REVIEW 1 cited by
Limit Models in Strictly Stable Abstract Elementary Classes
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
In this paper, we examine the locality condition for non-splitting and determine the level of uniqueness of limit models that can be recovered in some stable, but not superstable, abstract elementary classes. In particular we prove (note that no tameness is assumed): Suppose that $\mathcal{K}$ is an abstract elementary class satisfying 1. the joint embedding and amalgamation properties with no maximal model of cardinality $\mu$. 2. stability in $\mu$. 3. $\kappa^*_\mu(\mathcal{K})<\mu^+$. 4. continuity for non-$\mu$-splitting (i.e. if $p\in\text{ga-S}(M)$ and $M$ is a limit model witnessed by $\langle M_i\mid i<\alpha\rangle$ for some limit ordinal $\alpha<\mu^+$ and there exists $N \prec M_0$ so that $p\restriction M_i$ does not $\mu$-split over $N$ for all $i<\alpha$, then $p$ does not $\mu$-split over $N$). For $\theta$ and $\delta$ limit ordinals $<\mu^+$ both with cofinality $\geq\kappa^*_\mu(\mathcal{K})$, if $\mathcal{K}$ satisfies symmetry for non-$\mu$-splitting (or just $(\mu,\delta)$-symmetry), then, for any $M_1$ and $M_2$ that are $(\mu,\theta)$ and $(\mu,\delta)$-limit models over $M_0$, respectively, we have that $M_1$ and $M_2$ are isomorphic over $M_0$.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Superstability, noetherian rings and pure-semisimple rings
Left noetherian rings are exactly those whose modules form a superstable class with embeddings, and left pure-semisimple rings are exactly those whose modules form a superstable class with pure embeddings.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.