Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 49 references

Characterizing the Nature of Periodic Amplitude Modulation in Pulsars

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Periodic amplitude modulation, not subpulse drifting, can produce the phase shifts seen in pulsar fluctuation spectra.

desk verdict A useful observational taxonomy with a real circularity problem in the state separation; the qualitative evidence is credible but the quantitative claims need robustness checks before they carry weight. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.04262 v1 pith:UURTIMIC submitted 2025-09-04 astro-ph.HE

Rahul Basu , Dipanjan Mitra , George I. Melikidze This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords pulsarsperiodicamplitudemodulationsubpulsedriftingsinglepulsesequencefluctuationspectraradioemissionstatesP2classification
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that periodic amplitude modulation—where a pulsar regularly switches between bright and weak intensity states—is a distinct emission phenomenon, separate from subpulse drifting. Using single-pulse sequences from seventeen pulsars, six newly detected, it shows that these modulations fall into three categories: phase-stationary, phase-shifted, and intermittent. It proposes a statistical scheme that recovers the modulation periodicity from a simple 0/1 state sequence, demonstrating that the periodicity comes from state switching rather than subpulse motion. If correct, non-zero phase slopes in fluctuation spectra are not sufficient evidence for subpulse drifting, and a large share of recent survey classifications of drifters should be reassigned to periodic amplitude modulation.

What carries the argument

The key machinery is an iterative statistical state-separation scheme: single-pulse energies above a cutoff F times the standard deviation from the median are marked as '1' and the rest as '0', and F is scanned to maximize the signal-to-noise ratio of the periodic feature in the Fourier transform of this 0/1 sequence. The optimal cutoff defines the bright and weak emission states, whose average profiles are compared. The scheme isolates the modulation periodicity from state transitions alone, and the P2 versus W10/2 comparison is the classification tool applied to survey data.

What would settle it

For a source the paper reclassifies as phase-shifted modulation, such as PSR B1642-03, take a high-sensitivity single-pulse sequence and track subpulse positions during the bright state. If subpulses move monotonically across the window with the reported P2 of about 49 degrees while the state remains bright, the drift interpretation survives; if the bright state simply occupies a fixed, different longitude window, the paper's interpretation is supported.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that non-zero phase variations across the emission window—quantified as P2 in two-dimensional fluctuation spectra—are not proof of subpulse drifting. In several pulsars the bright and weak emission states have different profile widths or peak locations, so the apparent phase gradient is an intensity-state effect, not a systematic motion of subpulses. The paper supports this by reproducing the modulation feature from the Fourier transform of a 0/1 state sequence that discards all subpulse structure, and by showing that single-pulse sequences display no drift bands. It then proposes that in large survey data only pulsars with P2 smaller than half the profile width should b

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the cutoff level chosen to maximize the periodic signal genuinely separates the pulsar's two physical emission states; if the intensity distribution is not bimodal or the threshold manufactures artificial states, the phase-shift and window-width interpretations lose their support.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Phase slopes in longitude-resolved fluctuation spectra cannot by themselves identify subpulse drifting; single-pulse inspection is necessary.
  • A large fraction of pulsars previously classified as drifters in survey data, those with P2 larger than half the profile width, should be reclassified as phase-shifted periodic amplitude modulation.
  • The genuine subpulse-drifting population remains concentrated at low spin-down energy, preserving the physical distinction between drifting and periodic amplitude modulation.
  • Periodic amplitude modulation can be reproduced from binary state-switching alone, meaning it originates in the transition between two emission states rather than in subpulse motion.
  • Six new detections broaden the known sample of periodic amplitude modulation and show it spans a wide range of pulsar energetics.
  • The paper's phase-shift and window-width evidence provides a practical way to separate the three categories in future single-pulse studies.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same 0/1 state-separation scheme could be applied systematically to periodic nulling, possibly unifying the classification of all periodic single-pulse phenomena under a single state-switching framework.
  • If the P2 reclassification holds, the true drifter fraction in the large survey is considerably smaller than reported, so published drifter catalogues and population studies may need revision.
  • The three categories may represent a continuum of the same underlying mechanism: whole-window modulation gives phase-stationary behaviour, sub-window modulation gives phase shifts, and time-variable switching gives intermittency; the paper does not propose a physical model for this continuum.
  • Observing frequency and sensitivity could alter classification, since weak states are more easily missed at lower sensitivity, so multi-frequency single-pulse observations could test whether the categories are intrinsic to the pulsar or band-dependent.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports single-pulse analysis of 17 pulsars exhibiting periodic amplitude modulation (PAM), and proposes an iterative statistical scheme in which a cutoff factor FB is chosen by maximizing the SNR of the periodic feature in the FFT of a binarized pulse-energy sequence. The authors use this scheme to separate 'bright' and 'weak' emission states, characterize their abundances, widths, and intensity ratios, and divide the sources into three categories: phase-stationary modulation, phase-shifted modulation, and intermittent modulation. The central claim is that phase-shifted PAM produces non-zero phase slopes and P2 values in fluctuation spectra even though no systematic subpulse drifting is present in the single-pulse sequences. On this basis, the paper argues that survey classifications relying on P2 alone over-identify subpulse drifting, and proposes a reclassification of the Song et al. (2023) pulsar sample into P2 < W10/2 (likely drifting), P2 > W10/2 (likely phase-shifted PAM), and P3-only features.

Significance. If the two-state separation is physically meaningful, the paper provides a valuable advance: it adds six new PAM detections, gives a detailed single-pulse phenomenology for seventeen sources, and challenges the use of fluctuation-spectrum phase slopes alone as a drifting diagnostic. The visual single-pulse sequences give some independent, qualitative support for state switching, and the authors are transparent about the tentative nature of the population-level reclassification. However, the quantitative case hinges on a threshold that is tuned to maximize the target periodicity, and the paper does not yet establish that the inferred states are real physical states rather than threshold artifacts. The central distinction from subpulse drifting therefore needs additional validation before the survey-level conclusions can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2, Fig. 2(b)] The cutoff FB is chosen by scanning F to maximize the SNR of the periodic feature in the FFT of the 0/1 sequence. The later claim in Section 4 that the 0/1 FFT 'reproduces' the LRFS feature and that periodicity arises purely from state transitions is therefore largely circular: the threshold is selected to make exactly that feature prominent. To support the two-state hypothesis, the authors should provide independent evidence, e.g., single-pulse energy histograms with a bimodality/dip test, or a robustness analysis showing that state abundances, widths, and intensity ratios are stable across a plausible range of F around FB. Without this, the quantities in Table 2 inherit the SNR tuning and cannot be treated as physical state properties.
  2. [Section 3.2, Fig. 4] The identification of phase-shifted PAM in sources such as B0905-51, B1642-03, and B1737-39 relies on differences between average profiles of states defined by a threshold on pulse energy. If the underlying intensity distribution is continuous/unimodal, any threshold will produce a 'bright' and a 'weak' profile with different effective widths and centroids, creating apparent phase shifts and window widening. The paper does not demonstrate bimodality or provide a control, e.g., applying the same procedure to a source with known continuous intensity variations but no physical states. Because the central claim is that phase shifts can occur without subpulse drifting, excluding this threshold artifact is load-bearing.
  3. [Section 4, Fig. 5] The reclassification of the Song et al. (2023) sample into P2 < W10/2 (drifting) and P2 > W10/2 (phase-shifted PAM) relies on an ad hoc criterion that is not validated by the present sample. The counts 152/295/134 are used to support the conclusion that a large fraction of P2 detections are actually PAM. Given the threshold-dependence of the phase-shift interpretation in Sections 2 and 3, this population-level claim requires a concrete validation: e.g., synthetic single-pulse sequences with known drifting/PAM parameters, or a comparison against single-pulse movies for a subsample of Song et al. sources. As presented, the numbers are a tentative hypothesis, not an established result.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Table 1] The profile classification symbols (S_t, T, D, T1/2, D/cT, etc.) are not defined in the text or table caption. Please define or cite the classification scheme.
  2. [Figure 2 and Section 2] The text refers to 'Fig. 2(a)' and 'Fig. 2(b)' while the caption uses 'left panel' and 'right panel'. Please make the references consistent.
  3. [Section 4] The phrase 'P2 values of modulation' is grammatically awkward; consider 'the P2 values of the modulation' or similar.
  4. [Section 3.1] For PSR B1929+10 the text says the bright state lasts 'around 70%' of the duration, while Table 2 lists 68.2% ± 1.6%. The values are consistent within uncertainties, but the wording should reflect the quantitative entry.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The 0/1 FFT 'reproduction' of the periodic feature is guaranteed by the SNR-maximizing cutoff fit, making the claim that the periodicity arises purely from state transitions partly circular.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Sec. 2 (statistical scheme, Fig. 2b) and Sec. 4 (Discussion)]
    "The SNR of the periodic feature in the average FFT spectra is estimated and the process is repeated with a different F till the highest sensitivity is reached, which corresponds to F = FB. ... we were able to reproduce the periodic feature from the FFT of the '0/1' sequence corresponding to the two states with the same sensitivity as the average LRFS. In this sequence all information about subpulse structure within the single pulses are washed away demonstrating that the periodicity arises purely from the transition between the two states."

    The 0/1 sequence is produced by thresholding single-pulse energies at M + FB σ, where FB is chosen by maximizing the SNR of the periodic feature in the FFT of that same 0/1 sequence. Thus the high-SNR feature in the 0/1 FFT is the objective function of the fit, not an independent outcome. Reproducing the LRFS feature from the 0/1 FFT is therefore a restatement of the construction: a threshold tuned to maximize SNR at the known periodic frequency will, by construction, place that periodicity into the binary sequence. The statement that the periodicity 'arises purely from the transition between the two states' also builds the conclusion into the definition, because the 'two states' are defined as the two sides of that same threshold. The absence of subpulse structure is likewise by construct

full rationale

The paper contains one genuinely circular step: the cutoff FB is fitted per pulsar by maximizing the SNR of the periodic feature in the FFT of the 0/1 sequence, and the same 0/1 FFT is then presented as reproducing the periodicity and as proof that the modulation arises purely from state transitions. That inference is statistically forced by the fitting procedure and cannot independently validate the two-state interpretation. I do not raise the score to 8 or 10 because the central taxonomy still possesses independent content: the visual single-pulse sequences (Fig. 3) and average-state profile comparisons provide separate evidence for real intensity-state transitions in at least some pulsars, and the Sec. 4 reclassification of the Song et al. (2023) sample is explicitly labeled tentative. The threshold-dependence of the phase-shift/window-widening interpretation is a real correctness risk, since no bimodality test is shown, but the phase shifts are also visible in the pulse-sequence images, so I treat that as a validity concern rather than a second fully circular step. No load-bearing self-citation chain or imported uniqueness theorem was found.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The two emission states are operational labels derived from a fitted cutoff, not independently established physical states, which is the main ledger burden. The P2-to-W10 threshold is a heuristic used for population-level classification.

free parameters (2)
  • FB cutoff factor per pulsar = Table 2 values, e.g. B1642-03: 1.2, B0905-51: -0.46, B2011+38: 0.36
    Threshold in units of standard deviation above median pulse energy used to define the 0/1 emission states. Chosen by scanning F to maximize the SNR of the periodic feature in the FFT, so state abundances, intensity ratios, and state profiles depend on this fitted value.
  • Longitude window for pulse-energy estimation = Not tabulated; shown as dashed vertical lines in Fig 3
    The longitude range over which single-pulse energies are measured is chosen by eye to highlight the modulation, affecting the energy distribution and the resulting state separation.
assumptions (3)
  • standard math FFT, LRFS, and 2DFS spectral methods reliably estimate periodicities and phase variations from single pulse sequences
    Standard tools (Backer 1973; Edwards and Stappers 2002) used without re-derivation.
  • domain assumption Pulsar single pulse emission can be represented as two discrete intensity states separated by a threshold on integrated energy
    The cutoff scheme assumes bimodality; the paper itself notes B0450+55 was difficult due to scintillation, and some sources show continuous intensity variation.
  • ad hoc to paper P2 > W10/2 implies phase-shifted periodic amplitude modulation rather than subpulse drifting
    Used in Sec 4 to reclassify 295 features from Song et al. (2023). The authors call the result tentative and say proper classification requires single pulse inspection.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Characterizing the Nature of Periodic Amplitude Modulation in Pulsars." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UURTIMIC

@misc{pith2026250904262,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Characterizing the Nature of Periodic Amplitude Modulation in Pulsars},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UURTIMIC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.04262}
}
read the original abstract

In recent years periodic amplitude modulation has emerged as a unique emission feature in the single pulse sequence of pulsars alongside periodic nulling and subpulse drifting. Despite ample evidence for the uniqueness of this phenomenon, the periodic modulation in several pulsars are often confused with subpulse drifting, primarily due to lack of clear characterisation of the emission features from a representative sample of pulsars. In this work we present a detailed analysis of the single pulse behaviour from seventeen pulsars exhibiting periodic amplitude modulation, six of them being new detections. The pulsar switches between different intensity states as a result of periodic amplitude modulation and we propose a novel statistical scheme to identify these emission states. The periodic modulation can be divided into three broad categories, phase stationary modulation, modulations with phase shift and intermittent periodic modulations. The phase stationary behaviour is seen when the emission intensity across a major part of the pulse window changes periodically. The phase shifts are associated with intensity changes at specific locations within the emission window in a periodic manner; while in some pulsars the periodic modulations become more prominent only at specific intervals resulting in intermittent behaviour.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.04262 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) A short single pulse sequence of PSR B1642-03 with periodic amplitude modulation. (b) The lower window shows the average intensity of each pulse estimated within the longitude range specified by the two vertical dashed lines in the left panel. A statistical cutoff level for the two emission states is shown as the horizontal, red-dashed line and the top window shows the 0/1 time sequence obtained using this cutof… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) The time varying longitude-resolved fluctuation spectra (LRFS) estimated on the single pulse sequence of PSR B1642-03, showing the broad periodic amplitude modulation feature between frequency range 0.05–0.1 cycles/P. (b) The 0/1 time series FFT is estimated for different cutoff levels and the signal to noise ratio (SNR) of the periodic feature is shown in the top window. The maximum SNR corresponds to 1.2 times… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Single pulse sequence showing the nature of the periodic amplitude modulation in each pulsar. The dotted lines show the longitude window within which the average intensities are estimated for the state separation studies [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The average profiles of the brighter (black) and weaker (dotted red) intensity states of periodic amplitude modulation. In some cases scaled up versions of weaker state profiles are also shown to better highlight the emission features. the weak state and the bright sta…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The distribution of the different categories of periodic behaviour with E˙ , from the survey of pulsars reported in X. Song et al. (2023). The left panel shows the pulsars with P2 < W10/2 which likely represent the subpulse drifting population along with the line showi…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The left panel shows the time varying longitude-resolved fluctuation spectra (LRFS) estimated on the single pulse sequence. The 0/1 time series FFT is estimated for different cutoff levels and the signal to noise ratio (SNR) of the periodic feature is shown in the top …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The left panel shows the time varying longitude-resolved fluctuation spectra (LRFS) estimated on the single pulse sequence. The 0/1 time series FFT is estimated for different cutoff levels and the signal to noise ratio (SNR) of the periodic feature is shown in the top …
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The periodic behaviour from different pulse sequence of the same pulsar. The left panel shows the LRFS with prominent periodic modulation while the right panel shows diffuse structure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The periodic behaviour from different pulse sequence of the same pulsar. The left panel shows the LRFS with prominent periodic modulation while the right panel shows diffuse structure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The left panel shows the time varying average LRFS for pulsars with intermittent periodic modulation. The right panel shows the LRFS from a specific pulse sequence with more prominent periodic feature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Backer, D. C. 1973, ApJ, 182, 245, doi: 10.1086/152134

    doi:10.1086/152134 1973

  2. [2]

    2020a, MNRAS, 499, 906, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2398

    Basu, R., Lewandowski, W., & Kijak, J. 2020a, MNRAS, 499, 906, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2398

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2398

  3. [3]

    I., & Mitra, D

    Basu, R., Melikidze, G. I., & Mitra, D. 2022, ApJ, 936, 35, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8479

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac8479 2022

  4. [4]

    2018, MNRAS, 475, 5098, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty178

    Basu, R., & Mitra, D. 2018, MNRAS, 475, 5098, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty178

    doi:10.1093/mnras/sty178 2018

  5. [5]

    2019, MNRAS, 487, 4536, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1590

    Basu, R., & Mitra, D. 2019, MNRAS, 487, 4536, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1590

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1590 2019

  6. [6]

    Basu, R., Mitra, D., & Melikidze, G. I. 2017, ApJ, 846, 109, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa862d

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa862d 2017

  7. [7]

    Basu, R., Mitra, D., & Melikidze, G. I. 2020b, ApJ, 889, 133, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab63c9

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab63c9

  8. [8]

    Basu, R., Mitra, D., & Melikidze, G. I. 2023a, ApJ, 947, 86, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acc6c6

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acc6c6

Show all 49 references
  1. [9]

    Basu, R., Mitra, D., & Melikidze, G. I. 2023b, ApJ, 959, 92, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad083d

    doi

  2. [10]

    I., et al

    Basu, R., Mitra, D., Melikidze, G. I., et al. 2016, ApJ, 833, 29, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/833/1/29

    2016 doi

  3. [11]

    I., & Skrzypczak, A

    Basu, R., Mitra, D., Melikidze, G. I., & Skrzypczak, A. 2019, MNRAS, 482, 3757, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2846

    2019 doi

  4. [12]

    2019, MNRAS, 484, 2725, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz020

    Brinkman, C., Mitra, D., & Rankin, J. 2019, MNRAS, 484, 2725, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz020

    2019 doi

  5. [13]

    2025, ApJ, 986, 105, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/add1b6

    Chang, K., Wang, N., Kou, F., et al. 2025, ApJ, 986, 105, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/add1b6

    2025 doi

  6. [14]

    L., Wen, Z

    Chen, J. L., Wen, Z. G., Duan, X. F., et al. 2023, ApJ, 946, 2, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acbd97

    2023 doi

  7. [15]

    L., Wen, Z

    Chen, J. L., Wen, Z. G., Wang, Z., et al. 2024, ApJ, 961, 114, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0f94

    2024 doi

  8. [16]

    D., & Craft, H

    Drake, F. D., & Craft, H. D. 1968, Nature, 220, 231, doi: 10.1038/220231a0

    1968 doi

  9. [17]

    T., & Stappers, B

    Edwards, R. T., & Stappers, B. W. 2002, A&A, 393, 733, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20021067

    2002 doi

  10. [18]

    M., & Rankin, J

    Force, M. M., & Rankin, J. M. 2010, MNRAS, 406, 237, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16703.x

    2010

  11. [19]

    I., & Geppert, U

    Gil, J., Melikidze, G. I., & Geppert, U. 2003, A&A, 407, 315, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20030854

    2003 doi

  12. [20]

    S., et al

    Gupta, Y., Ajithkumar, B., Kale, H. S., et al. 2017, Current Science, 113, 707, doi: 10.18520/cs/v113/i04/707-714

    2017 doi

  13. [21]

    L., & Rankin, J

    Herfindal, J. L., & Rankin, J. M. 2007, MNRAS, 380, 430, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12089.x

    2007

  14. [23]

    F., Yan, W

    Kou, F. F., Yan, W. M., Peng, B., et al. 2021, ApJ, 909, 170, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abd545

    2021 doi

  15. [24]

    2012, MNRAS, 427, 180, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21985.x

    Latham, C., Mitra, D., & Rankin, J. 2012, MNRAS, 427, 180, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21985.x

    2012

  16. [25]

    Maan, Y., & Deshpande, A. A. 2014, ApJ, 792, 130, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/792/2/130

    2014 doi

  17. [26]

    N., Hobbs, G

    Manchester, R. N., Hobbs, G. B., Teoh, A., & Hobbs, M. 2005, AJ, 129, 1993, doi: 10.1086/428488

    2005 doi

  18. [27]

    2016a, ApJ, 833, 28, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/833/1/28

    Mitra, D., Basu, R., Maciesiak, K., et al. 2016a, ApJ, 833, 28, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/833/1/28

    doi

  19. [28]

    Mitra, D., Basu, R., & Melikidze, G. I. 2025, ApJ, 987, 119, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/addab1

    2025 doi

  20. [29]

    Mitra, D., Basu, R., & Melikizde, G. I. 2024, Universe, 10, 248, doi: 10.3390/universe10060248

    2024 doi

  21. [30]

    2017, MNRAS, 468, 4601, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx814

    Mitra, D., & Rankin, J. 2017, MNRAS, 468, 4601, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx814

    2017 doi

  22. [31]

    2016b, MNRAS, 460, 3063, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1186

    Mitra, D., Rankin, J., & Arjunwadkar, M. 2016b, MNRAS, 460, 3063, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1186

    doi

  23. [32]

    Mitra, D., & Rankin, J. M. 2008, MNRAS, 385, 606, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.12838.x

    2008

  24. [33]

    2021, MNRAS, 508, 4249, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2775

    Posselt, B., Karastergiou, A., Johnston, S., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 508, 4249, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2775

    2021 doi

  25. [34]

    2022, MNRAS, 514, 3202, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1302 14

    Rankin, J. 2022, MNRAS, 514, 3202, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1302 14

    2022 doi

  26. [35]

    Rankin, J. M. 1986, ApJ, 301, 901, doi: 10.1086/163955

    1986 doi

  27. [36]

    Rankin, J. M. 1993, ApJS, 85, 145, doi: 10.1086/191758

    1993 doi

  28. [37]

    M., & Rathnasree, N

    Rankin, J. M., & Rathnasree, N. 1997, Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy, 18, 91, doi: 10.1007/BF02714873

    1997 doi

  29. [38]

    W., Wang, N., et al

    Rejep, R., Zhu, W. W., Wang, N., et al. 2025, ApJ, 985, 11, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adc576

    2025 doi

  30. [39]

    2010, Experimental Astronomy, 28, 25, doi: 10.1007/s10686-010-9187-0

    Roy, J., Gupta, Y., Pen, U.-L., et al. 2010, Experimental Astronomy, 28, 25, doi: 10.1007/s10686-010-9187-0

    2010 doi

  31. [40]

    A., & Sutherland, P

    Ruderman, M. A., & Sutherland, P. G. 1975, ApJ, 196, 51, doi: 10.1086/153393

    1975 doi

  32. [41]

    2023, MNRAS, 520, 4562, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad135

    Song, X., Weltevrede, P., Szary, A., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 520, 4562, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad135

    2023 doi

  33. [42]

    K., et al

    Swarup, G., Ananthakrishnan, S., Kapahi, V. K., et al. 1991, Current Science, 60, 95

    1991

  34. [43]

    2025, PASA, 42, e011, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2024.125

    Tian, J., Xu, X., Dang, S., & Zhi, Q. 2025, PASA, 42, e011, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2024.125

    2025 doi

  35. [44]

    Q., Wang, J

    Wang, S. Q., Wang, J. B., Hobbs, G., et al. 2020, ApJ, 897, 8, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab9302

    2020 doi

  36. [45]

    Q., Wang, J

    Wang, S. Q., Wang, J. B., Wang, N., et al. 2021, ApJ, 913, 67, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abf937

    2021 doi

  37. [46]

    T., & Stappers, B

    Weltevrede, P., Edwards, R. T., & Stappers, B. W. 2006, A&A, 445, 243, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20053088

    2006 doi

  38. [47]

    G., Chen, J

    Wen, Z. G., Chen, J. L., Hao, L. F., et al. 2020, ApJ, 900, 168, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abaab7

    2020 doi

  39. [48]

    M., Manchester, R

    Yan, W. M., Manchester, R. N., Wang, N., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 491, 4634, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz3399

    2020 doi

  40. [49]

    M., Manchester, R

    Yan, W. M., Manchester, R. N., Wang, N., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 485, 3241, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz650

    2019 doi

  41. [50]

    M., Wang, N., & Yuan, J

    Zhao, D., Yan, W. M., Wang, N., & Yuan, J. P. 2023, ApJ, 959, 26, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0890 15 APPENDIX The figures corresponding to the periodic modulation measurements of each pulsar are reported in the appendix. The time varying average LRFS and the average FFT obtained...

    2023 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.