Pith. sign in

REVIEW 39 references

Naturalness-Aware Curriculum Learning with Dynamic Temperature for Speech Deepfake Detection

T0 review · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A naturalness-based curriculum and per-sample dynamic temperature reduce speech deepfake detection EER on ASVspoof 2021 DF from 2.45% to 1.88%.

arxiv 2505.13976 v1 pith:VJG2Y6EM submitted 2025-05-20 eess.AS cs.SD

Taewoo Kim , Guisik Kim , Choongsang Cho , Young Han Lee This is my paper · ORCID
classification eess.AScs.SD
keywords speechtrainingdetectionnaturalnessnaturalness-awarecurriculumdeepfakedynamic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The goal is spotting fake speech. Most detectors look for small artifacts left by synthesizers. This paper adds a training-time signal: how natural the audio sounds, measured by a mean opinion score (MOS) predictor called UTMOS. The authors split samples into easy and hard categories. Unnatural spoofs are easy, while natural-sounding spoofs or unclear real speech are hard. Training starts on easy samples and gradually adds harder ones. That is curriculum learning.

The second ingredient changes the model's confidence during training. Samples the model should be unsure about get a higher softmax temperature, which flattens the output probabilities. Easy samples get a lower temperature, sharpening them. The temperature is set per sample from its MOS.

On the ASVspoof 2021 DeepFake evaluation, the XLS-R Conformer baseline drops from 2.45% to 1.88% EER with both ingredients, a 23% relative improvement. On in-the-wild fake audio the EER drops from 7.29% to 6.60%. The gains come without changing the network. However, no error bars are reported, baseline numbers differ between tables, and several hyperparameters are chosen on the same training data, so the exact gain should be treated as preliminary.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Integrating naturalness-aware curriculum learning and dynamic temperature scaling into XLS-R Conformer achieves the lowest EER on both ASVspoof 2021 LA and DF: 0.89% and 1.88%, respectively, representing 18% and 23% relative improvements over the baseline without modifying the model architecture (Section 4.3.1, Tables 1 and 3).

Load-bearing premise

UTMOS-predicted naturalness scores on the ASVspoof 2019 training set provide a valid, stable ordering of sample difficulty, and the single grid-searched MOS threshold plus the hand-set curriculum schedules (H and T) generalize to ASVspoof 2021 and In-The-Wild test distributions without per-dataset retuning.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The method introduces no new physical or architectural entities. It relies on fitted curriculum hyperparameters, a grid-searched MOS threshold, and the behavioral assumption that UTMOS naturalness is a valid difficulty signal. These are the load-bearing pieces that a reimplementation must fix or test to trust the reported gains.

free parameters (5)
  • difficulty_levels_H = [0.35, 0.5, 0.65, 0.8, 1.0]
    Hand-selected subset difficulty thresholds that define the curriculum stages; no sensitivity analysis is provided.
  • pacing_sequence_T = [1, 9, 17, 21, 23]
    Hand-selected epochs at which harder samples enter training; not derived from theory or tuned on validation.
  • normalized_MOS_threshold_mth = 3.584 (raw MOS)
    Obtained by grid search on the training set to best separate spoof and bona fide speech; used in the temperature formula and lambda.
  • DT_activation_difficulty_level = 0.8
    Dynamic temperature is enabled only after curriculum difficulty reaches 0.8; this activation point is chosen by hand.
  • early_stopping_patience = 7
    Hand-selected patience for early stopping once all curriculum levels are active.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption UTMOS naturalness predictions on the ASVspoof 2019 training set are accurate enough to order samples by perceptual naturalness.
    The difficulty score uses normalized UTMOS as a proxy for naturalness; Section 4.1 and Equation 1.
  • domain assumption A curriculum that starts with easy samples and adds hard samples improves final generalization in speech deepfake detection.
    Adopted from Bengio et al. [18] and Song et al. [19]; Section 3.2.
  • domain assumption Samples with higher predicted MOS (more natural) are harder for a spoof detector to classify, conditional on label.
    Equation 1 defines difficulty this way; if naturalness does not track classifier difficulty, the curriculum ordering is unjustified.
  • ad hoc to paper Dynamic softmax temperature based on per-sample MOS improves generalization without distorting the decision boundary.
    Equations 3 and 4 introduce sample-dependent temperature; the only evidence is the ablation in Table 5, which shows fixed temperatures trade off LA vs DF performance.
  • domain assumption The validation set can be used to select the five best models without making test-set results overoptimistic.
    Section 4.2 reports final results as a weighted average of the five best-performing models on the validation set.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Naturalness-Aware Curriculum Learning with Dynamic Temperature for Speech Deepfake Detection." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VJG2Y6EM

@misc{pith2026250513976,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Naturalness-Aware Curriculum Learning with Dynamic Temperature for Speech Deepfake Detection},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VJG2Y6EM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.13976}
}
read the original abstract

Recent advances in speech deepfake detection (SDD) have significantly improved artifacts-based detection in spoofed speech. However, most models overlook speech naturalness, a crucial cue for distinguishing bona fide speech from spoofed speech. This study proposes naturalness-aware curriculum learning, a novel training framework that leverages speech naturalness to enhance the robustness and generalization of SDD. This approach measures sample difficulty using both ground-truth labels and mean opinion scores, and adjusts the training schedule to progressively introduce more challenging samples. To further improve generalization, a dynamic temperature scaling method based on speech naturalness is incorporated into the training process. A 23% relative reduction in the EER was achieved in the experiments on the ASVspoof 2021 DF dataset, without modifying the model architecture. Ablation studies confirmed the effectiveness of naturalness-aware training strategies for SDD tasks.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.13976 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Overview of the proposed training framework. 2.2. Temperature scaling Temperature scaling was initially introduced for knowledge dis￾tillation [20] and has also been applied to confidence calibra￾tion [21] in classification models. Recently, Dabre et al. [22] demonstrated that applying temperature scaling during training can reduce overfitting and improve generalization in neural ma￾chine translation. Similarly, Kha… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    However, the increasing realism of synthetic speech has raised significant societal concerns, such as financial fraud, impersonation attacks, and misinformation dissemination

    Introduction Advancements in speech synthesis technologies, such as text- to-speech (TTS) and voice conversion (VC), have enabled var- ious applications in virtual assistants, entertainment, and ac- cessibility. However, the increasing realism of synthetic speech has raised significant societal concerns, such as financial fraud, impersonation attacks, and...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Naturalness-Aware Curriculum Learning with Dynamic Temperature for Speech Deepfake Detection

    Related work 2.1. Curriculum learning for neural networks Curriculum learning (CL), first introduced by Bengio et al. [18], improves model performance by gradually increasing the diffi- culty of the training samples. Inspired by the way humans learn by beginning with easy concepts and gradually moving to more challenging ones, CL improves the generalizabi...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  3. [3]

    Method 3.1. Overview Figure 1 presents an overview of the proposed training frame- work, which integrates curriculum learning and dynamic tem- perature scaling to enhance the speech deepfake detection (SDD) model. In Figure 1(a), the curriculum learning compo- nent organizes training by measuring sample difficulty and ad- justing the training schedule acc...

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    Datasets and metrics In the experiments, all models were trained on the ASVspoof 2019 logical access (LA) dataset [1]

    Experiments 4.1. Datasets and metrics In the experiments, all models were trained on the ASVspoof 2019 logical access (LA) dataset [1]. The training set included 2,580 bona fide and 22,800 spoofed utterances, while the valida- tion set included 1,064 bona fide and 22,296 spoofed utterances, which were generated using four TTS and two VC algorithms. We com...

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    Conclusion In this study, we introduce a naturalness-aware training strat- egy that combines curriculum learning and dynamic tempera- ture scaling to enhance speech deepfake detection performance. We present an efficient learning method that leverages percep- tual quality, particularly naturalness, to measure sample dif- ficulty and progressively introduc...

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    Acknowledgements This work was partly supported by Institute of Information & communications Technology Planning & Evaluation (IITP) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No.2022-0- 00963 and No.RS-2024-00456709)

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Modified magnitude- phase spectrum information for spoofing detection,

    J. Yang, H. Wang, R. K. Das, and Y . Qian, “Modified magnitude- phase spectrum information for spoofing detection,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing , vol. 29, pp. 1065–1078, 2021

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Asvspoof 2019: Future horizons in spoofed and fake audio detection,

    M. Todisco, X. Wang, V . Vestman, M. Sahidullah, H. Delgado, A. Nautsch, J. Yamagishi, N. Evans, T. H. Kinnunen, and K. A. Lee, “Asvspoof 2019: Future horizons in spoofed and fake audio detection,” in Interspeech 2019, 2019, pp. 1008–1012

    2019

Show all 39 references
  1. [9]

    Asvspoof 2021: accelerating progress in spoofed and deep- fake speech detection,

    J. Yamagishi, X. Wang, M. Todisco, M. Sahidullah, J. Patino, A. Nautsch, X. Liu, K. A. Lee, T. Kinnunen, N. Evans, and H. Del- gado, “Asvspoof 2021: accelerating progress in spoofed and deep- fake speech detection,” in 2021 Edition of the Automatic Speaker Verification and Spo...

    2021

  2. [10]

    Raw differentiable architecture search for speech deepfake and spoofing detection,

    W. Ge, J. Patino, M. Todisco, and N. Evans, “Raw differentiable architecture search for speech deepfake and spoofing detection,” in 2021 Edition of the Automatic Speaker Verification and Spoof- ing Countermeasures Challenge, 2021, pp. 22–28

    2021

  3. [11]

    Re- play and synthetic speech detection with res2net architecture,

    X. Li, N. Li, C. Weng, X. Liu, D. Su, D. Yu, and H. Meng, “Re- play and synthetic speech detection with res2net architecture,” in ICASSP 2021-2021 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2021, pp. 6354– 6358

    2021

  4. [12]

    Aasist: Audio anti-spoofing using in- tegrated spectro-temporal graph attention networks,

    J.-w. Jung, H.-S. Heo, H. Tak, H.-j. Shim, J. S. Chung, B.-J. Lee, H.-J. Yu, and N. Evans, “Aasist: Audio anti-spoofing using in- tegrated spectro-temporal graph attention networks,” in ICASSP 2022-2022 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing (...

    2022

  5. [13]

    Phase-aware spoof speech detection based on res2net with phase network,

    J. Kim and S. M. Ban, “Phase-aware spoof speech detection based on res2net with phase network,” in ICASSP 2023-2023 IEEE In- ternational Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Process- ing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–5

    2023

  6. [14]

    Av- ocodo: Generative adversarial network for artifact-free vocoder,

    T. Bak, J. Lee, H. Bae, J. Yang, J.-S. Bae, and Y .-S. Joo, “Av- ocodo: Generative adversarial network for artifact-free vocoder,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 37, no. 11, 2023, pp. 12 562–12 570

    2023

  7. [15]

    Automatic speaker verification spoofing and deep- fake detection using wav2vec 2.0 and data augmentation,

    H. Tak, M. Todisco, X. Wang, J. weon Jung, J. Yamagishi, and N. Evans, “Automatic speaker verification spoofing and deep- fake detection using wav2vec 2.0 and data augmentation,” in The Speaker and Language Recognition Workshop (Odyssey 2022) , 2022, pp. 112–119

    2022

  8. [16]

    Audio deep- fake detection with self-supervised wavlm and multi-fusion atten- tive classifier,

    Y . Guo, H. Huang, X. Chen, H. Zhao, and Y . Wang, “Audio deep- fake detection with self-supervised wavlm and multi-fusion atten- tive classifier,” in ICASSP 2024-2024 IEEE International Con- ference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) . IEEE, 2024, pp. 12 702–12 706

    2024

  9. [17]

    A conformer-based classifier for variable-length utterance process- ing in anti-spoofing,

    E. Rosello, A. Gomez-Alanis, A. M. Gomez, and A. Peinado, “A conformer-based classifier for variable-length utterance process- ing in anti-spoofing,” in Interspeech 2023, 2023, pp. 5281–5285

    2023

  10. [18]

    Temporal-channel modeling in multi-head self- attention for synthetic speech detection,

    D.-T. Truong, R. Tao, T. Nguyen, H.-T. Luong, K. A. Lee, and E. S. Chng, “Temporal-channel modeling in multi-head self- attention for synthetic speech detection,” in Interspeech 2024 , 2024, pp. 537–541

    2024

  11. [19]

    Xls-r: Self-supervised cross-lingual speech representation learning at scale,

    A. Babu, C. Wang, A. Tjandra, K. Lakhotia, Q. Xu, N. Goyal, K. Singh, P. von Platen, Y . Saraf, J. Pino, A. Baevski, A. Con- neau, and M. Auli, “Xls-r: Self-supervised cross-lingual speech representation learning at scale,” in Interspeech 2022, 2022, pp. 2278–2282

    2022

  12. [20]

    Wavlm: Large-scale self- supervised pre-training for full stack speech processing,

    S. Chen, C. Wang, Z. Chen, Y . Wu, S. Liu, Z. Chen, J. Li, N. Kanda, T. Yoshioka, X. Xiao et al., “Wavlm: Large-scale self- supervised pre-training for full stack speech processing,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing , vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 1505–1518, 2022

    2022

  13. [21]

    On calibra- tion of modern neural networks,

    C. Guo, G. Pleiss, Y . Sun, and K. Q. Weinberger, “On calibra- tion of modern neural networks,” in International conference on machine learning. PMLR, 2017, pp. 1321–1330

    2017

  14. [22]

    Grad-tts: A diffusion probabilistic model for text-to-speech,

    V . Popov, I. V ovk, V . Gogoryan, T. Sadekova, and M. Kudinov, “Grad-tts: A diffusion probabilistic model for text-to-speech,” in International Conference on Machine Learning . PMLR, 2021, pp. 8599–8608

    2021

  15. [23]

    Matcha-tts: A fast tts architecture with conditional flow match- ing,

    S. Mehta, R. Tu, J. Beskow, ´E. Sz ´ekely, and G. E. Henter, “Matcha-tts: A fast tts architecture with conditional flow match- ing,” in ICASSP 2024-2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2024, pp. 11 341–11 345

    2024

  16. [24]

    Evaluating and reducing the distance between synthetic and real speech distributions,

    C. Minixhofer, O. Klejch, and P. Bell, “Evaluating and reducing the distance between synthetic and real speech distributions,” in Interspeech 2023, 2023, pp. 2078–2082

    2023

  17. [25]

    Curriculum learning,

    Y . Bengio, J. Louradour, R. Collobert, and J. Weston, “Curriculum learning,” in Proceedings of the 26th annual international confer- ence on machine learning, 2009, pp. 41–48

    2009

  18. [26]

    Two different Raw- Boost algorithms were applied depending on the dataset

    data augmentation to all the models. Two different Raw- Boost algorithms were applied depending on the dataset. For the LA evaluation, we applied data augmentation with a com- bination of linear and non-linear convolutive noise and impul- sive signal-dependent additive noise. ...

    2021

  19. [27]

    Towards generic deepfake detec- tion with dynamic curriculum,

    W. Song, Y . Lin, and B. Li, “Towards generic deepfake detec- tion with dynamic curriculum,” inICASSP 2024-2024 IEEE Inter- national Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2024, pp. 4500–4504

    2024

  20. [28]

    Distilling the knowledge in a neural network,

    G. Hinton, “Distilling the knowledge in a neural network,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.02531, 2015

    2015 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Investigating softmax tempering for training neural machine translation models,

    R. Dabre and A. Fujita, “Investigating softmax tempering for training neural machine translation models,” in Proceedings of Machine Translation Summit XVIII: Research Track , 2021, pp. 114–126

    2021

  22. [30]

    Dynamic temper- ature scaling in contrastive self-supervised learning for sensor- based human activity recognition,

    B. Khaertdinov, S. Asteriadis, and E. Ghaleb, “Dynamic temper- ature scaling in contrastive self-supervised learning for sensor- based human activity recognition,”IEEE Transactions on Biomet- rics, Behavior, and Identity Science , vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 498–507, 2022

    2022

  23. [31]

    Utmos: Utokyo-sarulab system for voicemos challenge 2022,

    T. Saeki, D. Xin, W. Nakata, T. Koriyama, S. Takamichi, and H. Saruwatari, “Utmos: Utokyo-sarulab system for voicemos challenge 2022,” in Interspeech 2022, 2022, pp. 4521–4525

    2022

  24. [32]

    Does audio deepfake detection generalize?

    N. M ¨uller, P. Czempin, F. Diekmann, A. Froghyar, and K. B¨ottinger, “Does audio deepfake detection generalize?” in In- terspeech 2022, 2022, pp. 2783–2787

    2022

  25. [33]

    Raw- boost: A raw data boosting and augmentation method applied to automatic speaker verification anti-spoofing,

    H. Tak, M. Kamble, J. Patino, M. Todisco, and N. Evans, “Raw- boost: A raw data boosting and augmentation method applied to automatic speaker verification anti-spoofing,” in ICASSP 2022- 2022 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IE...

    2022

  26. [34]

    Improving short utterance anti-spoofing with aasist2,

    Y . Zhang, J. Lu, Z. Shang, W. Wang, and P. Zhang, “Improving short utterance anti-spoofing with aasist2,” in ICASSP 2024-2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2024, pp. 11 636–11 640

    2024

  27. [35]

    Mixture of experts fusion for fake audio detection using frozen wav2vec 2.0,

    Z. Wang, R. Fu, Z. Wen, J. Tao, X. Wang, Y . Xie, X. Qi, S. Shi, Y . Lu, Y . Liu et al. , “Mixture of experts fusion for fake audio detection using frozen wav2vec 2.0,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.11909, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  28. [36]

    One-class learning with adap- tive centroid shift for audio deepfake detection,

    H. M. Kim, K. Jang, and H. Kim, “One-class learning with adap- tive centroid shift for audio deepfake detection,” in Interspeech 2024, 2024, pp. 4853–4857

    2024

  29. [37]

    Audio deepfake detection with self-supervised xls-r and sls classifier,

    Q. Zhang, S. Wen, and T. Hu, “Audio deepfake detection with self-supervised xls-r and sls classifier,” inProceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia , 2024, pp. 6765– 6773

    2024

  30. [38]

    Deep learning based assessment of syn- thetic speech naturalness,

    G. Mittag and S. M ¨oller, “Deep learning based assessment of syn- thetic speech naturalness,” in Interspeech 2020, 2020, pp. 1748– 1752

    2020

  31. [39]

    Dnsmos: A non-intrusive perceptual objective speech quality metric to evaluate noise sup- pressors,

    C. K. Reddy, V . Gopal, and R. Cutler, “Dnsmos: A non-intrusive perceptual objective speech quality metric to evaluate noise sup- pressors,” in ICASSP 2021-2021 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) . IEEE, 2021, pp. 6493–6497

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.