Pith. sign in

Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

A Grading Rubric for AI Safety Frameworks

As of 21 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 8 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2409.08751.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2409.08751 v1

Coverage vector

measured 0 of 0 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links

measured 8 of 8 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00

measured 8 of 8 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-16T12:24:06.247604Z

measured 0 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: arxiv_reference, observed 2026-05-11T20:21:08.798247Z

Reference resolution

0 of 0 outbound references displayed

  • verified exact0
  • verified fuzzy0
  • unresolved0
  • parse uncertain0
  • malformed identifier0
  • metadata mismatch0

External citation measurements

No source-named external measurement is stored.

Outbound references

No outbound reference observations are available for this paper version.

Pith citing papers

Observation 8aed8033-90fc-4a99-8926-cfba5c2ddcdb · inbound

AI Safety Frameworks Should Include Procedures for Model Access Decisions cites this paper.

AI Safety Frameworks Should Include Procedures for Model Access Decisions A Grading Rubric for AI Safety Frameworks

Reference 12

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-12T19:37:34.811201Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-12T19:37:34.811201Z digest=sha256:e61ee8504747e3382a47758bfbc76596aba2b2aa9823b349192f9640598f6d14

Observation ab677f20-467b-4de2-8914-10633dda731e · inbound

Position Paper: Model Access should be a Key Concern in AI Governance cites this paper.

Position Paper: Model Access should be a Key Concern in AI Governance A Grading Rubric for AI Safety Frameworks

Reference 59

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-12T05:00:04.334996Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-12T05:00:04.334996Z digest=sha256:a8494025733e7150e7b80ffbb37eb5c255135fb782aebfec6e8408b7825679fa

Observation e3ba9394-c2d3-4c3a-89e5-611c8507c9f6 · inbound

Towards Frontier Safety Policies Plus cites this paper.

Towards Frontier Safety Policies Plus A Grading Rubric for AI Safety Frameworks

Reference 2024

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-10T12:52:08.886513Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-10T12:52:08.886513Z digest=sha256:a60487296f6410302b7d6098269a35a09405163aa90ea5ca3d7dcdae99b61a43

Observation 787bf210-8ddb-4794-ac72-77d5b6e76833 · inbound

Emerging Practices in Frontier AI Safety Frameworks cites this paper.

Emerging Practices in Frontier AI Safety Frameworks A Grading Rubric for AI Safety Frameworks

Reference 1

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-09T04:13:24.033271Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-09T04:13:24.033271Z digest=sha256:22a8b013dc4cecf62715032527fc178ed37367ab4db99ff6319f61fa07ea8165

Observation a453beb7-4050-4d33-acca-44b3cc757f51 · inbound

In Which Areas of Technical AI Safety Could Geopolitical Rivals Cooperate? cites this paper.

In Which Areas of Technical AI Safety Could Geopolitical Rivals Cooperate? A Grading Rubric for AI Safety Frameworks

Reference 6

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-16T12:24:06.247604Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-16T12:24:06.247604Z digest=sha256:0d179e8faf2182b64ecd50a10bc476ec152bbe309e7c438972d9f225ca564308

Observation 08c1c646-06ed-4ccd-a7f3-1e61cd5fdc1d · inbound

Third-party compliance reviews for frontier AI safety frameworks cites this paper.

Third-party compliance reviews for frontier AI safety frameworks A Grading Rubric for AI Safety Frameworks

Reference 4

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-16T04:17:18.334327Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-16T04:17:18.334327Z digest=sha256:7094bc7ac80cec232cc07460e1676e9649749a56b08a6a0f6793d8d53c968d08

Observation 4d709654-3fcc-4609-8f29-8950df6daced · inbound

Bridging AI and Software Security: A Comparative Vulnerability Assessment of LLM Agent Deployment Paradigms cites this paper.

Bridging AI and Software Security: A Comparative Vulnerability Assessment of LLM Agent Deployment Paradigms A Grading Rubric for AI Safety Frameworks

Reference 39

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T19:12:23.477658Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-06T19:12:23.477658Z digest=sha256:9b90195077d3e2d8640ed09e9e1edab68ff025ef69b41b1464e331d30dc07aa6

Observation ef8e65f0-ec1f-41b9-aa26-4c4fbf8f70cd · inbound

What Should Frontier AI Developers Disclose About Internal Deployments? cites this paper.

What Should Frontier AI Developers Disclose About Internal Deployments? A Grading Rubric for AI Safety Frameworks

Reference 4

Resolution
verified exact
arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-11T20:21:08.801845Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-05-08T09:33:47.869030Z digest=sha256:7515877001484fb64182b8b18a6c3c495d0e34ae140a74d1154ecc13f2bc8cff