Bar-spiral interaction produces radial migration and star formation bursts

Bridget Ratcliffe; Daniel B. Zucker; Georges Kordopatis; Ivan Minchev; L\'ea Marques; Marie Martig; Mathias Schultheis; Matthias Steinmetz; Sergey Khoperskov; Tobias Buck

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Bar-spiral interaction produces radial migration and star formation bursts

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that each time a galaxy's bar catches up with a spiral arm, the contact zone drives bursts of stellar migration and star formation — a new mechanism that can carry bar-born stars out to the solar radius.

desk verdict Genuinely new time- and azimuth-resolved evidence that bar–spiral overlap drives migration and starbursts, but the causal timing rests on peak counts rather than on demonstrated phase alignment. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.02651 v1 pith:UGE3YCNI submitted 2025-02-04 astro-ph.GA

Léa Marques , Ivan Minchev , Bridget Ratcliffe , Sergey Khoperskov , Matthias Steinmetz , Trey V. Wenger , Tobias Buck , Marie Martig

show 3 more authors

Georges Kordopatis Mathias Schultheis Daniel B. Zucker

This is my paper · ORCID

classification astro-ph.GA

keywords barredgalaxiesspiralstructureradialmigrationstarformationburstsgalacticdynamicsAPOGEEDR17WISEHIIregionsN-bodysimulations

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the periodic physical overlap between a galaxy's central bar and its spiral arms drives both stellar radial migration and bursts of star formation at the bar ends. Using three hydrodynamical simulations and Milky Way data, the authors show that migration strength near the bar peaks exactly when the bar half-length peaks, which earlier work identified as bar-spiral connection times. The same coincidence appears in the star formation rate, which rises by a factor of 3 to 4 during overlaps. If established, the mechanism explains how a substantial share of solar-neighborhood stars (about 13% in the Milky Way) could have been born inside the bar and reached the Sun's radius on cold, nearly circular orbits.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the bar-spiral reconnection cycle, traced by the Lcont bar half-length: the length at which the background-subtracted density drops to 50% of the central value when the bar is disconnected from spirals, with peaks indicating connection. The argument compares this independent time series with the migration strength ($\Delta R_g$ over $\Delta t = 0.1$ Gyr) and with star formation counts in 2x2 kpc boxes at the bar ends, and verifies that both peak counts agree with the reconnection times expected from Fourier analysis of spiral modes. The time-varying potential created at the bar-spiral interface replaces the transient-spiral picture with a periodic, predictable driver.

What would settle it

Simulate a barred galaxy with spiral perturbations removed or suppressed, leaving only the bar; if migration-strength or star-formation peaks still track bar-length oscillations, the overlap is not the cause. For the Milky Way part, measure the completeness of the WISE HII catalog toward the far side of the bar; if the 2:1 asymmetry between bar ends disappears after completeness correction, the observational starburst signal is not established.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that bar-spiral reconnection is a new, time-dependent migration and star-formation mechanism. In all three models, the standard deviation of the change in guiding radius over 100 Myr oscillates with the same frequency as the bar half-length, whose maxima mark physical contact with a spiral arm; the peak counts match the bar-spiral reconnection times derived from Fourier mode decomposition. The migration is directional: stars on the bar's leading side move inward, while stars along the trailing side and minor axis move outward, with the most extreme 5% gaining 3-4 kpc in 100 Myr. The signature spans from the bar's inner Lindblad resonance to beyond corotation, beyond which other drivers dominate. In the Milky Way, APOGEE DR17 stars with bar-like birth radii are mostly metal-rich, old, and on cold orbits, and the WISE HII catalog shows twice as many HII regions toward one end of the bar, which the authors interpret as an odd spiral mode causing starbursts at one end at a time.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that a maximum in the measured bar half-length is a faithful and exclusive sign that the bar has physically connected to a spiral arm, so that the observed peak-count agreement between bar length, migration, and star formation proves the causal link.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Bar-born, metal-rich stars can reach the solar radius on cold orbits, so a non-negligible share of local stars (about 13% in the Milky Way) has a bar origin rather than a local one.
Chemical-evolution and abundance-gradient models should include periodic bar-spiral overlaps as a migration source, not only transient spirals or bar slowdown.
Star formation histories of barred galaxies should show periodic bursts at the bar ends, with amplitudes up to a factor of 4 and possibly offset between the two bar ends.
Measuring migration strength over timescales of about 0.5 Gyr or longer washes the bursts out; short (about 0.1 Gyr) sampling windows are needed to see the mechanism.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Editorial inference: if the beat frequency between bar and spiral modes sets the migration rhythm, then galaxies with similar bar lengths but different pattern speeds should differ systematically in how far bar-born stars travel; this could be tested by comparing migration-strength power spectra across a larger simulation suite.
Editorial inference: the mechanism predicts azimuthally asymmetric migration and star formation in face-on barred galaxies, so resolved integral-field or high-resolution imaging surveys of such galaxies could look for starbursts that alternate between the two bar ends on the reconnection timescale.
Editorial inference: in the Milky Way, the same overlaps that create migration bursts should imprint phase-space structure, such as ridges or moving groups, whose ages trace the last reconnection events; Gaia astrometry combined with spectroscopic ages could look for this signature.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The paper's real contribution is the time- and azimuth-resolved demonstration that migration strength near the bar ends oscillates on the bar–spiral beat timescale, and that the star formation rate at the bar ends does the same. That is new and worth taking seriously. The authors use three different simulation setups (two cosmological, one isolated), and they handle APOGEE selection functions and uncertainties carefully in the appendix. The azimuthal diagnostic — net inward migration on the leading side, outward on the trailing side and minor axis — is genuinely interesting and should be useful for future work. The factor 3–4 starburst enhancement is a concrete, testable prediction.

The soft spots are real but not fatal. The central causal step is peak-count matching. The number of migration and SF peaks is compared to the expected bar–spiral reconnection counts inherited from Hilmi et al. (2020), and to peaks in the bar length measured with the same Lcont method. That is a frequency argument, not a phase-coincidence argument. The stress-test note is right: the paper never shows quantitatively that each migration/SF burst occurs at zero lag relative to the bar-length maxima. The caption in Fig. 5 hedges with "or their frequency," and only for Model3 is a small time offset mentioned. The snapshot figures (Fig. 2 and 3) do show stronger migration at selected connection times, which is phase evidence for a few epochs, but the long-term statistical support is essentially counting peaks. This matters because the abstract claims bursts occur "when" the bar and spiral overlap. The bar length itself is an indirect proxy for physical overlap, and the peak counts are sensitive to smoothing — a limitation the authors acknowledge. The WISE HII asymmetry in the Milky Way is intriguing, but the catalog completeness toward both bar ends is not discussed, so selection effects remain a possible alternative explanation. None of this kills the paper; the mechanism is plausible and the simulations are internally consistent. The central fix is straightforward: compute a cross-correlation or phase lag between migration/SFR and the bar-length peaks, and show that the bursts align with connection times rather than merely sharing a period. TheMilky Way 13% bar-born fraction is an interesting anchor but rests on the same group's birth-radius method, so it should be framed as model-dependent.

This is a solid, important paper for the galactic dynamics and archaeology community. It deserves a serious referee. I would send it to peer review with the expectation that the causal timing argument be strengthened and the WISE completeness caveat addressed.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies three barred galaxy simulations (Model1 and Model2 cosmological; Model3 isolated) and compares them with APOGEE DR17 birth-radius distributions and the WISE HII-region catalog, in order to argue that periodic physical overlaps between the bar and spiral arms drive recurrent bursts of stellar radial migration near the bar ends and periodic starbursts there. The authors define migration strength as the standard deviation of the change in guiding radius over 100 Myr, measure its time evolution in small azimuthal regions around the bar, show a leading/trailing asymmetry in migration direction, and report that the number of peaks in migration strength and star formation rate is close to the bar-spiral reconnection counts previously derived for the same simulations by Hilmi et al. (2020). They then use the APOGEE-comparable simulated solar neighborhoods to estimate that 5-20% of solar-radius stars were born inside the bar, compare this with a 13% estimate for the Milky Way, and interpret an asymmetric WISE HII-region longitude distribution as evidence for odd spiral modes causing asymmetric starbursts at the two bar ends.

Significance. The azimuthally resolved, time-resolved view of migration strength near the bar ends is a useful and, to my knowledge, new diagnostic, and the comparison with APOGEE includes a careful treatment of mono-age selection functions and birth-radius uncertainties. If the central causal claim were established, the paper would identify a plausible new migration channel that preserves cold orbits and couples dynamics to star formation on a characteristic beat period, with testable predictions for external galaxies and for the Milky Way. The measured 13% in-bar birth fraction for solar-neighborhood stars is also an interesting observational anchor. However, the manuscript's central claim -- that the boosts occur *when* the bar and spiral overlap -- is currently supported only by a peak-count agreement against a bar-length proxy, not by a phase-coincidence analysis. Because two periodic signals with the same period can have any relative phase, the evidence as presented establishes a common beat frequency but not the stated temporal relation. This is the main load-bearing gap.

major comments (4)

[Sec. 4.1 / Fig. 5] The abstract states that periodic boosts in migration occur 'when the bar and spiral structure overlap,' but the quantitative support in Fig. 5 is a comparison of peak counts (Npeaks) between migration statistics and the bar half-length. Two periodic signals with the same frequency can have any relative phase, so equal peak counts cannot distinguish bursts at bar-spiral connection from bursts at disconnection or from bursts with a constant time lag. The caption of Fig. 5 itself hedges that 'the maxima in the migration strength, or their frequency, coincide with those of the bar half-length,' and only for Model3 is a small time offset mentioned. I request a direct phase-coincidence test: compute the cross-correlation (or lag) between Rbar(t) and each migration statistic, with uncertainties from bootstrap resampling over choices of smoothing width, and report the lag and its statistical significance for all three models.
[Sec. 5 / Fig. 9] The same peak-count logic is used to claim that starbursts at the bar ends are caused by bar-spiral overlaps. The paper itself states (Sec. 5) that 'the number of peaks is sensitive to the smoothing width,' and the choice of wider Gaussian smoothing for star formation than for bar length is justified only qualitatively. A model with an identical reconnection period but with starbursts occurring exactly between bar-length peaks would give the same Npeaks values as the present data. To support the factor-3 and factor-4 enhancement claims, the authors should show that each starburst is phase-aligned with a bar-length maximum at that same bar side, and should quote error bars on the enhancement factor that include variations in the smoothing width and in the definition of the baseline star formation rate.
[Sec. 4.1 and Hilmi et al. (2020) methodology] The bar length measured with the Lcont method is not an independent tracer of bar-spiral overlap: the Lcont definition identifies the bar as separated from the spiral, and the bar-length peaks are interpreted as connection times, with the expected peak counts inherited from the same simulations analyzed by Hilmi et al. (2020). This creates an appearance of circularity for the central causal step. The circularity is only partial because the migration and star-formation measurements are made independently of the bar-length curve, but the paper would be much stronger if it computed the bar-spiral relative phase directly (for example, the angle between the bar major axis and the m=2 spiral phase) and showed that the migration ridge amplitude and the starburst amplitude peak when that phase separation is near zero. This would also provide the missing check that the Rbar peaks used as overlap indicators actually correspond to physical overlap episodes.
[Sec. 5 / Fig. 10] The Milky Way argument based on the WISE HII-region catalog assumes comparable completeness toward the near and far ends of the bar. The figure shows a 2:1 asymmetry between the (30 ± 2.5)° and (-15 ± 2.5)° wedges, but the catalog is selected in the infrared and the sight lines differ substantially in distance, extinction, and diffuse background. Unless completeness or a distance-limited subsample is considered, the observed asymmetry cannot be unambiguously attributed to a physical asymmetry in star formation at the two bar ends. Please quantify the selection effects, or at minimum discuss the completeness limits and compare with radio-selected HII-region samples.

minor comments (5)

[Abstract and Sec. 1] There are several typos: 'phhenomenon' in the abstract, 'Lindbald' for Lindblad in the Introduction, 'alo' and 'exepected' in Sec. 5, and 'riticle number' in the page header. These should be corrected in a final pass.
[Fig. 5 caption] The caption says the maxima, 'or their frequency,' coincide with those of the bar half-length. This wording is more cautious than the abstract's 'when' relation. If the phase-coincidence analysis requested above is not added, the abstract and conclusions should be revised to claim only a common frequency, not a temporal coincidence.
[Sec. 5 / Fig. 10] The histogram in Fig. 10 would benefit from stating the longitude bin width, the KDE bandwidth, and the coordinate convention for the near and far bar ends in the caption, so that the 2:1 ratio can be reproduced from the plotted data.
[Sec. 4.1 / Fig. 5 peak counting] The peak counts are obtained with scipy's find_peaks function, but the manuscript does not give the prominence or distance parameters used. Since the smoothing widths already influence Npeaks, the peak-counting parameters should be stated explicitly for reproducibility.
[Sec. 4.2] The percentages quoted for stars born inside the bar (1.75-8.5% cold, 3.5-18% warm in simulations, and 13% for the Milky Way) are presented without uncertainties. Given that they depend on the APOGEE selection-function fitting and on the assumed Rbar value, a bootstrap or propagation estimate would help the reader judge the significance of the MW-simulation agreement.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the migration and star-formation statistics are measured independently, and the Hilmi et al. (2020) reconnection times are used as external consistency checks rather than fitted inputs.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain measures migration strength as the standard deviation of guiding-radius changes over 100 Myr in fixed 2x2 kpc regions, and star formation as the number of stars born in those regions, while bar half-length is measured separately with the Lcont method. The claimed causal link to bar-spiral overlap is supported by comparing peak frequencies of these independently measured time series with reconnection times reported by Hilmi et al. (2020) for the same simulations. No quantity used as a prediction is defined in terms of another predicted quantity, and no parameter is fitted to the data and then renamed as a prediction. The reliance on Hilmi et al. for the interpretation that bar-length maxima correspond to bar-spiral connection is a self-citation with overlapping authorship, but it is prior, externally checkable work and not an assumption constructed within this paper. The skeptical objection that the paper compares peak counts rather than phase alignment is a legitimate evidentiary limitation, but it concerns the strength of the causal inference, not circularity, because the migration and star-formation series are not constructed to match the bar-length series. Thus no circular step can be exhibited, and the paper is self-contained in its measurements.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles or forces are introduced. The non-bisymmetric/odd spiral mode used to explain the MW asymmetry is an existing dynamical mode, not a new entity. The central claim rests on inherited diagnostics (bar length, T_rec, birth radii) and hand-chosen analysis parameters rather than on a closed-form derivation.

free parameters (4)

Gaussian smoothing widths for bar length, migration, and SF curves = Model1: 8/5/10.35 Myr; Model2: 9/?/12.15 Myr; Model3: 17/7/? Myr
Hand-chosen per model after inspection; the paper admits peak counts are sensitive to these widths and that SF was smoothed more heavily to reduce the number of peaks, which affects the claimed frequency agreement.
5% most-extreme-migrator percentile = 5%
Defined by hand to characterize tail migration; results are qualitative and the threshold is not derived from data.
AIC-selected Gaussian mixture components for APOGEE monoage selection functions and birth-radius error distributions = 1-3 components per age bin
Fitted to APOGEE DR17 data to bias simulations; the resulting 13% bar-born fraction depends on these fits.
Size and placement of square regions around the bar = 2x2 kpc2 squares centered at ±(Rbar,0), minor axis, and shifted radii
Region size and positions are hand-picked; they determine which stars enter the migration and SF statistics.

assumptions (6)

standard math Flat rotation curve approximation for guiding radius and eccentricity (Eqs. 1-2)
Used throughout to compute Rg and e; the authors note it underestimates inner guiding radii but state dividing V0 by 2 for R<3 kpc does not change conclusions.
domain assumption Bar length maxima (Lcont method, Hilmi et al. 2020) trace bar-spiral physical overlap
The paper uses bar half-length peaks as the diagnostic for bar-spiral connection; if bar length fluctuates from other processes, the causal link to migration/SF is not established.
domain assumption Reconnection timescales T_rec from Hilmi et al. (2020) for the same models are valid here
Expected peak counts (21, 13, 4) are computed from these timescales; this is a consistency check against an inherited quantity, not an independent measurement.
domain assumption Birth radii from Ratcliffe et al. (2024) applied to APOGEE DR17 are accurate birth-radius estimates
The 13% MW fraction and the age/metallicity comparisons rest on this method, which is from the same group and is not re-derived here.
domain assumption APOGEE selection effects can be captured by monoage radial rejection sampling and Gaussian errors
The simulation-to-data comparison in Sec 4.2 assumes the fitted monoage radial distributions fully describe the APOGEE selection function; residual biases in metallicity or azimuth are not included.
domain assumption WISE HII catalog completeness is symmetric toward the near and far bar ends
The 2:1 asymmetry in HII region counts is interpreted as an odd spiral mode; no correction for Galactic longitude-dependent completeness or extinction is presented.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Bar-spiral interaction produces radial migration and star formation bursts." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UGE3YCNI

@misc{pith2026250202651,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Bar-spiral interaction produces radial migration and star formation bursts},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UGE3YCNI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.02651}
}

read the original abstract

Central bars and spirals are known to strongly impact the evolution of their host galaxies, both in terms of dynamics and star formation. Their typically different pattern speeds cause them to regularly overlap, which induces fluctuations in bar parameters. In this paper, we analyze both numerical simulations of disk galaxies and observational data to study the effect of bar-spiral physical overlap on stellar radial migration and star formation in the bar vicinity, as a function of time and galactic azimuth. We study three different numerical models, two of which are in a cosmological context, as well as APOGEE DR17 data and the WISE catalog of Galactic HII regions. We find that periodic boosts in stellar radial migration occur when the bar and spiral structure overlap. This mechanism causes net inward migration along the bar leading side, while stars along the bar trailling side and minor axis are shifted outward. The signature of bar-spiral induced migration is seen between the bar's inner Lindbald resonance and well outside its corotation, beyond which other drivers take over. We also find that, in agreement with simulations, APOGEE DR17 stars born at the bar vicinity (mostly metal-rich) can migrate out to the solar radius while remaining on cold orbits. For the Milky Way, 13% of stars in the solar vicinity were born inside the bar, compared to 5-20% in the simulations. Bar-spiral reconnections also result in periodic starbursts at the bar ends with an enhancement of up to a factor of 4, depending on the strength of the spiral structure. Similarly to the migration bursts, these do not always happen simultaneously at the two sides of the bar, hinting at the importance of odd spiral modes. Data from the WISE catalog suggest this phhenomenon is also relevant in our own Galaxy.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.02651 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** Face-on (top row) and edge-on (bottom row) density map of the three models (from left to right) at the last snapshots, and the APOGEE DR17 sample used (right). The dashed black circle indicates the bar length, while the pink circle indicates the bar’s CR. They coincide for Model1. The black star indicates the location of the (simulated) Sun. Rotation is in the counterclockwise direction. The 2×2 kpc2 squares show th… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Change of guiding radius over ∆t = 0.1 Gyr vs initial guiding radius for Model1, Model2 and Model3 stars from top to bottom. Each column represents a different initial time, increasing from left to right as indicated in the top of each panel. These times were chosen to be at moments when the bar and the spiral are connected or disconnected. The dashed horizontal black line shows ∆Rg = 0, (i.e., no migration). All po… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Two-dimensional histograms of the change in guiding radius over ∆t = 0.1 Gyr with respect to the initial azimuthal angle for stars in Model3 initially in different 2-kpc-wide radial bins. Each column is for a different radial bin, going further out from left to right as indicated in each panel. The bar ends (Rbar = 3.15 kpc) is encompassed in the second column and is indicated in bold, while the corotation (RCR = 5.… view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (7 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Time evolution of migration strength from different galactic disk radii in Model3. In each panel, the different curves correspond to the migration strength (i.e., how far stars found in this region at some time t migrate after ∆t) of stars originally found in each of t…

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Time evolution of different migration statistics compared to bar length time evolution, for the three models (from left to right). Different azimuths around the bar radius are scanned using the six 2 × 2 kpc2 square regions shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p…

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Birth radius distribution of stars found at the solar radius today (inside the gray vertical strip) of, from left to right, the two cosmological models Model1 and Model2, and the APOGEE DR17 red giant sample. The black curves are for the whole samples. In the top row, …

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Age distribution of stars found at solar radius today but born inside Rbar. The two curves follow the same linestyle and color code as in the top row of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Model1 star formation temporal evolution in 2 × 2 kpc2 square regions centered at increasing radii from left to right and top to bottom, spanning radii from 2.25 kpc to 5.25 kpc. The squares of the leading and trailing sides of the bar, shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figur…

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Comparison of the time evolution of the star formation in the four square regions used in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png]

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: Distribution of HII regions in the Milky Way as a function of galactic longitude. The red curve is a kernel density estimate of the histogram, in black, which shows data from the WISE catalog. Regions shaded in blue and orange are in the direction of the near and far …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Stellar Velocity Dispersion versus Age: Consistency across Observations and Simulations, with the Milky Way as an Outlier
astro-ph.GA 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

The Milky Way is a kinematic outlier, with 2-3 times lower stellar velocity dispersion per unit rotation speed at a given age than all but one observed disk galaxy, and most cosmological simulations match other galaxi...
Influence of Bar Formation on Star Formation Segregation and Stellar Migration: Implications for Variations in the Age Distribution of Milky Way Disk Stars
astro-ph.GA 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

Bar formation in a simulated Milky Way analog drives inner stars outward and shifts star formation, producing a predicted peak in the outer disk's stellar age distribution at the bar formation epoch.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

161 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

[1]

, " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

ENTRY address archiveprefix author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution eprint journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.all := #1 ...
[2]

write newline

" write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in " " * FUNCTION format....
[3]

2022, , 259, 35

Abdurro'uf , Accetta , K., Aerts , C., et al. 2022, , 259, 35

2022
[4]

2021, , 503, 5826

Agertz , O., Renaud , F., Feltzing , S., et al. 2021, , 503, 5826

2021
[5]

& Knapen , J

Alonso-Herrero , A. & Knapen , J. H. 2001, , 122, 1350

2001
[6]

D., Bania , T

Anderson , L. D., Bania , T. M., Balser , D. S., et al. 2014, , 212, 1

2014
[7]

Arifyanto , M. I. & Fuchs , B. 2006, , 449, 533

2006
[8]

P., Anderson , L

Armentrout , W. P., Anderson , L. D., Wenger , T. V., Balser , D. S., & Bania , T. M. 2021, , 253, 23

2021

Show all 161 references

[9]

R., & Wada , K

Baba , J., Saitoh , T. R., & Wada , K. 2013, , 763, 46

2013
[10]

2025, , 693, A3

Barbillon , M., Recio-Blanco , A., Poggio , E., et al. 2025, , 693, A3

2025
[11]

W., Koposov , S

Belokurov , V., Erkal , D., Evans , N. W., Koposov , S. E., & Deason , A. J. 2018, , 478, 611

2018
[12]

& Lin , C

Bertin , G. & Lin , C. C. 1996, Spiral structure in galaxies a density wave theory (Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press)

1996
[13]

E., Stark , A

Binney , J., Gerhard , O. E., Stark , A. A., Bally , J., & Uchida , K. I. 1991, , 252, 210

1991
[14]

& Tremaine , S

Binney , J. & Tremaine , S. 2008, Galactic Dynamics: Second Edition (Princeton University Press)

2008
[15]

C., Kazantzidis , S., & Weinberg , D

Bird , J. C., Kazantzidis , S., & Weinberg , D. H. 2012, , 420, 913

2012
[16]

& Gerhard , O

Bland-Hawthorn , J. & Gerhard , O. 2016, , 54, 529

2016
[17]

R., Bershady , M

Blanton , M. R., Bershady , M. A., Abolfathi , B., et al. 2017, , 154, 28

2017
[18]

& Spergel , D

Blitz , L. & Spergel , D. N. 1991, , 379, 631

1991
[19]

2013, , 553, A19

Boeche , C., Chiappini , C., Minchev , I., et al. 2013, , 553, A19

2013
[20]

2023, , 519, 5202

Boecker , A., Neumayer , N., Pillepich , A., et al. 2023, , 519, 5202

2023
[21]

& Combes , F

Bournaud , F. & Combes , F. 2002, , 392, 83

2002
[22]

& Combes , F

Bournaud , F. & Combes , F. 2003, , 401, 817

2003
[23]

2020, , 491, 5435

Buck , T. 2020, , 491, 5435

2020
[24]

V., Dutton , A

Buck , T., Macci \`o , A. V., Dutton , A. A., Obreja , A., & Frings , J. 2019, , 483, 1314

2019
[25]

K., Macci \`o , A

Buck , T., Ness , M. K., Macci \`o , A. V., Obreja , A., & Dutton , A. A. 2018, , 861, 88

2018
[26]

2023, , 523, 1565

Buck , T., Obreja , A., Ratcliffe , B., et al. 2023, , 523, 1565

2023
[27]

L., & Kawata , D

Carles , C., Martel , H., Ellison , S. L., & Kawata , D. 2016, , 463, 1074

2016
[28]

2019, , 490, 797

Carrillo , I., Minchev , I., Steinmetz , M., et al. 2019, , 490, 797

2019
[29]

J., Luri , X., et al

Castro-Ginard , A., McMillan , P. J., Luri , X., et al. 2021, , 652, A162

2021
[30]

2013, , 560, A59

Cedr \'e s , B., Cepa , J., Bongiovanni , \'A ., et al. 2013, , 560, A59

2013
[31]

& Beckman , J

Cepa , J. & Beckman , J. E. 1990, , 349, 497

1990
[32]

& Klypin , A

Ceverino , D. & Klypin , A. 2007, , 379, 1155

2007
[33]

2009, in The Galaxy Disk in Cosmological Context, ed

Chiappini , C. 2009, in The Galaxy Disk in Cosmological Context, ed. J. Andersen , Nordstr \"o ara , B. m , & J. Bland-Hawthorn , Vol. 254, 191--196

2009
[34]

2003, , 339, 63

Chiappini , C., Romano , D., & Matteucci , F. 2003, , 339, 63

2003
[35]

& Gadotti , D

Coelho , P. & Gadotti , D. A. 2011, , 743, L13

2011
[36]

1988, in NATO Advanced Study Institute (ASI) Series C, Vol

Combes , F. 1988, in NATO Advanced Study Institute (ASI) Series C, Vol. 232, Galactic and Extragalactic Star Formation, ed. R. E. Pudritz & M. Fich , 475

1988
[37]

1994, in Mass-Transfer Induced Activity in Galaxies, ed

Combes , F. 1994, in Mass-Transfer Induced Activity in Galaxies, ed. I. Shlosman , 170

1994
[38]

& Papayannopoulos , T

Contopoulos , G. & Papayannopoulos , T. 1980, , 92, 33

1980
[39]

Di Matteo , P., Haywood , M., Combes , F., Semelin , B., & Snaith , O. N. 2013, , 553, A102

2013
[40]

D., et al

Di Matteo , P., Haywood , M., Lehnert , M. D., et al. 2019 a , , 632, A4

2019
[41]

D., et al

Di Matteo , P., Haywood , M., Lehnert , M. D., et al. 2019 b , , 632, A4

2019
[42]

D., Comer \'o n , S., et al

D \' az-Garc \' a , S., Moyano , F. D., Comer \'o n , S., et al. 2020, , 644, A38

2020
[43]

2013, , 766, 34

D'Onghia , E., Vogelsberger , M., & Hernquist , L. 2013, , 766, 34

2013
[44]

J., Moore , T

Eden , D. J., Moore , T. J. T., Urquhart , J. S., et al. 2015, , 452, 289

2015
[45]

W., Rix , H.-W., & Ness , M

Eilers , A.-C., Hogg , D. W., Rix , H.-W., & Ness , M. K. 2019, , 871, 120

2019
[46]

L., Nair , P., Patton , D

Ellison , S. L., Nair , P., Patton , D. R., et al. 2011, , 416, 2182

2011
[47]

Elmegreen , B. G. & Elmegreen , D. M. 1986, , 311, 554

1986
[48]

2018, , 474, 5372

Erwin , P. 2018, , 474, 5372

2018
[49]

B., Frogel , J

Eskridge , P. B., Frogel , J. A., Pogge , R. W., et al. 2000, , 119, 536

2000
[50]

K., Bovy , J., Holtzman , J., et al

Feuillet , D. K., Bovy , J., Holtzman , J., et al. 2018, , 477, 2326

2018
[51]

W., Walter , F., & Leroy , A

Foyle , K., Rix , H. W., Walter , F., & Leroy , A. K. 2010, , 725, 534

2010
[52]

2018, , 616, A180

Fragkoudi , F., Di Matteo , P., Haywood , M., et al. 2018, , 616, A180

2018
[53]

2020, , 495, 4158

Fraser-McKelvie , A., Arag \'o n-Salamanca , A., Merrifield , M., et al. 2020, , 495, 4158

2020
[54]

& Bland-Hawthorn , J

Freeman , K. & Bland-Hawthorn , J. 2002, , 40, 487

2002
[55]

2023, , 674, A37

Gaia Collaboration , Drimmel , R., Romero-G \'o mez , M., et al. 2023, , 674, A37

2023
[56]

E., Allende Prieto , C., Holtzman , J

Garc \' a P \'e rez , A. E., Allende Prieto , C., Holtzman , J. A., et al. 2016, , 151, 144

2016
[57]

J., Lintott , C., et al

G \'e ron , T., Smethurst , R. J., Lintott , C., et al. 2023, , 521, 1775

2023
[58]

J., Lintott , C., et al

G \'e ron , T., Smethurst , R. J., Lintott , C., et al. 2021, , 507, 4389

2021
[59]

J., Lintott , C., et al

G \'e ron , T., Smethurst , R. J., Lintott , C., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.05960

2024 arXiv
[60]

Grand , R. J. J., Kawata , D., & Cropper , M. 2012 a , , 426, 167

2012
[61]

Grand , R. J. J., Kawata , D., & Cropper , M. 2012 b , , 421, 1529

2012
[62]

1972, in IAU Colloq

Grenon , M. 1972, in IAU Colloq. 17: Age des Etoiles, ed. G. Cayrel de Strobel & A. M. Delplace , 55

1972
[63]

2024, , 977, 143

Hackshaw , Z., Hawkins , K., Filion , C., et al. 2024, , 977, 143

2024
[64]

2018, , 616, A86

Halle , A., Di Matteo , P., Haywood , M., & Combes , F. 2018, , 616, A86

2018
[65]

D., et al

Haywood , M., Di Matteo , P., Lehnert , M. D., et al. 2018, , 863, 113

2018
[66]

2024, , 690, A147

Haywood , M., Khoperskov , S., Cerqui , V., et al. 2024, , 690, A147

2024
[67]

H., et al

Helmi , A., Babusiaux , C., Koppelman , H. H., et al. 2018, , 563, 85

2018
[68]

2020, , 497, 933

Hilmi , T., Minchev , I., Buck , T., et al. 2020, , 497, 933

2020
[69]

A., Shetrone , M., Johnson , J

Holtzman , J. A., Shetrone , M., Johnson , J. A., et al. 2015, , 150, 148

2015
[70]

A., et al

Imig , J., Price , C., Holtzman , J. A., et al. 2023, , 954, 124

2023
[71]

A., Allende Prieto , C., et al

J \"o nsson , H., Holtzman , J. A., Allende Prieto , C., et al. 2020, , 160, 120

2020
[72]

Kalnajs , A. J. 1973, , 2, 174

1973
[73]

G., Hakobyan , A

Karapetyan , A. G., Hakobyan , A. A., Barkhudaryan , L. V., et al. 2018, , 481, 566

2018
[74]

Kawata , D., Hunt , J. A. S., Grand , R. J. J., Pasetto , S., & Cropper , M. 2014, , 443, 2757

2014
[75]

1998, , 498, 541

Kennicutt , Robert C., J. 1998, , 498, 541

1998
[76]

R., Famaey , B., Monari , G., et al

Khalil , Y. R., Famaey , B., Monari , G., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.12800

2024 arXiv
[77]

Khoperskov , S., Di Matteo , P., Haywood , M., G \'o mez , A., & Snaith , O. N. 2020, , 638, A144

2020
[78]

& Gerhard , O

Khoperskov , S. & Gerhard , O. 2022, , 663, A38

2022
[79]

D., & Combes , F

Khoperskov , S., Haywood , M., Di Matteo , P., Lehnert , M. D., & Combes , F. 2018, , 609, A60

2018
[80]

2021, , 501, 5176

Khoperskov , S., Haywood , M., Snaith , O., et al. 2021, , 501, 5176

2021
[81]

2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.16866

Khoperskov , S., Steinmetz , M., Haywood , M., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.16866

2024 arXiv
[82]

H., Beckman , J

Knapen , J. H., Beckman , J. E., Cepa , J., & Nakai , N. 1996, , 308, 27

1996
[83]

2015, , 447, 3526

Kordopatis , G., Binney , J., Gilmore , G., et al. 2015, , 447, 3526

2015
[84]

2012, , 757, 60

Kraljic , K., Bournaud , F., & Martig , M. 2012, , 757, 60

2012
[85]

Leung , H. W. & Bovy , J. 2019, , 489, 2079

2019
[86]

S., Blitz , L., & Heiles , C

Levine , E. S., Blitz , L., & Heiles , C. 2006, Science, 312, 1773

2006
[87]

Lin , C. C. & Shu , F. H. 1964, , 140, 646

1964
[88]

2020, , 499, 1406

Lin , L., Li , C., Du , C., et al. 2020, , 499, 1406

2020
[89]

Lord , S. D. 1987, PhD thesis, UMass Amherst

1987
[90]

Lord , S. D. & Young , J. S. 1990, , 356, 135

1990
[91]

2022 a , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2212.04515

Lu , Y., Minchev , I., Buck , T., et al. 2022 a , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2212.04515

2022 arXiv
[92]

L., Ness , M

Lu , Y. L., Ness , M. K., Buck , T., & Carr , C. 2022 b , , 512, 4697

2022
[93]

Lucey , M., Pearson , S., Hunt , J. A. S., et al. 2023, , 520, 4779

2023
[94]

D., Fall , S

Ludlow , A. D., Fall , S. M., Schaye , J., & Obreschkow , D. 2021, , 508, 5114

2021
[95]

D., Fall , S

Ludlow , A. D., Fall , S. M., Wilkinson , M. J., Schaye , J., & Obreschkow , D. 2023, , 525, 5614

2023
[96]

Mackereth , J. T. & Bovy , J. 2018, , 130, 114501

2018
[97]

2020, , 495, 3840

Maeda , F., Ohta , K., Fujimoto , Y., Habe , A., & Ushio , K. 2020, , 495, 3840

2020
[98]

Majewski , S. R. e. a. 2017, , 154, 94

2017
[99]

& Jogee , S

Marinova , I. & Jogee , S. 2007, , 659, 1176

2007
[100]

J., Dekel , A., & Teyssier , R

Martig , M., Bournaud , F., Croton , D. J., Dekel , A., & Teyssier , R. 2012, , 756, 26

2012
[101]

2009, , 707, 250

Martig , M., Bournaud , F., Teyssier , R., & Dekel , A. 2009, , 707, 250

2009
[102]

2014 a , , 442, 2474

Martig , M., Minchev , I., & Flynn , C. 2014 a , , 442, 2474

2014
[103]

2014 b , , 443, 2452

Martig , M., Minchev , I., & Flynn , C. 2014 b , , 443, 2452

2014
[104]

H., & Scoville , N

Men \'e ndez-Delmestre , K., Sheth , K., Schinnerer , E., Jarrett , T. H., & Scoville , N. Z. 2007, , 657, 790

2007
[105]

2018, , 481, 1645

Minchev , I., Anders , F., Recio-Blanco , A., et al. 2018, , 481, 1645

2018
[106]

2013, , 558, A9

Minchev , I., Chiappini , C., & Martig , M. 2013, , 558, A9

2013
[107]

& Famaey , B

Minchev , I. & Famaey , B. 2010, , 722, 112

2010
[108]

2011, , 527, A147

Minchev , I., Famaey , B., Combes , F., et al. 2011, , 527, A147

2011
[109]

C., et al

Minchev , I., Famaey , B., Quillen , A. C., et al. 2012, , 548, A126

2012
[110]

& Quillen , A

Minchev , I. & Quillen , A. C. 2006, , 368, 623

2006
[111]

Moore , T. J. T., Urquhart , J. S., Morgan , L. K., & Thompson , M. A. 2012, , 426, 701

2012
[112]

1991, , 353, 140

Nakada , Y., Onaka , T., Yamamura , I., et al. 1991, , 353, 140

1991
[113]

2024, , 681, L8

Nepal , S., Chiappini , C., Guiglion , G., et al. 2024, , 681, L8

2024
[114]

2024, , 534, 2438

Neumann , J., Thomas , D., Maraston , C., et al. 2024, , 534, 2438

2024
[115]

Okalidis , P., Grand , R. J. J., Yates , R. M., & Springel , V. 2022, , 514, 5085

2022
[116]

Peters , III, W. L. 1975, , 195, 617

1975
[117]

S., Weinberg, M

Petersen, M. S., Weinberg, M. D., & Katz, N. 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 490, 3616–3632

2019
[118]

2021, , 651, A104

Poggio , E., Drimmel , R., Cantat-Gaudin , T., et al. 2021, , 651, A104

2021
[119]

A., et al

Poggio , E., Recio-Blanco , A., Palicio , P. A., et al. 2022, , 666, L4

2022
[120]

K., Meidt , S

Querejeta , M., Leroy , A. K., Meidt , S. E., et al. 2024, , 687, A293

2024
[121]

2021, , 656, A133

Querejeta , M., Schinnerer , E., Meidt , S., et al. 2021, , 656, A133

2021
[122]

C., Dougherty , J., Bagley , M

Quillen , A. C., Dougherty , J., Bagley , M. B., Minchev , I., & Comparetta , J. 2011, , 417, 762

2011
[123]

C., Minchev , I., Bland-Hawthorn , J., & Haywood , M

Quillen , A. C., Minchev , I., Bland-Hawthorn , J., & Haywood , M. 2009, , 397, 1599

2009
[124]

E., Moore , T

Ragan , S. E., Moore , T. J. T., Eden , D. J., et al. 2018, , 479, 2361

2018
[125]

2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.17326

Ratcliffe , B., Khoperskov , S., Minchev , I., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.17326

2024 arXiv
[126]

2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2305.13378

Ratcliffe , B., Minchev , I., Anders , F., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2305.13378

2023 arXiv
[127]

2012, , 757, 155

Rebolledo , D., Wong , T., Leroy , A., Koda , J., & Donovan Meyer , J. 2012, , 757, 155

2012
[128]

2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.10598

Renaud , F., Ratcliffe , B., Minchev , I., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.10598

2024 arXiv
[129]

& Downes , D

Reynaud , D. & Downes , D. 1998, , 337, 671

1998
[130]

2013, , 432, 2878

Roca-F \`a brega , S., Valenzuela , O., Figueras , F., et al. 2013, , 432, 2878

2013
[131]

P., Quinn , T

Ro s kar , R., Debattista , V. P., Quinn , T. R., Stinson , G. S., & Wadsley , J. 2008, , 684, L79

2008
[132]

K., Ishizuki , S., & Scoville , N

Sakamoto , K., Okumura , S. K., Ishizuki , S., & Scoville , N. Z. 1999, , 525, 691

1999
[133]

L., Kawata , D., Matsunaga , N., et al

Sanders , J. L., Kawata , D., Matsunaga , N., et al. 2024, , 530, 2972

2024
[134]

& Binney , J

Sch \"o nrich , R. & Binney , J. 2009, , 396, 203

2009
[135]

Seigar , M. S. & James , P. A. 2002, , 337, 1113

2002
[136]

Sellwood , J. A. 2013, , 769, L24

2013
[137]

Sellwood , J. A. & Binney , J. J. 2002, , 336, 785

2002
[138]

2021, , 500, 3750

Sestito , F., Buck , T., Starkenburg , E., et al. 2021, , 500, 3750

2021
[139]

M., Elmegreen , B

Sheth , K., Elmegreen , D. M., Elmegreen , B. G., et al. 2008, , 675, 1141

2008
[140]

2019, , 628, A38

Spitoni , E., Cescutti , G., Minchev , I., et al. 2019, , 628, A38

2019
[141]

Z., Udalski , A., Szyma \'N ski , M., et al

Stanek , K. Z., Udalski , A., Szyma \'N ski , M., et al. 1997, , 477, 163

1997
[142]

2006, , 373, 1074

Stinson , G., Seth , A., Katz , N., et al. 2006, , 373, 1074

2006
[143]

S., Brook , C., Macci \`o , A

Stinson , G. S., Brook , C., Macci \`o , A. V., et al. 2013, , 428, 129

2013
[144]

A., Imig , J., et al

Stone-Martinez , A., Holtzman , J. A., Imig , J., et al. 2024, , 167, 73

2024
[145]

Sun , B., Calzetti , D., & Battisti , A. J. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.07248

2024 arXiv
[146]

F., Tagger , M., Athanassoula , E., & Pellat , R

Sygnet , J. F., Tagger , M., Athanassoula , E., & Pellat , R. 1988, , 232, 733

1988
[147]

F., Athanassoula , E., & Pellat , R

Tagger , M., Sygnet , J. F., Athanassoula , E., & Pellat , R. 1987, , 318, L43

1987
[148]

2002, , 385, 337

Teyssier , R. 2002, , 385, 337

2002
[149]

& Kalnajs , A

Toomre , A. & Kalnajs , A. J. 1991, in Dynamics of Disc Galaxies, ed. B. Sundelius , 341

1991
[150]

2014, , 794, 173

Vera-Ciro , C., D'Onghia , E., Navarro , J., & Abadi , M. 2014, , 794, 173

2014
[151]

& Kobayashi , C

Vincenzo , F. & Kobayashi , C. 2020, , 496, 80

2020
[152]

2024, , 528, 3576

Vislosky , E., Minchev , I., Khoperskov , S., et al. 2024, , 528, 3576

2024
[153]

N., Kulkarni , S

Vogel , S. N., Kulkarni , S. R., & Scoville , N. Z. 1988, , 334, 402

1988
[154]

W., Keller , B

Wadsley , J. W., Keller , B. W., & Quinn , T. R. 2017, , 471, 2357

2017
[155]

2023, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, Vol

Wang , K., Carrillo , A., Ness , M., & Buck , T. 2023, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 241, American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, 208.02

2023
[156]

A., Stinson , G

Wang , L., Dutton , A. A., Stinson , G. S., et al. 2015, , 454, 83

2015
[157]

2011, , 411, 1409

Watanabe , Y., Sorai , K., Kuno , N., & Habe , A. 2011, , 411, 1409

2011
[158]

L., Arendt , R

Weiland , J. L., Arendt , R. G., Berriman , G. B., et al. 1994, , 425, L81

1994
[159]

J., Ludlow, A

Wilkinson, M. J., Ludlow, A. D., Lagos, C. d. P., et al. 2023, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 519, 5942–5961

2023
[160]

W., Kane , S

Zhang , H., Belokurov , V., Evans , N. W., Kane , S. G., & Sanders , J. L. 2024, [ [arXiv] 2406.06678 ]

2024 arXiv
[161]

E., & Knapen , J

Zurita , A., Rela \ n o , M., Beckman , J. E., & Knapen , J. H. 2004, , 413, 73

2004

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

, " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

ENTRY address archiveprefix author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution eprint journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.all := #1 ...

[2] [2]

write newline

" write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in " " * FUNCTION format....

[3] [3]

2022, , 259, 35

Abdurro'uf , Accetta , K., Aerts , C., et al. 2022, , 259, 35

2022

[4] [4]

2021, , 503, 5826

Agertz , O., Renaud , F., Feltzing , S., et al. 2021, , 503, 5826

2021

[5] [5]

& Knapen , J

Alonso-Herrero , A. & Knapen , J. H. 2001, , 122, 1350

2001

[6] [6]

D., Bania , T

Anderson , L. D., Bania , T. M., Balser , D. S., et al. 2014, , 212, 1

2014

[7] [7]

Arifyanto , M. I. & Fuchs , B. 2006, , 449, 533

2006

[8] [8]

P., Anderson , L

Armentrout , W. P., Anderson , L. D., Wenger , T. V., Balser , D. S., & Bania , T. M. 2021, , 253, 23

2021