics of photocurrent generation within the optical gap of metals

L.-K. Shi, O. Matsyshyn, J. C. W. Song, and I. S. Villadie go, “Berry-dipole photovoltaic demon and the thermodynamics of photocurrent generation within the optical gap of metals”, Phys. Rev. B 107, 125151 (2023)

2023
[29]

High-efficiency energy harvesting ba sed on nonlinear Hall rectifier

Y. Onishi and L. Fu, “High-efficiency energy harvesting ba sed on nonlinear Hall rectifier”, Phys. Rev. B 110, 075122 (2024)

2024
[30]

Photonics of time-varying media,

E. Galiffi, R. Tirole, S. Yin, H. Li, S. Vezzoli, P. A. Hu idrobo, M. G. Silveirinha, R. Sapienza, A. Alù and J. B. Pendry, “Photonics of time-varying media,” Adv. Photon. 4, 014002 (2022)

2022
[31]

Four-dimensional optics using time-varying me tamaterials

N. Engheta, “Four-dimensional optics using time-varying me tamaterials”, Science 379, 1 094 (2023)

2023
[32]

Photonic Time Crystals and Parametric Ampl ification: Similarity and Distinction,

J. B. Khurgin, “Photonic Time Crystals and Parametric Ampl ification: Similarity and Distinction,” ACS Photonics 11, 2150–2159 (2024)

2024
[33]

Second harmonic generation and nonlinear frequency conversion in photonic time-crystals

N. Konforty, M.-I. Cohen, O. Segal, Y. Plotnik, V. M. Shal aev, and M. Segev, “Second harmonic generation and nonlinear frequency conversion in photonic time-crystals”, Light: Science & Applications 14, 152 (2025)

2025
[34]

Superluminal Spaceti me Crystals Induced by Anomalous Velocity Modulation

F. R. Prudêncio, M. G. Silveirinha, “Superluminal Spaceti me Crystals Induced by Anomalous Velocity Modulation”, Appl. Phys. Lett., 128, 241103, (2026)

2026

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [21]

Optoelectronic res ponse of the type-I Weyl semimetals TaAs and NbAs from first principles

C. A. C. Garcia, J. Coulter, and P. Narang, “Optoelectronic res ponse of the type-I Weyl semimetals TaAs and NbAs from first principles”, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 013073 (2020)

work page 2020

[2] [16]

Giant anisotropic nonlinear optical response in tra nsition-metal monopnictide Weyl semimetals

L. Wu, S. Patankar, T. Morimoto, N. L. Nair, E. Thewalt, A. Lit tle, J. G. Analytis, J. E. Moore, and J. Orenstein, “Giant anisotropic nonlinear optical response in tra nsition-metal monopnictide Weyl semimetals”, Nat. Phys. 13, 350 (2017)

work page 2017

[3] [17]

Res onance-enhanced optical nonlinearity in the Weyl semimetal TaAs

S. Patankar, L. Wu, B. Lu, M. Rai, J. D. Tran, T. Morimoto, D. Parker, A. G. Grushin, N. L. Nair, J. G. Analytis, J. E. Moore, J. Orenstein, and D. H. Torchinsky, “Res onance-enhanced optical nonlinearity in the Weyl semimetal TaAs”, Phys. Rev. B 98, 165113 (2018)

work page 2018

[4] [1]

Tunneling of electromagnetic en ergy through sub-wavelength channels and bends using near-zero-epsilon materials

M. Silveirinha and N. Engheta, “Tunneling of electromagnetic en ergy through sub-wavelength channels and bends using near-zero-epsilon materials”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 157403 (2006)

work page 2006

[5] [2]

Near-zero refractive index photonics

I. Liberal and N. Engheta, “Near-zero refractive index photonics”, Nat. Photon. 11, 149–158 (2017)

work page 2017

[6] [3]

Nonline ar optical effects in epsilon-near-zero media

O. Reshef, I. De Leon, M. Z. Alam, and R. W. Boyd, “Nonline ar optical effects in epsilon-near-zero media”, Nat. Rev. Mat. 4, 535–551 (2019)

work page 2019

[7] [4]

N ear-zero-index materials for photonics

N. Kinsey, C. DeVault, A. Boltasseva, and V. M. Shalaev, “N ear-zero-index materials for photonics”, Nat. Rev. Mat. 4, 742–760 (2019)

work page 2019

[8] [5]

Transparent conducting oxides: From all- dielectric plasmonics to a new paradigm in integrated photonics

W. Jaffray, S. Saha, V. M. Shalaev, A. Boltasseva, and M. F errera, “Transparent conducting oxides: From all- dielectric plasmonics to a new paradigm in integrated photonics”, Adv. Opt. Photonics 14, 148 (2022)

work page 2022