Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 3 cited by

Two-beam Multiparticle Many-body simulations of Inhomogeneous FFI

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-05-22 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Many-body neutrino flavor simulations equilibrate earlier than mean-field models but reach similar final states.

desk verdict Tensor-network framework lets them compare inhomogeneous many-body neutrino flavor runs against mean-field under open and closed boundaries, with MB cases equilibrating earlier but separated beams giving different final states. read the letter →

arxiv 2511.16506 v1 pith:UJO2TGHV submitted 2025-11-20 astro-ph.HE

Zoha Laraib , Sherwood Richers This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords neutrinoflavorevolutionmany-bodysimulationfastinstabilitytensornetworkinhomogeneouscore-collapsesupernovaneutronstarmerger
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper presents a unified tensor-network framework for simulating many-body neutrino flavor evolution in inhomogeneous and anisotropic conditions relevant to supernovae and mergers. It finds that many-body systems equilibrate earlier than mean-field counterparts while approaching similar final flavor states. The work examines how inhomogeneity, boundary conditions, and initial beam setups affect dynamics, showing that larger interaction regions let open boundaries mimic closed systems when beams start together. Initially separated beams develop entanglement more slowly and reach different flavor content.

What carries the argument

Unified tensor-network framework enabling simulations of inhomogeneous neutrino flavor evolution.

What would settle it

A comparison run with substantially larger system sizes or smaller truncation error that yields markedly different equilibration times or final flavor states would falsify the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Within a unified tensor-network framework for inhomogeneous and anisotropic flavor evolution, many-body systems equilibrate earlier than their mean-field counterparts while approaching similar final flavor states. Enlarging the interaction region allows open boundaries to reproduce closed-system behavior when beams begin superimposed and interact continuously, but initially separated configurations develop entanglement more slowly and equilibrate to different flavor content.

Load-bearing premise

The tensor-network truncation and chosen system sizes sufficiently capture the full many-body entanglement dynamics without introducing artifacts that alter the reported equilibration times or final states.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Many-body systems reach equilibrium on shorter timescales than mean-field approximations.
  • Open boundary conditions reproduce closed-system results when the interaction region is enlarged and beams start superimposed.
  • Initially separated beam configurations interact over longer times and end at different flavor states.
  • Resolution convergence can be directly compared across multiple neutrino distributions in one consistent setup.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extending the framework to three spatial dimensions could expose additional effects from realistic supernova inhomogeneities.
  • Faster many-body equilibration might shift the predicted timing of flavor conversion in observable neutrino signals from mergers.
  • Applying similar tensor-network methods to other dense quantum systems could test whether the equilibration speedup is general.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a unified tensor-network framework for many-body simulations of inhomogeneous and anisotropic neutrino flavor evolution in two-beam setups relevant to core-collapse supernovae and neutron-star mergers. It enables larger systems with open boundaries and direct comparisons to mean-field results, reporting that many-body systems equilibrate earlier than mean-field counterparts while approaching similar final flavor states. The work also examines effects of initial beam configurations (superimposed vs. separated), boundary conditions, and resolution convergence on entanglement growth and equilibration.

Significance. If converged, the framework represents a technical advance over prior many-body studies limited to small closed systems or high symmetry, allowing more astrophysically relevant inhomogeneous configurations. The direct MB-MF comparison under consistent numerics and the reported earlier MB equilibration could inform neutrino transport modeling if the tensor-network results prove robust to truncation.

major comments (2)
  1. [Convergence and Methods] The convergence section reports tests with spatial resolution but does not include explicit bond-dimension scaling studies for the equilibration time and final flavor content metrics, especially in initially-separated beam configurations where the abstract notes slower entanglement development. This is load-bearing for the central claim, as insufficient bond dimension can suppress long-range correlations and artificially accelerate relaxation toward mean-field-like states.
  2. [Results on Equilibration] The headline result that many-body systems equilibrate earlier than mean-field while reaching similar final states (abstract and results section) assumes the tensor-network ansatz faithfully captures the full entanglement dynamics under inhomogeneity and open boundaries. Without bond-dimension convergence data tied to these observables, it remains unclear whether the reported time difference is physical or truncation-induced.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Clarify in the abstract and methods whether 'convergence with resolution' encompasses tensor bond dimension or refers only to spatial discretization.
  2. [Figures] Ensure figure captions explicitly label MB versus MF curves, initial beam separations, and boundary conditions for all panels.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough and constructive review of our manuscript. The comments on convergence are well taken and highlight an important aspect for validating the tensor-network results. We address each major comment below and have prepared revisions to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Convergence and Methods] The convergence section reports tests with spatial resolution but does not include explicit bond-dimension scaling studies for the equilibration time and final flavor content metrics, especially in initially-separated beam configurations where the abstract notes slower entanglement development. This is load-bearing for the central claim, as insufficient bond dimension can suppress long-range correlations and artificially accelerate relaxation toward mean-field-like states.

    Authors: We agree that explicit bond-dimension scaling studies are necessary to confirm robustness, particularly for the separated-beam case with slower entanglement growth. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated convergence subsection (or appendix) that presents bond-dimension scaling for both equilibration timescales and final flavor content. These studies will be performed for the bond dimensions employed in the main results and will demonstrate that the reported differences remain stable under increased bond dimension. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results on Equilibration] The headline result that many-body systems equilibrate earlier than mean-field while reaching similar final states (abstract and results section) assumes the tensor-network ansatz faithfully captures the full entanglement dynamics under inhomogeneity and open boundaries. Without bond-dimension convergence data tied to these observables, it remains unclear whether the reported time difference is physical or truncation-induced.

    Authors: We acknowledge that directly linking bond-dimension convergence to the key observables strengthens the central claim. The revised manuscript will include bond-dimension scaling plots specifically for the many-body versus mean-field equilibration time difference and final states. These additional data will show that the earlier equilibration observed in the many-body simulations persists across a range of bond dimensions, indicating that the effect is not an artifact of truncation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: results from direct numerical evolution

full rationale

The paper reports outcomes of tensor-network simulations comparing many-body and mean-field neutrino flavor evolution under inhomogeneous conditions. The central claims (earlier MB equilibration, similar final states) are direct numerical results from evolving the system under the stated ansatz, initial conditions, and boundaries. No step fits parameters to a data subset then renames the output as a prediction, defines quantities in terms of each other, or relies on a self-citation chain for the load-bearing result. The derivation chain is the simulation procedure itself, which is independent of the reported observables.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The framework assumes the tensor-network representation faithfully encodes the relevant many-body correlations for the neutrino distributions studied; no explicit free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption Tensor-network ansatz captures essential entanglement structure of the inhomogeneous neutrino system.
    Invoked to justify the simulation method for many-body flavor evolution.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Two-beam Multiparticle Many-body simulations of Inhomogeneous FFI." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UJO2TGHV

@misc{pith2026251116506,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Two-beam Multiparticle Many-body simulations of Inhomogeneous FFI},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UJO2TGHV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2511.16506}
}
read the original abstract

Neutrino flavor evolution in dense astrophysical environments is inherently nonlinear and sensitive to many-body (MB) quantum effects beyond the mean-field (MF) approximation. Existing MB studies are constrained by small system sizes, closed boundaries, and highly idealized symmetry assumptions. We present a unified tensor-network framework that enables simulations of inhomogeneous and anisotropic flavor evolution under conditions relevant to core-collapse supernovae and neutron-star mergers. Within this framework, we examine the effects of inhomogeneity, boundary conditions, and convergence with resolution for multiple neutrino distributions, allowing direct comparison of these setups under one consistent formulation. In our simulations, many-body systems equilibrate earlier than their mean-field counterparts while approaching similar final flavor states. Enlarging the interaction region allows open boundaries to reproduce closed-system behavior, but only when the beams begin superimposed and interact continuously. By contrast, initially separated configurations develop entanglement more slowly, interact over longer times, and equilibrate to a flavor content that differs from that obtained from initially superimposed calculations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.16506 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Homogeneous two-flavor two-beam fast flavor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Inhomogeneous two-flavor, two-beam 20-particle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Time evolution of the polarization vector components [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Evolution of the polarization vector components [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Time evolution for a 20-particle system under [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Time evolution of the average flavor coherence for a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Time evolution of a flavor-symmetric [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Vacuum oscillation test. Plotted here is the evolution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: Exponential growth of average single-site flavor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: Mean-field inhomogeneous FFI growth rate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_12.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Once again, our method is able to reproduce the pat￾terns resulting from the relative size of the vacuum and self￾interaction potentials [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_14.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Improved Approximations for Collective Neutrino Oscillations

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Second-order BBGKY truncation of an su(n) one-plus-two-body Hamiltonian approximates collective neutrino dynamics beyond mean field at polynomial classical cost and reveals large-N phase and entanglement structure.

  2. Collective neutrino oscillations: Many-body non-forward effects and non-classicality

    hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    In a neutrino-gas model, the many-body Hamiltonian yields different evolution timescales and asymptotics than the quantum kinetic approach with collisions, while quantum resources for the full case sit at the low end ...

  3. Neutrino helicity oscillations in astrophysical environments: a many-body approach

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Many-body neutrino calculations in simple momentum-state configurations yield helicity conversion probabilities orders of magnitude above mean-field results due to momentum exchange.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 82 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    The Role of Inhomogeneity It is well understood that inhomogeneity allows modes of nonzero wavenumber to grow in the mean-field limit, but since the many-body depolarization is not a fast flavor insta- bility, it is natural to wonder what role inhomogeneity has in many-body depolarization. We ran a modified version of the inhomogeneous Symmetric simulatio...

    work page

  2. [2]

    We further explore the effect of flavor asymmetry in a two-beam model (Fig

    Flavor Asymmetry So far, all of our simulations have explored the special case of a Symmetric FFI when there are equal initial numbers of electron and muon neutrinos. We further explore the effect of flavor asymmetry in a two-beam model (Fig. 4), where the number of electron neutrinos and similarly the number of electron neutrino sites is twice that of mu...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Finite Bond Dimension The infinite bond dimension calculations contain numerical errors associated with the spatial discretization and the size of the timestep, but retained all entanglement information in the quantum state. We investigate the convergence of many-body neutrino evolution simulations with respect tobond dimension (BD) in a 20-particle syste...

    work page

  4. [4]

    To probe how these simplifications influence the dynamics, we system- atically relax each of these assumptions, beginning with the role of boundary conditions

    Open vs Closed systems Existing many-body (MB) studies of collective neutrino oscillations are typically constrained by closed (periodic) boundaries and idealized symmetry assumptions. To probe how these simplifications influence the dynamics, we system- atically relax each of these assumptions, beginning with the role of boundary conditions. Our first qu...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Superimposed vs. Separated Initial Conditions The above simulations of the MB system with open bound- ary conditions assumed that neutrinos begin superimposed with no flavor coherence or many-body entanglement. How- ever, it is not clear that this assumption is a good represen- tation of the behavior of neutrinos in astrophysical environ- ments, since neu...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Janka, Explosion Mechanisms of Core-Collapse Super- novae, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science62, 407 (2012)

    H.-T. Janka, Explosion Mechanisms of Core-Collapse Super- novae, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science62, 407 (2012)

    work page 2012

  7. [7]

    Mezzacappa, P

    A. Mezzacappa, P. Marronetti, R. E. Landfield, E. J. Lentz, R. D. Murphy, W. Raphael Hix, J. A. Harris, S. W. Bruenn, J. M. Blondin, O. Bronson Messer, J. Casanova, and L. L. Kro- nzer, Core collapse supernova gravitational wave emission for progenitors of 9.6, 15, and 25 Solar Masses, Physical Review D 107, 043008 (2023), publisher: American Physical Society

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Foucart, Neutrino transport in general relativistic neutron star merger simulations, Living Reviews in Computational Astro- physics9, 1 (2023)

    F. Foucart, Neutrino transport in general relativistic neutron star merger simulations, Living Reviews in Computational Astro- physics9, 1 (2023)

    work page 2023

Show all 82 references
  1. [9]

    Burrows and D

    A. Burrows and D. Vartanyan, Core-collapse supernova explo- sion theory, Nature589, 29 (2021)

    2021

  2. [10]

    Qian and S

    Y .-Z. Qian and S. E. Woosley, Nucleosynthesis in neutrino- driven winds. i. the physical conditions, Astrophys. J.471, 331 (1996)

    1996

  3. [11]

    Wang and R

    X. Wang and R. Surman, Neutrinos and heavy element nucle- osynthesis, inHandbook of Nuclear Physics(Springer, 2022) pp. 1–19

    2022

  4. [12]

    Fischer, G

    T. Fischer, G. Guo, K. Langanke, G. Martínez-Pinedo, Y .- Z. Qian, and M.-R. Wu, Neutrinos and nucleosynthesis of el- ements, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics , 104107 (2024)

    2024

  5. [13]

    Wolfenstein, Neutrino oscillations in matter, inSolar neutri- nos(CRC Press, 2018) pp

    L. Wolfenstein, Neutrino oscillations in matter, inSolar neutri- nos(CRC Press, 2018) pp. 294–299

    2018

  6. [14]

    Mikheyev and A

    S. Mikheyev and A. Y . Smirnov, Resonant neutrino oscilla- tions in matter, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics23, 41 (1989)

    1989

  7. [15]

    Pantaleone, Neutrino oscillations at high densities, Physics Letters B287, 128 (1992)

    J. Pantaleone, Neutrino oscillations at high densities, Physics Letters B287, 128 (1992)

    1992

  8. [16]

    H. Duan, G. M. Fuller, and Y .-Z. Qian, Collective neutrino os- cillations, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science60, 569 (2010)

    2010

  9. [17]

    Tamborra and S

    I. Tamborra and S. Shalgar, New developments in flavor evo- lution of a dense neutrino gas, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science71, 165 (2021)

    2021

  10. [18]

    Capozzi and N

    F. Capozzi and N. Saviano, Neutrino flavor conversions in high- density astrophysical and cosmological environments, Universe 8, 94 (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    Richers and M

    S. Richers and M. Sen, Fast Flavor Transformations, inHand- book of Nuclear Physics(Springer, Singapore, 2022)

    2022

  12. [20]

    Johns, S

    L. Johns, S. Richers, and M.-R. Wu, Neutrino oscillations in core-collapse supernovae and neutron star mergers, Annual Re- view of Nuclear and Particle Science75(2025)

    2025

  13. [21]

    M. C. V olpe, Neutrinos from dense environments: Flavor mech- anisms, theoretical approaches, observations, and new direc- tions, Reviews of Modern Physics96, 025004 (2024)

    2024

  14. [22]

    R. F. Sawyer, Speed-up of neutrino transformations in a super- nova environment, Physical Review D72, 045003 (2005)

    2005

  15. [23]

    Banerjee, A

    A. Banerjee, A. Dighe, and G. Raffelt, Linearized flavor- stability analysis of dense neutrino streams, Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology84, 053013 (2011)

    2011

  16. [24]

    Dasgupta, A

    B. Dasgupta, A. Mirizzi, and M. Sen, Fast neutrino flavor con- versions near the supernova core with realistic flavor-dependent angular distributions, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2017(02), 019

  17. [25]

    D. F. Fiorillo, G. G. Raffelt, and G. Sigl, Inhomogeneous ki- netic equation for mixed neutrinos: tracing the missing energy, Physical Review Letters133, 021002 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    Shalgar and I

    S. Shalgar and I. Tamborra, Breaking the symmetries in self- interacting neutrino systems: Fast conversions and directional crossings, Phys. Rev. D103, 063002 (2021)

    2021

  19. [27]

    A. V . Patwardhan, M. J. Cervia, E. Rrapaj, P. Siwach, and A. B. Balantekin, Many-body collective neutrino oscillations: Recent developments, Handbook of nuclear physics , 1 (2022)

    2022

  20. [28]

    Balantekin, M

    A. Balantekin, M. J. Cervia, A. V . Patwardhan, E. Rrapaj, and P. Siwach, Quantum information and quantum simulation of neutrino physics, The European Physical Journal A59, 186 (2023)

    2023

  21. [29]

    Raffelt and D

    G. Raffelt and D. d. S. Seixas, Neutrino flavor pendulum in both mass hierarchies, Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravi- tation, and Cosmology88, 045031 (2013)

    2013

  22. [30]

    R. S. Hansen and S. Hannestad, Chaotic flavor evolution in an interacting neutrino gas, Physical Review D90, 025009 (2014)

    2014

  23. [31]

    Chakraborty, R

    S. Chakraborty, R. S. Hansen, I. Izaguirre, and G. Raffelt, Self-induced flavor conversion of supernova neutrinos on small scales, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2016 (01), 028

  24. [32]

    Duan and S

    H. Duan and S. Shalgar, Flavor instabilities in the neutrino line model, Physics Letters B747, 139 (2015)

    2015

  25. [33]

    Abbar, H

    S. Abbar, H. Duan, S. Shalgar,et al., Flavor instabilities in the multiangle neutrino line model, Physical Review D92, 065019 (2015)

    2015

  26. [34]

    Mangano, A

    G. Mangano, A. Mirizzi, and N. Saviano, Damping the neutrino flavor pendulum by breaking homogeneity, Physical Review D 89, 073017 (2014)

    2014

  27. [35]

    Mirizzi, G

    A. Mirizzi, G. Mangano, and N. Saviano, Self-induced flavor instabilities of a dense neutrino stream in a two-dimensional model, Physical Review D92, 021702 (2015)

    2015

  28. [36]

    N. F. Bell, A. A. Rawlinson, and R. Sawyer, Speed-up through entanglement—many-body effects in neutrino pro- cesses, Physics Letters B573, 86 (2003)

    2003

  29. [37]

    Friedland and C

    A. Friedland and C. Lunardini, Do many-particle neutrino inter- actions cause a novel coherent effect?, Journal of High Energy Physics2003, 043 (2003)

    2003

  30. [38]

    Balantekin and Y

    A. Balantekin and Y . Pehlivan, Neutrino–neutrino interactions and flavour mixing in dense matter, Journal of Physics G: Nu- clear and Particle Physics34, 47 (2006)

    2006

  31. [39]

    A. V . Patwardhan, M. J. Cervia, E. Rrapaj, P. Siwach, and A. B. Balantekin, Many-body collective neutrino oscillations: recent developments, inHandbook of Nuclear Physics(Springer, Sin- gapore, 2023) pp. 1–16, 10.1007/978-981-15-8818-1_126-1

    2023 doi

  32. [40]

    Roggero, Entanglement and many-body effects in collective neutrino oscillations, Physical Review D104, 103016 (2021)

    A. Roggero, Entanglement and many-body effects in collective neutrino oscillations, Physical Review D104, 103016 (2021)

    2021

  33. [41]

    Roggero, Dynamical phase transitions in models of col- lective neutrino oscillations, Physical Review D104, 123023 (2021)

    A. Roggero, Dynamical phase transitions in models of col- lective neutrino oscillations, Physical Review D104, 123023 (2021)

    2021

  34. [42]

    Roggero, E

    A. Roggero, E. Rrapaj, and Z. Xiong, Entanglement and cor- relations in fast collective neutrino flavor oscillations, Physical Review D106, 043022 (2022)

    2022

  35. [43]

    J. D. Martin, D. Neill, A. Roggero, H. Duan, and J. Carlson, Equilibration of quantum many-body fast neutrino flavor oscil- 12 lations, Physical Review D108, 123010 (2023)

    2023

  36. [44]

    Illa and M

    M. Illa and M. J. Savage, Multi-neutrino entanglement and cor- relations in dense neutrino systems, Physical Review Letters 130, 221003 (2023)

    2023

  37. [45]

    Bhaskar, A

    R. Bhaskar, A. Roggero, and M. J. Savage, Timescales in many- body fast-neutrino-flavor conversion, Physical Review C110, 045801 (2024)

    2024

  38. [46]

    M. J. Cervia, P. Siwach, A. V . Patwardhan, A. Balantekin, S. Coppersmith, and C. W. Johnson, Collective neutrino oscil- lations with tensor networks using a time-dependent variational principle, Physical Review D105, 123025 (2022)

    2022

  39. [47]

    Shalgar and I

    S. Shalgar and I. Tamborra, Do we have enough evidence to invalidate the mean-field approximation adopted to model col- lective neutrino oscillations?, Physical Review D107, 123004 (2023)

    2023

  40. [48]

    A. Kost, L. Johns, and H. Duan, Once-in-a-lifetime encounter models for neutrino media: From coherent oscillations to flavor equilibration, Physical Review D109, 103037 (2024)

    2024

  41. [49]

    Johns, Neutrino many-body correlations, arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.04916 (2023)

    L. Johns, Neutrino many-body correlations, arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.04916 (2023)

    2023

  42. [50]

    Cirigliano, S

    V . Cirigliano, S. Sen, and Y . Yamauchi, Neutrino many-body flavor evolution: The full hamiltonian, Physical Review D110, 123028 (2024)

    2024

  43. [51]

    Goimil-García, S

    M. Goimil-García, S. Shalgar, and I. Tamborra, Pauli blocking: Probing beyond-mean-field effects in neutrino flavor evolution, Physical Review D111, 083054 (2025)

    2025

  44. [52]

    V olpe, D

    C. V olpe, D. Väänänen, and C. Espinoza, Extended evolution equations for neutrino propagation<? format?> in astrophysical and cosmological environments, Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology87, 113010 (2013)

    2013

  45. [53]

    M. J. Cervia, P. Siwach, A. V . Patwardhan, A. Balantekin, S. Coppersmith, and C. W. Johnson, Collective neutrino os- cillations with tensor networks using a time-dependent vari- ational principle, Physical Review D105, 10.1103/phys- revd.105.123025 (2022)

    2022 doi

  46. [54]

    Siwach, A

    P. Siwach, A. M. Suliga, and A. B. Balantekin, Entanglement in three-flavor collective neutrino oscillations, Physical Review D107, 10.1103/physrevd.107.023019 (2023)

    2023 doi

  47. [55]

    Laraib and S

    Z. Laraib and S. Richers, Many-body simulations of the fast flavor instability, arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.02040 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Fishman, S

    M. Fishman, S. White, and E. M. Stoudenmire, The itensor soft- ware library for tensor network calculations, SciPost Physics Codebases , 004 (2022)

    2022

  49. [57]

    Fishman, S

    M. Fishman, S. White, and E. M. Stoudenmire, Codebase re- lease 0.3 for itensor, SciPost Physics Codebases , 004 (2022)

    2022

  50. [58]

    Vidal, Efficient classical simulation of slightly entangled quantum computations, Physical review letters91, 147902 (2003)

    G. Vidal, Efficient classical simulation of slightly entangled quantum computations, Physical review letters91, 147902 (2003)

    2003

  51. [59]

    Vidal, Efficient simulation of one-dimensional quantum many-body systems, Physical review letters93, 040502 (2004)

    G. Vidal, Efficient simulation of one-dimensional quantum many-body systems, Physical review letters93, 040502 (2004)

    2004

  52. [60]

    Vidal, Classical simulation of infinite-size quantum lattice systems in one spatial dimension, Physical review letters98, 070201 (2007)

    G. Vidal, Classical simulation of infinite-size quantum lattice systems in one spatial dimension, Physical review letters98, 070201 (2007)

    2007

  53. [61]

    Verstraete, V

    F. Verstraete, V . Murg, and J. I. Cirac, Matrix product states, projected entangled pair states, and variational renormalization group methods for quantum spin systems, Advances in physics 57, 143 (2008)

    2008

  54. [62]

    Paeckel, T

    S. Paeckel, T. Köhler, A. Swoboda, S. R. Manmana, U. Scholl- wöck, and C. Hubig, Time-evolution methods for matrix- product states, Annals of Physics411, 167998 (2019)

    2019

  55. [63]

    Schollwöck, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Annals of physics326, 96 (2011)

    U. Schollwöck, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Annals of physics326, 96 (2011)

    2011

  56. [64]

    M. J. Cervia, A. V . Patwardhan, A. B. Balantekin, S. N. Cop- persmith, and C. W. Johnson, Entanglement and collective fla- vor oscillations in a dense neutrino gas, Physical Review D100, 083001 (2019)

    2019

  57. [65]

    A. V . Patwardhan, M. J. Cervia, and A. B. Balantekin, Spectral splits and entanglement entropy in collective neutrino oscilla- tions, Physical Review D104, 123035 (2021)

    2021

  58. [66]

    Chakraborty, R

    S. Chakraborty, R. S. Hansen, I. Izaguirre, and G. G. Raffelt, Self-induced neutrino flavor conversion without flavor mixing, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2016(03), 042

  59. [67]

    Richers, D

    S. Richers, D. E. Willcox, N. M. Ford, and A. Myers, Particle- in-cell simulation of the neutrino fast flavor instability, Physical Review D103, 083013 (2021)

    2021

  60. [68]

    J. D. Martin, A. Roggero, H. Duan, J. Carlson, and V . Cirigliano, Classical and quantum evolution in a simple coherent neutrino problem, Physical Review D105, 083020 (2022)

    2022

  61. [69]

    J. D. Martin, A. Roggero, H. Duan, and J. Carlson, Many-body neutrino flavor entanglement in a simple dynamic model, arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.07049 (2023)

    2023

  62. [70]

    Balantekin, Quantum entanglement and neutrino many-body systems, inJournal of Physics: Conference Series, V ol

    A. Balantekin, Quantum entanglement and neutrino many-body systems, inJournal of Physics: Conference Series, V ol. 2191 (IOP Publishing, 2022) p. 012004

    2022

  63. [71]

    Rrapaj, Exact solution of multiangle quantum many-body collective neutrino-flavor oscillations, Physical Review C101, 065805 (2020)

    E. Rrapaj, Exact solution of multiangle quantum many-body collective neutrino-flavor oscillations, Physical Review C101, 065805 (2020)

    2020

  64. [72]

    Xiong, Many-body effects of collective neutrino oscillations, Physical Review D105, 103002 (2022)

    Z. Xiong, Many-body effects of collective neutrino oscillations, Physical Review D105, 103002 (2022)

    2022

  65. [73]

    Bhattacharyya and B

    S. Bhattacharyya and B. Dasgupta, Fast flavor depolarization of supernova neutrinos, Physical Review Letters126, 061302 (2021)

    2021

  66. [74]

    Izaguirre, G

    I. Izaguirre, G. Raffelt, and I. Tamborra, Fast pairwise conver- sion of supernova neutrinos: A dispersion relation approach, Physical review letters118, 021101 (2017)

    2017

  67. [75]

    R. F. Sawyer, Neutrino cloud instabilities just above the neu- trino sphere of a supernova, Physical Review Letters116, 081101 (2016)

    2016

  68. [76]

    Padilla-Gay, H.-H

    I. Padilla-Gay, H.-H. Chen, S. Abbar, M.-R. Wu, and Z. Xiong, Flavor equilibration of supernova neutrinos: Exploring the dy- namics of slow modes, Physical Review D112, 043039 (2025)

    2025

  69. [77]

    M. J. Cervia, Interactions of neutrino wave packets, arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.22005 (2025)

    2025

  70. [78]

    Hannestad, G

    S. Hannestad, G. G. Raffelt, G. Sigl, and Y . Y . Wong, Self- induced conversion in dense neutrino gases: Pendulum in flavor space, Physical Review D74, 105010 (2006). Appendix A: Mean field tests

    2006

  71. [79]

    We set 𝑁𝑖 =0for each site𝑖such that the self-interaction Hamiltonian is zero

    Vacuum Oscillations We evolve a collection of six neutrinos, half of which start in the|𝜈 𝜇⟩state and the other half of which start in the|𝜈 𝑒⟩ state, i.e.,|Ψ 0⟩= Ë(𝑁 sites/2) 𝑛=1 | ↓⟩ ⊗ Ë(𝑁 sites/2) 𝑚=1 | ↑⟩ . We set 𝑁𝑖 =0for each site𝑖such that the self-interaction Hamiltoni...

  72. [80]

    We use neutrino masses of𝑚 1 =8.50×10 −3 eVand 𝑚2 =0 eV, corresponding to the inverted mass ordering, and set the mixing angle to𝜃 12 =0.01

    Bipolar Oscillations We reproduce homogeneous and isotropic bipolar oscilla- tions introduced in [73] with parameters matching those of [62]. We use neutrino masses of𝑚 1 =8.50×10 −3 eVand 𝑚2 =0 eV, corresponding to the inverted mass ordering, and set the mixing angle to𝜃 12 =...

  73. [81]

    10: An isotropic one-zone bipolar oscillation test using two counter-propagating beams

    Symmetric Fast Flavor Instability Convergence We check resolution requirements for resolving the lin- ear growth phase of the fast flavor instability and display 0 1 2 3 4 5 t/τbipolar □1.0 □0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 Pz,i i = 1 i = 2 FIG. 10: An isotropic one-zone bipolar oscillation te...

  74. [82]

    In particular, we investigate whether the solver maintains the expected scaling with𝑁 sites when applied to flavor-asymmetric initial conditions in a closed, superim- posed setup

    Asymmetric MF evolution and convergence behavior Building on the observed convergence of open-boundary systems toward closed-system MB behavior for superimposed configurations, we next re-assess the numerical consistency of our MF framework. In particular, we investigate wheth...

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed May 22, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.