Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

On the Nonlinear Impulsive $\Psi$--Hilfer Fractional Differential Equations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1901.01814 v2 pith:VJ7VFICP submitted 2019-01-07 math.DS math.AP

classification math.DSmath.AP
keywords differentialfractionalhilferimpulsiveresultsequationnonlinearacquired
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

In this paper, we consider the nonlinear $\Psi$-Hilfer impulsive fractional differential equation. Our main objective is to derive the formula for the solution and examine the existence and uniqueness of results. The acquired results are extended to the nonlocal $\Psi$-Hilfer impulsive fractional differential equation. We gave an applications to the outcomes we procured. Further, examples are provided in support of the results we got.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. On the Impulsive Implicit $\Psi$--Hilfer Fractional Differential Equations with Delay

    math.DS 2019-08 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper claims unique solutions and Ulam-Hyers-Mittag-Leffler stability for implicit impulsive Psi-Hilfer fractional differential equations with delay, but the stability proof relies on a false monotonicity assertion.

  2. Analysis of Impulsive $\varphi$--Hilfer Fractional Differential Equations

    math.DS 2019-08 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    Extends standard existence, stability, and dependence theorems to impulsive phi-Hilfer fractional differential equations, but the claimed result on dependence on the derivative order is not correctly proved.

Pith tools