There are no 76 equiangular lines in R¹⁹
classification
🧮 math.MG
keywords
equiangularlinestherecitemathbbgraphproveregular
read the original abstract
Maximum size of equiangular lines in $\mathbb{R}^{19}$ has been known in the range between 72 to 76 since 1973. Acoording to the nonexistence of strongly regular graph $(75,32,10,16)$ \cite{aza15}, Larmen-Rogers-Seidel Theorem \cite{lar77} and Lemmen-Seidel bounds on equiangular lines with common angle $\frac 1 3$ \cite{lem73}, we can prove that there are no 76 equiangular lines in $\mathbb{R}^{19}$. As a corollary, there is no strongly regular graph $(76,35,18,14)$. Similar discussion can prove that there are no 96 equiangular lines in $\mathbb{R}^{20}$.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.