Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

CHIME/FRB Discovery of an Unusual Circularly Polarized Long-Period Radio Transient with an Accelerating Spin Period

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A 14-minute radio transient is the first of its kind to spin up, and it shines in nearly pure circular polarization.

desk verdict Solid discovery paper with strong polarization evidence and an honestly hedged but not yet established spin-up claim; needs a missing reference and a careful timing-model discussion. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.05139 v2 pith:VCHYWI5H submitted 2025-07-07 astro-ph.HE

Fengqiu Adam Dong , Kaitlyn Shin , Casey Law , Mason Ng , Ingrid Stairs , Geoffrey Bower , Alyssa Cassity , Emmanuel Fonseca
show 15 more authors
B. M. Gaensler Jason W. T. Hessels Victoria M. Kaspi Bikash Kharel Calvin Leung Robert A. Main Kiyoshi W. Masui James W. McKee Bradley W. Meyers Obinna Modilim Ayush Pandhi Aaron B Pearlman Scott M. Ransom Paul Scholz Kendrick Smith
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords long-periodradiotransientsCHIMEJ1634+44circularpolarizationspin-upneutronstarpulsartiminggravitationalwavebinariesastronomy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the discovery of CHIME J1634+44, a long-period radio transient that pulses every 841 seconds yet shows a strongly negative period derivative, $\dot{P}=-9.03(0.11)\times10^{-12}$ s s$^{-1}$, the first significant spin-up seen in this class. It also finds that the bursts are more than 90% circularly polarized at CHIME frequencies and at least 98% circularly polarized in VLA images, a property previously seen in only a handful of neutron-star sources such as FRB 20201124A and giant pulses from PSR B1937+21. The authors argue that this favors pulsar-like coherent emission rather than white-dwarf-pulsar mechanisms, and that the spin-up points to a companion: either accretion onto the object or, if the radio period is locked to the orbit, orbital decay through gravitational-wave emission. The discovery matters because it pushes the LPT population into a regime where near-total circular polarization and an accelerating period must be explained by any viable emission model.

What carries the argument

The central object is the phase-connected timing model built from 127 burst arrival times and fitted with a period $P = 841.245895(6)$ s and a period derivative $\dot{P}=-9.03(0.11)\times10^{-12}$ s s$^{-1}$, together with a fixed $0.3$ s inter-instrument offset between the CHIME/FRB and CHIME/Pulsar datasets. This model converts sporadic, seconds-long bursts into a coherent spin ephemeris that can be extrapolated across roughly four years, so the claim that the period is accelerating rests entirely on it. The supporting measurements are the VLA RR/LL images giving a $\gtrsim98\%$ circular-polarization fraction and the CHIME Stokes $V$ data giving $\vert V\vert/I\gtrsim0.9$, which together anchor the paper's conclusion that the emission is pulsar-like.

What would settle it

Refit the same 127 arrival times with a full binary model that also fits the 4206-second envelope or a candidate 2103-second orbit, and check whether the negative $\dot{P}$ collapses toward zero while the residuals become white; alternatively, detect orbital Doppler shifts in burst arrival times that vary with the 4206-second phase. Either observation would settle whether the spin-up is intrinsic to a single rotating object.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes CHIME J1634+44 as the first long-period radio transient with fully circularly polarized bursts and the first with a significant negative period derivative. A phase-connected timing solution over 127 arrival times from the CHIME/FRB and CHIME/Pulsar instruments, the GBT, and the VLA yields $P = 841.245895(6)$ s and $\dot{P}=-9.03(0.11)\times10^{-12}$ s s$^{-1}$; VLA images show the source only in the RR correlation product, implying at least 98% circular polarization, and CHIME baseband data give $\vert V\vert/I\gtrsim0.9$ for all bursts. The bursts cluster on a secondary 4206-second pattern that is not phase connected, which the authors interpret as evidence for binary activity rather than a simple interpulse structure. They conclude that the emission is pulsar-like, that the source is more likely a neutron star than a white dwarf, and that the spin-up is probably driven either by accretion from a companion or, in the spin-orbit-locked interpretation, by gravitational-wave orbital decay with a chirp mass of about 0.36 solar masses.

Load-bearing premise

The spin-up claim assumes the 841-second period belongs to a single rotating source whose arrival times are explained by just one period and one period derivative; if the source is actually in an unmodeled binary orbit, or its bursts jitter from timing noise, the fitted spin-up could be partly or entirely apparent.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • CHIME J1634+44 becomes a new reference point for LPT emission models: any theory must produce near-total circular polarization at luminosities comparable to those of radio pulsars.
  • If the 841-second period is the spin, the negative period derivative places CHIME J1634+44 among the rare radio sources that gain rotational energy, most plausibly by accreting matter from a companion.
  • If the radio period is locked to the binary orbit, the timing yields a chirp mass of about 0.36 solar masses and a gravitational-wave merger timescale of about 1.1 million years, making the system a candidate for future space-based gravitational-wave observatories.
  • The 4206-second bursting pattern, which has a chance probability of $3.5\times10^{-9}$ under a simple 841-second model, implies additional physics such as a spin-orbit resonance or an unseen orbital companion.
  • The Swift X-ray upper limits rule out an actively flaring magnetar but leave open a rotation-powered neutron star or a low-luminosity intermediate polar, sharpening the search for the true nature of the source.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the spin-up is genuine and accretion-driven, CHIME J1634+44 could be a missing link between long-period radio transients and transitional millisecond pulsars; monitoring its X-ray and optical brightness for modulation at the 841-second period would test that connection.
  • The 4206-second pattern could be a beat between the spin and an unseen orbit; if so, the beat phase should drift measurably over several years, which would distinguish a spin-orbit resonance from a fixed interpulse geometry.
  • The gravitational-wave interpretation predicts a specific orbital period derivative, so continued timing that measures a second derivative of the period could confirm whether the negative $\dot{P}$ represents orbital decay rather than accretion.
  • A systematic search for Stokes V in other long-period radio transients is a direct way to learn whether near-100% circular polarization is a common trait of the class or a peculiarity of CHIME J1634+44.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports the discovery of CHIME J1634+44, a long-period radio transient with a 841.245895(6) s period and a period derivative of -9.03(0.11)e-12 s/s from a phase-connected timing solution of 127 TOAs. The authors report a VLA RR-only detection implying a high circular polarization fraction, CHIME baseband polarimetry showing |V|/I >~0.9, a secondary 4206 s bursting pattern, X-ray upper limits, and an optical candidate. They argue the source is likely a neutron-star-like system, and discuss accretion or gravitational-wave-driven orbital decay as explanations for the negative period derivative. The paper presents the source as the first LPT with significant spin-up and the first with fully circularly polarized bursts.

Significance. If the timing and polarization claims hold, CHIME J1634+44 is an important addition to the LPT population, potentially linking LPTs to binary evolution and gravitational-wave sources. The paper is strong in its use of multi-wavelength data, transparent discussion of caveats, and public data/code release. The circular polarization measurement is remarkable, and the source will be a key target for future studies. However, the central spin-up claim depends on a single-rotator timing model that is explicitly challenged by the paper's own evidence for a 4206 s pattern, so the headline result needs additional validation or more careful framing.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 5, Table 1; Section 6.3] The phase-connected timing solution in Table 1 fits only P, Pdot, and a fixed inter-instrument offset to 127 TOAs (Section 5). The paper nevertheless reports a 4206 s bursting pattern whose excess over the 841 s model has probability 3.5e-9 (Appendix B), residual phase scatter of ~2% of the period, and states that 'additional, unknown physical mechanisms' are needed. These are exactly the conditions under which an unmodeled binary orbital acceleration (e.g., the 4206 s or 2103 s periods discussed in Section 6.4) or timing noise can bias the fitted Pdot. The >80 sigma significance is therefore formal under the single-rotator model and does not by itself establish that -9.03e-12 s/s is an intrinsic spin-up of the rotating source. Because 'first LPT with a significant spin-up' is a headline claim in the abstract, the authors should either (a) search for binary orbital parameters in the TOAs and show the Pdot remains significant, or (b) explicitly relabel the measurement as an apparent spin-up and move the interpretation to a conditional statement.
  2. [Section 3; Appendix A.4] In Section 3, the VLA measurement gives a mean RR flux of 77 +/- 1 mJy and a 3-sigma upper limit of 1.8 mJy on LL. The standard fractional circular polarization is |V|/I = (RR-LL)/(RR+LL), which yields a lower limit of about 95% (=(77-1.8)/(77+1.8)), not 98% as stated. If the 98% figure comes from RR/(RR+LL), the definition should be given. In addition, the CHIME baseband analysis in Appendix A.4 reports only |V|/I >~0.9 and |L|/I >~0.2, notes ~20% instrumental circular polarization, and states exact fractions are not reported. Since 'fully circularly polarized' is one of the two central claims, the authors should report the exact values and uncertainties (or a corrected, clearly defined lower limit) in the main text.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 2] The text says 'beginning on MJD 60270 (2023 November 22)' and later says 'the first detection made with CHIME/Pulsar was on MJD 60270 (2023 December 23)'; these two calendar dates for the same MJD are inconsistent, so one should be corrected.
  2. [Section 5] The text states that the residual scatter is 'about 2% of the period' while Table 1 gives an RMS residual of 0.0055 phase (0.55%) and the text later says 'still small compared to the period (≲|1|%)'; these numbers should be reconciled.
  3. [Equation (1)] Equation (1) has typesetting issues: 'π(8/3)' and '(2f)(11/3)' should be 'π^{8/3}' and '(2f)^{11/3}' to be readable.
  4. [Section 2; Appendix C] The X-ray luminosity upper limit in Section 2 is given as 'LX < 1.3 - 5.2 x 10^32 ergs s^-1' while Appendix C and Section 6.2 give 5.2 x 10^31 and 1.3 x 10^32 erg s^-1; the exponent or range in Section 2 appears to be off by a factor of 10.
  5. [Appendix B] The simulation of the 4206 s pattern assumes a 50% burst probability at each 841 s epoch within activity windows; the significance of the observed pattern should be tested against other values of this ad-hoc probability to demonstrate robustness.
  6. [Section 6.4] The statement that there is 'no evidence for the specific configuration proposed by Bloot et al. (2025)' would be more compelling if accompanied by a quantitative upper limit or a description of the search performed in the timing data.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No equation-level circularity: P and Pdot are fitted to TOAs, and derived quantities are conditional interpretations; self-citations are methodological only.

full rationale

The paper's central derived quantities, P = 841.245895(6) s and Pdot = -9.03(0.11) x 10^-12 s s^-1, are fitted to 127 TOAs in a standard timing model, and the chirp mass, merger timescale, and semi-major axis are then computed from the standard gravitational-wave formula (Eq. 1) using those fitted values. The chirp mass is not used to predict P or Pdot, so there is no reduction of a 'prediction' to an input by construction. The spin-up interpretation is explicitly conditional: the abstract states 'If the period was only associated with the spin of the object,' and the paper acknowledges residual scatter and a statistically significant 4206 s bursting pattern that may indicate binary activity or unmodeled physics (Section 6.4, Appendix B). These are modeling caveats that weaken the spin-up claim, not circularity. The polarization claim is a direct measurement, and the 'pulsar-like' emission conclusion is supported by external comparisons (FRB 20201124A, PSR B1937+21) rather than by assuming the conclusion. Self-citations (Dong et al. 2024; Dong 2024) are limited to methodology such as TOA extraction, naming conventions, and flux calibration, and are not load-bearing for the central result. No uniqueness theorem, ansatz-smuggling, or renaming of a known result is present. Therefore no circular step meets the evidentiary standard of Eq. X = Eq. Y by construction or fitted parameter renamed as prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on fitted values for P, Pdot, DM, and the inter-instrument offset, plus assumptions that the 841 s period is the spin period and that propagation and instrumental effects do not create the circular polarization. These are standard practice for pulsar timing and polarimetry but are not independently verified here. The chirp mass and merger timescale are conditional calculations from the standard gravitational-wave formula.

free parameters (6)
  • Pulse period P = 841.245895(6) s
    Fitted to 127 TOAs with PINT; the central timing claim depends on it.
  • Period derivative Pdot = -9.03(0.11) x 10^-12 s/s
    Fitted simultaneously with P; significance is greater than 80 sigma under the 841 s phase-connected model.
  • Dispersion measure DM = 25.0(2) pc cm^-3
    Estimated via DM-time power spectrum variance; used to infer the 1.4-3 kpc distance and luminosity limits.
  • Inter-instrument timing offset = 0.3(3) s
    Fitted between CHIME/FRB and CHIME/Pulsar datasets and fixed for the rest of the timing analysis (Section 5).
  • TOA smoothing width = 200 ms
    Gaussian filter applied to burst profiles before TOA extraction (Appendix A.3); affects TOA errors and residual scatter.
  • Activity window definition = 10 days
    Chosen threshold for grouping bursts into activity windows in the 2-day burst pattern simulation (Appendix B.1).
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption The 841 s period is the rotation period of a single emitting object
    Assumed in the PINT timing solution and in the spin-up interpretation; the paper acknowledges the 4206 s pattern and unknown mechanisms in Sections 5 and 6.4.
  • domain assumption Propagation effects do not create the near-total circular polarization
    Argued in Section 6.1 using multi-frequency consistency attributed to Bloot et al. 2025; no direct measurement of Faraday conversion is shown.
  • domain assumption NE2001 and YMW16 DM models give a distance of 1.4-3 kpc
    Used for luminosity and energy estimates in Section 6 and Appendix C; these are empirical models with significant uncertainty.
  • domain assumption The gravitational-wave chirp-mass scenario assumes a circular orbit decaying purely by gravitational radiation
    Explicitly stated in Section 6.3 before integrating Equation 1 to derive the chirp mass and merger timescale.
  • ad hoc to paper The burst-pattern simulation assumes a 50% burst probability at each 841 s epoch within activity windows
    Step 4 of Appendix B.1; no emission model supports this prior, so the 3.5e-9 chance probability depends on it.
  • standard math Standard pulsar timing and barycentering (PINT) correctly model the TOAs
    Used for all timing fits; standard practice in pulsar astronomy but not independently verified for this source.
  • standard math Kepler's third law and the quadrupole gravitational-wave formula apply to the putative binary
    Used to derive the chirp mass, semi-major axis, and merger timescale in Section 6.3.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of CHIME/FRB Discovery of an Unusual Circularly Polarized Long-Period Radio Transient with an Accelerating Spin Period." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VCHYWI5H

@misc{pith2026250705139,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: CHIME/FRB Discovery of an Unusual Circularly Polarized Long-Period Radio Transient with an Accelerating Spin Period},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VCHYWI5H}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.05139}
}
abstract

We report the discovery of CHIME J1634+44, a Long Period Radio Transient (LPT) unique for two aspects: it is the first known LPT to emit fully circularly polarized radio bursts, and it is the first LPT with a significant spin-up. Given that high circular polarization ($>90$\%) has been observed in FRB~20201124A and in some giant pulses of PSR~B1937+21, we discuss the implications of the high circular polarization of CHIME J1634+44 and conclude its emission mechanism is likely to be ``pulsar-like''. While CHIME J1634+44 has a pulse period of 841 s, its burst arrival patterns are indicative of a secondary 4206 s period, probably associated with binary activity. The timing properties suggest it has a significantly negative period derivative of $\dot{P}=-9.03(0.11)\times 10^{-12}$ s s$^{-1}$. Few systems have been known to spin-up, most notably transitional millisecond pulsars and cataclysmic binaries, both of which seem unlikely progenitors for CHIME J1634+44. If the period was only associated with the spin of the object, then the spin up is likely generated by accretion of material from a companion. If, however, the radio pulse period and the orbital period are locked, as appears to be the case for two other LPTs, the spin up of CHIME J1634+44 could be driven by gravitational wave radiation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.05139 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Sample of a detection made with the CHIME/Pulsar instrument. The top panel shows the dedis￾persed flux-calibrated frequency-averaged profile. The red line is the smoothed profile for TOA extraction, the middle panel shows the dedispersed dynamic spectrum, and the bot￾tom panel shows the DM-time power spectrum. The title is the MJD the burst was detected, following the convention in Dong et al. (2024). CHIME is a tra… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. VLA radio continuum images of the LL and RR correlation products toward CHIME J1634+44. The images were made from visibilities selected from the entire 9 s triggered data time span and frequencies from 1328 to 1456 MHz. The source is only significantly detected in RR polarization, which is consistent with 100% circular polarization. We find a best-fit source position with a statistical er￾ror of 0.3′′ using the RR i… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Archival optical imaging from HSC, smoothed and centered on the VLA/realfast localization for CHIME J1634+44; up is North and left is East. The g-band image from the PDR3, and the r - and i-band images are from the HSCLA. Overlaid on the images are 1-σ, 2-σ, and 3-σ con￾tours in bold, solid, and dashed lines. The possible optical source is at the bottom of the 3-σ contours, most visible in the g- and r -band images … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Residuals for a 841 s period. The error bars are 1σ. The right panel shows a zoomed-in image of the densest portion of TOAs when all instruments were observing CHIME J1634+44. The arrows show offsets possibly due to timing noise between burst as discussed in the text. …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Example of a DM-time power spectrum from burst 60311A, detected by CHIME/Pulsar between 400-800 MHz. The bottom panel shows the variance across the DM of the top panel. A. DETECTIONS We provide tables for all the detections from CHIME/FRB, CHIME/Pulsar, the GBT, and th…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Dynamic spectrum for a portion of the first burst of CHIME J1634+44 seen by VLA/realfast. The realfast search system detected this burst at the boundary of a buffer, so this plot only shows the second half of the first burst. The three panels show the RR, RR+LL (Stokes…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: An example of the autocorrelation function and the FFT power spectrum from burst 60309A. The top panel shows the raw autocorrelation function normalized to 1. The middle panel shows a subtraction of the exponentially decaying baseline, an approximation to the red noise…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Left panel: A histogram of all the quasiperiods measured for CHIME J1634+44. Right panel: The relationship between quasiperiodicity and period. Due to the log scale, the errors at the rightmost of this figure are large. J1634+44 does not fall within the neutron star qu…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: TOA residuals for all the detections made given a 4206 s period, without any phase jumps included. This shows that all bursts are arriving at a multiple of 841 s, that is, bursts arrive at multiples of 0.2 in phase. The colors represent the phase bins to which they bel…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The distribution of the number of odd-day burst separations for 1,000,000 simulations of 60 burst pairs. The red line shows the observed number of odd burst separations. C. SWIFT X-RAY AND UV Upon the detection of an activity period beginning in MJD 60270 (2023 Novemb…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A new long period radio transient: Discovery of pulses repeating every 1.16 hours from ASKAP J175534.9-252749.1

    astro-ph.HE 2025-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    ASKAP J175534.9-252749.1 is confirmed as a long period radio transient with a period of 4186.3285 seconds (about 1.16 hours), based on new multi-telescope detections and a timing solution.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    2022, PASJ, 74, 247, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psab122

    Aihara, H., AlSayyad, Y., Ando, M., et al. 2022, PASJ, 74, 247, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psab122

    doi:10.1093/pasj/psab122 2022

  2. [2]

    C., Patel, C., Brar, C., et al

    Andersen, B. C., Patel, C., Brar, C., et al. 2023, AJ, 166, 138, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/acec78

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/acec78 2023

  3. [3]

    Singh, K. P. 2020, Advances in Space Research, 66, 1226, doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2020.04.007

    doi:10.1016/j.asr.2020.04.007 2020

  4. [4]

    2023, MNRAS, 520, 1872, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad208

    Beniamini, P., Wadiasingh, Z., Hare, J., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 520, 1872, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad208

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stad208 2023

  5. [5]

    D., Ravi, V., Belov, K

    Bochenek, C. D., Ravi, V., Belov, K. V., et al. 2020, Nature, 587, 59, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2872-x

    doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2872-x 2020

  6. [6]

    A., & de Bruyn, A

    Brentjens, M. A., & de Bruyn, A. G. 2005, A&A, 441, 1217, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20052990

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20052990 2005

  7. [7]

    Buckley, D. A. H., Meintjes, P. J., Potter, S. B., Marsh, T. R., & G¨ ansicke, B. T. 2017, Nature Astronomy, 1, 0029, doi: 10.1038/s41550-016-0029

    doi:10.1038/s41550-016-0029 2017

  8. [8]

    B., Coughlin, M

    Burdge, K. B., Coughlin, M. W., Fuller, J., et al. 2019a, Nature, 571, 528, doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1403-0

    doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1403-0

Show all 80 references
  1. [9]

    B., Fuller, J., Phinney, E

    Burdge, K. B., Fuller, J., Phinney, E. S., et al. 2019b, ApJL, 886, L12, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab53e5

    doi

  2. [10]

    Burn, B. J. 1966, MNRAS, 133, 67, doi: 10.1093/mnras/133.1.67

    1966 doi

  3. [11]

    2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 828, doi: 10.1038/s41550-022-01688-x

    Caleb, M., Heywood, I., Rajwade, K., et al. 2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 828, doi: 10.1038/s41550-022-01688-x

    2022 doi

  4. [12]

    L., et al

    Caleb, M., Lenc, E., Kaplan, D. L., et al. 2024, Nature Astronomy, 8, 1159, doi: 10.1038/s41550-024-02277-w CHIME Collaboration, Amiri, M., Bandura, K., et al. 2022, ApJS, 261, 29, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac6fd9 CHIME/FRB Collaboration, Amiri, M., Bandura, K., et al. 2018, ApJ,...

    2024 doi

  5. [13]

    A., Taylor, J

    Cognard, I., Shrauner, J. A., Taylor, J. H., & Thorsett, S. E. 1996, ApJL, 457, L81, doi: 10.1086/309894

    1996 doi

  6. [14]

    M., & Lazio, T

    Cordes, J. M., & Lazio, T. J. W. 2002, arXiv e-prints, astro, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0207156 Coti Zelati, F., Rea, N., Pons, J. A., Campana, S., &

    2002 doi arXiv

  7. [15]

    2018, MNRAS, 474, 961, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2679

    Esposito, P. 2018, MNRAS, 474, 961, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2679

    2018 doi

  8. [16]

    2003, A&A, 410, L9, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20031368 de Ruiter, I., Rajwade, K

    Cusumano, G., Hermsen, W., Kramer, M., et al. 2003, A&A, 410, L9, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20031368 de Ruiter, I., Rajwade, K. M., Bassa, C. G., et al. 2025, Nature Astronomy, doi: 10.1038/s41550-025-02491-0

    2003 doi

  9. [17]

    2024, PhD thesis, University of British Columbia, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14288/1.0445624

    Dong, F. 2024, PhD thesis, University of British Columbia, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14288/1.0445624

    2024 doi

  10. [18]

    A., Clarke, T., Curtin, A

    Dong, F. A., Clarke, T., Curtin, A. P., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.07480, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2407.07480

    2024 doi arXiv

  11. [19]

    Dulk, G. A. 1985, ARA&A, 23, 169, doi: 10.1146/annurev.aa.23.090185.001125

    1985

  12. [20]

    2021, Science, 372, 187, doi: 10.1126/science.abd4659

    Enoto, T., Terasawa, T., Kisaka, S., et al. 2021, Science, 372, 187, doi: 10.1126/science.abd4659

    2021 doi

  13. [21]

    A., Page, K

    Evans, P. A., Page, K. L., Osborne, J. P., et al. 2020, ApJS, 247, 54, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab7db9

    2020 doi

  14. [22]

    2005, A&A, 444, 15, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20053472

    Falanga, M., Kuiper, L., Poutanen, J., et al. 2005, A&A, 444, 15, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20053472

    2005 doi

  15. [23]

    G., et al

    Hallinan, G., Antonova, A., Doyle, J. G., et al. 2008, ApJ, 684, 644, doi: 10.1086/590360

    2008 doi

  16. [24]

    2007, ApJL, 663, L25, doi: 10.1086/519790

    Hallinan, G., Bourke, S., Lane, C., et al. 2007, ApJL, 663, L25, doi: 10.1086/519790

    2007 doi

  17. [25]

    L., Manchester, R

    Han, J. L., Manchester, R. N., Xu, R. X., & Qiao, G. J. 1998, MNRAS, 300, 373, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01869.x

    1998

  18. [26]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

    2020 doi

  19. [27]

    Haslam, C. G. T., Salter, C. J., Stoffel, H., & Wilson, W. E. 1982, A&AS, 47, 1

    1982

  20. [28]

    Y., & Kaspi, V

    He, C., Ng, C. Y., & Kaspi, V. M. 2013, ApJ, 768, 64, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/768/1/64

    2013 doi

  21. [29]

    J., White, R

    Helfand, D. J., White, R. L., & Becker, R. H. 2015, ApJ, 801, 26, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/801/1/26

    2015 doi

  22. [30]

    Y., & Ho, W

    Hu, C.-P., Ng, C. Y., & Ho, W. C. G. 2019, MNRAS, 485, 4274, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz513

    2019 doi

  23. [31]

    2022, Nature, 601, 526, doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04272-x

    Hurley-Walker, N., Zhang, X., Bahramian, A., et al. 2022, Nature, 601, 526, doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04272-x

    2022 doi

  24. [32]

    J., et al

    Hurley-Walker, N., Rea, N., McSweeney, S. J., et al. 2023, Nature, 619, 487, doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06202-5

    2023 doi

  25. [33]

    J., Bahramian, A., et al

    Hurley-Walker, N., McSweeney, S. J., Bahramian, A., et al. 2024, ApJL, 976, L21, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad890e

    2024 doi

  26. [34]

    S., Betti, S., et al

    Hutschenreuter, S., Anderson, C. S., Betti, S., et al. 2022, A&A, 657, A43, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202140486

    2022 doi

  27. [35]

    Jaodand, A., Hessels, J. W. T., & Archibald, A. 2018, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 337, Pulsar Astrophysics the Next Fifty Years, ed. P. Weltevrede, B. B. P. Perera, L. L. Preston, & S. Sanidas, 47–51, doi: 10.1017/S1743921317010407

    2018 doi

  28. [36]

    C., Xu, J

    Jiang, J. C., Xu, J. W., Niu, J. R., et al. 2024, National Science Review, 12, nwae293, doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwae293 21

    2024 doi

  29. [37]

    W., Marshall, F

    Johnston, S., Romani, R. W., Marshall, F. E., & Zhang, W. 2004, MNRAS, 355, 31, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08286.x

    2004

  30. [38]

    Katz, J. I. 2022, Ap&SS, 367, 108, doi: 10.1007/s10509-022-04146-2

    2022 doi

  31. [39]

    Stappers, B. W. 2024, Nature Astronomy, 8, 230, doi: 10.1038/s41550-023-02125-3

    2024 doi

  32. [40]

    J., Bower, G

    Law, C. J., Bower, G. C., Burke-Spolaor, S., et al. 2018, ApJS, 236, 8, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aab77b

    2018 doi

  33. [41]

    Lee, Y. W. J., Caleb, M., Murphy, T., et al. 2025, Nature Astronomy, 9, 393, doi: 10.1038/s41550-024-02452-z

    2025 doi

  34. [42]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.15739, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2411.15739

    Li, D., Yuan, M., Wu, L., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.15739, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2411.15739

    2024 doi

  35. [43]

    K., Bray, J

    Lo, K. K., Bray, J. D., Hobbs, G., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 421, 3316, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20555.x

    2012

  36. [44]

    R., & Kramer, M

    Lorimer, D. R., & Kramer, M. 2012, Handbook of Pulsar Astronomy

    2012

  37. [45]

    2021, ApJ, 911, 45, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abe62f

    Luo, J., Ransom, S., Demorest, P., et al. 2021, ApJ, 911, 45, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abe62f

    2021 doi

  38. [46]

    Manoharan, P. K. 2019, ApJL, 882, L9, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab3a47

    2019 doi

  39. [47]

    N., & Lyne, A

    Manchester, R. N., & Lyne, A. G. 1977, MNRAS, 181, 761, doi: 10.1093/mnras/181.4.761

    1977 doi

  40. [48]

    N., & Taylor, J

    Manchester, R. N., & Taylor, J. H. 1977, Pulsars

    1977

  41. [49]

    S., Zarka, P., Echer, E., et al

    Marques, M. S., Zarka, P., Echer, E., et al. 2017, A&A, 604, A17, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201630025

    2017 doi

  42. [50]

    R., G¨ ansicke, B

    Marsh, T. R., G¨ ansicke, B. T., H¨ ummerich, S., et al. 2016, Nature, 537, 374, doi: 10.1038/nature18620

    2016 doi

  43. [51]

    C., Fanson, J., Schiminovich, D., et al

    Martin, D. C., Fanson, J., Schiminovich, D., et al. 2005, ApJL, 619, L1, doi: 10.1086/426387

    2005 doi

  44. [52]

    2021, ApJ, 920, 138, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac126a

    Mckinven, R., Michilli, D., Masui, K., et al. 2021, ApJ, 920, 138, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac126a

    2021 doi

  45. [53]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2402.09304, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2402.09304

    Mckinven, R., Bhardwaj, M., Eftekhari, T., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2402.09304, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2402.09304

    2024 doi arXiv

  46. [54]

    W., Mckinven, R., et al

    Michilli, D., Masui, K. W., Mckinven, R., et al. 2021, ApJ, 910, 147, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abe626

    2021 doi

  47. [55]

    2025, Nature, 637, 48, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-08297-w

    Nimmo, K., Pleunis, Z., Beniamini, P., et al. 2025, Nature, 637, 48, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-08297-w

    2025 doi

  48. [56]

    A., Zhu, W

    Olausen, S. A., Zhu, W. W., Vogel, J. K., et al. 2013, ApJ, 764, 1, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/764/1/1

    2013 doi

  49. [57]

    A., Scaringi, S., Castro Segura, N., et al

    Paice, J. A., Scaringi, S., Castro Segura, N., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 531, L82, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slae035

    2024 doi

  50. [58]

    2024, ApJ, 968, 50, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad40aa

    Pandhi, A., Pleunis, Z., Mckinven, R., et al. 2024, ApJ, 968, 50, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad40aa

    2024 doi

  51. [59]

    2022, in Astrophysics and Space Science Library, Vol

    Papitto, A., & de Martino, D. 2022, in Astrophysics and Space Science Library, Vol. 465, Astrophysics and Space Science Library, ed. S. Bhattacharyya, A. Papitto, & D. Bhattacharya, 157–200, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-85198-9 6

    2022 doi

  52. [60]

    R., Buckley, D

    Pelisoli, I., Marsh, T. R., Buckley, D. A. H., et al. 2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 931, doi: 10.1038/s41550-023-01995-x

    2023 doi

  53. [61]

    S., & Villadsen, J

    Pineda, J. S., & Villadsen, J. 2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 569, doi: 10.1038/s41550-023-01914-0

    2023 doi

  54. [62]

    Gaensler, B. M. 2020, RM-Tools: Rotation measure (RM) synthesis and Stokes QU-fitting, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2005.003

    2020

  55. [63]

    2023, MNRAS, 522, 2448, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1072

    Qu, Y., & Zhang, B. 2023, MNRAS, 522, 2448, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1072

    2023 doi

  56. [64]

    2024, ApJ, 961, 214, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad165d

    Rea, N., Hurley-Walker, N., Pardo-Araujo, C., et al. 2024, ApJ, 961, 214, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad165d

    2024 doi

  57. [65]

    Rodriguez, A. C. 2025, A&A, 695, L8, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202553684

    2025 doi

  58. [66]

    C., Galiullin, I., Gilfanov, M., et al

    Rodriguez, A. C., Galiullin, I., Gilfanov, M., et al. 2023, ApJ, 954, 63, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ace698

    2023 doi

  59. [67]

    Rucinski, S. M. 1994, AcA, 44, 75

    1994

  60. [68]

    2024, ApJ, 976, 115, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7feb

    Salcedo, C., Mori, K., Bridges, G., et al. 2024, ApJ, 976, 115, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7feb

    2024 doi

  61. [69]

    Schaefer, B. E. 2024, ApJ, 966, 155, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad31a9

    2024 doi

  62. [70]

    R., Belloni, D., G¨ ansicke, B

    Schreiber, M. R., Belloni, D., G¨ ansicke, B. T., Parsons, S. G., & Zorotovic, M. 2021, Nature Astronomy, 5, 648, doi: 10.1038/s41550-021-01346-8

    2021 doi

  63. [71]

    W., Tasse, C., Hardcastle, M

    Shimwell, T. W., Tasse, C., Hardcastle, M. J., et al. 2019, A&A, 622, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833559

    2019 doi

  64. [72]

    W., Hardcastle, M

    Shimwell, T. W., Hardcastle, M. J., Tasse, C., et al. 2022, A&A, 659, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142484

    2022 doi

  65. [73]

    Solheim, J. E. 2010, PASP, 122, 1133, doi: 10.1086/656680

    2010 doi

  66. [74]

    2021, PASJ, 73, 735, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psab034

    Tanaka, M., Ikeda, H., Murata, K., et al. 2021, PASJ, 73, 735, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psab034

    2021 doi

  67. [75]

    K., & Ravi, V

    Vedantham, H. K., & Ravi, V. 2019, MNRAS, 485, L78, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slz038

    2019 doi

  68. [76]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.16606, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2411.16606

    Wang, Z., Rea, N., Bao, T., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.16606, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2411.16606

    2024 doi arXiv

  69. [77]

    1995, Cataclysmic variable stars, Vol

    Warner, B. 1995, Cataclysmic variable stars, Vol. 28

    1995

  70. [78]

    L., Becker, R

    White, R. L., Becker, R. H., Helfand, D. J., & Gregg, M. D. 1997, ApJ, 475, 479, doi: 10.1086/303564

    1997 doi

  71. [79]

    1998, Nature, 394, 344, doi: 10.1038/28557

    Wijnands, R., & van der Klis, M. 1998, Nature, 394, 344, doi: 10.1038/28557

    1998 doi

  72. [80]

    M., Manchester, R

    Yao, J. M., Manchester, R. N., & Wang, N. 2017, ApJ, 835, 29, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/835/1/29

    2017 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.