Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 35 references

Violation of Luttinger's theorem in one-dimensional interacting fermions

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read In a one-dimensional interacting metal, the Luttinger theorem can fail while the system stays metallic.

desk verdict Plausible evidence for Luttinger-sum-rule violation in a 1D metal, but the central sign structure is extracted at a single damping and never extrapolated to η→0, leaving the main claim not yet secure. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.04064 v2 pith:UKLAMKQY submitted 2025-06-04 cond-mat.str-el

Meng Gao , Yin Zhong This is my paper
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords Luttingertheoremintegralnon-Luttingerliquidt-t'-VmodeldensitymatrixrenormalizationgroupGreen'sfunctionzerosparticle-holesymmetryone-dimensionalfermions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that the Luttinger theorem, the rule that the volume enclosed by the Fermi surface fixes the particle density, can break down in a one-dimensional metal without the system becoming an insulator. Using density matrix renormalization group calculations on the one-dimensional generalized t-t'-V model on 102-site chains, the authors track the real part of the zero-frequency Green's function ReG(k,0) across fillings and interaction strengths. In the weakly interacting Luttinger liquid, ReG(k,0) changes sign through a singularity at the Fermi momentum and the Luttinger integral equals the particle density. Near half-filling at strong coupling, that singularity is progressively destroyed and smooth zero crossings appear away from the original Fermi momentum, so the Luttinger integral no longer matches the density. The paper presents this as a distinct metallic non-Luttinger liquid phase beyond the Luttinger liquid paradigm, with the breakdown driven by interaction-driven evolution of excitation modes together with particle-hole symmetry breaking.

What carries the argument

The central object is the zero-frequency single-particle Green's function ReG(k,0) and the sign structure that defines the Luttinger integral I_L = ∫ θ(ReG(k,0)) dk/(2π). The argument works by classifying the sign changes of this function: singular changes through poles or branch cuts are topologically protected and preserve the Luttinger theorem, while smooth zero crossings can drift when particle-hole symmetry is broken, changing the value of the integral. The paper tracks these features with DMRG, using the correction-vector method to obtain momentum-resolved Green's functions, and verifies that the zero crossings coincide with divergences of the self-energy, which signals the loss of a perturbative Fermi-liquid description.

What would settle it

Recompute ReG(k,0) for the same 102-site chain at n = 0.48 and V = 10t with damping factors eta = 0.02t, 0.01t, 0.005t, and smaller, tracking the zero-crossing momenta and the difference I_L - n. If the zero crossings move toward k_F and I_L approaches n as eta decreases, the claimed non-Luttinger liquid phase is an artifact of the finite broadening; if the zero crossings and I_L remain stable, the violation is confirmed.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that in the strong-coupling regime near half-filling of the one-dimensional t-t'-V model with next-nearest-neighbor hopping, the zero-frequency Green's function ReG(k,0) loses its singular sign change at the Fermi momentum and instead develops smooth zero crossings at momenta k_L that drift away from k_F as the interaction V/t grows. Because the Luttinger integral I_L is defined by the sign of ReG(k,0), these drifting zeros change I_L so that it no longer equals the particle density n, violating Luttinger's theorem in a metallic state. The paper identifies three regimes: a Luttinger liquid where the theorem holds, a non-Luttinger liquid near half-filling at strong coupling where it fails, and a half-filled charge-density-wave insulator where low-energy states are suppressed. It further argues that the failure is not caused by zeros alone, since a half-filled system with particle-hole symmetry can have zeros and still satisfy the theorem; the essential ingredient is the absence of both topological protection and particle-hole symmetry, which allows zero crossings to move without constraint.

Load-bearing premise

The sign pattern of ReG(k,0) that defines the zero crossings and the Luttinger integral is read from spectra computed with a fixed damping factor eta = 0.05t, and if that sign pattern changes as eta tends to zero, the reported violation of Luttinger's theorem could be a broadening artifact rather than a physical property of the exact Green's function.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In the non-Luttinger liquid phase near half-filling, the conventional Luttinger liquid diagnostics, such as power-law singularities in the momentum distribution and the 2k_F peak in the density correlations, become obscured or disappear, so the phase should be identified through smooth zero crossings of ReG(k,0) with suppressed spectral weight.
  • The deviation of the Luttinger integral from the particle density grows with interaction strength and with the particle-hole asymmetry parameter t'/t, and is reported to follow a power-law relation with t'/t, giving a quantitative marker that can be extrapolated to the thermodynamic limit.
  • At exact half-filling, the system can become a charge-density-wave insulator while the Luttinger theorem remains valid if particle-hole symmetry is restored, showing that the breakdown of the theorem is not tied to the insulating character of the state but to the symmetry and topology of the Green's function's zero structure.
  • The existence of a metallic non-Luttinger liquid phase in one dimension implies that a smooth momentum distribution near the Fermi momentum does not by itself guarantee a Luttinger liquid, so future numerical or experimental studies should check the zero-frequency Green's function rather than relying only on the momentum distribution.
  • The k_L momentum at which ReG(k,0) crosses zero provides a finite-size-extrapolated observable that can be tracked as a function of V/t, and its power-law dependence on the asymmetry parameter offers a concrete prediction for when Luttinger's theorem fails.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural experimental test would be in ultracold atoms in optical lattices: momentum-resolved radio-frequency spectroscopy could look for a vanishing spectral weight at momenta away from the expected Fermi momentum while the system still conducts, which would directly probe the predicted smooth zeros of ReG(k,0).
  • The diagnostic proposed here, smooth zero crossings in ReG(k,0) accompanied by a divergent self-energy, can be applied to other sign-problem-free or tensor-network-accessible models, such as the one-dimensional Hubbard model or the t-J model, to search for analogous non-Luttinger metallic phases.
  • The observation that n(k) always intersects the line n(k) = n at k_F, even in the non-Luttinger liquid, suggests that a sum-rule constraint from particle-number conservation may survive the failure of the Luttinger theorem; if confirmed, this invariant could serve as a separate, more robust characterization of the generalized Fermi surface.
  • If the smooth zeros are real, then the Luttinger-Ward functional, which generates the free energy from the self-energy, becomes ill-defined in the non-Luttinger liquid, implying that a fully non-perturbative description of this phase cannot be built from the usual skeleton-diagram expansion.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the one-dimensional generalized t-t'-V model (spinless fermions with nearest-neighbor and next-nearest-neighbor hopping plus nearest-neighbor repulsion) using DMRG on 102-site periodic chains. It computes the zero-frequency single-particle Green's function G(k,0) and extracts the Luttinger integral I_L from the sign of ReG(k,0). The central claim is that in the weak-coupling regime I_L equals the particle density n (Luttinger theorem holds), but near half-filling at strong coupling the singularity at k_F is progressively destroyed, zero crossings of ReG(k,0) appear away from k_F, and I_L deviates from n, defining a metallic 'non-Luttinger liquid' (NLL) phase. At exact half-filling a charge-density-wave insulator forms. The paper attributes the breakdown to the interplay of interaction-driven spectral reconstruction and particle-hole asymmetry.

Significance. If the claimed violation is correct, the result would be significant: it would challenge the generalized Luttinger theorem for one-dimensional systems established in Ref. [7] and would identify a metallic state beyond the Luttinger-liquid paradigm. The numerical methodology is a genuine step forward: DMRG is benchmarked against exact diagonalization in the Appendix (Fig. 8), and the 102-site periodic-boundary simulations provide high momentum resolution that improves on earlier ED studies. However, the quantitative evidence for the central claim is currently incomplete: no eta-to-zero extrapolation of the sign structure is shown, the reported I_L values are not directly presented, the metallic (gapless) nature of the NLL phase is asserted without a gap analysis, and the apparent tension with Ref. [7] is not addressed. The paper is therefore a promising but not yet fully established contribution.

major comments (5)
  1. [Sec. III, Fig. 4 caption] All ReG(k,0) data are computed with a fixed damping eta=0.05t, but the Luttinger integral in Eq. (1) is defined at omega=0 in the exact eta->0 limit. The paper does not demonstrate that the sign structure of ReG(k,0), the zero-crossing positions k_L, or the resulting I_L are stable as eta approaches zero. In the NLL regime ReG(k,0) is smooth and small over wide momentum intervals, so finite-eta broadening can shift existing zero crossings or create new ones. A systematic eta-dependence study (e.g., eta=0.005, 0.01, 0.02, 0.05) with an extrapolation to eta=0 is required before the central violation claim is established.
  2. [Sec. III and Fig. 2] The paper's title and abstract claim a violation of Luttinger's theorem, but the value of I_L (or the deviation Delta I_L = I_L - n) is never reported for any parameter set. Fig. 2 shows only the Luttinger momentum k_L at half-filling, and the statement that k_L was extrapolated to the thermodynamic limit is not supported by any visible finite-size data or by a description of the extrapolation procedure. For the off-half-filling NLL cases (N_f=47,49) that are central to the claim, no I_L values are given. The quantitative difference between I_L and n and its finite-size scaling should be displayed explicitly.
  3. [Sec. III] The identification of the NLL phase as metallic rests on the assertion that the system remains gapless at n~0.48 even at V/t=10, but no charge-gap data or extrapolation are shown. Without evidence that the single-particle gap vanishes in the thermodynamic limit, the distinction between the proposed NLL metal and the CDW insulator is not established. A gap calculation (for example, from ground-state energies for N_f±1 or from the density correlation function) should be presented for the parameters claimed to be in the NLL phase.
  4. [Sec. I and Sec. V] The paper cites Ref. [7] (Yamanaka, Oshikawa, Affleck) as the generalized Luttinger theorem for one-dimensional systems but never explains why the claimed NLL violation does not contradict that nonperturbative result. The conditions under which Ref. [7] applies (gapless phases, spinless versus spinful fermions, presence of umklapp scattering) and the reason the NLL phase lies outside those conditions need to be stated explicitly. As written, the central claim appears to be in tension with a well-known theorem in the same field, and that tension must be resolved for the claim to be credible.
  5. [Sec. IV and Fig. 5] The self-energy Sigma(k,0) is introduced without a definition. If it is defined through Dyson's equation, a zero of ReG(k,0) does not by itself imply a divergent self-energy; the behavior of ImG(k,0) also matters. The text's assertion that 'divergence points of the self-energy align with zero-crossings of ReG(k,0)' needs a derivation or a plot showing the components of Sigma and ImG. As presented, the inference from Fig. 5 is not justified and may be an artifact of the chosen representation.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. IV heading] The section heading 'DEVIA TION ANALYSIS' contains a typographical error; it should read 'DEVIATION ANALYSIS'.
  2. [Fig. 2] The y-axis label 'k_L / (k_F/pi) = 1/2' is confusing. State the normalization explicitly (for example, k_L/k_F with k_F=pi/2) in the axis label or the caption.
  3. [Eq. (1)] Equation (1) is written for general dimension d, but the paper applies it in one dimension. The integration range over the Brillouin zone should be defined explicitly to avoid ambiguity about the factor 1/(2pi).
  4. [Appendix, Fig. 8] The benchmark comparison between DMRG and ED in Fig. 8 does not state the damping eta used for the Green's function calculation. For consistency with Fig. 4, specify whether the same eta=0.05t was used in both methods.
  5. [Sec. III, Fig. 3] The observation that n(k) always intersects the line n(k)=n at k_F is interesting and potentially important, but no derivation or numerical error estimate is provided. A brief explanation or a test against exact sum rules would strengthen the statement.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

Central claim is a direct DMRG measurement of ReG(k,0); no parameter is fitted to the target and no self-citation carries the derivation, so no circularity is present.

full rationale

The paper's central result is that the Luttinger integral I_L, defined as the momentum integral of θ(ReG(k,ω=0)) (Eq. 1), deviates from the particle density n in the strongly coupled near-half-filled regime of the 1D t-t'-V model. This is obtained by a direct numerical computation: DMRG solves the Hamiltonian (2) for the ground state and uses the correction-vector method (Eqs. 5-7) to obtain G(k,0), whose sign structure then determines I_L. The comparison quantity n = N_f/N is an independent input (the fixed particle number), not a fit parameter. No equation in the paper defines ReG(k,0) in terms of I_L, nor is I_L fitted to n; the deviation is read off from independently computed Green's functions. The same-group reference [30] (Hatsugai-Kohmoto review) is used only for a qualitative comparison of self-energy features and is not load-bearing for the derivation. External validation is provided by the ED benchmarks in the Appendix (Fig. 8) and by consistency with the independent ED extrapolations of Ref. [9]. The fixed damping η=0.05t used in Fig. 4 is a numerical regularization that could affect the sign pattern, but that is a robustness/correctness concern about the numerical treatment of ReG(k,0), not a circularity: the sign structure is measured from the model, not assumed from the conclusion. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem from the authors' prior work is invoked, and no known result is merely relabeled. The phase classification (LL, NLL, CDW) is tied to distinctive features of the computed Green's function and correlation functions rather than being imposed by the definition of I_L. Therefore there is no specific step in the derivation chain that reduces to its own inputs, and the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on one numerical regularization parameter (eta), and on the assumption that the sign structure of the broadened Green's function matches the exact limit. The model parameters (t', V, filling) are inputs, not fitted. No new physical entities are introduced; the NLL label is a phase name, not a new force or particle.

free parameters (1)
  • damping factor eta = 0.05t
    Used in the correction-vector evaluation of G(k,omega=0); all curves use eta=0.05t. The sign structure of ReG and zero-crossing positions k_L are extracted from broadened spectra, and the paper does not demonstrate extrapolation to eta=0.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The generalized Luttinger theorem, I_L = integral theta(ReG(k,0)) dk/(2pi) = n, is the relevant statement of Luttinger's theorem for 1D systems.
    Taken from Ref [7] (Yamanaka, Oshikawa, Affleck). The paper uses this definition to compute I_L numerically; if a different regularization were used, the deviation might differ.
  • domain assumption The sign structure of ReG(k,0) computed with a finite broadening eta=0.05t correctly captures the eta=0 limit.
    All G(k,omega=0) curves are evaluated with eta=0.05t; zero crossings are identified from these broadened spectra, and no eta-dependence study is presented. The Luttinger integral depends on these sign changes.
  • domain assumption Finite-size results for N=82-102 represent the thermodynamic limit for the phases and deviations reported.
    The authors provide finite-size scaling for k_L (Fig 2) and ED benchmarks, but not a controlled extrapolation of I_L itself. The qualitative phase evolution is assumed to persist.
  • standard math The Dyson equation, G^{-1}(k,0) = omega + mu - epsilon_k - Sigma(k,0), remains valid and implies that zeros of ReG correspond to divergences of ReSigma.
    Used in Sec IV to connect zero crossings to divergent self-energy. Standard relationship but relies on the analytic structure of G.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Violation of Luttinger's theorem in one-dimensional interacting fermions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UKLAMKQY

@misc{pith2026250604064,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Violation of Luttinger's theorem in one-dimensional interacting fermions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UKLAMKQY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.04064}
}
abstract

Using the density matrix renormalization group method, we systematically investigate the evolution of the Luttinger integral in the one-dimensional generalized $t$-$V$ model as a function of filling and interaction strength, and identify three representative phases. In the weak-coupling regime, the zero-frequency Green's function exhibits a branch-cut structure at the Fermi momentum, and the Luttinger integral accurately reflects the particle density, indicating that the Luttinger theorem holds. As the interaction increases, the spectral weight near the Fermi momentum is gradually suppressed. Interestingly, in the strong coupling regime near half-filling, this singularity is progressively destroyed, accompanied by the emergence of momentum-space zeros in the real part of the Green's function, leading to a novel non-Fermi liquid metallic phase beyond the classic Luttinger liquid paradigm, where the Luttinger surface is no longer defined by a single singularity. While finite spectral weight remains at the original Fermi momentum, the singularity gradually diminishes. Meanwhile, zeros with negligible spectral weight appear away from this momentum, significantly affecting the integral. At exact half-filling, a single-particle gap opens, and the Green's function becomes nearly vanishing across the entire momentum space, indicating the complete suppression of low-energy electronic states consistent with the nature of an insulating charge-density-wave phase. These results suggest that the breakdown of the Luttinger theorem is not triggered by a single mechanism, but rather results from the interplay between interaction-driven evolution of excitation modes and the breaking of particle-hole symmetry, ultimately leading to a continuous reconstruction of the generalized Fermi surface from topologically protected to correlation-driven.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.04064 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Schematic illustration of the Hamiltonian for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Evolution of the Luttinger momentum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Evolution of the momentum distribution function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Green’s function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Self-energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Momentum-space distribution of the density-density correlation function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. (Color online) Normalized [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

  1. [9]

    Kokalj and P

    J. Kokalj and P. Prelov ˇsek, Breakdown of the Luttinger Sum Rule within the Mott-Hubbard Insulator, Phys. Rev. B78, 153103 (2008)

    work page 2008

  2. [10]

    B ¨ohler, H

    A. B ¨ohler, H. Schl ¨omer, U. Schollw ¨ock, A. Bohrdt, and F. Grusdt, Probing a Modified Luttinger Sum Rule in the Strongly Interacting One-Dimensional Fermi-Hubbard Model, Phys. Rev. B111, 045107 (2025)

    work page 2025

  3. [7]

    Yamanaka, M

    M. Yamanaka, M. Oshikawa, and I. Affleck, Nonperturbative Approach to Luttinger’s Theorem in One Dimension, Phys. Rev. Lett.79, 1110 (1997)

    work page 1997

  4. [1]

    J. M. Luttinger and J. C. Ward, Ground-State Energy of a Many- Fermion System. II, Phys. Rev.118, 1417 (1960)

    work page 1960

  5. [2]

    Landau, edited by D

    90 - The Theory of a Fermi Liquid, inCollected Papers of L.D. Landau, edited by D. TER HAAR (Pergamon, 1965) pp. 723– 730

    work page 1965

  6. [3]

    J. M. Luttinger, Fermi Surface and Some Simple Equilibrium Properties of a System of Interacting Fermions, Phys. Rev.119, 1153 (1960)

    work page 1960

  7. [4]

    V oit, One-Dimensional Fermi Liquids, Reports on Progress in Physics58, 977 (1995)

    J. V oit, One-Dimensional Fermi Liquids, Reports on Progress in Physics58, 977 (1995)

    work page 1995

  8. [5]

    Giamarchi,Quantum Physics in One Dimension(Oxford University Press, 2003)

    T. Giamarchi,Quantum Physics in One Dimension(Oxford University Press, 2003)

    2003

Show all 35 references
  1. [6]

    Sch ¨onhammer, The Luttinger Liquid Concept for Interacting Electrons in One Dimension, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter14, 12783 (2002)

    K. Sch ¨onhammer, The Luttinger Liquid Concept for Interacting Electrons in One Dimension, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter14, 12783 (2002)

    2002

  2. [8]

    W.-W. Yang, Q. Chen, H.-G. Luo, and Y . Zhong, Violation of Luttinger’s Theorem in the Simplest Doped Mott Insulator: Falicov-Kimball Model in the Strong-Correlation Limit, Phys. Rev. B106, 195117 (2022)

    2022

  3. [11]

    Osborne, T

    I. Osborne, T. Paiva, and N. Trivedi, Broken Luttinger Theorem in the Two-Dimensional Fermi-Hubbard Model, Phys. Rev. B 104, 235122 (2021)

    2021

  4. [12]

    Ortloff, M

    J. Ortloff, M. Balzer, and M. Potthoff, Non-Perturbative Con- serving Approximations and Luttinger’s Sum Rule, Eur. Phys. J. B58, 37 (2007)

    2007

  5. [13]

    Pan and Z

    G. Pan and Z. Y . Meng, The sign problem in quantum monte carlo simulations, inEncyclopedia of Condensed Matter Physics (Second Edition), edited by T. Chakraborty (Academic Press, Oxford, 2024) second edition ed., pp. 879–893

    2024

  6. [14]

    Bloch, J

    I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and W. Zwerger, Many-Body Physics with Ultracold Gases, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 885 (2008)

    2008

  7. [15]

    Osborn, D

    R. Osborn, D. Pelc, M. J. Krogstad, S. Rosenkranz, and M. Greven, Diffuse Scattering from Correlated Elec- tron Systems, Science Advances11, eadt7770 (2025), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/sciadv.adt7770

    2025 doi

  8. [16]

    Damascelli, Z

    A. Damascelli, Z. Hussain, and Z.-X. Shen, Angle-Resolved Photoemission Studies of the Cuprate Superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys.75, 473 (2003)

    2003

  9. [17]

    P. A. Lee, N. Nagaosa, and X.-G. Wen, Doping a Mott In- sulator: Physics of High-Temperature Superconductivity, Rev. Mod. Phys.78, 17 (2006)

    2006

  10. [18]

    G. A. Fiete, K. Le Hur, and L. Balents, Coulomb Drag be- tween Two Spin-Incoherent Luttinger Liquids, Phys. Rev. B73, 165104 (2006)

    2006

  11. [19]

    Karrasch and J

    C. Karrasch and J. E. Moore, Luttinger Liquid Physics from the Infinite-System Density Matrix Renormalization Group, Phys. Rev. B86, 155156 (2012)

    2012

  12. [20]

    Schollw ¨ock, The Density-Matrix Renormalization Group in the Age of Matrix Product States, Annals of Physics326, 96 (2011), january 2011 Special Issue

    U. Schollw ¨ock, The Density-Matrix Renormalization Group in the Age of Matrix Product States, Annals of Physics326, 96 (2011), january 2011 Special Issue

    2011

  13. [21]

    Schollw ¨ock, The Density-Matrix Renormalization Group, Rev

    U. Schollw ¨ock, The Density-Matrix Renormalization Group, Rev. Mod. Phys.77, 259 (2005)

    2005

  14. [22]

    Verstraete, D

    F. Verstraete, D. Porras, and J. I. Cirac, Density Matrix Renor- malization Group and Periodic Boundary Conditions: A Quan- 11 tum Information Perspective, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 227205 (2004)

    2004

  15. [23]

    Nocera and G

    A. Nocera and G. Alvarez, Spectral Functions with the Den- sity Matrix Renormalization Group: Krylov-Space Approach for Correction Vectors, Phys. Rev. E94, 053308 (2016)

    2016

  16. [24]

    Dzyaloshinskii, Some Consequences of the Luttinger Theo- rem: The Luttinger Surfaces in Non-Fermi Liquids and Mott Insulators, Phys

    I. Dzyaloshinskii, Some Consequences of the Luttinger Theo- rem: The Luttinger Surfaces in Non-Fermi Liquids and Mott Insulators, Phys. Rev. B68, 085113 (2003)

    2003

  17. [25]

    Seki and S

    K. Seki and S. Yunoki, Topological Interpretation of the Lut- tinger Theorem, Phys. Rev. B96, 085124 (2017)

    2017

  18. [26]

    F. D. M. Haldane, ’Luttinger Liquid Theory’ of One- Dimensional Quantum Fluids. I. Properties of the Luttinger Model and Their Extension to the General 1D Interacting Spin- less Fermi Gas, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics14, 2585 (1981)

    1981

  19. [27]

    K. B. Dave, P. W. Phillips, and C. L. Kane, Absence of Lut- tinger’s Theorem Due to Zeros in the Single-Particle Green Function, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 090403 (2013)

    2013

  20. [28]

    Wagner, D

    N. Wagner, D. Guerci, A. J. Millis, and G. Sangiovanni, Edge Zeros and Boundary Spinons in Topological Mott Insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 126504 (2024)

    2024

  21. [29]

    Wagner, L

    N. Wagner, L. Crippa, A. Amaricci, P. Hansmann, M. Klett, E. J. K ¨onig, T. Sch ¨afer, D. Di Sante, J. Cano, A. J. Millis, A. Georges, and G. Sangiovanni, Mott Insulators with Bound- ary Zeros, Nature Communications14, 7531 (2023)

    2023

  22. [30]

    Zhao, W.-W

    M. Zhao, W.-W. Yang, and Y . Zhong, Hatsugai–Kohmoto Models: Exactly Solvable Playground for Mottness and Non- Fermi Liquid, J. Phys. Condens. Matter37, 183005 (2025), arXiv:2501.00388 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2025 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Coleman, Heavy Fermions: Electrons at the Edge of Mag- netism, inHandbook of Magnetism and Advanced Magnetic Materials(John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2007)

    P. Coleman, Heavy Fermions: Electrons at the Edge of Mag- netism, inHandbook of Magnetism and Advanced Magnetic Materials(John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2007)

    2007

  24. [32]

    G. R. Stewart, Non-Fermi-Liquid Behavior ind- andf-Electron Metals, Rev. Mod. Phys.73, 797 (2001)

    2001

  25. [33]

    S. A. Hartnoll and A. P. Mackenzie, Colloquium: Planckian Dissipation in Metals, Rev. Mod. Phys.94, 041002 (2022)

    2022

  26. [34]

    Yoshida, M

    T. Yoshida, M. Hashimoto, I. M. Vishik, Z.-X. Shen, and A. Fu- jimori, Pseudogap, Superconducting Gap, and Fermi Arc in High-Tc Cuprates Revealed by Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan81, 011006 (2012)

    2012

  27. [35]

    Oshikawa, Topological Approach to Luttinger’s Theorem and the Fermi Surface of a Kondo Lattice, Phys

    M. Oshikawa, Topological Approach to Luttinger’s Theorem and the Fermi Surface of a Kondo Lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 3370 (2000)

    2000

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.