Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 2 minor 65 references

Nondipole Contributions to Attosecond Chiral Photoionization Asymmetries

T0 review · 1 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-07-02 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Non-dipole effects from photon momentum transfer modify the magnitude and phase of electron wave packets in attosecond chiral photoionization and can reverse observed asymmetries via pathway interference.

desk verdict Non-dipole effects can reverse chiral asymmetries in attosecond two-photon PECD, and racemic mixtures offer a way to subtract them. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.00598 v1 pith:V6DVSDEE submitted 2026-07-01 physics.atom-ph

Zheming Zhou , Yang Li , Yueming Zhou , Peixiang Lu This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.atom-ph
keywords photoelectroncirculardichroismnon-dipoleeffectsattosecondionizationchiralasymmetrytwo-photoninterferometrymolecularchiralityelectronwavepacket
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper shows that calculations beyond the dipole approximation reveal non-dipole contributions that change both the strength and the timing of electrons emitted from chiral molecules during one- and two-photon ionization. In two-photon interferometry the interference between ionization pathways amplifies these contributions enough to flip the sign of the apparent chiral asymmetry. The work identifies that the non-dipole part remains the same regardless of molecular handedness, so a measurement on a racemic mixture supplies a background that can be subtracted to recover the purely chirality-driven signal. This separation matters because attosecond PECD is intended to track chiral electron dynamics, and unremoved non-dipole terms would otherwise distort those dynamics.

What carries the argument

The separation principle that extracts the chirality-induced asymmetry by subtracting the non-dipole background measured on a racemic mixture.

What would settle it

An experiment that measures the forward-backward asymmetry on a racemic mixture and finds it does not equal the non-dipole part isolated from enantiopure samples, or that fails to observe the predicted reversal of asymmetry in two-photon interferometry.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Calculations beyond the dipole approximation, interpreted with perturbation theory, show that non-dipole effects modify not only the magnitude but also the phase of the emitted electron wave packet. In two-photon interferometry, pathway interference amplifies the non-dipole response and can reverse the apparent chiral asymmetry. The non-dipole component is insensitive to enantiomeric handedness and can therefore be obtained from a racemic mixture; subtracting this background isolates the purely chirality-induced asymmetry.

Load-bearing premise

The non-dipole component of the asymmetry is insensitive to the handedness of the enantiomer.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Non-dipole contributions must be subtracted to obtain accurate chiral asymmetries in both one- and two-photon attosecond PECD.
  • Two-photon interferometry measurements can exhibit reversed chiral signals when non-dipole pathway interference dominates.
  • Racemic samples supply a direct experimental background for isolating the handedness-dependent component.
  • The phase shift induced by non-dipole terms alters the timing information extracted from electron wave packets.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same subtraction approach could apply to other chiral-sensitive observables that rely on angular distributions.
  • Phase modifications imply measurable shifts in emission timing that attosecond streaking or RABBITT techniques might detect directly.
  • Existing attosecond PECD data sets recorded under dipole-only assumptions may need reanalysis once non-dipole backgrounds are quantified for the same molecules.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that calculations beyond the dipole approximation for one- and two-photon ionization of chiral molecules show nondipole effects modifying both magnitude and phase of the emitted electron wave packet. In two-photon interferometry, pathway interference amplifies the nondipole response and can reverse apparent chiral asymmetry. A separation principle is identified: the nondipole component is insensitive to enantiomeric handedness and extractable from a racemic mixture, allowing subtraction to isolate the purely chirality-induced asymmetry in attosecond PECD measurements.

Significance. If the calculations and separation principle hold, the work is significant for attosecond chiral spectroscopy and molecular dynamics, as it offers a practical route to disentangle photon-momentum nondipole contributions from true PECD signals. The perturbation-theory interpretation of phase modifications and the handedness-insensitivity result are strengths that could enable more accurate extraction of chiral electron dynamics.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract (separation principle paragraph)] The separation principle (nondipole component insensitive to handedness, extractable from racemic mixture) is load-bearing for the central claim of isolating chirality-induced asymmetry, yet the abstract provides no explicit symmetry argument, calculation, or numerical demonstration of this insensitivity; the full manuscript must supply this evidence or the subtraction method remains unverified.
minor comments (2)
  1. Computational methods for the beyond-dipole calculations (basis sets, gauge choice, molecular systems studied) are not described in the abstract and should be detailed early in the manuscript for reproducibility.
  2. The abstract states that nondipole effects 'can reverse the apparent chiral asymmetry' but does not specify the conditions or magnitude; a quantitative example or figure reference would strengthen the claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment and recommendation of minor revision. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract (separation principle paragraph)] The separation principle (nondipole component insensitive to handedness, extractable from racemic mixture) is load-bearing for the central claim of isolating chirality-induced asymmetry, yet the abstract provides no explicit symmetry argument, calculation, or numerical demonstration of this insensitivity; the full manuscript must supply this evidence or the subtraction method remains unverified.

    Authors: The full manuscript supplies the requested evidence. Section II derives the symmetry argument from the form of the nondipole operator (linear in photon momentum), which is invariant under enantiomer exchange and therefore yields identical contributions for both handednesses. Section IV then presents explicit calculations confirming that the nondipole asymmetry parameter is numerically the same for the (R) and (S) enantiomers and can be extracted directly from the racemate. To make this explicit already in the abstract, we will add one sentence referencing the symmetry argument and the numerical verification. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The derivation relies on explicit calculations beyond the dipole approximation, interpreted via perturbation theory, to establish that non-dipole effects alter both magnitude and phase of the electron wave packet. The separation principle follows directly from the stated symmetry property that non-dipole contributions are handedness-insensitive, allowing extraction from a racemic mixture; this is presented as an identified consequence of the calculations rather than a fitted parameter or self-referential definition. No self-citation chains, ansatz smuggling, or reductions of predictions to inputs by construction appear in the provided derivation steps. The central claims remain independent of the target observables.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters or invented entities are mentioned in the abstract. The key assumptions are the validity of the non-dipole calculations and the handedness independence.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption The non-dipole effects can be calculated beyond the dipole approximation using perturbation theory.
    This is the basis for the calculations mentioned in the abstract.
  • domain assumption Non-dipole contributions are independent of molecular handedness.
    This is explicitly used for the separation principle.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Nondipole Contributions to Attosecond Chiral Photoionization Asymmetries." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/V6DVSDEE

@misc{pith2026260700598,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Nondipole Contributions to Attosecond Chiral Photoionization Asymmetries},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/V6DVSDEE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.00598}
}
read the original abstract

Photoelectron circular dichroism (PECD) reads molecular chirality from forward-backward asymmetries in photoelectron emission, but the same observable can also contain non-dipole contributions from photon momentum transfer. Here we show that such contributions can reshape attosecond PECD measurements in both one- and two-photon ionization of chiral molecules. Calculations beyond the dipole approximation, interpreted with perturbation theory, reveal that non-dipole effects modify not only the magnitude but also the phase of the emitted electron wave packet. In two-photon interferometry, pathway interference amplifies the non-dipole response and can reverse the apparent chiral asymmetry. We further identify a practical separation principle: the non-dipole component is insensitive to enantiomeric handedness and can therefore be obtained from a racemic mixture. Subtracting this background isolates the purely chirality-induced asymmetry, enabling more accurate measurements of chiral electron dynamics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.00598 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Circularly polarized RABBITT scheme for chi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Difference between the FBA including non-dipole [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. (a)–(e) Angle-resolved FBA for different sidebands i [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Forward-backward differential time delay for both [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Here β (nd) lm is the non-dipole con- tribution, whereas β (chiral) lm is the chiral contribution and changes sign when the enantiomer is reversed

    can therefore be separated, to leading order, into non-dipole and chiral contributions, βlm = β (nd) lm ± β (chiral) lm . Here β (nd) lm is the non-dipole con- tribution, whereas β (chiral) lm is the chiral contribution and changes sign when the enantiomer is reversed. Equa- tion (

    work page

  2. [2]

    then gives FBA = 2 ∑ l=odd β (nd) lm Ylm∑ l=even βlmYlm    ∆FBA + 2 ∑ l=odd β (chiral) lm Ylm∑ l=even βlmYlm    FBA(chiral) , (4) which allows the measured FBA to be decomposed into (a) FBA = FBAnd - FBAd -4 -2 0 2 4 FBA (%) HH23 (+) HH23 (-) HH23 (mix) HH27 (+) HH27 (-) HH27 (mix) HH31 (+) HH31 (-) HH31 (mix) HH35 (+) HH35 (-) HH35 (mix) HH39 (+)...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Theory of the angular distribution for ejection of photoelectrons from optically active molecule s and molecular negative ions

    Burke Ritchie. Theory of the angular distribution for ejection of photoelectrons from optically active molecule s and molecular negative ions. ii. Phys. Rev. A, 14:359–362, Jul 1976

    work page 1976

  4. [4]

    Two decades of imaging photoelectron circular dichroism: from first prin- ciples to future perspectives

    Chris Sparling and Dave Townsend. Two decades of imaging photoelectron circular dichroism: from first prin- ciples to future perspectives. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. , 27:2888–2907, 2025

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    Nakanishi, N

    K. Nakanishi, N. Berova, and R. W. Woody. K. nakan- ishi, n. berova, r.w. woody (eds.): Circular dichroism, principles and applications, vch, weinheim, new york, cambridge, isbn 1-56081-618-x, 1994. Berichte der Bun- sengesellschaft f¨ ur physikalische Chemie, 99(2):230–230, 1995

    work page 1994

  6. [6]

    Photoelectron circular dichroism of the ran - domly oriented chiral molecules glyceraldehyde and lactic acid

    Ivan Powis. Photoelectron circular dichroism of the ran - domly oriented chiral molecules glyceraldehyde and lactic acid. The Journal of Chemical Physics , 112(1):301–310, 01 2000

    work page 2000

  7. [7]

    B¨ owering, T

    N. B¨ owering, T. Lischke, B. Schmidtke, N. M¨ uller, T. Khalil, and U. Heinzmann. Asymmetry in photoelec- 6 tron emission from chiral molecules induced by circularly polarized light. Phys. Rev. Lett., 86:1187–1190, Feb 2001

    work page 2001

  8. [8]

    Ordonez and Olga Smirnova

    Andres F. Ordonez and Olga Smirnova. Generalized per- spective on chiral measurements without magnetic inter- actions. Phys. Rev. A , 98:063428, Dec 2018

    work page 2018

Show all 65 references
  1. [9]

    Fehre, N

    K. Fehre, N. M. Novikovskiy, S. Grundmann, G. Ka- stirke, S. Eckart, F. Trinter, J. Rist, A. Hartung, D. Tra- bert, C. Janke, G. Nalin, M. Pitzer, S. Zeller, F. Wie- gandt, M. Weller, M. Kircher, M. Hofmann, L. Ph. H. Schmidt, A. Knie, A. Hans, L. Ben Ltaief, A. Ehresmann, R. ...

    2021

  2. [10]

    Heger and Daniel M

    Marec W. Heger and Daniel M. Reich. Tracking chiral- ity in photoelectron circular dichroism. Phys. Rev. Res. , 7:L012047, Feb 2025

    2025

  3. [11]

    Photoelectron circular dichroism of chiral molecules studied with a continuum-state-corrected strong-field approximation

    Ingo Dreissigacker and Manfred Lein. Photoelectron circular dichroism of chiral molecules studied with a continuum-state-corrected strong-field approximation. Phys. Rev. A , 89:053406, May 2014

    2014

  4. [12]

    Uni- versality of photoelectron circular dichroism in the pho- toionization of chiral molecules

    S Beaulieu, A Ferr´ e, R G´ eneaux, R Canonge, D Descamps, B Fabre, N Fedorov, F L´ egar´ e, S Petit, T Ruchon, V Blanchet, Y Mairesse, and B Pons. Uni- versality of photoelectron circular dichroism in the pho- toionization of chiral molecules. New Journal of Physics , 18(10):...

    2016

  5. [13]

    Beaulieu, A

    S. Beaulieu, A. Comby, A. Clergerie, J. Caillat, D. Descamps, N. Dudovich, B. Fabre, R. G´ eneaux, F. L´ egar´ e, S. Petit, B. Pons, G. Porat, T. Ruchon, R. Ta ¨ ıeb, V. Blanchet, and Y. Mairesse. Attosecond- resolved photoionization of chiral molecules. Science, 358(6368):128...

    2017

  6. [14]

    Comby, E

    A. Comby, E. Bloch, C. M. M. Bond, D. Descamps, J. Miles, S. Petit, S. Rozen, J. B. Greenwood, V. Blanchet, and Y. Mairesse. Real-time determination of enantiomeric and isomeric content using photoelectron elliptical dichroism. Nature Communications, 9(1):5212, Dec 2018

    2018

  7. [15]

    Demekhin, Anton N

    Philipp V. Demekhin, Anton N. Artemyev, Alexander Kastner, and Thomas Baumert. Photoelectron circular dichroism with two overlapping laser pulses of carrier fre- quencies ω and 2 ω linearly polarized in two mutually or- thogonal directions. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 121:253201, Dec 2018

    2018

  8. [16]

    Fehre, S

    K. Fehre, S. Eckart, M. Kunitski, C. Janke, D. Trabert, J. Rist, M. Weller, A. Hartung, M. Pitzer, L. Ph. H. Schmidt, T. Jahnke, R. D¨ orner, and M. S. Sch¨ offler. Angular streaking in strong field ionization of chiral molecules. Phys. Rev. Res. , 1:033045, Oct 2019

    2019

  9. [17]

    Bloch, S

    E. Bloch, S. Larroque, S. Rozen, S. Beaulieu, A. Comby, S. Beauvarlet, D. Descamps, B. Fabre, S. Petit, R. Ta ¨ ıeb, A. J. Uzan, V. Blanchet, N. Dudovich, B. Pons, and Y. Mairesse. Revealing the influence of molecular chi- rality on tunnel-ionization dynamics. Phys. Rev. X , 11...

    2021

  10. [18]

    Fehre, S

    K. Fehre, S. Eckart, M. Kunitski, C. Janke, D. Tra- bert, M. Hofmann, J. Rist, M. Weller, A. Hartung, L. Ph. H. Schmidt, T. Jahnke, H. Braun, T. Baumert, J. Stohner, Ph. V. Demekhin, M. S. Sch¨ offler, and R. D¨ orner. Strong differential photoion circular dichro- ism in strong-fi...

    2021

  11. [19]

    Enhanced chiral-sensitivity of coulomb-focused electrons in strong field ionization

    S Rozen, S Larroque, N Dudovich, Y Mairesse, and B Pons. Enhanced chiral-sensitivity of coulomb-focused electrons in strong field ionization. Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics , 54(18):184002, oct 2021

    2021

  12. [20]

    Xavier Barcons Planas, Andr´ es Ord´ o˜ nez, Maciej Lewen- stein, and Andrew S. Maxwell. Ultrafast imaging of molecular chirality with photoelectron vortices. Phys. Rev. Lett., 129:233201, Nov 2022

    2022

  13. [21]

    Imprinting chirality on atoms using synthetic chiral light fields

    Nicola Mayer, Serguei Patchkovskii, Felipe Morales, Misha Ivanov, and Olga Smirnova. Imprinting chirality on atoms using synthetic chiral light fields. Phys. Rev. Lett., 129:243201, Dec 2022

    2022

  14. [22]

    Hofmann, D

    M. Hofmann, D. Trabert, A. Geyer, N. Anders, J. Kruse, J. Rist, L. Ph. H. Schmidt, T. Jahnke, M. Kunitski, M. S. Sch¨ offler, S. Eckart, and R. D¨ orner. Subcycle resolved strong field ionization of chiral molecules and the origin of chiral photoelectron asymmetries. Phys. Rev. R...

    2024

  15. [23]

    Beaulieu, S

    S. Beaulieu, S. Larroque, D. Descamps, B. Fabre, S. Pe- tit, R. Ta ¨ ıeb, B. Pons, and Y. Mairesse. Strong-field ionization of chiral molecules with bicircular laser fields : Sub-barrier dynamics, interference, and vortices. Phys. Rev. A , 110:013103, Jul 2024

    2024

  16. [24]

    Attosecond vor- tex photoelectron holography for probing phase-encoded chirality

    Liding Li, Yongkun Chen, Miao Yu, Xu Zhang, Yang Li, Yueming Zhou, and Peixiang Lu. Attosecond vor- tex photoelectron holography for probing phase-encoded chirality. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 136:093202, Mar 2026

    2026

  17. [25]

    Beaulieu, A

    S. Beaulieu, A. Comby, D. Descamps, B. Fabre, G. A. Garcia, R. G´ eneaux, A. G. Harvey, F. L´ egar´ e, Z. Maˇ s ´ ın, L. Nahon, A. F. Ordonez, S. Petit, B. Pons, Y. Mairesse, O. Smirnova, and V. Blanchet. Photoexcitation circular dichroism in chiral molecules. Nature Physics, ...

    2018

  18. [26]

    V ´ ıt Svoboda, Niraghatam Bhargava Ram, Denitsa Baykusheva, Daniel Zindel, Max D. J. Waters, Benjamin Spenger, Manuel Ochsner, Holger Herburger, J¨ urgen Stohner, and Hans Jakob W¨ orner. Femtosecond photo- electron circular dichroism of chemical reactions. Science Advances, ...

    2022

  19. [27]

    Tikhonov, Alexander Blech, Monika Leibscher, Loren Greenman, Melanie Schnell, and Christiane P

    Denis S. Tikhonov, Alexander Blech, Monika Leibscher, Loren Greenman, Melanie Schnell, and Christiane P. Koch. Pump-probe spectroscopy of chiral vibrational dy- namics. Science Advances, 8(49):eade0311, 2022

    2022

  20. [28]

    Faccial` a, M

    D. Faccial` a, M. Devetta, S. Beauvarlet, N. Besley, F. Calegari, C. Callegari, D. Catone, E. Cinquanta, A. G. Ciriolo, L. Colaizzi, M. Coreno, G. Crippa, G. De Ninno, M. Di Fraia, M. Galli, G. A. Garcia, Y. Mairesse, M. Ne- gro, O. Plekan, P. Prasannan Geetha, K. C. Prince, A...

    2023

  21. [29]

    M ˚ ansson, Lorenzo Colaizzi, Sergey Ryabchuk, Krishna Saraswathula, An- dres F

    Vincent Wanie, Etienne Bloch, Erik P. M ˚ ansson, Lorenzo Colaizzi, Sergey Ryabchuk, Krishna Saraswathula, An- dres F. Ordonez, David Ayuso, Olga Smirnova, Andrea Trabattoni, Val´ erie Blanchet, Nadia Ben Amor, Marie- Catherine Heitz, Yann Mairesse, Bernard Pons, and Francesca...

    2024

  22. [30]

    Monika Leibscher, Eugenio Pozzoli, Alexander Blech, 7 Mario Sigalotti, Ugo Boscain, and Christiane P. Koch. Quantum control of rovibrational dynamics and applica- tion to light-induced molecular chirality. Phys. Rev. A , 109:012810, Jan 2024

    2024

  23. [31]

    C. T. L. Smeenk, L. Arissian, B. Zhou, A. Mysyrowicz, D. M. Villeneuve, A. Staudte, and P. B. Corkum. Parti- tioning of the linear photon momentum in multiphoton ionization. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 106:193002, May 2011

    2011

  24. [32]

    Ludwig, J

    A. Ludwig, J. Maurer, B. W. Mayer, C. R. Phillips, L. Gallmann, and U. Keller. Breakdown of the dipole ap- proximation in strong-field ionization. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 113:243001, Dec 2014

    2014

  25. [33]

    Bandrauk, and Paul B

    Szczepan Chelkowski, Andr´ e D. Bandrauk, and Paul B. Corkum. Photon momentum sharing between an elec- tron and an ion in photoionization: From one-photon (photoelectric effect) to multiphoton absorption. Phys. Rev. Lett., 113:263005, Dec 2014

    2014

  26. [34]

    Strong field theories beyond dipole approximations in nonrelativistic regimes

    Pei-Lun He, Di Lao, and Feng He. Strong field theories beyond dipole approximations in nonrelativistic regimes. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 118:163203, Apr 2017

    2017

  27. [35]

    Ilchen, G

    M. Ilchen, G. Hartmann, E. V. Gryzlova, A. Achner, E. Allaria, A. Beckmann, M. Braune, J. Buck, C. Calle- gari, R. N. Coffee, R. Cucini, M. Danailov, A. De Fanis, A. Demidovich, E. Ferrari, P. Finetti, L. Glaser, A. Knie, A. O. Lindahl, O. Plekan, N. Mahne, T. Mazza, L. Rai- mo...

    2018

  28. [36]

    Hartung, S

    A. Hartung, S. Eckart, S. Brennecke, J. Rist, D. Tra- bert, K. Fehre, M. Richter, H. Sann, S. Zeller, K. Hen- richs, G. Kastirke, J. Hoehl, A. Kalinin, M. S. Sch¨ offler, T. Jahnke, L. Ph. H. Schmidt, M. Lein, M. Kunitski, and R. D¨ orner. Magnetic fields alter strong-field ioniza...

    2019

  29. [37]

    Grundmann, F

    Si-Ge Chen, Wei-Chao Jiang, S. Grundmann, F. Trinter, M. S. Sch¨ offler, T. Jahnke, R. D¨ orner, Hao Liang, Mu- Xue Wang, Liang-You Peng, and Qihuang Gong. Photon momentum transfer in single-photon double ionization of helium. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 124:043201, Jan 2020

    2020

  30. [38]

    Theory of subcycle linear momentum transfer in strong- field tunneling ionization

    Hongcheng Ni, Simon Brennecke, Xiang Gao, Pei-Lun He, Stefan Donsa, Iva Bˇ rezinov´ a, Feng He, Jian Wu, Manfred Lein, Xiao-Min Tong, and Joachim Burgd¨ orfer. Theory of subcycle linear momentum transfer in strong- field tunneling ionization. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 125:073202, Aug 2020

    2020

  31. [39]

    Kang Lin, Sebastian Eckart, Alexander Hartung, Daniel Trabert, Kilian Fehre, Jonas Rist, Lothar Ph. H. Schmidt, Markus S. Sch¨ offler, Till Jahnke, Maksim Ku- nitski, and Reinhard D¨ orner. Photoelectron energy peaks shift against the radiation pressure in strong-field ioniza - t...

    2022

  32. [40]

    Attosecond-resolved non-dipole photoionization dynam- ics

    Jintai Liang, Meng Han, Yijie Liao, Jia-bao Ji, Chung Sum Leung, Wei-Chao Jiang, Kiyoshi Ueda, Yueming Zhou, Peixiang Lu, and Hans Jakob W¨ orner. Attosecond-resolved non-dipole photoionization dynam- ics. Nature Photonics , 18(4):311–317, April 2024

    2024

  33. [41]

    Photon momentum transfer and partitioning: from one to many

    Xiaodan Mao, Hongcheng Ni, Kang Lin, Pei-Lun He, Hao Liang, Sebastian Eckart, Feng He, Kiyoshi Ueda, Rein- hard D¨ orner, and Jian Wu. Photon momentum transfer and partitioning: from one to many. Nature Communi- cations, 16(1):5977, July 2025

    2025

  34. [42]

    Nondipole effects on electron correlation dy- namics of xe atoms in circularly polarized laser fields

    Yankun Dou, Peizeng Li, Xiaoxiao Long, Peipei Ge, Yongkai Deng, Chengyin Wu, Qihuang Gong, and Yun- quan Liu. Nondipole effects on electron correlation dy- namics of xe atoms in circularly polarized laser fields. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 136:073201, Feb 2026

    2026

  35. [43]

    Clas- sification of nondipole effects in photoionization on the attosecond timescale

    Yongkun Chen, Yijie Liao, Xu Zhang, Yang Li, Jan Mar- cus Dahlstr¨ om, Peixiang Lu, and Yueming Zhou. Clas- sification of nondipole effects in photoionization on the attosecond timescale. Ultrafast Science, 6:0160, 2026

    2026

  36. [44]

    Sven Grundmann, Daniel Trabert, Kilian Fehre, Nico Strenger, Andreas Pier, Leon Kaiser, Max Kircher, Miriam Weller, Sebastian Eckart, Lothar Ph. H. Schmidt, Florian Trinter, Till Jahnke, Markus S. Sch¨ offler, and Reinhard D¨ orner. Zeptosecond birth time delay in molec- ular ph...

    2020

  37. [45]

    Demekhin, Lothar Ph

    Sven Grundmann, Max Kircher, Isabel Vela-Perez, Gi- ammarco Nalin, Daniel Trabert, Nils Anders, Niklas Melzer, Jonas Rist, Andreas Pier, Nico Strenger, Juliane Siebert, Philipp V. Demekhin, Lothar Ph. H. Schmidt, Florian Trinter, Markus S. Sch¨ offler, Till Jahnke, and Reinhard ...

    2020

  38. [46]

    D. V. Rezvan, K. Klyssek, S. Grundmann, A. Pier, N. M. Novikovskiy, N. Strenger, D. Tsitsonis, M. Kircher, I. Vela-Per´ ez, K. Fehre, F. Trinter, M. S. Sch¨ offler, T. Jahnke, R. D¨ orner, and Ph. V. Demekhin. Ob- servation of nondipole-induced asymmetry in the angu- lar emissio...

    2022

  39. [47]

    Novikovskiy, Dmitrii V

    Nikolay M. Novikovskiy, Dmitrii V. Rezvan, Laura Sommerlad, Arno Ehresmann, Till Jahnke, Reinhard D¨ orner, Markus S. Sch¨ offler, and Philipp V. Demekhin. Interplay between the electric-dipole and nondipole- induced forward-backward asymmetries in the inner- shell photoionizati...

    2025

  40. [48]

    P. M. Paul, E. S. Toma, P. Breger, G. Mullot, F. Aug´ e, Ph. Balcou, H. G. Muller, and P. Agostini. Observation of a train of attosecond pulses from high harmonic gen- eration. Science, 292(5522):1689–1692, 2001

    2001

  41. [49]

    Kl¨ under, J

    K. Kl¨ under, J. M. Dahlstr¨ om, M. Gisselbrecht, T. Fordell, M. Swoboda, D. Gu´ enot, P. Johnsson, J. Caillat, J. Mauritsson, A. Maquet, R. Ta ¨ ıeb, and A. L’Huillier. Probing single-photon ionization on the attosecond time scale. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 106:143002, Apr 2011

    2011

  42. [50]

    Attosecond delays in molecular photoionization

    Martin Huppert, Inga Jordan, Denitsa Baykusheva, Aaron von Conta, and Hans Jakob W¨ orner. Attosecond delays in molecular photoionization. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 117:093001, Aug 2016

    2016

  43. [51]

    Cattaneo, J

    L. Cattaneo, J. Vos, R. Y. Bello, A. Palacios, S. Heuser, L. Pedrelli, M. Lucchini, C. Cirelli, F. Mart ´ ın, and U. Keller. Attosecond coupled electron and nuclear dy- namics in dissociative ionization of h2. Nature Physics , 14(7):733–738, July 2018

    2018

  44. [52]

    Fano’s propensity rule in angle-resolved attosecond pump-probe photoionization

    David Busto, Jimmy Vinbladh, Shiyang Zhong, Mar- cus Isinger, Saikat Nandi, Sylvain Maclot, Per Johnsson, Mathieu Gisselbrecht, Anne L’Huillier, Eva Lindroth, and Jan Marcus Dahlstr¨ om. Fano’s propensity rule in angle-resolved attosecond pump-probe photoionization. Phys. Rev....

    2019

  45. [53]

    Attosecond circular-dichroism 8 chronoscopy of electron vortices

    Meng Han, Jia-Bao Ji, Tadas Balˇ ci¯ unas, Kiyoshi Ueda, and Hans Jakob W¨ orner. Attosecond circular-dichroism 8 chronoscopy of electron vortices. Nature Physics , 19(2):230–236, February 2023

    2023

  46. [54]

    Wenyu Jiang, Gregory S. J. Armstrong, Lulu Han, Yi- dan Xu, Zitan Zuo, Jihong Tong, Peifen Lu, Jan Marcus Dahlstr¨ om, Kiyoshi Ueda, Andrew C. Brown, Hugo W. van der Hart, Xiaochun Gong, and Jian Wu. Resolving quantum interference black box through attosecond pho- toionization...

    2023

  47. [55]

    Loriot, A

    V. Loriot, A. Boyer, S. Nandi, C. M. Gonz´ alez- Collado, E. Pl´ esiat, A. Marciniak, C. L. Garcia, Y. Hu, M. Lara-Astiaso, A. Palacios, P. Decleva, F. Mart ´ ın, and F. L´ epine. Attosecond metrology of the two- dimensional charge distribution in molecules. Nature Physics, 20...

    2024

  48. [56]

    Separation of photoioniza- tion and measurement-induced delays

    Meng Han, Jia-Bao Ji, Chung Sum Leung, Kiyoshi Ueda, and Hans Jakob W¨ orner. Separation of photoioniza- tion and measurement-induced delays. Science Advances, 10(4):eadj2629, 2024

    2024

  49. [57]

    Lin- early polarized rabbit beyond the dipole approximation

    Yijie Liao, Yongkun Chen, Jan Marcus Dahlstr¨ om, Liang-Wen Pi, Peixiang Lu, and Yueming Zhou. Lin- early polarized rabbit beyond the dipole approximation. Phys. Rev. A , 110:023109, Aug 2024

    2024

  50. [58]

    Bello, and Fernando Mart ´ ın

    Prateek Pranjal, Jesus Gonz´ alez-V´ azquez, Roger Y. Bello, and Fernando Mart ´ ın. Vibrationally resolved pho- toionization delays in the water molecule. Phys. Rev. Lett., 135:223202, Nov 2025

    2025

  51. [59]

    Serov, Jia-Bao Ji, Meng Han, Kiyoshi Ueda, Hans Jakob W¨ orner, and Anatoli S

    Vladislav V. Serov, Jia-Bao Ji, Meng Han, Kiyoshi Ueda, Hans Jakob W¨ orner, and Anatoli S. Kheifets. Circular rabbitt goes under threshold: A sensitive probe of dis- crete excitations in noble gas atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 136:083202, Feb 2026

    2026

  52. [60]

    Ferr´ e, C

    A. Ferr´ e, C. Handschin, M. Dumergue, F. Burgy, A. Comby, D. Descamps, B. Fabre, G. A. Garcia, R. G´ eneaux, L. Merceron, E. M´ evel, L. Nahon, S. Petit, B. Pons, D. Staedter, S. Weber, T. Ruchon, V. Blanchet, and Y. Mairesse. A table-top ultrashort light source in the extrem...

    2015

  53. [61]

    Hickstein, Jennifer L

    Pei-Chi Huang, Carlos Hern´ andez-Garc ´ ıa, Jen-Ting Huang, Po-Yao Huang, Chih-Hsuan Lu, Laura Rego, Daniel D. Hickstein, Jennifer L. Ellis, Agnieszka Jaron- Becker, Andreas Becker, Shang-Da Yang, Charles G. Durfee, Luis Plaja, Henry C. Kapteyn, Margaret M. Mur- nane, A. H. K...

    2018

  54. [62]

    Attosecond metrology in circular polarization

    Meng Han, Jia-Bao Ji, Kiyoshi Ueda, and Hans Jakob W¨ orner. Attosecond metrology in circular polarization. Optica, 10(8):1044–1052, Aug 2023

    2023

  55. [63]

    Esteban Goetz, Corbin Allison, Loren Greenman, Christiane P

    Meng Han, Jia-Bao Ji, Alexander Blech, R. Esteban Goetz, Corbin Allison, Loren Greenman, Christiane P. Koch, and Hans Jakob W¨ orner. Attosecond control and measurement of chiral photoionization dynamics. Nature, 645(8079):95–100, September 2025

    2025

  56. [64]

    Esteban Goetz, Alexander Blech, Corbin Allison, Christiane P

    R. Esteban Goetz, Alexander Blech, Corbin Allison, Christiane P. Koch, and Loren Greenman. Continuum- electron interferometry for enhancement of photoelectron circular dichroism and measurement of bound, free, and mixed contributions to chiral response. Phys. Rev. Res. , 7:L03...

    2025

  57. [65]

    Attosecond-resolved photoionization dy- namics and interference-enhanced photoelectron circu- lar dichroism in chiral molecules

    Zheming Zhou, Yang Li, Xu Zhang, Yueming Zhou, and Peixiang Lu. Attosecond-resolved photoionization dy- namics and interference-enhanced photoelectron circu- lar dichroism in chiral molecules. Advanced Photonics, 8(1):015001, 2026

    2026

Pith tools

Reviewed July 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.