Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 4 minor 46 references

Local Dispersive and Strichartz estimates for the Schr\"odinger equation associated to the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck operator

T0 review · 1 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper proves local weighted Strichartz estimates for the Schrödinger propagator of the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck operator and uses them to establish local well-posedness for the corresponding power-type nonlinear Schrödinger equation in…

desk verdict Solid weighted local Strichartz estimates for the OU propagator, but Theorem 3.3 overreaches its proof by a factor of two in the time interval; the applications survive a simple fix. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.03297 v1 pith:UOHNFVZX submitted 2025-07-04 math.FA

Aparajita Dasgupta , Uttam Kumar Dolai , Cheng Luo , Manli Song This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.FA MSC 35J1035B4542B35
keywords Ornstein-UhlenbeckoperatorStrichartzestimatesSchrödingerequationGaussianmeasuredispersiveMehlerkernellocalwell-posednessweightedLebesguespaces
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to build a local Strichartz theory for the Schrödinger equation driven by the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck operator $L=-\frac12\Delta+x\cdot\nabla$, the generator of the OU semigroup with Gaussian measure. Because $L$ is not translation-invariant, the propagator $e^{-itL}$ has no global dispersive decay; the paper shows that on the window $0<|t|\le\pi/2$ a weighted $L^1\to L^\infty$ decay estimate does hold, with weight $w(x)=e^{-|x|^2/2}$. From this single estimate, interpolation and the abstract $TT^*$ method yield weighted Strichartz estimates on $[-\pi/2,\pi/2]$ for every sharp $d/2$-admissible pair $(q,r)$. The payoff is local well-posedness for the power-type equation $i\partial_t u-Lu=\mu w^p|u|^{p-1}u$ in Gaussian $L^2$, both for $1

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the explicit Mehler kernel formula for the OU propagator, $M_{it}(x,y)=e^{-id\pi/4}e^{idt/2}(2\sin t)^{-d/2}e^{\frac12(|x|^2+|y|^2)}e^{\frac i2(\cot t(|x|^2+|y|^2)-\frac{2x\cdot y}{\sin t})}$. Its short-time decay, after multiplication by $w$, is the input to the abstract $TT^*$ lemma of Keel-Tao, which converts time decay into space-time integrability. The real interpolation theorem of Bergh-Löfström then identifies the intermediate spaces $(L^2_{\gamma_d},L^1_{\gamma_d}(w^{-1}))_{\theta,h}$ as $L^{2/(1+\theta)}_{\gamma_d}(w^{-2\theta/(1+\theta)})$, i.e. the family $L^r_{\gamma_d}(w^{r-2})$ used in the Strichartz norms.

What would settle it

A direct check of the kernel formula (2.1) at $t=\pi$ gives the factor $(\sin t)^{-d/2}=\infty$, so the pointwise bound (3.6) cannot hold at that time difference. One could exhibit $f\in L^1_{\gamma_d}(w^{-1})$ for which $\|e^{-i\pi L}f\|_{L^\infty_{\gamma_d}(w)}=\infty$, or check whether the weighted Strichartz bound (3.7) fails on the stated full interval; either would refute Theorem 3.3 as written.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the OU propagator, which has no global dispersive decay, nonetheless obeys a local weighted $L^1\to L^\infty$ estimate on $0<|t|\le\pi/2$: with $w(x)=e^{-|x|^2/2}$, the bound $\|e^{-itL}f\|_{L^\infty_{\gamma_d}(w)}\le |t|^{-d/2}\|f\|_{L^1_{\gamma_d}(w^{-1})}$ holds. This is read directly from the Mehler kernel formula (2.1), where the weight cancels the $e^{\frac12(|x|^2+|y|^2)}$ factor. Feeding this decay into the abstract $TT^*$ lemma and interpolating between $L^2_{\gamma_d}$ and $L^1_{\gamma_d}(w^{-1})$ gives, for every sharp $d/2$-admissible pair, the homogeneous and inhomogeneous weighted Strichartz estimates (3.7)-(3.8) on $[-\pi/2,\pi/2]$, with spatial norm $L^r_{\gamma_d}(w^{r-2})$.

Load-bearing premise

The proof needs the dispersive decay bound to hold for every pair of distinct times in the interval $[-\pi/2,\pi/2]$, including pairs separated by exactly $\pi$; the paper verifies the bound only for $0<|t|\le\pi/2$, and the kernel formula is singular at $t=\pi$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The OU Schrödinger propagator satisfies the homogeneous and inhomogeneous weighted Strichartz estimates (3.7)-(3.8) on $[-\pi/2,\pi/2]$ for every sharp $d/2$-admissible pair, including the endpoint case $d=1$, $(q,r)=(4,\infty)$.
  • The nonlinear equation $i\partial_t u-Lu=\mu w^p|u|^{p-1}u$ is locally well-posed in $L^2_{\gamma_d}$ for $1<p<1+4/d$, with existence time depending only on the size of the initial datum and a Lipschitz solution map.
  • At the critical exponent $p=1+4/d$, the equation is locally well-posed in the critical sense: for any $u_1$ in an $L^2_{\gamma_d}$ ball there is an interval on which the linear evolution of $u_1$ is small, and every datum sufficiently close to $u_1$ yields a unique solution.
  • The space $S(I\times\mathbb{R}^d)$ with norm the supremum over admissible pairs of $\|f\|_{L^q_t L^r_{\gamma_d}(w^{r-2})}$ is the natural solution space: it controls the linear evolution, the Duhamel term, and the nonlinearity in the contraction argument.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The mechanism should transfer to any time window avoiding the singularities at integer multiples of $\pi$, so the local theory is not tied to the specific interval $[-\pi/2,\pi/2]$.
  • The same weight-cancellation idea suggests a one-parameter family of weights $e^{-\beta|x|^2/2}$; changing $\beta$ would trade the strength of time decay against spatial integrability, and the admissible exponent range would shift accordingly.
  • The combination of an explicit kernel, a cancelling weight, and an abstract $TT^*$ lemma should apply to other non-translation-invariant Schrödinger evolutions with Mehler-type kernels, as long as the time interval avoids the kernel's singularities.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a local dispersive and Strichartz theory for the Schrödinger propagator e^{-itL} associated with the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck operator L = -Δ/2 + x·∇ on R^d with Gaussian measure. Section 2 records the Mehler kernel and the periodicity identity; Section 3 derives the local weighted L^1-to-L^∞ dispersive estimate (3.6) and then claims weighted Strichartz estimates, both homogeneous and inhomogeneous, on the interval [-π/2, π/2] via an abstract TT* lemma and real interpolation (Theorem 3.3). Section 4 applies these estimates to prove local well-posedness for the NLS with power nonlinearity in the subcritical case 1 < p < 1+4/d and in the critical case p = 1+4/d, working in Gaussian L^2 spaces with the weight w(x)=e^{-|x|^2/2}.

Significance. The explicit Mehler-kernel computation is a clear strength: the dispersive decay bound has no fitted constants, the Strichartz exponents are exactly the sharp d/2-admissible ones, and the well-posedness applications are concrete and directly tied to the estimates. The main claim, if corrected as described below, would give a useful and fairly general local Strichartz framework for the OU operator, a setting where global decay genuinely fails. The flaw I identify is localized to the statement of Theorem 3.3 and is repairable without changing the applications in Section 4.

major comments (1)
  1. The decay hypothesis of Lemma 3.4 is not verified for the interval I=[-π/2, π/2] used in Theorem 3.3. Equation (3.6) proves ∥e^{-itL}u0∥_{L∞γ(w)} ≲ |t|^{-d/2} ∥u0∥_{L1γ(w^{-1})} only for 0<|t|≤π/2. On I, however, |t-s| ranges up to π (take t=π/2, s=-π/2), and for time differences with π/2<|t-s|≤π the factor |sin(t-s)| decreases to zero, so (3.6) does not control those differences. At the endpoint t-s=π, identity (2.2) gives e^{-iπL}f(x)=f(-x), and this reflection operator is not bounded from L^1γ(w^{-1}) to L∞γ(w): for f=χ_{B(x0,ε)}, ∥f∥_{L1γ(w^{-1})} ≈ |Bε| e^{-|x0|^2/2} while ∥e^{-iπL}f∥_{L∞γ(w)} = e^{-|x0|^2/2}, so the ratio diverges as ε→0. Thus Lemma 3.4 cannot be applied and Theorem 3.3 is not proved as stated. The necessary correction is to state the theorem for time intervals of length at most π/2, so that every difference |t-s| is at most π/2; the applications in Section 4 only use small intervals (Theorem 4.3 chooses T sufficiently small, and Theorem 4.4 and Lemma 4.5 choose I(η) sufficiently small), so the applications remain valid after this change. The statements in Sections 2 and 4 that refer freely to [-π/2, π/2] should be updated accordingly.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Title] The manuscript title contains a typo: 'STRICHAR TZ' should be 'STRICHARTZ'.
  2. [Lemma 3.4] The statement of Lemma 3.4 is imprecise: the energy estimate reads 'for all we have' and the notation mixes B0 and Bθ; please rewrite it with explicit domains, codomains, and the interpolation spaces in (3.9)-(3.10).
  3. [§2, periodicity remark] The sentence after (2.2) correctly notes that the L^pγ(w) norm of e^{-itL}f is π-periodic for even w, but this periodicity does not by itself justify applying TT* on [-π/2, π/2]; after the interval correction, the admissible time interval should be defined explicitly and used consistently in all subsequent statements.
  4. [References] The reference list contains several typos and incomplete entries, including 'Schr¨ odinger equaiton' in [13], 'Spring-Verlag' in [9], and [36] given only by a HAL identifier; these should be corrected.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Strichartz estimates are derived from the explicit Mehler kernel via external TT* and interpolation theorems; self-citations are contextual only.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is self-contained and non-circular. The dispersive bound (3.6) is obtained directly from the Mehler kernel formula (2.1) by the pointwise estimate |e^{-itL}u_0| w ≤ |sin t|^{-d/2} ∫ |u_0| w^{-1} dγ, with no fitted constants and no target estimate assumed. Theorem 3.3 then applies the abstract Keel-Tao lemma (Lemma 3.4) together with standard real-interpolation identifications from Bergh-Löfström, so the weighted Strichartz inequalities genuinely follow from the kernel decay and external, parameter-free theorems. Section 4 uses Theorem 3.3 as input: the Duhamel and nonlinearity estimates are consequences of the already-proved Strichartz inequalities and Hölder-type inequalities. The nonlinearity N(u)=µw^p|u|^{p-1}u is chosen so that N(u)=µ|uw|^{p-1}(uw); this is an explicit model choice in (4.1), not a hidden equivalence between the theorem's hypothesis and conclusion. Self-citations ([19]-[21], [31]-[32], [38]-[40]) appear only in the introduction as literature context and do not support any step of the dispersive, Strichartz, or well-posedness arguments, so they are not load-bearing. One non-circular gap should be flagged: the proof of Theorem 3.3 verifies the decay hypothesis of Lemma 3.4 only for 0<|t-s|≤π/2, but on the stated interval [-π/2,π/2] the difference can reach π, where e^{-iπL} is reflection and the L^1_γ(w^{-1})→L^∞_γ(w) norm is infinite. This is a correctness/exposition issue in the theorem statement, not a circularity; the applications are repairable by taking subintervals of length at most π/2.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central proof rests on standard spectral theory, the Mehler kernel, interpolation, and TT* machinery. The weight w is introduced by hand, and the unproved extension of the decay estimate to time differences up to pi is a load-bearing ad hoc assumption.

free parameters (1)
  • Gaussian weight w(x)=e^{-|x|^2/2} = w(x)=e^{-|x|^2/2}
    Chosen by hand to balance the Gaussian factors in the Mehler kernel; it defines all the weighted norms and the nonlinearity w^p. It is not fitted to data, but it is a modeling choice that the Strichartz estimates depend on.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Mehler formula for the OU semigroup kernel, including the limit to the Schrödinger kernel (2.1)
    Section 2; standard result in Gaussian harmonic analysis.
  • standard math Bergh-Löfström real interpolation theorem for weighted Lp spaces (Theorems 3.4.1 and 5.5.1)
    Used in the proof of Theorem 3.3 to identify interpolated spaces and their duals.
  • standard math Keel-Tao abstract TT* lemma (Lemma 3.4)
    Used to convert the dispersive estimate into Strichartz estimates.
  • domain assumption U(t)=e^{-itL} is unitary on L2_gamma and the kernel periodicity (2.2) holds
    Needed for the energy estimate and for reducing norms to the interval [-pi/2, pi/2].
  • ad hoc to paper The decay estimate (3.6) extends to all time differences in the interval [-pi/2, pi/2]
    Not proven; the paper states Theorem 3.3 on the full interval while (3.6) is proved only for 0 < |t| <= pi/2.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Local Dispersive and Strichartz estimates for the Schr\"odinger equation associated to the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck operator." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UOHNFVZX

@misc{pith2026250703297,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Local Dispersive and Strichartz estimates for the Schr\"odinger equation associated to the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck operator},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UOHNFVZX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.03297}
}
abstract

In this paper we study the linear and nonlinear Schr\"odinger equations associated with the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck (OU) operator endowed with the Gaussian measure. While classical Strichartz estimates are well-developed for the free Schr\"odinger operator on Euclidean spaces, extending them to non-translation-invariant operators like the OU operator presents significant challenges due to the lack of global dispersive decay. In this work, we overcome these difficulties by deriving localized $L^1 \to L^\infty$ dispersive estimates for the OU Schr\"odinger propagator using Mehler kernel techniques. We then establish a family of weighted Strichartz estimates in Gaussian $L^p$ spaces via interpolation and the abstract $TT^*$-method. As an application, we prove local well-posedness results for the nonlinear Schr\"odinger equation with power-type nonlinearity in both subcritical and critical regimes. Our framework reveals new dispersive phenomena in the context of the OU semigroup and provides the first comprehensive Strichartz theory in this setting.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J. -P. Anker, V. Pierfelice, Nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation on real hyperbolic spaces, Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e (C) Non Linear Anal.26(5), 1853-1869 (2009). 2

    work page 2009

  2. [2]

    J. -P. Anker, V. Pierfelice, Wave and Klein-Gordon equations on hyperbolic spaces , Anal. PDE 7, 953-995 (2014). 2

    work page 2014

  3. [3]

    J. -P. Anker, V. Pierfelice, M. Vallarino, The wave equation on hyperbolic spaces , J. Differ. Equ. 252(10), 5613-5661 (2012). 2

    work page 2012

  4. [4]

    Arpad and G

    B. Arpad and G. Karlheinz and O. Kasso and R. Luke, Unimodular Fourier multipliers for modulation spaces, J. Funct. Anal., 246(2): 366-384, 2007. 10

    work page 2007

  5. [5]

    Bahouri, D

    H. Bahouri, D. Barilari, I. Gallagher, Strichartz estimates and Fourier restriction theorems on the Heisenberg group , J. Fourier Anal. Appl. 27(2) (2021). 2

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    Bahouri, P

    H. Bahouri, P. G´ erard, C. J. Xu,Espaces de Besov et estimations de Strichartz g´ en´ eralis´ ees sur le groupe de Heisenberg , J. Anal. Math. 82, 93-118 (2000). 2

    work page 2000

  7. [7]

    Bahouri, C

    H. Bahouri, C. F. Kammerer, I. Gallagher, Dispersive estimates for the Schr¨ odinger operator on step 2 stratified Lie groups , Anal. PDE 9, 545-574 (2016). 2

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    Banica, Remarks on the blow-up for Schr¨ odinger equations with critical mass on a plane domain, Ann

    V. Banica, Remarks on the blow-up for Schr¨ odinger equations with critical mass on a plane domain, Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. (5) , 29(3):491–510, 2000. 3

    work page 2000

Show all 46 references
  1. [9]

    Bergh, J

    J. Bergh, J. L¨ ofstr¨ om,Interpolation Spaces, An Introduction , Spring-Verlag, New York,

  2. [10]

    Bourgain, Fourier transform restriction phenomena for certain lattice subsets and appli- cation to nonlinear evolution equations I , Geom

    J. Bourgain, Fourier transform restriction phenomena for certain lattice subsets and appli- cation to nonlinear evolution equations I , Geom. Funct. Anal. 3, 107-156 (1993). 2

    1993

  3. [11]

    T. A. Bui, P. D’Ancona, X. T. Duong, D. M¨ uller, On the flows associated to self-adjoint operators on metric measure spaces , Math. Ann. 375, 1393-1426 (2019). 2

    2019

  4. [12]

    N. Burq, P. G´ erard, and N. Tzvetkov,Strichartz inequalities and the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation on compact manifolds , Amer. J. Math. , 126(3):569–605, 2004. 2, 3

    2004

  5. [13]

    Chaichenets, Modulation spaces and nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equaiton

    L. Chaichenets, Modulation spaces and nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equaiton. Phd thesis, KIT- Bibliothek, 2018. 11

    2018

  6. [14]

    Cordero and F

    E. Cordero and F. Nicola, Metaplectic representation on Wiener a spaces and applications to the Schr¨ odinger equation, J. Funct. Anal., 506-534, 2008. 10

    2008

  7. [15]

    Cordero and F

    E. Cordero and F. Nicola, Some new Strichartz estimate for the Schrodinger equation , J. Differential Equation, 245, 1945-1974, 2008. 10

    1945

  8. [16]

    Cordero and D

    E. Cordero and D. Zucco, Strichartz Estimate for Schr¨ odinger Equation, CUBO A Mathe- matical Journal, vol. 12, 213-239, 2010. 10

    2010

  9. [17]

    D’Ancona, V

    P. D’Ancona, V. Pierfelice and N. Visciglia, Some remarks on the Schr¨ odinger equation with a potential in Lr t Ls x, Math. Ann., 333(2), 271-290, 2005. 10

    2005

  10. [18]

    D’Ancona, V

    P. D’Ancona, V. Pierfelice, and F. Ricci, On the wave equation associated to the Hermite and the twisted Laplacian , J. Fourier Anal. Appl. 16(2), 294-310 (2010). 2

    2010

  11. [19]

    G. Feng, S. S. Mondal, M. Song and H. Wu, Orthonormal Strichartz inequalities and their applications on abstract measure spaces , arXiv: 2409.14044 (2024). 2 18 APARAJITA DASGUPTA, UTTAM KUMAR DOLAI, CHENG LUO, AND MANLI SONG

    2024 arXiv

  12. [20]

    G. Feng, M. Song, Restriction theorems and Strichartz inequalities for the Laguerre operator involving orthonormal functions , J. Geom. Anal. 34(9), Paper No. 287, 19 pp (2024). 2

    2024

  13. [21]

    G. Feng, M. Song and H. Wu, Decay estimates for a class of semigroups related to self- adjoint operators on metric measure spaces , J. Geom. Anal. 35(7), Paper No. 192 (2025). 2

    2025

  14. [22]

    Furioli, C

    G. Furioli, C. Melzi and A. Veneruso, Strichartz inequalities for the wave equation with the full Laplacian on the Heisenberg group , Canad. J. Math. 59(6), 1301-1322 (2007). 2

    2007

  15. [23]

    Furioli and A

    G. Furioli and A. Veneruso, Strichartz inequalities for the Schr¨ odinger equation with the full Laplacian on the Heisenberg group , Studia Math. 160, 157-178 (2004). 2

    2004

  16. [24]

    Ginibre and G

    J. Ginibre and G. Velo, Smoothing properties and retarded estimates for some dispersive evolution equations, Comm. Math. Phys. , 144(1):163–188, 1992. 2, 6

    1992

  17. [25]

    M. D. Hierro, Dispersive and Strichartz estimates on H-type groups , Studia Math. 169, 1-20 (2005). 2

    2005

  18. [26]

    A. D. Ionescu and G. Staffilani, Semilinear Schr¨ odinger flows on hyperbolic spaces: scatter- ing in H 1, Math. Ann., 345(1):133–158, 2009. 3

    2009

  19. [27]

    Ivanovici, G

    O. Ivanovici, G. Lebeau, F. Planchon, Dispersion for the wave equation inside strictly convex domains I: the Friedlander model case , Ann. Math. 180, 323-380 (2014). 2

    2014

  20. [28]

    Keel and T

    M. Keel and T. Tao, Endpoints Strichartz estimates , Amer. J. Math. 120, 955-980 (1998). 2, 3, 7, 8

    1998

  21. [29]

    Kenig and F

    C. Kenig and F. Merle, Global well-posedness, scattering and blow-up for the energy-critical focusing NLS, Invent. Math. , 166(3):645–675, 2006. 3

    2006

  22. [30]

    Liu and M

    H. Liu and M. Song, Strichartz inequalities for the wave equation with the full Laplacian on H-type groups, Abstr. Appl. Anal., Art. ID 219375, 10 pp (2014). 2

    2014

  23. [31]

    C. Luo, S. S. Mondal, M. Song, Decay estimates for a class of Dunkl wave equations , 2024, arXiv:2407.06949 2

    2024 arXiv

  24. [32]

    S. S. Mondal and M. Song, Orthonormal Strichartz inequalities for the (k, a)-generalized La- guerre operator and Dunkl operator , Israel J. Math., 2025, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11856- 025-2762-x 2

    2025 doi

  25. [33]

    A. K. Nandakumaran, and P. K. Ratnakumar, Schr¨ odinger equation and the oscillatory semigroup for the Hermite operator , J. Funct. Anal. 224(2), 371-385 (2005). 2

    2005

  26. [34]

    P. K. Ratnakumar, On Schr¨ odinger Propagator for the Special Hermite Operator, J. Fourier Anal. Appl. 14(2), 286-300 (2008). 2

    2008

  27. [35]

    Reed and B

    M. Reed and B. Simon, Methods of modern mathematical physics II: Fourier analysis , Academic New York, 1975. 2

    1975

  28. [36]

    Ben Sa ¨ ıd, A

    S. Ben Sa ¨ ıd, A. K. Nandakumaran, and P. K. Ratnakumar,Schr¨ odinger propagator and the Dunkl Laplacian, hal-00578446v1, (2011). 2

    2011

  29. [37]

    Song, Decay estimates for fractional wave equations on H-type groups , J

    M. Song, Decay estimates for fractional wave equations on H-type groups , J. Inequal. Appl. 2016(246), 12pp (2016). 2

    2016

  30. [38]

    M. Song, J. Tan, Decay estimates and Strichartz inequalities for a class of dispersive equa- tions on H-type groups , 2024, arXiv:2407.06899 2 STRICHARTZ ESTIMATES FOR THE SCHR ¨ODINGER EQUATION ASSOCIATED TO OU OPERATOR 19

    2024 arXiv

  31. [39]

    M. Song, J. Yang, Decay estimates for a class of wave equations on the Heisenberg group , Ann. Mat. Pur. Appl. 202(6), 2665–2685 (2023). 2

    2023

  32. [40]

    N. Song, J. Zhao, Strichartz estimates on the quaternion Heisenberg group , Bull. Sci. Math. 138(2), 293-315 (2014). 2

    2014

  33. [41]

    R. S. Strichartz, Restriction of Fourier transform to quadratic surfaces and decay of solu- tions of wave equations , Duke Math.J., 44, 705-774, 1977. 2, 6

    1977

  34. [42]

    T.Tao, Nonlinear Dispersive Equations: Local and Global Analysis , CBMS Regional Con- ference Series in Mathematics, Amer. Math. Soc., 2006. 10

    2006

  35. [43]

    Thangavelu, Lectures on Hermite and Laguerre Expansions , Princeton University Press,

    S. Thangavelu, Lectures on Hermite and Laguerre Expansions , Princeton University Press,

  36. [44]

    10, Amer

    Thierry Cazenave, Semilinear Schr¨ odinger equations, vol. 10, Amer. Math. Soc., 2003. 2

    2003

  37. [45]

    Urbina-Romero, Gaussian Harmonic Analysis , Springer Monographs in Mathematics,

    W. Urbina-Romero, Gaussian Harmonic Analysis , Springer Monographs in Mathematics,

  38. [46]

    Wang and H

    B. Wang and H. Hudzik, The global Cauchy problem for the NLS and NLKG with small rough data, J. Differential Equations, 232,36-73, 2007. 10 Department of Mathematics Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, Hauz Khas New Delhi-110016 India Email address : adasgupta@maths.iitd.ac...

    2007

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.