Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 74 references

Gamma-ray emission from particle illumination and shock-cloud interaction in the W51 Complex

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read W51's ultra-high-energy gamma rays come from an old proton population trapped in a dense molecular cloud, not from the current supernova shock.

desk verdict A useful direct-interaction analysis plus an interesting but overclaimed illumination fit; the illumination claim depends on a miswritten diffusion equation and an assumed D0. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.29488 v1 pith:UNXMVYJI submitted 2026-07-31 astro-ph.HE

Alan Sunny , Martina Cardillo This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords cosmicraysultra-high-energygammasupernovaremnantsmolecularcloudsilluminationscenariodiffusionsuppressionpiondecayW51complex
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to explain the ultra-high-energy (above 100 TeV) gamma-ray emission that LHAASO detects from the W51 complex, a massive star-forming region next to the middle-aged supernova remnant W51C. It argues that the standard explanation—the remnant's shock directly crushing nearby molecular clouds—can reproduce the Fermi-LAT and MAGIC data up to about ten TeV but fundamentally cannot reach 200 TeV. Instead, the paper claims, the UHE emission is the pion-decay glow of a proton population that was injected into the dense W51B molecular cloud for about 420 years some 18,000 years ago and has been efficiently confined there ever since. If that is right, dense molecular clouds are not just passive targets; they are long-term reservoirs that preserve evidence of past, possibly defunct, particle accelerators.

What carries the argument

The mechanism that carries the argument is the energy-dependent diffusion timescale t_D = R^2 / D(E), with D(E) = D0 (E/E0)^δ, evaluated for a 30-pc W51B cloud using D0 = 10^26 cm^2/s at E0 = 4 GeV and δ = 0.33 (Kolmogorov turbulence). This choice makes the escape time exceed 50,000 years over the relevant energy range, so a 420-year injection remains confined for the fitted 18,000-year age. The time-dependent transport equation is then solved (including pp losses, synchrotron, inverse Compton, and bremsstrahlung) to produce the predicted gamma-ray spectrum; the pion-decay component from the confined protons dominates the UHE band.

What would settle it

Measure the diffusion coefficient inside W51B—for example from cosmic-ray gradient or secondary-to-primary ratio mapping—or observe the >100 TeV emission with arcminute-scale resolution: if the UHE morphology follows the W51C shell rather than the cloud, or if the confinement time is found to be shorter than 18,000 years, the illumination scenario is ruled out.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a hadronic accelerator injecting particles into a dense environment, together with efficient confinement inside the cloud, naturally reproduces the observed UHE spectrum of W51 as measured by LHAASO through pion decay from proton-proton interactions. Concretely, the authors model the W51B giant molecular cloud as a roughly 30 pc, 10^5 solar-mass region with average density about 105 cm^-3 and magnetic field about 7 microgauss, and inject a power-law proton spectrum up to 400 TeV over 420 years. Evolving that population for 18,000 years with a strongly suppressed diffusion coefficient of 10^26 cm^2/s at 4 GeV (Kolmogorov energy dependence) keeps the protons inside th

Load-bearing premise

The whole result depends on the assumption that diffusion inside the W51B cloud is strongly suppressed (D0 = 10^26 cm^2/s), because with the typical interstellar diffusion coefficient the injected protons would escape in far less than 18,000 years and the UHE flux would not survive.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If correct, the >100 TeV photons from W51 do not require the current W51C shock to be a working PeVatron; the protons could have been accelerated during an early, more efficient phase of the remnant or by another source in the complex.
  • The direct shock-cloud interaction picture remains the explanation for the GeV emission, implying the W51C-B region contains two coexisting particle populations with different histories.
  • Dense molecular clouds would act as archives of past acceleration: old remnants embedded in such clouds could keep shining at ultra-high energies long after their shocks weaken, changing how UHE sources are interpreted.
  • The required total injected energy of about 10^49 erg is comfortably within the energy budget of a supernova, and the 18-kyr evolution age matches the estimated SNR age, making a young-SNR origin plausible but not required.
  • Since neither model produces the observed radio flux, the radio-emitting electrons must belong to a separate population, a prediction that can be checked by spatially resolved radio-gamma comparisons.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial extension: the confinement premise would apply to any dense cloud near a historical accelerator, so the same framework suggests searching for UHE gamma-ray halos around other middle-aged or old SNRs embedded in massive molecular clouds—objects that shock acceleration alone cannot explain.
  • Editorial extension: the 18-kyr coincidence with the SNR age may be a selection effect; within the illumination picture, any accelerator that injected particles into W51B within the last diffusion timescale would produce a similar spectrum, so the true source could be a star cluster or stellar wind.
  • Editorial extension: the model predicts a distinct morphology—compact GeV emission from the interaction zone and extended UHE emission tracing the cloud—which is testable by next-generation gamma-ray observatories; if high-resolution data place the UHE emission on the SNR shell instead of the cloud, the illumination scenario is wrong.
  • Editorial extension: a fully converged scan of injection duration, cloud density, magnetic field, and evolution age would show whether the 420-yr/18-kyr solution is unique; the paper's preliminary MCMC check is not sufficient to establish uniqueness.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper examines the gamma-ray emission from the W51 Complex in two hadronic frameworks. In the direct-interaction scenario, the SNR W51C shock interacting with the W51B molecular clouds is modeled with freshly accelerated particles, adiabatic compression, and reacceleration of Galactic cosmic rays. The authors find that this scenario can reproduce the Fermi-LAT and part of the MAGIC data but cannot reach the LHAASO UHE fluxes. In the proposed illumination scenario, a population of protons is injected into the W51B GMC, evolves for ~18 kyr under energy-dependent diffusion, and produces the observed >100 TeV emission through pion decay. The paper concludes that dense molecular clouds can confine historical CR populations and that this mechanism, rather than the current SNR shock, naturally explains the LHAASO UHE emission.

Significance. If the illumination result is robust, the paper would strengthen the emerging picture that middle-aged SNRs can appear as UHE gamma-ray sources through historical particle injection into dense molecular clouds, and it would identify the W51B GMC as a long-lived CR reservoir. The direct-interaction modeling is a useful contribution: it incorporates shock-cloud compression and Galactic CR reacceleration in a physically motivated way and gives a clear negative result for UHE production, consistent with theoretical expectations for a ~18 kyr SNR. The paper is also honest about its limitations, explicitly noting that propagation losses are not modeled and that the MCMC check is not fully converged. However, the illumination scenario is a parameterized fit to the LHAASO spectrum rather than a prediction, and its central confinement premise depends on an assumed, unmeasured diffusion coefficient. The internally inconsistent diffusion-time expression in Eq. (9) must be resolved before the numerical results can be accepted.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 3.2, Eq. (9); Appendix A] There is a sign error in the energy dependence of the diffusion time. From Eq. (7) t_D = R^2/D(E) and Eq. (8) D(E)=D0(E/E0)^delta with delta=0.33, one obtains t_D = 2.46e6 (E/E0)^(-delta) yr, not 2.46e6 (E/E0)^delta yr as printed. As printed, t_D grows with energy and gives t_D(400 TeV) ~ 1.1e8 yr, artificially trapping UHE protons. With the physically correct negative exponent, t_D(400 TeV) ~ 5.5e4 yr and t_D(100 TeV) ~ 9e4 yr. Appendix A's statement that escape begins only after ~50 kyr is consistent with the negative exponent, so Eq. (9) is likely a typographical error. However, the GAMERA calculation depends on which expression was actually implemented. The authors must correct Eq. (9), state explicitly which form the code uses, and re-evaluate Fig. 5 and the fitted parameters if the code used the printed positive exponent.
  2. [Sec. 3.2, Eq. (8)] The entire confinement argument rests on the assumed value D0=1e26 cm^2/s. This is cited to literature on dense regions, but it is not measured or independently constrained for W51B. The sensitivity is severe: with D0=1e27 cm^2/s, still a suppressed value, the correct-sign t_D(100 TeV) becomes ~9e3 yr, shorter than the adopted age of 18 kyr, so the UHE protons would escape before producing the observed flux. Please provide a sensitivity scan over D0 (and delta) or an observational constraint on the diffusion coefficient in W51B. Without this, the statement that the cloud 'efficiently confines' the particles is an assumption, not a result.
  3. [Sec. 4.2, Table 1; Appendix B] The UHE 'explanation' in the illumination scenario is a fit rather than a predictive model. The proton luminosity, spectral index, maximum energy, injection duration, and evolution age are all adjusted to match the LHAASO spectrum. The MCMC consistency check in Appendix B fixes the injection spectrum and luminosity, varies only t_inj, age, B_MC, and n_MC, and is explicitly not converged; it therefore does not independently validate the key injection parameters. The paper should reframe the illumination result as demonstrating that a parameterized injection model with suppressed diffusion can fit the data, and should quantify the acceptable parameter region, e.g. by reporting a chi-square or contour limits from the MCMC, rather than calling the match 'natural'.
  4. [Sec. 4.2, first paragraph after Table 1] The model starts with particles already injected at the GMC and explicitly neglects propagation and energy losses between any real accelerator and the cloud. The statement that the inferred injection history is 'compatible with a young SNR origin' is therefore not directly supported by the model. This caveat is stated in Sec. 4.2, but it is load-bearing for the conclusion that a historical accelerator in the W51 Complex is responsible for the UHE emission. Either add a simple estimate of transport losses (adiabatic, pp, and diffusive escape) over the distance from W51C to W51B, or explicitly restrict the conclusion to the statement that the GMC alone can confine such a population if injection occurred in situ.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Sec. 1] Typo: 'escpaed' should be 'escaped'.
  2. [Fig. 4 caption] Typo: 'per-existing' should be 'pre-existing'.
  3. [Sec. 4.1] The notation k_T=2/3 for the Kolmogorov perturbation spectrum is not defined. Clarify its relation to the diffusion index delta=1/3 used in the illumination scenario.
  4. [References] The reference 'Wu, H., Zha, M., Bing, Z., Cao, Z., & Aharion, F.' contains a typo: 'Aharion' should be 'Aharonian'.
  5. [Appendix B] Fig. B.1 shows 'Parameter Posteriors' but the text does not report the median or credible intervals. Please add the numerical ranges shown in the figure so the reader can compare them with the adopted best-fit values.
  6. [Sec. 3.2] Equation (9) uses E_{pr,el} without defining the subscript convention. Define it in the text, e.g. as the particle kinetic energy for protons/electrons respectively.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Illumination 'explanation' of the LHAASO UHE spectrum is a spectral fit to those same data, with confinement assumed via D0.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Sec. 4.2 (Table 1, Fig. 5); Sec. 5]
    ""The remaining parameters are constrained through spectral fitting, primarily guided by the UHE data. ... An important result is that reproducing the characteristic LHAASO spectrum, using the injected particle population listed in Table 1, requires a relatively large system age. ... We find that age≈18,000 years provides an optimal fit to the data.""

    The illumination model's injected luminosity, spectral index, Emax, injection duration (tinj≈420 yr) and evolution age (age≈18 kyr) are all varied to reproduce the same LHAASO UHE points that are then said to be 'naturally' explained. The resulting spectrum in Fig. 5 is therefore a fit, not an independent prediction: with these five free parameters plus an assumed diffusion coefficient chosen for confinement, the model can be tuned to pass through the measured spectrum by construction. The conclusion in Sec. 5 that 'a hadronic accelerator ... can naturally reproduce the observed UHE emission' reduces to this fitted parameterization; no independent data set or first-principles relation fixes the parameters, and the MCMC check is explicitly unconverged.

full rationale

Self-citations are not the problem: the direct shock-cloud calculation built on Cardillo et al. (2016) is used with fixed shock parameters and fails against the LHAASO UHE points, which is a genuine falsifiable result. The circularity is confined to the illumination branch. There, Sec. 4.2 states that the remaining parameters are constrained by spectral fitting guided by the UHE data, and Table 1 plus the text give the fitted injection luminosity (4.5×10^38 erg/s), spectral index (2.3), Emax (400 TeV), tinj (~420 yr) and age (~18 kyr) as the inputs that reproduce Fig. 5. Presenting that reproduction as 'naturally' explaining the observed UHE emission is a fitted-input-called-prediction: the model is normalized and shaped on the same data it claims to explain. The confinement premise is likewise inserted, not derived: D0=10^26 cm^2/s is adopted 'considering a better particle confinement,' guaranteeing tD>age at the fitted age; a typical ISM D0 would remove the UHE protons before they radiate. Separately, Eq. 9 appears to have a sign error relative to Eqs. 7-8 (Appendix A is consistent with the opposite sign), which is a correctness risk, not a circularity, but it means the numerical confinement result is not verifiable from the text. Appendix B's MCMC is explicitly not fully converged. Net effect: the central illumination claim is a parameterized fit, so partial circularity, score 6.

Assumptions & free parameters 13 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model rests on a fitted injection plus an assumed diffusion law; the cloud's role as a confining reservoir is partly an input rather than an emergent finding.

free parameters (13)
  • Alfvén parameter b (direct interaction) = 3
    Sets ambient B0 = 14 µG in the interaction zone via B0 = b sqrt(n0) µG; value 'constrained by the data' (Sec. 4.1).
  • Injection index α (direct interaction) = 4.4
    Power-law slope for freshly accelerated protons/electrons (Eq. 1); chosen to match the GeV-TeV SED (Sec. 4.1).
  • Interaction timescale t_int = 11,000 yr
    Duration of the SNR-MC interaction; varied for best fit (Sec. 4.1).
  • Turbulence correlation length L_c = 3×10^17 cm
    Adopted within the plausible 0.01-100 pc range to best fit (Sec. 4.1).
  • CR acceleration efficiency ξ_CR = 1.5e-3
    Fraction of shock energy into non-thermal particles; assumed small for a middle-aged SNR (Sec. 4.1).
  • Proton injection luminosity L_p (illumination) = 4.5e38 erg/s
    Injected proton luminosity into the GMC; fitted to reproduce the LHAASO flux (Sec. 4.2, Table 1).
  • Injection spectral index (illumination) = 2.3
    Index of the injected power-law; fitted (Sec. 4.2, Table 1).
  • Maximum injected proton energy = 400 TeV
    Sets the UHE tail; chosen to match LHAASO emission (Sec. 4.2, Table 1).
  • Injection duration t_inj = 420 yr
    Duration of the particle injection episode, fitted; interpreted as the early SNR phase (Sec. 4.2).
  • System age (evolution time) = 18,000 yr
    Time over which particles evolve in the cloud; fitted, and noted to coincide with the assumed SNR age (Sec. 4.2).
  • MC density n_MC = 105 cm^-3
    Adopted average GMC density, close to the observed ~120 cm^-3; affects pp emissivity (Sec. 4.2).
  • MC magnetic field B_MC = 7 µG
    Assumed from the Crutcher (2012) density-field relation; lower than LHAASO's 50 µG (Sec. 4.2).
  • Diffusion coefficient D0 = 10^26 cm^2/s
    Suppressed diffusion normalization at 4 GeV; crucial for confinement and adopted rather than measured (Eq. 8, Sec. 3.2).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Crushed-cloud compression formalism (Blandford & Cowie 1982; Cardillo et al. 2016)
    Used without re-derivation for particle spectral shift and emissivity enhancement (Eqs. 2-4; Sec. 3.1.1).
  • domain assumption Hadronic pion-decay γ-rays dominate the UHE emission
    Electron-to-proton ratio 0.01 and neglect of secondaries in illumination; pp interactions are assumed to be the main channel (Secs. 3.2, 4).
  • domain assumption Strongly suppressed diffusion (D0=10^26 cm^2/s, δ=0.33) inside the GMC
    Assumed so that t_D > age holds for the fitted age (Eqs. 7-9; Sec. 3.2); not directly measured for W51B.
  • domain assumption W51B approximated as a uniform cloud of size ~30 pc and constant density
    Spherical/uniform approximation from averaged mass and size (Sec. 3.2); ignores clumpiness and internal structure.
  • ad hoc to paper Injected spectrum is a single power law to 400 TeV with no propagation losses between accelerator and cloud
    Stated in Sec. 4.2 as a simplification; transport losses could alter the injected spectrum but are not modeled.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Gamma-ray emission from particle illumination and shock-cloud interaction in the W51 Complex." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UNXMVYJI

@misc{pith2026260729488,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Gamma-ray emission from particle illumination and shock-cloud interaction in the W51 Complex},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UNXMVYJI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.29488}
}
abstract

In the current era of very-high-energy (VHE) and ultra-high-energy (UHE) $\gamma$-ray astronomy, understanding Galactic PeVatrons and their acceleration mechanisms remains a primary objective. Recent LHAASO observations of the W51 Complex make it an ideal laboratory for investigating the origin of UHE emission, particularly due to the presence of massive and dense molecular environment surrounding multiple potential particle accelerators. In this work, we study two hadronic scenarios for the W51 Complex. First, we model the direct interaction between the SNR W51C and the nearby clouds in W51B, incorporating fresh particle acceleration, shock-driven adiabatic compression, and reacceleration of permeating Galactic cosmic rays. Second, we explore an accelerator-independent illumination scenario in which the W51B cloud acts as a long-term confinement region for high-energy particles injected during an earlier epoch. We find that the direct shock-cloud interaction scenario successfully reproduces the GeV emission observed by Fermi-LAT, but fails to account for the UHE emission detected by LHAASO. In contrast, the illumination scenario naturally explains the UHE spectrum, indicating that dense molecular clouds can efficiently confine and sustain energetic hadronic populations over long timescales. Although the inferred injection history is compatible with a young SNR origin, the source-independent nature of the illumination framework also permits other accelerators within the W51 Complex. Our results therefore identify dense molecular environments as the key structures sustaining historical PeVatron activity and shaping the observed UHE $\gamma$-ray emission.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.29488 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic of the two particle interaction scenarios considered for the W51 complex: direct interaction between the W51C [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Radio spectral energy distribution of the W51C-B region (left) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Multiwavelength spectral energy distribution of the W51 region considering initial contributions from Galactic CR reaccel [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Combined spectral energy distribution of the W51 SNR-MC interaction region. The total emission is modeled as the sum of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Total emission from the W51B GMC resulting from the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Neutral pion emission from accelerated protons in the supernova remnant

    Giuliani, A and others , journal=. Neutral pion emission from accelerated protons in the supernova remnant. 2011 , publisher=

    2011

  2. [2]

    Nature , volume=

    Ultrahigh-energy photons up to 1.4 petaelectronvolts from 12 -ray galactic sources , author=. Nature , volume=

  3. [3]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=

    Does or did the supernova remnant Cassiopeia A operate as a PeVatron? , author=. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  4. [4]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.10677 , year=

    What sources are the dominant Galactic cosmic-ray accelerators? , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.10677 , year=

    arXiv

  5. [5]

    The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review , volume=

    The origin of galactic cosmic rays , author=. The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  6. [6]

    Universe , volume=

    The hunt for pevatrons: The case of supernova remnants , author=. Universe , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  7. [7]

    Handbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics , pages=

    Nonthermal processes and particle acceleration in supernova remnants , author=. Handbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics , pages=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  8. [8]

    International Journal of Modern Physics D , volume=

    The origin of Galactic cosmic rays: challenges to the standard paradigm , author=. International Journal of Modern Physics D , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

Show all 74 references
  1. [9]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=

    LHAASO J2108+ 5157 as a molecular cloud illuminated by a supernova remnant , author=. Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  2. [10]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=

    Dissecting the emission from LHAASO J0341+ 5258: Implications for future multiwavelength observations , author=. Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  3. [11]

    Supernova remnant

    Cardillo, Martina and Amato, Elena and Blasi, Pasquale , journal=. Supernova remnant. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  4. [12]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=

    The supernova remnant W44: Confirmations and challenges for cosmic-ray acceleration , author=. Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  5. [13]

    Astrophysical Journal, Part 1, vol

    Radio emission from supernova remnants in a cloudy interstellar medium , author=. Astrophysical Journal, Part 1, vol. 260, Sept. 15, 1982, p. 625-634. Research supported by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation , volume=

    1982

  6. [14]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    Disentangling the radio emission of the supernova remnant W51C , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  7. [15]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=

    Molecular chemistry induced by a J-shock toward supernova remnant W51C , author=. Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  8. [16]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    Limits on compression of cosmic rays in supernova remnants , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  9. [17]

    Evidence for particle acceleration approaching PeV energies in the

    Cao, Zhen and others , journal=. Evidence for particle acceleration approaching PeV energies in the. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  10. [18]

    Koo, Bon-Chul and Kim, Kee-Tae and Seward, Frederick D , journal=

  11. [19]

    On the non-thermal emission from the supernova remnant

    Fang, Jun and Zhang, Li , journal=. On the non-thermal emission from the supernova remnant. 2010 , publisher=

    2010

  12. [20]

    HIGH-VELOCITY H i IS NOT ASSOCIATED WITH THE TeV SUPERNOVA REMNANT

    Tian, WW and Leahy, DA , journal=. HIGH-VELOCITY H i IS NOT ASSOCIATED WITH THE TeV SUPERNOVA REMNANT. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  13. [21]

    Cardillo, Martina and others , journal=. The. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  14. [22]

    Interaction between the W51C Supernova Remnant and a Molecular Cloud. I. HI 21 Centimeter Line Observations , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 1997 , publisher=

    1997

  15. [23]

    Revealing

    Jogler, T and Funk, S , journal=. Revealing. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  16. [24]

    Morphological and spectral properties of the

    Aleksi. Morphological and spectral properties of the. Astronomy & astrophysics , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

    2012

  17. [25]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=

    The HI/OH/Recombination line survey of the inner Milky Way (THOR)-Survey overview and data release 1 , author=. Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  18. [26]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=

    The HI/OH/Recombination line survey of the inner Milky Way (THOR): data release 2 and H I overview , author=. Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  19. [27]

    Applied Sciences , volume=

    The LHAASO PeVatron bright sky: What we learned , author=. Applied Sciences , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  20. [28]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.14867 , year=

    Studying SNR-MC interactions as galactic PeVatrons in the era of CTAO and ASTRI Mini-Array , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.14867 , year=

  21. [29]

    Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics , year=

    Investigating the Origin of Ultra-High-Energy -ray Sources fromSupernova Remnants Interacting with Molecular Clouds , author=. Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics , year=

  22. [30]

    Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan , volume=

    Massive star formation in W51 A triggered by cloud--cloud collisions , author=. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  23. [31]

    Journal of High Energy Astrophysics , volume=

    Exploring the supernova remnant contribution to the first LHAASO source catalog via passively illuminated interstellar clouds , author=. Journal of High Energy Astrophysics , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  24. [32]

    2012 , month =

    Inoue, Tsuyoshi and Inutsuka, Shu-ichiro , title =. 2012 , month =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/759/1/35 , url =

    2012 doi

  25. [33]

    Science , volume=

    Detection of the characteristic pion-decay signature in supernova remnants , author=. Science , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  26. [34]

    and Aharonian, F

    Gabici, S. and Aharonian, F. A. and Casanova, S. , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2009 , month =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14832.x , url =

    2009

  27. [35]

    On the emissivity of pi\^

    Aharonian, FA and Atoyan, AM , journal=. On the emissivity of pi\^

  28. [36]

    , keywords =

    Ultrahigh-energy -Rays from Past Explosions in Our Galaxy. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac4757 , archivePrefix =. 2112.08757 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  29. [37]

    , keywords =

    Dissecting the emission from LHAASO J0341+5258: Implications for future multiwavelength observations. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347258 , archivePrefix =. 2309.04729 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  30. [38]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=

    The dense gas mass fraction in the W51 cloud and its protoclusters , author=. Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  31. [39]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    OH (1720 MHz) masers: a multiwavelength study of the interaction between the W51C supernova remnant and the W51B star forming region , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  32. [40]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    Chandra observations of the W51C supernova remnant , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

  33. [41]

    1--0.1) , author=

    XMM-Newton observation of the Galactic supernova remnant W51C (G49. 1--0.1) , author=. Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  34. [42]

    39th International Cosmic Ray Conference , pages=

    Redefining the High-Energy gamma-ray morphology of the W51 complex with Fermi: detection of two extended components associated with W51B and W51C , author=. 39th International Cosmic Ray Conference , pages=

  35. [43]

    Astrophysics Source Code Library , pages=

    GAMERA: Source modeling in gamma astronomy , author=. Astrophysics Source Code Library , pages=

  36. [44]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    Diffuse galactic continuum gamma rays: a model compatible with EGRET data and cosmic-ray measurements , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2004 , publisher=

    2004

  37. [45]

    Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics , volume=

    Magnetic fields in molecular clouds , author=. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

    2012

  38. [46]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=

    Multiple accelerated particle populations in the Cygnus Loop with Fermi-LAT , author=. Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  39. [47]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=

    The hi/oh/recombination line survey of the inner milky way (thor)-survey overview and data release 1 , author=. Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  40. [48]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=

    A young supernova remnant illuminating nearby molecular clouds with cosmic rays , author=. Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  41. [49]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Li, Hui and Chen, Yang , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2012 , month =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20270.x , url =

    2012

  42. [50]

    31st International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC 2009) , year=

    Discovery of a VHE gamma-ray source in the W51 region , author=. 31st International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC 2009) , year=

    2009

  43. [51]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    Milagro observations of multi-TeV emission from Galactic sources in the Fermi bright source list , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  44. [52]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    3HWC: the third HAWC catalog of very-high-energy gamma-ray sources , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  45. [53]

    Brazilian Journal of Physics , volume=

    Very local interstellar spectra for galactic electrons, protons and helium , author=. Brazilian Journal of Physics , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  46. [54]

    Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific , volume=

    emcee: the MCMC hammer , author=. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  47. [55]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    Turbulent amplification of magnetic field and diffusive shock acceleration of cosmic rays , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2004 , publisher=

    2004

  48. [56]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=

    On the spectrum of high-energy cosmic rays produced by supernova remnants in the presence of strong cosmic-ray streaming instability and wave dissipation , author=. Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=. 2005 , publisher=

    2005

  49. [57]

    Universe , volume=

    Supernova Remnants in Gamma Rays , author=. Universe , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  50. [58]

    Handbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics , pages=

    The Cherenkov telescope array , author=. Handbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics , pages=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  51. [59]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.07737 , year=

    The southern wide-field Gamma-ray observatory (SWGO): A next-generation ground-based survey instrument for VHE Gamma-ray astronomy , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.07737 , year=

    1907 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Journal of High Energy Astrophysics , volume=

    The astri mini-array of cherenkov telescopes at the observatorio del teide , author=. Journal of High Energy Astrophysics , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  53. [61]

    Universe , volume=

    Science with the ASTRI Mini-Array: From Experiment to Open Observatory , author=. Universe , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  54. [62]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    Galactic cosmic rays in the local interstellar medium: Voyager 1 observations and model results , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  55. [63]

    Nature Astronomy , volume=

    Cosmic ray measurements from Voyager 2 as it crossed into interstellar space , author=. Nature Astronomy , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  56. [64]

    Astroparticle Physics , volume=

    On the cosmic ray spectrum from type II supernovae expanding in their red giant presupernova wind , author=. Astroparticle Physics , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  57. [65]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    Exploring particle escape in supernova remnants through gamma rays , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  58. [66]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    From cosmic ray source to the Galactic pool , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  59. [67]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1009.5291 , year=

    Constraints on the cosmic ray diffusion coefficient in the W28 region from gamma-ray observations , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1009.5291 , year=

    arXiv

  60. [68]

    Science , volume=

    Peta--electron volt gamma-ray emission from the Crab Nebula , author=. Science , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  61. [69]

    Observation of cosmic-ray acceleration and escape from SNR W44 by LHAASO

    Wu, Hanrong and Zha, Min and Bing, Zhang and Cao, Zhen and Aharion, Felix. Observation of cosmic-ray acceleration and escape from SNR W44 by LHAASO. Proceedings of 39th International Cosmic Ray Conference PoS(ICRC2025). doi:10.22323/1.501.0882

    doi

  62. [70]

    National Science Review , volume=

    Ultrahigh-energy gamma-ray emission associated with black hole--jet systems , author=. National Science Review , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  63. [71]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1203.3234 , year=

    Fermi-LAT Discovery of GeV Gamma-ray Emission from the Vicinity of SNR W44 , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1203.3234 , year=

    arXiv

  64. [72]

    Astronomy & astrophysics , volume=

    Cosmic-ray acceleration and escape from supernova remnant W44 as probed by Fermi-LAT and MAGIC , author=. Astronomy & astrophysics , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  65. [73]

    Interaction between the W51C Supernova Remnant and a Molecular Cloud. II. Discovery of Shocked CO and HCO+ , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

  66. [74]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    Fermi LAT discovery of extended gamma-ray emission in the direction of supernova remnant W51C , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.