pith. sign in

arxiv: 1106.0236 · v1 · pith:V7VVCMQZnew · submitted 2011-06-01 · 🧬 q-bio.QM · cond-mat.dis-nn

What you see is not what you get: how sampling affects macroscopic features of biological networks

classification 🧬 q-bio.QM cond-mat.dis-nn
keywords networksdegreebiasedbiologicalsamplingcorrelationdistributionsfeatures
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We use mathematical methods from the theory of tailored random graphs to study systematically the effects of sampling on topological features of large biological signalling networks. Our aim in doing so is to increase our quantitative understanding of the relation between true biological networks and the imperfect and often biased samples of these networks that are reported in public data repositories and used by biomedical scientists. We derive exact explicit formulae for degree distributions and degree correlation kernels of sampled networks, in terms of the degree distributions and degree correlation kernels of the underlying true network, for a broad family of sampling protocols that include (un-)biased node and/or link undersampling as well as (un-)biased link oversampling. Our predictions are in excellent agreement with numerical simulations.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.