Experimental validation of the diverse incident angle performance of a pulse-width-dependent antenna based on a waveform-selective metasurface in a reverberation chamber

Hiroki Wakatsuchi; Kaito Ozawa

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 26 references

Experimental validation of the diverse incident angle performance of a pulse-width-dependent antenna based on a waveform-selective metasurface in a reverberation chamber

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A waveform-selective metasurface antenna can distinguish continuous waves from short pulses at the same frequency even when waves arrive from many angles, as validated by reverberation-chamber measurements.

desk verdict A genuinely useful reverberation-chamber measurement correction that honestly reports a VNA artifact, but the wide-angle claim needs chamber calibration and error bars before it is fully supported. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.03807 v1 pith:V34POWII submitted 2025-02-06 physics.app-ph cond-mat.other

Kaito Ozawa , Hiroki Wakatsuchi This is my paper · ORCID

classification physics.app-phcond-mat.other

keywords waveform-selectivemetasurfacepulse-width-dependentantennareverberationchamberdiverseincidentanglestime-domainmeasurementcontinuouswaveversusshortpulseelectromagneticnoisesuppressionfixed-frequencyfiltering

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that an antenna made from a waveform-selective metasurface can tell apart continuous waves and short pulses at the same frequency, even when the incoming waves strike from many different directions. Earlier versions of this antenna had only been tested at fixed incident angles, which is not how real wireless environments behave. The authors validate the wide-angle behavior by measuring in a reverberation chamber, where a rotating stirrer mixes fields and modes to emulate diverse arrivals. After correcting for the chamber's pulse-tail spreading by using a signal generator and oscilloscope with a sufficiently long pulse period, they find about a 10 dB higher transmittance for continuous waves than for 50-ns short pulses near 3.7 GHz. If the result holds, it means a fixed-frequency, time-domain degree of freedom can be harnessed for noise suppression in realistic multipath settings.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the waveform-selective metasurface unit cell: a periodic slit in a conducting sheet bridged by a rectifying diode bridge with a 10 nF capacitor and a 100 kΩ resistor. A short pulse charges the capacitor and the stored energy is dissipated through the parallel resistor, so SPs see low transmission; a long pulse or CW fully charges the capacitor, the diode bridge stops conducting, and the slit's intrinsic resonance is restored, giving high transmission. Around that cell, the antenna is a hexagonal-prism cage of six 2-by-3 metasurface panels surrounding a 20 mm grounded monopole. The reverberation chamber with its rotating stirrer supplies the diverse incident-angle environment, and the time-domain measurement protocol, signal generator plus oscilloscope, pulse period of at least 3 ms, and energy integrated over the full spread tail, is what makes the claim measurable.

What would settle it

Measure the same antenna in an anechoic chamber with the transmitter placed at controlled angles such as 0, 30, 60, and 90 degrees at 3.7 GHz; if the continuous-wave versus short-pulse transmittance gap disappears or changes sign at any angle, the diverse-angle claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that pulse-width selectivity survives a multipath, multi-angle environment. The antenna, a grounded monopole surrounded by six panels of a waveform-selective metasurface, is shown to transmit continuous waves (CWs) about 10 dB better than 50-ns short pulses (SPs) near 3.7 GHz after the measurement is done correctly. The correct measurement matters: with an ordinary VNA the received energy was underestimated because the reverberation chamber stretches every pulse into a long tail, producing an unrealistically broad bandwidth. By switching to a signal generator and oscilloscope, measuring over a long enough window, and setting the pulse period to at least 3 ms so the metasurface's stored charge fully discharges between pulses, the authors obtain a narrow, credible selective response. Because the transmittance is averaged over 360 stirrer positions, the authors interpret the result as validation that the waveform-selective receiving behavior is retained for a wide range of incident angles.

Load-bearing premise

The paper assumes that rotating the chamber's stirrer through 360 steps exposes the antenna to every relevant incoming angle, so the averaged energy counts as a test of wide-angle performance.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

At roughly 3.7 GHz, the antenna receives continuous waves with about 10 dB higher transmittance than 50-ns short pulses, even though signals arrive from many directions.
VNA-only measurements of this antenna in a reverberation chamber are misleading; the waveform tail demands time-domain energy integration and a pulse period long enough to discharge the metasurface.
The same antenna can act as a fixed-frequency filter that suppresses short-pulse noise while passing continuous-wave signals in multipath environments.
Pulse-width selectivity can be used as an extra time-domain degree of freedom without changing frequency, which matters where frequency assignments are tightly regulated.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A direct angle-resolved anechoic-chamber measurement at controlled angles such as 0, 30, 60, and 90 degrees would show whether the 10 dB gap is uniform per angle or only an average over the chamber's mode statistics.
The same reverberation-chamber protocol could be applied to other waveform-selective surfaces, using the measured spreading time as a calibration of chamber-induced pulse distortion.
If the transmittance gap carries over to communication links, the meaningful next metric would be signal-to-interference or bit-error-rate improvement against same-frequency short-pulse interferers, not transmittance alone.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Plainly: the most valuable part of this paper is the measurement correction. The authors show that a VNA-based frequency sweep in a reverberation chamber does not capture the full transmitted energy because the chamber stretches the pulse; they quantify the spreading time, pick a pulse period long enough, and then see a much sharper, narrower-band waveform-selective response at 3.7 GHz. Reporting the VNA artifact and fixing it with a time-domain setup is a legitimate methodological contribution, and the paper is honest about the discrepancy between Fig. 3c and Fig. 5.

The metasurface unit cell and the hexagonal antenna are prior work. The new claim is that the waveform-selective antenna keeps its pulse-width discrimination under multipath conditions with a wide range of incident angles.

The soft spot is exactly where the stress-test puts it: the angle claim leans entirely on the mode-stirred average. The paper gives no chamber characterization—no lowest usable frequency, no field-uniformity or anisotropy data, no estimate of how many independent stirrer states the 360 positions actually produce. At 3.7 GHz the stirrer might be well- or poorly-behaved; we are not told. Fig. 5 is plotted as mean curves with no error bars or scatter, so the 10 dB contrast could in principle be driven by a few stirrer angles. A bare-monopole baseline under the same conditions is also missing, which would help interpret the frequency response. These are not deal-breakers for the corrected measurement itself, but they are exactly what the "wide range of incident angles" conclusion needs before that claim is supportable.

The physical mechanism is credible and there is no circularity problem: pulse period and input power are measurement conditions, not fitted to produce the contrast. The shift from the simulated 4.1 GHz to the observed 3.7 GHz is not commented on, a minor gap.

This paper is for experimentalists working on waveform-selective metasurfaces or time-domain characterization in reverberation chambers, and for the EMC community interested in pulse-width filtering. It deserves a serious referee even though my own verdict is conditional: the corrected measurement is worth publishing, but the angle-diversity claim needs chamber calibration, error bars or per-angle data, and a baseline comparison. Send it to review with those requests.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports an experimental evaluation of a pulse-width-dependent antenna built from a waveform-selective metasurface. The antenna consists of a grounded monopole surrounded by six panels of diode-loaded unit cells, and the authors claim that it transmits continuous waves (CWs) more strongly than 50-ns short pulses (SPs) at the same frequency, even when waves arrive from many incident angles. To test this, they use a reverberation chamber whose stirrer is rotated in 1-degree steps over 360 positions, claiming that this mimics diverse incident angles. Recognizing that the initial VNA-based measurement missed long waveform tails, the authors switch to a signal-generator/oscilloscope setup, check the pulse spreading time and required pulse period, and report a corrected transmittance curve (Fig. 5) showing an approximately 10-dB CW-versus-SP difference around 3.7 GHz. The central conclusion is that waveform-selective metasurface antennas can filter different signals over a wide range of incident angles.

Significance. If the result holds, the paper makes a useful experimental contribution: it demonstrates a time-domain degree of freedom at a fixed frequency in a realistic multipath environment and, importantly, identifies and corrects a measurement pitfall (the VNA sweep misses the reverberation-chamber tail). The correction of the earlier flawed measurement is a genuine improvement, and the 10-dB contrast at 3.7 GHz is consistent with the underlying diode-bridge mechanism. The use of a reverberation chamber for this purpose is a reasonable idea, and the explicit checks of spreading time and pulse period are thoughtful. However, the headline claim of 'wide range of incident angles' depends on assumptions about the statistical completeness of the stirrer sweep that are not validated in the manuscript, and the final quantitative result lacks error bars or a reference baseline. The significance of the paper is therefore conditional on strengthening the chamber-metrology evidence.

major comments (4)

[Reverberation chamber method (Fig. 4, Fig. 5)] The central claim of 'wide range of incident angles' rests on averaging transmitted energy over 360 stirrer positions, but the paper gives no evidence that this stirrer sweep produces a statistically complete and independent set of incident-field realizations at the receive antenna. No chamber calibration is reported: there is no lowest usable frequency check, no field-uniformity or anisotropy data, no autocorrelation of S21 versus stirrer angle, and no estimate of the effective number of independent stirrer states. If adjacent 1-degree stirrer steps are highly correlated at 3.7 GHz, the effective sample count could be far smaller than 360, so the mean transmittance need not represent a 'wide range of incident angles.' Please add chamber characterization, report the distribution of transmittance over stirrer angles (e.g., error bars, percentiles, or angle-resolved curves), and either validate the mode-stirring assumption or reduce the claim to operation in a multipath environment.
[Transmittance calculation (Fig. 4, Fig. 5)] The quantitative 10-dB CW-versus-SP difference in Fig. 5 is presented without error bars, confidence intervals, or a reference measurement under identical chamber conditions. It is therefore unclear whether this difference is statistically meaningful and whether it is caused by the metasurface rather than by chamber loading, cable or amplifier drift, or the receiving antenna itself. Please report repeated measurements and the spread across stirrer positions, and include a control measurement (e.g., a bare monopole or a standard reference antenna) normalized in the same way.
[Time-domain integration (Fig. 4b–Fig. 4d)] The paper checks the pulse spreading time and the required pulse period, but it never states the exact time window over which the received energy is integrated to produce Fig. 5. For a 50-ns SP repeated with a 3-ms period, the integration window (e.g., only the first 2.4 us, the full 3 ms, or the entire record) strongly affects the SP energy; the same ambiguity applies to the CW case. Please specify the integration interval and demonstrate that the computed transmittance is insensitive to the chosen window.
[Simulation-to-experiment comparison (Fig. 2 vs. Fig. 5)] The unit-cell simulation in Fig. 2 predicts the maximum CW/SP contrast near 4.1 GHz, whereas the antenna-level measurement in Fig. 5 shows the contrast only around 3.7 GHz. The paper offers no full-antenna simulation or measured S-parameters to connect these two results, so the mechanism attributed to the waveform-selective metasurface is not fully established at the antenna level. Please add a simulated or measured antenna-level frequency response, or provide an explicit explanation for the frequency shift.

minor comments (5)

[Title and header] The first line of the full text repeats 'Experimental validation of the diverse incident angle' twice; please fix this duplication in the title or running header.
[Fig. 3c] The return loss of the bare monopole is plotted on the same vertical axis as transmittance, which is dimensionally different; use a secondary axis or clearly label both scales.
[Fig. 4c] The vertical bars are described only as 'variations'; specify whether they are standard deviation, min–max range, or some other measure of spread.
[References] Reference [23] lacks volume and page information; please update the citation with complete bibliographic details.
[Introduction, RC description] The phrase 'mimicking of complicated wireless communication environments' would be more precise: a reverberation chamber provides a statistically isotropic multipath environment, not a site-specific wireless channel emulation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the central CW/SP contrast is a measured observable, not a quantity derived from a fitted model or self-cited premise.

full rationale

This paper reports an experimental validation of a previously proposed waveform-selective metasurface antenna. The load-bearing claim, that the antenna transmits continuous waves roughly 10 dB better than 50-ns short pulses around 3.7 GHz, is a directly measured quantity obtained from time-domain transmitted and incident energies in a reverberation chamber. No parameter is fitted to the CW/SP contrast, and no prediction is computed from a model whose inputs include the target result. The unit-cell simulation in Fig. 2 is used only to illustrate the known mechanism and is not used to calibrate the experimental transmittance curves. Citations to prior work by the same group explain the physics of the diode-bridge circuit, but the experimental data stand independently of those derivations. The reverberation-chamber method is a measurement procedure, not an inference that reduces to its own inputs. The concern that stirrer averaging may not fully represent all incident angles is a question of experimental validation and statistical sufficiency, not circularity. Accordingly, no self-definitional, fitted-input, self-citation-load-bearing, or ansatz-smuggling circular step is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim is experimental and uses no fitted model; however, it rests on background assumptions: the reverberation chamber stirrer gives enough angular diversity, the prior waveform-selective unit cell works as modeled at the chosen power, the 3 ms period avoids memory effects, and the ANSYS simulation is accurate. The input power and pulse period are hand-chosen measurement conditions, listed as free parameters because the result depends on them.

free parameters (2)

Input power level = 35 dBm
Hand-chosen to turn on the diodes; the waveform-selective contrast is expected to be power-dependent, so the result is conditional on this operating point.
Pulse period = 3 ms
Hand-chosen after checking that transient transmittance saturated for periods greater than 3 ms (Fig. 4d); it is a measurement condition rather than a fitted model constant.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption Reverberation chamber mode-stirring yields a sufficiently diverse and representative set of incident angles, so averaging over stirrer positions validates wide-angle performance.
The paper uses the chamber and stirrer rotation to emulate many incident angles (Figs. 3b, 4a), but does not report angle-resolved or segment-resolved data.
domain assumption The waveform-selective unit cell from prior work (diode bridge, 10 nF capacitor, 100 kOhm resistor) behaves as modeled at 35 dBm input power in the chamber environment.
The design and mechanism are taken from refs. [17,19]; the present paper does not independently verify the circuit model under chamber loading.
domain assumption The 3 ms pulse period is long enough to avoid energy-memory effects from the metasurface and the chamber tail.
Chosen from the saturation observation in Fig. 4d; this is a measurement condition, not a fitted model parameter.
domain assumption ANSYS co-simulation accurately represents the periodic unit-cell transmittance used to explain the mechanism.
Fig. 2 results rely on ANSYS 2022 co-simulation; no independent verification is provided.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Experimental validation of the diverse incident angle performance of a pulse-width-dependent antenna based on a waveform-selective metasurface in a reverberation chamber." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/V34POWII

@misc{pith2026250203807,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Experimental validation of the diverse incident angle performance of a pulse-width-dependent antenna based on a waveform-selective metasurface in a reverberation chamber},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/V34POWII}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.03807}
}

read the original abstract

We present experimental validation results of a pulse-width-dependent antenna based on a waveform-selective metasurface that behaves differently according to the incoming waveform, more specifically, the incoming pulse width, even at a fixed frequency. This waveform-selective behavior is integrated with an antenna design to preferentially accept a predetermined incoming waveform while rejecting another waveform at the same frequency. In particular, we report how the waveform-selective antenna performance can be evaluated for diverse incident angles, which is enabled by a measurement method based on a reverberation chamber. This method facilitates variation of the electromagnetic fields and modes inside the chamber and mimicking of complicated wireless communication environments through rotation of the internal stirrer. The experimental results verify that our antenna design concept based on waveform-selective metasurfaces can filter different signals with a wide range of incident angles, opening the door to utilizing such pulse-width-dependent antennas to suppress electromagnetic noise in more realistic wireless communication environments.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.03807 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2. Model of the periodic unit cell of the proposed wavefo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3. Pulse-width-dependent metasurface-based antenna [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (2 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Time-domain measurement results. (a) Measurement s [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. Transmittances obtained using the measurement meth [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

26 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages

[1]

Engheta \ and\ author R

author author N. Engheta \ and\ author R. Ziolkowski ,\ @noop title Metamaterials physics and engineering explorations \ ( publisher IEEE press, John Wiley & Sons ,\ address Piscataway, NJ ,\ year 2006 ) NoStop

work page 2006
[2]

Sievenpiper , author L

author author D. Sievenpiper , author L. Zhang , author R. F. J. \ Broas , author N. G. \ Alex o polous , \ and\ author E. Yablonovitch ,\ title title High-impedance electromagnetic surfaces with a forbidden frequency band , \ @noop journal journal IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. \ volume 47 ,\ pages 2059--2074 ( year 1999 ) NoStop

work page 1999
[3]

Yu , author P

author author N. Yu , author P. Genevet , author M. A. \ Kats , author F. Aieta , author J.-P. \ Tetienne , author F. Capasso , \ and\ author Z. Gaburro ,\ title title Light propagation with phase discontinuities: generalized laws of reflection and refraction , \ @noop journal journal Science \ volume 334 ,\ pages 333--337 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

work page 2011
[4]

Yu \ and\ author F

author author N. Yu \ and\ author F. Capasso ,\ title title Flat optics with designer metasurfaces , \ @noop journal journal Nat.\ Mater. \ volume 13 ,\ pages 139--150 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

work page 2014
[5]

Pfeiffer \ and\ author A

author author C. Pfeiffer \ and\ author A. Grbic ,\ title title Metamaterial huygens' surfaces: tailoring wave fronts with reflectionless sheets , \ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 110 ,\ pages 197401 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

work page 2013
[6]

Christopoulos ,\ @noop title Principles and techniques of electromagnetics compatibility ,\ edition 3rd \ ed.\ ( publisher CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group ,\ address London, U.K

author author C. Christopoulos ,\ @noop title Principles and techniques of electromagnetics compatibility ,\ edition 3rd \ ed.\ ( publisher CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group ,\ address London, U.K. ,\ year 2022 ) NoStop

work page 2022
[7]

Lapine , author I

author author M. Lapine , author I. V. \ Shadrivov , \ and\ author Y. S. \ Kivshar ,\ title title Colloquium: nonlinear metamaterials , \ @noop journal journal Reviews of Modern Physics \ volume 86 ,\ pages 1093 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

work page 2014
[8]

author author P. J. \ Antsaklis \ and\ author A. N. \ Michel ,\ @noop title Linear systems ,\ Vol. volume 8 \ ( publisher Springer ,\ year 1997 ) NoStop

work page 1997

Show all 26 references

[9]

Takeshita , author A

author author H. Takeshita , author A. A. \ Fathnan , author D. Nita , author A. Nagata , author S. Sugiura , \ and\ author H. Wakatsuchi ,\ title title Frequency-hopping wave engineering with metasurfaces , \ @noop journal journal Nature Communications \ volume 15 ,\ pages 19...

2024
[10]

Luo , author X

author author Z. Luo , author X. Chen , author J. Long , author R. Quarfoth , \ and\ author D. Sievenpiper ,\ title title Self-focusing of electromagnetic surface waves on a nonlinear impedance surface , \ @noop journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volume 106 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

2015
[11]

Li , author S

author author A. Li , author S. Kim , author Y. Luo , author Y. Li , author J. Long , \ and\ author D. F. \ Sievenpiper ,\ title title High-power transistor-based tunable and switchable metasurface absorber , \ @noop journal journal IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. \ volume 65...

2017
[12]

Li , author Z

author author A. Li , author Z. Luo , author H. Wakatsuchi , author S. Kim , \ and\ author D. F. \ Sievenpiper ,\ title title Nonlinear, active, and tunable metasurfaces for advanced electromagnetics applications , \ @noop journal journal IEEE Access \ volume 5 ,\ pages 27439-...

2017
[13]

Wakatsuchi , author S

author author H. Wakatsuchi , author S. Kim , author J. J. \ Rushton , \ and\ author D. F. \ Sievenpiper ,\ title title Circuit-based nonlinear metasurface absorbers for high power surface currents , \ @noop journal journal Appl.\ Phys.\ Lett. \ volume 102 ,\ pages 214103 ( ye...

2013
[14]

Zhou , author L

author author L. Zhou , author L. Liu , \ and\ author Z. Shen ,\ title title High-performance energy selective surface based on the double-resonance concept , \ @noop journal journal IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation \ volume 69 ,\ pages 7658--7666 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

2021
[15]

Wang , author X

author author Y. Wang , author X. Min , author M. Zhao , author H. Yuan , author R. Li , author X. Hu , \ and\ author Q. Cao ,\ title title Design of a frequency selective rasorber with a waveform selective passband , \ @noop journal journal IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagat...

2022
[16]

Wakatsuchi , author S

author author H. Wakatsuchi , author S. Kim , author J. J. \ Rushton , \ and\ author D. F. \ Sievenpiper ,\ title title Waveform-dependent absorbing metasurfaces , \ @noop journal journal Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett. \ volume 111 ,\ pages 245501 ( year 2013 b ) NoStop

2013
[17]

Wakatsuchi , author J

author author H. Wakatsuchi , author J. Long , \ and\ author D. F. \ Sievenpiper ,\ title title Waveform selective surfaces , \ @noop journal journal Advanced Functional Materials \ volume 29 ,\ pages 1806386 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

2019
[18]

author author M. F. Imani \ and\ author D. R. \ Smith ,\ title title Temporal microwave ghost imaging using a reconfigurable disordered cavity , \ @noop journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volume 116 ,\ pages 054102 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

2020
[19]

Ushikoshi , author R

author author D. Ushikoshi , author R. Higashiura , author K. Tachi , author A. A. \ Fathnan , author S. Mahmood , author H. Takeshita , author H. Homma , author M. R. \ Akram , author S. Vellucci , author J. Lee , et al. ,\ title title Pulse-driven self-reconfigurable meta-an...

2023
[20]

Ushikoshi \ and\ author H

author author D. Ushikoshi \ and\ author H. Wakatsuchi ,\ title title Metasurfaces to control direction of wave propagation at the same frequency , \ in\ @noop booktitle 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation & USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting \ ...

2018
[21]

Vellucci , author A

author author S. Vellucci , author A. Monti , author M. Barbuto , author A. Toscano , \ and\ author F. Bilotti ,\ title title Waveform-selective mantle cloaks for intelligent antennas , \ @noop journal journal IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. \ volume 68 ,\ pages 1717--1725 ( year...

2019
[22]

Barbuto , author D

author author M. Barbuto , author D. Lione , author A. Monti , author S. Vellucci , author F. Bilotti , \ and\ author A. Toscano ,\ title title Waveguide components and aperture antennas with frequency-and time-domain selectivity properties , \ @noop journal journal IEEE Trans...

2020
[23]

Barbuto , author Z

author author M. Barbuto , author Z. Hamzavi-Zarghani , author M. Longhi , author A. Monti , author D. Ramaccia , author S. Vellucci , author A. Toscano , \ and\ author F. Bilotti ,\ title title Metasurfaces 3.0: a new paradigm for enabling smart electromagnetic environments ,...

2021
[24]

Asano , author T

author author K. Asano , author T. Nakasha , \ and\ author H. Wakatsuchi ,\ title title Simplified equivalent circuit approach for designing time-domain responses of waveform-selective metasurfaces , \ @noop journal journal Appl. Phys. Lett. \ volume 116 ,\ pages 171603 ( year...

2020
[25]

Wakatsuchi ,\ title title Time-domain filtering of metasurfaces , \ @noop journal journal Sci

author author H. Wakatsuchi ,\ title title Time-domain filtering of metasurfaces , \ @noop journal journal Sci. Rep. \ volume 5 ,\ pages 16737 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

2015
[26]

author author K. N. \ Rozanov ,\ title title Ultimate thickness to bandwidth ratio of radar absorbers , \ @noop journal journal IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation \ volume 48 ,\ pages 1230--1234 ( year 2000 ) NoStop

2000

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Engheta \ and\ author R

author author N. Engheta \ and\ author R. Ziolkowski ,\ @noop title Metamaterials physics and engineering explorations \ ( publisher IEEE press, John Wiley & Sons ,\ address Piscataway, NJ ,\ year 2006 ) NoStop

work page 2006

[2] [2]

Sievenpiper , author L

author author D. Sievenpiper , author L. Zhang , author R. F. J. \ Broas , author N. G. \ Alex o polous , \ and\ author E. Yablonovitch ,\ title title High-impedance electromagnetic surfaces with a forbidden frequency band , \ @noop journal journal IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. \ volume 47 ,\ pages 2059--2074 ( year 1999 ) NoStop

work page 1999

[3] [3]

Yu , author P

author author N. Yu , author P. Genevet , author M. A. \ Kats , author F. Aieta , author J.-P. \ Tetienne , author F. Capasso , \ and\ author Z. Gaburro ,\ title title Light propagation with phase discontinuities: generalized laws of reflection and refraction , \ @noop journal journal Science \ volume 334 ,\ pages 333--337 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

work page 2011

[4] [4]

Yu \ and\ author F

author author N. Yu \ and\ author F. Capasso ,\ title title Flat optics with designer metasurfaces , \ @noop journal journal Nat.\ Mater. \ volume 13 ,\ pages 139--150 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

work page 2014

[5] [5]

Pfeiffer \ and\ author A

author author C. Pfeiffer \ and\ author A. Grbic ,\ title title Metamaterial huygens' surfaces: tailoring wave fronts with reflectionless sheets , \ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 110 ,\ pages 197401 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

work page 2013

[6] [6]

Christopoulos ,\ @noop title Principles and techniques of electromagnetics compatibility ,\ edition 3rd \ ed.\ ( publisher CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group ,\ address London, U.K

author author C. Christopoulos ,\ @noop title Principles and techniques of electromagnetics compatibility ,\ edition 3rd \ ed.\ ( publisher CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group ,\ address London, U.K. ,\ year 2022 ) NoStop

work page 2022

[7] [7]

Lapine , author I

author author M. Lapine , author I. V. \ Shadrivov , \ and\ author Y. S. \ Kivshar ,\ title title Colloquium: nonlinear metamaterials , \ @noop journal journal Reviews of Modern Physics \ volume 86 ,\ pages 1093 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

work page 2014

[8] [8]

author author P. J. \ Antsaklis \ and\ author A. N. \ Michel ,\ @noop title Linear systems ,\ Vol. volume 8 \ ( publisher Springer ,\ year 1997 ) NoStop

work page 1997