Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 67 references

Iron K$\alpha$ signatures from accretion disks around fermionic dark matter cores

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A non-rotating ball of dark-matter fermions can produce the broad, skewed iron K-alpha line usually read as the signature of a rapidly spinning black hole's accretion disk.

desk verdict Useful existence proof that non-rotating RAR cores can mimic retrograde-spin Kerr iron lines, but the MCG-06-30-15 match is an eyeball fit with a free inner disk radius, so treat the observational claim as exploratory. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.03797 v1 pith:UNAZVNAS submitted 2026-08-04 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.GA

V. Crespi , F. L. Vieyro , C. R. Argüelles , J. A. Rueda This is my paper
classification astro-ph.HEastro-ph.GA
keywords ironK-alphalinebroadfermionicdarkmattercoresRARmodelaccretiondiskraytracingMCG-06-30-15blackholealternatives
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to show that the broad, skewed iron K-alpha line long read as the calling card of a rapidly spinning supermassive black hole can also be emitted by a non-rotating, horizonless object: a dense degenerate core of fermionic dark matter blending into a dilute halo, described by the extended RAR model. Using ray tracing in this spacetime, it finds that the most compact allowed cores, with compactness u = u_cr = 0.128, broaden the line about as much as near-maximally rotating black holes do, and that gas orbiting inside one gravitational radius produces flattened profiles with a weakened blue peak that no Kerr black hole can produce. Applied to MCG-06-30-15, the near-critical RAR configuration reproduces the observed broad Fe K-alpha features without an event horizon or a central spin parameter. If this holds, iron-line spectroscopy alone cannot uniquely identify black holes, and independent spin measurements become necessary to tell the two pictures apart.

What carries the argument

The RAR fermion-core spacetime: self-gravitating neutral fermions with a Fermi-Dirac-like distribution containing an energy cutoff, solved in general relativity with Tolman-Klein equilibrium, yielding a dense degenerate core of roughly 3.5-7 x 10^6 solar masses that continuously transitions into an extended dark-matter halo. Its compactness u = M/R has a critical value u_cr = 0.128 just before collapse. The property that carries the argument is the absence of an ISCO and an event horizon: stable circular orbits (and hence a thin alpha-disk) can extend inward to the binding-energy saturation radius r_sat, and it is this innermost emitting region, with its reduced orbital velocities, that sets

What would settle it

Take a source whose black-hole spin is measured independently of the iron line and compare: if its broad line requires a near-critical RAR fit with r_in = r_sat while the high-resolution line shape (e.g., the blue horn and the 6.4-7 keV residuals) disagrees, the no-horizon interpretation loses. Concretely, high-resolution XRISM spectra of MCG-06-30-15 should either reveal the predicted flattened sub-r_g emission component or, if that component is absent and the inner radius must be moved outward, rule out the critical RAR explanation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the shape of a relativistically broadened iron line does not by itself distinguish a Kerr black hole from a compact, non-rotating fermionic dark-matter core in the extended RAR model. In this spacetime, stable circular orbits extend far inside the core because there is no innermost stable circular orbit, and the radiative efficiency saturates at r_sat, roughly a tenth of the core radius. When the accretion disk reaches that inner edge, the most compact configurations (u/u_cr = 1) generate red wings and blue horns comparable to those of rapidly rotating prograde black holes; decreasing the compactness moves the red-wing onset to higher energies and tracks ret

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that ordinary gas can keep orbiting and emitting down to about a tenth of the dark-matter core radius (r_sat); the RAR spacetime has no innermost stable orbit, so this chosen inner edge creates the deep red wings, and if real disks are truncated farther out, or baryons cannot penetrate the collisionless core, the black-hole-like iron lines disappear.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A non-rotating fermionic core with u = u_cr produces iron-line broadening comparable to that of near-maximally rotating black holes, so broad lines cannot by themselves prove a black hole is present.
  • The near-critical RAR configuration reproduces the observed broad Fe K-alpha of MCG-06-30-15 without invoking an event horizon or a central spin parameter, so the high spin inferred for that source is model-dependent.
  • Matter emitting from radii below one gravitational radius creates flattened profiles with a weakened blue peak, a spectral shape with no analogue in the Kerr black hole scenario.
  • The compactness of the core spans the same red-wing trend as Kerr spin: lower compactness mimics retrograde spins, and matching the broadest observed wings requires near-critical compactness.
  • Independent spin measurements are necessary to break the degeneracy between a spinning black hole and a compact non-rotating dark-matter core.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If magnetic or radiative truncation of real disks keeps gas outside r_sat, the black-hole-like red wings vanish; coupling this line model to magnetically arrested or radiation-pressure-truncated disk models would test that fragility directly.
  • The same degeneracy should affect other relativistic reflection diagnostics, such as the iron K edge and the Compton reflection continuum, so a joint broad-band fit of the full 0.1-50 keV reflection spectrum could separate core compactness from spin more sharply than the line alone.
  • High-resolution microcalorimeter spectra of MCG-06-30-15 might detect the predicted sub-r_g features, which no Kerr model can produce; their absence would falsify the strongest RAR fit.
  • If this interpretation is correct, some of the scatter in AGN spin measurements from iron lines could reflect variation in core compactness rather than rotation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper computes relativistic Fe K-alpha line profiles from geometrically thin accretion disks in the spherically symmetric extended RAR fermionic dark-matter spacetime, using the public ray-tracing code Skylight. It considers two emissivity prescriptions (lamp-post corona and power-law) and compares the resulting profiles with Schwarzschild and Kerr black-hole predictions. The authors find that the most compact RAR cores (u/u_cr close to 1) produce broad, skewed lines reminiscent of rotating black holes, and that near-critical cores can reproduce the broad iron-line features observed in MCG-06-30-15 from XMM-Newton data. They conclude that iron-line spectroscopy alone does not uniquely identify black holes. The manuscript includes a new observational application to archival XMM-Newton data, but the comparison is carried out by visual selection of model parameters without formal statistical fitting.

Significance. If the claimed degeneracy between non-rotating RAR cores and rapidly rotating Kerr black holes holds, the paper would strengthen an important caveat for spin measurements from iron-line spectroscopy. The computational part is credible: Skylight is a public, validated code, the metric is taken from a previously published model, and the paper shows a systematic scan over compactness, inclination, corona height, and inner radius. The new calculation of line profiles in the RAR background extends earlier work on disk spectra and images. However, the central observational claim rests on a qualitative fit with several free parameters, and the paper itself acknowledges unmodeled residuals near 7 keV. The strength of the result therefore depends on whether the visual agreement can be made quantitative and whether the inner-disk edge is physically justified.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4, Figs. 9–10, Table 3] The central claim of agreement with MCG-06-30-15 is supported only by visually selected model lines. No goodness-of-fit statistic (e.g., χ²/dof), parameter uncertainties, or comparison with a standard Kerr reflection model on the same data is given. The residuals in both figures show unmodeled structure, and the text attributes features near 7 keV to Kβ/ionized lines. Please provide a quantitative spectral fit (including the line normalization and continuum uncertainties) and compare the RAR model against a canonical relativistic reflection model such as relxill. As it stands, the 'good agreement' is an existence proof, not a validated alternative.
  2. [§2.2, Eq. (7), Table 1; §3.1–3.2, Figs. 2–8] The r_sat radius estimated from binding-energy saturation (0.7–2.1 M_c) is not the inner radius used in the profiles that drive the BH-mimicry and MCG fits; those use R_in = r_c (7.8–24.4 M_c) or R_in = 6–9 M_c (Table 3, Figs. 2–3). Because the RAR spacetime has no ISCO, R_in is effectively a free parameter, and Fig. 8 shows that the line profile is highly sensitive to it. The paper does not provide a physical mechanism that truncates the baryonic disk near r_c; a transparent core would allow gas to spiral inward, where orbital velocities drop and the line flattens (Fig. 6). Thus the claimed degeneracy is carried by an ad hoc boundary condition rather than a predictive property of the model.
  3. [§3.1, Figs. 3–4; Abstract and §5] The abstract claims broadening comparable to rapidly rotating black holes, but the systematic comparison in Figs. 3–4 shows equivalence only with retrograde Kerr (a<0), and the discussion concedes that extreme prograde Kerr red wings (a≳0.9) are not reproduced. Since MCG-06-30-15 is modeled in the literature with high prograde spin, the visual agreement in §4 is not connected to the parameter region actually shown to mimic Kerr. This overstates the main result and should be rephrased or supported by a direct comparison with a high-spin prograde Kerr model.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Throughout] Typos and notation: 'mimmic' in the Abstract; 'it's' in Sec. 2.1; 'dash-doted' in the Fig. 2 caption; 'V o lkoff' in the references; inconsistent use of R_in vs Rin; missing spaces in Table 1 entries.
  2. [§2.2, Eq. (7)] The definition of r_sat as the point where the efficiency varies by less than 1% is somewhat arbitrary. Please state the numerical criterion more precisely, e.g., the radial interval over which the derivative drops below a given tolerance, since the inner edge is important for the phenomenology.
  3. [§4] The continuum fit excludes the 3.5–7.5 keV band but includes 7.5–10.5 keV; the residual reflection continuum and absorption features may affect the derived line profile. A short discussion of systematic uncertainties from the continuum placement would improve reliability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the iron-line computation is a new forward ray-tracing calculation, though the MCG-06-30-15 agreement is a by-eye fit over free disk parameters.

full rationale

The central line-profile calculation is not circular by construction: the RAR metric from prior work is an input spacetime, and Skylight (an independent code) integrates null geodesics to produce Fe Kα profiles (Eqs. 12-15). The comparison with Kerr is a forward computation over a parameter grid (Figs. 2-4). The MCG-06-30-15 section fits free geometric parameters (i, h, R_in, γ; Table 3) to the observed line after continuum subtraction, so the 'good agreement' is an existence proof/degeneracy demonstration, not a free prediction; the paper itself labels it 'initial exploration' and 'phenomenological'. This is a model-fitting caveat, not a circular reduction. The paper relies on self-citations for the RAR model and its stability (Argüelles et al. 2021; Millauro et al. 2024), but these are not load-bearing for the new ray-tracing result, and the code and X-ray data are external. No equation reduces to its input by definition; the inner-radius ambiguity is an acknowledged physical uncertainty, not a circular step.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The RAR metric, the disk model, and the inner radius choice are the main external inputs. The compactness and geometric parameters (h, i, R_in, gamma) are tuned in the MCG fit, so the observational agreement is a fit rather than a prediction.

free parameters (6)
  • Fermion mass m_f (sets core compactness u/u_cr) = 300-378 keV; u/u_cr = 0.32, 0.57, 0.70, 1.00
    Compactness determines the line profile. Near-critical values are chosen for the MCG-06-30-15 match, so it acts as a fitted parameter in the observational comparison.
  • Corona height h = 3, 5, 11, 18 M_c
    Tuned per fit (Table 3) to shape the emissivity profile.
  • Inclination angle i = 29-44 degrees
    Adjusted to match observed line in Table 3.
  • Inner disk radius R_in = r_sat (0.71-2.09 M_c), 3 M_c, 6 M_c, r_c
    The ad hoc saturation radius sets the innermost emitting region; different values are explored and selected in fits.
  • Power-law emissivity index gamma = 2-6
    In the phenomenological prescription (Eq. 11), gamma weights innermost disk emission; fitted values 4-6 for MCG.
  • Continuum photon index Gamma = 1.995 +- 0.026
    Fit to the off-line X-ray continuum (Table 2); enters the lamp-post emissivity.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption RAR spacetime metric and core-halo solutions from prior papers (Ruffini et al. 2015; Argüelles et al. 2018, 2021)
    The central calculation assumes this metric without re-deriving it; the solutions are not independently re-examined here.
  • domain assumption The fermionic dark matter is a perfect fluid in thermodynamic equilibrium
    Basis of the RAR model (Sec. 2.1).
  • domain assumption Near-critical cores are thermodynamically stable and long-lived
    Needed to justify using u near u_cr; stability is cited to Argüelles et al. 2021, not shown here.
  • domain assumption Thin alpha disk with Keplerian circular orbits and local blackbody emission
    Standard accretion model from Shakura-Sunyaev as adapted in Millauro et al. 2024 (Sec. 2.2).
  • ad hoc to paper Inner disk radius set by binding-energy saturation (r_sat)
    The spacetime has no ISCO; this choice generates the sub-core emission features central to the results (Sec. 2.2).
  • domain assumption The disk is in the cold regime emitting Fe K-alpha at 6.4 keV
    Assumes ionization parameter below threshold (Sec. 2.3).
  • domain assumption Continuum described by tbabs*powerlaw in off-line bands
    Standard X-ray spectral modeling for the MCG-06-30-15 fit (Sec. 4).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Iron K$\alpha$ signatures from accretion disks around fermionic dark matter cores." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UNAZVNAS

@misc{pith2026260803797,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Iron K$\alpha$ signatures from accretion disks around fermionic dark matter cores},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UNAZVNAS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.03797}
}
abstract

The fluorescent iron line and its broadening due to relativistic effects are excellent probes to study the inner part of an accretion disk and the space-time geometry near the compact object. We investigate the iron K$\alpha$ line profile within the extended RAR model, which describes a fermionic dark matter distribution on galaxy scales. The most general solutions are characterized by a compact and highly degenerate core able to mimic the central black hole, transitioning into an extended halo composed of the same particles. We aim to contrast the resulting line morphologies in this scenario with those predicted by the standard Kerr black hole paradigm. Special attention will be given to MCG-06-30-15 galaxy. We compute the line profile using the numerical ray-tracing code, Skylight. We consider two distinct configurations for the emissivity of the cold accretion disk: an irradiation profile based on the lamp-post corona prescription, and a phenomenological power-law profile. The resulting profiles exhibit a diverse phenomenology. In particular, the most compact fermion cores produce a line broadening comparable to that observed in rapidly rotating black holes. The presence of emitting matter at radii smaller than a gravitational radius yields distinctive spectral features that are entirely absent in the black hole scenario. For MCG-06-30-15 galaxy, we find a good agreement with the observed broad features of the iron line profile, provided the compactness of the fermion core is close to critical. These results reinforce the need for independent black hole spin measurements. Combined with such constraints, iron-line spectroscopy may provide a powerful observational tool to distinguish black holes from alternative compact solutions, in particular compact fermionic dark-matter cores.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.03797 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Comparison of the mass density profiles used in this work, in terms of fractional compactness to the critic one ucr = 0.128 (maximum allowed). The zoomed panel shows the locations of the corresponding cores with colored dots. ρ(r) and r are scaled with fixed plateau density ρpl (gray horizontal line) and core mass Mc values, these are the same for all solutions. The global scale of these core-halo configurations cor… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Fe Kα emission lines (E0 = 6.4 keV) for fermionic DM models with different compactness. Solid lines correspond to accretion disks with inner radius equal to the core radius Rin = rc , and dash lines correspond to disks with inner radius equal to Rin = 6Mc . The corresponding values are listed in table (1). From top row to bottom row we decrease the compactness from the critic one. Every column corresponds to differe… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Fe Kα emission lines (E0 = 6.4 keV) for Kerr BH with different spin parameter in gray palette, and fermionic DM models with different compactness in colored lines. All inner disk radius correspond to rISCO of Kerr BH with retrograde rotation sense, and core radius in the case of disks around fermionic cores Rin = rc . From left to right we increase the inclination angle of the observer’s line of sight to the disk ax… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Trends in the red-wing extent, characterized by the onset energy (Emin [keV]) of the line profile, at a fixed inclination angle i = 45◦ . The blue line corresponds to the top x-axis as a function of the spin param￾eter for Kerr solutions, while the purple line correspo…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Fe Kα line profiles within the lamp-post corona prescription as we vary the corona height h, for the same background of 0.7ucr and same inclination angle i = 45◦ . We show different values of the inner radius Rin in the three panels. The emissivity profiles correspond …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Fe Kα line profiles for disks with power-law emissivity functions of index γ. These lines are computed for i = 45◦ inclination angle under a background metric given by the most compact regular solution ucr. In the different panels we change the onset of the accretion d…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Fe Kα line profiles obtained for a disk intensity I(r) ∝ r −3 , as a function of the inner radius of the accretion disk. All cases are for i = 45◦ , and for the critical compactness of the DM core ucr. associated with the RAR distribution modifies both the orbital velo…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Line emission fits in the lamp-post corona prescription. Red lines correspond to a background generated by the critic compactness config￾uration ucr, and green lines correspond to 0.7ucr. We vary on the geo￾metrical parameters i, h and Rin to adjust the line. Values ob…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Line emission fits in the phenomenological Power Law pre￾scription. Pink lines correspond to a background generated by the critic compactness configuration ucr, and blue lines correspond to 0.7ucr. We vary on the geometrical parameters i, γ and Rin to adjust the line.…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    R., Díaz, M

    Argüelles, C. R., Díaz, M. I., Krut, A., & Yunis, R. 2021, MNRAS, 502, 4227 Argüelles, C. R., Krut, A., Rueda, J. A., & Ruffini, R. 2018, Physics of the Dark Universe, 21, 82 Argüelles, C. R., Krut, A., Rueda, J. A., & Ruffini, R. 2019a, International Jour- nal of Modern Physics D, 28, 1943003 Argüelles, C. R., Krut, A., Rueda, J. A., & Ruffini, R. 2019b,...

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    Arnaud, K. A. 1996, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol. 101, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V , ed. Jacoby, G. H. & Barnes, J., 17

    work page 1996

  3. [3]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2408.12262

    Bambi, C. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2408.12262

    arXiv 2024

  4. [4]

    W., Dauser, T., et al

    Bambi, C., Brenneman, L. W., Dauser, T., et al. 2021, Space Sci. Rev., 217, 65

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    & Malafarina, D

    Bambi, C. & Malafarina, D. 2013, Phys. Rev. D, 88, 064022

    work page 2013

  6. [6]

    A., Argüelles, C

    Becerra-Vergara, E. A., Argüelles, C. R., Krut, A., Rueda, J. A., & Ruffini, R. 2020, A&A, 641, A34

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    A., Argüelles, C

    Becerra-Vergara, E. A., Argüelles, C. R., Krut, A., Rueda, J. A., & Ruffini, R. 2021, MNRAS, 505, L64

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Bezanson, J., Edelman, A., Karpinski, S., & Shah, V . B. 2017, SIAM Review, 59, 65 Bili´c, N. & Viollier, R. D. 1999, European Physical Journal C, 11, 173

    work page 2017

Show all 67 references
  1. [9]

    Brenneman, L. W. & Reynolds, C. S. 2006, ApJ, 652, 1028

    2006

  2. [10]

    W., Wilkins, D

    Brenneman, L. W., Wilkins, D. R., Ogorzałek, A., et al. 2025, ApJ, 995, 200

    2025

  3. [11]

    Buchdahl, H. A. 1959, Physical Review, 116, 1027

    1959

  4. [12]

    1998, MNRAS, 300, 981

    Chavanis, P.-H. 1998, MNRAS, 300, 981

    1998

  5. [13]

    2022, Phys

    Chavanis, P.-H. 2022, Phys. Rev. D, 106, 043538

    2022

  6. [14]

    & Alberti, G

    Chavanis, P.-H. & Alberti, G. 2020, Physics Letters B, 801, 135155

    2020

  7. [15]

    F., & Argüelles, C

    Collazo, S., Mestre, M. F., & Argüelles, C. R. 2025, A&A, 699, A315

    2025

  8. [16]

    R., Becerra-Vergara, E

    Crespi, V ., Argüelles, C. R., Becerra-Vergara, E. A., et al. 2026, MNRAS, 546, staf1854

    2026

  9. [17]

    R., & Rueda, J

    Crespi, V ., Argüelles, C. R., & Rueda, J. A. 2025, Phys. Rev. D, 112, 023041

    2025

  10. [18]

    2013, MNRAS, 430, 1694

    Dauser, T., Garcia, J., Wilms, J., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 430, 1694

    2013

  11. [19]

    Fabian, A. C. 2012, ARA&A, 50, 455

    2012

  12. [20]

    C., Iwasawa, K., Reynolds, C

    Fabian, A. C., Iwasawa, K., Reynolds, C. S., & Young, A. J. 2000, PASP, 112, 1145

    2000

  13. [21]

    C., Rees, M

    Fabian, A. C., Rees, M. J., Stella, L., & White, N. E. 1989, MNRAS, 238, 729

    1989

  14. [22]

    Fabian, A. C. & Vaughan, S. 2003, MNRAS, 340, L28

    2003

  15. [23]

    C., Vaughan, S., Nandra, K., et al

    Fabian, A. C., Vaughan, S., Nandra, K., et al. 2002, MNRAS, 335, L1

    2002

  16. [24]

    1997, PASJ, 49, 159

    Fanton, C., Calvani, M., de Felice, F., & Cadez, A. 1997, PASJ, 49, 159

    1997

  17. [25]

    Frank, J., King, A., & Raine, D. J. 2002, Accretion Power in Astrophysics: Third Edition (Cambridge University Press)

    2002

  18. [26]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.16562

    Gao, L., Shashank, S., & Bambi, C. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.16562

    2026 arXiv

  19. [27]

    2024, A&A Rev., 32, 3

    Genzel, R., Eisenhauer, F., & Gillessen, S. 2024, A&A Rev., 32, 3

    2024

  20. [28]

    George, I. M. & Fabian, A. C. 1991, MNRAS, 249, 352

    1991

  21. [29]

    G., Wilkins, D

    Gonzalez, A. G., Wilkins, D. R., & Gallo, L. C. 2017, MNRAS, 472, 1932

    2017

  22. [30]

    & Maraschi, L

    Haardt, F. & Maraschi, L. 1991, ApJ, 380, L51

    1991

  23. [31]

    K., Thorne, K

    Harrison, B. K., Thorne, K. S., Wakano, M., & Wheeler, J. A. 1965, Gravitation Theory and Gravitational Collapse (University of Chicago Press)

    1965

  24. [32]

    & Petrucci, P

    Henri, G. & Petrucci, P. O. 1997, A&A, 326, 87

    1997

  25. [33]

    C., Reynolds, C

    Iwasawa, K., Fabian, A. C., Reynolds, C. S., et al. 1996, MNRAS, 282, 1038

    1996

  26. [34]

    1949, Reviews of Modern Physics, 21, 531

    Klein, O. 1949, Reviews of Modern Physics, 21, 531

    1949

  27. [35]

    R., & Chavanis, P.-H

    Krut, A., Argüelles, C. R., & Chavanis, P.-H. 2026, Phys. Rev. D, 113, 023010

    2026

  28. [36]

    R., Chavanis, P.-H., Rueda, J

    Krut, A., Argüelles, C. R., Chavanis, P.-H., Rueda, J. A., & Ruffini, R. 2023, ApJ, 945, 1

    2023

  29. [37]

    C., Fabian, A

    Lee, J. C., Fabian, A. C., Reynolds, C. S., Iwasawa, K., & Brandt, W. N. 1998, MNRAS, 300, 583

    1998

  30. [38]

    Lindquist, R. W. 1966, Annals of Physics, 37, 487

    1966

  31. [39]

    2014, ApJ, 787, 83

    Marinucci, A., Matt, G., Miniutti, G., et al. 2014, ApJ, 787, 83

    2014

  32. [40]

    & Matt, G

    Martocchia, A. & Matt, G. 1996, MNRAS, 282, L53

    1996

  33. [41]

    C., & Ross, R

    Matt, G., Fabian, A. C., & Ross, R. R. 1996, MNRAS, 278, 1111

    1996

  34. [42]

    M., Gunn, K

    McHardy, I. M., Gunn, K. F., Uttley, P., & Goad, M. R. 2005, MNRAS, 359, 1469

    2005

  35. [43]

    F., Argüelles, C

    Mestre, M. F., Argüelles, C. R., Carpintero, D. D., Crespi, V ., & Krut, A. 2024, A&A, 689, A194

    2024

  36. [44]

    R., Vieyro, F

    Millauro, C., Argüelles, C. R., Vieyro, F. L., Crespi, V ., & Mestre, M. F. 2024, A&A, 685, A24

    2024

  37. [45]

    C., Anabuki, N., et al

    Miniutti, G., Fabian, A. C., Anabuki, N., et al. 2007, PASJ, 59, 315

    2007

  38. [46]

    A., Stewart, G

    Nandra, K., Pounds, K. A., Stewart, G. C., Fabian, A. C., & Rees, M. J. 1989, MNRAS, 236, 39P

    1989

  39. [47]

    Oppenheimer, J. R. & V olkoff, G. M. 1939, Physical Review, 55, 374

    1939

  40. [48]

    Patel, V ., Bhattacharya, S., Bhattacharyya, S., & Joshi, P. S. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.20282 Article number, page 11 A&A proofs:manuscript no. main

    2026

  41. [49]

    R., Vieyro, F

    Pelle, J., Argüelles, C. R., Vieyro, F. L., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 534, 1217

    2024

  42. [50]

    2022, MNRAS, 515, 1316

    Pelle, J., Reula, O., Carrasco, F., & Bederian, C. 2022, MNRAS, 515, 1316

    2022

  43. [51]

    J., Delvaille, J

    Pineda, F. J., Delvaille, J. P., Grindlay, J. E., & Schnopper, H. W. 1980, ApJ, 237, 414

    1980

  44. [52]

    Reynolds, C. S. & Begelman, M. C. 1997, ApJ, 488, 109

    1997

  45. [53]

    L., Pelle, J., & Pérez, D

    Rosa, J. L., Pelle, J., & Pérez, D. 2024, Phys. Rev. D, 110, 084068

    2024

  46. [54]

    R., & Rueda, J

    Ruffini, R., Argüelles, C. R., & Rueda, J. A. 2015, MNRAS, 451, 622

    2015

  47. [55]

    & Bonazzola, S

    Ruffini, R. & Bonazzola, S. 1969, Physical Review, 187, 1767

    1969

  48. [56]

    Schiffrin, J. S. & Wald, R. M. 2014, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 31, 035024

    2014

  49. [57]

    Shakura, N. I. & Sunyaev, R. A. 1973, A&A, 24, 337

    1973

  50. [58]

    Shapiro, S. L. & Teukolsky, S. A. 1983, Black holes, white dwarfs and neutron stars. The physics of compact objects (John Wiley and Sons)

    1983

  51. [59]

    1981, ApJ, 249, 254

    Sorkin, R. 1981, ApJ, 249, 254

    1981

  52. [60]

    Sunyaev, R. A. & Titarchuk, L. G. 1980, A&A, 86, 121

    1980

  53. [61]

    C., et al

    Tanaka, Y ., Nandra, K., Fabian, A. C., et al. 1995, Nature, 375, 659

    1995

  54. [62]

    Tolman, R. C. 1930, Physical Review, 35, 904

    1930

  55. [63]

    1972, Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity (New York: John Wiley and Sons)

    Weinberg, S. 1972, Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity (New York: John Wiley and Sons)

    1972

  56. [64]

    R., Brenneman, L

    Wilkins, D. R., Brenneman, L. W., Ogorzałek, A., et al. 2026, ApJ, 1003, 103

    2026

  57. [65]

    Wilkins, D. R. & Fabian, A. C. 2012, MNRAS, 424, 1284

    2012

  58. [66]

    S., Begelman, M

    Wilms, J., Reynolds, C. S., Begelman, M. C., et al. 2001, MNRAS, 328, L27

    2001

  59. [67]

    J., Lee, J

    Young, A. J., Lee, J. C., Fabian, A. C., et al. 2005, ApJ, 631, 733 Article number, page 12

    2005

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.