pith. sign in

arxiv: 2404.17663 · v1 · pith:V6PPNQXJnew · submitted 2024-04-26 · 💻 cs.DL

An analysis of the suitability of OpenAlex for bibliometric analyses

classification 💻 cs.DL
keywords openalexanalysesdatabasessciencescopusacrossanalysislimitations
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Scopus and the Web of Science have been the foundation for research in the science of science even though these traditional databases systematically underrepresent certain disciplines and world regions. In response, new inclusive databases, notably OpenAlex, have emerged. While many studies have begun using OpenAlex as a data source, few critically assess its limitations. This study, conducted in collaboration with the OpenAlex team, addresses this gap by comparing OpenAlex to Scopus across a number of dimensions. The analysis concludes that OpenAlex is a superset of Scopus and can be a reliable alternative for some analyses, particularly at the country level. Despite this, issues of metadata accuracy and completeness show that additional research is needed to fully comprehend and address OpenAlex's limitations. Doing so will be necessary to confidently use OpenAlex across a wider set of analyses, including those that are not at all possible with more constrained databases.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Bilateral and multilateral international scientific collaboration of EU member states: OpenAlex vs Scopus (2000-2024)

    cs.DL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    OpenAlex restricted to cited articles produces country-level collaboration metrics comparable to Scopus, with higher multilateral than bilateral intensity and persistent structural asymmetries between EU-14 and EU-13 groups.

  2. An analysis of the effects of open science indicators on citations in the French Open Science Monitor

    cs.DL 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Preprints correlate with 19% higher citations, software sharing with 13.5%, data sharing with 14.3%, and open access with 8.6% in a citation prediction model applied to the French Open Science Monitor dataset.

  3. Evolution of bilateral and multilateral collaboration of EU-14 countries across disciplines, 2010-2024

    cs.DL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Bilateral collaboration rates among EU-14 countries stayed stable and mostly internal while multilateral rates rose across disciplines, especially medicine, with highest levels in physics; no major post-Brexit shift b...