Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 83 references

Tertiary EOR-like microfluidic experiments: influence of viscosity ratio on oil clusters mobilization

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Injecting a more viscous fluid after waterflooding raises oil recovery primarily by breaking large trapped oil clusters into smaller fragments that are then transported away, not by mobilizing whole clusters.

desk verdict A visually convincing tertiary-recovery mechanism, with cluster statistics that need threshold sensitivity and replication before the quantitative claims can be trusted. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.02296 v1 pith:UXI2M6VH submitted 2025-01-04 physics.flu-dyn

Haohong Pi , Abdelaziz Omari , Giuseppe Sciumè This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.flu-dyn PACS 47.56.+r
keywords oilclustersmobilizationbreakageviscosityratiotertiaryrecoverymicrofluidicchippore-scaledynamicsgangliabreakupcapillarydesaturationcurve
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

After a waterflood leaves oil trapped as large connected clusters, this paper asks where the extra oil comes from when a more viscous fluid is injected afterward. Using a transparent water-wet micromodel, the authors show that raising the injected viscosity from that of water to eighty times that of water substantially lowers residual oil saturation, yet the number of large ganglia barely changes while their total volume drops sharply. The missing volume reappears as blobs and droplets produced by ganglia breakup at pore throats, and these small fragments are what get transported out of the porous medium. The paper concludes that tertiary recovery by viscosity contrast is a two-step process: fast fragmentation that feeds the medium with small oil clusters, followed by slower transport of those clusters. If correct, this shifts the design question for such floods from how to move whole clusters to how to make and keep small fragments mobile.

What carries the argument

The objects that carry the analysis are the three cluster classes: droplets (area 0-0.002 mm², circularity 0.7-1), blobs (0.002-0.004 mm², circularity 0.3-1), and ganglia (area above 0.004 mm², circularity 0-0.7), where ganglia are the large clusters spanning more than one pore. Tracking the number, total volume, and average volume of each class as a function of injected pore volume is what exposes the asymmetry between a nearly constant ganglia count and a strongly decreasing ganglia volume. The physical mechanism is pore-throat breakage: the more viscous injected fluid builds pressure along pre-existing water pathways, a trapped ganglion thins and elongates at a throat, and when local pressure exceeds the critical capillary pressure the ganglion snaps, releasing a downstream fragment while the upstream part remains trapped. This two-step picture — fragmentation feeding the medium with blobs and droplets, then transport removing them — is the paper's central explanatory claim.

What would settle it

Image one isolated trapped ganglion continuously while the injected fluid viscosity is stepped up: the breakup-first mechanism predicts the ganglion thins at a pore throat, snaps into a downstream fragment that moves and an upstream remnant that remains trapped, and the small fragments reach the outlet only after a delay. Observing the whole ganglion translate without snapping, or seeing small-fragment counts rise without a transport lag, would contradict the paper's central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In a borosilicate-glass micromodel with a rock-like pore network, after oil drainage and waterflooding leave residual oil saturations around 0.4-0.5, the authors inject glycerol/water mixtures with viscosity ratios $\eta_R = 1, 4, 8, 20$, and $80$ at a fixed flow rate. Recovery rises with $\eta_R$, with the steepest gains between $\eta_R = 1$ and $20$, and the remaining oil becomes smaller and more uniformly distributed. Classifying clusters into droplets, blobs, and ganglia by area and circularity thresholds, the authors find that ganglia, although fewest in number, hold most of the oil volume; as $\eta_R$ increases the number of ganglia changes only slightly while their total volume falls sharply. The volume loss is accounted for by an initial increase and then a gradual decline in blobs and droplets, which are born from ganglia rupture, mobilized because they are weakly held by capillary forces, and carried out of the chip. Supporting images show a ganglion thinning and snapping at a pore throat within about a second, producing a downstream fragment that moves while the upstream remnant stays trapped for further breakup, and capillary-pressure estimates place the throat pressure above the pressures in the two new segments at the moment of rupture. The paper therefore proposes a breakup-first, transport-second mechanism, with the characteristic time for transport longer than that for breakage.

Load-bearing premise

The conclusion that ganglia number changes little while their volume drops sharply rests on the hand-set thresholds that define the three cluster classes, especially the 0.004 mm² boundary between blobs and ganglia; a breakup that pushes fragments below that boundary automatically moves volume out of the ganglia class by definition.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Oil recovery from a viscosity-contrast tertiary flood should be tracked by cluster-volume transfer between size classes, because total saturation alone can hide a state where ganglia counts stay flat while their volume collapses.
  • The steepest additional recovery gains occur for viscosity ratios between 1 and 20; beyond that, further viscosity increase buys less extra oil under these conditions.
  • Residual oil after an effective viscous flood should be concentrated in dead-end pores and small pore sizes, since connected ganglia in swept pathways are preferentially fragmented and removed.
  • Because transport, not breakage, is the slower step, the injection volume or time needed to finish a tertiary flood is set by how long small fragments take to exit the medium, not by how fast they are created.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the breakup-first picture generalizes, tertiary flooding formulations should be screened for two separate abilities: creating fragments at pore throats through local viscosity contrast, and keeping those fragments from re-trapping during the slower transport step.
  • A direct experimental follow-up would be to stop injection immediately after a short viscous slug and image whether fragment counts continue to change; the breakup-first picture predicts they should not once flow stops.
  • The same fragmentation-then-transport logic could apply to other three-fluid subsurface operations, such as CO2 storage or aquifer remediation, where a viscous chase fluid follows a waterflood.
  • Because the reported numbers depend on fixed area and circularity thresholds, a natural robustness check is to sweep the 0.004 mm² ganglia/blob boundary and see whether the 'nearly constant ganglia count, sharply falling ganglia volume' statement survives; the qualitative mechanism does not depend on the exact boundary.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports microfluidic experiments on tertiary oil recovery: after drainage and waterflooding of a water-wet micromodel, glycerol/water mixtures of increasing viscosity are injected, and the mobilization of residual oil clusters is imaged and quantified. Oil clusters are classified into droplets, blobs, and ganglia using size and circularity thresholds, and the authors report that increasing the viscosity ratio mainly reduces the total volume of ganglia while their number changes only slightly, which they interpret as ganglia breakup feeding the medium with blobs and droplets that are subsequently transported. The paper also compares the results with literature on cluster-size scaling and constructs a capillary desaturation curve. The central qualitative claim is supported by direct time-lapse images of ganglia breakup at pore throats.

Significance. If the quantitative support were robust, this would be a valuable pore-scale demonstration that tertiary recovery by viscosity increase operates through a two-step mechanism: rapid ganglia breakage followed by slower transport of small clusters. The direct visual evidence of breakup at pore throats (Fig. 9(d), Fig. 10) and the careful control of fluid properties and flow conditions are genuine strengths. The paper also connects its observations to earlier mechanistic hypotheses and to the capillary-desaturation-curve framework. However, the quantitative claims about cluster number and volume trends rest on hand-set classification rules without sensitivity analysis and on experiments with no reported replicates or error bars; these gaps currently weaken the evidential weight of the central new result.

major comments (4)
  1. [3.2.2]
  2. [2.4.1 and 3.2]
  3. [Data availability]
  4. [3.3]
minor comments (4)
  1. [Introduction]
  2. [2.4.2 and Fig. 9(d)]
  3. [3.2.3]
  4. [3.3]

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central ganglia-breakup claim is directly observed and classification thresholds are not fitted inputs.

full rationale

The paper is an experimental microfluidics study whose central claim—that tertiary injection of more viscous glycerol/water mixtures enhances recovery via ganglia breakup into smaller ganglia, blobs, and droplets followed by transport—is supported by direct time-lapse imaging (Fig. 9d) and by independently measured cluster number/volume trends. The droplet/blob/ganglion taxonomy in Section 3.2.2 is a conventional classification adopted from cited external literature [24,77], not a fitted parameter; the threshold intervals are arbitrary methodological choices, but they are not used to generate a prediction from a fitted value, and no parameter is fitted to a subset of data and then renamed as a prediction. The paper contains no load-bearing self-citations: the classification and capillary-pressure analyses cite external groups (Zarikos et al., Alzahid et al.), and the power-law cluster-size distribution and capillary desaturation curve are compared against independent literature benchmarks. The hand-set, non-exhaustive classification thresholds could affect quantitative robustness of the reported trends, but this is a methodological limitation rather than circular reasoning. The core phenomenon of ganglia breakup is directly observed in the images, so the derivation chain is self-contained and not equivalent to its inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests mainly on image-derived cluster counts, which depend on hand-set classification thresholds, and on the assumption that a single 2D chip reproduces reservoir-relevant behavior. No new physical entities are introduced; the droplet/blob/ganglion terminology is adopted from prior literature.

free parameters (3)
  • Cluster classification area thresholds = 0.002 mm² and 0.004 mm² area boundaries
    Chosen by hand to separate droplets, blobs, and ganglia in Section 3.2.2; the quantitative number and volume trends depend on these boundaries.
  • Cluster classification circularity thresholds = 0.3 and 0.7 circularity boundaries
    Chosen by hand alongside the area thresholds; affects which clusters are labeled ganglia rather than blobs.
  • Geometric factor G for capillary number = 450
    Adopted from the Tang et al. capillary number definition in Eq. (1) and used for all Ca values in Table 2 and Fig. 12; it does not drive the main fragmentation mechanism but affects the reported CDC curve.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The interfacial tension between oil and water or glycerol-water mixtures is essentially constant at about 55 mN/m.
    Stated in Section 2.1 and Table 1; this assumption makes viscosity ratio the main controlled variable. If IFT varied with glycerol content, the capillary number and mobilization mechanisms would change.
  • domain assumption Behavior observed in the 2D water-wet micromodel is representative of 3D porous media behavior.
    Invoked in the Introduction and Section 3.1 via references to Hu et al. and Borji et al.; the EOR relevance of the pore-scale observations depends on this transferability.
  • domain assumption The Tang et al. capillary number definition with geometric factor G = 450 is appropriate for this specific chip.
    Used in Eq. (1) and Section 3.1 to compute all capillary numbers; the adjustable factor is not independently validated in this paper.
  • ad hoc to paper Threshold-based cluster categories correspond to physically distinct mobilization regimes.
    Section 3.2.2 defines droplets, blobs, and ganglia by area and circularity cuts; the central quantitative claim about ganglia volume reduction is tied to these definitions.
  • standard math Darcy's law is valid for measuring the absolute permeability of the chip.
    Used in Section 2.4.1 to obtain k = 2.7 Darcy from flow rate and pressure drop data; standard for single-phase flow in microchannels.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Tertiary EOR-like microfluidic experiments: influence of viscosity ratio on oil clusters mobilization." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UXI2M6VH

@misc{pith2026250102296,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Tertiary EOR-like microfluidic experiments: influence of viscosity ratio on oil clusters mobilization},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UXI2M6VH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.02296}
}
read the original abstract

Understanding the pore-scale dynamics of immiscible two-phase flow in porous media is crucial 9 for optimizing EOR strategies. In this work, we investigate the mobilization dynamics of oil clusters by 10 means of microfluidic devices that allow pore scale direct characterization of flow in water-wet chips. We varied both flow rates during waterflooding and the viscosity ratio by injecting Glycerol/water mixtures of various compositions right after the waterflooding period. During waterflooding, the flow rate has only a limited impact on residual oil. With a subsequent injection of a Glycerol/water mixture, the oil recovery is significantly enhanced. To better understand the recovery mechanisms, oil clusters were categorized into droplets, blobs and ganglia. Increasing the viscosity of the injected mixture resulted in only a slight reduction in the number of ganglia but significantly decreased their total volume, thus reducing overall oil saturation. This is due to ganglia breakup into smaller ganglia, blobs and droplets that are subsequently mobilized and transported away, while remaining parts of original ganglia still remain trapped. As long as droplets and blobs are considered, their number is seen to only weakly change by the increase of mixture viscosity and even their number may temporarily increase as they result from ganglia rupture. So, the process can be separated in two main steps: ganglia breakage that feed the medium in blobs and droplets and a second step where such moving oil entities are transported. The characteristic time for oil transport is believed to be longer than that required for ganglia breakage.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Datta, T.S

    S.S. Datta, T.S. Ramakrishnan, D.A. Weitz, Mobilization of a trapped non -wetting fluid from a three-dimensional porous medium, Phys. Fluids 26 (2014) 22002. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4866641

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4866641 2014

  2. [2]

    S. An, H. E rfani, O.E. Godinez -Brizuela, V. Niasar, Transition From Viscous Fingering to Capillary Fingering: Application of GPU-Based Fully Implicit Dynamic Pore Network Modeling, Water Resour. Res. 56 (2020) e2020WR028149. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028149

    work page doi:10.1029/2020wr028149 2020

  3. [3]

    W. Yun, S. Chang, D.A. Cogswell, S.L. Eichmann, A. Gizzatov, G. Thomas, N. Al -Hazza, A. Abdel-Fattah, W. Wang, Toward Reservoir -on-a-Chip: Rapid Performance Evaluation of Enhanced Oil Recovery Surfactants for Carbonate Reservoirs Using a Calcite -Coated Micromodel, Sci. Rep. 10 (2020) 782. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-57485-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-020-57485-x 2020

  4. [4]

    Beteta, K.S

    A. Beteta, K.S. Sorbie, K. McIver, G. Johnson, R. Gasimov, W. van Zeil, The Role of Immiscible Fingering on the Mechanism of Secondary and Tertiary Polymer Flooding of Viscous Oil, Transp. Porous Media 143 (2022) 343–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-022-01774-8

    work page doi:10.1007/s11242-022-01774-8 2022

  5. [5]

    Gauteplass, S

    J. Gauteplass, S. Almenningen, G. Ersland, T. Barth, J. Yang, A. Chapoy, Multiscale investigation of CO2 hydrate self-sealing potential for carbon geo-sequestration, Chem. Eng. J. 381 (2020) 122646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.122646

    work page arXiv 2020

  6. [6]

    B. Wei, X. Zhang, J. Liu, X. Xu, W. Pu, M. Bai, Adsorptive behaviors of supercritical CO2 in tight porous media and triggered chemical reactions with rock minerals during CO2-EOR and - sequestration, Chem. Eng. J. 381 (2020) 122577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.122577

    work page arXiv 2020

  7. [7]

    Gamal Rezk, A

    M. Gamal Rezk, A. Farid Ibrahim, A.R. Adebayo, Influence of impurities on reactive transport of CO2 during geo -sequestration in saline aquifers, Fu el 344 (2023) 127994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2023.127994

    work page arXiv 2023

  8. [8]

    Sweijen, N

    T. Sweijen, N. Hartog, A. Marsman, T.J.S. Keijzer, The transport behaviour of elemental mercury DNAPL in saturated porous media: Analysis of field observations and two -phase flow modelling, J. Contam. Hydrol. 161 (2014) 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2014.03.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jconhyd.2014.03.001 2014

Show all 83 references
  1. [9]

    Philippe, H

    N. Philippe, H. Davarzani, S. Colombano, M. Dierick, P. -Y. Klein, M. Marcoux, Experimental study of the temperature effect on two-phase flow properties in highly permeable porous media: Application to the remediation of dense non -aqueous phase liquids (DNAPLs) in polluted so...

    2020

  2. [10]

    Eigbe, O.O

    P.A. Eigbe, O.O. Ajayi, O.T. Olakoyejo, O.L. Fadipe, S. Efe, A.O. Adelaja, A general review of CO2 sequestration in underground geological formations and assessment of depleted hydrocarbon reservoirs in the Niger Delta, Appl. Energy 350 (2023) 121723. https://doi.org/https://d...

    2023

  3. [11]

    Selva Filho, A

    A.A.P. Selva Filho, A. Converti, R. de C.F. Soares da Silva, L.A. Sarubbo, Biosurfactants as Multifunctional Remediation Agents of Environmental Pollutants Generated by the Petroleum Industry, Energies 16 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/en16031209

    2023 doi

  4. [12]

    Andrew, B

    M. Andrew, B. Bijeljic, M.J. Blunt, Pore -by-pore capillary pressure measurements using X -ray microtomography at reservoir conditions: Curvature, snap -off, and remobilization of residual CO2, Water Resour. Res. 50 (2014) 8760–8774. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015970

    2014 doi

  5. [13]

    R. Aziz, V. Joekar-Niasar, P.J. Martínez-Ferrer, O.E. Godinez-Brizuela, C. Theodoropoulos, H. Mahani, Novel insights into pore -scale dynamics of wettability alteration during low salinity waterflooding, Sci. Rep. 9 (2019) 9257. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45434-2

    2019 doi

  6. [14]

    A. Bera, T. Kumar, K. Ojha, A. Mandal, Adsorption of surfactants on sand surface in enhanced oil recovery: Isotherms, kinetics and thermodynamic studies, Appl. Surf. Sci. 284 (2013) 87–99. 26 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.07.029

    2013 doi

  7. [15]

    X. Deng, Z. Tariq, M. Murtaza, S. Patil, M. Mahmoud, M.S. Kamal, Relative contribution of wettability Alteration and interfacial tension reduction in EOR: A critical review, J. Mol. Liq. 325 (2021) 115175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2020.115175

    2021

  8. [16]

    K. Guo, H. Li, Z. Yu, In -situ heavy and extra -heavy oil recovery: A review, Fuel 185 (2016) 886–902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.08.047

    2016 doi

  9. [17]

    Hascakir, Introduction to thermal Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) spe cial issue, J

    B. Hascakir, Introduction to thermal Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) spe cial issue, J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 154 (2017) 438–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2017.05.026

    2017 doi

  10. [18]

    Kamal, I.A

    M.S. Kamal, I.A. Hussein, A.S. Sultan, Review on surfactant flooding: phase behavior, retention, IFT, and field applications, Energy & Fuels 31 (2017) 7701 –7720. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b00353

    2017 doi

  11. [19]

    Reed, R.N

    R.L. Reed, R.N. Healy, D.O. Shah, R.S. Schechter, Some physicochemical aspects of microemulsion flooding: a review, Improv. Oil Recover. by Surfactant Polym. Flooding (1977) 383–437

    1977

  12. [20]

    Tavakkoli, H

    O. Tavakkoli, H. Kamyab, M. Shariati, A.M. Mohamed, R. Junin, Effect of nanoparticles on the performance of polymer/surfactant flooding for enhanced oil recovery: A review, Fuel 312 (2022) 122867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122867

    2022

  13. [21]

    W.-L. Kang, B. -B. Zhou, M. Issakhov, M. Gabdullin, Advances in enhanced oil recovery technologies for low permeability reservoirs, Pet. Sci. 19 (2022) 1622 –1640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petsci.2022.06.010

    2022 doi

  14. [22]

    Pini, S.M

    R. Pini, S.M. Benson, Simultaneous determination of capillary pressure and relative permeability curves from core-flooding experiments with various fluid pairs, Water Resour. Res. 49 (2013) 3516–3530. https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20274

    2013 doi

  15. [23]

    Shaker Shiran, A

    B. Shaker Shiran, A. Skauge, Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) by Combined Low S alinity Water/Polymer Flooding, Energy & Fuels 27 (2013) 1223 –1235. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef301538e

    2013 doi

  16. [24]

    Zarikos, A

    I. Zarikos, A. Terzis, S.M. Hassanizadeh, B. Weigand, Velocity distributions in trapped and mobilized non -wetting phase ganglia in porous media, Sci . Rep. 8 (2018) 13228. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31639-4

    2018 doi

  17. [25]

    Jahanbakhsh, K.L

    A. Jahanbakhsh, K.L. Wlodarczyk, D.P. Hand, R.R.J. Maier, M.M. Maroto -Valer, Review of Microfluidic Devices and Imaging Techniques for Fluid Flow Study in Porous Geomaterials, Sensors 20 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/s20144030

    2020 doi

  18. [26]

    Gogoi, S.B

    S. Gogoi, S.B. Gogoi, Review on microfluidic studies for EOR application, J. Pet. Explor. Prod. Technol. 9 (2019) 2263–2277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-019-0610-4

    2019 doi

  19. [27]

    Anastasiou, I

    A. Anastasiou, I. Zarikos, A. Yiotis, L. Talon, D. Salin, Steady -State Dynamics of Ganglia Populations During Immiscible Two -Phase Flows in Porous Micromodels: Effects of the Capillary Number and Flow Ratio on Effective Rheology and Size Distributions, Transp. Porous Media 1...

    2024 doi

  20. [28]

    Chang, J.-P

    L.-C. Chang, J.-P. Tsai, H.-Y. Shan, H.-H. Chen, Experimental study on imbibition displacement mechanisms of two -phase fluid using micro model, Environ. Earth Sci. 59 (2009) 901 –911. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-009-0085-6

    2009 doi

  21. [29]

    F. Yu, H. Jiang, F. Xu, Z. Fan, H. Su, J. Li, New insights into flow physics in the EOR process based on 2.5 D reservoir micromodels, J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 181 (2019) 106214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106214

    2019

  22. [30]

    Zhang, M

    C. Zhang, M. Oostrom, T.W. Wietsma, J.W. Grate, M.G. Warner, Influence of viscous and 27 capillary forces on immiscible fluid displacement: Pore-scale experimental study in a water-wet micromodel demonstrating viscous and capillary fingering, Energy & Fuels 25 (2011) 3493–

    2011

  23. [31]

    Yiotis, N.K

    A. Yiotis, N.K. Karadimitriou, I. Zarikos, H. Steeb, Pore-scale effects during the transition from capillary- to viscosity-dominated flow dynamics within microfluidic porous -like domains, Sci. Rep. 11 (2021) 3891. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83065-8

    2021 doi

  24. [32]

    W. Lei, T. Liu, C. Xie, H. Yang, T. Wu, M. Wang, Enhanced oil recovery mechanism and recovery performance of micro‐gel particle suspensions by microfluidic experiments, Energy Sci. Eng. 8 (2020) 986–998. https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.563

    2020 doi

  25. [33]

    Ouyang, J.S

    Q. Ouyang, J.S. Pandey, N. von Solms, Microfluidic insights: Methane hydrate dynamics in distinct wettable confined space, Chem. Eng. J. 474 (2023) 145567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.145567

    2023

  26. [34]

    Saffman, G.I

    P.G. Saffman, G.I. Taylor, The penetration of a fluid into a porous medium or Hele -Shaw cell containing a more viscous liquid, Proc. R. Soc. London. Ser. A. Math. Phys. Sci. 245 (1958) 312–329. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1958.0085

    1958

  27. [35]

    Lenormand, E

    R. Lenormand, E. Touboul, C. Zarcone, Numerical models and experiments on immiscible displacements in porous media, J. Fluid Mech. 189 (1988) 165 –187. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112088000953

    1988 doi

  28. [36]

    Armstrong, N

    R.T. Armstrong, N. Evseev, D. Koroteev, S. Berg, Modeling the velocity fie ld during Haines jumps in porous media, Adv. Water Resour. 77 (2015) 57 –68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.01.008

    2015 doi

  29. [37]

    Y. Chen, S. Fang, D. Wu, R. Hu, Visualizing and quantifying the crossover from capillary fingering to viscous fingering in a rough fracture, Water Resour. Res. 53 (2017) 7756 –7772. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR021051

    2017 doi

  30. [38]

    Y. Hu, A. Patmonoaji, C. Zhang, T. Suekane, Experimental study on the displacement patterns and the phase diagram of immiscible fluid displacement in three-dimensional porous media, Adv. Water Resour. 140 (2020) 103584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2020.103584

    2020

  31. [39]

    Singh, H

    K. Singh, H. Menke, M. Andrew, Q. Lin, C. Rau, M.J. Blunt, B. Bijeljic, Dynamics of snap -off and pore-filling events during two-phase fluid flow in permeable media, Sci. Rep. 7 (2017) 5192. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05204-4

    2017 doi

  32. [40]

    Akhlaghi Amiri, A.A

    H.A. Akhlaghi Amiri, A.A. Hamouda, Pore-scale modeling of non-isothermal two phase flow in 2D porous media: Influences of viscosity, capillar ity, wettability and heterogeneity, Int. J. Multiph. Flow 61 (2014) 14 –27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow....

    2014 doi

  33. [41]

    Z. Yang, Y. Méheust, I. Neuweiler, R. Hu, A. Niemi, Y. -F. Chen, Modeling Immiscible Two - Phase Flow in Ro ugh Fractures From Capillary to Viscous Fingering, Water Resour. Res. 55 (2019) 2033–2056. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR024045

    2019 doi

  34. [43]

    J. Tang, M. Smit, S. Vincent -Bonnieu, W.R. Rossen, New Capillary Number Definition for Micromodels: The Impact of Pore Microstructure, Water Resour. Res. 55 (2019) 11 67–1178. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023429

    2019 doi

  35. [44]

    R. Li, Z. Gu, Z. Li, W. Lu, G. Zhao, J. Su, Behaviors of non -wetting phase snap-off events in two-phase flow: microscopic phenomena and macroscopic effects, Microfluid. Nanofluidics 28 (2024) 24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-024-02718-y. 28

    2024 doi

  36. [45]

    Kalita, V

    P. Kalita, V. Sharma, L. Pandey, P. Tiwari, Secondary and Tertiary Oil Recovery Processes BT - Microbial Enhanced Oil Recovery: Principles and Potential, in: L. Pandey, P. Tiwari (Eds.), Springer Singapore, Singapore, 2022: pp. 23–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5465-7_2

    2022 doi

  37. [46]

    Youssef, D

    S. Youssef, D. Bauer, Y. Peysson, O. Vizika, Investigation of Pore Structure Impact on the Mobilization of Trapped Oil by Surfactant Injection, SCA2014-064 (2014)

    2014

  38. [47]

    Veerabhadrappa, A

    S.K. Veerabhadrappa, A. Doda, J.J. Trivedi, E. Kuru, On the Effect of Polymer Elasticity on Secondary and Tertiary Oil Recovery, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 52 (2013) 18421 –18428. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie4026456

    2013 doi

  39. [48]

    Taber, Dynamic and Static Forces Required To Remove a Discontinuous Oil Phase from Porous Media Containing Both Oil and Water, Soc

    J.J. Taber, Dynamic and Static Forces Required To Remove a Discontinuous Oil Phase from Porous Media Containing Both Oil and Water, Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 9 (1969) 3 –12. https://doi.org/10.2118/2098-PA

    1969 doi

  40. [49]

    Chatzis, N.R

    I. Chatzis, N.R. Morrow, H.T. Lim, Magnitude and Detailed Structure of Residual Oil Saturation, Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 23 (1983) 311–326. https://doi.org/10.2118/10681-PA

    1983 doi

  41. [50]

    Morrow, I

    N.R. Morrow, I. Chatzis, J.J. Taber, Entrapment and Mobilization of Residual Oil in Bead Packs, SPE Reserv. Eng. 3 (1988) 927–934. https://doi.org/10.2118/14423-PA

    1988 doi

  42. [51]

    Payatakes, K.M

    A.C. Payatakes, K.M. Ng, R .W. Flumerfelt, Oil ganglion dynamics during immiscible displacement: Model formulation, AIChE J. 26 (1980) 430 –443. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690260315

    1980 doi

  43. [52]

    Zhong, A

    L. Zhong, A. Mayer, R.J. Glass, Visualization of surfactant -enhanced nonaqueous phase liquid mobilization and solubilization in a two-dimensional micromodel, Water Resour. Res. 37 (2001) 523–537. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000WR900300

    2001 doi

  44. [53]

    Kurniawan, M

    T. Kurniawan, M. Sahebdivani, D. Zaremba, S. Blonski, P. Garstecki, V. van Steijn, P.M. Korczyk, Formation of droplets in microfluidic cross -junctions at small capillary numbers: Breakdown of the classical squeezing regime, Chem. Eng. J. 474 (2023) 145601. https://doi.org/10....

    2023

  45. [54]

    B. Kaya, U. Ceyhan, Axisymmetric deformation of drops through tubes with symmetric and asymmetric constrictions, Meccanica 58 (2023) 1291 –1306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012 - 023-01666-1

    2023 doi

  46. [55]

    Larson, H.T

    R.G. Larson, H.T. Davis, L.E. Scriven, Displacement of residual nonwetting fluid from porous media, Chem. Eng. Sci. 36 (1981) 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(81)80049-8

    1981 doi

  47. [56]

    K.M. Ng, H.T. Davis, L.E. Scriven, Visualization of blob mechanics in flow through porous media, Chem. Eng. Sci. 33 (1978) 1009–1017. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(78)85004-0

    1978 doi

  48. [57]

    Amili, Y.C

    P. Amili, Y.C. Yortsos, Darcian Dynamics: A New Approach to the Mobilization of a Trapped Phase in Porous Media, Transp. Porous Media 64 (2006) 25–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242- 005-1397-y

    2006 doi

  49. [58]

    Schnaar, M.L

    G. Schnaar, M.L. Brusseau, Characterizing pore-scale configuration of organic immiscible liquid in multiphase systems with synchrotron X -ray microtomography, Vadose Zo. J. 5 (2006) 641 –

    2006

  50. [59]

    Georgiadis, S

    A. Georgiadis, S. Berg, A. Makurat, G. Maitland, H. Ott, Pore -scale micro -computed- tomography imaging: Nonwetting-phase cluster-size distribution during drainage and imbibition, Phys. Rev. E —Statistical, Nonlinear, Soft Matter Phys. 88 (2013) 33002. https://doi.org/10.1103...

    2013 doi

  51. [60]

    Herring, E.J

    A.L. Herring, E.J. Harper, L. Andersson, A. Sheppard, B.K. Bay, D. Wildenschild, Effect of fluid topology on residual nonwetting phase trapping: Implications for geologic CO2 sequestration, Adv. Water Resour. 62 (2013) 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2013.09.015. 29

    2013 doi

  52. [61]

    Jiang, T

    F. Jiang, T. Tsuji, Nume rical investigations on the effect of initial state CO2 topology on capillary trapping efficiency, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 49 (2016) 179 –191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.03.006

    2016 doi

  53. [62]

    Mayer, C.T

    A.S. Mayer, C.T. Miller, An experimental investigation of po re-scale distributions of nonaqueous phase liquids at residual saturation, Transp. Porous Media 10 (1993) 57 –80. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00617511

    1993 doi

  54. [63]

    Morrow, Interplay of capillary, viscous and buoyancy forces in the mobilization of residual oil, J

    N.R. Morrow, Interplay of capillary, viscous and buoyancy forces in the mobilization of residual oil, J. Can. Pet. Technol. 18 (1979). https://doi.org/10.2118/79-03-03

    1979 doi

  55. [64]

    Melrose, C.F

    J.C. Melrose, C.F. Brandner, Role of capillary forces in determining microscopic displacement efficiency for oil recovery by waterflooding, Prepr. Annu. Can. Inst. Min. Metall. Pet. Soc. Tech. Mtg.;(Canada) 374013 (1974)

    1974

  56. [65]

    Ramstad, A

    T. Ramstad, A. Hansen, Cluster evolution in steady-state two-phase flow in porous media, Phys. Rev. E 73 (2006) 26306. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.73.026306

    2006 doi

  57. [66]

    Zinchenko, R.H

    A.Z. Zinchenko, R.H. Davis, Emulsion flow thr ough a packed bed with multiple drop breakup, J. Fluid Mech. 725 (2013) 611–663. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2013.197

    2013 doi

  58. [67]

    Borji, A

    M. Borji, A. Kharrat, H. Ott, EOR Displacement Characteristics from Cluster Analysis and Fractional Pore Occupation, Transp. Po rous Media 150 (2023) 447 –464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-023-02018-z

    2023 doi

  59. [68]

    Khasi, A

    S. Khasi, A. Fayazi, A. Kantzas, Break -up and mobilization of DNAPL by acoustic excitation: Experimental evidence and pore network modeling, Chemosphere 325 (2023) 138345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.138345

    2023

  60. [69]

    Gostick, Z.A

    J.T. Gostick, Z.A. Khan, T.G. Tranter, M.D.R. Kok, M. Agnaou, M. Sadeghi, R. Jervis, PoreSpy: A python toolkit for quantitative analysis of porous media images, J. Open Source Softw. 4 (2019) 1296

    2019

  61. [70]

    Gostick, Versatile and efficient pore network extraction method using marker -based watershed segmentation, Phys

    J.T. Gostick, Versatile and efficient pore network extraction method using marker -based watershed segmentation, Phys. Rev. E 96 (2017) 23307. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.96.023307

    2017 doi

  62. [71]

    Kern, Evolution of silicon wafer cleaning technology, Proc

    W. Kern, Evolution of silicon wafer cleaning technology, Proc. - Electrochem. Soc. 90 (1990) 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2086825

    1990 doi

  63. [72]

    V Ryazanov, K.S

    A. V Ryazanov, K.S. Sorbie, M.I.J. Van Dijke, Structure of residual oil as a function of wettability using pore -network modelling, Adv. Water Resour. 63 (2014) 11 –21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2013.09.012

    2014 doi

  64. [73]

    Abdallah, J.S

    W. Abdallah, J.S. Buckley, A. Carnegie, J. Edwards, B. Herold, E. Fordham, A. Graue, T. Habashy, N. Seleznev, C. Signer, Fundamentals of wettability, Technology 38 (1986) 268

    1986

  65. [74]

    Alzahid, P

    Y.A. Alzahid, P. Mostaghimi, A. Geram i, A. Singh, K. Privat, T. Amirian, R.T. Armstrong, Functionalisation of Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) - Microfluidic Devices coated with Rock Minerals, Sci. Rep. 8 (2018) 15518. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33495-8

    2018 doi

  66. [75]

    J. Zhao, G. Yao, D. Wen, Pore-scale simulation of water/oil displacement in a water-wet channel, Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. 13 (2019) 803–814. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-019-1835-y

    2019 doi

  67. [76]

    Haney, T

    B. Haney, T. Cochard, A. Julien, J. Wu, R. Davis, L. Xiao, D.A. Weitz, Y.-Q. Song, Oil Ganglia Mobility Enhancement by Droplet Formation for Surfactant Flooding in Porous Media, Transp. Porous Media 151 (2024) 585–597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-023-02050-z

    2024 doi

  68. [77]

    Y. Yang, H. Yang, L. Tao, J. Yao, W. Wang, K. Zhang, L. Luquot, Microscopic Determinatio n of Remaining Oil Distribution in Sandstones With Different Permeability Scales Using Computed Tomography Scanning, J. Energy Resour. Technol. 141 (2019). 30 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4043131

    2019 doi

  69. [78]

    Talon, R

    L. Talon, R. Bouguemari, A. Yiotis, D. Salin, Fragmentation and coalescence dynamics of non- wetting blobs during immiscible two -phase flows in porous media, Phys. Rev. Fluids 8 (2023) 93602. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.8.093602

    2023 doi

  70. [79]

    Rodríguez de Castro, M

    A. Rodríguez de Castro, M. Oostrom, N. Shokri, Effects of shear-thinning fluids on residual oil formation in microfluidic pore networks, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 472 (2016) 34 –43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2016.03.027

    2016 doi

  71. [80]

    D Wilkinson, J F Willemsen, Invasion percolation: a new form of percolation theory, J. Phys. A. Math. Gen. 16 (1983) 3365. https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/16/14/028

    1983 doi

  72. [81]

    Iglauer, W

    S. Iglauer, W. Wülling, The scaling exponent of residual nonwetting phase cluster size distributions in porous media, Geophys. Res. Lett. 43 (2016) 11,211 -253,260. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071298

    2016 doi

  73. [82]

    Nilsson, R

    M.A. Nilsson, R. Kulkarni, L. Gerberich, R. Hammond, R. Singh, E. Baumhoff, J.P. Rothstein, Effect of fluid rheology on enhanced oil recovery in a microfluidic sandstone device, J. Nonnewton. Fluid Mech. 202 (2013) 112–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnnfm.2013.09.011

    2013 doi

  74. [648]

    https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2005.0063

  75. [3505]

    https://doi.org/10.1021/ef101732k

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.