Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Out-of-equilibrium quantum thermochemical engine with one-dimensional Bose gas

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Chemical work from particle inflow makes a sudden-quench quantum engine reach near-maximum efficiency

desk verdict Chemical work can indeed rescue efficiency in a sudden-quench 1D Bose-gas engine, but the paper's headline parameters violate its own 1D timescale condition. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.13041 v2 pith:V5U42S55 submitted 2024-11-20 cond-mat.quant-gas

Vijit V. Nautiyal This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.quant-gas
keywords quantumthermochemicalengineone-dimensionalBosegasquasicondensateOttocyclesuddenquenchchemicalworkc-fieldmethodSPGPE
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that an interaction-driven Otto cycle using a harmonically trapped one-dimensional Bose gas in the quasicondensate regime can operate as an engine only when the working fluid exchanges particles with the reservoirs, not heat alone. By letting on the order of a thousand particles flow in from the hot reservoir during the hot thermalization stroke, the cycle produces negative net work and converts that extra chemical energy into mechanical work during the expansion stroke. The central quantitative claim is that this quantum thermochemical engine reaches efficiencies close to the quasistatic near-maximum limit even when the work strokes are sudden quenches, while keeping power output orders of magnitude higher than in the quasistatic case. The paper also claims that the efficiency and work of the finite-temperature engine are bounded above by the analytically known zero-temperature adiabatic engine limit, whose efficiency is $1 - (g_c/g_h)^{2/3}$. The reason a careful reader should care is that it suggests a simple, shortcut-free way to soften the power-efficiency trade-off in many-body quantum engines.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the diffusive thermalization stroke, implemented with the stochastic projected Gross-Pitaevskii equation (SPGPE), which couples the low-energy c-field working fluid to a reservoir of high-energy modes and allows both heat and particle exchange. The particle inflow $\Delta N$ during the hot stroke is the chemical work that supplies extra input energy $E_{\rm in} = Q_h + W_{\rm chem}$, and the efficiency is defined as the ratio $\eta = -W/E_{\rm in}$. The unitary work strokes are simulated with the projected Gross-Pitaevskii equation (PGPE) during a linear quench of the interaction strength $g$ between $g_c$ and $g_h$. The paper benchmarks everything against the Thomas-Fermi zero-temperature results, with maximum efficiency $\eta_{\max}(T=0) = 1 - (g_c/g_h)^{2/3}$ and a corresponding maximum-work expression, which act as analytical upper bounds throughout the finite-temperature analysis.

What would settle it

Run the identical cycle with $\Delta N = 0$ in a faithful c-field simulation: the paper predicts the net work stays positive, so observing negative net work would falsify the chemical-work claim. Separately, if a sudden-quench run with large $\Delta N$ yields efficiency above $1 - (g_c/g_h)^{2/3}$, the zero-temperature upper-bound claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is that chemical work, meaning particle inflow during thermalization rather than heat alone, is what makes the Otto cycle run. With no net particle exchange ($\Delta N \simeq 0$), the cycle absorbs energy instead of extracting it, so it cannot act as an engine; with $\Delta N$ on the order of hundreds to thousands of particles, net work becomes negative and efficiency rises with $\Delta N$, saturating near the zero-temperature adiabatic limit. The same efficiency can be reached in the sudden-quench regime, where work strokes take $t_w = 0.05/\omega$, as in the quasistatic regime, because the irreversible work from breathing-mode excitations is relatively small; at the shortest quench time the efficiency is about 43% of the zero-temperature adiabatic bound for the parameters used, and increasing $\Delta N$ closes much of the remaining gap. The numerical results are obtained by simulating all four strokes with the c-field method, using the projected Gross-Pitaevskii equation for the unitary work strokes and the stochastic projected Gross-Pitaevskii equation for diffusive thermalization, so the efficiency $\eta = -W/E_{\rm in}$ counts both heat and chemical work in the cost.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the low-energy modes of the one-dimensional Bose gas can be treated as a classical field whose high-energy modes act as a passive thermal reservoir; if quantum fluctuations in the quasicondensate significantly change the dynamics, the computed energies, net work, and efficiencies would shift.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A sudden-quench interaction-driven Otto cycle can deliver near-maximum efficiency without shortcut-to-adiabaticity control, at power levels orders of magnitude above quasistatic operation.
  • The efficiency and net work of finite-temperature realizations of this cycle are capped by the zero-temperature adiabatic values, so performance claims can be benchmarked against $1 - (g_c/g_h)^{2/3}$.
  • For a fixed quench duration, increasing the number of particles exchanged with the hot reservoir raises both net work and efficiency until saturation, giving a practical control knob that does not require slow driving.
  • Because heat alone cannot make this particular cycle work, thermochemical, particle-exchanging reservoirs are essential to the design, not an optional enhancement.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: the same chemical-work lever could improve other interaction-driven or volume-driven quantum Otto cycles whose heat-only operation is weak, with the exchanged particle number replacing stroke duration as the main efficiency control.
  • Beyond the paper: the results suggest a general resource picture for many-body quantum engines, namely that what matters is the chemical-potential difference the reservoirs can supply, not just the temperature difference, so particle-exchanging reservoirs may generically outperform thermal ones at fixed cycle time.
  • Beyond the paper: an atom-chip experiment could measure the threshold particle inflow below which net work is positive; the paper's parameters put that threshold near $\Delta N \simeq 200$.
  • Beyond the paper: repeating the calculation in the strongly interacting Tonks-Girardeau regime with a method valid there, such as generalized hydrodynamics, would test whether the zero-temperature upper bound survives outside the quasicondensate regime.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies a finite-time quantum thermochemical Otto engine whose working fluid is a harmonically trapped, weakly interacting 1D Bose gas in the quasicondensate regime. The unitary work strokes are interaction quenches simulated with the projected Gross-Pitaevskii equation, and the thermalization strokes are simulated with the stochastic projected Gross-Pitaevskii equation, allowing both heat and particle exchange with the reservoirs. The central claims are that particle inflow from the hot reservoir provides chemical work that enables engine operation, that a sudden-quench engine can reach efficiencies close to the quasistatic limit while maintaining high power, and that an adiabatic zero-temperature cycle from Ref. [9] provides an upper bound on the finite-temperature efficiency and work. The quantitative evidence is based on c-field/SPGPE simulations for a single set of 87Rb parameters, benchmarked against zero-temperature Thomas-Fermi expressions.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper offers a simple, experimentally plausible route to improving the power-efficiency trade-off of a quantum Otto engine without shortcuts to adiabaticity, and it extends the zero-temperature interaction-driven engine of Ref. [9] to finite temperatures. The use of the c-field/SPGPE method is appropriate for the quasicondensate regime, and the comparison with external Thomas-Fermi benchmarks rather than fitted quantities is a genuine strength. The paper also makes falsifiable predictions for a specific experimental system, including the threshold particle number needed for engine operation and the saturation of efficiency at large chemical work. However, the numerical basis is thinner than the presentation suggests: stochastic results lack error bars and trajectory counts, and the advertised sudden-quench operating point violates the manuscript's own 1D timescale criterion.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section II.D, Eq. (12), and footnote [122]] The sudden-quench time used in Figs. 2-6, tw = 0.05/omega, is shorter than the transverse time t_perp = 2pi/omega_perp, contrary to the stated regime criterion t_perp << tw << t_parallel. With the quoted parameters (omega/2pi = 20 Hz, omega_perp/2pi = 1.81 kHz), t_perp is approximately 0.55 ms and tw is approximately 0.40 ms, so tw/t_perp is roughly 0.72 and the inequality in Eq. (12) fails. Because the PGPE/SPGPE simulations are strictly longitudinal, they cannot capture transverse mode excitation if the quench is implemented by changing omega_perp. If the quench is instead a Feshbach sweep at fixed transverse confinement, then Eq. (12) is not the relevant criterion and the paper must say so. In either case, the headline 'near-maximum efficiency at high power' demonstration at tw = 0.05/omega is anchored in a parameter region that the manuscript itself rules out for the 1D description.
  2. [Section III.E and Section IV] The paper repeatedly claims to 'show' that the zero-temperature adiabatic engine from Ref. [9] provides an upper bound on the finite-temperature efficiency and work, but no derivation of this inequality is supplied. Equations (14) and (15) are external Thomas-Fermi benchmarks, and the bound is checked numerically only for the parameter sets in Figs. 2, 4, 5, and 6. The abstract and conclusions present the bound as a general result; the manuscript should either weaken this language to a numerical observation for the studied parameters or provide an analytical argument establishing the bound.
  3. [Section II.B, Eqs. (2) and (6), and Figs. 2-6] The SPGPE results are stochastic averages, but the manuscript does not give the number of independent trajectories, the value of the growth rate Gamma, or the energy cutoff epsilon_cut, and no error bars are shown in any figure. These details are needed to judge whether the reported differences, such as the sudden-quench versus quasistatic efficiency gap in Fig. 5(b) and the saturation in Fig. 4(b), are statistically meaningful and reproducible.
  4. [Section III.C, Fig. 3] At the shortest quench time tw = 0.05/omega, the text reports eta/eta_max(T=0) approximately 0.43 while describing the engine as operating 'at efficiencies close to the maximum efficiency achieved by the quasistatic engine.' A reader cannot reconcile 0.43 with 'close.' Please quantify the relevant comparison, for example the sudden-quench efficiency relative to the quasistatic efficiency at the same DeltaN and Th/Tc, or restrict the 'near-maximum' claim to the large-DeltaN regime of Fig. 4(b), which is where the main result is most cleanly demonstrated.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Footnote [122]] The scattering length is written as 'as = 5.31, nm'; the comma is a typo and should be removed.
  2. [Section II.B.3] The text says the expansion stroke concludes at point B, but the expression for Wexp uses <H>_C - <H>_B; the end point should be C.
  3. [Fig. 2 caption] The caption does not make clear how the QHE curves (yellow and purple) are treated in panels (b)-(d) once points with -W < 0 are omitted, and the legend in the printed raster is difficult to read.
  4. [Eq. (2)] The operator is introduced as L^{(C)}_s but the subscript s is not used consistently elsewhere; please unify the notation.
  5. [Reference [67]] The reference entry for Greiner et al. is misformatted, with the author list appearing inside the title field; this should be corrected.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: finite-temperature SPGPE results are simulated and benchmarked against external zero-temperature formulas; author self-citations are background, not load-bearing.

full rationale

The engine figures of merit are computed directly from SPGPE/PGPE Hamiltonian-energy differences (Eqs. 5-10), so no target quantity is fitted from the data it is claimed to predict. The zero-temperature benchmarks (Eqs. 14-15) are taken from external Ref. [9] and used as comparison; the finite-temperature quasistatic SPGPE results independently approach and remain below them, giving the 'upper bound' claim independent content. The Delta N sweeps (Figs. 4-5) are genuine parameter scans; the saturation of eta toward eta_max(T=0) at large Delta N reflects approach to the zero-temperature Thomas-Fermi regime rather than a fitted parameter relabeled as a prediction. Author self-citations (Refs. [4,24]) are background/methodological and do not carry the efficiency-power argument. The main caveat is a parameter-regime consistency issue, not circularity: Eq. (12) defines the sudden-quench regime by t_perp << tw << t_parallel, while footnote [122] gives t_parallel = 2pi/omega = 50 ms, t_perp = 2pi/omega_perp ~ 0.55 ms, and tw = 0.05/omega ~ 0.40 ms for the headline sudden-quench point, so tw < t_perp and the paper's own 1D criterion is violated. This is a separate correctness/regime risk; it does not reduce any equation or result to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central quantitative results depend on the validity of the SPGPE c-field method and on a handful of control parameters (cutoff, growth rate, trajectory count) not specified; no new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • SPGPE energy cutoff epsilon_cut = not specified
    Defines the boundary between c-field and thermal reservoir; chosen by hand, affects particle number and energy in the c-field.
  • SPGPE growth rate Gamma = not specified
    Numerical parameter controlling coupling rate; stated not to affect equilibrium, but affects relaxation dynamics.
  • Number of stochastic realizations = not specified
    No trajectory counts given; affects statistical error and the reliability of the computed averages.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Classical field (c-field) description is valid for highly occupied low-energy modes in the weakly interacting quasicondensate regime
    SPGPE/PGPE treat low-energy modes as a classical complex field; validity requires high occupancy, assumed throughout Sec. II.B.
  • domain assumption Grand-canonical coupling during thermalization strokes captures combined heat and particle exchange
    The simple growth SPGPE models diffusive contact with a thermal reservoir; assumed to reproduce the correct grand-canonical equilibrium state (Appendix B).
  • domain assumption Thermalization strokes are instantaneous compared to work strokes
    Power is computed as P = -W/2tw, ignoring thermalization time; justified by an infinite reservoir assumption in Sec. II.B.4.
  • domain assumption The zero-temperature adiabatic QTE formulas (Eqs. 14 and 15) from Ref. [9] are valid benchmarks
    Used as upper bounds for finite-temperature numerical results; derived via Thomas-Fermi approximation in prior work, not re-derived here.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Out-of-equilibrium quantum thermochemical engine with one-dimensional Bose gas." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/V5U42S55

@misc{pith2026241113041,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Out-of-equilibrium quantum thermochemical engine with one-dimensional Bose gas},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/V5U42S55}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.13041}
}
read the original abstract

We theoretically explore the finite-time performance of a quantum thermochemical engine using a harmonically trapped 1D Bose gas in the quasicondensate regime as the working fluid. Operating on an Otto cycle, the engine's unitary work strokes involve quenches of interatomic interactions, treating the fluid as a closed many-body quantum system evolving dynamically from an initial thermal state. During thermalization strokes, the fluid is an open system in diffusive contact with a reservoir, enabling both heat and particle exchange. Using a c--field approach, we demonstrate that the engine operates via chemical work, driven by particle flow from the hot reservoir. The engine's performance is analyzed in two regimes: (i) the out-of-equilibrium regime, maximizing power at reduced efficiency, and (ii) the quasistatic limit, achieving maximum efficiency but zero power due to slow driving. Remarkably, chemical work enables maximum efficiency even in sudden quench regime, offering a favorable trade-off between power and efficiency. Finally, we connect this work to prior research, showing that a zero-temperature adiabatic cycle provides an upper bound for efficiency and work at finite temperatures.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.13041 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic diagram of the proposed quantum thermo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. To begin the first work stroke (compression) of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Net work, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: illustrates the trade-off between power and effi￾ciency in the finite-time operation of the QTE. Specifi￾cally, efficiency and power are plotted as functions of the quench duration of the work strokes, tw. As expected, increasing efficiency in finite-time operations co…
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Net work, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Net work, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Efficiency, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Efficiency, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Schematic representation of physical processes in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Asymmetric Quantum Harmonic Otto Engine Under Hot Squeezed Thermal Reservoir

    quant-ph 2024-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    For an asymmetric quantum Otto engine with a hot squeezed reservoir, sudden-expansion efficiency is capped at 1/2, while sudden-compression efficiency can approach unity under strong squeezing.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

147 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [9]

    Feshbach engine in the Thomas-Fermi regime

    Tim Keller, Thom´ as Fogarty, Jing Li, and Thomas Busch. Feshbach engine in the Thomas-Fermi regime. Physical Review Research, 2(3):033335, 2020

    2020

  2. [122]

    Irreversible performance of a quantum harmonic heat engine

    Yair Rezek and Ronnie Kosloff. Irreversible performance of a quantum harmonic heat engine. New Journal of Physics, 8(5):83, 2006

    work page 2006

  3. [1]

    benefit” of operation is the net work output of the working fluid, while the “cost

    Maximum efficiency of a heat engine In Fig. 7, we compare the efficiency of our proposed sudden quench QTE with that of a Carnot engine oper- ating between the same temperature ratios of the ther- mal reservoirs. At low temperatures, the efficiency of our QTE appears to surpass the Carnot limit, which may suggest a violation of classical thermodynamic bou...

  4. [2]

    We underscore that Eq

    Why the Carnot efficiency is not the upper bound for the proposed thermochemical engine Our proposed QTE is fundamentally different from a conventional heat engine. We underscore that Eq. (22) is derived assuming canonical ensemble between the reser- voir and the working fluid, i.e., if during the thermaliza- tion strokes, the increase in internal energy ...

  5. [3]

    Bosons outper- form fermions: The thermodynamic advantage of sym- metry

    Nathan M Myers and Sebastian Deffner. Bosons outper- form fermions: The thermodynamic advantage of sym- metry. Physical Review E , 101(1):012110, 2020

    2020

  6. [4]

    A quan- tum heat engine driven by atomic collisions

    Quentin Bouton, Jens Nettersheim, Sabrina Burgardt, Daniel Adam, Eric Lutz, and Artur Widera. A quan- tum heat engine driven by atomic collisions. Nature Communications, 12(1):2063, 2021

    2021

  7. [5]

    A quantum engine in the BEC–BCS crossover

    Jennifer Koch, Keerthy Menon, Eloisa Cuestas, Sian Barbosa, Eric Lutz, Thom´ as Fogarty, Thomas Busch, and Artur Widera. A quantum engine in the BEC–BCS crossover. Nature, 621(7980):723–727, 2023

    2023

  8. [6]

    An interaction- driven many-particle quantum heat engine and its uni- versal behavior

    Yang-Yang Chen, Gentaro Watanabe, Yi-Cong Yu, Xi- Wen Guan, and Adolfo del Campo. An interaction- driven many-particle quantum heat engine and its uni- versal behavior. npj Quantum Information , 5(1):88, 2019

    2019

Show all 147 references
  1. [7]

    A finite-time quantum Otto engine with tunnel coupled one-dimensional Bose gases

    Vijit Vinod Nautiyal, Raymon S Watson, and Karen V Kheruntsyan. A finite-time quantum Otto engine with tunnel coupled one-dimensional Bose gases. New Jour- nal of Physics , 2024

    2024

  2. [8]

    A many-body heat engine at criticality

    Thom´ as Fogarty and Thomas Busch. A many-body heat engine at criticality. Quantum Science and Technology, 6(1):015003, 2020

    2020

  3. [10]

    Simmons, Roshan Sajjad, Kimberlee Keith- ley, Hector Mas, Jeremy L

    Ethan Q. Simmons, Roshan Sajjad, Kimberlee Keith- ley, Hector Mas, Jeremy L. Tanlimco, Eber Nolasco- Martinez, Yifei Bai, Glenn H. Fredrickson, and David M. Weld. Thermodynamic engine with a quantum degenerate working fluid. Phys. Rev. Res. , 5:L042009, Oct 2023

    2023

  4. [11]

    Interaction-enhanced quantum heat engine

    Mohamed Boubakour, Thom´ as Fogarty, and Thomas Busch. Interaction-enhanced quantum heat engine. Physical Review Research, 5(1):013088, 2023

    2023

  5. [12]

    Optimal operation of a three-level quantum heat engine and universal nature of efficiency

    Varinder Singh. Optimal operation of a three-level quantum heat engine and universal nature of efficiency. Physical Review Research, 2(4):043187, 2020

    2020

  6. [13]

    An efficient nonlinear Feshbach engine

    Jing Li, Thom´ as Fogarty, Steve Campbell, Xi Chen, and Thomas Busch. An efficient nonlinear Feshbach engine. New Journal of Physics , 20(1):015005, 2018

    2018

  7. [14]

    Shortcut-to-adiabaticity quantum tripartite Otto cycle

    Lunan Li, Hai Li, Wenli Yu, Yaming Hao, Lei Li, and Jian Zou. Shortcut-to-adiabaticity quantum tripartite Otto cycle. Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics , 54(21):215501, 2021

    2021

  8. [15]

    Davis, and L

    Vishnu Muraleedharan Sajitha, Bodhaditya Santra, 18 Matthew J. Davis, and L. A. Williamson. Quantum thermal machine regimes in the transverse-field Ising model, 2024

    2024

  9. [16]

    Optimization of asymmetric quantum Otto engine cycles

    Rahul Shastri and B Prasanna Venkatesh. Optimization of asymmetric quantum Otto engine cycles. Physical Review E, 106(2):024123, 2022

    2022

  10. [17]

    Trapped-atom Otto engine with light-induced dipole–dipole interac- tions

    Chimdessa Gashu Feyisa and H H Jen. Trapped-atom Otto engine with light-induced dipole–dipole interac- tions. New Journal of Physics , 26(9):093039, sep 2024

    2024

  11. [18]

    Unified trade-off optimiza- tion of quantum harmonic Otto engine and refrigerator

    Varinder Singh, Satnam Singh, Obinna Abah, and ¨Ozg¨ ur E M¨ ustecaplıo˘ glu. Unified trade-off optimiza- tion of quantum harmonic Otto engine and refrigerator. Physical Review E , 106(2):024137, 2022

    2022

  12. [19]

    A quantum Otto engine with finite heat baths: Energy, correlations, and degradation

    Alejandro Pozas-Kerstjens, Eric G Brown, and Karen V Hovhannisyan. A quantum Otto engine with finite heat baths: Energy, correlations, and degradation. New Journal of Physics , 20(4):043034, 2018

    2018

  13. [20]

    Thermodynamic uncertainty relation in nondegenerate and degenerate maser heat engines

    Varinder Singh, Vahid Shaghaghi, ¨Ozg¨ ur E M¨ ustecaplıo˘ glu, and Dario Rosa. Thermodynamic uncertainty relation in nondegenerate and degenerate maser heat engines. Physical Review A , 108(3):032203, 2023

    2023

  14. [21]

    Non-Markovian thermal opera- tions boosting the performance of quantum heat en- gines

    Krzysztof Ptaszy´ nski. Non-Markovian thermal opera- tions boosting the performance of quantum heat en- gines. Physical Review E , 106(1):014114, 2022

    2022

  15. [22]

    Perfor- mance bounds of nonadiabatic quantum harmonic Otto engine and refrigerator under a squeezed thermal reser- voir

    Varinder Singh and ¨Ozg¨ ur E M¨ ustecaplıo˘ glu. Perfor- mance bounds of nonadiabatic quantum harmonic Otto engine and refrigerator under a squeezed thermal reser- voir. Physical Review E , 102(6):062123, 2020

    2020

  16. [23]

    Three-level laser heat engine at optimal performance with ecological function

    Varinder Singh and Ramandeep S Johal. Three-level laser heat engine at optimal performance with ecological function. Physical Review E , 100(1):012138, 2019

    2019

  17. [24]

    Classical field simulations of a one-dimensional Bose gas as a working fluid for many- body heat engines

    Vijit Vinod Nautiyal. Classical field simulations of a one-dimensional Bose gas as a working fluid for many- body heat engines. 2024

    2024

  18. [25]

    A quantum Otto engine with shortcuts to thermalization and adiabaticity

    Ali Pedram, Serhat C Kadıo˘ glu, Alkan Kabak¸ cıo˘ glu, and ¨O E M¨ ustecaplıo˘ glu. A quantum Otto engine with shortcuts to thermalization and adiabaticity. New Jour- nal of Physics , 25(11):113014, 2023

    2023

  19. [26]

    Many-body en- hancement in a spin-chain quantum heat engine

    LA Williamson and Matthew J Davis. Many-body en- hancement in a spin-chain quantum heat engine. Phys- ical Review B , 109(2):024310, 2024

    2024

  20. [27]

    Heat current control in trapped Bose–Einstein Condensates

    Christos Charalambous, Miguel-Angel Garcia-March, Mohammad Mehboudi, and Maciej Lewenstein. Heat current control in trapped Bose–Einstein Condensates. New Journal of Physics , 21(8):083037, 2019

    2019

  21. [28]

    Bose-Fermi duality in a quantum Otto heat engine with trapped re- pulsive bosons

    Jinfu Chen, Hui Dong, and Chang-Pu Sun. Bose-Fermi duality in a quantum Otto heat engine with trapped re- pulsive bosons. Physical Review E , 98(6):062119, 2018

    2018

  22. [29]

    Quantum engines with interacting Bose-Einstein condensates

    Juli´ an Amette Estrada, Franco Mayo, Augusto J Roncaglia, and Pablo D Mininni. Quantum engines with interacting Bose-Einstein condensates. Physical Review A, 109(1):012202, 2024

    2024

  23. [30]

    Quantum simu- lations with ultracold atoms in optical lattices

    Christian Gross and Immanuel Bloch. Quantum simu- lations with ultracold atoms in optical lattices. Science, 357(6355):995–1001, 2017

    2017

  24. [31]

    Quantum simulations with ultracold quantum gases

    Immanuel Bloch, Jean Dalibard, and Sylvain Nascim- bene. Quantum simulations with ultracold quantum gases. Nature Physics, 8(4):267–276, 2012

    2012

  25. [32]

    Quantum computation and quantum simula- tion with ultracold molecules

    Simon L Cornish, Michael R Tarbutt, and Kaden RA Hazzard. Quantum computation and quantum simula- tion with ultracold molecules. Nature Physics , pages 1–11, 2024

    2024

  26. [33]

    Quantum supremacy of many-particle thermal ma- chines

    Juan Jaramillo, Mathieu Beau, and Adolfo del Campo. Quantum supremacy of many-particle thermal ma- chines. New Journal of Physics , 18(7):075019, 2016

    2016

  27. [34]

    Nonequilibrium quantum many-body rydberg atom engine

    Federico Carollo, Filippo M Gambetta, Kay Brandner, Juan P Garrahan, and Igor Lesanovsky. Nonequilibrium quantum many-body rydberg atom engine. Physical Re- view Letters, 124(17):170602, 2020

    2020

  28. [35]

    Quantum Otto en- gine with quantum correlations

    Yang Xiao, Dehua Liu, Jizhou He, Yongli Ma, Zhaoqi Wu, and Jianhui Wang. Quantum Otto en- gine with quantum correlations. Physical Review A , 108(4):042614, 2023

    2023

  29. [36]

    The power of a crit- ical heat engine

    Michele Campisi and Rosario Fazio. The power of a crit- ical heat engine. Nature communications, 7(1):11895, 2016

    2016

  30. [37]

    Quantum en- gine based on many-body localization

    Nicole Yunger Halpern, Christopher David White, Sarang Gopalakrishnan, and Gil Refael. Quantum en- gine based on many-body localization. Physical Review B, 99(2):024203, 2019

    2019

  31. [38]

    Trade-off be- tween speed and cost in shortcuts to adiabaticity

    Steve Campbell and Sebastian Deffner. Trade-off be- tween speed and cost in shortcuts to adiabaticity. Phys- ical review letters , 118(10):100601, 2017

    2017

  32. [39]

    Boosting work characteristics and overall heat-engine performance via shortcuts to adia- baticity: Quantum and classical systems

    Jiawen Deng, Qing-hai Wang, Zhihao Liu, Peter H¨ anggi, and Jiangbin Gong. Boosting work characteristics and overall heat-engine performance via shortcuts to adia- baticity: Quantum and classical systems. Physical Re- view E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 88(...

    2013

  33. [40]

    Universal trade-off relation between power and efficiency for heat engines

    Naoto Shiraishi, Keiji Saito, and Hal Tasaki. Universal trade-off relation between power and efficiency for heat engines. Physical review letters , 117(19):190601, 2016

    2016

  34. [41]

    Performance analysis of quantum harmonic Otto engine and refrigerator under a trade-off figure of merit

    Kirandeep Kaur, Shishram Rebari, and Varinder Singh. Performance analysis of quantum harmonic Otto engine and refrigerator under a trade-off figure of merit. Jour- nal of Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics , (0), 2024

    2024

  35. [42]

    Many-body quantum thermal machines

    Victor Mukherjee and Uma Divakaran. Many-body quantum thermal machines. Journal of Physics: Con- densed Matter, 33(45):454001, 2021

    2021

  36. [43]

    Shortcut-to- adiabaticity Otto engine: A twist to finite-time ther- modynamics

    Obinna Abah and Mauro Paternostro. Shortcut-to- adiabaticity Otto engine: A twist to finite-time ther- modynamics. Physical Review E , 99(2):022110, 2019

    2019

  37. [44]

    Finite-time performance of a single-ion quan- tum Otto engine

    Suman Chand, Shubhrangshu Dasgupta, and Asoka Biswas. Finite-time performance of a single-ion quan- tum Otto engine. Physical Review E , 103(3):032144, 2021

    2021

  38. [45]

    Optimal control theory for maximum power of Brownian heat engines

    Jin-Fu Chen and HT Quan. Optimal control theory for maximum power of Brownian heat engines. Physical Review E, 110(4):L042105, 2024

    2024

  39. [46]

    Current trends in finite-time thermo- dynamics

    Bjarne Andresen. Current trends in finite-time thermo- dynamics. Angewandte Chemie International Edition , 50(12):2690–2704, 2011

    2011

  40. [47]

    Geometric heat engines featuring power that grows with efficiency

    Oren Raz, Yigit Suba¸ sı, and Rami Pugatch. Geometric heat engines featuring power that grows with efficiency. Physical review letters , 116(16):160601, 2016

    2016

  41. [48]

    Transient energy excita- tion in shortcuts to adiabaticity for the time-dependent harmonic oscillator

    Xi Chen and J Gonzalo Muga. Transient energy excita- tion in shortcuts to adiabaticity for the time-dependent harmonic oscillator. Physical Review A , 82(5):053403, 2010

    2010

  42. [49]

    Shortcuts to adiabaticity: Con- cepts, methods, and applications

    David Gu´ ery-Odelin, Andreas Ruschhaupt, Anthony Kiely, Erik Torrontegui, Sofia Mart ´ ınez-Garaot, and Juan Gonzalo Muga. Shortcuts to adiabaticity: Con- cepts, methods, and applications. Reviews of Modern Physics, 91(4):045001, 2019

    2019

  43. [50]

    Not-quite-free shortcuts to adiabatic- ity

    Esteban Calzetta. Not-quite-free shortcuts to adiabatic- ity. Physical Review A , 98(3):032107, 2018

    2018

  44. [51]

    Classical and quantum thermodynamics in a non-equilibrium regime: Application to thermostatic Stirling engine

    Shoki Koyanagi and Yoshitaka Tanimura. Classical and quantum thermodynamics in a non-equilibrium regime: Application to thermostatic Stirling engine. The Jour- nal of Chemical Physics , 161(11), 2024

    2024

  45. [52]

    Im- proving performance of quantum heat engines using modified Otto cycle

    BS Revathy, Harsh Sharma, and Uma Divakaran. Im- proving performance of quantum heat engines using modified Otto cycle. Journal of Physics A: Mathemati- cal and Theoretical, 57(16):165302, 2024

    2024

  46. [53]

    Non-Markovian dynamics of a 19 quantum heat engine: out-of-equilibrium operation and thermal coupling control

    Michael Wiedmann, Juergen T Stockburger, and Joachim Ankerhold. Non-Markovian dynamics of a 19 quantum heat engine: out-of-equilibrium operation and thermal coupling control. New Journal of Physics , 22(3):033007, 2020

    2020

  47. [54]

    Quantum many-body thermal machines enabled by atom-atom correlations

    RS Watson and KV Kheruntsyan. Quantum many-body thermal machines enabled by atom-atom correlations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.05266 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  48. [55]

    An out-of-equilibrium non-Markovian quantum heat en- gine

    Marco Pezzutto, Mauro Paternostro, and Yasser Omar. An out-of-equilibrium non-Markovian quantum heat en- gine. Quantum Science and Technology , 4(2):025002, 2019

    2019

  49. [56]

    Nonequilibrium fluctuations of a quantum heat engine

    Tobias Denzler, Jonas FG Santos, Eric Lutz, and Roberto M Serra. Nonequilibrium fluctuations of a quantum heat engine. Quantum Science and Technol- ogy, 9(4):045017, 2024

    2024

  50. [57]

    Optimal tuning of a Brownian information engine operating in a nonequilibrium steady state

    Govind Paneru, Dong Yun Lee, Jong-Min Park, Jin Tae Park, Jae Dong Noh, and Hyuk Kyu Pak. Optimal tuning of a Brownian information engine operating in a nonequilibrium steady state. Physical Review E , 98(5):052119, 2018

    2018

  51. [58]

    Many-body quantum heat engines based on free fermion systems

    Vincenzo Roberto Arezzo, Davide Rossini, and Giu- lia Piccitto. Many-body quantum heat engines based on free fermion systems. Physical Review B , 109(22):224309, 2024

    2024

  52. [59]

    Nonequilibrium thermodynamics and power generation in open quantum optomechanical systems

    Paulo J Paulino, Igor Lesanovsky, and Federico Carollo. Nonequilibrium thermodynamics and power generation in open quantum optomechanical systems. Physical Re- view A , 108(2):023516, 2023

    2023

  53. [60]

    Quantum Otto cycle under strong coupling

    Mao Kaneyasu and Yoshihiko Hasegawa. Quantum Otto cycle under strong coupling. Physical Review E , 107(4):044127, 2023

    2023

  54. [61]

    Continuous measurement boosted adiabatic quantum thermal ma- chines

    Bibek Bhandari and Andrew N Jordan. Continuous measurement boosted adiabatic quantum thermal ma- chines. Physical Review Research, 4(3):033103, 2022

    2022

  55. [62]

    Quantum limit to nonequilibrium heat-engine perfor- mance imposed by strong system-reservoir coupling

    David Newman, Florian Mintert, and Ahsan Nazir. Quantum limit to nonequilibrium heat-engine perfor- mance imposed by strong system-reservoir coupling. Physical Review E , 101(5):052129, 2020

    2020

  56. [63]

    Esteve, J.-B

    J. Esteve, J.-B. Trebbia, T. Schumm, A. Aspect, C. I. Westbrook, and I. Bouchoule. Observations of Density Fluctuations in an Elongated Bose Gas: Ideal Gas and Quasicondensate Regimes. Phys. Rev. Lett., 96:130403, Apr 2006

    2006

  57. [64]

    Finite-temperature hydrodynamics for one-dimensional Bose gases: Breathing-mode oscil- lations as a case study.Physical Review A, 94(5):051602, 2016

    Isabelle Bouchoule, SS Szigeti, MJ Davis, and KV Kheruntsyan. Finite-temperature hydrodynamics for one-dimensional Bose gases: Breathing-mode oscil- lations as a case study.Physical Review A, 94(5):051602, 2016

    2016

  58. [65]

    K. V. Kheruntsyan, D. M. Gangardt, P. D. Drummond, and G. V. Shlyapnikov. Finite-temperature correlations and density profiles of an inhomogeneous interacting one-dimensional Bose gas. Phys. Rev. A , 71:053615, May 2005

    2005

  59. [66]

    Bouchoule, N

    I. Bouchoule, N. J. van Druten, and C. I. Westbrook. Atom Chips and One-Dimensional Bose Gases . John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2011

    2011

  60. [67]

    Non-equilibrium co- herence dynamics in one-dimensional Bose gases

    S Hofferberth, Igor Lesanovsky, B Fischer, Thorsten Schumm, and J¨ org Schmiedmayer. Non-equilibrium co- herence dynamics in one-dimensional Bose gases. Na- ture, 449(7160):324–327, 2007

    2007

  61. [68]

    A. H. van Amerongen, J. J. P. van Es, P. Wicke, K. V. Kheruntsyan, and N. J. van Druten. Yang-Yang Thermodynamics on an Atom Chip. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 100:090402, Mar 2008

    2008

  62. [69]

    Laburthe Tolra, K

    B. Laburthe Tolra, K. M. O’Hara, J. H. Huckans, W. D. Phillips, S. L. Rolston, and J. V. Porto. Observation of Reduced Three-Body Recombination in a Correlated 1D Degenerate Bose Gas. Phys. Rev. Lett., 92:190401, May 2004

    2004

  63. [70]

    and Esslinger, Tilman

    Exploring Phase Coherence in a 2D Lattice of Bose- Einstein Condensates, author = Greiner, Markus and Bloch, Immanuel and Mandel, Olaf and H¨ ansch, Theodor W. and Esslinger, Tilman. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 87:160405, Oct 2001

    2001

  64. [71]

    Exciting Collective Oscillations in a Trapped 1D Gas

    Henning Moritz, Thilo St¨ oferle, Michael K¨ ohl, and Tilman Esslinger. Exciting Collective Oscillations in a Trapped 1D Gas. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 91:250402, Dec 2003

    2003

  65. [72]

    Kr¨ uger, S

    P. Kr¨ uger, S. Hofferberth, I. E. Mazets, I. Lesanovsky, and J. Schmiedmayer. Weakly Interacting Bose Gas in the One-Dimensional Limit. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 105:265302, Dec 2010

    2010

  66. [73]

    Toshiya Kinoshita, Trevor Wenger, and David S. Weiss. Observation of a One-Dimensional Tonks-Girardeau Gas. Science, 305(5687):1125–1128, 2004

    2004

  67. [74]

    Toshiya Kinoshita, Trevor Wenger, and David S. Weiss. Local Pair Correlations in One-Dimensional Bose Gases. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 95:190406, Nov 2005

    2005

  68. [75]

    Olshanii

    M. Olshanii. Atomic Scattering in the Presence of an External Confinement and a Gas of Impenetrable Bosons. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 81:938–941, Aug 1998

    1998

  69. [76]

    Armijo, T

    J. Armijo, T. Jacqmin, K. Kheruntsyan, and I. Bou- choule. Mapping out the quasicondensate transition through the dimensional crossover from one to three di- mensions. Phys. Rev. A , 83:021605, Feb 2011

    2011

  70. [77]

    R. Shah, T. J. Barrett, A. Colcelli, F. Oruˇ cevi´ c, A. Trombettoni, and P. Kr¨ uger. Probing the Degree of Coherence through the Full 1D to 3D Crossover. Phys. Rev. Lett., 130:123401, Mar 2023

    2023

  71. [78]

    Feshbach resonances in ultracold gases

    Cheng Chin, Rudolf Grimm, Paul Julienne, and Eite Tiesinga. Feshbach resonances in ultracold gases. Rev. Mod. Phys., 82:1225–1286, Apr 2010

    2010

  72. [79]

    Mark, Johann G

    Elmar Haller, Mattias Gustavsson, Manfred J. Mark, Johann G. Danzl, Russell Hart, Guido Pupillo, and Hanns-Christoph N¨ agerl. Realization of an Excited, Strongly Correlated Quantum Gas Phase. Science, 325(5945):1224–1227, 2009

    2009

  73. [80]

    Mark, Russell Hart, Johann G

    Elmar Haller, Manfred J. Mark, Russell Hart, Johann G. Danzl, Lukas Reichs¨ ollner, Vladimir Melezhik, Peter Schmelcher, and Hanns-Christoph N¨ agerl. Confinement-Induced Resonances in Low- Dimensional Quantum Systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 104:153203, Apr 2010

    2010

  74. [81]

    K. V. Kheruntsyan, D. M. Gangardt, P. D. Drummond, and G. V. Shlyapnikov. Pair Correlations in a Finite- Temperature 1D Bose Gas . Phys. Rev. Lett., 91:040403, Jul 2003. 20

    2003

  75. [82]

    Lieb and Werner Liniger

    Elliott H. Lieb and Werner Liniger. Exact Analysis of an Interacting Bose Gas. I. The General Solution and the Ground State . Phys. Rev. , 130:1605–1616, May 1963

    1963

  76. [83]

    C. N. Yang and C. P. Yang. Thermodynamics of a One- Dimensional System of Bosons with Repulsive Delta- Function Interaction. Journal of Mathematical Physics , 10(7):1115–1122, 1969

    1969

  77. [84]

    Maxwell relation between entropy and atom-atom pair correlation

    Raymon S Watson, Caleb Coleman, and Karen V Kheruntsyan. Maxwell relation between entropy and atom-atom pair correlation. Physical Review Letters , 133(10):100403, 2024

    2024

  78. [85]

    Ana- lytic thermodynamic properties of the Lieb-Liniger gas

    M Kerr, G De Rosi, and K Kheruntsyan. Ana- lytic thermodynamic properties of the Lieb-Liniger gas. arXiv:2404.06092, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  79. [86]

    P. D. Drummond, P. Deuar, and K. V. Kheruntsyan. Canonical Bose Gas Simulations with Stochastic Gauges. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 92:040405, Jan 2004

    2004

  80. [87]

    Dy- namics of thermalization of two tunnel-coupled one- dimensional quasicondensates

    F A Bayocboc Jr, MJ Davis, and KV Kheruntsyan. Dy- namics of thermalization of two tunnel-coupled one- dimensional quasicondensates. Physical Review A , 106(2):023320, 2022

    2022

  81. [88]

    Blakie, A.S

    P.B. Blakie, A.S. Bradley, M.J. Davis, R.J. Ballagh, and C.W. Gardiner. Dynamics and statistical mechanics of ultra-cold Bose gases using c-field techniques . Advances in Physics , 57(5):363–455, 2008

    2008

  82. [89]

    Dynamics and statistical mechanics of ultra-cold Bose gases using c-field techniques

    P Blair Blakie, AS Bradley, MJ Davis, RJ Ballagh, and CW Gardiner. Dynamics and statistical mechanics of ultra-cold Bose gases using c-field techniques. Advances in Physics , 57(5):363–455, 2008

    2008

  83. [90]

    What is a quantum shock wave? Physical Review Letters , 125(18):180401, 2020

    SA Simmons, F A Bayocboc Jr, JC Pillay, D Co- las, IP McCulloch, and KV Kheruntsyan. What is a quantum shock wave? Physical Review Letters , 125(18):180401, 2020

    2020

  84. [91]

    Thermalization of a quantum Newton’s cradle in a one-dimensional quasicondensate

    Kieran F Thomas, Matthew J Davis, and Karen V Kheruntsyan. Thermalization of a quantum Newton’s cradle in a one-dimensional quasicondensate. Physical Review A, 103(2):023315, 2021

    2021

  85. [92]

    Fre- quency beating and damping of breathing oscillations of a harmonically trapped one-dimensional quasiconden- sate

    Francis A Bayocboc Jr and Karen V Kheruntsyan. Fre- quency beating and damping of breathing oscillations of a harmonically trapped one-dimensional quasiconden- sate. Comptes Rendus. Physique , 24(S3):1–24, 2023

    2023

  86. [93]

    D. S. Petrov, G. V. Shlyapnikov, and J. T. M. Walraven. Regimes of Quantum Degeneracy in Trapped 1D Gases. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 85:3745–3749, Oct 2000

    2000

  87. [94]

    Myers, Obinna Abah, and Sebastian Deffner

    Nathan M. Myers, Obinna Abah, and Sebastian Deffner. Quantum thermodynamic devices: From theoretical proposals to experimental reality. A VS Quantum Sci- ence, 4(2):027101, 04 2022

    2022

  88. [95]

    An introduction to thermal physics

    Daniel V Schroeder. An introduction to thermal physics. Oxford University Press, 2020

    2020

  89. [96]

    Observa- tion of a 2D Bose gas: from thermal to quasicondensate to superfluid

    Pierre Clade, Changhyun Ryu, Anand Ramanathan, Kristian Helmerson, and William D Phillips. Observa- tion of a 2D Bose gas: from thermal to quasicondensate to superfluid. Physical review letters , 102(17):170401, 2009

    2009

  90. [97]

    Extension of Bo- goliubov theory to quasicondensates

    Christophe Mora and Yvan Castin. Extension of Bo- goliubov theory to quasicondensates. Phys. Rev. A , 67:053615, May 2003

    2003

  91. [98]

    Condensation and quasicondensation in an elon- gated three-dimensional Bose gas

    Michael C Garrett, Tod M Wright, and Matthew J Davis. Condensation and quasicondensation in an elon- gated three-dimensional Bose gas. Physical Review A , 87(6):063611, 2013

    2013

  92. [99]

    Stochastic pro- jected Gross-Pitaevskii equation

    SJ Rooney, PB Blakie, and AS Bradley. Stochastic pro- jected Gross-Pitaevskii equation. Physical Review A , 86(5):053634, 2012

    2012

  93. [100]

    Kheruntsyan, and Isabelle Bouchoule

    Thibaut Jacqmin, Julien Armijo, Tarik Berrada, Karen V. Kheruntsyan, and Isabelle Bouchoule. Sub- Poissonian Fluctuations in a 1D Bose Gas: From the Quantum Quasicondensate to the Strongly Interacting Regime. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 106:230405, Jun 2011

    2011

  94. [101]

    Monitoring squeezed collective modes of a one-dimensional Bose gas after an interaction quench using density-ripple analysis

    Max Schemmer, Aisling Johnson, and Isabelle Bou- choule. Monitoring squeezed collective modes of a one-dimensional Bose gas after an interaction quench using density-ripple analysis. Physical Review A , 98(4):043604, 2018

    2018

  95. [102]

    The stochastic gross– pitaevskii equation: Ii

    CW Gardiner and MJ Davis. The stochastic gross– pitaevskii equation: Ii. Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics , 36(23):4731, 2003

    2003

  96. [103]

    Projected Gross-Pitaevskii equation for harmonically confined Bose gases at finite temperature

    P Blair Blakie and Matthew J Davis. Projected Gross-Pitaevskii equation for harmonically confined Bose gases at finite temperature. Physical Review A , 72(6):063608, 2005

    2005

  97. [104]

    Decay of a quantum vortex: Test of nonequilibrium the- ories for warm Bose-Einstein condensates

    SJ Rooney, AS Bradley, and PB Blakie. Decay of a quantum vortex: Test of nonequilibrium the- ories for warm Bose-Einstein condensates. Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics , 81(2):023630, 2010

    2010

  98. [105]

    Quantum quench in a harmonically trapped one- dimensional Bose gas

    Mario Collura, M´ arton Kormos, and Pasquale Cal- abrese. Quantum quench in a harmonically trapped one- dimensional Bose gas. Physical Review A, 97(3):033609, 2018

    2018

  99. [106]

    Low- dimensional stochastic projected Gross-Pitaevskii equa- tion

    AS Bradley, SJ Rooney, and RG McDonald. Low- dimensional stochastic projected Gross-Pitaevskii equa- tion. Physical Review A , 92(3):033631, 2015

    2015

  100. [107]

    Interaction quench in a trapped 1D Bose gas

    Paolo P Mazza, Mario Collura, M´ arton Kormos, and Pasquale Calabrese. Interaction quench in a trapped 1D Bose gas. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2014(11):P11016, 2014

    2014

  101. [108]

    demonstrates that, under certain conditions, in an ideal, reversible scenario, a QTE with a degenerate, non- interacting quantum gas in a box potential can achieve a maximum efficiency of one, i.e., ηrev → 1. Since, in ultracold atomic gases, heat and particle transports are i...

  102. [109]

    Observation of Fesh- bach resonances in a Bose–Einstein condensate

    S Inouye, MR Andrews, J Stenger, H-J Miesner, Dan M Stamper-Kurn, and W Ketterle. Observation of Fesh- bach resonances in a Bose–Einstein condensate. Nature, 392(6672):151–154, 1998

    1998

  103. [110]

    Strongly en- hanced inelastic collisions in a Bose-Einstein conden- sate near Feshbach resonances

    J Stenger, S Inouye, MR Andrews, H-J Miesner, DM Stamper-Kurn, and W Ketterle. Strongly en- hanced inelastic collisions in a Bose-Einstein conden- sate near Feshbach resonances. Physical review letters , 82(12):2422, 1999

    1999

  104. [111]

    Quantum thermochemical engines

    Ugo Marzolino. Quantum thermochemical engines. Physical Review Applied, 21(3):034003, 2024

    2024

  105. [112]

    Reservoir interactions of a vortex in a trapped three-dimensional Bose-Einstein condensate

    SJ Rooney, AJ Allen, U Z¨ ulicke, NP Proukakis, and AS Bradley. Reservoir interactions of a vortex in a trapped three-dimensional Bose-Einstein condensate. Physical Review A , 93(6):063603, 2016

    2016

  106. [113]

    Spontaneous vortices in the formation of Bose–Einstein condensates

    Chad N Weiler, Tyler W Neely, David R Scherer, Ash- ton S Bradley, Matthew J Davis, and Brian P Anderson. Spontaneous vortices in the formation of Bose–Einstein condensates. Nature, 455(7215):948–951, 2008

    2008

  107. [114]

    Persistent-current formation in a high-temperature Bose-Einstein condensate: An experimental test for classical-field theory

    SJ Rooney, TW Neely, BP Anderson, and AS Bradley. Persistent-current formation in a high-temperature Bose-Einstein condensate: An experimental test for classical-field theory. Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics , 88(6):063620, 2013

    2013

  108. [115]

    Heat engines operate by converting heat into mechan- ical work, whereas chemical engines generate mechani- cal work from chemical energy [136]. Chemical engines can operate through various mechanisms, including uti- lizing chemical potential gradients to induce mechani- cal mo...

  109. [116]

    Physical Review A , 110(6):062612, 2024

    Critical quantum heat engines based on a homoge- neous weakly interacting Bose gas, author=Luo, Shaolin and He, Xian and Guo, Shouhui and Ma, Yongli and He, Jizhou and Wang, Jianhui. Physical Review A , 110(6):062612, 2024

    2024

  110. [117]

    Thermodynamic geometry of ideal quan- tum gases: a general framework and a geometric picture of BEC-enhanced heat engines

    Joshua Eglinton, Tuomas Pyh¨ aranta, Keiji Saito, and Kay Brandner. Thermodynamic geometry of ideal quan- tum gases: a general framework and a geometric picture of BEC-enhanced heat engines. New Journal of Physics , 25(4):043014, 2023

    2023

  111. [118]

    A thermoelectric heat engine with ultracold atoms

    Jean-Philippe Brantut, Charles Grenier, Jakob Meineke, David Stadler, Sebastian Krinner, Corinna Kollath, Tilman Esslinger, and Antoine Georges. A thermoelectric heat engine with ultracold atoms. Science, 342(6159):713–715, 2013

    2013

  112. [119]

    Breakdown of the Wiedemann–Franz law in a unitary Fermi gas

    Dominik Husmann, Martin Lebrat, Samuel H¨ ausler, Jean-Philippe Brantut, Laura Corman, and Tilman Esslinger. Breakdown of the Wiedemann–Franz law in a unitary Fermi gas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(34):8563–8568, 2018

    2018

  113. [120]

    Beweis des adiabaten- satzes

    Max Born and Vladimir Fock. Beweis des adiabaten- satzes. Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik, 51(3-4):165–180, 1928

    1928

  114. [121]

    Shortcuts to adiabaticity by counterdiabatic driving

    Adolfo Del Campo. Shortcuts to adiabaticity by counterdiabatic driving. Physical review letters , 111(10):100502, 2013

    2013

  115. [123]

    A new performance criterion for heat en- gines: efficient power

    T Yilmaz. A new performance criterion for heat en- gines: efficient power. Journal of the Energy Institute , 79(1):38–41, 2006

    2006

  116. [124]

    Low- dissipation Carnot-like heat engines at maximum effi- cient power

    Varinder Singh and Ramandeep S Johal. Low- dissipation Carnot-like heat engines at maximum effi- cient power. Physical Review E , 98(6):062132, 2018

    2018

  117. [125]

    In all cases, the interaction strength was quenched from gc = 1.27 × 10−38 J · m to gh = 1.8 × gc following Eq.(4); during expansion, it was quenched back togc per Eq.(7)

    The initial temperature of the working fluid, in thermal equilibrium with the cold reservoir, was kept constant at Tc = 86.3 nK, with an initial particle count Nc ≃ 2235 obtained using a chemical potential of µ = 7.95 × 10−31 J. In all cases, the interaction strength was quenc...

  118. [126]

    Breathing mode in the Bose-Hubbard chain with a harmonic trapping potential

    Wladimir Tschischik, Roderich Moessner, and Masudul Haque. Breathing mode in the Bose-Hubbard chain with a harmonic trapping potential. Physical Review A, 88(6):063636, 2013

    2013

  119. [127]

    Irreversibility in a unitary finite-rate protocol: the concept of internal friction

    Sel¸ cuk C ¸ akmak, Ferdi Altintas, and ¨Ozg¨ ur E M¨ ustecaplıo˘ glu. Irreversibility in a unitary finite-rate protocol: the concept of internal friction. Physica Scripta, 91(7):075101, 2016

    2016

  120. [128]

    Quench-induced breathing mode of one-dimensional Bose gases

    Bess Fang, Giuseppe Carleo, Aisling Johnson, and Is- abelle Bouchoule. Quench-induced breathing mode of one-dimensional Bose gases. Physical review letters , 113(3):035301, 2014

    2014

  121. [129]

    Generalized hydrodynamics in strongly interacting 1D Bose gases

    Neel Malvania, Yicheng Zhang, Yuan Le, Jerome Dubail, Marcos Rigol, and David S Weiss. Generalized hydrodynamics in strongly interacting 1D Bose gases. Science, 373(6559):1129–1133, 2021

    2021

  122. [130]

    Generalized hy- drodynamics in the one-dimensional Bose gas: theory and experiments

    Isabelle Bouchoule and J´ erˆ ome Dubail. Generalized hy- drodynamics in the one-dimensional Bose gas: theory and experiments. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: The- ory and Experiment , 2022(1):014003, 2022

    2022

  123. [131]

    Raymon S. Watson. Quantum thermodynamics of inte- grable and near-integrable atomic systems, 2024

    2024

  124. [132]

    Quan- tum measurement cooling

    Lorenzo Buffoni, Andrea Solfanelli, Paola Verrucchi, Alessandro Cuccoli, and Michele Campisi. Quan- tum measurement cooling. Physical review letters , 122(7):070603, 2019

    2019

  125. [133]

    Quantum ther- mal machines and batteries

    Sourav Bhattacharjee and Amit Dutta. Quantum ther- mal machines and batteries. The European Physical Journal B , 94:1–42, 2021

    2021

  126. [134]

    R´ eflexions sur la puissance motrice du feu

    Sadi Carnot. R´ eflexions sur la puissance motrice du feu. Number 26. Vrin, 1978

    1978

  127. [135]

    The unlikely Carnot efficiency

    Gatien Verley, Massimiliano Esposito, Tim Willaert, and Christian Van den Broeck. The unlikely Carnot efficiency. Nature communications, 5(1):4721, 2014

    2014

  128. [136]

    Carnot efficiency: why? Phys- ica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , 392(17):3513–3517, 2013

    Umberto Lucia. Carnot efficiency: why? Phys- ica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , 392(17):3513–3517, 2013

    2013

  129. [137]

    Quantum mechanical Carnot engine

    Carl M Bender, Dorje C Brody, and Bernhard K Meis- ter. Quantum mechanical Carnot engine. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General , 33(24):4427, 2000

    2000

  130. [138]

    Numerical method for the stochastic projected Gross-Pitaevskii equation

    SJ Rooney, PB Blakie, and AS Bradley. Numerical method for the stochastic projected Gross-Pitaevskii equation. Physical Review E , 89(1):013302, 2014

    2014

  131. [139]

    Chemical engines: driving systems away from equilibrium through catalyst reaction cycles

    Shuntaro Amano, Stefan Borsley, David A Leigh, and Zhanhu Sun. Chemical engines: driving systems away from equilibrium through catalyst reaction cycles. Na- ture Nanotechnology, 16(10):1057–1067, 2021

    2021

  132. [140]

    Per- formance characteristic of isothermal chemical engines

    Lingen Chen, Fengrui Sun, Chih Wu, and Jun Yu. Per- formance characteristic of isothermal chemical engines. Energy conversion and management , 38(18):1841–1846, 1997

    1997

  133. [141]

    Energy transduction of isother- mal ratchets: Generic aspects and specific examples close to and far from equilibrium

    Andrea Parmeggiani, Frank J¨ ulicher, Armand Ajdari, and Jacques Prost. Energy transduction of isother- mal ratchets: Generic aspects and specific examples close to and far from equilibrium. Physical Review E , 60(2):2127, 1999

    1999

  134. [142]

    Ef- ficiency at maximum power of a chemical engine

    Hans Hooyberghs, Bart Cleuren, Alberto Salazar, Joseph O Indekeu, and Christian Van den Broeck. Ef- ficiency at maximum power of a chemical engine. The Journal of chemical physics , 139(13), 2013

    2013

  135. [143]

    Modeling molecular motors

    Frank J¨ ulicher, Armand Ajdari, and Jacques Prost. Modeling molecular motors. Reviews of Modern Physics, 69(4):1269, 1997

    1997

  136. [144]

    Molecular mo- tors

    Manfred Schliwa and G¨ unther Woehlke. Molecular mo- tors. Nature, 422(6933):759–765, 2003

    2003

  137. [145]

    Artificial Brow- nian motors: Controlling transport on the nanoscale

    Peter H¨ anggi and Fabio Marchesoni. Artificial Brow- nian motors: Controlling transport on the nanoscale. Reviews of Modern Physics , 81(1):387, 2009

    2009

  138. [146]

    Thermodynamics of chemical Marangoni-driven engines

    Rouslan Krechetnikov. Thermodynamics of chemical Marangoni-driven engines. Soft Matter , 13(28):4931– 4950, 2017

    2017

  139. [147]

    Efficiency at maximum power of thermochemical engines with near- 22 independent particles

    Xiaoguang Luo, Nian Liu, and Teng Qiu. Efficiency at maximum power of thermochemical engines with near- 22 independent particles. Physical Review E, 93(3):032125, 2016

    2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.