pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.27150 · v1 · pith:ULQQWNFBnew · submitted 2026-05-26 · 🧮 math.SP · math.DS

The butterflies' effects

Siegfried Beckus This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 14:13 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.SP math.DS
keywords spectral butterfliesSchrödinger operatorsweighted Delone setsaperiodic orderfractal spectraself-similar structuresspectral theoryparameter-dependent families
0
0 comments X

The pith

Spectra of Schrödinger operators on weighted Delone sets form spectral butterflies with fractal and self-similar structures.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews spectral properties of Schrödinger operators defined using weighted Delone sets in aperiodic order. It explores parameter-dependent families that interpolate between periodic and aperiodic regimes. These families produce spectra called spectral butterflies that display fractal and self-similar structures. The framework applies across dimensions and to non-Abelian groups, allowing new connections in the literature.

Core claim

Using weighted Delone sets to model aperiodic order, parameter-dependent families of Schrödinger operators interpolate between periodic and aperiodic regimes. Their spectra form spectral butterflies that reflect fractal and self-similar structures. This approach is largely dimension-independent and extends to non-Abelian groups and more general settings, with new examples and connections established.

What carries the argument

Spectral butterflies arising from parameter-dependent families of Schrödinger operators on weighted Delone sets, which reveal the fractal nature of the spectra through the interplay of dynamics and spectral properties.

If this is right

  • The spectra exhibit self-similarity and fractal structures in both periodic and aperiodic limits.
  • New connections are made between existing works on aperiodic spectral theory.
  • The results hold in higher dimensions and for non-Abelian groups.
  • Additional examples can be constructed to illustrate the butterfly effect in spectra.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Such butterflies might appear in physical systems like quasicrystals, suggesting observable fractal energy bands.
  • Computational models could use these families to simulate spectral transitions.
  • Links to ergodic theory and dynamical systems could be strengthened through this spectral view.

Load-bearing premise

Weighted Delone sets are sufficient to capture the essential interplay between the underlying dynamics and the spectral properties of the associated Schrödinger operators.

What would settle it

A counterexample where a parameter-dependent family on a weighted Delone set produces a spectrum without fractal or self-similar butterfly structure would disprove the main claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.27150 by Siegfried Beckus.

Figure 1.1
Figure 1.1. Figure 1.1: The Hofstadter butterfly taken from [125]. Many of the models under consideration depend on parameters that interpolate between periodic and non-periodic dynamical systems. For periodic configurations, the spectrum of the corresponding operator can be computed numerically. Plotting the spectrum across a range of parameters reveals striking internal structures that suggest fractal or self￾similar properti… view at source ↗
Figure 1.2
Figure 1.2. Figure 1.2: The Kohmoto butterfly taken from [55]. Several contributions addressing these questions are discussed here. We introduce the relevant concepts, establish connections to other results in the literature, and explain how the dynamical structure governs particular spectral behavior. While many of the examples considered are one-dimensional, the results themselves are often dimension-independent and extend to… view at source ↗
Figure 1.3
Figure 1.3. Figure 1.3: This figure was created in collaboration with Ram Band as part of the joint [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_1_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.1
Figure 3.1. Figure 3.1: A sketch of the local discrepancy for two uniformly discrete weighted Π (blue [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_3_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.2
Figure 3.2. Figure 3.2: Substitution rule for the table tiling. For the sake of presentation, we identify [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_3_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.3
Figure 3.3. Figure 3.3: Iteration of the table tiling substitution on a single letter. Figure taken from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_3_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.4
Figure 3.4. Figure 3.4: A larger patch is illustrated and several supatches are marked by coloring the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p044_3_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.5
Figure 3.5. Figure 3.5: The second iterate S 2 (a) for each a ∈ A of the table tiling contains all letters of the alphabet. Theorem 3.43 ([34]). Let S be a substitution map associated with D and S = (A, λ0, S0). If S is primitive, then the associated substitution subshift Ω(S) is strictly ergodic, i.e., minimal and uniquely ergodic. Moreover, every element in Ω(S) is linearly repetitive. Proof. The result is proven in [34, Thm.… view at source ↗
Figure 3.6
Figure 3.6. Figure 3.6: The gray shaded area represent first the fundamental domain [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p047_3_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.7
Figure 3.7. Figure 3.7: The gray shaded region indicates the set [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p048_3_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.8
Figure 3.8. Figure 3.8: The gray shaded region illustrates the fundamental domain [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p048_3_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.9
Figure 3.9. Figure 3.9: The second iteration S 2 (•) = S 2 (a), supported on V (2) ∩ Z 2 , is shown. The gray shaded region represents V (2). Elements of Dλ0 (V (1) ∩ Z 2 ) are indicated by black circles. The orange square represents the ball B [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p049_3_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.10
Figure 3.10. Figure 3.10: Substitution rule S0 for the Heisenberg example. Figure taken from [34]. As shown in [34, Thm. 1.4, Exam. 6.7, Prop. 6.6], the associated substitution map S is primitive and non-periodic. Hence, the resulting subshift Ω(S) is strictly ergodic, strongly aperiodic, and every configuration in Ω(S) is linearly repetitive [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p050_3_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.11
Figure 3.11. Figure 3.11: Support V (4) for DH (left) and DR (right) with λ0 = 3. The maximal and minimal values of the third coordinate are plotted as functions of the (x, y)-position. Figure taken from [34]. The key difference between DH and DR lies in the underlying group structure. Since SH also defines a substitution rule over DR, we may consider the associated data SR := SH over DR [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p051_3… view at source ↗
Figure 3.12
Figure 3.12. Figure 3.12: The substitution graph GS(T; NT ) with T = {0, 1} and NT = 1 discussed in Example 3.50, see [236]. the general setting of substitution systems defined in [34] (discussed in the previous Sec￾tion 3.4). Moreover, we were able to estimate the rate of convergence of these subshifts (Theorem 3.55) in the metric dA. In combination [28, 41], these estimates lead to expo￾nential convergence rates of the spectra… view at source ↗
Figure 3.13
Figure 3.13. Figure 3.13: The legal patches of the table tiling substitution of support [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p054_3_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.14
Figure 3.14. Figure 3.14: The non-legal patches P and Q for the table tiling substitution and there iterative S(P) and S(Q) satisfying P ≺ S(Q) and Q ≺ S(P). In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p054_3_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.15
Figure 3.15. Figure 3.15: In panel (a), the configuration ωrb and its image under S. The subpatches W(ωrb) ∩ AT are provided in panel (b). We emphasize that ωrb is periodic, and thus the above result shows that the table tiling subshift Ωtable is periodically approximable. In a forthcoming preprint we analyze the structure of substitution graphs for block substi￾tutions and their spectral consequences in more detail; see [20]. W… view at source ↗
Figure 3.16
Figure 3.16. Figure 3.16: A sketch of a periodic tiling T0 defined in [104]. For convenience, some of the fundamental cells are shaded in gray to distinguish them. In [104], the authors constructed a periodic tiling T0 using the aforementioned two tiles, as sketched in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p057_3_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.1
Figure 4.1. Figure 4.1: The Hofstadter butterfly taken from [125]. These numerical computations already reveal self-similar and fractal structures1 in the spectrum, as observed earlier by Azbel [9]. The reader is also referred to recent elabora￾tions [216, 215]. Since then, the Hofstadter butterfly has attracted considerable attention (see a more detailed discussion in Section 4.3 and Chapter 5). Similar spectral fea￾tures and … view at source ↗
Figure 4.2
Figure 4.2. Figure 4.2: The Kohmoto butterfly taken from [55]. In both models – the almost Mathieu operator and the Kohmoto model – the spectral properties of the operators with irrational α are of central interest. Since these operators are no longer periodic, rational approximations of α are employed to study their spectral nature; see the detailed discussion in [90] and in Chapter 5. For these models, the conver￾gence (and i… view at source ↗
Figure 4.3
Figure 4.3. Figure 4.3: The Kohmoto butterfly: For rational α ∈ [0, 1], the spectrum σ(Hα,V ) is shown for coupling V = 4. At selected rational values r, s ∈ [0, 1], spectral defects (marked as red points) arising from the left-sided limits (r− and s−) and right-sided limits (r+ and s+) are highlighted. The number of such defects depends on the denominators of r and s. For details, see [31] and the discussion below [PITH_FULL_… view at source ↗
Figure 5.1
Figure 5.1. Figure 5.1: An illustration of the plateaus of an integrated density of states and a gap [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p082_5_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5.2
Figure 5.2. Figure 5.2: (a) Illustration of the classification of spectral bands into types [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p088_5_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5.3
Figure 5.3. Figure 5.3: Panel (a) illustrates the local structure of the first spectral bands for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p090_5_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5.4
Figure 5.4. Figure 5.4: Initial part of the spectral α-tree for a continued fraction expansion beginning with [0, 0, 2, 3, 1]. Let α ∈ [0, 1] \ Q have continued fraction expansion [0, 0, c1, c2, . . .]. Recall that we define the kth convergent ck := [0, 0, c1, . . . , ck] and denote by αk := φ(ck) ∈ [0, 1] ∩ Q its evaluation. In order to consistently identify vertices of the spectral α-tree with spectral bands, we extend the in… view at source ↗
Figure 5.5
Figure 5.5. Figure 5.5: A sketch of a spectral α-tree. The two infinite paths γ ∈ ∂Tα (blue) and η ∈ ∂Tα (red) satisfy γ ≺ η and Nα(γ) = Nα(η) = {nα} [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p093_5_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5.6
Figure 5.6. Figure 5.6: This figure was created in collaboration with Ram Band as part of the joint [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p098_5_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6.1
Figure 6.1. Figure 6.1: Sketch of the Delone graph. Black points represent elements of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p104_6_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8.1
Figure 8.1. Figure 8.1: The weighted Delone set Π is shown in blue, Ξ in black, and the shifted set [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p136_8_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8.2
Figure 8.2. Figure 8.2: The set F ⊆ R 2 (gray), its inner approximation F−r+ (blue), and outer approx￾imation F+r+ (green) are shown. Lattice points in Γ = Z 2 that lie in F are marked in red. The dashed red line marks the boundary of the set FΓ, where V = [− 1 2 , 1 2 ) 2 . Here V (k) = Vλ0 (k) are recursively defined in eq. (3.7) (for M = {e}) via V (0) := V and V (n) := Dλ0 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p138_8_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8.3
Figure 8.3. Figure 8.3: Different choices for the cut-off function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p152_8_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This work studies spectral properties of Schr\"odinger operators in the context of aperiodic order, using weighted Delone sets to explore the interplay between the underlying dynamics and spectral properties. We study parameter-dependent families interpolating between periodic and aperiodic regimes, whose spectra form so-called spectral butterflies. These reflect fractal and self-similar structures of the spectra. We review existing results, introduce additional examples, and establish new connections between works in the literature. The framework is largely dimension-independent and extends to non-Abelian groups and more general settings.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies spectral properties of Schrödinger operators in the context of aperiodic order, employing weighted Delone sets to examine the interplay between dynamics and spectra. It focuses on parameter-dependent families interpolating between periodic and aperiodic regimes, whose spectra form fractal and self-similar structures termed spectral butterflies. The work reviews existing results, introduces additional examples, and draws new connections across the literature. The framework is presented as largely dimension-independent and extendable to non-Abelian groups and more general settings.

Significance. If the claims hold, the paper offers a useful synthesis of results on spectral butterflies arising from parameter-dependent Schrödinger operators on aperiodic structures. By connecting disparate works and providing examples in a dimension-independent setting, it could serve as a reference point for researchers studying fractal spectra and the dynamics-spectra interplay. The standard use of weighted Delone sets to encode the relevant dynamics supports the review-plus-examples approach.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the term 'spectral butterflies' is introduced without a brief parenthetical definition or citation to the originating reference, which may hinder readers new to the subfield.
  2. [Introduction] The manuscript would benefit from an explicit statement in the introduction of which new connections between existing works are being established, to distinguish the review component from the novel contributions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive summary, significance assessment, and recommendation of minor revision. No specific major comments were provided in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; review paper with no load-bearing derivations or self-referential fits

full rationale

The provided text consists of an abstract and a high-level description of a review-plus-examples manuscript on spectral butterflies for Schrödinger operators on weighted Delone sets. No equations, parameter fits, uniqueness theorems, or derivation chains appear in the visible content. The central claims are framed as connections to existing literature rather than new derivations that could reduce to inputs by construction. As a dimension-independent review extending prior work without visible self-citation load-bearing steps or fitted predictions, the argument is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption that weighted Delone sets adequately model the dynamics relevant to spectral properties; no free parameters, invented entities, or additional axioms are visible in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Weighted Delone sets capture the essential interplay between dynamics and spectral properties in aperiodic order.
    Invoked throughout the abstract as the modeling framework.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5597 in / 1267 out tokens · 38905 ms · 2026-06-29T14:13:04.514197+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

253 extracted references · 136 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    J. E. Anderson and I. F. Putnam. Topological invariants for substitution tilings and their associatedC ∗-algebras.Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems, 18(3):509–537,

  2. [2]

    doi:10.1017/S0143385798100457

    work page doi:10.1017/s0143385798100457

  3. [3]

    Argabright and J

    L. Argabright and J. Gil de Lamadrid.Fourier analysis of unbounded measures on locally compact abelian groups, volume No. 145 ofMemoirs of the American Mathematical Society. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1974

    1974

  4. [4]

    Avila and S

    A. Avila and S. Jitomirskaya. The Ten Martini Problem.Ann. of Math. (2), 170(1):303–342, 2009

    2009

  5. [5]

    Avila and S

    A. Avila and S. Jitomirskaya. Almost localization and almost reducibility.J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS), 12(1):93–131, 2010. doi:10.4171/JEMS/191

    work page doi:10.4171/jems/191 2010

  6. [6]

    Avila and R

    A. Avila and R. Krikorian. Reducibility or nonuniform hyperbolicity for quasiperiodic Schr¨ odinger cocycles.Ann. of Math. (2), 164(3):911–940, 2006. doi:10.4007/annals.2006.164.911

    work page doi:10.4007/annals.2006.164.911 2006

  7. [7]

    Avila, J

    A. Avila, J. You, and Q. Zhou. Dry Ten Martini Problem in the non-critical case,

  8. [8]

    Avron and B

    J. Avron and B. Simon. Almost periodic Schr¨ odinger operators. II. The integrated density of states.Duke Math. J., 50(1):369–391, 1983. doi:10.1215/S0012-7094-83- 05016-0

    work page doi:10.1215/s0012-7094-83- 1983

  9. [9]

    Avron, P

    J. Avron, P. H. M. van Mouche, and B. Simon. On the measure of the spectrum for the almost Mathieu operator.Comm. Math. Phys., 132(1):103–118, 1990

    1990

  10. [10]

    M. Ya. Azbel. Energy spectrum of a conduction electron in a magnetic field.Soviet Physics JETP, 19(3), 1964

    1964

  11. [11]

    M. Baake. Diffraction of weighted lattice subsets.Canad. Math. Bull., 45(4):483– 498, 2002. Dedicated to Robert V. Moody

    2002

  12. [12]

    Baake and U

    M. Baake and U. Grimm.Aperiodic order. Vol. 1, volume 149 ofEncyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013. A mathematical invitation, With a foreword by Roger Penrose

    2013

  13. [13]

    Indagationes Mathematicae , FJOURNAL =

    M. Baake, C. Huck, and N. Strungaru. On weak model sets of extremal density. Indag. Math. (N.S.), 28(1):3–31, 2017. doi:10.1016/j.indag.2016.11.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.indag.2016.11.002 2017

  14. [14]

    Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , VOLUME =

    M. Baake and D. Lenz. Dynamical systems on translation bounded measures: pure point dynamical and diffraction spectra.Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems, 24(6):1867–1893, 2004. doi:10.1017/S0143385704000318. 107 108BIBLIOGRAPHY

    work page doi:10.1017/s0143385704000318 2004

  15. [15]

    , TITLE =

    M. Baake and R. V. Moody. Weighted Dirac combs with pure point diffraction.J. Reine Angew. Math., 573:61–94, 2004. doi:10.1515/crll.2004.064

    work page doi:10.1515/crll.2004.064 2004

  16. [16]

    Random Networks of Automata: A Simple Annealed Ap- proximation

    R. Band and S. Beckus. From quasiperiodicity to a complete coloring of the Kohmoto butterfly.Europhysics Letters, 2026. in press, Doi: 10.1209/0295- 5075/ae59af

    work page doi:10.1209/0295- 2026

  17. [17]

    R. Band, S. Beckus, B. Biber, L. Raymond, and Y. Thomas. A review of a work by L. Raymond: Sturmian Hamiltonians with a large coupling constant—periodic approximations and gap labels. InMathematical models for interacting dynamics on networks, Trends Math., pages 1–83. Birkh¨ auser/Springer, Cham, [2026]©2026

    2026

  18. [18]

    R. Band, S. Beckus, and R. Loewy. Workshop: Aspects of Aperiodic Order.Ober- wolfach Rep., 2023. extended version in arXiv:2309.04351

    work page arXiv 2023

  19. [19]

    R. Band, S. Beckus, and R. Loewy. The Dry Ten Martini Problem for Sturmian Hamiltonians, 2024. arXiv:2402.16703

    work page arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    R. Band, S. Beckus, F. Pogorzelski, and L. Tenenbaum. Spectral approximation for substitution systems.Journal d’Analyse Math´ ematique, 2026. doi: 10.1007/s11854- 026-0445-0

    work page doi:10.1007/s11854- 2026

  21. [21]

    R. Band, S. Beckus, F. Pogorzelski, and L. Tenenbaum. Spectral pollution in sub- stitution systems.ArXiv:2604.12637, 2026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  22. [22]

    Baradaran, P

    M. Baradaran, P. Exner, and J. Lipovsk´ y. Magnetic square lattice with vertex coupling of a preferred orientation.Ann. Physics, 454:Paper No. 169339, 12, 2023. doi:10.1016/j.aop.2023.169339

    work page doi:10.1016/j.aop.2023.169339 2023

  23. [23]

    Baraviera and R

    A. Baraviera and R. Leplaideur. Substreetutions and more on trees.Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems, 44(9):2399–2453, 2024. doi:10.1017/etds.2023.108

    work page doi:10.1017/etds.2023.108 2024

  24. [24]

    Barge and C

    M. Barge and C. Olimb. Asymptotic structure in substitution tiling spaces.Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems, 34(1):55–94, 2014. doi:10.1017/etds.2012.118

    work page doi:10.1017/etds.2012.118 2014

  25. [25]

    Becker, R

    S. Becker, R. Han, and S. Jitomirskaya. Cantor spectrum of graphene in magnetic fields.Invent. Math., 218(3):979–1041, 2019. doi:10.1007/s00222-019-00916-y

    work page doi:10.1007/s00222-019-00916-y 2019

  26. [27]

    Beckus.Spectral approximation of aperiodic Schr¨ odinger operators

    S. Beckus.Spectral approximation of aperiodic Schr¨ odinger operators. PhD thesis, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Germany, 2016

    2016

  27. [28]

    Beckus and J

    S. Beckus and J. Bellissard. Continuity of the spectrum of a field of self-adjoint operators.Ann. Henri Poincar´ e, 17(12):3425–3442, 2016. doi:10.1007/s00023-016- 0496-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s00023-016- 2016

  28. [29]

    Beckus, J

    S. Beckus, J. Bellissard, and H. Cornean. H¨ older continuity of the spec- tra for aperiodic Hamiltonians.Ann. Henri Poincar´ e, 20(11):3603–3631, 2019. doi:10.1007/s00023-019-00848-6

    work page doi:10.1007/s00023-019-00848-6 2019

  29. [30]

    Beckus, J

    S. Beckus, J. Bellissard, and G. De Nittis. Spectral continuity for aperiodic quantum systems I. General theory.J. Funct. Anal., 275(11):2917–2977, 2018. BIBLIOGRAPHY109

    2018

  30. [31]

    Beckus, J

    S. Beckus, J. Bellissard, and G. De Nittis. Spectral continuity for aperiodic quantum systems: applications of a folklore theorem.J. Math. Phys., 61(12):123505, 19, 2020. doi:10.1063/5.0011488

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0011488 2020

  31. [32]

    Beckus, J

    S. Beckus, J. Bellissard, and Y. Thomas. Spectral regularity and defects for the Kohmoto model.Ann. Henri Poincar´ e, 2025. doi:10.1007/s00023-025-01578-8

    work page doi:10.1007/s00023-025-01578-8 2025

  32. [33]

    Beckus and B

    S. Beckus and B. Devyver. Generalized eigenfunctions and eigenvalues: a uni- fying framework for Shnol-type theorems.J. Anal. Math., 146(1):165–203, 2022. doi:10.1007/s11854-021-0191-2

    work page doi:10.1007/s11854-021-0191-2 2022

  33. [34]

    Beckus and L

    S. Beckus and L. Eliaz. Eigenfunctions growth ofR-limits on graphs.J. Spectr. Theory, 11(4):1895–1933, 2021. doi:10.4171/jst/389

    work page doi:10.4171/jst/389 1933

  34. [35]

    Beckus, T

    S. Beckus, T. Hartnick, and F. Pogorzelski. Symbolic substitution systems beyond abelian groups, 2021. arXiv:2410.17722

    work page arXiv 2021

  35. [36]

    Beckus, T

    S. Beckus, T. Hartnick, and F. Pogorzelski. Linear repetitivity beyond abelian groups.Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems, 45(7):1947 – 1997, 2025. doi:10.1017/etds.2024.120

    work page doi:10.1017/etds.2024.120 1947

  36. [37]

    Beckus, D

    S. Beckus, D. Lenz, M. Lindner, and C. Seifert. On the spectrum of operator families on discrete groups over minimal dynamical systems.Math. Z., 287(3-4):993–1007,

  37. [38]

    doi:10.1007/s00209-017-1856-5

    work page doi:10.1007/s00209-017-1856-5

  38. [39]

    Beckus, D

    S. Beckus, D. Lenz, M. Lindner, and C. Seifert. Note on spectra of non-selfadjoint operators over dynamical systems.Proc. Edinb. Math. Soc. (2), 61(2):371–386, 2018

    2018

  39. [40]

    Beckus and Y

    S. Beckus and Y. Pinchover. Shnol-type theorem for the Agmon ground state.J. Spectr. Theory, 10(2):355–377, 2020. doi:10.4171/JST/296

    work page doi:10.4171/jst/296 2020

  40. [41]

    Beckus and F

    S. Beckus and F. Pogorzelski. Spectrum of Lebesgue measure zero for Ja- cobi matrices of quasicrystals.Math. Phys. Anal. Geom., 16(3):289–308, 2013. doi:10.1007/s11040-013-9131-4

    work page doi:10.1007/s11040-013-9131-4 2013

  41. [42]

    Beckus and F

    S. Beckus and F. Pogorzelski. Delone dynamical systems and spectral convergence. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems, 40(6):1510–1544, 2020. doi:10.1017/etds.2018.116

    work page doi:10.1017/etds.2018.116 2020

  42. [43]

    Beckus and A

    S. Beckus and A. Takase. Spectral estimates of dynamically-defined and amenable operator families.J. Spectr. Theory, 15(2):563–610, 2025. doi:10.4171/JST/554

    work page doi:10.4171/jst/554 2025

  43. [44]

    Beckus, J

    S. Beckus, J. van Velthoven, and U. Enstad. Deformations of frames and bases via continuous fields of groupoids. in preparation

  44. [45]

    B´ edaride and A

    N. B´ edaride and A. Hilion. Geometric realizations of two-dimensional substitutive tilings.Q. J. Math., 64(4):955–979, 2013. doi:10.1093/qmath/has025

    work page doi:10.1093/qmath/has025 2013

  45. [46]

    Bellissard.Schr¨ odinger operators with almost periodic potential: An overview

    J. Bellissard.Schr¨ odinger operators with almost periodic potential: An overview. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1982. Schrader, R. and Seiler, R. and Uhlenbrock, D. A

    1982

  46. [47]

    Bellissard.K-theory ofC ∗-algebras in solid state physics

    J. Bellissard.K-theory ofC ∗-algebras in solid state physics. InStatistical mechanics and field theory: mathematical aspects (Groningen, 1985), volume 257 ofLecture Notes in Phys., pages 99–156. Springer, Berlin, 1986. doi:10.1007/3-540-16777-3 74. 110BIBLIOGRAPHY

    work page doi:10.1007/3-540-16777-3 1985

  47. [48]

    Bellissard

    J. Bellissard. Gap Labelling Theorems for Schr¨ odinger operators. InFrom number theory to physics (Les Houches, 1989), pages 538–630. Springer, Berlin, 1992

    1989

  48. [49]

    Bellissard

    J. Bellissard. Lipshitz continuity of gap boundaries for Hofstadter-like spectra. Comm. Math. Phys., 160(3):599–613, 1994

    1994

  49. [50]

    Bellissard

    J. Bellissard. Delone sets and material science: a program. InMathematics of aperiodic order, volume 309 ofProgr. Math., pages 405–428. Birkh¨ auser/Springer, Basel, 2015

    2015

  50. [51]

    Bellissard, A

    J. Bellissard, A. Bovier, and J.-M. Ghez. Gap labelling theorems for one-dimensional discrete Schr¨ odinger operators.Rev. Math. Phys., 4(1):1–37, 1992

    1992

  51. [52]

    Bellissard, B

    J. Bellissard, B. Iochum, E. Scoppola, and D. Testard. Spectral properties of one- dimensional quasi-crystals.Comm. Math. Phys., 125(3):527–543, 1989

    1989

  52. [53]

    Bellissard, B

    J. Bellissard, B. Iochum, and D. Testard. Continuity properties of the electronic spectrum of 1d quasicrystals.Comm. Math. Phys., 141(2):353–380, 1991

    1991

  53. [54]

    Bellissard and B

    J. Bellissard and B. Simon. Cantor spectrum for the almost Mathieu equation.J. Functional Analysis, 48(3):408–419, 1982. doi:10.1016/0022-1236(82)90094-5

    work page doi:10.1016/0022-1236(82)90094-5 1982

  54. [55]

    A. Besbes. Uniform ergodic theorems on aperiodic linearly repeti- tive tilings and applications.Rev. Math. Phys., 20(5):597–623, 2008. doi:10.1142/S0129055X0800333X

    work page doi:10.1142/s0129055x0800333x 2008

  55. [56]

    Besbes, M

    A. Besbes, M. Boshernitzan, and D. Lenz. Delone sets with finite local complexity: linear repetitivity versus positivity of weights.Discrete Comput. Geom., 49(2):335– 347, 2013. doi:10.1007/s00454-012-9455-z

    work page doi:10.1007/s00454-012-9455-z 2013

  56. [57]

    B. Biber. Github, Kohmoto butterfly. https://github.com/DaAnIV/Quasiperiodic, 2022

    2022

  57. [58]

    Biringer

    I. Biringer. Metrizing the Chabauty topology.Geom. Dedicata, 195:19–22, 2018. doi:10.1007/s10711-017-0274-5

    work page doi:10.1007/s10711-017-0274-5 2018

  58. [59]

    Biroli and U

    M. Biroli and U. Mosco. A Saint-Venant type principle for Dirichlet forms on discontinuous media.Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. (4), 169:125–181, 1995. doi:10.1007/BF01759352

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01759352 1995

  59. [60]

    Bj¨ orklund and T

    M. Bj¨ orklund and T. Hartnick. Approximate lattices.Duke Math. J., 167(15):2903– 2964, 2018. doi:10.1215/00127094-2018-0028

    work page doi:10.1215/00127094-2018-0028 2018

  60. [61]

    Bj¨ orklund, T

    M. Bj¨ orklund, T. Hartnick, and F. Pogorzelski. Aperiodic order and spherical diffraction, I: auto-correlation of regular model sets.Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3), 116(4):957–996, 2018. doi:10.1112/plms.12091

    work page doi:10.1112/plms.12091 2018

  61. [62]

    Bj¨ orklund, T

    M. Bj¨ orklund, T. Hartnick, and F. Pogorzelski. Aperiodic order and spherical diffraction, III: the shadow transform and the diffraction formula.J. Funct. Anal., 281(12):Paper No. 109265, 59, 2021. doi:10.1016/j.jfa.2021.109265

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jfa.2021.109265 2021

  62. [64]

    Bj¨ orklund, T

    M. Bj¨ orklund, T. Hartnick, and F. Pogorzelski. Aperiodic order and spheri- cal diffraction, II: translation bounded measures on homogeneous spaces, 2022. doi:10.1007/s00209-021-02817-4

    work page doi:10.1007/s00209-021-02817-4 2022

  63. [65]

    Boshernitzan

    M. Boshernitzan. A unique ergodicity of minimal symbolic flows with linear block growth.J. Analyse Math., 44:77–96, 1984/85

    1984

  64. [66]

    Boutet de Monvel, D

    A. Boutet de Monvel, D. Lenz, and P. Stollmann. Sch’nol’s theorem for strongly local forms.Israel J. Math., 173:189–211, 2009. doi:10.1007/s11856-009-0088-8

    work page doi:10.1007/s11856-009-0088-8 2009

  65. [67]

    Boutet de Monvel and P

    A. Boutet de Monvel and P. Stollmann. Eigenfunction expansions for gen- erators of Dirichlet forms.J. Reine Angew. Math., 561:131–144, 2003. doi:10.1515/crll.2003.063

    work page doi:10.1515/crll.2003.063 2003

  66. [68]

    Breuer, S

    J. Breuer, S. Denisov, and L. Eliaz. On the essential spectrum of Schr¨ odinger operators on trees.Math. Phys. Anal. Geom., 21(4):Paper No. 33, 25, 2018. doi:10.1007/s11040-018-9290-4

    work page doi:10.1007/s11040-018-9290-4 2018

  67. [69]

    R. Brooks. The spectral geometry ofk-regular graphs.J. Anal. Math., 57:120–151,

  68. [70]

    doi:10.1007/BF03041067

    work page doi:10.1007/bf03041067

  69. [71]

    Butkevich.Convergence of averages in ergodic theory

    S. Butkevich.Convergence of averages in ergodic theory. PhD thesis, Ohio State University, 2001

    2001

  70. [72]

    Cao and Y

    J. Cao and Y. Qu. Almost sure dimensional properties for the spectrum and the density of states of Sturmian Hamiltonians.Adv. Math., 478:Paper No. 110387, 74, 2025

    2025

  71. [73]

    Casdagli

    M. Casdagli. Symbolic dynamics for the renormalization map of a quasiperiodic Schr¨ odinger equation.Comm. Math. Phys., 107(2):295–318, 1986

    1986

  72. [74]

    Castaing and M

    C. Castaing and M. Valadier.Convex analysis and measurable multifunctions. Lec- ture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 580. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1977

    1977

  73. [75]

    Cedzich and J

    C. Cedzich and J. Fillman. Absence of bound states for quantum walks and CMV matrices via reflections.J. Spectr. Theory, 14(4):1513–1536, 2024. doi:10.4171/jst/533

    work page doi:10.4171/jst/533 2024

  74. [76]

    Cedzich, J

    C. Cedzich, J. Fillman, T. Geib, and A. H. Werner. Singular continuous Cantor spectrum for magnetic quantum walks.Lett. Math. Phys., 110(6):1141–1158, 2020. doi:10.1007/s11005-020-01257-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s11005-020-01257-1 2020

  75. [77]

    Cedzich, J

    C. Cedzich, J. Fillman, and D. C. Ong. Almost everything about the unitary almost Mathieu operator.Comm. Math. Phys., 403(2):745–794, 2023. doi:10.1007/s00220- 023-04808-4

    work page doi:10.1007/s00220- 2023

  76. [78]

    Cedzich and L

    C. Cedzich and L. Li. Twenty dry Martinis for the unitary almost-Mathieu operator. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems, 46(4):903–920, 2026

    2026

  77. [79]

    Chabauty

    C. Chabauty. Limite d’ensembles et g´ eom´ etrie des nombres.Bull. Soc. Math. France, 78:143–151, 1950

    1950

  78. [80]

    S. N. Chandler-Wilde and M. Lindner. Limit operators, collective compactness, and the spectral theory of infinite matrices.Mem. Amer. Math. Soc., 210(989):viii+111,

  79. [81]

    112BIBLIOGRAPHY

    doi:10.1090/S0065-9266-2010-00626-4. 112BIBLIOGRAPHY

    work page doi:10.1090/s0065-9266-2010-00626-4 2010

  80. [82]

    M. D. Choi, G. A. Elliott, and N. Yui. Gauss polynomials and the rotation algebra. Invent. Math., 99(2):225–246, 1990. doi:10.1007/BF01234419

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01234419 1990

Showing first 80 references.