REVIEW 2 cited by
Exact and Efficient Unlearning for Large Language Model-based Recommendation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The evolving paradigm of Large Language Model-based Recommendation (LLMRec) customizes Large Language Models (LLMs) through parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) using recommendation data. The inclusion of user data in LLMs raises privacy concerns. To protect users, the unlearning process in LLMRec, specifically removing unusable data (e.g., historical behaviors) from established LLMRec models, becomes crucial. However, existing unlearning methods are insufficient for the unique characteristics of LLM-Rec, mainly due to high computational costs or incomplete data erasure. In this study, we introduce the Adapter Partition and Aggregation (APA) framework for exact and efficient unlearning while maintaining recommendation performance. APA achieves this by establishing distinct adapters for partitioned training data shards and retraining only the adapters impacted by unusable data for unlearning. To preserve recommendation performance and mitigate considerable inference costs, APA employs parameter-level adapter aggregation with sample-adaptive attention for individual testing samples. Extensive experiments substantiate the effectiveness and efficiency of our proposed framework
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Unified Parameter-Efficient Unlearning for LLMs
An influence-function-based parameter editing framework performs instance removal, query modification, and response correction on PEFT adapters without retraining.
-
Methods to Assess the UK Government's Current Role as a Data Provider for AI
Using unlearning-based ablation and information-leakage tests, the paper finds UK government websites matter for LLM performance on welfare queries while data.gov.uk datasets are not recalled.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.