Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links
Paper Citation Record · LEDGER
As of 21 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 8 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2409.08751.
A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.
Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links
One-hop event checks from named stored sources.
Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00
Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-16T12:24:06.247604Z
A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.
Source: arxiv_reference, observed 2026-05-11T20:21:08.798247Z
0 of 0 outbound references displayed
External citation measurements
No source-named external measurement is stored.
No outbound reference observations are available for this paper version.
Observation 8aed8033-90fc-4a99-8926-cfba5c2ddcdb · inbound
AI Safety Frameworks Should Include Procedures for Model Access Decisions A Grading Rubric for AI Safety Frameworks
Reference 12
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation ab677f20-467b-4de2-8914-10633dda731e · inbound
Position Paper: Model Access should be a Key Concern in AI Governance A Grading Rubric for AI Safety Frameworks
Reference 59
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation e3ba9394-c2d3-4c3a-89e5-611c8507c9f6 · inbound
Towards Frontier Safety Policies Plus A Grading Rubric for AI Safety Frameworks
Reference 2024
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 787bf210-8ddb-4794-ac72-77d5b6e76833 · inbound
Emerging Practices in Frontier AI Safety Frameworks A Grading Rubric for AI Safety Frameworks
Reference 1
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation a453beb7-4050-4d33-acca-44b3cc757f51 · inbound
In Which Areas of Technical AI Safety Could Geopolitical Rivals Cooperate? A Grading Rubric for AI Safety Frameworks
Reference 6
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 08c1c646-06ed-4ccd-a7f3-1e61cd5fdc1d · inbound
Third-party compliance reviews for frontier AI safety frameworks A Grading Rubric for AI Safety Frameworks
Reference 4
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 4d709654-3fcc-4609-8f29-8950df6daced · inbound
Bridging AI and Software Security: A Comparative Vulnerability Assessment of LLM Agent Deployment Paradigms A Grading Rubric for AI Safety Frameworks
Reference 39
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation ef8e65f0-ec1f-41b9-aa26-4c4fbf8f70cd · inbound
What Should Frontier AI Developers Disclose About Internal Deployments? A Grading Rubric for AI Safety Frameworks
Reference 4
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00.