Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:11.579174Z
Paper Citation Record · LEDGER
The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions
As of 8 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 50 of 50 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2507.08881.
A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.
Coverage vector
One-hop event checks from named stored sources.
Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00
Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links
A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.
Source: cited_works
Reference resolution
50 of 50 outbound references displayed
- verified exact1
- verified fuzzy34
- unresolved15
- parse uncertain0
- malformed identifier0
- metadata mismatch0
External citation measurements
No source-named external measurement is stored.
Outbound references
Observation 1ce69d67-5897-4796-a9a1-f25e16f98acd · outbound
This paper cites Technical report (2025).
The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Technical report (2025)
Reference 1
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:22.953380Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.
Observation 6785307d-cfb3-4934-b3ab-3204ebaf0e2d · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Unresolved cited work
Reference 2
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:22.733690Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.
Observation 40399c9d-6f8a-4c06-9a3f-74bf1cca2c02 · outbound
This paper cites Technical report (2024).
The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Technical report (2024)
Reference 3
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:22.507434Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.
Observation c7ed0abb-c784-43f1-90d2-696be4bff6a5 · outbound
This paper cites The Illusion of Thinking: Understanding the Strengths and Limitations of Reasoning Models via the Lens of Problem Complexity.
The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions The Illusion of Thinking: Understanding the Strengths and Limitations of Reasoning Models via the Lens of Problem Complexity
Reference 4
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:03.397957Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation c4a39fd7-7a62-447c-82de-3b00d38471ba · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Unresolved cited work
Reference 5
- Resolution
- verified exact
- doi, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:11.785453Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.
Observation 1feccfe9-66c2-4446-ab70-a61535e1d488 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Unresolved cited work
Reference 6
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:22.239394Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.
Observation 66934d1b-b8ae-4a03-9399-99f13253cd02 · outbound
This paper cites legal market.
The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions legal market
Reference 7
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:22.048268Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.
Observation 877ac962-bf3a-4a87-8915-920f2e581b2f · outbound
This paper cites Weber, Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology , G.
The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Weber, Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology , G
Reference 8
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:20.939413Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.
Observation 5a53bc66-4008-4ec0-add5-7616f1113d52 · outbound
This paper cites Habermas, The Theory of Communicative Action: V ol.
The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Habermas, The Theory of Communicative Action: V ol
Reference 9
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:19.900075Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.
Observation 654d24e4-8eb6-4994-b1c2-c7fa58e212d7 · outbound
This paper cites Habermas, The Theory of Communicative Action: V ol.
The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Habermas, The Theory of Communicative Action: V ol
Reference 10
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:19.591498Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.
Observation b483769f-cd04-4861-b2ad-2c66e0d97927 · outbound
This paper cites Morison, A.
Reference 11
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:19.309662Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.
Observation 5aac0ba6-ecbd-4cd3-ad47-de1879163074 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Unresolved cited work
Reference 12
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:19.144853Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.
Observation 4a67e692-872a-4fe2-a4e8-020949bbad30 · outbound
This paper cites Technical report (2024).https://www.creativerightsinstitute.
The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Technical report (2024).https://www.creativerightsinstitute
Reference 13
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:19.042455Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.
Observation 2f7b3a27-cbbf-4996-b00a-809f8a9290af · outbound
This paper cites Technical report (2024).
The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Technical report (2024)
Reference 14
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:18.902828Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.
Observation ecb39e43-f6eb-4ae5-8a8e-1af325ed4d85 · outbound
This paper cites Technical report (2024).
The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Technical report (2024)
Reference 15
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:18.701846Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.
Observation bf2ab4b7-ce16-4328-b0a6-21cce2ee569e · outbound
This paper cites Technical report (2024).
The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Technical report (2024)
Reference 16
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:18.504907Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.
Observation 2dde9960-56e3-4934-b182-ef19fe12067a · outbound
This paper cites Technical re- port (2024).
The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Technical re- port (2024)
Reference 17
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:18.347207Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.
Observation e64bbc9a-6fa9-4eef-9c57-2aea2eb41fc1 · outbound
This paper cites Surani et al., AI for scaling legal reform: Mapping and redacting racial covenants in Santa Clara County.
The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Surani et al., AI for scaling legal reform: Mapping and redacting racial covenants in Santa Clara County
Reference 18
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:18.224561Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.
Observation e83e63ac-f224-45c3-b99d-bd9ba7544149 · outbound
This paper cites Technical report (2024).
The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Technical report (2024)
Reference 19
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:18.053593Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.
Observation eb4e7ca2-fe9f-4199-9a77-d87e7f87e2c8 · outbound
This paper cites Technical report (2025).
The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Technical report (2025)
Reference 20
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:17.874226Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.
Observation d747b07e-7371-4338-a013-d1d21d2e74b5 · outbound
This paper cites Technical report (2025).
The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Technical report (2025)
Reference 21
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:17.705911Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.
Observation 1788ea32-b293-4abe-9410-f760e367175f · outbound
This paper cites Technical report (2024).
The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Technical report (2024)
Reference 22
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:17.483431Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.
Observation 986fb662-d0f2-404d-a0ac-9ef238351b60 · outbound
This paper cites Hallucination-Free? Assessing the Reliability of Leading AI Legal Research Tools.
The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Hallucination-Free? Assessing the Reliability of Leading AI Legal Research Tools
Reference 23
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:05.738071Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation dff4926b-6ffb-410e-94d6-e75c85a25517 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Unresolved cited work
Reference 24
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:17.241254Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.
Observation fb631d3d-c7ad-4aa3-83c1-464afc7d0556 · outbound
This paper cites A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judge.
The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judge
Reference 25
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:05.985629Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 9f0240b4-d52e-4b33-a97a-42667c2218f5 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Unresolved cited work
Reference 26
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:16.986987Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.
Observation a90de854-08a4-4ae0-bae7-946dd7566361 · outbound
This paper cites Towards Robust Legal Reasoning: Harnessing Logical LLMs in Law.
The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Towards Robust Legal Reasoning: Harnessing Logical LLMs in Law
Reference 27
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:06.205155Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 9c05d50d-dc19-4048-a106-7a55dbd8e76f · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Unresolved cited work
Reference 28
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:16.759113Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.
Observation dfd0c2ea-d23f-4bc6-bab0-9bf8d289f13a · outbound
This paper cites Loomis, 881 N.W.2d 749 (Wis.
The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Loomis, 881 N.W.2d 749 (Wis
Reference 29
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:16.579001Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.
Observation 1a095e91-be39-4ece-a31b-ee9389b727e4 · outbound
This paper cites Technical report (2024).
The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Technical report (2024)
Reference 30
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:16.409471Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.
Observation 35c6de16-3ddc-46bc-9f23-82886506b6d8 · outbound
This paper cites AI-assisted trial system.
The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions AI-assisted trial system
Reference 31
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:16.216950Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.
Observation 5f0b355a-3595-4843-9765-ca026e669050 · outbound
This paper cites Thomas, 2024 UK judicial attitude survey.
The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Thomas, 2024 UK judicial attitude survey
Reference 32
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:15.992449Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.
Observation d6f6ba0a-6b7e-4021-a59e-c1f1faf9516b · outbound
This paper cites Technical report (2024).https://www.
The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Technical report (2024).https://www
Reference 33
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:15.765542Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.
Observation 954f8457-0867-4ee5-9fef-d939c0dea1d9 · outbound
This paper cites The Florida Bar News (2024).
The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions The Florida Bar News (2024)
Reference 34
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:15.576735Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.
Observation 875720eb-2d8e-4548-aaf1-a91ef68a024d · outbound
This paper cites Technical report (2024).https://www.bloomberglaw.com/ bloomberg-law-research-reports (accessed 17 June 2025).
The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Technical report (2024).https://www.bloomberglaw.com/ bloomberg-law-research-reports (accessed 17 June 2025)
Reference 35
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:15.364694Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.
Observation ac1c1e76-678a-4f43-a541-1a20b2e278a2 · outbound
This paper cites public and AI experts view artificial intelli- gence.
The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions public and AI experts view artificial intelli- gence
Reference 36
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:15.169851Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.
Observation f8223809-20dc-460c-8706-05e0c7627b06 · outbound
This paper cites Technical report (2024).
The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Technical report (2024)
Reference 37
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:14.992467Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.
Observation f4c80cfe-9f03-4329-97e2-f34b581ff84e · outbound
This paper cites democracy in the age of AI.
The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions democracy in the age of AI
Reference 38
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:14.796993Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.
Observation 76f5d87d-63f8-437f-ae0e-637fa8f7be9a · outbound
This paper cites Technical report (2024).
The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Technical report (2024)
Reference 39
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:14.542970Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.
Observation 9af17cdd-adff-46e4-9086-c0b456bf5bc3 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Unresolved cited work
Reference 40
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:14.281844Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.
Observation 7dd45685-b44b-4cb1-b2f6-cbde034358eb · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Unresolved cited work
Reference 41
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:14.007934Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.
Observation 74fa1241-5b9f-4ddc-bb64-0be183477371 · outbound
This paper cites https://www.legaldive.
The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions https://www.legaldive
Reference 42
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:13.797548Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.
Observation 09ed9d5d-5e7c-40f4-9d50-9c4e887e9239 · outbound
This paper cites Bourdieu, The force of law: Toward a sociology of the juridical field.
The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Bourdieu, The force of law: Toward a sociology of the juridical field
Reference 43
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:13.583973Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.
Observation 0c4f63b6-237f-46be-b5f3-65c30208fc6e · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Unresolved cited work
Reference 44
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:13.337730Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.
Observation 6cc5ad25-a606-4e1a-9925-4c20276a805a · outbound
This paper cites 73, 02009 (2025).
The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions 73, 02009 (2025)
Reference 45
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:13.116190Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.
Observation 18900d17-a698-44e0-b39a-bf35f6801bb7 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Unresolved cited work
Reference 46
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:12.919151Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.
Observation 16673f08-aaf3-4663-a000-788a9dafce7b · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Unresolved cited work
Reference 47
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:12.654276Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.
Observation ca7bbf69-e331-4808-8a6e-77d65efa6ccd · outbound
This paper cites Fabiano et al., How to optimize the systematic review process using AI tools.
The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Fabiano et al., How to optimize the systematic review process using AI tools
Reference 48
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:12.423553Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.
Observation a1341417-3b99-4144-bc35-36ef6d28e70f · outbound
This paper cites Alshami et al., Harnessing the power of ChatGPT for automating systematic review process: Methodology, case study, limitations, and future directions.
The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions Alshami et al., Harnessing the power of ChatGPT for automating systematic review process: Methodology, case study, limitations, and future directions
Reference 49
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:12.254653Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.
Observation 929d260a-47a7-456c-a041-448f2cd4f22d · outbound
This paper cites very strict regulation.
The Consistency-Acceptability Divergence of LLMs in Judicial Decision-Making: Task and Stakeholder Dimensions very strict regulation
Reference 50
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:39:12.030244Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.
Pith citing papers
No inbound Pith citation observations are available.