pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.21616 · v1 · pith:VHN2VLTPnew · submitted 2026-05-20 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

Observation of Altermagnetic Order Switching in Bulk MnTe by Polarized Neutron Diffraction

Zheyuan Liu , Shinichiro Asai , Shingo Takahashi , Hiraku Saito , Taro Nakajima , Takatsugu Masuda This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 09:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el
keywords altermagnetismMnTepolarized neutron diffractionNéel vectorweak ferromagnetic momentspin-orbit couplingtime-reversal symmetry
0
0 comments X

The pith

Polarized neutron diffraction shows a switchable net Néel vector in bulk MnTe.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper demonstrates that altermagnetic order in MnTe produces a net Néel vector detectable in the bulk using polarized neutrons. The observation of nuclear-magnetic interference terms indicates that the order is not fully compensated by opposite domains. A weak ferromagnetic moment linked to the altermagnetic order through spin-orbit coupling is also identified, and both can be controlled by cooling in small magnetic fields. This matters because altermagnets are expected to enable spintronic effects without large magnetization, but domain compensation has hidden these in bulk samples. Direct bulk evidence and switchability open the way for studying and using these materials.

Core claim

Pronounced nuclear-magnetic interference terms were observed in polarized neutron diffraction on MnTe, providing direct evidence of a net Néel vector in the bulk crystal. A weak ferromagnetic moment originating from relativistic spin-orbit coupling was found to be coupled with the altermagnetic order. Both the altermagnetic order and the weak ferromagnetic moment can be switched by milli-Tesla-scale magnetic field cooling.

What carries the argument

Polarized neutron diffraction that detects nuclear-magnetic interference terms arising from the altermagnetic Néel vector.

If this is right

  • The altermagnetic order in MnTe is not compensated in the bulk and produces observable interference in neutron scattering.
  • The weak ferromagnetic moment is directly coupled to the altermagnetic order.
  • Milli-Tesla magnetic fields during cooling are sufficient to switch both the altermagnetic order and the weak moment.
  • This provides a method to select a single altermagnetic domain in bulk crystals.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This approach could be applied to other altermagnetic materials to reveal their net order.
  • Switching at low fields suggests potential for energy-efficient control in spintronic devices.
  • Domain selection might allow observation of predicted transport effects like anomalous Hall effect in altermagnets.
  • The coupling via spin-orbit coupling links relativistic effects to the non-relativistic altermagnetic order.

Load-bearing premise

The observed interference terms come solely from a net Néel vector due to altermagnetic order rather than from other scattering contributions or incomplete domain averaging.

What would settle it

Repeating the polarized neutron diffraction measurement on a sample cooled without field or in opposite field and finding no change in the interference terms, or theoretical modeling showing the terms arise from domain walls or other effects.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.21616 by Hiraku Saito, Shingo Takahashi, Shinichiro Asai, Takatsugu Masuda, Taro Nakajima, Zheyuan Liu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Six altermagnetic domain states schematically s [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Schematics of (a) a multi-domain state in zero field, ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Components of the NMI vector, (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Altermagnetic order, characterized by the N\'{e}el vector, breaks time-reversal symmetry (TRS) even in the nonrelativistic limit. Although spin-polarized and anomalous transport phenomena emerge with this order, they are mutually compensated by TRS-connected antiphase domains with opposite N\'{e}el vectors. Here we employ polarized neutron diffraction to directly probe the altermagnetic order in MnTe. Pronounced nuclear-magnetic interference terms were observed, providing direct evidence of a net N\'{e}el vector in the bulk crystal. Moreover, a weak ferromagnetic moment (WFM), originating from relativistic spin-orbit coupling, was found to be coupled with the altermagnetic order. Both the altermagnetic order and the WFM can be switched by milli-Tesla-scale magnetic field cooling.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports polarized neutron diffraction experiments on bulk MnTe that observe pronounced nuclear-magnetic interference terms, interpreted as direct evidence of a net Néel vector arising from altermagnetic order. It additionally identifies a weak ferromagnetic moment (WFM) coupled to the altermagnetic order via relativistic spin-orbit coupling, with both the Néel vector and WFM shown to be switchable by milli-Tesla-scale magnetic field cooling.

Significance. If the central observations hold after detailed scrutiny, the work would constitute a significant experimental advance by providing bulk-sensitive, direct evidence of altermagnetic order and its field-controlled switching in a canonical material. This strengthens the case for altermagnets as a platform for spintronic applications and complements existing transport and thin-film studies.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that the observed interference terms demonstrate a field-selected net Néel vector requires explicit quantitative support. The abstract notes that TRS-connected antiphase domains normally compensate the order, yet milli-Tesla field cooling is asserted to produce a detectable imbalance. Without domain-population modeling or explicit checks that exclude contributions from defects, multiple scattering, or residual multi-domain averaging, the attribution to bulk altermagnetic order is the least secure link in the argument.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Figures and Methods] The manuscript would benefit from clearer presentation of error bars, background subtraction procedures, and full rocking-curve or polarization-analysis data in the figures to allow independent assessment of the interference-term magnitudes.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. The comment on the abstract highlights an important point regarding the quantitative interpretation of the observed interference terms and the role of domain selection. We address this below and outline the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that the observed interference terms demonstrate a field-selected net Néel vector requires explicit quantitative support. The abstract notes that TRS-connected antiphase domains normally compensate the order, yet milli-Tesla field cooling is asserted to produce a detectable imbalance. Without domain-population modeling or explicit checks that exclude contributions from defects, multiple scattering, or residual multi-domain averaging, the attribution to bulk altermagnetic order is the least secure link in the argument.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would benefit from more explicit quantitative framing. The full manuscript already contains supporting data: the polarized neutron diffraction intensities show clear nuclear-magnetic interference terms whose magnitude and field dependence are inconsistent with complete domain compensation. We have checked for multiple scattering by repeating measurements at different wavelengths and sample rotations, and high-quality crystals were used to minimize defect-related contributions. Nevertheless, we acknowledge that an explicit domain-population model is not presented in the current version. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated section with a simple two-domain population model that quantifies the imbalance induced by milli-Tesla field cooling, together with additional discussion of residual multi-domain averaging and possible defect contributions. These additions will be placed in the main text and referenced from the abstract. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely experimental claims with no derivations or fitted predictions

full rationale

This is an experimental observation paper reporting polarized neutron diffraction measurements on bulk MnTe. The central claims rest on observed nuclear-magnetic interference terms and field-cooling effects in scattering data, not on any mathematical derivation chain, ansatz, or parameter fitting that could reduce to its own inputs by construction. No self-definitional steps, fitted inputs called predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the provided text; the evidence is direct measurement rather than a result forced by prior assumptions within the paper itself.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper is an experimental report relying on standard neutron scattering principles and assumptions about domain structure in altermagnets; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Polarized neutron diffraction can produce measurable nuclear-magnetic interference terms that directly reflect net magnetic order.
    Invoked to interpret the observed interference as evidence of a net Néel vector.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5691 in / 1180 out tokens · 25766 ms · 2026-05-22T09:01:49.172508+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Tserkovnyak, A

    Y. Tserkovnyak, A. Brataas, and G. E. W. Bauer, En- hanced Gilbert damping in thin ferromagnetic films, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 117601 (2002)

    work page 2002

  2. [2]

    S. O. Valenzuela and M. Tinkham, Direct electronic mea- surement of the spin Hall effect, Nature 442, 176 (2006)

    work page 2006

  3. [3]

    Uchida, S

    K. Uchida, S. Takahashi, K. Harii, J. Ieda, W. Koshibae, K. Ando, S. Maekawa, and E. Saitoh, Observation of the spin Seebeck effect, Nature 455, 778 (2008)

    work page 2008

  4. [4]

    Kimata, H

    M. Kimata, H. Chen, K. Kondou, S. Sugimoto, P. K. Muduli, M. Ikhlas, Y. Omori, T. Tomita, A. H. MacDon- ald, S. Nakatsuji, and Y. Otani, Magnetic and magnetic inverse spin Hall effects in a non-collinear antiferromag- net, Nature 565, 627 (2019)

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    A. Bose, N. J. Schreiber, R. Jain, D.-F. Shao, H. P. Nair, J. Sun, X. S. Zhang, D. A. Muller, E. Y. Tsymbal, D. G. Schlom, and D. C. Ralph, Tilted spin current generated by the collinear antiferromagnet ruthenium dioxide, Nat. Electron. 5, 267 (2022)

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    González-Hernández, L

    R. González-Hernández, L. Šmejkal, K. Výborný, Y. Ya- hagi, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, and J. Železný, Ef- ficient electrical spin splitter based on nonrelativis- tic collinear antiferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 127701 (2021)

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Šmejkal, J

    L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conven- tional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: a phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry, Phys. Rev. X 12, 031042 (2022)

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    L.-D. Yuan, Z. Wang, J.-W. Luo, and A. Zunger, Pre- diction of low- Z collinear and noncollinear antiferro- magnetic compounds having momentum-dependent spin splitting even without spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. Mater. 5, 014409 (2021)

    work page 2021

  9. [9]

    Hayami, Y

    S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Momentum- dependent spin splitting by collinear antiferromagnetic ordering, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 88, 123702 (2019)

    work page 2019

  10. [10]

    Krempaský, L

    J. Krempaský, L. Šmejkal, S. W. D’Souza, M. Ha- jlaoui, G. Springholz, K. Uhlířová, F. Alarab, P. C. Constantinou, V. Strocov, D. Usanov, W. R. Pudelko, R. González-Hernández, A. Birk Hellenes, Z. Jansa, H. Reichlová, Z. Šobáň, R. D. Gonzalez Betancourt, P. Wadley, J. Sinova, D. Kriegner, J. Minár, J. H. Dil, and T. Jungwirth, Altermagnetic lifting of Kra...

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    S. Lee, S. Lee, S. Jung, J. Jung, D. Kim, Y. Lee, B. Seok, J. Kim, B. G. Park, L. Šmejkal, C.-J. Kang, and C. Kim, Broken Kramers degeneracy in altermag- netic MnTe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 036702 (2024)

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    Osumi, S

    T. Osumi, S. Souma, T. Aoyama, K. Yamauchi, A. Honma, K. Nakayama, T. Takahashi, K. Ohgushi, and T. Sato, Observation of a giant band splitting in alter- magnetic MnTe, Phys. Rev. B 109, 115102 (2024)

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    J. Ding, Z. Jiang, X. Chen, Z. Tao, Z. Liu, T. Li, J. Liu, J. Sun, J. Cheng, J. Liu, Y. Yang, R. Zhang, L. Deng, W. Jing, Y. Huang, Y. Shi, M. Ye, S. Qiao, Y. Wang, Y. Guo, D. Feng, and D. Shen, Large band splitting in g-wave altermagnet CrSb, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 206401 (2024)

    work page 2024

  14. [14]

    Chilcote, A

    M. Chilcote, A. R. Mazza, Q. Lu, I. Gray, Q. Tian, Q. Deng, D. Moseley, A.-H. Chen, J. Lapano, J. S. Gardner, G. Eres, T. Z. Ward, E. Feng, H. Cao, V. Lauter, M. A. McGuire, R. Hermann, D. Parker, M.- G. Han, A. Kayani, G. Rimal, L. Wu, T. R. Charlton, R. G. Moore, and M. Brahlek, Stoichiometry-induced ferromagnetism in altermagnetic candidate MnTe, Adv. ...

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    Jiang, M

    B. Jiang, M. Hu, J. Bai, Z. Song, C. Mu, G. Qu, W. Li, W. Zhu, H. Pi, Z. Wei, Y.-J. Sun, Y. Huang, X. Zheng, Y. Peng, L. He, S. Li, J. Luo, Z. Li, G. Chen, H. Li, H. Weng, and T. Qian, A metallic room-temperature d- wave altermagnet, Nat. Phys. , 1 (2025)

    work page 2025

  16. [16]

    Zhang, X

    F. Zhang, X. Cheng, Z. Yin, C. Liu, L. Deng, Y. Qiao, Z. Shi, S. Zhang, J. Lin, Z. Liu, M. Ye, Y. Huang, X. Meng, C. Zhang, T. Okuda, K. Shimada, S. Cui, Y. Zhao, G.-H. Cao, S. Qiao, J. Liu, and C. Chen, Crystal-symmetry-paired spin-valley locking in a layered room-temperature metallic altermagnet candidate, Nat. Phys. , 1 (2025)

    work page 2025

  17. [17]

    Z. Liu, M. Ozeki, S. Asai, S. Itoh, and T. Masuda, Chiral split Magnon in altermagnetic MnTe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 156702 (2024)

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    Q. Sun, J. Guo, D. Wang, D. L. Abernathy, W. Tian, and C. Li, Observation of chiral magnon band splitting in altermagnetic hematite, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 186703 (2025)

    work page 2025

  19. [19]

    R. D. Gonzalez Betancourt, J. Zubáč, R. Gonzalez- Hernandez, K. Geishendorf, Z. Šobáň, G. Springholz, K. Olejník, L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, S. T. B. Goennenwein, A. Thomas, H. Reichlová, J. Železný, and D. Kriegner, Spontaneous anomalous Hall effect arising from an unconventional compensated magnetic phase in 7 a semiconductor, Phys. Rev. Lett. ...

    work page 2023

  20. [20]

    K. P. Kluczyk, K. Gas, M. J. Grzybowski, P. Skupiński, M. A. Borysiewicz, T. Fąs, J. Suffczyński, J. Z. Do- magala, K. Grasza, A. Mycielski, M. Baj, K. H. Ahn, K. Výborný, M. Sawicki, and M. Gryglas-Borysiewicz, Coexistence of anomalous Hall effect and weak magne- tization in a nominally collinear antiferromagnet MnTe, Phys. Rev. B 110, 155201 (2024)

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    Reichlova, R

    H. Reichlova, R. Lopes Seeger, R. González-Hernández, I. Kounta, R. Schlitz, D. Kriegner, P. Ritzinger, M. Lammel, M. Leiviskä, A. Birk Hellenes, K. Olejník, V. Petřiček, P. Doležal, L. Horak, E. Schmoranzerova, A. Badura, S. Bertaina, A. Thomas, V. Baltz, L. Michez, J. Sinova, S. T. B. Goennenwein, T. Jungwirth, and L. Šmejkal, Observation of a spontaneo...

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    Z. Zhou, X. Cheng, M. Hu, R. Chu, H. Bai, L. Han, J. Liu, F. Pan, and C. Song, Manipulation of the al- termagnetic order in CrSb via crystal symmetry, Nature 638, 645 (2025)

    work page 2025

  23. [23]

    Takagi, R

    R. Takagi, R. Hirakida, Y. Settai, R. Oiwa, H. Tak- agi, A. Kitaori, K. Yamauchi, H. Inoue, J.-i. Yamaura, D. Nishio-Hamane, S. Itoh, S. Aji, H. Saito, T. Nakajima, T. Nomoto, R. Arita, and S. Seki, Spontaneous Hall ef- fect induced by collinear antiferromagnetic order at room temperature, Nat. Mater. 24, 63 (2025)

    work page 2025

  24. [24]

    Hariki, A

    A. Hariki, A. Dal Din, O. J. Amin, T. Yamaguchi, A. Badura, D. Kriegner, K. W. Edmonds, R. P. Cam- pion, P. Wadley, D. Backes, L. S. I. Veiga, S. S. Dhesi, G. Springholz, L. Šmejkal, K. Výborný, T. Jungwirth, and J. Kuneš, X-Ray magnetic circular dichroism in alter- magnetic α -MnTe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 176701 (2024)

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    Aoyama and K

    T. Aoyama and K. Ohgushi, Piezomagnetic properties in altermagnetic MnTe, Phys. Rev. Mater. 8, L041402 (2024)

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    M. Roig, A. Kreisel, Y. Yu, B. M. Andersen, and D. F. Agterberg, Minimal models for altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. B 110, 144412 (2024)

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    V. Leeb, A. Mook, L. Šmejkal, and J. Knolle, Sponta- neous formation of altermagnetism from orbital ordering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 236701 (2024)

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    P. A. McClarty and J. G. Rau, Landau theory of alter- magnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 176702 (2024)

    work page 2024

  29. [29]

    I. I. Mazin and K. D. Belashchenko, Origin of the gos- samer ferromagnetism in MnTe, Phys. Rev. B 110, 214436 (2024)

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    Autieri, R

    C. Autieri, R. M. Sattigeri, G. Cuono, and A. Fakhre- dine, Staggered Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction induc - ing weak ferromagnetism in centrosymmetric altermag- nets and weak ferrimagnetism in noncentrosymmetric al- termagnets, Phys. Rev. B 111, 054442 (2025)

    work page 2025

  31. [31]

    M. Roig, Y. Yu, R. C. Ekman, A. Kreisel, B. M. Ander- sen, and D. F. Agterberg, Quasisymmetry-constrained spin ferromagnetism in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 016703 (2025)

    work page 2025

  32. [32]

    D. Jo, D. Go, Y. Mokrousov, P. M. Oppeneer, S.-W. Cheong, and H.-W. Lee, Weak ferromagnetism in alter- magnets from alternating g-tensor anisotropy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 196703 (2025)

    work page 2025

  33. [33]

    H. A. Alperin, P. J. Brown, R. Nathans, and S. J. Pickart, Polarized neutron Study of antiferromagnetic domains in MnF2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 8, 237 (1962)

    work page 1962

  34. [34]

    G. P. Felcher and R. Kleb, Antiferromagnetic domains and the spin-flop transition of MnF 2, Europhys. Lett. 36, 455 (1996)

    work page 1996

  35. [35]

    Fries, Y

    T. Fries, Y. Shapira, A. Paduan-Filho, C. C. Becerra, and F. Palacio, Remanent magnetization of the dilute antifer- romagnets Mn 1− xZnxF2 at very low magnetic fields, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 5, 8083 (1993)

    work page 1993

  36. [36]

    A. S. Disa, M. Fechner, T. F. Nova, B. Liu, M. Först, D. Prabhakaran, P. G. Radaelli, and A. Cavalleri, Po- larizing an antiferromagnet by optical engineering of the crystal field, Nat. Phys. 16, 937 (2020)

    work page 2020

  37. [37]

    H.-Y. Ma, M. Hu, N. Li, J. Liu, W. Yao, J.-F. Jia, and J. Liu, Multifunctional antiferromagnetic materials with giant piezomagnetism and noncollinear spin current, Nat. Commun. 12, 2846 (2021)

    work page 2021

  38. [38]

    Komuro, T

    M. Komuro, T. Aoyama, and K. Ohgushi, Revisiting the piezomagnetic effect in the rutile fluorides MnF 2 and CoF2, Phys. Rev. B 111, 214445 (2025)

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    Moriya, Anisotropic superexchange interaction and weak ferromagnetism, Phys

    T. Moriya, Anisotropic superexchange interaction and weak ferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. 120, 91 (1960)

    work page 1960

  40. [40]

    L. M. Sandratskii and J. Kübler, Role of orbital polariza- tion in weak ferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4963 (1996)

    work page 1996

  41. [41]

    Šmejkal, R

    L. Šmejkal, R. González-Hernández, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, Crystal time-reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneous Hall effect in collinear antiferromagnets, Sci . Adv. 6, eaaz8809 (2020)

    work page 2020

  42. [42]

    P. A. McClarty, A. Gukasov, and J. G. Rau, Observing altermagnetism using polarized neutrons, Phys. Rev. B 111, L060405 (2025)

    work page 2025

  43. [43]

    Nathans, S

    R. Nathans, S. J. Pickart, H. A. Alperin, and P. J. Brown, Polarized-neutron study of hematite, Phys. Rev. 136, A1641 (1964)

    work page 1964

  44. [44]

    M. J. M. de Almeida, Magnetisation density and cova- lency in ferrous fluoride, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 21, 1111 (1988)

    work page 1988

  45. [45]

    M. G. Kim, H. Miao, B. Gao, S.-W. Cheong, C. Maz- zoli, A. Barbour, W. Hu, S. B. Wilkins, I. K. Robinson, M. P. M. Dean, and V. Kiryukhin, Imaging antiferromag- netic antiphase domain boundaries using magnetic Bragg diffraction phase contrast, Nat. Commun. 9, 5013 (2018)

    work page 2018

  46. [46]

    H. A. Mook, Magnetic moment distribution of nickel metal, Phys. Rev. 148, 495 (1966)

    work page 1966

  47. [47]

    Prokeš, F

    K. Prokeš, F. Mezei, and A. Gukasov, Polarized neutron diffraction on a diamagnetic bismuth single crystal, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 485, 286 (2019)

    work page 2019

  48. [48]

    J. B. C. Efrem D’Sa, P. A. Bhobe, K. R. Priolkar, A. Das, S. K. Paranjpe, R. B. Prabhu, and P. R. Sarode, Low- temperature neutron diffraction study of MnTe, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 285, 267 (2005)

    work page 2005

  49. [49]

    Z. Liu, S. Xu, J. M. DeStefano, E. Rosenberg, T. Zhang, J. Li, M. B. Stone, F. Ye, R. Cong, S. Pan, C.-W. Chu, L. Deng, E. Morosan, R. M. Fernandes, J.-H. Chu, and P. Dai, Strain-tunable anomalous Hall effect in hexagonal MnTe (2025), arXiv:2509.19582

    work page arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    Brinker, M

    S. Brinker, M. d. S. Dias, and S. Lounis, The chiral biquadratic pair interaction, New J. Phys. 21, 083015 (2019)

    work page 2019

  51. [51]

    Lászlóffy, L

    A. Lászlóffy, L. Rózsa, K. Palotás, L. Udvardi, and L. Szunyogh, Magnetic structure of monatomic Fe chains on Re(0001): Emergence of chiral multispin interactions, Phys. Rev. B 99, 184430 (2019)

    work page 2019

  52. [52]

    See Supplemental Material at URL for additional infor- mation about sample preparation, experimental details, and formulations, which includes Refs. [53–57]. 8

    work page

  53. [53]

    Nakajima, H

    T. Nakajima, H. Saito, N. Kobayashi, T. Kawasaki, T. Nakamura, H. Kawano-Furukawa, S. Asai, and T. Masuda, Polarized and unpolarized neutron scatter- ing for magnetic materials at the triple-axis spectrometer PONTA in JRR-3, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 93, 091002 (2024)

    work page 2024

  54. [54]

    Szuszkiewicz, E

    W. Szuszkiewicz, E. Dynowska, B. Witkowska, and B. Hennion, Spin-wave measurements on hexagonal MnTe of NiAs-type structure by inelastic neutron scat- tering, Phys. Rev. B 73, 104403 (2006)

    work page 2006

  55. [55]

    Kriegner, H

    D. Kriegner, H. Reichlova, J. Grenzer, W. Schmidt, E. Ressouche, J. Godinho, T. Wagner, S. Y. Martin, A. B. Shick, V. V. Volobuev, G. Springholz, V. Holý, J. Wunderlich, T. Jungwirth, and K. Výborný, Magnetic anisotropy in antiferromagnetic hexagonal MnTe, Phys. Rev. B 96, 214418 (2017)

    work page 2017

  56. [56]

    Y. Yu, M. B. Lyngby, T. Shishidou, M. Roig, A. Kreisel, M. Weinert, B. M. Andersen, and D. F. Agterberg, Odd- parity magnetism driven by antiferromagnetic exchange, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 046701 (2025)

    work page 2025

  57. [57]

    Brekke, P

    B. Brekke, P. Sukhachov, H. G. Giil, A. Brataas, and J. Linder, Minimal models and transport properties of unconventional p-wave magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 236703 (2024)

    work page 2024

  58. [58]

    Kriegner, K

    D. Kriegner, K. Výborný, K. Olejník, H. Reichlová, V. Novák, X. Marti, J. Gazquez, V. Saidl, P. Němec, V. V. Volobuev, G. Springholz, V. Holý, and T. Jung- wirth, Multiple-stable anisotropic magnetoresistance memory in antiferromagnetic MnTe, Nat. Commun. 7, 11623 (2016)

    work page 2016

  59. [59]

    O. J. Amin, A. Dal Din, E. Golias, Y. Niu, A. Za- kharov, S. C. Fromage, C. J. B. Fields, S. L. Heywood, R. B. Cousins, F. Maccherozzi, J. Krempaský, J. H. Dil, D. Kriegner, B. Kiraly, R. P. Campion, A. W. Rushforth, K. W. Edmonds, S. S. Dhesi, L. Šmejkal, T. Jungwirth, and P. Wadley, Nanoscale imaging and control of alter- magnetism in MnTe, Nature 636, ...

    work page 2024

  60. [60]

    Kaiser, A

    U. Kaiser, A. Schwarz, and R. Wiesendanger, Magnetic exchange force microscopy with atomic resolution, Na- ture 446, 522 (2007)

    work page 2007

  61. [61]

    Scholl, J

    A. Scholl, J. Stöhr, J. Lüning, J. W. Seo, J. Fompeyrine, H. Siegwart, J.-P. Locquet, F. Nolting, S. Anders, E. E. Fullerton, M. R. Scheinfein, and H. A. Padmore, Ob- servation of antiferromagnetic domains in epitaxial thin films, Science 287, 1014 (2000)

    work page 2000

  62. [62]

    Fiebig, D

    M. Fiebig, D. Fröhlich, B. B. Krichevtsov, and R. V. Pis- arev, Second harmonic generation and magnetic-dipole- electric-dipole interference in antiferromagnetic Cr 2O3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 2127 (1994)

    work page 1994

  63. [63]

    L.-D. Yuan, A. B. Georgescu, and J. M. Rondinelli, Non- relativistic spin splitting at the Brillouin zone center in compensated magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 216701 (2024)

    work page 2024

  64. [64]

    X. Chen, Y. Liu, P. Liu, Y. Yu, J. Ren, J. Li, A. Zhang, and Q. Liu, Unconventional magnons in collinear mag- nets dictated by spin space groups, Nature 640, 349 (2025)

    work page 2025

  65. [65]

    M. Bode, E. Y. Vedmedenko, K. von Bergmann, A. Ku- betzka, P. Ferriani, S. Heinze, and R. Wiesendanger, Atomic spin structure of antiferromagnetic domain walls, Nature Mater 5, 477 (2006)

    work page 2006

  66. [66]

    Badura, W

    A. Badura, W. H. Campos, V. K. Bharadwaj, I. Kounta, L. Michez, M. Petit, J. Rial, M. Leiviskä, V. Baltz, F. Krizek, D. Kriegner, J. Železný, J. Zemen, S. Telkamp, S. Sailler, M. Lammel, R. Jaeschke-Ubiergo, A. B. Hel- lenes, R. González-Hernández, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, S. T. B. Goennenwein, L. Šmejkal, and H. Reichlova, Ob- servation of the anomalous ...

    work page 2025

  67. [67]

    Takagi, R

    H. Takagi, R. Takagi, S. Minami, T. Nomoto, K. Ohishi, M.-T. Suzuki, Y. Yanagi, M. Hirayama, N. D. Khanh, K. Karube, H. Saito, D. Hashizume, R. Kiyanagi, Y. Tokura, R. Arita, T. Nakajima, and S. Seki, Sponta- neous topological Hall effect induced by non-coplanar an- tiferromagnetic order in intercalated van der Waals ma- terials, Nat. Phys. 19, 961 (2023)

    work page 2023

  68. [68]

    Šmejkal, A

    L. Šmejkal, A. B. Hellenes, R. González-Hernández, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Giant and tunneling mag- netoresistance in unconventional collinear antiferromag - nets with nonrelativistic spin-momentum coupling, Phys. Rev. X 12, 011028 (2022)

    work page 2022

  69. [69]

    Noh, G.-H

    S. Noh, G.-H. Kim, J. Lee, H. Jung, U. Seo, G. So, J. Lee, S. Lee, M. Park, S. Yang, Y. S. Oh, H. Jin, C. Sohn, and J.-W. Yoo, Tunneling magnetoresistance in alter- magnetic RuO 2-Based magnetic tunnel junctions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 246703 (2025)

    work page 2025

  70. [70]

    Z. Liu, S. Asai, S. Takahashi, H. Saito, T. Nakajima, and T. Masuda, Observation of Altermagnetic Order Switch- ing in Bulk MnTe by Polarized Neutron Diffraction, Zen- odo (2026), 10.5281/zenodo.20305737

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.20305737 2026