Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 57 references

The effectively optically thin accretion flow and its implication in supermassive black holes

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read An accretion flow long dismissed as unstable is shown to be thermally stable and sits between thin and slim discs at Eddington rates.

desk verdict Revives a neglected accretion solution with a testable spectral signature, but the stability proof and the unpublished companion paper are the load-bearing uncertainties. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.22904 v1 pith:UTZYRQES submitted 2025-06-28 astro-ph.HE

Mingjun Liu , B. F. Liu , Yilong Wang , Huaqing Cheng , Weimin Yuan This is my paper
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords accretiondiscseffectivelyopticallythinflowstandarddiscslimactivegalacticnucleisoftX-rayexcessComptonizationmulti-colorWienspectrum
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper revives a long-neglected accretion solution, the effectively optically thin accretion flow, and argues it is not a curiosity but a necessary middle state between the standard thin disc and the slim disc. The flow appears when radiation pressure makes the inner disc density drop, so the effective optical depth falls below unity, and the gas heats up until Compton scattering balances viscous heating. The authors show the flow is thermally stable, so it should exist in real systems, and that it produces a high-frequency multi-color Wien spectrum layered on the disc's blackbody. That extra component offers a physical origin for the soft X-ray excess in active galactic nuclei and constrains the viscosity parameter to $\alpha \sim 0.03$.

What carries the argument

The central object is the effectively optically thin accretion flow: a radiation-pressure-supported solution with effective optical depth $\tau_{\rm eff} < 1$ but Thomson scattering depth still large, so photons are trapped and Comptonized rather than freely escaping. The argument is carried by the generalized accretion equations developed in the companion Paper I, which unify the ADAF, SLE, thin-disc, and slim-disc branches; on top of these the paper adds improved treatments of the self-absorption edge for Compton seed photons and the scattering probability. The spectral calculation separates uncompressed radiative transfer from saturated Comptonization, producing a Bose-Einstein (Wien) component $W_\nu$ superimposed on the outer disc's multicolor blackbody. Stability is assessed by perturbing the vertically integrated equations: a positive slope of $Q^-/(1-f)Q^+$ with temperature gives thermal stability, while the derived torque--surface-density relation $T_{r\phi,1}/\Sigma_1 > 0$ gives viscous instability.

What would settle it

Measure the soft X-ray excess peak energy in a sample of luminous AGNs with Eddington ratios around 0.1--10 and known black hole masses; the model for $\alpha \sim 0.03$ predicts a Wien bump peaking near 0.1 keV that does not move with accretion rate, while competing warm-corona or blurred-reflection models predict peaks tied to coronal temperature or ionization state. If the observed excess peak shifts systematically with Eddington ratio or black hole mass, the effectively optically thin region is not present as described.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that an effectively optically thin accretion flow exists for accretion rates around 0.1 to 10 times the Eddington rate in supermassive black holes, connecting the radiation-pressure-dominated standard thin disc at lower rates to the slim disc at higher rates. In this flow the effective optical depth is less than one while the scattering optical depth remains large; the inner region is heated to roughly $10^7$ K (or higher for larger $\alpha$) and cools by quasi-saturated Comptonization. The paper demonstrates that the flow is thermally stable yet viscously unstable, contradicting earlier speculation that it could not survive, and that its spectrum is a multi-color Wien bump at a few keV to hundreds of keV depending on the viscosity parameter. For $\alpha \sim 0.03$, the Wien component peaks near 0.1 keV and is nearly independent of accretion rate, which the authors identify as an alternative origin for the soft X-ray excess in AGNs.

Load-bearing premise

The entire analysis rests on the generalized accretion equations taken from the companion Paper I (Liu et al. 2025), which are assumed to unify all accretion regimes; if those equations miss physics specific to the effectively optically thin regime, the existence and properties of the new solution would change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At accretion rates around the Eddington value, the inner region of a supermassive black hole's disc should naturally pass through an effectively optically thin phase before entering the slim-disc regime.
  • The emergent spectrum has two components: a multicolor blackbody from the outer thin disc and a multicolor Wien bump from the inner effectively optically thin region, with the Wien peak position and luminosity set by $\alpha$ and accretion rate.
  • For $\alpha \sim 0.03$, the Wien component sits near 0.1 keV and is nearly accretion-rate independent, giving an alternative, physically structured explanation for the soft X-ray excess and the 'warm corona' component needed in AGN spectral fits.
  • For larger viscosity ($\alpha \sim 0.1$--$0.3$), the effectively optically thin region can dominate the X-ray luminosity, offering a possible solution to the puzzle of why coronae in radio-quiet AGNs are so luminous.
  • The flow bridges the SSD and slim disc in the $\dot{M}$--$\Sigma$ plane, and for very large $\alpha \approx 0.9$ the optically thin ADAF connects directly to the effectively optically thin flow, creating a continuous path from ADAF to slim disc.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: if the effectively optically thin region is confirmed, it gives a concrete geometric location for the 'warm corona' invoked in AGN spectral fits: it is not a separate hot layer but the innermost part of the accretion flow itself, and its temperature should track the viscosity rather than the black hole mass.
  • Editorial inference: the viscous instability of the flow suggests duty-cycle or limit-cycle behavior. The flow may not be steady; it could oscillate between the effectively optically thin state and the thin/slim disc, producing variability timescales that could be tested against AGN light curves.
  • Editorial inference: the model predicts a specific scaling for the soft X-ray excess peak energy with black hole mass and accretion rate (roughly constant near 0.1 keV for $\alpha \sim 0.03$). This is testable with a sample of luminous AGNs with known masses and Eddington ratios.
  • Editorial inference: the same effectively optically thin state might appear in tidal disruption events and ultraluminous X-ray sources, where near-Eddington accretion is common; the predicted Wien bump could be searched for in their soft X-ray spectra.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper revisits a long-neglected accretion solution, the effectively optically thin accretion flow, within a generalized set of accretion equations introduced in a companion paper (Liu et al. 2025, Paper I). It claims that at accretion rates around the Eddington rate, radiation-pressure-dominated discs develop an inner region with effective optical depth below unity but large scattering optical depth, producing a multi-color Wien spectrum in addition to the outer multicolor blackbody. The authors further claim that this solution is thermally stable and viscously unstable, that it bridges the standard thin disc and the slim disc, and that comparing model spectra with average AGN spectra constrains the viscosity parameter to alpha ~ 0.03, potentially explaining the soft X-ray excess in AGNs. The paper contains parameter-space maps, radial structure plots, spectra for different masses and viscosities, and a schematic geometry.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the paper would provide a physically motivated connection between the thin-disc and slim-disc regimes, a new explanation candidate for the soft X-ray excess and warm corona in AGNs, and an independent route to constraining the viscosity parameter. The paper is strongest where it uses the unified equations from Paper I to map the location of the new solution in the accretion-rate/radius plane (Figures 4 and 5) and where it lays out testable spectral predictions for different alpha values (Figure 6). It is weaker where the stability proof relies on equilibrium-sequence scalings and where the single-zone, approximate Comptonization treatment is used to draw a quantitative constraint on alpha. The code and data are not publicly released, only available on reasonable request, so the numerical results are not independently reproducible from the manuscript alone.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.4, Eqs. (21)-(23) and Figure 7] The thermal-stability proof is not convincing as written. Eq. (22) gives T proportional to alpha^4 dot{m}^{-4}, and Eqs. (21) imply Sigma proportional to dot{m} at fixed radius, so T is derived along the equilibrium sequence. The stability criterion (23), however, requires partial derivatives of Q+ and Q- with respect to temperature at fixed surface density and fixed radius. Substituting an equilibrium T-dot{m} relation into the heating and cooling rates assumes the perturbation stays on the equilibrium branch, which is precisely what the criterion is meant to test. The numerical verification in Figure 7 is described only as following the method of Paper I, so the reader cannot tell whether it evaluates perturbations at fixed Sigma. Because the assertion of thermal stability is load-bearing for the existence claim, the authors should either present a proper fixed-Sigma perturbation calculation or explicitly show that Figure 7 varies T at constant Sigma and R.
  2. [Sections 2 and 3, Eqs. (1)-(12)] The entire analysis is built on the generalized equations of Paper I, which is an unpublished companion paper by the same authors. The derivation of these equations, the numerical method, and the parameter choices are not included here; the reader is instead referred to Paper I for even the central formulae such as Eq. (9) and the heating/cooling terms. As a result, the uniqueness and existence of the new solution cannot be checked from the present manuscript. The authors should reproduce the key derivations, or at minimum the full set of equations and their domain of validity, or clearly state that Paper I is in press and provide a preprint. This is load-bearing because every subsequent result, including the existence of the effectively optically thin flow, depends on these equations.
  3. [Section 4.2 and abstract] The claimed constraint alpha ~ 0.03 is presented as a quantitative result, but the comparison with 'average AGN spectra' appears to be visual and includes no fitting, no error bars, no treatment of absorption or reddening, and no quantitative distance metric. The abstract states that the viscosity parameter is constrained to be alpha ~ 0.03, whereas the body of the paper shows only that spectra for alpha = 0.1 'largely deviate' from the average AGN spectrum. This claim should be softened to say the model is consistent with alpha ~ 0.03, or the authors should perform a proper spectral comparison with uncertainties.
  4. [Section 3.3, Eqs. (15)-(20)] The two-step Comptonization treatment (uncomptonized spectrum followed by an ad hoc saturated Wien component and an unsaturated normalization C) is approximate, and the paper provides no quantitative accuracy estimate for the regime of interest, namely large scattering optical depth and near-saturated Comptonization. Since the multi-color Wien spectrum and the soft X-ray excess interpretation rest on this treatment, the authors should either validate the approximation against a Monte Carlo calculation in the relevant regime or clearly state the expected systematic uncertainty in the Wien component. Such a statement would also affect the alpha constraint.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 3.2] There are typos in this section: 'insection' should be 'intersection' and 'supper-massive black hole' should be 'super-massive black hole'.
  2. [Section 4.2 and conclusion] The phrase 'viscous parameter' is used where 'viscosity parameter' is meant; please correct this throughout.
  3. [Figure 4] The caption and text refer to 'the red, solid parabola-like curve', but in a black-and-white print the red lines are indistinguishable from black lines; please add line-style labels or a legend that identifies the effectively optically thin flow region unambiguously.
  4. [Figure 3] The line styles for the three black-hole masses are described only in the caption; the text should refer to them explicitly when discussing the mass dependence, otherwise the panel is difficult to navigate.
  5. [Eq. (22)] The text states that eta_br is 'non-sensitive to the temperature', but Eq. (22) contains eta_br^{-2} so the temperature sensitivity of eta_br should be quantified before this statement is used in the stability argument.
  6. [Section 3.1] The statement in the abstract and text that the flow is 'viscously unstable, indicating its existence' is not self-evident; viscous instability can lead to limit cycles or outbursts, so the authors should clarify what they mean by existence in this context.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Thermal-stability proof in §3.4 uses the equilibrium T–ṁ relation (Eq. 22) to verify the stability criterion, making the 'thermally stable, hence exists' claim by construction rather than a perturbation test.

  1. other [Section 3.4, Eqs. (21)–(23) and Fig. 7]
    "We write the cooling rate as Q− = 2Frad ≈ 2ηbr qbr H ... to express the mid-plane temperature as follows, T ≈ 1.2×10^19 ηbr^{-2}(c′fΞ)^6 α^4 ṁ^{-4} K. ... With Eq.(22), the effectively optically thin accretion flows satisfies the stability criterion (23), d(1−f)Q+/dT < dQ−/dT."

    Eq. (22) is an equilibrium relation obtained by imposing Q− = 2ηbr qbr H on the stationary solution sequence parameterized by ṁ in Eq. (21); along that sequence T decreases steeply with ṁ and Q+/Q− follow the branch. The thermal-stability criterion (23) requires derivatives at fixed surface density for a perturbed state, but substituting Eq. (22) evaluates dQ±/dT along the equilibrium branch itself (T ∝ ṁ^{-4}, with Q+ ∝ ṁ). The inequality is therefore inherited from the constructed equilibrium locus, not from a constant-Σ perturbation response; the proof assumes the flow stays on the branch whose stability is being tested. The conclusion 'thermally stable' is thus built into the equilibrium parametrization.

full rationale

The discovery of the effectively optically thin branch is an output of solving the stated generalized equations (1)–(12), so the branch's existence in the model is not circular; it does not assume the branch before solving. The α~0.03 constraint also has a partly external anchor in the King et al. variability estimate, although the spectral comparison is coupled to the observed AGN continuum. The load-bearing circular step is the stability proof of §3.4: Eq. (22) is a relation among equilibrium states, and the paper directly uses it to assert criterion (23). Since the abstract and conclusion advertise the stability analysis as proof that the flow 'exists in accreting systems,' the stability/existence support partially reduces by construction. The companion-paper dependence (Paper I) is a verifiability concern but not itself circular, because the equations are standard and the new solution is not hidden in the input. Overall score 6: one central 'prediction' is by construction, while the rest of the derivation retains independent content.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the unified accretion equations from the authors' own Paper I, which are not independently published, and on several physical approximations (Newtonian framework, one-zone vertical structure, diffusion radiative transfer, two-step Comptonization). The free parameters include the viscosity alpha (fitted to observations), the magnetic equipartition beta (chosen), and the absorption edge (modeling choice).

free parameters (3)
  • Viscosity parameter alpha = 0.03 (constrained from AGN spectra; also explored at 0.1, 0.3, 1)
    Controls angular momentum transport and radial velocity; the existence and extent of the effectively optically thin flow depend strongly on it. The value 0.03 is inferred by matching predicted spectra to average AGN spectra (Section 4.2).
  • Magnetic parameter beta (pg/(pg+pm)) = 0.5 (pm = pg)
    Assumed equipartition between gas and magnetic pressure, following Paper I. This choice affects the pressure balance and the location of the flow's parameter space.
  • Absorption edge frequency for Comptonization = nu_br = nu_ff (free-free optical depth unity)
    The choice of the self-absorption frequency for seed photons affects Compton cooling and hence temperature. The paper tests alternatives (nu_syn, nu_t, nu_coh) and finds the temperature difference is not large, but the value is not uniquely determined.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Newtonian gravity is used; the flow is steady and axisymmetric, described by height-integrated one-zone equations (continuity, momentum, hydrostatic equilibrium, energy).
    Section 2. The model does not include general relativistic effects, yet the innermost region is 5 Rs where GR could be important.
  • ad hoc to paper The generalized energy equations from Paper I are valid for all accretion regimes, including the effectively optically thin regime.
    Equations (5) and (6) are taken from Liu et al. (2025), an unpublished companion paper by the same authors. The validity of the unified description in the new regime is assumed.
  • domain assumption The radiation pressure and radiative flux are described by a diffusion approximation (Eq. 10) even where the effective optical depth is below unity.
    Section 2, Eq. (10). In the effectively optically thin limit, the diffusion approximation may break down, but the paper uses it throughout.
  • domain assumption The spectral calculation can be separated into a no-Comptonization emergent spectrum followed by a Comptonization step using the saturated fraction model (Eqs. 15-20).
    Section 2, following Manmoto et al. (1997) and Czerny & Elvis (1987). This two-step approach is an approximation for large scattering optical depth.
  • domain assumption Thermal stability can be assessed locally using simplified heating and cooling rates with the bremsstrahlung cooling formula and eta ~ 3 theta_e / x.
    Section 3.4. The analysis neglects magnetic and advective effects in the perturbation, and the 'proof' relies on this approximation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The effectively optically thin accretion flow and its implication in supermassive black holes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UTZYRQES

@misc{pith2026250622904,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The effectively optically thin accretion flow and its implication in supermassive black holes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UTZYRQES}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.22904}
}
abstract

Based on a unified description of various accretion flows, we find a long-ignored solution - the effectively optically thin accretion flow, occurring at accretion rates around Eddington value. As a consequence of radiation-pressure dominance, the density in a standard thin disc (SSD) decreases with the increase of accretion rates, making the innermost region effectively optically thin. Further increase in accretion rate leads to a rise of the temperature so that the Compton cooling is able to balance the accretion released energy. We demonstrate that the effectively optically thin flow is characterized by moderate temperature and large scattering optical depth, producing a multi-color Wien spectrum. For an appropriate accretion rate, the accretion flow transforms from an outer SSD to an inner effectively optically thin flow. Thus, the spectra of the whole accretion flow exhibit two components, i.e., a multi-color Wien spectrum at higher frequency and a multi-color blackbody, the former could provide an alternative origin of soft X-ray excess or formation of warm corona in active galactic nuclei (AGNs). Our stability analysis proves it is thermally stable and viscously unstable, indicating its existence in accreting systems. We show that effectively optically thin accretion flow exists in supermassive black holes for accretion rates around 0.1 to 10 times Eddington value, bridging the SSD at low accretion rates and slim disc at high rates. By comparing the predictions and average spectra of AGN, we constrain the viscosity parameter to be $\alpha \sim 0.03$, in good agreement with that derived from observed variability.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.22904 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The effective optical depth, advection fraction of energy, electron temperatures at mid-plane (mid-plane temperature hereafter), pressures, surface density, and volume cooling rates of the solution with effectively optically thin accretion flow as the functions of mass accretion rates at the distance of 5 𝑅S for 𝑚 = 108 , 𝛼 = 0.1, and 𝑝m = 𝑝g. The effectively optically thin parts are marked in red. an optically thin… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. The parameter spaces in the 𝑚¤ − 𝑟 plane of the ADAF, the SLE, the SSD, the slim disc, and the effectively optically thin accretion flow for 𝑚 = 10 (solid lines) and 108 (dotted lines), 𝛼 = 0.05 (black) and 0.1 (red), and 𝑝m = 𝑝g. its effect on the spectra is not much different from color correction. Only for large viscosity (say 𝛼 = 0.3) could it become strong. The results are displayed in the lower panels of [PIT… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The radial profiles of effective optical depth (upper panel) and mid-plane temperature (lower panel) for 𝑚 = 108 , 𝛼 = 0.1 and 𝑝m = 𝑝g, at 𝑚¤ = 0.1 (dashed line), 1 (dash-dotted line), and 10 (solid line). 10 2 10 1 10 0 10 1 10 2 M / MEdd 10 5 10 6 10 7 10 8 10 9 Te (K) 10 M 10 6M 10 8M [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The mid-plane temperature as a function of mass accretion rate at the distance of 5𝑅S for different black hole masses, where 𝛼 = 0.1, and 𝑝m = 𝑝g are adopted. The results for 𝑚 = 10, 106 and 108 are represented by solid, dot-dashed, and dotted lines, respectively. 10 1…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The generalized solutions in the 𝑚¤ − Σ plane at the distance of 5 𝑅S for 𝑚 = 108 , 𝑝m = 𝑝g, 𝛼 = 0.1 (the left panel) and 𝛼 = 1 (the right panel). The effectively optically thin accretion flow (solid lines), ADAF (dashed lines), SLE (dotted lines), SSD (dash-dotted lin…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The spectra for 𝑚 = 108 (upper panels) and 10 (lower panels), 𝛼 = 0.03 (left panels), 0.1 (middle panels), and 0.3 (right panels) under the assumption of equipartion pressure, 𝑝m = 𝑝g. In each panel the spectra for accretion rate 𝑚¤ = 0.03, 0.1, 0.3, 1, 3 and 10 are ma…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The ratio between the cooling rate and heating rate as a function of ion temperature for 𝑚 = 108 , 𝑚¤ = 0.8, 𝛼 = 0.1, 𝑝m = 𝑝g, and 𝑅 = 5𝑅S. The positive slope of ratio around the equilibrium solution at 𝑄−/(1 − 𝑓 )𝑄+ = 1 indicates the solution is thermal stable. Since …
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: A schematic description of accretion flows with the effectively optically thin region for 𝛼 ∼ 0.03 (left) and 𝛼 ∼ 0.3 (right). Science Foundation of China (Grants No.12333004 and 12433005). We also acknowledge the Beijing Super Cloud Center (BSCC) for providing HPC reso…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    thebibliography @urlcharsother \@makeother \ & \# \^ \_ \ @doi @urlcharsother \@ifnextchar [ @doi@ @doi@[] @doi@[#1]#2 \@tempa #1 \@tempa\@empty http://dx.doi.org/#2 doi:#2 http://dx.doi.org/#2 #1 @eprint#1#2 @eprint@#1:#2::\@nil @eprint@arXiv#1 http://arxiv.org/abs/#1 arXiv:#1 @eprint@dblp#1 http://dblp.uni-trier.de/rec/bibtex/#1.xml dblp:#1 @eprint@#1:#...

    work page

  2. [2]

    A., Czerny B., Lasota J

    Abramowicz M. A., Czerny B., Lasota J. P., Szuszkiewicz E., 1988, @doi [ ] 10.1086/166683 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988ApJ...332..646A 332, 646

    doi:10.1086/166683 1988

  3. [3]

    V., Bisnovatyi-Kogan G

    Artemova Y. V., Bisnovatyi-Kogan G. S., Igumenshchev I. V., Novikov I. D., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/496964 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...637..968A 637, 968

    work page doi:10.1086/496964 2006

  4. [5]

    A., Chen X., Lasota J.-P., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1086/177587 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996ApJ...467...99B 467, 99

    Bjoernsson G., Abramowicz M. A., Chen X., Lasota J.-P., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1086/177587 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996ApJ...467...99B 467, 99

    work page doi:10.1086/177587 1996

  5. [6]

    J., Blundell K

    Blundell S. J., Blundell K. M., 2009, Concepts in Thermal Physics . Oxford University Press, @doi 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199562091.001.0001 , https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199562091.001.0001

    arXiv 2009

  6. [7]

    J., van de Hulst H

    Brussaard P. J., van de Hulst H. C., 1962, @doi [Reviews of Modern Physics] 10.1103/RevModPhys.34.507 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1962RvMP...34..507B 34, 507

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.34.507 1962

  7. [8]

    S., 1977, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1977A&A....59..127C 59, 127

    Callahan P. S., 1977, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1977A&A....59..127C 59, 127

    work page 1977

  8. [9]

    New York: Dover

    Chandrasekhar S., 1967, An introduction to the study of stellar structure . New York: Dover

    work page 1967

Show all 57 references
  1. [10]

    Chen L.-H., Wang J.-M., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/423416 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...614..101C 614, 101

    2004 doi

  2. [11]

    A., Lasota J.-P., Narayan R., Yi I., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1086/187836 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ApJ...443L..61C 443, L61

    Chen X., Abramowicz M. A., Lasota J.-P., Narayan R., Yi I., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1086/187836 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ApJ...443L..61C 443, L61

    1995 doi

  3. [12]

    D., 1983, Principles of stellar evolution and nucleosynthesis

    Clayton D. D., 1983, Principles of stellar evolution and nucleosynthesis . Chicago: University of Chicago Press

    1983

  4. [13]

    C., Gallo L., Ross R

    Crummy J., Fabian A. C., Gallo L., Ross R. R., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09844.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006MNRAS.365.1067C 365, 1067

    2006

  5. [14]

    Czerny B., Elvis M., 1987, @doi [ ] 10.1086/165630 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1987ApJ...321..305C 321, 305

    1987 doi

  6. [15]

    D., Liang E

    Dermer C. D., Liang E. P., Canfield E., 1991, @doi [ ] 10.1086/169770 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991ApJ...369..410D 369, 410

    1991 doi

  7. [16]

    W., Jin C., Blaes O., Ward M., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19779.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.420.1848D 420, 1848

    Done C., Davis S. W., Jin C., Blaes O., Ward M., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19779.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.420.1848D 420, 1848

    2012

  8. [17]

    Elvis M., et al., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1086/192093 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994ApJS...95....1E 95, 1

    1994 doi

  9. [18]

    J., 2002, Accretion Power in Astrophysics: Third Edition

    Frank J., King A., Raine D. J., 2002, Accretion Power in Astrophysics: Third Edition . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    2002

  10. [19]

    Gierli \'n ski M., Done C., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07687.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004MNRAS.349L...7G 349, L7

    2004

  11. [20]

    Greene J., 1959, @doi [ ] 10.1086/146759 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1959ApJ...130..693G 130, 693

    1959 doi

  12. [21]

    Hubeny I., 1990, @doi [ ] 10.1086/168501 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990ApJ...351..632H 351, 632

    1990 doi

  13. [22]

    Ichimaru S., 1977, @doi [ ] 10.1086/155314 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1977ApJ...214..840I 214, 840

    1977 doi

  14. [23]

    Jin C., Done C., Ward M., 2017a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx718 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.468.3663J 468, 3663

    doi

  15. [24]

    Jin C., Done C., Ward M., Gardner E., 2017b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx1634 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.471..706J 471, 706

    doi

  16. [25]

    P., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055259 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ARA&A..55..303K 55, 303

    Kaaret P., Feng H., Roberts T. P., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055259 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ARA&A..55..303K 55, 303

    2017 doi

  17. [26]

    Kyoto University Press

    Kato S., Fukue J., Mineshige S., 2008, Black-Hole Accretion Disks --- Towards a New Paradigm --- . Kyoto University Press

    2008

  18. [27]

    I., 1977, @doi [ ] 10.1086/155355 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1977ApJ...215..265K 215, 265

    Katz J. I., 1977, @doi [ ] 10.1086/155355 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1977ApJ...215..265K 215, 265

    1977 doi

  19. [28]

    R., Pringle J

    King A. R., Pringle J. E., Livio M., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11556.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007MNRAS.376.1740K 376, 1740

    2007

  20. [29]

    S., Bisnovatyi-Kogan G

    Klepnev A. S., Bisnovatyi-Kogan G. S., 2010, @doi [Astrophysics] 10.1007/s10511-010-9132-y , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010Ap.....53..409K 53, 409

    2010 doi

  21. [30]

    C., Ricci C., Trakhtenbrot B., 2024a, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad77a5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...975...50L 975, 50

    Li R., Ho L. C., Ricci C., Trakhtenbrot B., 2024a, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad77a5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...975...50L 975, 50

    doi

  22. [31]

    C., Trakhtenbrot B., Kara E., Masterson M., Arcavi I., 2024b, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7aed , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...975..140L 975, 140

    Li R., Ricci C., Ho L. C., Trakhtenbrot B., Kara E., Masterson M., Arcavi I., 2024b, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7aed , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...975..140L 975, 140

    doi

  23. [32]

    P., Nolan P

    Liang E. P., Nolan P. L., 1984, @doi [ ] 10.1007/BF00176834 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1984SSRv...38..353L 38, 353

    1984 doi

  24. [33]

    P., Shapiro S

    Lightman A. P., Shapiro S. L., 1975, @doi [ ] 10.1086/181815 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1975ApJ...198L..73L 198, L73

    1975 doi

  25. [34]

    F., Wang Y., Cheng H., Yuan W., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staf459 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.tmp..440L

    Liu M., Liu B. F., Wang Y., Cheng H., Yuan W., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staf459 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.tmp..440L

    2025 doi

  26. [35]

    M., Zdziarski A

    Magdziarz P., Blaes O. M., Zdziarski A. A., Johnson W. N., Smith D. A., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.02015.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998MNRAS.301..179M 301, 179

    1998

  27. [36]

    A., 1983, @doi [ ] 10.1086/160981 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983ApJ...268..582M 268, 582

    Malkan M. A., 1983, @doi [ ] 10.1086/160981 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983ApJ...268..582M 268, 582

    1983 doi

  28. [37]

    A., Sargent W

    Malkan M. A., Sargent W. L. W., 1982, @doi [ ] 10.1086/159701 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1982ApJ...254...22M 254, 22

    1982 doi

  29. [38]

    Manmoto T., Mineshige S., Kusunose M., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1086/304817 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ApJ...489..791M 489, 791

    1997 doi

  30. [39]

    R., van den Oord G

    Mewe R., Lemen J. R., van den Oord G. H. J., 1986, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1986A&AS...65..511M 65, 511

    1986

  31. [40]

    W., 1984, Foundations of radiation hydrodynamics

    Mihalas D., Mihalas B. W., 1984, Foundations of radiation hydrodynamics . New York: Oxford University Press

    1984

  32. [41]

    Narayan R., Yi I., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1086/187381 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994ApJ...428L..13N 428, L13

    1994 doi

  33. [42]

    Narayan R., Yi I., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1086/176343 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ApJ...452..710N 452, 710

    1995 doi

  34. [43]

    D., Thorne K

    Novikov I. D., Thorne K. S., 1973, in Black Holes (Les Astres Occlus). pp 343--450

    1973

  35. [44]

    O., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201219956 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...549A..73P 549, A73

    Petrucci P. O., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201219956 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...549A..73P 549, A73

    2013 doi

  36. [45]

    Petrucci P. O., Ursini F., De Rosa A., Bianchi S., Cappi M., Matt G., Dadina M., Malzac J., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201731580 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...611A..59P 611, A59

    2018 doi

  37. [46]

    J., 1988, @doi [ ] 10.1038/333523a0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988Natur.333..523R 333, 523

    Rees M. J., 1988, @doi [ ] 10.1038/333523a0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988Natur.333..523R 333, 523

    1988 doi

  38. [47]

    A., McClintock J

    Remillard R. A., McClintock J. E., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.astro.44.051905.092532 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ARA&A..44...49R 44, 49

    2006 arXiv

  39. [48]

    B., Lightman A

    Rybicki G. B., Lightman A. P., 1979, Radiative processes in astrophysics . Wiley

    1979

  40. [49]

    J., Coroniti F

    Sakimoto P. J., Coroniti F. V., 1981, @doi [ ] 10.1086/159005 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1981ApJ...247...19S 247, 19

    1981 doi

  41. [50]

    I., Sunyaev R

    Shakura N. I., Sunyaev R. A., 1973, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1973A&A....24..337S 24, 337

    1973

  42. [51]

    L., Lightman A

    Shapiro S. L., Lightman A. P., Eardley D. M., 1976, @doi [ ] 10.1086/154162 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1976ApJ...204..187S 204, 187

    1976 doi

  43. [52]

    pp 48--51 ( @eprint arXiv 0711.2448 ), @doi 10.48550/arXiv.0711.2448

    Soria R., Wu K., Kunic Z., 2008, in Carpano S., Ehle M., Pietsch W., eds, X-rays From Nearby Galaxies. pp 48--51 ( @eprint arXiv 0711.2448 ), @doi 10.48550/arXiv.0711.2448

    2008 doi arXiv

  44. [53]

    A., Titarchuk L

    Sunyaev R. A., Titarchuk L. G., 1980, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1980A&A....86..121S 86, 121

    1980

  45. [54]

    S., Price R

    Thorne K. S., Price R. H., 1975, @doi [ ] 10.1086/181720 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1975ApJ...195L.101T 195, L101

    1975 doi

  46. [55]

    J., Nardini E., Fabian A

    Walton D. J., Nardini E., Fabian A. C., Gallo L. C., Reis R. C., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sts227 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.428.2901W 428, 2901

    2013 doi

  47. [56]

    Wandel A., Petrosian V., 1988, @doi [ ] 10.1086/185166 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988ApJ...329L..11W 329, L11

    1988 doi

  48. [57]

    G., Stone N

    Wen S., Jonker P. G., Stone N. C., Zabludoff A. I., Psaltis D., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab9817 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...897...80W 897, 80

    2020 doi

  49. [58]

    C., Gallo L

    Zoghbi A., Fabian A. C., Gallo L. C., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14078.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.391.2003Z 391, 2003

    2008

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.