pith. sign in

arxiv: 1705.03292 · v1 · pith:UKKS23XZnew · submitted 2017-05-09 · ⚛️ physics.med-ph

Comparison of CPMG and Uhrig Dynamic Decoupling (UDD) for tissue refocusing in MRI

classification ⚛️ physics.med-ph
keywords cpmgdecouplingdynamicmagneticnoiseobtainedrefocusingresults
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Two different dynamic decoupling strategies, the classic CPMG and the more recently proposed UDD protocol are compared in the context of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Both sequences were implemented on a 3T human MRI system and relaxometry was performed for a variety of tissue-mimicking agar and agarose gels. We find that CPMG provides moderately better decoupling than \UDD. The results are consistent with experimental noise spectra obtained from \textit{in vivo} spectroscopy results, which suggest that the type of noise spectra obtained would favor \CPMG. Theoretical coherence pathway analysis further suggests that \UDD\ is more susceptible to systematic errors due to static magnetic and radio-frequency field inhomogeneity or imperfect excitation and refocusing pulse profiles.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.