Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-06T15:02:21.839624Z
Paper Citation Record · LEDGER
Can External Validation Tools Improve Annotation Quality for LLM-as-a-Judge?
As of 7 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 35 of 35 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2507.17015.
A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.
Coverage vector
One-hop event checks from named stored sources.
Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00
Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links
A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.
Source: cited_works
Reference resolution
35 of 35 outbound references displayed
- verified exact1
- verified fuzzy2
- unresolved32
- parse uncertain0
- malformed identifier0
- metadata mismatch0
External citation measurements
No source-named external measurement is stored.
Outbound references
Observation 4b92e2cb-d69e-4275-a323-e9cd285741d7 · outbound
This paper cites Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback.
Can External Validation Tools Improve Annotation Quality for LLM-as-a-Judge? Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback
Reference 1
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T15:02:21.677894Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 7c29cf48-4c00-4b26-80f0-b9c83b4cd5ec · outbound
This paper cites LLMs instead of Human Judges? A Large Scale Empirical Study across 20 NLP Evaluation Tasks.
Can External Validation Tools Improve Annotation Quality for LLM-as-a-Judge? LLMs instead of Human Judges? A Large Scale Empirical Study across 20 NLP Evaluation Tasks
Reference 2
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T15:02:21.680804Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 0aeb6484-a2ca-438d-bea8-95f5b98646f7 · outbound
This paper cites The Alternative Annotator Test for LLM-as-a-Judge: How to Statistically Justify Replacing Human Annotators with LLMs.
Can External Validation Tools Improve Annotation Quality for LLM-as-a-Judge? The Alternative Annotator Test for LLM-as-a-Judge: How to Statistically Justify Replacing Human Annotators with LLMs
Reference 3
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T15:02:21.683550Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 696328f2-9cca-404c-8a92-1d7326ee8e1f · outbound
This paper cites ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent Debate.
Can External Validation Tools Improve Annotation Quality for LLM-as-a-Judge? ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent Debate
Reference 4
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T15:02:21.686092Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation afa20a44-b53b-4b25-aa8f-c86217d602f9 · outbound
This paper cites Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code.
Can External Validation Tools Improve Annotation Quality for LLM-as-a-Judge? Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code
Reference 5
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T15:02:21.688614Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 6dbdedf3-427b-4f63-8e0a-0a713190021e · outbound
This paper cites Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preference.
Can External Validation Tools Improve Annotation Quality for LLM-as-a-Judge? Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preference
Reference 6
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T15:02:21.691005Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation dff28471-97c9-4e20-ad21-c8e534565395 · outbound
This paper cites Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems.
Can External Validation Tools Improve Annotation Quality for LLM-as-a-Judge? Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems
Reference 8
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T15:02:21.695714Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 37dccd96-8a34-4014-9f69-893d509bccae · outbound
This paper cites Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluators.
Can External Validation Tools Improve Annotation Quality for LLM-as-a-Judge? Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluators
Reference 9
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T15:02:21.697698Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 1d85940f-12fb-4336-ad9b-4328bb595a0b · outbound
This paper cites Liang, and Tatsunori B.
Can External Validation Tools Improve Annotation Quality for LLM-as-a-Judge? Liang, and Tatsunori B
Reference 10
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:02:22.054590Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.
Observation 203ce50a-051b-4620-9a07-382191bbfa13 · outbound
This paper cites RARR: Researching and Revising What Language Models Say, Using Language Models.
Can External Validation Tools Improve Annotation Quality for LLM-as-a-Judge? RARR: Researching and Revising What Language Models Say, Using Language Models
Reference 11
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T15:02:21.701968Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation d0c9a754-01be-4817-b58d-b83e65452dd9 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Can External Validation Tools Improve Annotation Quality for LLM-as-a-Judge? Unresolved cited work
Reference 12
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:02:22.048575Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.
Observation 085a6dbf-5564-4730-9830-9f82813a9273 · outbound
This paper cites Measuring Coding Challenge Competence With APPS.
Can External Validation Tools Improve Annotation Quality for LLM-as-a-Judge? Measuring Coding Challenge Competence With APPS
Reference 13
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T15:02:21.706245Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation c07ab589-2337-441c-99f3-1e134e3650a2 · outbound
This paper cites Human Feedback is not Gold Standard.
Can External Validation Tools Improve Annotation Quality for LLM-as-a-Judge? Human Feedback is not Gold Standard
Reference 14
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T15:02:21.708169Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation f0871de8-dcc8-40d7-b89e-cd471039a507 · outbound
This paper cites Evaluating Robustness of Reward Models for Mathematical Reasoning.
Can External Validation Tools Improve Annotation Quality for LLM-as-a-Judge? Evaluating Robustness of Reward Models for Mathematical Reasoning
Reference 15
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T15:02:21.710305Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 0b126402-104c-43ad-8713-555261521a8b · outbound
This paper cites The PRISM Alignment Dataset: What Participatory, Representative and Individualised Human Feedback Reveals About the Subjective and Multicultural Alignment of Large Language Models.
Can External Validation Tools Improve Annotation Quality for LLM-as-a-Judge? The PRISM Alignment Dataset: What Participatory, Representative and Individualised Human Feedback Reveals About the Subjective and Multicultural Alignment of Large Language Models
Reference 16
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T15:02:21.712413Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation fc74ba33-dc17-429c-814b-539bd0c51aea · outbound
This paper cites RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models for Language Modeling.
Can External Validation Tools Improve Annotation Quality for LLM-as-a-Judge? RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models for Language Modeling
Reference 17
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T15:02:21.714439Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation c71181a0-27cd-4845-8b1f-fd2b38befa45 · outbound
This paper cites RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedback.
Can External Validation Tools Improve Annotation Quality for LLM-as-a-Judge? RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedback
Reference 18
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T15:02:21.716581Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 02a25f2e-4576-4db9-b428-263a8a3f826c · outbound
This paper cites Tool-Augmented Reward Modeling.
Can External Validation Tools Improve Annotation Quality for LLM-as-a-Judge? Tool-Augmented Reward Modeling
Reference 19
- Resolution
- verified exact
- local_arxiv, observed 2026-08-06T15:02:21.923606Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.
Observation 2fcb3709-63c9-413c-8b21-1428d29b4c64 · outbound
This paper cites From Crowdsourced Data to High-Quality Benchmarks: Arena-Hard and BenchBuilder Pipeline.
Can External Validation Tools Improve Annotation Quality for LLM-as-a-Judge? From Crowdsourced Data to High-Quality Benchmarks: Arena-Hard and BenchBuilder Pipeline
Reference 20
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T15:02:21.721016Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation d199b5c7-5a15-4309-a036-690b3351ff3b · outbound
This paper cites Let's Verify Step by Step.
Can External Validation Tools Improve Annotation Quality for LLM-as-a-Judge? Let's Verify Step by Step
Reference 21
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T15:02:21.723067Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation d14add69-cedc-4091-8fc2-9d9376d3dc99 · outbound
This paper cites TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoods.
Can External Validation Tools Improve Annotation Quality for LLM-as-a-Judge? TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoods
Reference 22
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T15:02:21.725393Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 3d4ab151-4a94-4f2c-8786-c220d4fce449 · outbound
This paper cites G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignment.
Can External Validation Tools Improve Annotation Quality for LLM-as-a-Judge? G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignment
Reference 23
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T15:02:21.727560Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 178e20b4-6ba5-470c-8500-9a67a4705c4a · outbound
This paper cites FActScore: Fine-grained Atomic Evaluation of Factual Precision in Long Form Text Generation.
Can External Validation Tools Improve Annotation Quality for LLM-as-a-Judge? FActScore: Fine-grained Atomic Evaluation of Factual Precision in Long Form Text Generation
Reference 24
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T15:02:21.729653Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation eb1d00de-c94e-4ac2-89c8-b627869962e4 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Can External Validation Tools Improve Annotation Quality for LLM-as-a-Judge? Unresolved cited work
Reference 25
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:02:22.042880Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.
Observation ff84316f-d482-4e36-9d8b-12c0ac14e873 · outbound
This paper cites LLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own Generations.
Can External Validation Tools Improve Annotation Quality for LLM-as-a-Judge? LLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own Generations
Reference 26
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T15:02:21.733580Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 320efc4c-9de5-4aea-b116-406fdd698f44 · outbound
This paper cites Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model.
Can External Validation Tools Improve Annotation Quality for LLM-as-a-Judge? Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model
Reference 27
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T15:02:21.736963Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation b3a45513-346b-4b52-a5cd-055cc172cc3d · outbound
This paper cites Christiano.
Can External Validation Tools Improve Annotation Quality for LLM-as-a-Judge? Christiano
Reference 28
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:02:22.036908Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.
Observation 4684ed4a-4017-48d3-b2cb-e6924d757c0c · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Can External Validation Tools Improve Annotation Quality for LLM-as-a-Judge? Unresolved cited work
Reference 29
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:02:22.030841Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.
Observation 5774f7bf-1076-45a0-be24-1b64bd10c7e4 · outbound
This paper cites Replacing Judges with Juries: Evaluating LLM Generations with a Panel of Diverse Models.
Can External Validation Tools Improve Annotation Quality for LLM-as-a-Judge? Replacing Judges with Juries: Evaluating LLM Generations with a Panel of Diverse Models
Reference 30
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T15:02:21.742842Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation fb4bc773-9123-468b-b86b-bc067f993f38 · outbound
This paper cites Factcheck-Bench: Fine-Grained Evaluation Benchmark for Automatic Fact-checkers.
Can External Validation Tools Improve Annotation Quality for LLM-as-a-Judge? Factcheck-Bench: Fine-Grained Evaluation Benchmark for Automatic Fact-checkers
Reference 31
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T15:02:21.744854Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 2fce3b73-9d30-4887-902c-f4726afa870e · outbound
This paper cites Long-form factuality in large language models.
Can External Validation Tools Improve Annotation Quality for LLM-as-a-Judge? Long-form factuality in large language models
Reference 32
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T15:02:21.746960Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation fec041df-7f0e-4951-9943-7ada0188cf39 · outbound
This paper cites GPT Can Solve Mathematical Problems Without a Calculator.
Can External Validation Tools Improve Annotation Quality for LLM-as-a-Judge? GPT Can Solve Mathematical Problems Without a Calculator
Reference 33
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T15:02:21.749110Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 3cafa3fe-b09b-43de-abd6-af3bd125bee2 · outbound
This paper cites Evaluating Large Language Models at Evaluating Instruction Following.
Can External Validation Tools Improve Annotation Quality for LLM-as-a-Judge? Evaluating Large Language Models at Evaluating Instruction Following
Reference 34
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T15:02:21.751108Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation e2f3ce1e-5da4-49ee-80e9-26575453cac5 · outbound
This paper cites Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena.
Can External Validation Tools Improve Annotation Quality for LLM-as-a-Judge? Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena
Reference 35
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T15:02:21.836882Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation efc4f697-2a27-46e7-8e10-92199032e735 · outbound
This paper cites Agent-as-a-Judge: Evaluate Agents with Agents.
Can External Validation Tools Improve Annotation Quality for LLM-as-a-Judge? Agent-as-a-Judge: Evaluate Agents with Agents
Reference 36
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T15:02:21.839624Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Pith citing papers
No inbound Pith citation observations are available.