Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 203 references

What makes an algebraic curve special?

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that bi-algebraic geometry is the unifying framework: special curves—those with CM Jacobians, Teichmüller curves, or orbit-closure structure—are precisely atypical intersections, and their distribution is controlled by…

desk verdict A useful survey whose advertised new Ax-Schanuel theorem for meromorphic differentials looks false as stated: Theorem 9.4 concludes about W, but the cited input only gives a statement about U, and the stress-test counterexample is convincing. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.06366 v1 pith:VGKN5N3Z submitted 2025-02-10 math.AG math.NT

Gregorio Baldi This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AGmath.NT MSC 14D0714C3014G3522F3030F6032G15
keywords algebraiccurvesmodulispacesHodgetheoryMumford-TategroupsTeichmüllertranslationsurfacesbi-algebraicgeometryZilber-Pinkconjecture
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

What makes an algebraic curve special? This survey's answer is that a curve becomes special when its Jacobian, or its flat translation-surface structure, places it in a bi-algebraic subvariety of the relevant moduli space—a subvariety that is Zariski-closed and also locally algebraic in the period-coordinate model. The paper argues that the Hodge-theoretic notion (CM Jacobians, Shimura subvarieties) and the Teichmüller notion (Teichmüller curves, orbit closures) are two faces of one phenomenon: atypical intersections, whose maximal instances the Zilber-Pink conjecture predicts to be finite. Along the way it gathers the known evidence, states new predictions for real-multiplication loci and the Hodge locus, and sketches an Ax-Schanuel theorem for strata of meromorphic differentials. If the thesis is right, the many different reasons a curve can be 'special' collapse into one arithmetic-geometric principle.

What carries the argument

The central object is the bi-algebraic subvariety: a Zariski-closed subvariety of a moduli space whose inverse image in the period-coordinate universal cover is also algebraic. The workhorse is the Ax-Schanuel theorem, which says that an atypical intersection of an algebraic variety with a flat leaf must project into a weakly special subvariety. For orbit closures of $\mathrm{GL}_2(\mathbb{R})^+$ on $\Omega\mathcal{M}_g(\kappa)$, the machinery encodes the real-multiplication, torsion, and eigenform conditions satisfied by every orbit closure into an algebraic subvariety $E[N]$ of a period torsor, so that orbit closures become atypical intersections; finiteness of maximal atypical intersections then follows from the geometric mixed Zilber-Pink theorem.

What would settle it

Take a stratum of meromorphic differentials with at least one pole, compute its monodromy group, and check directly whether the natural map from the automorphic bundle to relative cohomology is algebraic and equivariant as Theorem 9.4 requires; a single stratum where this map is not algebraic would falsify the theorem. Alternatively, find a Zariski-closed bi-algebraic curve in a meromorphic stratum whose monodromy group is not strictly smaller than the stratum's, contradicting Proposition 9.3.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The core thesis is that bi-algebraic geometry supplies the right definition of special in both Hodge theory and Teichmüller theory. For $\mathcal{M}_g$ and the Hodge bundle $\Omega\mathcal{M}_g(\kappa)$, a subvariety is bi-algebraic if its lift to the universal cover is locally defined by algebraic equations in period coordinates; the claim is that CM Jacobians, sub-Shimura varieties generically contained in the Torelli locus, Teichmüller curves, and $\mathrm{GL}_2(\mathbb{R})^+$-orbit closures are all bi-algebraic, and that the genuinely special ones are atypical intersections. The survey proves or cites that these objects satisfy the same dimensional-excess inequality, and are therefore governed by the Zilber-Pink conjecture; it predicts what ZP implies for real-multiplication loci, and it states a new functional-transcendence result for meromorphic differentials (Theorem 9.4) that would extend the framework to strata with poles.

Load-bearing premise

The newest result, the Ax-Schanuel theorem for meromorphic differentials, is justified by a sketched reduction to an existing theorem, and the factorization on which it depends is asserted rather than proved; if that reduction fails, the survey's extension of the bi-algebraic framework to meromorphic strata is unsupported.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the Zilber-Pink conjecture holds, the Coleman–Oort conjecture (for $g \geq 8$) and the finiteness/emptiness predictions for real-multiplication loci $E_{g,K}$ follow directly.
  • If bi-algebraic subvarieties are the correct special objects, then the finiteness theorem for atypical orbit closures and the classification of curves that are both Shimura and Teichmüller are two instances of one atypical-intersection principle.
  • The Ax-Schanuel theorem for meromorphic differentials, if valid, extends the bi-algebraic framework to strata with poles and yields the Ax-Lindemann theorem for abelian differentials as a corollary.
  • The geometric mixed Zilber-Pink theorem implies that totally geodesic subvarieties generically contained in $\mathcal{M}_g$ are not Zariski-dense for $g \geq 4$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the bi-algebraic thesis is right, it suggests a testable program elsewhere: any moduli space with period coordinates and a flat connection should have its invariant submanifolds described by atypical intersections, so linear Hurwitz spaces and strata of $k$-differentials become natural next cases.
  • The non-linear bi-algebraic curves and surfaces exhibited in the survey show that bi-algebraic does not reduce to linear; computing their monodromy would test the survey's Proposition 9.3, which predicts such curves are weakly special.
  • A failure of the meromorphic Ax-Schanuel reduction would not kill the Hodge-side of the unification, but it would leave the Teichmüller-side extension to poles without its main tool; the two sides would then be unified only in the holomorphic case.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper is a survey, organized in three parts, of the many meanings of 'special' for algebraic curves and subvarieties of moduli spaces. Part 1 reviews the Hodge-theoretic viewpoint: Jacobians, CM and real multiplication, the Coleman-Oort conjecture, the André-Oort theorem, and the Schottky problem. Part 2 surveys the Teichmüller viewpoint: Teichmüller curves, translation surfaces, GL2(R)+ orbit closures, affine invariant submanifolds, and finiteness results such as the Eskin-Filip-Wright theorem. Part 3 develops the bi-algebraic viewpoint and the Zilber-Pink conjecture, reviews Ax-Schanuel results, sketches the atypical-intersection approach to orbit closures in strata of abelian differentials, and states a new theorem (Theorem 9.4) purporting to extend Ax-Schanuel to strata of meromorphic differentials, together with a corollary advertised as Bakker-Tsimerman's Ax-Lindemann for abelian differentials. The central thesis is that bi-algebraic subvarieties provide a unifying framework for special subvarieties in both Hodge theory and Teichmüller theory.

Significance. If judged only on its expository content, the manuscript is a valuable and generally reliable survey: it collects an impressive number of examples, states many known theorems with useful proof sketches, and gives a clear account of how atypical intersections and functional transcendence enter both Shimura and Teichmüller settings. The discussion of orbit closures as atypical intersections in Section 8 and the geometric interpretation of the invariants r, d, t are particularly useful. The paper is honest about its reliance on the author's previous works [22, 24, 25], and no damaging circularity is apparent. However, the manuscript advertises Section 9 as a new contribution, and Theorem 9.4 is the main new theorem there. As stated, that theorem is not merely under-proved; its conclusion is incompatible with the cited Ax-Schanuel input and appears to be false. Since the claim to extend functional transcendence to meromorphic differentials rests on this theorem, the Section 9 contribution cannot be accepted in its present form.

major comments (3)
  1. [§9, Theorem 9.4] The stated conclusion concerns the projection of W to ΩMg(µ), whereas the cited input, Theorem 7.8, and the analogous Ax-Schanuel theorem Theorem 7.10, conclude only about the projection of the analytic component U. This is not a harmless strengthening. For example, let S be an algebraic curve in a meromorphic stratum with full monodromy and with dim H^1 ≥ 3, choose a line L in H^1 passing through a period value of S, and set W = L × S. A zero-dimensional component U of W ∩ Π satisfies dim W − dim U = 2 < dim H^1, so the atypicality hypothesis of Theorem 9.4 holds; the conclusion would then force the projection of W, namely S, into a strict bi-algebraic subvariety, contradicting Proposition 9.3 for S with full monodromy. Thus Theorem 9.4 as stated is false, not merely missing details.
  2. [§9, proof of Theorem 9.4] Even after replacing 'projection of W' by 'projection of U', the proof would still be incomplete. The one-sentence reduction to Theorem 7.8 via the factorization eS → P → H^1 requires verifying that P is an H-principal bundle with a flat H-equivariant connection satisfying the hypotheses of Theorem 7.8, that the second map r is algebraic and H(C)-equivariant, and that ∇-special subvarieties in this setting coincide with bi-algebraic subvarieties. For meromorphic strata the period map takes values in relative cohomology with a mixed Hodge structure, so none of these identifications is formal; they need to be established before Theorem 7.8 can be applied.
  3. [§9, Corollary 9.5] The claimed formal deduction of Bakker-Tsimerman's Ax-Lindemann uses W = Y × π(Y0)^Zar. This only works because Theorem 9.4 asserts a conclusion about the projection of the whole algebraic variety W. If Theorem 9.4 is corrected to the standard projection-of-U formulation, the same argument no longer yields the corollary for an arbitrary algebraic subvariety Y of H^1. The advertised application is therefore coupled to the false stronger formulation of Theorem 9.4 and needs to be re-examined separately.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§2.4, Theorem 2.12] There is a typo: 'If ≥ 2, he group Aut(X)' should read 'If g ≥ 2, the group Aut(X)'.
  2. [§2.5, Theorem 2.16] The genus list contains an out-of-order and repeated entry '57' between '65' and '69'; the list should be checked against [163, Thm. 3.3].
  3. [§5.1.1] The sentence 'unless E is defied over Q' should read 'unless E is defined over Q'.
  4. [§9, Remark 9.2] The statement that meromorphic strata can contain R-linear but non-algebraic manifolds is interesting but vague; it would benefit from a precise statement of the result from [147] and an explicit example or reference to the relevant appendix.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the survey's claims are either external theorems, conditional conjectures, or independently proven results from prior work; the main gap in Theorem 9.4 is a correctness issue, not a self-referential reduction.

full rationale

This paper does not exhibit the circularity patterns enumerated. The bi-algebraic 'unification' is an interpretive thesis, not a derivation: the equivalence of weakly special and bi-algebraic subvarieties is quoted from Moonen and Ullmo-Yafaev (Theorem 7.3), and the special role of bi-algebraic subvarieties is proposed as a research program, not derived from itself. The new claims in Sections 8 and 9 are presented as consequences of the external Ax-Schanuel theorem of Blázquez-Sanz, Casale, Freitag, and Nagloo (Theorem 7.8) and of the author's prior work [22, 25]. Although [25] is self-cited for Theorem 7.16 and for the orbit-closure finiteness result Theorem 8.7, those statements have independent proofs in a separate preprint; citing them here is standard mathematical practice and does not reduce the survey's conclusions to their own definitions. The conjectures in Section 6 are explicitly conditional on Zilber-Pink, not fitted to data or renamed as predictions. The only notable issue is Theorem 9.4: its proof consists of the sentence 'By pulling back to P , we can apply Theorem 7.8', and the stated conclusion concerns the projection of W while the cited theorem's hypothesis and conclusion concern the analytic component U. This is a serious proof gap or possible error, but it is not circularity: Theorem 7.8 is an external input, and the claimed conclusion is not equivalent to the hypothesis by construction. Therefore the paper receives score 0 for circularity, with the correctness caveat about Theorem 9.4 noted separately.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The survey's new results rest on several deep theorems taken as black boxes, most notably the André-Oort theorem, the Ax-Schanuel theorem for VHS, and the Eskin-Mirzakhani-Mohammadi theorem. The conditional results in Section 6.2 assume the Zilber-Pink conjecture. No free parameters or invented entities appear.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math André-Oort theorem for Shimura varieties (Theorem 2.33, from [166, 184])
    Used to equate geometric and arithmetic forms of Coleman-Oort and in several proofs (e.g., proof of Theorem 6.9).
  • standard math Ax-Schanuel theorem for VHS (Theorem 7.10, from [143]) and differential Ax-Schanuel of Blázquez-Sanz et al. (Theorem 7.8, from [28])
    Used to prove the new Ax-Schanuel for meromorphic differentials (Theorem 9.4) and the geometric ZP theorem (Theorem 7.16).
  • domain assumption Zilber-Pink conjecture (Conjecture 6.1)
    Theorems 6.7 and related implications are conditional on ZP; used to derive Conjectures 6.4 and 6.5.
  • standard math Eskin-Mirzakhani-Mohammadi theorem on orbit closures (Theorem 5.2, from [75])
    Underlies the linearity and algebraic structure of orbit closures in Sections 5 and 8.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of What makes an algebraic curve special?." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VGKN5N3Z

@misc{pith2026250206366,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: What makes an algebraic curve special?},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VGKN5N3Z}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.06366}
}
abstract

A survey of special curves, special subvarieties of $\mathcal{M}_g$, and related topics. A large portion of the text discusses various possible interpretation of the word 'special' in this context by giving also concrete examples. One highlight is the bi-algebraic viewpoint for atypical intersections appearing in Hodge theory as well as, more recently, in Teichm\"{u}ller theory.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

203 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    André.G-functions and geometry, volume E13 of Aspects Math

    Y . André.G-functions and geometry, volume E13 of Aspects Math. Wiesbaden etc.: Friedr. Vieweg &| Sohn, 1989

    1989

  2. [2]

    Y . André. Finiteness of couples of singular modular invariants on a plane non-modular algebraic curve.J. Reine Angew. Math., 505:203–208, 1998

    1998

  3. [3]

    Y . André. G-functions, motives, and unlikely intersections – old and new.arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2501.09867, Jan. 2025

    arXiv 2025

  4. [4]

    Andreatta

    F. Andreatta. Coleman-Oort’s conjecture for degenerate irreducible curves. Isr. J. Math., 187:231–285, 2012

    2012

  5. [5]

    Y . André. Shimura varieties, subvarieties, and CM points, 2001. Six lectures at the University of Hsinchu, August-September 2001

    2001

  6. [6]

    S. M. Antonakoudis. Teichmüller spaces and bounded symmetric domains do not mix isometrically. Geom. Funct. Anal., 27(3):453–465, 2017

    2017

  7. [7]

    Apisa and A

    P. Apisa and A. Wright. High rank invariant subvarieties. Ann. Math. (2), 198(2):657–726, 2023

    2023

  8. [8]

    Arbarello, M

    E. Arbarello, M. Cornalba, and P. A. Griffiths. Geometry of algebraic curves. Volume II. With a contribution by Joseph Daniel Harris, volume 268 of Grundlehren Math. Wiss. Berlin: Springer, 2011

    2011

Show all 203 references
  1. [9]

    Arbarello, M

    E. Arbarello, M. Cornalba, P. A. Griffiths, and J. Harris. Geometry of algebraic curves. Volume I, volume 267 of Grundlehren Math. Wiss. Springer, Cham, 1985

    1985

  2. [10]

    Aulicino and C

    D. Aulicino and C. Norton. Shimura-Teichmüller curves in genus 5. J. Mod. Dyn., 16:255–288, 2020

    2020

  3. [11]

    Avila, A

    A. Avila, A. Eskin, and M. Möller. Symplectic and isometricSL(2, R)-invariant subbundles of the Hodge bundle.J. Reine Angew. Math., 732:1–20, 2017

    2017

  4. [12]

    J. Ax. On Schanuel’s conjectures. Ann. Math. (2), 93:252–268, 1971

    1971

  5. [13]

    Bader, D

    U. Bader, D. Fisher, N. Miller, and M. Stover. Arithmeticity, superrigidity, and totally geodesic submanifolds.Ann. of Math. (2), 193(3):837–861, 2021

    2021

  6. [14]

    Bader, D

    U. Bader, D. Fisher, N. Miller, and M. Stover. Arithmeticity, superrigidity and totally geodesic submanifolds of complex hyperbolic manifolds. Invent. Math., 233(1):169–222, 2023

    2023

  7. [15]

    W. L. Baily, Jr. and A. Borel. Compactification of arithmetic quotients of bounded symmetric domains.Ann. of Math. (2), 84:442–528, 1966

    1966

  8. [16]

    Bainbridge, D

    M. Bainbridge, D. Chen, Q. Gendron, S. Grushevsky, and M. Möller. Strata of k-differentials. Algebr. Geom., 6(2):196–233, 2019

    2019

  9. [17]

    Bainbridge and M

    M. Bainbridge and M. Möller. The locus of real multiplication and the Schottky locus. J. Reine Angew. Math., 686:167–186, 2014

    2014

  10. [18]

    Bakker and J

    B. Bakker and J. Tsimerman. Functional Transcendence of Periods and the Geometric André–Grothendieck Period Conjecture. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2208.05182, Aug. 2022

    2022 arXiv

  11. [19]

    G. Baldi. Shimura Varieties, Galois Representations and Motives. Doctoral thesis (Ph.D), UCL (University College London), 2020

    2020

  12. [20]

    G. Baldi. Hodge theory and o-minimality at CIRM. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2502.03071, Feb. 2025

    2025 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Baldi, B

    G. Baldi, B. Klingler, and E. Ullmo. Non-density of the exceptional components of the Noether–Lefschetz locus.International Mathematics Research Notices, 2024(21):13642–13650, November 2024

    2024

  14. [22]

    Baldi, B

    G. Baldi, B. Klingler, and E. Ullmo. On the distribution of the Hodge locus. Invent. Math., 235(2):441–487, 2024

    2024

  15. [23]

    Baldi, N

    G. Baldi, N. Miller, M. Stover, and E. Ullmo. Rich representations and superrigidity. arXiv e-prints. To appear in Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems, page arXiv:2402.03601, Feb. 2024

    2024 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Baldi and E

    G. Baldi and E. Ullmo. Special subvarieties of non-arithmetic ball quotients and Hodge theory. Annals of Mathematics, 197(1):159 – 220, 2023

    2023

  17. [25]

    Baldi and D

    G. Baldi and D. Urbanik. Effective atypical intersections and applications to orbit closures. arXiv e-prints , page arXiv:2406.16628, June 2024

    2024 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Beauville

    A. Beauville. Prym varieties: a survey. Theta functions, Proc. 35th Summer Res. Inst. Bowdoin Coll., Brunswick/ME 1987, Proc. Symp. Pure Math. 49, Pt. 1, 607-620 (1989)., 1989

    1989

  19. [27]

    Benirschke

    F. Benirschke. Bi-algebraic geometry of strata of differentials in genus zero. arXiv e-prints (To appear in Compositio), page arXiv:2310.07523, Oct. 2023

    2023 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Blázquez-Sanz, G

    D. Blázquez-Sanz, G. Casale, J. Freitag, and J. Nagloo. A differential approach to the Ax-Schanuel, I. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2102.03384, Feb. 2021

    2021 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Bombieri, D

    E. Bombieri, D. Masser, and U. Zannier. Intersecting a curve with algebraic subgroups of multiplicative groups.Int. Math. Res. Not., 1999(20):1119–1140, 1999

    1999

  22. [30]

    Bombieri and J

    E. Bombieri and J. Pila. The number of integral points on arcs and ovals. Duke Math. J., 59(2):337–357, 1989

    1989

  23. [31]

    I. I. Bouw and M. Möller. Teichmüller curves, triangle groups, and Lyapunov exponents.Ann. Math. (2), 172(1):139–185, 2010

    2010

  24. [32]

    Breuer.Characters and automorphism groups of compact Riemann surfaces, volume 280 of Lond

    T. Breuer.Characters and automorphism groups of compact Riemann surfaces, volume 280 of Lond. Math. Soc. Lect. Note Ser. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000

    2000

  25. [33]

    D. Brotbek. On the hyperbolicity of general hypersurfaces. Publ. Math., Inst. Hautes Étud. Sci., 126:1–34, 2017. 48

    2017

  26. [34]

    Bruin, E

    N. Bruin, E. V . Flynn, J. Gonzalez, and V . Rotger. On finiteness conjectures for endomorphism algebras of abelian surfaces. Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc., 141(3):383–408, 2006

    2006

  27. [35]

    Calsamiglia, B

    G. Calsamiglia, B. Deroin, and S. Francaviglia. A transfer principle: from periods to isoperiodic foliations. Geom. Funct. Anal., 33(1):57–169, 2023

    2023

  28. [36]

    Cantoral-Farfán, D

    V . Cantoral-Farfán, D. Lombardo, and J. V oight. Monodromy groups of Jacobians with definite quaternionic multiplication. Preprint, arXiv:2303.00804 [math.NT] (2023), 2023

    2023 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Carocca, H

    A. Carocca, H. Lange, and R. E. Rodríguez. Jacobians with complex multiplication.Trans. Am. Math. Soc., 363(12):6159–6175, 2011

    2011

  30. [38]

    Cattani, P

    E. Cattani, P. Deligne, and A. Kaplan. On the locus of Hodge classes. J. Amer. Math. Soc., 8(2):483–506, 1995

    1995

  31. [39]

    G. Ceresa. C is not algebraically equivalent to C − in its Jacobian. Ann. Math. (2), 117:285–291, 1983

    1983

  32. [40]

    C.-L. Chai. Density of members with extra Hodge cycles in a family of Hodge structures. Asian J. Math., 2(3):405–418, 1998

    1998

  33. [41]

    Chai and F

    C.-L. Chai and F. Oort. Abelian varieties isogenous to a Jacobian. Ann. Math. (2), 176(1):589–635, 2012

    2012

  34. [42]

    K. W. Chan. Survey on the Canonical Metrics on the Teichmüller Spaces and the Moduli Spaces of Riemann Surfaces.arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2405.00761, May 2024

    2024 arXiv

  35. [43]

    D. Chen. Teichmüller dynamics in the eyes of an algebraic geometer. InSurveys on recent developments in algebraic geometry. Bootcamp for the 2015 summer research institute on algebraic geometry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, July 6–10, 2015, pages 171–197. Provi...

    2015

  36. [44]

    D. Chen, M. Costantini, and M. Möller. On the Kodaira dimension of moduli spaces of Abelian differentials. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2204.11943, Apr. 2022

    2022 arXiv

  37. [45]

    K. Chen, X. Lu, and K. Zuo. On a question of Ekedahl and Serre. Preprint, arXiv:1703.10377 [math.AG] (2017), 2017

    2017 arXiv

  38. [46]

    R. F. Coleman. Torsion points on curves. Galois representations and arithmetic algebraic geometry, Proc. Symp., Kyoto/Jap. 1985 and Tokyo/Jap. 1986, Adv. Stud. Pure Math. 12, 235-247 (1987)., 1987

    1987

  39. [47]

    R. F. Coleman. Torsion points on Abelian étale coverings ofP 1 − {0, 1, ∞}. Trans. Am. Math. Soc., 311(1):185–208, 1989

    1989

  40. [48]

    Colin de Verdière and A

    Y . Colin de Verdière and A. Marin. Triangulations presque équilatérales des surfaces. (Almost equilateral triangulations of surfaces). J. Differ. Geom., 32(1):199–207, 1990

    1990

  41. [49]

    Colombo and G

    E. Colombo and G. P. Pirola. Some density results for curves with non-simple jacobians. Math. Ann., 288(1):161–178, 1990

    1990

  42. [50]

    Corlette

    K. Corlette. Archimedean superrigidity and hyperbolic geometry. Ann. of Math. (2), 135(1):165–182, 1992

    1992

  43. [51]

    Costa, D

    E. Costa, D. Lombardo, and J. V oight. Identifying central endomorphisms of an abelian variety via Frobenius endomorphisms. Res. Number Theory, 7(3):14, 2021. Id/No 46

    2021

  44. [52]

    Costa, N

    E. Costa, N. Mascot, J. Sijsling, and J. V oight. Rigorous computation of the endomorphism ring of a Jacobian.Math. Comput., 88(317):1303–1339, 2019

    2019

  45. [53]

    Costantini, M

    M. Costantini, M. Möller, and J. Schwab. Chern classes of linear submanifolds with application to spaces of k-differentials and ball quotients. Preprint, arXiv:2303.17929 [math.AG] (2023), 2023

    2023 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Darmon and J.-F

    H. Darmon and J.-F. Mestre. Hyperelliptic curves with real multiplications and a construction of Shih. Can. Math. Bull., 43(3):304–311, 2000

    2000

  47. [55]

    Daw and M

    C. Daw and M. Orr. The large Galois orbits conjecture under multiplicative degeneration. arXiv e-prints , page arXiv:2306.13463, June 2023

    2023 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Daw and J

    C. Daw and J. Ren. Applications of the hyperbolic Ax-Schanuel conjecture. Compos. Math., 154(9):1843–1888, 2018

    2018

  49. [57]

    de Gaay Fortman and S

    O. de Gaay Fortman and S. Schreieder. Abelian varieties with no power isogenous to a Jacobian. arXiv e-prints. To appear in Compositio Mathematica, page arXiv:2401.06577, Jan. 2024

    2024

  50. [58]

    de Jong and R

    J. de Jong and R. Noot. Jacobians with complex multiplication. Arithmetic algebraic geometry, Proc. Conf., Texel/Neth. 1989, Prog. Math. 89, 177-192 (1991)., 1991

    1991

  51. [59]

    de Jong and S.-W

    J. de Jong and S.-W. Zhang. Generic abelian varieties with real multiplication are not Jacobians. InDiophantine geometry. Selected papers of a the workshop, Pisa, Italy, April 12–July 22, 2005, pages 165–172. Pisa: Edizioni della Normale, 2007

    2005

  52. [60]

    H. P. de Saint-Gervais.Uniformisation des surfaces de Riemann. Retour sur un théorème centenaire. Lyon: ENS Éditions, 2010

    2010

  53. [61]

    O. Debarre. The Schottky problem: an update. In Current topics in complex algebraic geometry, pages 57–64. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1995

    1995

  54. [62]

    Debarre and Y

    O. Debarre and Y . Laszlo. Le lieu de Noether-Lefschetz pour les variétés abéliennes. (Noether-Lefschetz locus for abelian varieties). C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris, Sér. I, 311(6):337–340, 1990

    1990

  55. [63]

    P. Deligne. Théorie de Hodge. II. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math., 40:5–57, 1971

    1971

  56. [64]

    P. Deligne. Travaux de Shimura. pages 123–165. Lecture Notes in Math., V ol. 244, 1971

    1971

  57. [65]

    P. Deligne. Variétés de Shimura: interprétation modulaire, et techniques de construction de modèles canoniques. InAutomor- phic forms, representations and L-functions (Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, Ore., 1977), Part 2, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., XXXII...

    1977

  58. [66]

    Deligne and G

    P. Deligne and G. D. Mostow. Monodromy of hypergeometric functions and non-lattice integral monodromy.Publ. Math., Inst. Hautes Étud. Sci., 63:5–89, 1986. 49

    1986

  59. [67]

    Deroin and C

    B. Deroin and C. Matheus. Non-linear bi-algebraic curves and surfaces in moduli spaces of abelian differentials. C. R., Math., Acad. Sci. Paris, 361:1691–1698, 2023

    2023

  60. [68]

    C. J. Earle. Some Jacobian varieties which split. Complex analysis, Proc. Colloq., Joensuu/Finland 1978, Lect. Notes Math. 747, 101-107 (1979)., 1979

    1979

  61. [69]

    S. J. Edixhoven, B. J. J. Moonen, and F. Oort. Open problems in algebraic geometry. Bull. Sci. Math., 125(1):1–22, 2001

    2001

  62. [70]

    Ekedahl and J.-P

    T. Ekedahl and J.-P. Serre. Examples of algebraic curves with totally split Jacobian.C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris, Sér. I, 317(5):509– 513, 1993

    1993

  63. [71]

    J. S. Ellenberg. Endomorphism algebras of Jacobians. Adv. Math., 162(2):243–271, 2001

    2001

  64. [72]

    J. S. Ellenberg, C. Elsholtz, C. Hall, and E. Kowalski. Non-simple abelian varieties in a family: geometric and analytic approaches. J. Lond. Math. Soc., II. Ser., 80(1):135–154, 2009

    2009

  65. [73]

    Eskin, S

    A. Eskin, S. Filip, and A. Wright. The algebraic hull of the Kontsevich-Zorich cocycle. Ann. Math. (2), 188(1):281–313, 2018

    2018

  66. [74]

    Eskin, C

    A. Eskin, C. T. McMullen, R. E. Mukamel, and A. Wright. Billiards, quadrilaterals, and moduli spaces.J. Am. Math. Soc., 33(4):1039–1086, 2020

    2020

  67. [75]

    Eskin, M

    A. Eskin, M. Mirzakhani, and A. Mohammadi. Isolation, equidistribution, and orbit closures for the SL(2, R) action on moduli space. Ann. Math. (2), 182(2):673–721, 2015

    2015

  68. [76]

    Eterovi ´c and T

    S. Eterovi ´c and T. Scanlon. Likely intersections. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2211.10592, Nov. 2022

    2022

  69. [77]

    Faltings

    G. Faltings. Arithmetic varieties and rigidity. In Seminar on number theory, Paris 1982–83 (Paris, 1982/1983), volume 51 of Progr. Math., pages 63–77. Birkhäuser Boston, Boston, MA, 1984

    1982

  70. [78]

    B. Farb. Some problems on mapping class groups and moduli space. In Problems on mapping class groups and related topics, pages 11–55. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society (AMS), 2006

    2006

  71. [79]

    B. Farb. Global rigidity of the period mapping. J. Algebr. Geom., 33(2):199–212, 2024

    2024

  72. [80]

    Farb and D

    B. Farb and D. Margalit. A primer on mapping class groups, volume 49 of Princeton Math. Ser. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2011

    2011

  73. [81]

    Farb and H

    B. Farb and H. Masur. Superrigidity and mapping class groups. Topology, 37(6):1169–1176, 1998

    1998

  74. [82]

    S. Filip. Semisimplicity and rigidity of the Kontsevich-Zorich cocycle. Invent. Math., 205(3):617–670, 2016

    2016

  75. [83]

    S. Filip. Splitting mixed Hodge structures over affine invariant manifolds. Ann. Math. (2), 183(2):681–713, 2016

    2016

  76. [84]

    S. Filip. Translation surfaces: dynamics and Hodge theory. EMS Surv. Math. Sci., 11(1):63–151, 2024

    2024

  77. [85]

    Forni and C

    G. Forni and C. Matheus. Introduction to Teichmüller theory and its applications to dynamics of interval exchange transforma- tions, flows on surfaces and billiards. J. Mod. Dyn., 8(3-4):271–436, 2014

    2014

  78. [86]

    Frediani and G

    P. Frediani and G. P. Pirola. On the geometry of the second fundamental form of the Torelli map. Proc. Am. Math. Soc., 149(3):1011–1024, 2021

    2021

  79. [87]

    Gallese, H

    A. Gallese, H. Goodson, and D. Lombardo. Monodromy groups and exceptional Hodge classes. arXiv e-prints , page arXiv:2405.20394, May 2024

    2024

  80. [88]

    Z. Gao. Towards the André-Oort conjecture for mixed Shimura varieties: the Ax-Lindemann theorem and lower bounds for Galois orbits of special points. J. Reine Angew. Math., 732:85–146, 2017

    2017

  81. [89]

    Z. Gao. Mixed Ax-Schanuel for the universal abelian varieties and some applications. Compos. Math., 156(11):2263–2297, 2020

    2020

  82. [90]

    Gao and S.-W

    Z. Gao and S.-W. Zhang. Heights and periods of algebraic cycles in families.arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2407.01304, July 2024

    2024

  83. [91]

    Q. Gendron. The strata do not contain complete varieties. C. R., Math., Acad. Sci. Paris, 358(2):197–200, 2020

    2020

  84. [92]

    Ghazouani and L

    S. Ghazouani and L. Pirio. Moduli spaces of flat tori with prescribed holonomy. Geom. Funct. Anal., 27(6):1289–1366, 2017

    2017

  85. [93]

    Ghazouani and L

    S. Ghazouani and L. Pirio. Moduli spaces of flat tori and elliptic hypergeometric functions, volume 164 of Mém. Soc. Math. Fr., Nouv. Sér.Société Mathématique de France (SMF), Paris, 2020

    2020

  86. [94]

    H. Goodson. An Exploration of Degeneracy in Abelian Varieties of Fermat Type. Preprint, arXiv:2211.03909 [math.NT] (2022), 2022

    2022 arXiv

  87. [95]

    E. Goujard. Sous-variétés totalement géodésiques des espaces de modules de riemann. Séminaire Bourbaki, 73e année(1178), April 2021. d’après Eskin, McMullen, Mukamel, Wright

    2021

  88. [96]

    Green, P

    M. Green, P. Griffiths, and M. Kerr. Mumford-Tate groups and domains, volume 183 of Annals of Mathematics Studies . Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2012. Their geometry and arithmetic

    2012

  89. [97]

    Griffiths, C

    P. Griffiths, C. Robles, and D. Toledo. Quotients of non-classical flag domains are not algebraic.Algebr. Geom., 1(1):1–13, 2014

    2014

  90. [98]

    Gromov and R

    M. Gromov and R. Schoen. Harmonic maps into singular spaces and p-adic superrigidity for lattices in groups of rank one. Publ. Math., Inst. Hautes Étud. Sci., 76:165–246, 1992

    1992

  91. [99]

    Grushevsky, G

    S. Grushevsky, G. Mondello, R. Salvati Manni, and J. Tsimerman. Compact Subvarieties of the Moduli Space of Complex Abelian Varieties. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2404.06009, Apr. 2024

    2024

  92. [100]

    R. Hain. Locally symmetric families of curves and Jacobians. In Moduli of curves and abelian varieties, Aspects Math., E33, pages 91–108. Friedr. Vieweg, Braunschweig, 1999. 50

    1999

  93. [101]

    R. Hain. The Rank of the Normal Functions of the Ceresa and Gross–Schoen Cycles. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2408.07809, Aug. 2024

    2024 arXiv

  94. [102]

    F. Hess. An algorithm for computing isomorphisms of algebraic function fields. InAlgorithmic number theory. 6th international symposium, ANTS-VI, Burlington, VT, USA, June 13–18, 2004. Proceedings., pages 263–271. Berlin: Springer, 2004

    2004

  95. [103]

    Irokawa and R

    S. Irokawa and R. Sasaki. On a family of quotients of Fermat curves. Tsukuba J. Math., 19(1):121–139, 1995

    1995

  96. [104]

    E. Izadi. Density and completeness of subvarieties of moduli spaces of curves or abelian varieties.Math. Ann., 310(2):221–233, 1998

    1998

  97. [105]

    Kappes and M

    A. Kappes and M. Möller. Lyapunov spectrum of ball quotients with applications to commensurability questions. Duke Math. J., 165(1):1–66, 2016

    2016

  98. [106]

    Keel and L

    S. Keel and L. Sadun. Oort’s conjecture for Ag ⊗ C. J. Am. Math. Soc., 16(4):887–900, 2003

    2003

  99. [107]

    Kerr and S

    M. Kerr and S. Tayou. On the torsion locus of the Ceresa normal function. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2406.19366, June 2024

    2024 arXiv

  100. [108]

    Khelifa and D

    N. Khelifa and D. Urbanik. Existence and density of typical Hodge loci. arXiv e-prints. To appear in Mathematische Annalen, page arXiv:2303.16179, Mar. 2023

    2023 arXiv

  101. [109]

    Klingler and L

    B. Klingler and L. A. Lerer. Abelian differentials and their periods: the bi-algebraic point of view. arXiv e-prints. To appear in J. Eur. Math. Soc.., page arXiv:2202.06031, Feb. 2022

    2022 arXiv

  102. [110]

    Klingler, E

    B. Klingler, E. Ullmo, and A. Yafaev. Bi-algebraic geometry and the André-Oort conjecture. InAlgebraic geometry: Salt Lake City 2015, volume 97 of Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., pages 319–359. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2018

    2015

  103. [111]

    Kobayashi

    S. Kobayashi. Hyperbolic complex spaces, volume 318 of Grundlehren Math. Wiss. Berlin: Springer, 1998

    1998

  104. [112]

    Kontsevich and A

    M. Kontsevich and A. Zorich. Lyapunov exponents and Hodge theory. arXiv e-prints, pages hep–th/9701164, Jan. 1997

    1997

  105. [113]

    Kontsevich and A

    M. Kontsevich and A. Zorich. Connected components of the moduli spaces of Abelian differentials with prescribed singularities. Invent. Math., 153(3):631–678, 2003

    2003

  106. [114]

    Koziarz and N

    V . Koziarz and N. Mok. Nonexistence of holomorphic submersions between complex unit balls equivariant with respect to a lattice and their generalizations. Am. J. Math., 132(5):1347–1363, 2010

    2010

  107. [115]

    Kukulies

    S. Kukulies. On Shimura curves in the Schottky locus. J. Algebr. Geom., 19(2):371–397, 2010

    2010

  108. [116]

    Kumar and R

    A. Kumar and R. E. Mukamel. Algebraic models and arithmetic geometry of Teichmüller curves in genus two. Int. Math. Res. Not., 2017(22):6894–6942, 2017

    2017

  109. [117]

    Lange and R

    H. Lange and R. E. Rodríguez. Decomposition of Jacobians by Prym varieties, volume 2310 of Lect. Notes Math. Cham: Springer, 2022

    2022

  110. [118]

    M. Larsen. How often is 84(g − 1) achieved? Isr. J. Math., 126:1–16, 2001

    2001

  111. [119]

    E. Larson. Degenerations of Curves in Projective Space and the Maximal Rank Conjecture. arXiv e-prints , page arXiv:1809.05980, Sept. 2018

    2018 arXiv

  112. [120]

    K. Liu. Geometric height inequalities. Math. Res. Lett., 3(5):693–702, 1996

    1996

  113. [121]

    P. Lochak. On arithmetic curves in the moduli spaces of curves. J. Inst. Math. Jussieu, 4(3):443–508, 2005

    2005

  114. [122]

    Lombardo

    D. Lombardo. Computing the geometric endomorphism ring of a genus-2 Jacobian. Math. Comput., 88(316):889–929, 2019

    2019

  115. [123]

    X. Lu, S. Tan, and K. Zuo. Non-existence of Shimura curves of Mumford type generically in the non-hyperelliptic locus. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2403.06217, Mar. 2024

    2024 arXiv

  116. [124]

    Lu and K

    X. Lu and K. Zuo. The Oort conjecture on Shimura curves in the Torelli locus of hyperelliptic curves.J. Math. Pures Appl. (9), 108(4):532–552, 2017

    2017

  117. [125]

    J. Marché. Introduction to quantum representations of mapping class groups. In Topology and geometry. A collection of essays dedicated to Vladimir G. Turaev, pages 109–130. Berlin: European Mathematical Society, 2021

    2021

  118. [126]

    G. A. Margulis. Discrete subgroups of semisimple Lie groups, volume 17 ofErgebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete (3) [Results in Mathematics and Related Areas (3)]. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1991

    1991

  119. [127]

    Martinez-Nunez

    G. Martinez-Nunez. Decomposition of jacobians of generalized Fermat curves. Preprint, arXiv:2303.18056 [math.AG] (2023), 2023

    2023

  120. [128]

    Masser and U

    D. Masser and U. Zannier. Abelian varieties isogenous to no Jacobian. Ann. Math. (2), 191(2):635–674, 2020

    2020

  121. [129]

    Matsusaka

    T. Matsusaka. On a generating curve of an Abelian variety. Nat. Sci. Rep. Ochanomizu Univ., 3:1–4, 1952

    1952

  122. [130]

    C. T. McMullen. From dynamics on surfaces to rational points on curves. Bull. Am. Math. Soc., New Ser., 37(2):119–140, 2000

    2000

  123. [131]

    C. T. McMullen. Billiards and Teichmüller curves on Hilbert modular surfaces. J. Am. Math. Soc., 16(4):857–885, 2003

    2003

  124. [132]

    C. T. McMullen. Braid groups and Hodge theory. Math. Ann., 355(3):893–946, 2013

    2013

  125. [133]

    C. T. McMullen. Entropy on Riemann surfaces and the Jacobians of finite covers. Comment. Math. Helv., 88(4):953–964, 2013

    2013

  126. [134]

    C. T. McMullen. Moduli spaces of isoperiodic forms on Riemann surfaces. Duke Math. J., 163(12):2271–2323, 2014

    2014

  127. [135]

    C. T. McMullen. Billiards and Teichmüller curves. Bull. Am. Math. Soc., New Ser., 60(2):195–250, 2023

    2023

  128. [136]

    C. T. McMullen. Triangle groups and Hilbert modular varieties, 2023. Preprint, available on the author’s website

    2023

  129. [137]

    C. T. McMullen, R. E. Mukamel, and A. Wright. Cubic curves and totally geodesic subvarieties of moduli space. Ann. Math. (2), 185(3):957–990, 2017

    2017

  130. [138]

    J. S. Milne. Jacobian varieties. Arithmetic geometry, Pap. Conf., Storrs/Conn. 1984, 167-212 (1986)., 1986. 51

    1986

  131. [139]

    J. S. Milne. Automorphic vector bundles on connected Shimura varieties. Invent. Math., 92(1):91–128, 1988

    1988

  132. [140]

    J. S. Milne. Introduction to Shimura varieties. In Harmonic analysis, the trace formula, and Shimura varieties, volume 4 of Clay Math. Proc., pages 265–378. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2005. The revised version (September 16, 2017) is avaible at https://www.jmilne.org/ma...

    2005

  133. [141]

    Mochizuki

    S. Mochizuki. Correspondences on hyperbolic curves. J. Pure Appl. Algebra, 131(3):227–244, 1998

    1998

  134. [142]

    N. Mok. Holomorphic retractions of bounded symmetric domains onto totally geodesic complex submanifolds. Chin. Ann. Math., Ser. B, 43(6):1125–1142, 2022

    2022

  135. [143]

    N. Mok, J. Pila, and J. Tsimerman. Ax-Schanuel for Shimura varieties. Ann. of Math. (2), 189(3):945–978, 2019

    2019

  136. [144]

    M. Möller. Variations of Hodge structures of a Teichmüller curve. J. Am. Math. Soc., 19(2):327–344, 2006

    2006

  137. [145]

    M. Möller. Linear manifolds in the moduli space of one-forms. Duke Math. J., 144(3):447–487, 2008

    2008

  138. [146]

    M. Möller. Shimura and Teichmüller curves. J. Mod. Dyn., 5(1):1–32, 2011

    2011

  139. [147]

    Möller and S

    M. Möller and S. Mullane. Teichmüller curves in hyperelliptic components of meromorphic strata. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2305.03309, May 2023

    2023 arXiv

  140. [148]

    B. Moonen. Linearity properties of Shimura varieties. I. J. Algebr. Geom., 7(3):539–567, 1998

    1998

  141. [149]

    B. Moonen. Special subvarieties arising from families of cyclic covers of the projective line. Doc. Math., 15:793–819, 2010

    2010

  142. [150]

    B. Moonen. The Coleman-Oort conjecture: reduction to three key cases. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc., 54(6):2418–2426, 2022

    2022

  143. [151]

    B. Moonen. A classification of Shimura curves in Ag. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2405.20673, May 2024

    2024 arXiv

  144. [152]

    Moonen and F

    B. Moonen and F. Oort. The Torelli locus and special subvarieties. In Handbook of moduli. Volume II , pages 549–594. Somerville, MA: International Press; Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2013

    2013

  145. [153]

    R. E. Mukamel. Orbifold points on Teichmüller curves and Jacobians with complex multiplication. Geom. Topol., 18(2):779– 829, 2014

    2014

  146. [154]

    Müller and R

    N. Müller and R. Pink. Hyperelliptic curves with many automorphisms. Int. J. Number Theory, 18(4):913–930, 2022

    2022

  147. [155]

    D. Mumford. A note of Shimura’s paper: Discontinuous groups and Abelian varieties. Math. Ann., 181:345–351, 1969

    1969

  148. [156]

    D. Mumford. Curves and their Jacobians. Ann. Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. 104 p. $ 5.00 (1975)., 1975

    1975

  149. [157]

    M. V . Nori. A nonarithmetic monodromy group.C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math., 302(2):71–72, 1986

    1986

  150. [158]

    Obus and T

    A. Obus and T. Shaska. Superelliptic curves with many automorphisms and CM Jacobians.Math. Comput., 90(332):2951–2975, 2021

    2021

  151. [159]

    F. Oort. Canonical liftings and dense sets of CM-points. InArithmetic geometry. Proceedings of a symposium, Cortona, Arezzo, Italy, October 16–21, 1994, pages 228–234. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997

    1994

  152. [160]

    Orr and A

    M. Orr and A. N. Skorobogatov. Finiteness theorems for K3 surfaces and abelian varieties of CM type. Compos. Math., 154(8):1571–1592, 2018

    2018

  153. [161]

    G. Papas. Unlikely intersections in the Torelli locus and the G-functions method. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2201.11240, Jan. 2022

    2022 arXiv

  154. [162]

    J. Paulhus. Elliptic factors in Jacobians of hyperelliptic curves with certain automorphism groups. In ANTS X. Proceedings of the tenth algorithmic number theory symposium, San Diego, CA, USA, July 9–13, 2012, pages 487–505. Berkeley, CA: Mathematical Sciences Publishers (MSP), 2013

    2012

  155. [163]

    Paulhus and A

    J. Paulhus and A. M. Rojas. Completely decomposable Jacobian varieties in new genera. Exp. Math., 26(4):430–445, 2017

    2017

  156. [164]

    C. Peters. Rigidity of spreadings and fields of definition. EMS Surv. Math. Sci., 4(1):77–100, 2017

    2017

  157. [165]

    J. Pila. Point-counting and the Zilber-Pink conjecture, volume 228 of Camb. Tracts Math. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022

    2022

  158. [166]

    J. Pila, A. N. Shankar, J. Tsimerman, H. Esnault, and M. Groechenig. Canonical Heights on Shimura Varieties and the André-Oort Conjecture. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2109.08788, Sept. 2021

    2021 arXiv

  159. [167]

    Pila and J

    J. Pila and J. Tsimerman. Ax-Schanuel and exceptional integrability. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2202.04023, Feb. 2022

    2022 arXiv

  160. [168]

    Pila and A

    J. Pila and A. J. Wilkie. The rational points of a definable set. Duke Math. J., 133(3):591–616, 2006

    2006

  161. [169]

    Pila and U

    J. Pila and U. Zannier. Rational points in periodic analytic sets and the Manin-Mumford conjecture. Atti Accad. Naz. Lincei, Cl. Sci. Fis. Mat. Nat., IX. Ser., Rend. Lincei, Mat. Appl., 19(2):149–162, 2008

    2008

  162. [170]

    R. Pink. A combination of the conjectures of Mordell-Lang and André-Oort. In Geometric methods in algebra and number theory, pages 251–282. Basel: Birkhäuser, 2005

    2005

  163. [171]

    Podelski

    C. Podelski. The Tannakian Schottky Conjecture in Genus Five. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2501.07512, Jan. 2025

    2025 arXiv

  164. [172]

    Pohlmann

    H. Pohlmann. Algebraic cycles on abelian varieties of complex multiplication type. Ann. Math. (2), 88:161–180, 1968

    1968

  165. [173]

    M. Raynaud. Sous-variétés d’une variété abélienne et points de torsion. Arithmetic and geometry, Pap. dedic. I. R. Shafarevich, V ol. I: Arithmetic, Prog. Math. 35, 327-352 (1983)., 1983

    1983

  166. [174]

    J. C. Rohde. Cyclic coverings, Calabi-Yau manifolds and complex multiplication, volume 1975 of Lect. Notes Math. Berlin: Springer, 2009

    1975

  167. [175]

    H. L. Royden. Automorphisms and isometries of Teichmüller space. Proc. Romanian-Finnish Semin. Teichmüller Spaces quasiconform. Mappings, Bra¸ sov 1969, 273-286 (1971)., 1971

    1971

  168. [176]

    H. L. Royden. Invariant metrics on Teichmüller space. Contribut. to Analysis, Collect. of Papers dedicated to Lipman Bers, 393-399 (1974)., 1974. 52

    1974

  169. [177]

    Schlage-Puchta and G

    J.-C. Schlage-Puchta and G. Weitze-Schmithüsen. Finite translation surfaces with maximal number of translations. Isr. J. Math., 217:1–15, 2017

    2017

  170. [178]

    A. N. Shankar and J. Tsimerman. Abelian varieties not isogenous to Jacobians over global fields. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2105.02998, May 2021

    2021 arXiv

  171. [179]

    Tautz, J

    W. Tautz, J. Top, and A. Verberkmoes. Explicit hyperelliptic curves with real multiplication and permutation polynomials. Can. J. Math., 43(5):1055–1064, 1991

    1991

  172. [180]

    W. P. Thurston. Shapes of polyhedra and triangulations of the sphere. In The Epstein Birthday Schrift dedicated to David Epstein on the occasion of his 60th birthday, pages 511–549. Warwick: University of Warwick, Institute of Mathematics, 1998

    1998

  173. [181]

    D. Toledo. Non-existence of certain closed complex geodesics in the moduli space of curves. Pac. J. Math., 129(1):187–192, 1987

    1987

  174. [182]

    R. Torelli. Sulle varietà di Jacobi. Rom. Acc. L. Rend. (5), 22(2):98–103, 437–441, 1913

    1913

  175. [183]

    Tsimerman

    J. Tsimerman. The existence of an abelian variety over Q isogenous to no Jacobian. Ann. Math. (2), 176(1):637–650, 2012

    2012

  176. [184]

    Tsimerman

    J. Tsimerman. The André-Oort conjecture for Ag. Ann. of Math. (2), 187(2):379–390, 2018

    2018

  177. [185]

    Tsimerman

    J. Tsimerman. Abelian varieties are not quotients of low-dimension Jacobians. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2302.05860, Feb. 2023

    2023 arXiv

  178. [186]

    E. Ullmo. Applications du théorème d’Ax-Lindemann hyperbolique. Compos. Math., 150(2):175–190, 2014

    2014

  179. [187]

    Ullmo and A

    E. Ullmo and A. Yafaev. A characterization of special subvarieties. Mathematika, 57(2):263–273, 2011

    2011

  180. [188]

    D. Urbanik. Geometric G-functions and Atypicality. arXiv e-prints. To appear in DMJ, page arXiv:2301.01857, Jan. 2023

    2023 arXiv

  181. [189]

    van der Geer and F

    G. van der Geer and F. Oort. Moduli of abelian varieties: a short introduction and survey. InModuli of curves and abelian varieties. The Dutch intercity seminar on moduli, pages 1–21. Braunschweig: Vieweg, 1999

    1999

  182. [190]

    W. A. Veech. Teichmüller curves in moduli space, Eisenstein series and an application to triangular billiards.Invent. Math., 97(3):553–583, 1989

    1989

  183. [191]

    W. A. Veech. Flat surfaces. Am. J. Math., 115(3):589–689, 1993

    1993

  184. [192]

    E. Viehweg. Arakelov inequalities. In Geometry, analysis, and algebraic geometry. Forty years of the Journal of Differential Geometry. Based on the 7th conference on geometry and topology, Cambridge, MA, USA, May 2008. In memory of Prof. C.-C. Hsiung, pages 245–275. Somerville...

    2008

  185. [193]

    C. V oisin. Hodge loci. InHandbook of moduli. Volume III, pages 507–546. Somerville, MA: International Press; Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2013

    2013

  186. [194]

    J. Wolfart. Werte hypergeometrischer Funktionen. Invent. Math., 92(1):187–216, 1988

    1988

  187. [195]

    A. Wright. Schwarz triangle mappings and Teichmüller curves: The Veech-Ward-Bouw-Möller curves.Geom. Funct. Anal., 23(2):776–809, 2013

    2013

  188. [196]

    A. Wright. The field of definition of affine invariant submanifolds of the moduli space of abelian differentials. Geom. Topol., 18(3):1323–1341, 2014

    2014

  189. [197]

    A. Wright. Totally geodesic submanifolds of Teichmüller space. J. Differ. Geom., 115(3):565–575, 2020

    2020

  190. [198]

    K. Yamanoi. Pseudo Kobayashi hyperbolicity of subvarieties of general type on abelian varieties. J. Math. Soc. Japan , 71(1):259–298, 2019

    2019

  191. [199]

    S.-K. Yeung. Open Torelli locus and complex ball quotients. Math. Res. Lett., 28(5):1595–1612, 2021

    2021

  192. [200]

    U. Zannier. Some problems of unlikely intersections in arithmetic and geometry. With appendixes by David Masser, volume 181 of Ann. Math. Stud. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2012

    2012

  193. [201]

    U. Zannier. Some specialization theorems for families of abelian varieties. Münster J. Math., 13(2):597–619, 2020

    2020

  194. [202]

    B. Zilber. Exponential sums equations and the Schanuel conjecture. J. Lond. Math. Soc., II. Ser., 65(1):27–44, 2002

    2002

  195. [203]

    D. Zywina. Families of abelian varieties and large Galois images. Int. Math. Res. Not., 2023(20):17494–17551, 2023. CNRS, IMJ-PRG, S ORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ , 4 PLACE JUSSIEU , 75005 P ARIS , F RANCE E-mail address, G. Baldi: baldi@imj-prg.fr 53

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.