REVIEW 2 cited by
Evaluating Partisan Gerrymandering in Wisconsin
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
We examine the extent of gerrymandering for the 2010 General Assembly district map of Wisconsin. We find that there is substantial variability in the election outcome depending on what maps are used. We also found robust evidence that the district maps are highly gerrymandered and that this gerrymandering likely altered the partisan make up of the Wisconsin General Assembly in some elections. Compared to the distribution of possible redistricting plans for the General Assembly, Wisconsin's chosen plan is an outlier in that it yields results that are highly skewed to the Republicans when the statewide proportion of Democratic votes comprises more than 50-52% of the overall vote (with the precise threshold depending on the election considered). Wisconsin's plan acts to preserve the Republican majority by providing extra Republican seats even when the Democratic vote increases into the range when the balance of power would shift for the vast majority of redistricting plans.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Complexity and Geometry of Sampling Connected Graph Partitions
Uniform and balanced sampling of connected planar graph partitions is hard unless RP=NP, the flip walk mixes exponentially slowly on explicit triangulation families, and tractable cases include series-parallel and bou...
-
Free Elections in the Free State: Ensemble Analysis of Redistricting in New Hampshire
An ensemble analysis of redistricting in New Hampshire finds the enacted State Senate and Executive Council maps are Republican-leaning outliers relative to typical nonpartisan plans.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.