Combinatorial Yamabe flow on infinitely triangulated hyperbolic surfaces

Xu Xu; Yuerong Bian

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 31 references

Combinatorial Yamabe flow on infinitely triangulated hyperbolic surfaces

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The hyperbolic combinatorial Yamabe flow is well posed on infinite triangulations.

desk verdict Solid hyperbolic analogue of Ji's infinite-surface combinatorial Yamabe flow, with a genuinely new uniqueness result for the extended flow; the stability proof has a real but repairable pointwise-vs-a.e. gap. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.25691 v1 pith:VBLM6XMB submitted 2026-07-28 math.DG math.GT

Yuerong Bian , Xu Xu This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.DGmath.GT MSC 52C2552C26

keywords combinatorialYamabeflowinfinitelytriangulatedsurfacespiecewisehyperbolicmetricsvertexscalingextendedcurvaturediscretestabilitywell-posedness

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes a well-posedness theory for the hyperbolic combinatorial Yamabe flow on surfaces triangulated by infinitely many triangles. It proves short-time existence of smooth solutions when the initial piecewise hyperbolic metric is uniformly nondegenerate and the vertex degrees are uniformly bounded, and short-time uniqueness under an additional uniform Delaunay condition. Because triangles may degenerate over time, the paper introduces an extended flow driven by a generalized curvature that stays finite at degenerations, and proves this extended flow has a global smooth-in-time solution. It further proves that two global solutions with the same initial data coincide whenever their difference is ℓ¹-summable in time, a stability result that gives uniqueness of the extended flow. The results bring infinite triangulations to the same level of theory that was previously available only for finite triangulations or for the Euclidean background geometry.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by the curvature evolution equation $\frac{dK_i}{dt}=\sum_{j\sim i} W_{ij}(K_j-K_i) - R_i K_i$, where the diffusion weight $W_{ij}$ is the sum of angle-derivatives $\frac{\partial\theta_i^{jk_1}}{\partial u_j}+\frac{\partial\theta_i^{jk_2}}{\partial u_j}$ over the two triangles sharing edge $\{ij\}$, and the reaction coefficient $R_i$ is a signed sum of area derivatives. Under hyperbolic vertex scaling, these quantities have explicit trigonometric expressions, e.g. $W_{ij} = \frac{1}{2\cosh^2(d_{ij}/2)}\left(\tan\frac{\theta_i^{jk_1}+\theta_j^{ik_1}-\theta_{k_1}^{ij}}{2} + \tan\frac{\theta_i^{jk_2}+\theta_j^{ik_2}-\theta_{k_2}^{ij}}{2}\right)$. The $\epsilon$-uniform nondegeneracy bounds the angle denominators away from zero, giving the uniform $C^2$ estimate that yields existence; the $\epsilon$-uniform Delaunay condition makes $W_{ij}>0$ and the reaction negative, giving the maximum-principle uniqueness; the extension of each angle to degenerate configurations defines the extended curvature $\tilde K_i$, whose flows are gradient flows of the extended Ricci energy, whose convexity supplies the monotonicity inequality underlying stability.

What would settle it

Find two global solutions of the extended flow with the same initial data whose difference is not $\ell^1$-summable in time but which separate as time increases; this would falsify the uniqueness theorem. Alternatively, on a bounded-degree infinite triangulation, take an $\epsilon$-uniformly nondegenerate hyperbolic metric and check numerically whether the flow remains smooth up to time $T_0=\delta_0/((2+D)\pi)$; a singularity before that time would falsify the short-time existence theorem.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that discrete curvature flows on infinite triangulations behave like parabolic PDEs. Concretely, the flow $\frac{du_i}{dt}=-K_i$, with $K_i$ the combinatorial curvature of a hyperbolic vertex scaling, has a smooth solution on $[0,T_0]$ whenever the initial metric is $\epsilon$-uniformly nondegenerate and the vertex degree is bounded by $D$, with $T_0$ depending only on $\epsilon$ and $D$; the proof runs the flow on an exhausting sequence of finite subcomplexes and extracts a limit through uniform $C^2$ bounds. Under the extra $\epsilon$-uniform Delaunay condition the difference of two solutions satisfies a discrete heat equation with positive weights and a negative reaction term, so a discrete maximum principle forces the difference to vanish. For longer times the paper switches to the extended curvature $\tilde K_i$, obtained by continuously assigning angle $\pi$ or $0$ to degenerate triangles; the extended flow $\frac{du_i}{dt}=-\tilde K_i$ is the gradient flow of an extended convex Ricci energy and therefore has a global $C^1$ solution. Finally, when two extended-flow solutions differ by a function in $L^1([0,T);\ell^1(V))$, the $\ell^2$ energy of the difference is non-increasing, which yields stability and uniqueness.

Load-bearing premise

The uniqueness of the extended flow depends on the assumption that the difference of two solutions is summable in total size over time, a decay condition the flow is not shown to guarantee, and the proof uses the stronger condition that this sum is finite at every instant.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The short-time existence and uniqueness theorems give the hyperbolic infinite-triangulation analogue of well-posedness for parabolic equations, so the combinatorial Yamabe flow can serve as a tool for constructing discrete uniformizations on noncompact surfaces.
The global existence of the extended flow means the flow can be continued past triangle degenerations without surgery, and the limiting object is a $C^1$ solution of an extended curvature evolution.
The stability estimate provides quantitative continuous dependence on initial data: any two solutions close in $\ell^2$ at time zero stay close at all later times, provided their difference is $\ell^1$-summable.
The uniqueness of the extended flow implies that, among all possible continuations past singularities, the convex-energy gradient flow selects a canonical one whenever the $\ell^1$ condition holds.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The $\ell^1$-in-time assumption in the extended-flow uniqueness theorem is likely stronger than necessary; an energy argument using the boundedness of the curvature might yield stability under merely $\ell^2$ initial closeness, without the summability condition.
The same approximation-plus-limit strategy should apply to other vertex-scaling curvature flows, such as the combinatorial Calabi flow or inversive-distance circle packing flows, on infinite triangulations, provided a convex energy exists.
The locality of the existence time $T_0$ suggests the infinite flow can be approximated well by finite patches, so the theory may be useful for numerical computation of discrete hyperbolic uniformizations.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Quick take: this is a credible, carefully written extension of Ji's Euclidean infinite-surface combinatorial Yamabe flow to the hyperbolic setting, and it adds something Ji did not have—uniqueness for the extended flow. The main theorems are mostly proved. The one real flaw is in Theorem 6.2's proof: it uses pointwise ℓ¹ finiteness of u(t)−v(t) at an arbitrary t, but the standing assumption is only L¹-in-time integrability. That is a genuine gap in the written argument, though an easily repairable one—Lemma 6.3 already gives absolute continuity that lets you run the monotonicity inequality almost everywhere and then integrate. The stress-test note's example shows the gap is real, not pedantic.

What is actually new: Theorems 1.4–1.6 are the hyperbolic analogues of [15], but the authors also drop the ε-Delaunay condition from the short-time existence theorem, which is a real improvement. Theorem 1.7, the uniqueness/stability of the extended flow, is not in [15] at all. That is the most interesting result in the paper. The proof strategy is coherent: finite-subcomplex approximations, Arzelà–Ascoli, boundary-term control via ℓ¹ summability, and a convexity-based monotonicity inequality.

What is good: the paper is honest about what is quoted. Proposition 2.2 is quoted from Chow–Luo without proof; that is standard and acceptable, though a one-line indication would help. The appendix fully verifies Lemma 3.1, which is the kind of tedious but load-bearing computation that should be checked, and they printed it. No circularity that I can see. The citation pattern is normal—several self-citations point to their own prior work on vertex scaling, but the new claims do not reduce by definition.

The soft spot beyond Theorem 6.2: the L¹-in-time condition (21) is a global decay condition not derived from the geometry. That keeps Theorem 1.7 a conditional stability statement. For a uniqueness theorem, you would want to know whether the condition is necessary or can be replaced by something geometric. That is a limitation of the result, not a flaw in the proof.

Who this is for: people working in discrete conformal geometry, combinatorial curvature flows, and infinite triangulations. It deserves a serious referee: the claims are plausible, the methods are sound, and the gap in Section 6 is repairable. A referee should ask for the a.e. fix and a remark on the integrability condition. I would send it to review.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a well-posedness theory for the hyperbolic combinatorial Yamabe flow on infinitely triangulated surfaces. Under a uniform degree bound and an ε-uniformly nondegenerate initial PH metric, Theorem 1.4 establishes short-time existence of smooth solutions via a finite-subcomplex approximation and a diagonal Arzelà–Ascoli argument. With an additional ε-uniformly Delaunay condition, Theorem 1.5 proves short-time uniqueness using a discrete maximum principle. To handle degenerating triangles, the authors introduce an extended flow with generalized curvature and prove global C^1 existence in Theorem 1.6. The main new result, Theorem 1.7, asserts uniqueness of solutions to the extended flow under the integrability condition u−v∈L^1([0,T);ℓ^1(V)), and it is derived as a consequence of the stability estimate Theorem 6.2. The appendix contains a detailed proof of the geometric perturbation Lemma 3.1.

Significance. If the results are correct, the paper provides the first well-posedness theory for the hyperbolic combinatorial Yamabe flow on infinite triangulations, complementing Ji's Euclidean results [15] and extending them to the hyperbolic setting. The local existence argument avoids the Delaunay assumption for existence, and the stability/uniqueness theorem for the extended flow is new even compared with the Euclidean case (Remark 6.4). A notable strength is that the proof of the key perturbation lemma (Lemma 3.1) is carried out in full detail in the appendix, and the main theorems are stated with explicit hypotheses. However, the stability proof in Section 6 contains a genuine but repairable gap, and Proposition 2.2 is quoted without proof; these issues need to be fixed before the central claims can be considered fully established.

major comments (2)

[Section 6, proof of Theorem 6.2 (Eqs. (21)–(24))] The proof fixes an arbitrary t∈[0,T) and uses the pointwise finiteness of ∥u(t)−v(t)∥ℓ1(V) to choose a finite set P whose ℓ1-complement has norm less than ε, which is then used to show the boundary term vanishes in (23) and to obtain the monotonicity inequality (24). However, the hypothesis (21) only states u−v∈L^1([0,T);ℓ^1(V)), which implies ∥u(t)−v(t)∥ℓ1(V)<∞ almost everywhere but not for every t. Thus the proof does not justify (24) for all t as written. This is load-bearing for Theorem 1.7. The gap is repairable: since Lemma 6.3 makes E(t) absolutely continuous, one can derive (24) for almost every t, use dE/dt≤0 a.e., and then integrate to conclude E(t)≤E(0) for every t. The authors should modify this step explicitly.
[Section 2, Proposition 2.2 (Eq. (6))] The curvature evolution formula (6) is stated with the remark 'The proof is identical to that in [4, Proposition 3.2], so we omit the details.' This formula is used in Remark 2.3 to derive equation (8), which is essential for the uniform C^2 estimate in the proof of Theorem 1.4. Since [4] concerns finite-dimensional ODE systems and the present paper treats infinite triangulations in hyperbolic background geometry, the applicability of [4, Proposition 3.2] should be justified explicitly. At minimum, the authors should provide a precise statement of the cited result and explain why it carries over verbatim, or include the derivation of the hyperbolic evolution equation.

minor comments (5)

[Section 3, proof of Theorem 1.4 (Eqs. (13), (17))] The index in 'the sequence {u^{[n]}_j(t)}∞_{i=1}' should be n, not i, and the notation 'sup_i' in (13) and (17) is undefined. These appear to be typographical errors that should be corrected.
[Section 5, proof of Theorem 1.6] The estimate '(2+D)πT' uses a constant D that is not defined in the statement of Theorem 1.6, which does not assume a uniform degree bound. The bound should depend on deg(j), e.g., (2+deg(j))πT.
[Section 6, Theorem 6.2] In the proof, E(t)=Σ_i(u_i(t)−v_i(t))^2, and the assumption ∥u(0)−v(0)∥ℓ2(V)<ε implies E(0)<ε^2, not E(0)<ε as written. The conclusion should be adjusted accordingly; the monotonicity argument still proves the stated stability estimate after this correction.
[Section 3, finite-subcomplex construction] The relationship between the finite vertex sets V_n and the subcomplex T_n (defined via combinatorial balls B_n(i)) is not fully specified. In particular, it would help to state explicitly that V_n = V(T_n) or that T_n is the induced subcomplex on V_n, to avoid ambiguity in the boundary terms.
[Abstract and Introduction] The phrase 'some integrability condition' in the abstract is vague; Theorem 1.7 makes it precise, but the abstract could state u−v∈L^1([0,T);ℓ^1(V)) directly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the main theorems are proved from explicit a priori estimates, an external maximum principle, and convex-energy arguments; the only flagged concern is a repairable proof gap, not circularity.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are derived rather than assumed. Short-time existence (Theorem 1.4) is obtained from explicit uniform C^2 bounds on finite-subcomplex approximants and an Arzelà–Ascoli diagonal limit, with the nondegeneracy condition used only to control angle and derivative bounds. Uniqueness (Theorem 1.5) follows from a maximum principle imported from Ge–Hua–Zhou [8], with the epsilon-uniform Delaunay condition used to prove positivity of the edge weights and negativity of the zero-order term; these are verified geometrically, not assumed in the conclusion. The extended flow's global existence (Theorem 1.6) is proved by a separate exhaustion argument using boundedness of the extended curvature and a weak-derivative regularity lemma; it is not an immediate consequence of the definition of the extended curvature on infinite graphs. The stability and uniqueness result (Theorem 6.2 and Theorem 1.7) uses the convexity and monotonicity of the extended Ricci energy imported from Bobenko–Pinkall–Springborn [3] and Xu–Zheng [25]; these are prior published results whose assumptions do not include the theorem being proved, so they constitute independent support rather than circular self-citation. The self-citations in the paper, chiefly [24] and [25], are used for rigidity, admissible-space structure, and finite-surface uniqueness context, not as a substitute for the new infinite-surface arguments. The manuscript does contain a genuine proof gap in Theorem 6.2: the hypothesis (21) only gives u(t)-v(t) in ell^1 for almost every t, while the proof invokes pointwise ell^1 finiteness for an arbitrary fixed t. This is a correctness issue in the written proof, repairable by working almost everywhere using Lemma 6.3, and it is not a circularity: the monotonicity inequality (24) is derived from convexity and the vanishing-boundary argument, not assumed as the conclusion. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no central claim reduces by definition to its own inputs. Therefore the appropriate circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no free parameters fitted to data and no new physical or geometric entities. The extended curvature is a continuous extension of ordinary curvature from [3, 25]. All results are conditional on explicit hypotheses on the triangulation and initial metric.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption The triangulation T is locally finite.
Stated in the introduction; it ensures curvature at each vertex depends only on finitely many triangles and allows finite truncations V_n.
domain assumption Vertex degree is uniformly bounded: deg(i) <= D for all i in V.
Assumed in Theorems 1.4, 1.5, and 1.7; used to bound curvature, edge weights, and boundary terms uniformly.
domain assumption The initial PH metric d0 is epsilon-uniformly nondegenerate: every interior angle is at least epsilon > 0.
Used in Lemma 3.1 to control angle change under small conformal factors, giving the existence time T0(epsilon, D).
domain assumption For the uniqueness theorem, the initial metric is epsilon-uniformly Delaunay.
Needed so that interpolated metrics stay Delaunay, making edge weights positive and the reaction term negative in Lemma 4.3.
domain assumption For extended-flow uniqueness, u - v is in L^1([0,T); ell^1(V)) for every T > 0.
Assumption (21) in Theorem 1.7; used to make boundary terms vanish and to justify term-by-term differentiation of the energy series.
domain assumption The extended triangle energy E_tilde_ijk is C^1 concave and extends the Ricci energy continuously, as established in [3].
Quoted from Bobenko-Pinkall-Springborn [3]; underlies the convexity of E_tilde_n used in the monotonicity inequality (22).

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Combinatorial Yamabe flow on infinitely triangulated hyperbolic surfaces." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VBLM6XMB

@misc{pith2026260725691,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Combinatorial Yamabe flow on infinitely triangulated hyperbolic surfaces},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VBLM6XMB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.25691}
}

abstract

We study the combinatorial Yamabe flow on infinitely triangulated surfaces with piecewise hyperbolic metrics. Under the assumptions of uniformly bounded vertex degree and $\epsilon$-uniformly nondegenerate initial metric, we first establish the short-time existence of smooth solutions to the combinatorial Yamabe flow. Under the additional $\epsilon$-uniformly Delaunay condition on the initial metric, we further obtain the short-time uniqueness of solutions to the flow. To address the potential degeneration of triangles along the evolution, we introduce an extended flow with generalized curvature, and establish the global existence of solutions to the extended flow. Furthermore, under uniformly bounded vertex degrees and some integrability condition, we establish the uniqueness of solutions to this extended flow, which follows from the stability property of the solutions. These results provide a well-posedness theory for both the hyperbolic combinatorial Yamabe flow (locally in time) and its extended flow (globally in time) on infinitely triangulated surfaces.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

[15]

B. H. Ji,The existence and uniqueness of infinite combinatorial Yamabe flows. arXiv:2507.12355v1 [math.DG]

work page Pith review arXiv
[4]

B. Chow, F. Luo,Combinatorial Ricci flows on surfaces. J. Differential Geom. 63 (2003), no. 1, 97–129

work page 2003
[1]

A. I. Bobenko and C. O. R. Lutz,Decorated discrete conformal maps and convex polyhedral cusps, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN2024, no. 12, 9505–9534

work page
[2]

A. I. Bobenko and C. O. R. Lutz,Decorated discrete conformal equivalence in non-Euclidean geometries, Discrete Comput. Geom. (2025), doi:10.1007/s00454-025-00749-y

work page doi:10.1007/s00454-025-00749-y 2025
[3]

A. I. Bobenko, U. Pinkall, B. A. Springborn,Discrete conformal maps and ideal hyperbolic poly- hedra. Geom. Topol. 19 (2015), no. 4, 2155–2215

work page 2015
[5]

L. C. Evans,Partial differential equations. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1998

work page 1998
[6]

Ge,Combinatorial Methods and Geometric Equations

H. Ge,Combinatorial Methods and Geometric Equations. Ph.D. Thesis, Peking University, Bei- jing, 2012

work page 2012
[7]

H. Ge, B. Hua,3-dimensional combinatorial Yamabe flow in hyperbolic background geometry. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 373 (2020), no. 7, 5111-5140

work page 2020

Show all 31 references

[8]

H. Ge, B. Hua, P. C. Zhou,Combinatorial Ricci flows on infinite disk triangulations. arXiv:2504.05817v1 [math.DG]

arXiv
[9]

Glickenstein, J

D. Glickenstein, J. Thomas,Duality structures and discrete conformal variations of piecewise constant curvature surfaces. Adv. Math. 320 (2017), 250–278

2017
[10]

X. D. Gu, R. Guo, F. Luo, J. Sun, T. Wu,A discrete uniformization theorem for polyhedral surfaces II. J. Differential Geom. 109 (2018), no. 2, 431–466

2018
[11]

X. D. Gu, F. Luo, J. Sun, T. Wu,A discrete uniformization theorem for polyhedral surfaces. J. Differential Geom. 109 (2018), no. 2, 223–256

2018
[12]

X. D. Gu, F. Luo, T. Wu,Convergence of discrete conformal geometry and computation of uni- formization maps. Asian J. Math. 23 (2019), no. 1, 21–34

2019
[13]

X. D. Gu, S. T. Yau,Computational conformal geometry. Advanced Lectures in Mathematics, p. vi+295. International Press, Higher Education Press, Beijing, Somerville, MA, 2008

2008
[14]

Guo,Combinatorial Yamabe flow on hyperbolic surfaces with boundary

R. Guo,Combinatorial Yamabe flow on hyperbolic surfaces with boundary. Commun. Contemp. Math. 13 (2011), no. 5, 827–842

2011
[16]

Leibon,Characterizing the Delaunay decompositions of compact hyperbolic surfaces

G. Leibon,Characterizing the Delaunay decompositions of compact hyperbolic surfaces. Geom. Topol. 6 (2002), 361–391. 24 YUERONG BIAN, XU XU

2002
[17]

Luo,Combinatorial Yamabe flow on surfaces

F. Luo,Combinatorial Yamabe flow on surfaces. Commun. Contemp. Math. 6 (2004), no. 5, 765–780

2004
[18]

F. Luo, J. Sun, T. Wu,Discrete conformal geometry of polyhedral surfaces and its convergence. Geom. Topol. 26 (2022), no. 3, 937–987

2022
[19]

L. S. Pontryagin,Ordinary differential equations. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Inc., Reading, 1962

1962
[20]

R ˇocek, R

M. R ˇocek, R. M. Williams,The quantization of Regge calculus. Z. Phys. C Part. Fields 21 (1984), no. 4, 371–381

1984
[21]

Wu,A discrete approach to the prescribed Gaussian curvature problem

T. Wu,A discrete approach to the prescribed Gaussian curvature problem. arXiv:2312.11877v1 [math.GT]
[22]

T. Wu, X. Xu,Fractional combinatorial Calabi flow on surfaces. arXiv:2107.14102v1 [math.GT]

arXiv
[23]

T. Wu, X. Zhu,The convergence of discrete uniformizations for closed surfaces. J. Differential Geom. 127 (2024), no. 3, 1305–1343

2024
[24]

Xu,Deformation of discrete conformal structures on surfaces

X. Xu,Deformation of discrete conformal structures on surfaces. Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 63 (2024), Paper No. 38, 21 pp

2024
[25]

X. Xu, C. Zheng,A new proof for global rigidity of vertex scaling on polyhedral surfaces. Asian J. Math. 25 (2021), no. 6, 883–896

2021
[26]

X. Xu, C. Zheng,Parameterized discrete uniformization theorems and curvature flows for poly- hedral surfaces, II. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 375 (2022), no. 4, 2763–2788

2022
[27]

Xu and C

X. Xu and C. Zheng,Combinatorial curvature flows with surgery for inversive distance circle packings on surfaces, arXiv:2308.02271v1 [math.GT]

arXiv
[28]

Xu and C

X. Xu and C. Zheng,Combinatorial curvature flows with surgery for hyperbolic inversive dis- tance circle packings on surfaces, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations64(2025), no. 9, Paper No. 225, 31 pp

2025
[29]

Zhang, R

M. Zhang, R. Guo, W. Zeng, F. Luo, S. T. Yau, X. D. Gu,The unified discrete surface Ricci flow. Graph. Models 76 (2014), 321–339

2014
[30]

X. Zhu, X. Xu,Combinatorial Calabi flow with surgery on surfaces. Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ. 58 (2019), no. 6, Paper No. 195, 20 pp

2019
[31]

Zhou,Real Analysis, 3rd edition

M. Zhou,Real Analysis, 3rd edition. Peking University Press, 2016. SCHOOL OFMATHEMATICS ANDSTATISTICS, WUHANUNIVERSITY, WUHAN, 430072, P.R.CHINA Email address:yuerongbian@whu.edu.cn SCHOOL OFMATHEMATICS ANDSTATISTICS, WUHANUNIVERSITY, WUHAN, 430072, P.R.CHINA Email address:xux...

2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [15]

B. H. Ji,The existence and uniqueness of infinite combinatorial Yamabe flows. arXiv:2507.12355v1 [math.DG]

work page Pith review arXiv

[2] [4]

B. Chow, F. Luo,Combinatorial Ricci flows on surfaces. J. Differential Geom. 63 (2003), no. 1, 97–129

work page 2003

[3] [1]

A. I. Bobenko and C. O. R. Lutz,Decorated discrete conformal maps and convex polyhedral cusps, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN2024, no. 12, 9505–9534

work page

[4] [2]

A. I. Bobenko and C. O. R. Lutz,Decorated discrete conformal equivalence in non-Euclidean geometries, Discrete Comput. Geom. (2025), doi:10.1007/s00454-025-00749-y

work page doi:10.1007/s00454-025-00749-y 2025

[5] [3]

A. I. Bobenko, U. Pinkall, B. A. Springborn,Discrete conformal maps and ideal hyperbolic poly- hedra. Geom. Topol. 19 (2015), no. 4, 2155–2215

work page 2015

[6] [5]

L. C. Evans,Partial differential equations. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1998

work page 1998

[7] [6]

Ge,Combinatorial Methods and Geometric Equations

H. Ge,Combinatorial Methods and Geometric Equations. Ph.D. Thesis, Peking University, Bei- jing, 2012

work page 2012

[8] [7]

H. Ge, B. Hua,3-dimensional combinatorial Yamabe flow in hyperbolic background geometry. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 373 (2020), no. 7, 5111-5140

work page 2020