Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Strong coupling between a dielectric nanocavity and a monolayer transition metal dichalcogenide

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper reports the experimental realization of strong coupling between a deep-subwavelength dielectric nanocavity and excitons in a monolayer of MoTe2, evidenced by avoided crossing in photoluminescence and reflection, with interaction…

desk verdict First strong coupling between a low-loss dielectric deep-subwavelength nanocavity and a monolayer TMDC, with solid two-measurement evidence; the detuning calibration is the piece I'd want pinned down before fully closing the case. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.06529 v2 pith:VBGEHQGK submitted 2025-02-10 physics.optics cond-mat.other

F. Schröder , P. Wyborski , M. Xiong , G. Kountouris , B. Munkhbat , M. Wubs , P. T. Kristensen , J. M{o}rk
show 1 more author
N. Stenger
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticscond-mat.other
keywords strongcouplingexciton-polaritonsmonolayerMoTe2extremedielectricconfinementRabisplittingquasinormalmodesreaction-coordinateformalismnanophotonics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to show that a dielectric nanocavity -- one that squeezes light into a volume far below the diffraction limit without the metal losses of plasmonic structures -- can be coupled strongly enough to the excitons of a single monolayer of molybdenum ditelluride (MoTe2) to reach the strong-coupling regime. The authors report an avoided crossing in temperature-resolved photoluminescence and reflection spectra, from which they extract light-matter interaction strengths of $g_{\mathrm{PL}}=5.3(3)\,\mathrm{meV}$ and $g_{\mathrm{R}}=4.7(7)\,\mathrm{meV}$. The corresponding Rabi splitting is about 10 meV, more than twice the combined cavity and exciton losses, placing the system clearly above the strong-coupling threshold. Because the cavity confines light laterally to about 70 nm while keeping dielectric losses low, the result points toward strong nonlinearities and polariton blockade at the single-photon level.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the extreme dielectric confinement (EDC) nanocavity, a topology-optimized InP structure with 20 nm central void spacing that confines light to $\sigma\approx70$ nm without metal. It is represented by a single quasinormal mode, a leaky cavity mode with complex eigenenergy $\tilde E_c=E_c-i\Gamma_c/2$, whose real part is the resonance energy and whose imaginary part is half the linewidth. The predicted coupling strength comes from the reaction-coordinate formula $g_{\mathrm{theory}}^2=\frac{\hbar^2 e_0^2}{\pi\epsilon_0 m_0^2 E_{\mathrm{cav}} a_B^2}\sum_\alpha\int d^2r\,|\tilde{\mathbf F}(\mathbf r,z_{2D})\cdot\mathbf p^\alpha_{cv}|^2$, which sums the overlap of the normalized cavity field with the MoTe2 valley dipole moments over the monolayer plane. The experimental extraction uses a coupled-oscillator model, a $2\times2$ matrix whose complex eigenvalues give the upper and lower polariton energies and linewidths; the strong-coupling condition is expressed as $N_{\mathrm{Rabi}}=2E_{\mathrm{Rabi}}/(\Gamma_{\mathrm{exc}}+\Gamma_{\mathrm{cav}})\ge1$, with $E_{\mathrm{Rabi}}=\sqrt{4g^2-(\Gamma_{\mathrm{cav}}-\Gamma_{\mathrm{exc}})^2/4}$. Reference measurements of a bare sibling cavity and of cross-polarized exciton emission provide the uncoupled energies, linewidths, and the temperature-dependent detuning that the fits use.

What would settle it

Measure the bare cavity mode of the same physical nanocavity used for the coupled experiment, for example by lifting off or etching away the MoTe2/hBN heterostructure after the measurements, and compare that directly measured $E_{\mathrm{cav}}$ with the value reconstructed from the sibling reference cavity; if they differ by more than about 1 meV, the extracted $g$ would move outside the quoted uncertainties. A complementary check is a time-domain measurement at $T=40$ K looking for vacuum Rabi oscillations with a period of roughly $2\pi/(2g)\approx0.4$ ps, whose presence would confirm the oscillatory energy exchange that defines strong coupling.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that strong light-matter coupling can be achieved between a deeply sub-wavelength dielectric nanocavity and the A-exciton of an hBN-encapsulated monolayer MoTe2. The cavity is a topology-optimized InP structure approximated by ellipses and tangents, described by a single quasinormal mode with a resonance near $1.187$ eV, an experimental quality factor of $Q=358(11)$, and a lateral field confinement of $\sigma\approx70$ nm. The evidence is an avoided crossing observed in both photoluminescence and cross-polarized reflection as temperature sweeps the detuning through zero around $T=40$ K; the polariton peak positions follow a two-oscillator dispersion. Fits yield $g_{\mathrm{PL}}=5.3(3)$ meV and $g_{\mathrm{R}}=4.7(7)$ meV, with a Rabi splitting $E_{\mathrm{Rabi}}=10.6(7)$ meV (PL) or $9.4(15)$ meV (reflection). With $\Gamma_{\mathrm{cav}}=3.3(1)$ meV and $\Gamma_{\mathrm{exc}}=6.0(7)$ meV at resonance, the paper finds $N_{\mathrm{Rabi}}=2.3(1)$ and $2.0(2)$, both above the $N_{\mathrm{Rabi}}\ge1$ criterion. A calculation using the exciton reaction-coordinate formalism gives $g_{\mathrm{theory}}=5.2(7)$ meV, in agreement with experiment.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the uncoupled cavity and exciton energies are correctly reconstructed from reference measurements -- a sibling cavity of nominally identical design for the cavity, and cross-polarized exciton emission from the same flake for the exciton -- together with a constant offset $\Delta$ and a roughly 3 meV spectrometer correction between the two setups; if those references are systematically biased, the detuning axis and the fitted interaction strength shift accordingly.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Strong coupling now coexists with deep sub-wavelength dielectric confinement: the effective mode volume is $V_{\mathrm{eff}}=0.060(\lambda/n)^3$ and the lateral field extent is $\sigma\approx70$ nm, well below $\lambda/(2n)$, while the cavity linewidth $\Gamma_{\mathrm{cav}}=3.3(1)$ meV is an order of magnitude narrower than typical plasmonic linewidths.
  • Because the coupling strength is set mainly by the out-of-plane field confinement of the monolayer rather than by the lateral mode volume, the demonstrated $g\approx5$ meV is on par with values from much larger nanobeam cavities despite the much tighter confinement.
  • The polaritons are laterally confined on the nanoscale, the geometry in which exciton-exciton interactions are expected to be enhanced, so the regime is promising for observing polariton blockade and single-photon nonlinearities.
  • Polarization-resolved photoluminescence shows two polariton peaks parallel to the cavity mode and only residual uncoupled excitons perpendicular to it, confirming that the observed splitting is due to hybridization rather than to a trivial sum of independent emissions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: if the coupling strength is controlled by the field amplitude at the monolayer, then thinning the lower hBN spacer or reshaping the mode to place its maximum exactly at the MoTe2 plane should raise $g$; the paper's own thickness sweep shows this lever is weak over the measured range, so the gain would be modest.
  • Inference: a stronger test of the strong-coupling claim would measure the bare cavity energy on the very same device, for example by removing the heterostructure after the coupled measurements, rather than inferring it from a sibling reference cavity plus a constant offset; a systematic error in that offset would shift $g$ directly.
  • Inference: with $N_{\mathrm{Rabi}}\approx2$, a sub-picosecond time-resolved measurement at $T=40$ K should reveal coherent vacuum Rabi oscillations before decay, and second-order photon correlation measurements would be the natural next step to look for the predicted antibunching.
  • Inference: because the InP cavity is compatible with established integrated photonics, the same geometry could be extended to electrically contacted TMDCs or other near-infrared excitonic materials, though the paper does not demonstrate such control.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the experimental realization of strong coupling between an extreme dielectric confinement (EDC) nanocavity and excitons in a monolayer MoTe2. The authors observe avoided crossing in both temperature-resolved photoluminescence and reflection measurements, and extract light-matter interaction strengths of g_PL = 5.3(3) meV and g_R = 4.7(7) meV. The Rabi splitting exceeds the combined cavity and exciton losses by more than a factor of two, with N_Rabi = 2.3(1) and 2.0(2) for the two measurements. An independent calculation using a reaction-coordinate formalism with literature material parameters and a simulated cavity field yields g_theory = 5.2(7) meV, consistent with experiment. The central claim is that the system reaches a new regime of strong light-matter interaction with deep-subwavelength dielectric confinement and low losses.

Significance. If substantiated, this is an important advance: it extends strong coupling of monolayer transition-metal dichalcogenides from microcavities, nanobeams, and plasmonic structures to topology-optimized dielectric nanocavities with sub-wavelength lateral confinement and small linewidths. The paper is careful in reporting two independent experimental observables (PL and reflection) with consistent coupling values, and it provides error bars, fit procedures, and a separate theoretical estimate that is not obtained from the fitted polariton positions. The main risk is a systematic error in the detuning axis, which is reconstructed from a separate reference cavity; this needs to be quantified before the strong-coupling margin can be considered fully established.

major comments (2)
  1. [Supplementary Information, Reference measurements] The reconstruction E_cav(T) = E_cav,ref(T) + Delta assumes that Delta is independent of temperature over the full measurement range. Delta is determined at 293 K (Setup 1) and 315 K (Setup 2) by comparing the sample cavity with a bare reference cavity on the same chip. However, the sample cavity contains the hBN/MoTe2/hBN heterostructure, which changes the field distribution and introduces materials with different thermo-optic coefficients. A slope mismatch of only 0.02 meV/K between the sample and reference cavities would shift E_cav by about 2 meV at 40 K, which is comparable to g and to the quoted strong-coupling margin. Please provide a quantitative estimate of this systematic uncertainty, for example by measuring the sample cavity at large detuning over the full temperature range or by simulating the temperature-dependent resonance with and without the heterostructure, and include it in the detuning and g error budget.
  2. [Supplementary Information, Details on simulations] The theory value g_theory = 5.2(7) meV is presented as independent confirmation of the experimental result, but the underlying eigenmode calculation omits the 0.65 nm MoTe2 monolayer from the COMSOL simulation. Since this layer has a high refractive index and sits directly at the field maximum, its omission could shift the field distribution and the resonance energy used in Eq. (1). No estimate of the error introduced by this approximation is given. Please quantify this effect with a test calculation that includes a thin MoTe2 layer, or explicitly state the expected magnitude, so that the agreement between theory and experiment can be assessed.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract contains the stray word 'black' in the sentence 'light, black demonstrates a new regime...'; this should be corrected to 'light, which demonstrates a new regime...' or similar.
  2. [Throughout the main text and SI] Cross-references to supplementary sections are left empty, e.g., 'see Sec. in the Supplementary Information'; actual section numbers should be inserted.
  3. [Supplementary Information, Fit with coupled-oscillator model] Equation (S6) is not rendered correctly: the matrix appears with a stray 'EV' and an unbalanced bracket, which makes the coupled-oscillator Hamiltonian difficult to read.
  4. [Supplementary Information, Fits at T = 40 K] The sentence 'The fit yields E_cav,ref = 1.175 eV, from which E_cav is deduced as 1.181 eVis deduced' is grammatically broken and should be rewritten.
  5. [Figure 2 caption] The caption would benefit from an explicit statement of which panels correspond to photoluminescence and which to reflectivity, since panels (a)-(d) are not individually explained.
  6. [Appendix: Experimental setups] The uncertainty of the 3 meV spectrometer offset between Setups 1 and 2 is not stated; it would be helpful to report this value and to indicate how it propagates into the detuning values in Table II.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the experimental strong-coupling claim is self-contained, with only minor non-load-bearing self-citations.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is an experimental demonstration of strong coupling, supported by avoided crossing in temperature-resolved PL and reflection spectra. The coupling strengths g_PL and g_R are obtained from least-squares fits of measured polariton dispersions to the coupled-oscillator model (Eq. S7), with g as the only free parameter; this is a fit to independent data, not a prediction derived from its own inputs. The detuning axis is calibrated from separate reference measurements (E_cav,ref and cross-polarized exciton emission). The assumption that the offset Δ is constant in temperature is a calibration extrapolation that could introduce systematic bias if the thermo-optic response of the coupled cavity differs from the reference cavity, but this is an experimental uncertainty, not a circular reduction: the high-temperature calibration and the low-temperature avoided-crossing data are distinct observations, and the fitted g is not equal to any input by construction. The theoretical value g_theory is computed from Eq. (1) using simulated quasinormal-mode fields and literature material parameters (a_B, p_cv), without using the fitted g or the polariton peak positions; it is therefore an independent prediction. Self-citations to Ref. [59] (reaction-coordinate formalism), Ref. [75] (modal design), Ref. [83] (low-Q mode), and Ref. [62] (prospective nonlinearities) provide theoretical background and interpretation, but they are not load-bearing for the central experimental claim, which rests on directly observed avoided crossing and fitted splittings. No specific reduction of a prediction to a fitted input or to a self-citation chain could be identified, so no circular step is reported.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on measured and fitted coupling strengths, on a calibration offset between two experimental setups, and on the authors' own published reaction-coordinate theory. No new physical entities are introduced. The free parameters are extraction parameters rather than ad hoc knobs, but they are load-bearing for the stated numbers.

free parameters (4)
  • Coupled-oscillator coupling strength g (PL fit) = 5.3(3) meV
    Only free parameter in the dispersion fit to the PL polariton peak positions (SI 'Fit with coupled-oscillator model', Fig. S16).
  • Coupled-oscillator coupling strength g (reflection fit) = 4.7(7) meV
    Only free parameter in the dispersion fit to the reflection peak positions (Fig. S18), restricted to T<180 K.
  • Spectrometer offset between Setup 1 and Setup 2 = 3 meV
    Determined from reference-cavity peak positions extrapolated to 75 K and applied to all Setup 2 data (Appendix, Fig. A1).
  • Varshni zero-temperature exciton energy E_exc(0) = not explicitly quoted
    Free parameter in the Varshni fit to the measured exciton reference energies; alpha and beta fixed from Ref. [95] (SI, Eq. S3).
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The cavity response is accurately described by a single quasinormal mode with complex eigenenergy E_cav - i*Gamma_cav/2.
    Invoked in the main text to justify the coupled-oscillator model; the low-Q orthogonal mode is treated as negligible for the parallel-polarization measurements.
  • domain assumption The reaction-coordinate formalism of Ref. [59] gives the correct coupling strength via Eq. (1), including the finite-area regularization of the divergent QNM normalization.
    The theory calculation of g_theory=5.2(7) meV rests on this framework and on material parameters taken from Refs. [33,85-90].
  • ad hoc to paper The hBN/MoTe2/hBN heterostructure is modeled without the 0.65 nm MoTe2 layer in the COMSOL eigenmode calculation.
    Stated in SI 'Details on simulations'; the thin MoTe2 layer is neglected for the field simulation.
  • domain assumption Reference measurements on a separate cavity and on the exciton emission perpendicular to the cavity mode give unbiased values for E_cav(T), E_exc(T), Gamma_cav(T), and Gamma_exc(T) of the coupled system.
    This is the load-bearing calibration assumption; a systematic error in any reference would bias the detuning axis and hence the extracted g.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Strong coupling between a dielectric nanocavity and a monolayer transition metal dichalcogenide." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VBGEHQGK

@misc{pith2026250206529,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Strong coupling between a dielectric nanocavity and a monolayer transition metal dichalcogenide},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VBGEHQGK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.06529}
}
abstract

We demonstrate strong coupling between light in a dielectric nanocavity with deep sub-wavelength confinement and excitons in a monolayer of molybdenum ditelluride. Avoided crossing is demonstrated by both photoluminescence and reflection measurements, from which we extract a light-matter interaction strength of $g_{\mathrm{PL}} =\SI{5.3\pm0.3}{\milli\eV}$ and $g_{\mathrm{R}} =\SI{4.7\pm0.7}{\milli\eV}$, respectively. The associated Rabi splitting is twice as large as the system's losses. These values are in good agreement with values obtained by a novel exciton reaction coordinate formalism, yielding $g_{\mathrm{theory}} = \SI{5.2\pm0.7}{\milli\eV}$. The strong light-matter interaction, combined with low losses and sub-wavelength confinement of light, black demonstrates a new regime of light-matter interactions where strong nonlinearities at the single-photon level are expected.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.06529 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. a) Artistic representation of the system. Light is confined in an EDC cavity. The ML MoTe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. a) and b) PL spectra as a function of detuning, recorded with the detection polarization aligned with the cavity mode. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. a) PL spectra at T = 50 K as a function of θλ/2 in front of the analyzer. b) PL spectra from (a) with the ana￾lyzer oriented parallel and perpendicular to the cavity mode for black and red lines, respectively. in front of the analyzer. Together with the analyzer, ro￾tating the λ/2 plate by θλ/2 effectively rotates the detec￾tion polarization state by twice that value. Two peaks, separated by 11 meV and associated wi… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Toward triggered generation of indistinguishable single-photons from MoTe$_2$ quantum emitters

    physics.optics 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Single-photon emitters in bilayer MoTe2 show near-infrared emission and a post-selected Hong-Ou-Mandel visibility up to about 40 percent, the first such measurement for a TMD emitter.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

104 extracted references · 76 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Splendiani, L

    A. Splendiani, L. Sun, Y. Zhang, T. Li, J. Kim, C. Y. Chim, G. Galli, and F. Wang, Emerging photoluminescence in monolayer MoS2, Nano Lett.10, 1271 (2010)

    2010

  2. [2]

    K. F. Mak, C. Lee, J. Hone, J. Shan, and T. F. Heinz, Atomically Thin MoS2: A New Direct-Gap Semiconductor, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 136805 (2010)

    2010

  3. [3]

    K. He, N. Kumar, L. Zhao, Z. Wang, K. F. Mak, H. Zhao, and J. Shan, Tightly Bound Excitons in Monolayer WSe2, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 026803 (2014)

    2014

  4. [4]

    Chernikov, T

    A. Chernikov, T. C. Berkelbach, H. M. Hill, A. Rigosi, Y. Li, B. Aslan, D. R. Reichman, M. S. Hybertsen, and T. F. Heinz, Exciton Binding Energy and Nonhydrogenic Rydberg Series in Monolayer WSe2, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 076802 (2014)

    2014

  5. [5]

    Y. Li, A. Chernikov, X. Zhang, A. Rigosi, H. M. Hill, A. M. van der Zande, D. A. Chenet, E.-M. Shih, J. Hone, and T. F. Heinz, Measurement of the optical dielectric function of monolayer transition-metal dichalcogenides: MoS2, MoSe2, WS2 and WSe2, Phys. Rev. B90, 205422 (2014)

    2014

  6. [6]

    Munkhbat, P

    B. Munkhbat, P. Wróbel, T. J. Antosiewicz, and T. O. Shegai, Optical Constants of Several Multilayer Transition Metal Dichalcogenides Measured by Spectroscopic Ellipsometry in the 300–1700 nm Range: High Index, Anisotropy, and Hy- perbolicity, ACS Photonics9, 2398 (2022)

    2022

  7. [7]

    Robert, D

    C. Robert, D. Lagarde, F. Cadiz, G. Wang, B. Lassagne, T. Amand, A. Balocchi, P. Renucci, S. Tongay, B. Urbaszek, and X. Marie, Exciton radiative lifetime in transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers, Phys. Rev. B93, 1 (2016)

    2016

  8. [8]

    Robert, R

    C. Robert, R. Picard, D. Lagarde, G. Wang, J. P. Echeverry, F. Cadiz, P. Renucci, A. Högele, T. Amand, X. Marie, I. C. Gerber, and B. Urbaszek, Excitonic properties of semiconducting monolayer and bilayer MoTe2, Phys. Rev. B94, 155425 (2016)

    2016

Show all 104 references
  1. [9]

    Schneider, M

    C. Schneider, M. M. Glazov, T. Korn, S. Höfling, and B. Urbaszek, Two-dimensional semiconductors in the regime of strong light-matter coupling, Nat. Commun.9, 2695 (2018)

    2018

  2. [10]

    Törmä and W

    P. Törmä and W. L. Barnes, Strong coupling between surface plasmon polaritons and emitters: a review, Reports Prog. Phys. 78, 013901 (2015)

    2015

  3. [11]

    P. A. Gonçalves, N. Stenger, J. D. Cox, N. A. Mortensen, and S. Xiao, Strong Light–Matter Interactions Enabled by Polaritons in Atomically Thin Materials, Adv. Opt. Mater.8, 1 (2020)

    2020

  4. [12]

    Tserkezis, A

    C. Tserkezis, A. I. Fernández-Domínguez, P. A. Gonçalves, F. Todisco, J. D. Cox, K. Busch, N. Stenger, S. I. Bozhevolnyi, 25 N. A. Mortensen, and C. Wolff, On the applicability of quantum-optical concepts in strong-coupling nanophotonics, Reports Prog. Phys.83, (2020)

    2020

  5. [13]

    X. Liu, T. Galfsky, Z. Sun, F. Xia, E.-c. Lin, Y.-H. Lee, S. Kéna-Cohen, and V. M. Menon, Strong light–matter coupling in two-dimensional atomic crystals, Nat. Photonics9, 30 (2015)

    2015

  6. [14]

    Dufferwiel, S

    S. Dufferwiel, S. Schwarz, F. Withers, A. A. P. Trichet, F. Li, M. Sich, O. Del Pozo-Zamudio, C. Clark, A. Nalitov, D. D. Solnyshkov, G. Malpuech, K. S. Novoselov, J. M. Smith, M. S. Skolnick, D. N. Krizhanovskii, and A. I. Tartakovskii, Exciton–polaritons in van der Waals het...

    2015

  7. [15]

    Sidler, P

    M. Sidler, P. Back, O. Cotlet, A. Srivastava, T. Fink, M. Kroner, E. Demler, and A. Imamoglu, Fermi polaron-polaritons in charge-tunable atomically thin semiconductors, Nat. Phys.13, 255 (2017)

    2017

  8. [16]

    Zhang, R

    L. Zhang, R. Gogna, W. Burg, E. Tutuc, and H. Deng, Photonic-crystal exciton-polaritons in monolayer semiconductors, Nat. Commun.9, 713 (2018)

    2018

  9. [17]

    Lackner, M

    L. Lackner, M. Dusel, O. A. Egorov, B. Han, H. Knopf, F. Eilenberger, S. Schröder, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, S. Tongay, C. Anton-Solanas, S. Höfling, and C. Schneider, Tunable exciton-polaritons emerging from WS2 monolayer excitons in a photonic lattice at room temperature, N...

    2021

  10. [18]

    H. Shan, I. Iorsh, B. Han, C. Rupprecht, H. Knopf, F. Eilenberger, M. Esmann, K. Yumigeta, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, S. Klembt, S. Höfling, S. Tongay, C. Antón-Solanas, I. A. Shelykh, and C. Schneider, Brightening of a dark monolayer semiconductor via strong light-matter coup...

    2022

  11. [19]

    M. Qin, J. Duan, S. Xiao, W. Liu, T. Yu, T. Wang, and Q. Liao, Manipulating strong coupling between exciton and quasibound states in the continuum resonance, Phys. Rev. B105, 195425 (2022)

    2022

  12. [20]

    Zheng, Y

    H. Zheng, Y. Bai, Q. Zhang, and S. Liu, Multi-mode strong coupling in Fabry-Perot cavity-WS 2 photonic crystal hybrid structures, Opt. Express31, 24976 (2023)

    2023

  13. [21]

    Maggiolini, L

    E. Maggiolini, L. Polimeno, F. Todisco, A. Di Renzo, B. Han, M. De Giorgi, V. Ardizzone, C. Schneider, R. Mastria, A. Cannavale, M. Pugliese, L. De Marco, A. Rizzo, V. Maiorano, G. Gigli, D. Gerace, D. Sanvitto, and D. Ballarini, Strongly enhanced light–matter coupling of mono...

    2023

  14. [22]

    D. R. Danielsen, N. Lassaline, S. J. Linde, M. V. Nielsen, X. Zambrana-Puyalto, A. Sarbajna, D. H. Nguyen, T. J. Booth, N. Leitherer-Stenger, and S. Raza, Fourier-Tailored Light–Matter Coupling in van der Waals Heterostructures, ACS Nano 10.1021/acsnano.5c02025 (2025)

    2025 doi

  15. [23]

    Sortino, J

    L. Sortino, J. Biechteler, L. Lafeta, L. Kühner, A. Hartschuh, L. d. S. Menezes, S. A. Maier, and A. Tittl, Van der Waals heterostructure metasurfaces: atomic-layer assembly of ultrathin optical cavities, arXiv:2407.16480

    arXiv

  16. [24]

    R. B. Iyer, Y. Luan, R. Shinar, J. Shinar, and Z. Fei, Nano-optical imaging of exciton–plasmon polaritons in WSe2/Au heterostructures, Nanoscale14, 15663 (2022)

    2022

  17. [25]

    L. N. Casses, B. Zhou, Q. Lin, A. Tan, D.-P. Bendixen-Fernex de Mongex, K. J. Kaltenecker, S. Xiao, M. Wubs, and N. Stenger, Full Quantitative Near-Field Characterization of Strongly Coupled Exciton–Plasmon Polaritons in Thin- Layered WSe 2 on a Monocrystalline Gold Platelet, ...

    2024

  18. [26]

    J. Wen, H. Wang, W. Wang, Z. Deng, C. Zhuang, Y. Zhang, F. Liu, J. She, J. Chen, H. Chen, S. Deng, and N. Xu, Room-Temperature Strong Light–Matter Interaction with Active Control in Single Plasmonic Nanorod Coupled with Two-Dimensional Atomic Crystals, Nano Lett.17, 4689 (2017)

    2017

  19. [27]

    Stührenberg, B

    M. Stührenberg, B. Munkhbat, D. G. Baranov, J. Cuadra, A. B. Yankovich, T. J. Antosiewicz, E. Olsson, and T. Shegai, Strong Light-Matter Coupling between Plasmons in Individual Gold Bi-pyramids and Excitons in Mono- and Multilayer WSe2, Nano Lett.18, 5938 (2018)

    2018

  20. [28]

    Geisler, X

    M. Geisler, X. Cui, J. Wang, T. Rindzevicius, L. Gammelgaard, B. S. Jessen, P. A. D. Gonçalves, F. Todisco, P. Bøggild, A. Boisen, M. Wubs, N. A. Mortensen, S. Xiao, and N. Stenger, Single-Crystalline Gold Nanodisks on WS 2 Mono- and Multilayers for Strong Coupling at Room Tem...

    2019

  21. [29]

    Munkhbat, D

    B. Munkhbat, D. G. Baranov, A. Bisht, M. A. Hoque, B. Karpiak, S. P. Dash, and T. Shegai, Electrical Control of Hybrid Monolayer Tungsten Disulfide–Plasmonic Nanoantenna Light–Matter States at Cryogenic and Room Temperatures, ACS Nano 14, 1196 (2020)

    2020

  22. [30]

    Painter, R

    O. Painter, R. K. Lee, A. Scherer, A. Yariv, J. D. O’Brien, P. D. Dapkus, and I. Kim, Two-dimensional photonic band-gap defect mode laser, Science284, 1819 (1999)

    1999

  23. [31]

    Akahane, T

    Y. Akahane, T. Asano, B. S. Song, and S. Noda, High-Q photonic nanocavity in a two-dimensional photonic crystal, Nature 425, 944 (2003)

    2003

  24. [32]

    Y. Ota, R. Katsumi, K. Watanabe, S. Iwamoto, and Y. Arakawa, Topological photonic crystal nanocavity laser, Commun. Phys. 1, 86 (2018)

    2018

  25. [33]

    Ruppert, B

    C. Ruppert, B. Aslan, and T. F. Heinz, Optical Properties and Band Gap of Single- and Few-Layer MoTe 2 Crystals, Nano Lett.14, 6231 (2014)

    2014

  26. [34]

    H. Fang, J. Liu, Q. Lin, R. Su, Y. Wei, T. F. Krauss, J. Li, Y. Wang, and X. Wang, Laser-Like Emission from a Sandwiched MoTe2 Heterostructure on a Silicon Single-Mode Resonator, Adv. Opt. Mater.7, 5 (2019). 26

    2019

  27. [35]

    Rosser, D

    D. Rosser, D. Gerace, Y. Chen, Y. Liu, J. Whitehead, A. Ryou, L. C. Andreani, and A. Majumdar, Dispersive coupling between MoSe2 and an integrated zero-dimensional nanocavity, Opt. Mater. Express12, 59 (2022)

    2022

  28. [36]

    C. Qian, V. Villafañe, P. Soubelet, A. Hötger, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, N. P. Wilson, A. V. Stier, A. W. Holleitner, and J. J. Finley, Nonlocal Exciton-Photon Interactions in Hybrid High-Q Beam Nanocavities with Encapsulated MoS2 Monolayers, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 237403 (2022)

    2022

  29. [37]

    J. T. Robinson, C. Manolatou, L. Chen, and M. Lipson, Ultrasmall Mode Volumes in Dielectric Optical Microcavities, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 143901 (2005)

    2005

  30. [38]

    Hu and S

    S. Hu and S. M. Weiss, Design of Photonic Crystal Cavities for Extreme Light Concentration, ACS Photonics3, 1647 (2016)

    2016

  31. [39]

    H. Choi, M. Heuck, and D. Englund, Self-Similar Nanocavity Design with Ultrasmall Mode Volume for Single-Photon Nonlinearities, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 223605 (2017)

    2017

  32. [40]

    Adv.4, (2018)

    S.Hu, M.Khater, R.Salas-Montiel, E.Kratschmer, S.Engelmann, W.M.Green,andS.M.Weiss,Experimentalrealization of deep-subwavelength confinement in dielectric optical resonators, Sci. Adv.4, (2018)

    2018

  33. [41]

    A. N. Babar, T. A. S. Weis, K. Tsoukalas, S. Kadkhodazadeh, G. Arregui, B. Vosoughi Lahijani, and S. Stobbe, Self- assembled photonic cavities with atomic-scale confinement, Nature624, 57 (2023)

    2023

  34. [42]

    Albrechtsen, B

    M. Albrechtsen, B. Vosoughi Lahijani, R. E. Christiansen, V. T. H. Nguyen, L. N. Casses, S. E. Hansen, N. Stenger, O. Sigmund, H. Jansen, J. Mørk, and S. Stobbe, Nanometer-scale photon confinement in topology-optimized dielectric cavities, Nat. Commun.13, 6281 (2022)

    2022

  35. [43]

    Xiong, R

    M. Xiong, R. E. Christiansen, F. Schröder, Y. Yu, L. N. Casses, E. Semenova, K. Yvind, N. Stenger, O. Sigmund, and J. Mørk, Experimental realization of deep sub-wavelength confinement of light in a topology-optimized InP nanocavity, Opt. Mater. Express14, 397 (2024)

    2024

  36. [44]

    J. S. Jensen and O. Sigmund, Topology optimization for nano-photonics, Laser Photonics Rev.5, 308 (2011)

    2011

  37. [45]

    Molesky, Z

    S. Molesky, Z. Lin, A. Y. Piggott, W. Jin, J. Vucković, and A. W. Rodriguez, Inverse design in nanophotonics, Nat. Photonics 12, 659 (2018)

    2018

  38. [46]

    F. Wang, R. E. Christiansen, Y. Yu, J. Mørk, and O. Sigmund, Maximizing the quality factor to mode volume ratio for ultra-small photonic crystal cavities, Appl. Phys. Lett.113, (2018)

    2018

  39. [47]

    Wang and Y

    F. Wang and Y. R. Shen, General properties of local plasmons in metal nanostructures, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 1 (2006)

    2006

  40. [48]

    G. V. Naik, V. M. Shalaev, and A. Boltasseva, Alternative plasmonic materials: Beyond gold and silver, Adv. Mater.25, 3264 (2013)

    2013

  41. [49]

    J. B. Khurgin, How to deal with the loss in plasmonics and metamaterials, Nat. Nanotechnol.10, 2 (2015)

    2015

  42. [50]

    M. V. Gurrieri, E. V. Denning, K. Seegert, P. T. Kristensen, and J. Mørk, Dynamics and condensation of polaritons in an optical nanocavity coupled to two-dimensional materials, Phys. Rev. B109, 1 (2024)

    2024

  43. [51]

    Abutoama, G

    M. Abutoama, G. Kountouris, J. Mørk, and P. T. Kristensen, Modal approach to the coupling strength of quantum emitters in electromagnetic resonators, Phys. Rev. B110, 195434 (2024)

    2024

  44. [52]

    G. Dong, A. N. Babar, R. E. Christiansen, S. E. Hansen, S. Stobbe, Y. Yu, and J. Mørk, Enhancement and speed-up of carrier dynamics in a dielectric nanocavity with deep sub-wavelength confinement, arXiv:2412.08471

    arXiv

  45. [53]

    Kountouris, A

    G. Kountouris, A. S. Darket, L. Vestergaard, E. V. Denning, J. Mørk, and P. T. Kristensen, Lithographically defined quantum dot with subwavelength confinement of light, Phys. Rev. B110, L241301 (2024)

    2024

  46. [54]

    Xiong, Y

    M. Xiong, Y. Yu, Y. Berdnikov, S. K. Borregaard, A. H. Dubré, E. Semenova, K. Yvind, and J. Mørk, A nanolaser with extreme dielectric confinement, arXiv:2412.02844

    arXiv

  47. [55]

    Momma and F

    K. Momma and F. Izumi, VESTA 3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data, J. Appl. Crystallogr.44, 1272 (2011)

    2011

  48. [56]

    A. Jain, S. P. Ong, G. Hautier, W. Chen, W. D. Richards, S. Dacek, S. Cholia, D. Gunter, D. Skinner, G. Ceder, and K. A. Persson, Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Mater.1, (2013)

    2013

  49. [57]

    Besga, C

    B. Besga, C. Vaneph, J. Reichel, J. Estève, A. Reinhard, J. Miguel-Sánchez, A. Imamoğlu, and T. Volz, Polariton Boxes in a Tunable Fiber Cavity, Phys. Rev. Appl.3, 014008 (2015)

    2015

  50. [58]

    Muñoz-Matutano, A

    G. Muñoz-Matutano, A. Wood, M. Johnsson, X. Vidal, B. Q. Baragiola, A. Reinhard, A. Lemaître, J. Bloch, A. Amo, G. Nogues, B. Besga, M. Richard, and T. Volz, Emergence of quantum correlations from interacting fibre-cavity polaritons, Nat. Mater.18, 213 (2019)

    2019

  51. [59]

    E. V. Denning, M. Wubs, N. Stenger, J. Mørk, and P. T. Kristensen, Quantum theory of two-dimensional materials coupled to electromagnetic resonators, Phys. Rev. B105, 85306 (2022)

    2022

  52. [60]

    Bamba, A

    M. Bamba, A. Imamoğlu, I. Carusotto, and C. Ciuti, Origin of strong photon antibunching in weakly nonlinear photonic molecules, Phys. Rev. A83, 21802 (2011)

    2011

  53. [61]

    A. Ryou, D. Rosser, A. Saxena, T. Fryett, and A. Majumdar, Strong photon antibunching in weakly nonlinear two- dimensional exciton-polaritons, Phys. Rev. B97, 235307 (2018)

    2018

  54. [62]

    E. V. Denning, M. Wubs, N. Stenger, J. Mørk, and P. T. Kristensen, Cavity-induced exciton localization and polariton 27 blockade in two-dimensional semiconductors coupled to an electromagnetic resonator, Phys. Rev. Res.4, L012020 (2022)

    2022

  55. [63]

    Kyriienko, D

    O. Kyriienko, D. N. Krizhanovskii, and I. A. Shelykh, Nonlinear Quantum Optics with Trion Polaritons in 2D Monolayers: Conventional and Unconventional Photon Blockade, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 197402 (2020)

    2020

  56. [64]

    Delteil, T

    A. Delteil, T. Fink, A. Schade, S. Höfling, C. Schneider, and A. İmamoğlu, Towards polariton blockade of confined exciton–polaritons, Nat. Mater.18, 219 (2019)

    2019

  57. [65]

    D. Xiao, G. B. Liu, W. Feng, X. Xu, and W. Yao, Coupled spin and valley physics in monolayers of MoS 2 and other group-VI dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 1 (2012)

    2012

  58. [66]

    K. F. Mak, K. He, J. Shan, and T. F. Heinz, Control of valley polarization in monolayer MoS2 by optical helicity, Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 494 (2012)

    2012

  59. [67]

    L. Yang, N. A. Sinitsyn, W. Chen, J. Yuan, J. Zhang, J. Lou, and S. A. Crooker, Long-lived nanosecond spin relaxation and spin coherence of electrons in monolayer MoS2 and WS2, Nat. Phys.11, 830 (2015)

    2015

  60. [68]

    C. F. Fong, Y. Ota, Y. Arakawa, S. Iwamoto, and Y. K. Kato, Chiral modes near exceptional points in symmetry broken H1 photonic crystal cavities, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 043096 (2021)

    2021

  61. [69]

    Cheben, R

    P. Cheben, R. Halir, J. H. Schmid, H. A. Atwater, and D. R. Smith, Subwavelength integrated photonics, Nature560, 565 (2018)

    2018

  62. [70]

    J. Wang, F. Sciarrino, A. Laing, and M. G. Thompson, Integrated photonic quantum technologies, Nat. Photonics14, 273 (2020)

    2020

  63. [71]

    B. Chen, H. Sahin, A. Suslu, L. Ding, M. I. Bertoni, F. M. Peeters, and S. Tongay, Environmental Changes in MoTe 2 Excitonic Dynamics by Defects-Activated Molecular Interaction, ACS Nano9, 5326 (2015)

    2015

  64. [72]

    O. A. Ajayi, J. V. Ardelean, G. D. Shepard, J. Wang, A. Antony, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, T. F. Heinz, S. Strauf, X. Y. Zhu, and J. C. Hone, Approaching the intrinsic photoluminescence linewidth in transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers, 2D Mater.4, (2017)

    2017

  65. [73]

    Cadiz, E

    F. Cadiz, E. Courtade, C. Robert, G. Wang, Y. Shen, H. Cai, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, H. Carrere, D. Lagarde, M. Manca, T. Amand, P. Renucci, S. Tongay, X. Marie, and B. Urbaszek, Excitonic Linewidth Approaching the Homo- geneous Limit in MoS2-Based van der Waals Heterostruct...

    2017

  66. [74]

    B. Han, C. Robert, E. Courtade, M. Manca, S. Shree, T. Amand, P. Renucci, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, X. Marie, L. E. Golub, M. M. Glazov, and B. Urbaszek, Exciton States in Monolayer MoSe2 and MoTe2 Probed by Upconversion Spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. X8, 1 (2018)

    2018

  67. [75]

    Kountouris, J

    G. Kountouris, J. Mørk, E. V. Denning, and P. T. Kristensen, Modal properties of dielectric bowtie cavities with deep sub-wavelength confinement, Opt. Express30, 40367 (2022)

    2022

  68. [76]

    E. S. C. Ching, P. T. Leung, A. Maassen van den Brink, W. M. Suen, S. S. Tong, and K. Young, Quasinormal-mode expansion for waves in open systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.70, 1545 (1998)

    1998

  69. [77]

    E.A.Muljarov, W.Langbein,andR.Zimmermann,Brillouin-Wignerperturbationtheoryinopenelectromagneticsystems, EPL (Europhysics Lett.92, 50010 (2010)

    2010

  70. [78]

    P. T. Kristensen and S. Hughes, Modes and Mode Volumes of Leaky Optical Cavities and Plasmonic Nanoresonators, ACS Photonics1, 2 (2013)

    2013

  71. [79]

    Lalanne, W

    P. Lalanne, W. Yan, K. Vynck, C. Sauvan, and J. Hugonin, Light Interaction with Photonic and Plasmonic Resonances, Laser Photon. Rev.12, 1 (2018)

    2018

  72. [80]

    P. T. Kristensen, K. Herrmann, F. Intravaia, and K. Busch, Modeling electromagnetic resonators using quasinormal modes, Adv. Opt. Photonics12, 612 (2020)

    2020

  73. [81]

    Both and T

    S. Both and T. Weiss, Resonant states and their role in nanophotonics, Semicond. Sci. Technol.37, 013002 (2021)

    2021

  74. [82]

    Dimopoulos, A

    E. Dimopoulos, A. Sakanas, A. Marchevsky, M. Xiong, Y. Yu, E. Semenova, J. Mørk, and K. Yvind, Electrically-Driven Photonic Crystal Lasers with Ultra-low Threshold, Laser Photon. Rev.16, 1 (2022)

    2022

  75. [83]

    Schröder, M

    F. Schröder, M. P. van Exter, M. Xiong, G. Kountouris, M. Wubs, P. T. Kristensen, and N. Stenger, Confocal polarization tomography of dielectric nanocavities, Nanophotonics 10.1515/nanoph-2024-0744 (2025)

    2025 doi

  76. [84]

    Carlson, R

    C. Carlson, R. Salzwedel, M. Selig, A. Knorr, and S. Hughes, Strong coupling regime and hybrid quasinormal modes from a single plasmonic resonator coupled to a transition metal dichalcogenide monolayer, Phys. Rev. B104, 125424 (2021)

    2021

  77. [85]

    G. D. Pettit and W. J. Turner, Refractive Index of InP, J. Appl. Phys.36, 2081 (1965)

    1965

  78. [86]

    J. A. McCaulley, V. M. Donnelly, M. Vernon, and I. Taha, Temperature dependence ofthe near-infrared refractive index of silicon, gallium arsenide, and indium phosphide, Phys. Rev. B49, 7408 (1994)

    1994

  79. [87]

    I. C. Gerber and X. Marie, Dependence of band structure and exciton properties of encapsulated WSe2 monolayers on the hBN-layer thickness, Phys. Rev. B98, 245126 (2018)

    2018

  80. [88]

    Meckbach, J

    L. Meckbach, J. Hader, U. Huttner, J. Neuhaus, J. T. Steiner, T. Stroucken, J. V. Moloney, and S. W. Koch, Ultrafast band-gap renormalization and build-up of optical gain in monolayer MoTe2, Phys. Rev. B101, 1 (2020)

    2020

  81. [89]

    Edalati-Boostan, C

    S. Edalati-Boostan, C. Cocchi, and C. Draxl, MoTe2 as a natural hyperbolic material across the visible and the ultraviolet region, Phys. Rev. Mater.4, 1 (2020)

    2020

  82. [90]

    D. V. Grudinin, G. A. Ermolaev, D. G. Baranov, A. N. Toksumakov, K. V. Voronin, A. S. Slavich, A. A. Vyshnevyy, 28 A. B. Mazitov, I. A. Kruglov, D. A. Ghazaryan, A. V. Arsenin, K. S. Novoselov, and V. S. Volkov, Hexagonal boron nitride nanophotonics: a record-breaking material...

    2023

  83. [91]

    Kutrowska-Girzycka, E

    J. Kutrowska-Girzycka, E. Zieba-Ostój, D. Biegańska, M. Florian, A. Steinhoff, E. Rogowicz, P. Mrowiński, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, C. Gies, S. Tongay, C. Schneider, and M. Syperek, Exploring the effect of dielectric screening on neutral and charged-exciton properties in mono...

    2022

  84. [92]

    L. C. Andreani, G. Panzarini, and J.-M. Gérard, Strong-coupling regime for quantum boxes in pillar microcavities: Theory, Phys. Rev. B60, 13276 (1999)

    1999

  85. [93]

    Todisco, R

    F. Todisco, R. Malureanu, C. Wolff, P. A. D. Gonçalves, A. S. Roberts, N. A. Mortensen, and C. Tserkezis, Magnetic and electric Mie-exciton polaritons in silicon nanodisks, Nanophotonics9, 803 (2020)

    2020

  86. [94]

    O. Bleu, K. Choo, J. Levinsen, and M. M. Parish, Dissipative light-matter coupling and anomalous dispersion in nonideal cavities, Phys. Rev. A109, 1 (2024)

    2024

  87. [95]

    Helmrich, R

    S. Helmrich, R. Schneider, A. W. Achtstein, A. Arora, B. Herzog, S. M. de Vasconcellos, M. Kolarczik, O. Schöps, R. Bratschitsch, U. Woggon, and N. Owschimikow, Exciton–phonon coupling in mono- and bilayer MoTe2, 2D Mater.5, 45007 (2018)

    2018

  88. [96]

    R. V. Gorbachev, I. Riaz, R. R. Nair, R. Jalil, L. Britnell, B. D. Belle, E. W. Hill, K. S. Novoselov, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. K. Geim, and P. Blake, Hunting for Monolayer Boron Nitride: Optical and Raman Signatures, Small7, 465 (2011)

    2011

  89. [97]

    Holm, Atomically precise patterning by thermal scanning probe lithography , Master’s thesis, Technical University of Denmark (2024)

    P. Holm, Atomically precise patterning by thermal scanning probe lithography , Master’s thesis, Technical University of Denmark (2024)

    2024

  90. [98]

    1,10.1088/2053-1583/1/1/011002(2014)

    A.Castellanos-Gomez, M.Buscema, R.Molenaar, V.Singh, L.Janssen, H.S.VanDerZant,andG.A.Steele,Deterministic transferoftwo-dimensionalmaterialsbyall-dryviscoelasticstamping,2DMater. 1,10.1088/2053-1583/1/1/011002(2014)

    2014 doi

  91. [99]

    P. J. Zomer, M. H. Guimarães, J. C. Brant, N. Tombros, and B. J. Van Wees, Fast pick up technique for high quality heterostructures of bilayer graphene and hexagonal boron nitride, Appl. Phys. Lett.105, 10.1063/1.4886096 (2014)

    2014 doi

  92. [100]

    Pizzocchero, L

    F. Pizzocchero, L. Gammelgaard, B. S. Jessen, J. M. Caridad, L. Wang, J. Hone, P. Bøggild, and T. J. Booth, The hot pick-up technique for batch assembly of van der Waals heterostructures, Nat. Commun.7, 10.1038/ncomms11894 (2016)

    2016 doi

  93. [101]

    L. C. Andrews, Special Functions of Mathematics for Engineers , 2nd ed. (SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering and Oxford University Press, 1997)

    1997

  94. [102]

    P. T. Kristensen, R.-C. Ge, and S. Hughes, Normalization of quasinormal modes in leaky optical cavities and plasmonic resonators, Phys. Rev. A92, 053810 (2015)

    2015

  95. [103]

    Haastrup, M

    S. Haastrup, M. Strange, M. Pandey, T. Deilmann, P. S. Schmidt, N. F. Hinsche, M. N. Gjerding, D. Torelli, P. M. Larsen, A. C. Riis-Jensen, J. Gath, K. W. Jacobsen, J. Jørgen Mortensen, T. Olsen, and K. S. Thygesen, The Computational 2D Materials Database: high-throughput mode...

    2018

  96. [104]

    Hu and Z

    F. Hu and Z. Fei, Recent Progress on Exciton Polaritons in Layered Transition-Metal Dichalcogenides, Adv. Opt. Mater. 8, 1 (2020)

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.