Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 74 references

Reconfigurable Non-Hermitian Soliton Combs using Dissipative Couplings and Topological Windings

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper shows that direction-dependent lossy couplings let the same ring-resonator array generate nested soliton combs with nine, five, or one supermode per FSR, tunable in spacing from 0.59 J to 1.32 J by changing a hopping phase.

desk verdict The comb simulations are carefully done, but the proposed passive bus waveguide cannot produce the direction-dependent loss the whole scheme depends on. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.00127 v1 pith:UY7NUO6L submitted 2025-05-30 physics.optics nlin.PS

Seyed Danial Hashemi , Sunil Mittal This is my paper
classification physics.opticsnlin.PS PACS 42.65.Tg42.60.Da
keywords dissipativeKerrsolitonsnon-Hermitianphotonicsopticalfrequencycombsnestedtopologicalwindingsnonreciprocalcouplingcoupledringresonatorsreconfigurable
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Dissipative Kerr solitons, the pulses behind chip-scale optical frequency combs, normally live in a single resonator whose geometry fixes the comb's line spacing. This paper claims that a ring-resonator array with deliberately nonreciprocal, lossy couplings makes the comb reconfigurable after fabrication: by tuning the phase of the light's hops between rings, the same array switches between generating nine, five, or one supermode per free-spectral range, changing the comb spacing from 0.59 J to 1.32 J. The loss is not a nuisance to be minimized but the design knob: it imprints a topological winding on the supermode complex energies, and only the low-loss supermodes that also satisfy energy conservation participate in the soliton comb. If correct, this turns dissipation engineering into a general tool for soliton-comb design and opens a route to on-demand RF repetition-rate tuning from a fixed chip.

What carries the argument

The central object is the non-Hermitian coupling element: a link ring between site rings, with an external waveguide attached to introduce a scalar transmission loss t_NH < 1 for photons hopping in one direction, making the effective hopping amplitude nonreciprocal (J $e^{{-δ}}$ for backward hops). Combined with a hopping phase φ from shifting the link-ring length, this creates a synthetic magnetic field acting on both the real and imaginary parts of the energy. The paper's main analytic tool is the complex energy spectrum E(k) = Re E + i Im E: the topological winding traced out as Bloch momentum k sweeps over the Brillouin zone encodes which supermodes are simultaneously low-loss and appropriately spaced for four-wave-mixing energy conservation. The paper argues this winding picture, not the absorption spectrum alone, predicts the comb structure, and it uses the transfer-matrix-based Ikeda map for time-domain simulations because the effective-Hamiltonian/Lugiato-Lefever route introduces spurious gain for passive non-Hermitian systems.

What would settle it

Build the proposed array and measure the linear absorption spectrum and comb output while thermally tuning φ_NN: if the count of oscillating supermodes per FSR and their spacing do not switch between about nine (0.59 J), five (1.32 J), and one as predicted, or if the bare link-ring coupler shows backscatter, gain, or nonlinear loss at operating power, the central claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that non-Hermitian dissipative couplings can be used as a positive design resource for dissipative Kerr solitons. In a one-dimensional super-ring of ring resonators, link rings with an attached loss waveguide introduce direction-dependent hopping amplitudes (nonreciprocal couplings), while link-ring length offsets introduce hopping phases. The resulting complex eigenvalues form closed loop windings in the two-dimensional complex energy plane, and these windings jointly set the supermode dispersion (real parts) and dissipation (imaginary parts). The authors show numerically, using an Ikeda map that avoids the spurious gain of single-mode approximations, that pumping one low-loss supermode yields phase-locked nested solitons and coherent nested combs whose oscillating supermodes are exactly the low-dissipation, energy-conserving set selected by the winding. Tuning the hopping phase φ_NN rotates the winding loops and thereby reconfigures the comb: with nearest-neighbor couplings only, nine supermodes oscillate per FSR at spacing 0.59 J; adding next-nearest-neighbor couplings with φ_NN = 0.50625(2π) gives five supermodes at 1.32 J; and φ_NN = 0.41667(2π) gives one supermode per FSR, a soliton-molecule state equivalent in output to a single ring but formed by 20 synchronized rings.

Load-bearing premise

The engineered lossy coupler behaves exactly as a fixed, direction-dependent amplitude loss with no gain, backscatter, extra phase noise, or power-dependent effects, even at the multi-watt pump levels the design requires.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The same fabricated array can generate combs with very different line spacings and line counts by thermally tuning hopping phases, something single-resonator Kerr combs cannot do because their spacing is fixed by the free spectral range.
  • Non-Hermitian dissipation suppresses nonlinearity-induced mixing between counter-propagating supermodes, enabling stable soliton combs in arrays that, in the Hermitian case, do not support them.
  • The winding picture provides a design rule: choose hopping strengths, phases, and dissipation levels so that the low-loss supermodes are equally spaced in frequency, thereby setting the number and spacing of comb lines.
  • Nested comb states with two widely different frequency scales (single-ring FSR and super-ring round-trip) arise naturally, and the slow scale Ω_SR is directly controlled by the hopping phase.
  • The approach is stated to generalize to other comb platforms (electro-optic, optomechanical) and to 2D arrays where higher-order non-Hermitian topology can be exploited.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the phase-tuned spacing carries over to hardware, a single chip could act as a tunable repetition-rate source for RF signal synthesis, where tuning φ_NN would tune the microwave tone without changing the pump or the device—a capability the paper mentions only as a possible application.
  • The ~20 W pump power estimated for next-nearest-neighbor devices is well above telecom-compatible on-chip levels; the paper notes that lowering J or optimizing input-output coupling could reduce it, but a concrete path to sub-watt operation is not shown—this is the main practical uncertainty an experimental follow-up would need to resolve.
  • The single-supermode soliton-molecule state produces a comb identical to a single ring but distributed over 20 synchronized rings; this suggests a testable prediction that such a state could have different noise or power-handling properties than a single-ring comb, since the circulating energy is spread over many rings.
  • The winding-rotation mechanism suggests a broader principle: any non-Hermitian parameter that rotates or deforms the complex-energy winding (not just hopping phase) could serve as a reconfiguration knob, e.g., electro-optic phase modulation or nonlinearity-tuned dissipation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a theoretical framework for generating reconfigurable Kerr soliton combs in a one-dimensional ring-resonator array with non-Hermitian dissipative couplings. The authors model the array using transfer-matrix and Ikeda-map simulations, showing that nonreciprocal couplings produce topological windings in the complex energy plane, selectively dissipate certain supermodes, and enable nested soliton combs. They report three regimes: combs with nine, five, and one oscillating supermodes per free spectral range, with the comb spacing changing from 0.59J to 1.32J as a next-nearest-neighbor hopping phase is tuned. The central claim is that simultaneous dissipation and dispersion engineering through nonreciprocal couplings allows post-fabrication reconfigurability of the comb spectrum in a single device.

Significance. If the physical mechanism is realizable, the demonstrated reconfigurability of soliton combs would be a noteworthy addition to frequency-comb engineering, as conventional single-resonator combs have a fixed line spacing. The use of the Ikeda map rather than a single-mode effective Hamiltonian is appropriate and avoids spurious gain terms, and the straight-comb-line diagnostic in Fig. 2h is a clean indicator of soliton behavior. However, the entire proposal hinges on a passive element producing nonreciprocal hopping, which is not physically grounded as presented. The conceptual idea of using engineered dissipation to control soliton dynamics is interesting, but the current implementation cannot support the central claim without revision.

major comments (3)
  1. [Fig. 1a, Eq. S5, Eq. S7] The central mechanism is the direction-dependent loss that produces asymmetric couplings J e^{-δ} in Eq. S7. The only implementation described is a passive external waveguide coupled to the link ring (Fig. 1a, Eq. S5). In a linear, passive, time-invariant optical network, Lorentz reciprocity requires the scattering matrix to be symmetric, so the transmission between two site rings through a link ring is identical in opposite directions. The attenuation t_NH in Eq. S5 is a scalar applied to the link-ring field and cannot distinguish propagation directions. Therefore the asymmetric coupling amplitudes defining the non-Hermitian Hamiltonian are not realized by the proposed structure. This is a load-bearing issue: without nonreciprocal loss, the selective dissipation of supermodes that the authors claim enables the combs would not occur. The authors need either to specify a concrete mechanism that breaks Lorentz reciprocity (e.g., magneto-optical, optomechanical, or time-modulated elements) or to reframe the work as a model study with an open implementation problem; the current text does not do so.
  2. [Fig. 2g,h and 'number of oscillating modes' paragraph] The statement that the number of oscillating modes is 'dictated by' the topological winding is established post hoc: the low-loss set of nine (or five, or one) modes is identified from the absorption spectrum after the Ikeda-map simulation has shown which modes actually oscillate. No predictive rule is given that maps a winding or absorption spectrum to a mode count before running the nonlinear simulation. This weakens the engineering claim, since the authors could, in principle, have identified any low-loss subset. The authors should either derive a selection criterion from the linear spectrum (e.g., the number of modes with loss below a threshold and with approximately equal frequency spacing, predicted and then confirmed) or explicitly describe the mode count as a simulation outcome and present the linear analysis only as a diagnostic.
  3. [Introduction, statement on Hermitian arrays] The Introduction claims that in the absence of non-Hermitian engineering the array will not support stable solitons because of undesired nonlinearity-induced mixing between supermodes. The paper never simulates the Hermitian lattice under the same pump conditions. Fig. 2b shows the linear absorption for Hermitian and non-Hermitian cases, but no nonlinear comb generation for the Hermitian case is presented. Without a Hermitian baseline, the causal claim that the non-Hermitian couplings are responsible for the observed solitons is unsupported. A comparative Ikeda-map simulation of the Hermitian array, or a clear explanation of why such a simulation is not meaningful, is needed.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Supplementary, Eq. S5] The notation in Eq. S5 uses E^m_r on both sides of the equation, which is only meaningful if the field is understood to be evaluated before and after the dissipative region; this should be clarified in the text.
  2. [Results, Fig. 2 caption] In Fig. 2c and similar panels, the pump power curves are plotted against a normalized frequency, but the axis labels are not fully self-explanatory; adding the definition of δω_p in the caption would improve readability.
  3. [Discussion] The pump power estimate of ~20 W for the next-nearest-neighbor devices is far above typical microresonator soliton thresholds; a comment on thermal or free-carrier effects that might arise at such powers, even if only to say they were neglected, would be useful.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the comb spectra are emergent outputs of an Ikeda-map simulation, not defined into existence by the linear eigenvalue analysis used to interpret them.

full rationale

The central results are obtained by numerically integrating the Ikeda map (Eqs. S1–S6), with non-Hermitian hopping introduced as a model parameter e^{−δ} (Eq. S7). The comb spectra in Figs. 2–4 are emergent: the number of lines and the spacing Ω_SR are outputs of the nonlinear simulation, not inputs. The statement that the number of oscillating modes is 'dictated by' the winding identifies low-loss modes from the linear spectrum after the fact; it does not insert those modes into the model, and the nonlinear simulation can disagree, as the chaotic comb in Fig. S5 demonstrates. Pump amplitudes and detunings are scanned, but the paper does not claim they are derived from the linear theory; it claims the states exist at those parameters. Self-citations (refs. 19, 22, 48, 56) provide background concepts and standard link-ring techniques, but the load-bearing derivation is the self-contained Ikeda-map simulation. The unsupported assertion that a passive external waveguide produces nonreciprocal loss is a physical-correctness concern (Lorentz reciprocity), not a circularity, because it does not reduce the derivation to its inputs. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no load-bearing claim depends on an unverified self-citation.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities: the dissipative couplings are assembled from known components (link rings and external lossy waveguides), and the topological windings are a known non-Hermitian diagnostic. The honest cost of the proposal is carried by free parameters: every demonstrated comb state requires a hand-picked pump amplitude and detuning, plus hand-chosen hopping phases and loss contrasts. The cleanest assumption in the ledger is also the most fragile: an ideal scalar transmission for the dissipative coupling (Eq. S5) that ignores how nonreciprocal loss is implemented physically.

free parameters (4)
  • Pump field amplitude E_in = 0.021 (Fig. 2); 0.11 (Figs. 3, 4)
    Operating points found by scanning comb power versus detuning; the demonstrated comb states exist only at these hand-picked amplitudes, so reconfigurability includes re-optimizing the pump.
  • Pump detuning δω_p = -0.10005 J (Fig. 2); 0.11 J (Fig. 3); 0.72 J (Fig. 4)
    Selected at peaks of the comb-power scans in Figs. 2c, 3c, 4c; each phase configuration needs a different detuning to reach the soliton state.
  • Hopping phase φ_NN = 0.50625(2π), 0.41667(2π), 0.3(2π), 0.25(2π)
    Hand-chosen values of the tuning knob used to demonstrate different winding geometries and comb states; they are demonstration choices, not derived from a target comb specification.
  • Dissipative coupling transmissions t_NH_N, t_NH_NN = 0.95, 0.9
    Hand-picked loss contrasts that break the CW/CCW degeneracy in the imaginary eigenvalues; the number of oscillating supermodes depends on these values.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Ikeda map with the coupled-mode equations (Eqs. S1-S3) faithfully captures the comb dynamics of the array
    Standard microcomb simulation framework (Ikeda 1979; Hansson and Wabnitz); the paper argues LLE is unsuitable here because the single-mode approximation introduces spurious gain (Supp. II).
  • domain assumption Kerr nonlinearity resides only in the site rings; link rings are linear, lossy elements
    Eq. S3 applies the nonlinear term only inside each ring; at 0.8-20 W circulating powers, thermal or Kerr effects in the link rings could alter the comb states, and this is not modeled.
  • domain assumption The ring resonators have anomalous dispersion D2 = 5e-6 Ω_R
    Standard assumption for bright DKS combs; with Ω_R/2π = 250 GHz this corresponds to D2/2π = 1.25 MHz, a reasonable silicon-nitride value.
  • ad hoc to paper A passive waveguide coupled to the link ring produces pure direction-dependent loss (Eq. S5) with no gain or mode mixing
    Central to the non-Hermitian design; the paper asserts the linear system is passive, but no experimental demonstration of this exact lossy nonreciprocal coupler in a static ring array is provided or cited.
  • domain assumption The periodic super-ring with N = 20 site rings is well described by the infinite-lattice winding picture plus a transfer-matrix treatment of the input-output defect
    Complex-plane windings are computed for Bloch momentum k of the periodic lattice, while the comb is generated in the finite 20-ring array with an input-output waveguide.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Reconfigurable Non-Hermitian Soliton Combs using Dissipative Couplings and Topological Windings." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UY7NUO6L

@misc{pith2026250600127,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Reconfigurable Non-Hermitian Soliton Combs using Dissipative Couplings and Topological Windings},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UY7NUO6L}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.00127}
}
read the original abstract

The emergence of dissipative Kerr solitons (DKS) in nonlinear resonators has revolutionized the generation of on-chip coherent optical frequency combs. The formation of DKS in conventional single resonators hinges on balancing the resonator dissipation against the parametric gain and balancing the resonator dispersion against the resonance frequency shifts introduced by the Kerr nonlinearity. Here, we theoretically introduce a new class of non-Hermitian soliton combs that are enabled by engineering the dissipation and dispersion of a coupled resonator array with nonreciprocal couplings. We show that these non-Hermitian soliton combs allow unprecedented post-fabrication agile reconfigurability of the soliton comb spectrum, where the number of comb lines, as well as their frequency spacing, can be drastically tuned by simply tuning the hopping phases between resonators. Such reconfigurable non-Hermitian combs generated using coupled resonator arrays could enable new functionalities for a multitude of comb applications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.00127 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    As shown in Fig.3a, this system exhibits a non-Hermitian topology with double winding

    50625(2π ). As shown in Fig.3a, this system exhibits a non-Hermitian topology with double winding. The absorp- tion spectrum for this system is shown in Fig.3b, and is com- pared to that of a Hermitian system. We note that because of next-nearest-neighbor couplings, the range of real eigenval- ues ∼ (−2. 5J, 4J) is much larger compared to the super-ring w...

    work page

  2. [2]

    72J and pump field Ein = 0. 11, we now observe the oscil- 6 1 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 1 0 e e Iterations ( / ) e 0 127 -128 -30 -80 ig h g h g -4 -2 2 4 50 Comb Power (dB) -40 -60 -128 127 0 Comb Power (dB) -50 -30 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 Comb Power 1 0 -4 0 5 0 -25 Absorption (dB) 1 0 Pump a b c d h h -0.3 0 Re(E) 4 -3 0 Im(E) 0.2 0.11 = 76 -45 NH H f 51 ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    95, t N H N N = 0

    41667(2π ), J N = JN N = J, t N H N = 0 . 95, t N H N N = 0 . 9. a. Schematic of the array and the resultant double winding. The blue shaded dot on the winding curve indicates the pumped mode. b. Linear absorption spectrum of the array. The frequency spacings between neighboring supermodes with low dissipation are very different, which prevents the oscill...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Cundiff, S. T. & Y e, J. Colloquium: Femtosecond optical fre- quency combs. Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 325–342 (2003)

    work page 2003

  5. [5]

    J., Holzwarth, R

    Kippenberg, T. J., Holzwarth, R. & Diddams, S. A. Microresonator-based optical frequency combs. Science 332, 555–559 (2011)

    2011

  6. [6]

    J., Gaeta, A

    Kippenberg, T. J., Gaeta, A. L., Lipson, M. & Gorodetsky, M. L. Dissipative kerr solitons in optical microresonators. Sci- ence 361 (2018)

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    Pasquazi, A. et al. Micro-combs: A novel generation of optical sources. Phys. Rep. 729, 1–81 (2018). 8

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    L., Lipson, M

    Gaeta, A. L., Lipson, M. & Kippenberg, T. J. Photonic-chip- based frequency combs. Nat. Photonics 13, 158–169 (2019)

    work page 2019

Show all 74 references
  1. [9]

    Anderson, M. H. et al. Zero dispersion kerr solitons in optical microresonators. Nat. Commun. 13, 4764 (2022)

    2022

  2. [10]

    Spontaneous pulse formation in edgeless pho- tonic crystal resonators

    Y u, S.-P .et al. Spontaneous pulse formation in edgeless pho- tonic crystal resonators. Nat. Photonics 15, 461–467 (2021)

    2021

  3. [11]

    & Papp, S

    Y u, S.-P ., Lucas, E., Zang, J. & Papp, S. B. A continuum of bright and dark-pulse states in a photonic-crystal resonator. Nat. Commun. 13, 3134 (2022)

    2022

  4. [12]

    C., Carlson, D

    Lucas, E., Y u, S.-P ., Briles, T. C., Carlson, D. R. & Papp, S. B. Tailoring microcombs with inverse-designed, meta-dispersion microresonators. Nat. Photonics 17, 943–950 (2023)

    2023

  5. [13]

    A., Lukin, D

    Y ang, J., Guidry, M. A., Lukin, D. M., Y ang, K. & Vu ˇckovi´c, J. Inverse-designed silicon carbide quantum and nonlinear pho- tonics. Light Sci Appl 12, 201 (2023)

    2023

  6. [14]

    Miller, S. A. et al. Tunable frequency combs based on dual mi- croring resonators. Opt. Express, OE 23, 21527–21540 (2015)

    2015

  7. [15]

    Kim, S. et al. Dispersion engineering and frequency comb gen- eration in thin silicon nitride concentric microresonators. Nat. Commun. 8, 372 (2017)

    2017

  8. [16]

    Jang, J. K. et al. Synchronization of coupled optical microres- onators. Nat. Photonics 12, 688–693 (2018)

    2018

  9. [17]

    & Savona, V

    V asco, J. & Savona, V . Slow-light frequency combs and dissi- pative kerr solitons in coupled-cavity waveguides. Phys. Rev. Applied 12, 064065 (2019)

    2019

  10. [18]

    Helgason, ´O. B. et al. Dissipative solitons in photonic molecules. Nat. Photonics (2021)

    2021

  11. [19]

    Tikan, A. et al. Emergent nonlinear phenomena in a driven dissipative photonic dimer. Nat. Phys. 17, 604–610 (2021)

    2021

  12. [20]

    Y uan, Z. et al. Soliton pulse pairs at multiple colours in nor- mal dispersion microresonators. Nat. Photonics 17, 977–983 (2023)

    2023

  13. [21]

    Helgason, O. B. et al. Surpassing the nonlinear conversion ef- ficiency of soliton microcombs. Nat. Photonics 17, 992–999 (2023)

    2023

  14. [22]

    Mittal, S., Moille, G., Srinivasan, K., Chembo, Y . K. & Hafezi, M. Topological frequency combs and nested temporal solitons. Nat. Phys. 17, 1169–1176 (2021)

    2021

  15. [23]

    Flower, C. J. et al. Observation of topological frequency combs. Science 384, 1356–1361 (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    & Kippenberg, T

    Tusnin, A., Tikan, A., Komagata, K. & Kippenberg, T. J. Non- linear dynamics and kerr frequency comb formation in lattices of coupled microresonators. Communications Physics 6, 1–10 (2023)

    2023

  17. [26]

    Gong, Z. et al. Topological phases of non-hermitian systems. Phys. Rev. X 8, 031079 (2018)

    2018

  18. [27]

    & Ueda, M

    Ashida, Y ., Gong, Z. & Ueda, M. Non-hermitian physics. Adv. Phys. 69, 249–435 (2020)

    2020

  19. [28]

    & Sato, M

    Okuma, N., Kawabata, K., Shiozaki, K. & Sato, M. Topolog- ical origin of non-hermitian skin effects. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 086801 (2020)

    2020

  20. [29]

    & Sato, M

    Kawabata, K., Shiozaki, K., Ueda, M. & Sato, M. Symmetry and topology in non-hermitian physics. Phys. Rev. X 9, 041015 (2019)

    2019

  21. [30]

    & Sato, M

    Okuma, N. & Sato, M. Non-hermitian topological phenomena: A review. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.14, 83–107 (2023)

    2023

  22. [31]

    El-Ganainy, R. et al. Non-hermitian physics and PT symmetry. Nat. Phys. 14, 11–19 (2018)

    2018

  23. [32]

    & Al `u, A

    Miri, M.-A. & Al `u, A. Exceptional points in optics and photon- ics. Science 363, eaar7709 (2019)

    2019

  24. [33]

    G., Christodoulides, D

    Nasari, H., Pyrialakos, G. G., Christodoulides, D. N. & Kha- javikhan, M. Non-hermitian topological photonics. Opt. Mater . Express 13, 870 (2023)

    2023

  25. [34]

    Li, Z. et al. Synergetic positivity of loss and noise in nonlinear non-hermitian resonators. Sci. Adv. 9, eadi0562 (2023)

    2023

  26. [35]

    & Chong, Y

    Wang, Q. & Chong, Y . D. Non-hermitian photonic lattices: tutorial. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 40, 1443 (2023)

    2023

  27. [36]

    Fang, K. et al. Generalized non-reciprocity in an optomechan- ical circuit via synthetic magnetism and reservoir engineering. Nat. Phys. 13, 465–471 (2017)

    2017

  28. [37]

    & Clerk, A

    Metelmann, A. & Clerk, A. A. Nonreciprocal photon transmis- sion and amplification via reservoir engineering. Phys. Rev. X 5, 021025 (2015)

    2015

  29. [38]

    Weidemann, S. et al. Topological funneling of light. Science 368, 311–314 (2020)

    2020

  30. [39]

    Leefmans, C. et al. Topological dissipation in a time- multiplexed photonic resonator network. Nat. Phys. 18, 442– 449 (2022)

    2022

  31. [40]

    Ding, K., Fang, C. & Ma, G. Non-hermitian topology and exceptional-point geometries. Nature Reviews Physics 4, 745– 760 (2022)

    2022

  32. [41]

    Wang, K. et al. Generating arbitrary topological windings of a non-hermitian band. Science 371, 1240–1245 (2021)

    2021

  33. [42]

    Wang, K., Dutt, A., Wojcik, C. C. & Fan, S. Topological complex-energy braiding of non-hermitian bands. Nature 598, 59–64 (2021)

    2021

  34. [43]

    Chembo, Y . K. Kerr optical frequency combs: theory, applica- tions and perspectives. Nanophotonics 5, 7957 (2016)

    2016

  35. [44]

    Pernet, N. et al. Gap solitons in a one-dimensional driven- dissipative topological lattice. Nat. Phys. 18, 678–684 (2022)

    2022

  36. [45]

    Xia, S. et al. Nonlinear tuning of PT symmetry and non- hermitian topological states. Science 372, 72–76 (2021)

    2021

  37. [46]

    Dai, T. et al. Non-hermitian topological phase transitions con- trolled by nonlinearity. Nat. Phys. 20, 101–108 (2023)

    2023

  38. [47]

    Reisenbauer, M. et al. Non-hermitian dynamics and non- reciprocity of optically coupled nanoparticles. Nat. Phys. 20, 1629–1635 (2024)

    2024

  39. [48]

    Liu, Y . G. N. et al. Complex skin modes in non-hermitian cou- pled laser arrays. Light Sci Appl 11, 336 (2022)

    2022

  40. [49]

    Leefmans, C. R. et al. Topological temporally mode-locked laser. Nat. Phys. 20, 852–858 (2024)

    2024

  41. [50]

    A., Lukin, M

    Hafezi, M., Demler, E. A., Lukin, M. D. & Taylor, J. M. Robust optical delay lines with topological protection. Nature Physics 7, 907 (2011)

    2011

  42. [51]

    & Taylor, J

    Hafezi, M., Mittal, S., Fan, J., Migdall, A. & Taylor, J. Imaging topological edge states in silicon photonics. Nature Photonics 7, 1001 (2013)

    2013

  43. [54]

    & Wabnitz, S

    Hansson, T. & Wabnitz, S. Dynamics of microresonator fre- quency comb generation: models and stability. Nanophotonics 5, 231–243 (2016)

    2016

  44. [55]

    E., Chu, S

    Little, B. E., Chu, S. T., Haus, H. A., Foresi, J. & Laine, J. . Microring resonator channel dropping filters. Journal of Light- wave Technology 15, 998–1005 (1997)

    1997

  45. [56]

    Chembo, Y . K. & Menyuk, C. R. Spatiotemporal lugiato- lefever formalism for kerr-comb generation in whispering- gallery-mode resonators. Phys. Rev. A 87, 053852 (2013)

    2013

  46. [57]

    V ., Goldschmidt, E

    Mittal, S., Orre, V . V ., Goldschmidt, E. A. & Hafezi, M. Tun- able quantum interference using a topological source of indis- tinguishable photon pairs. Nat. Photonics 15, 542–548 (2021- 9 05-10)

    2021

  47. [58]

    On, M. B. et al. Programmable integrated photonics for topo- logical hamiltonians. Nat. Commun. 15, 629 (2024)

    2024

  48. [59]

    & Hafezi, M

    Mittal, S., Ganeshan, S., Fan, J., V aezi, A. & Hafezi, M. Mea- surement of topological invariants in a 2D photonic system. Nat. Photon. 10, 180–183 (2016)

    2016

  49. [60]

    V ., Leykam, D., Chong, Y

    Mittal, S., Orre, V . V ., Leykam, D., Chong, Y . D. & Hafezi, M. Photonic anomalous quantum hall effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 043201 (2019)

    2019

  50. [61]

    Mittal, S. et al. Photonic quadrupole topological phases. Nat. Photonics 13, 692–696 (2019)

    2019

  51. [62]

    J., Ren, Y ., Perron, D

    Afzal, S., Zimmerling, T. J., Ren, Y ., Perron, D. & V an, V . Re- alization of anomalous floquet insulators in strongly coupled nanophotonic lattices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 253601 (2020)

    2020

  52. [63]

    & Hayata, T

    Ozawa, T. & Hayata, T. Two-dimensional lattice with an imag- inary magnetic field. Phys. Rev. B. 109, 085113 (2024)

    2024

  53. [64]

    & Zhang, C

    Luo, X.-W. & Zhang, C. Higher-order topological corner states induced by gain and loss. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 073601 (2019)

    2019

  54. [65]

    Edvardsson, E., Kunst, F. K. & Bergholtz, E. J. Non- hermitian extensions of higher-order topological phases and their biorthogonal bulk-boundary correspondence. Phys. Rev. B 99, 081302 (2019)

    2019

  55. [66]

    Ozawa, T. et al. Topological photonics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 015006 (2019)

    2019

  56. [67]

    Zhang, M. et al. Broadband electro-optic frequency comb gen- eration in a lithium niobate microring resonator. Nature 568, 373–377 (2019)

    2019

  57. [68]

    & Schwefel, H

    Rueda, A., Sedlmeir, F., Kumari, M., Leuchs, G. & Schwefel, H. G. L. Resonant electro-optic frequency comb. Nature 568, 378–381 (2019)

    2019

  58. [69]

    Zhang, J. et al. Optomechanical dissipative solitons. Nature 600, 75–80 (2021)

    2021

  59. [70]

    Hussein, H. M. E., Kim, S., Rinaldi, M., Al `u, A. & Cassella, C. Passive frequency comb generation at radiofrequency for ranging applications. Nat. Commun. 15, 2844 (2024)

    2024

  60. [72]

    Pfeiffer, M. H. P . et al. Octave-spanning dissipative kerr soli- ton frequency combs in Si 3N4 microresonators. Optica 4, 684 (2017). Supplementary Materials Reconfigurable Non-Hermitian Soliton Combs using Dissipative Couplings and Topological Windings Seyed Danial Hashemi an...

    2017

  61. [73]

    Multiple-valued stationary state and its instability of the transmitted light by a ring cavity system

    Ikeda, K. Multiple-valued stationary state and its instability of the transmitted light by a ring cavity system. Opt. Commun. 30, 257–261 (1979)

    1979

  62. [74]

    & Wabnitz, S

    Hansson, T. & Wabnitz, S. Frequency comb generation beyond the Lugiato–Lefever equation: multi-stability and super cavity solitons. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, JOSAB 32, 1259–1266 (2015)

    2015

  63. [75]

    & Wabnitz, S

    Hansson, T. & Wabnitz, S. Dynamics of microresonator frequency comb generation: models and stability. Nanophotonics 5, 231–243 (2016). 7

    2016

  64. [76]

    Hashemi, S. D. & Mittal, S. Floquet topological dissipative kerr solitons and incommensurate frequency combs. Nat. Commun. 15, 1–9 (2024)

    2024

  65. [77]

    Boyd, R. W. Nonlinear Optics, Third Edition (Academic Press, Inc., USA, 2008), 3rd edn

    2008

  66. [78]

    Pfeiffer, M. H. P . et al. Octave-spanning dissipative kerr soliton frequency combs in Si 3N4 microresonators. Optica 4, 684 (2017)

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.